Strikes On Russia's Strategic Defense Objects Will Only Intensify | Military Summary For 2024.05.25

[@mickser101]

When it comes to Hypocrisy, USA are the King's, the masters, they have a PHD, a Black belt and are the Heavyweight Champions of Hypocrisy

[@julianjdogg]

Hipocrisy is normal if you are the 👑

[@jaspreetsingh-xg7if]

Hypocrisy is oxygen for america. Four directions of the World are: East, Hypocrites, North,South

[@vasilispatsalidis5683]

No way, the reigning World Champions in hypocicy are the English offcourse. They are in a class of their own.

[@leelagainpaulsingh8835]

@@vasilispatsalidis5683 same thing US is a former colony of Britain

[@2vintage68]

And nonstop LIES.

[@barrybrindle6959]

The Americans are criticizing China for being an actor in the Ukraine war! You can't make this stuff up LMAO

[@phils4634]

Along with those "sanctions" for daring to supply Russia with "possibly" dual or multiple - use goods. "We" can provide billions of $$s of weapons to our pet project, but China dare not support their next door neighbour.

[@Sanixxsx]

Well, in many cases someone acuses the other('s) for some thing they do themself. Like cheating in realtationships, and helpining in war also

[@mickvonbornemann3824]

@@Sanixxsx Classic projection, the west has been doing it since the beginning

[@derkernspalter]

This shows the pure arrogance of the Anglo Saxons.

[@chillstep4life]

U$A are so eager for WW3. They will create any excuse to start it before their economy collapse with $36 trillion debt... They have lost their mind

[@geofhughes9359]

The US and it's allies can send armaments to Ukraine but Russia's allies are not allowed to do the same for Russia? What arrogant madness is this?

[@pong9000]

The US and allies wage war without declaring war, breaking international treaties and their own constitutions I might add. There is no mandate from the citizens. Other countries have higher diplomatic standards and honour, so would need to rally support of their people, and then formally declare war.

[@Msoja8]

American hypocrisy and cynicism. Its beyond madness. And to top it all, these NATO countries call them themselves democracies yet they want to dictate to non-NATO countries. Its an absurdity.

[@Nope-w2h]

Might makes right and Russia is out numbered for now untill Europe and America become more Brown and the euro is replaced

[@Fitelikemike]

Our country is 💩

[@edthebumblingfool]

Its called respecting existing treaties.

[@stevannikolovski]

The clowns in Washington DC are astounding and their level of hypocrisy.

[@ЛЮДМИЛАЯворская-х5и]

10000000000000%%

[@yyang1902]

100%！！！

[@vasilispatsalidis5683]

You are very polite in describing this gang of goons that have grabbed power in Washington.

[@TeoBlu]

Probably most dangerous event in this war so far.

[@TheAmerican1963]

and failure ............ Is it really likely the Russians did not anticipate this ??? ......... NOT !!!!

[@GeoPoliticsCommentry]

I Knew Russia and China were the Adults in the Room all along. Now on Thursday, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa of Bahrain said that for the first time, the Arab League is united in calling for an end to the war and Gaza and that a peace conference should be held. He said that Russia was the first country he asked to support the initiative, calling Moscow “the most influential country on the international stage.”

[@schepvogelk5971]

Russia and China the adults? Are you on crack? China, a autocratic communist regime? And no, I don't see the west as superior, but calling China an adult, is lunatic.

[@niklasschmidt9552]

Russia contributes to 2% of the worlds population and it's economic significance is only slightly higher. I would call them violent and angry which makes them a trouble to deal with but if I would look for influence there's only China and the USA. All other nations are either too small or too busy with their own problems to be that influential.

[@youjustreadthis897]

​@@niklasschmidt9552You're completely missing the important factors. On matters on peace, you seek those who have a history of maintaining it and making every effort to find it Why would one turn to the US on peace matters when their foreign policy is the reason why we have 99% of these conflicts?

[@niklasschmidt9552]

@@youjustreadthis897 which factors am I missing concretely? How does Russia have a history of seeking peace? I never said the US were looking for it either, just that China and them are more influential on the global stage. I'm just trying to get your point.

[@youjustreadthis897]

@@niklasschmidt9552 They're proposing a peace conference and first country outside Arab league they asked for support is Russia, calling them the most influential country Why is their economic contribuition a factor to consider? It's a peace conference The Arab league have had enough of the so called "peace makers" who have brought anything but in the ME

[@stillcovalent]

USA to China: "Stop helping Russia" China to USA: "Stop helping Taiwan"

[@michalzajic2555]

Taiwan is preparing invade China?!

[@lepetitroquet9410]

Easy solution: Russia stops invading Ukraine and goes back home, China stops threatening to invade Taiwan and everybody can stop helping those ;p.

