LSAT | Test 87, Logic Game 4 - Charity

[@SGMukherji]

Took me 10 minutes. This is one of the most brain tickling question i've ever seen on LSAT

[@originalsweetz]

I really like the way that you approach the problems and explain them!

[@peter2012rezk]

This problem stumped me so hard and you explained it so well. Thank you so much!

[@r.p.8906]

The first deduction that L has to go Saturday was the key inference to solving the entire game. So, we need to make inferences before even starting the questions. Thanks!

[@BryannaBlue]

So many skills were taught in this one video

[@Himself42]

Lsat god is an important lesson. I’ve spent too much time on questions trying to figure stuff out when the answer had something in it I figured out 45 seconds ago

[@kadeemharper1]

This was extremely helpful, THANK YOU!

[@oliviacassandro7715]

This is so wonderful!

[@Estelle5592]

Thank you!

[@kevinpearson569]

Why can’t N go twice on Friday. eg Thrus: MLP Fri: NNP Sat: LMQ?

[@kevinpearson569]

Can’t work twice in 1 day

[@zachfinemusic]

This is a poor setup. We know the contra positive is -L->-M and that for sure will happen in 1 one the groups because of the max going 2x rule (L can’t go 3x). This means that there will for sure be a group of NPQ. so the question is where can that group go? Well we know P can’t go in group 3. So make 2 options. One with group 1 with NPQ and the second option with group 2 NPQ. Further, there has to be two L and that fills out one of the charts.

[@irishou3306]

I think you really should have just split the game board on Q21, based on whether M appears twice. Because the fact that P and Q have to be on Friday is just not an immediate inference. Splittin the game board is a very intuitive approach. The position of M is given so it makes sense that M should be the splitting criterion.

[@winsonly544]

I got stumped by this because I didn't recognize that the ML was an If M, then L