[@athrunzala5337]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@hansjorgkunde3772]

@@athrunzala5337 Russia to the USA and EU 'Stop helping Ukraine'

[@Arhatu]

Russia is a sovereign country, Taiwan is a Chinese island.

[@molecatcher3383]

USA to China: "Stop helping Russia" China to USA: "Try and stop me. LOL"

[@michalzajic2555]

and in few years Chinese will eat grass LOL They need USD and EUR to survive or they will go broke Big time

[@stevelamb6836]

China owns billions of American debt bonds, if they dumped them all at once…..well a collapse would be eminent

[@molecatcher3383]

@@holzy1979 China holds vast amounts of US debt that it could dump and crash the US economy.

[@oscaralison]

@@holzy1979 suuuuurrrreeee

[@ExpatZ266]

@@oscaralison Yup, it is fact. Get educated.

[@mirosali3464]

It is unbelievable that China cannot help Russia but the thing that all NATO countries are helping Ukraine both militarily and financially is OK even though Ukraine is not even a member of the EU or NATO.

[@michalzajic2555]

China can help Ukraine to defend and yes cant help to agtessor Russia. Thats writen in internation law As well inOSN agreement signed by russia LOL

[@marc-andrebrun8942]

because people who think they're above any law are involved in this war.

[@lepetitroquet9410]

Ukraine was a buffer zone between NATO and Russia, like Finland used to be. NATO members did their best to keep it a buffer zone and keep the peace (-> see France and Germany in 2008 ensuring that the idea of Ukraine entering NATO would be quickly abandoned by explaining they would veto it at every turn). Putin invaded that buffer zone, which is an attack against NATO. The rest is semantic to avoid the escalation to get out of control and this conflict Putin started to become nuclear. ps: and nobody can prevent China from doing what China wants ;p (China is really, really strong, like an order of magnitude over Russia). It's just that depending on what they do, consequences will ensue and China is looking for its own interest first and foremost.

[@MoviesvsReality]

Because Ukrainians are led by the chosen people. “Gods decision” you can’t argue against that. Same in the Middle East

[@pong9000]

China does not break international treaties, nor play "plausible deniability". So how? To enter that conflict China's diplomatic standards (and constitution) requires a declaration of war.

[@jancuk3rs]

Don't try to push the limits of a big bear's patience if they're not ready for the consequences

[@daisuke6072]

My view is they have been poking and poking but the bear is in hibernation.

[@RtFa-ol7vd]

И в глубокой. В такой глубокой что не слышит что у него в берлоге залетела что то и взорвалось

[@Turbo999be]

​@@daisuke6072 Poutine knows he has mentally unhinged red button enablers in front of him and he's trying to take maximum care for not pushing the limits too fast but at some point he will have no choice. I'm living in Brussels so I'm a bit concerned to say the least! 😮

[@marcogianese2289]

We’re ready for the consequences dw. It’s just a bear.

[@bobmarchan4487]

@@marcogianese2289 With nuclear shovels.

[@seanh4841]

Hubris and USA means the same thing

[@elleoliver6070]

United Hubris of America

[@ThomasBrowningJr]

If you live here and don't like it leave. Russia and China will take you in

[@olliefoxx7165]

Bro, America is not the same as Washington DC. Majority of Americans don't want this crap. Washington DC is controlled by globalist that have no connection to America. Same with Britain being controlled by London. Globalist are behind this madness.

[@zloymyx2486]

Есть некоторая ирония в том, что мир в принципе дозрел до стадии глобального объединения. Проблема в том, что одного только военного и экономического могущества для этого недостаточно. Культурная, социальная, и этническая деградация США идет полным ходом, и остановить ее сейчас уже практически невозможно. Я уверен, что европейские "союзники" США днем и ночью думают, над тем, как обезвредить американскую ядерную кнопку. Как они это сделали в ЮАР.

[@Bringittothetable-ns6zp]

as a Canadian iam ashamed Canada is evolved in war against Russia our ww2 ally.. who is fighting neo Nazis in Ukraine who attacked Russians first.. i pray Putin avengards trudo when he is in Kiev visiting zelinsky.. god bless and speed victory to Russia.. prayers and respect and love from Canada 🐻💙❤🤍

[@aneurindavies5943]

"Hypocrisy is the audacity to preach integrity from a Den of corruption" Wes Fesler!

[@phils4634]

Russian AND Belarus increasing the number of high-level talks, and both practicing tactical nuclear weapons drills should be sending a VERY clear message to the collective West. Nevertheless expect the hawks to continue to push for escalation, against a country that has clear, and significant, escalatory dominance. This will NOT end well.

[@Zeptus1488]

Belarus isn't a significant force and their cooperation with Russia is nothing new.

[@footlongfabo]

I don’t think Russia has escalatory dominance tbh. The only weapons they have that they haven’t used are nukes. NATO thus far hasn’t sent their best equipment yet.

[@Olegstuff21986]

Remember? "Putin's bluff", "Let's catch Putin on his bluff". These NAT- shills are leading us to nuclear annihilation.

[@Olegstuff21986]

@@Zeptus1488 Belarus is a significant force which will be able to ward off a Polish intrusion. That's their function in this conflict so far, as I understand it.

[@Olegstuff21986]

@@Zeptus1488 Also, I think it will be Belarus which will use nukes, if nukes get used by the Russian side. In principle, they will be launched from Belarus in case there's an incursion into Belarusian territory from NATO.

[@mariozadra]

Do you believe that Russia will allow its strategic infrastructure to be destroyed without reacting? I think not, for several reasons. Firstly, allowing such an event would put both the Ministry of Defense and the Security Council chaired by Putin in an illegal position. Secondly, attempting to destroy strategic infrastructure threatens the very existence of the Federation, which necessitates a response that includes the nuclear arsenal. Ты веришь, что Россия позволит разрушить свою стратегическую инфраструктуру без ответа? Я так не думаю, по нескольким причинам. Во-первых, допустить такое событие означало бы поставить Министерство обороны и Совет безопасности, возглавляемый Путиным, в незаконное положение. Во-вторых, попытка уничтожить стратегическую инфраструктуру угрожает самому существованию Федерации, что требует ответных мер, включая ядерный арсенал.

[@Direkte_Demokratie]

They send many ATACAMS to secure interruption of comunication with the satelite over south region. NATO destroy terrestrial surveilance of southern border. South an accident happend with helocopter? Asasination cooperation. NATO owned Turkish army - israhell.

[@33276344]

💞💕❤️♥️👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨💯

[@pieterwoerden2701]

Dit is inderdaad een zeer gevaarlijke ontwikkeling. Wat er op het slachtveld gebeurd is, denk ik, is van minder belang, vergeet niet dat ( het verzwakken van Rusland zodat ze niet meer een dergelijke oorlog kunnen voeren) dit altijd het doel van de US en NATO geweest. This is indeed a very dangerous development. What happened on the battlefield, I think, is less important, remember that (weakening Russia so that they can no longer wage such a war) this has always been the goal of the US and NATO.

[@deadpoolguy283]

@@pieterwoerden2701 USSA and Nazo bit off more than they can chew this Time.

[@trappedbehindenemylines]

Russia needs to take the gloves off and unleash everything in their arsenal to put this to an end

[@Zeptus1488]

I'm not sure they have significantly more than that left in their arsenal (that would be useful in this war, as older tanks and other equipment isn't really useful). Going all in would probably be a huge gamble and not guarantee success while leaving other parts of their country unprotected.

[@lilacer6841]

​@@Zeptus1488what? Are you OK?

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

@@Zeptus1488 Russia made up for all the losses in equipment and even increased the production of tanks and SPG... Ammunition production unquestionably supports this operation in Ukraine, and an average of 1,500 volunteers join the army per day... Russia not only did not weaken its fighting ability, but in these three years it significantly improved it!

[@antjeschwarz7874]

​@@lilacer6841No, he's not. And poorly aware of the truth. Peace

[@mamadoudou2659]

​@@Zeptus1488my man idk why everyone critizying u, i dont see wat u said was bad and delusionnal, u just gived your opinion on the subject and i support that, but i think russia could be a bit more agressive that she is rn

[@Aimercesttous]

Looking forward for you analysis Sir!

[@daisuke6072]

I support Russia's cause in this war, but the fact is NATO has been upping the ante intervening on the assumption Russia will not act on its threats to retaliate. Now they have attacked a nuclear early warning station it seems. If Russia still fails to respond meaningfully I have to say I have little sympathy for the dire state its leaders will find it in. Restraint is one thing but you don't appease bullies.

[@Olegstuff21986]

Russia doesn't respond right away but rather looks for when the time is right and then does maximum damage.

[@michalzajic2555]

So russia can bomb anything in Ukraine from Airfield to dams and residental buildings . And Ukraine cant bomb russia?! From what pink ponny planet you are texting?!

[@rgw5991]

Russia can't lose... Only suffer and then turn all that suffering around and destroy their abusers. making them regret ever having done it in the first place. This is historically their behaviour. USA is going to have to be reminded of this.

[@mariorossi4050]

is like a chess game and russians are the best in this game. don t worry that russia will do chess mate

[@stephenvanwoert2447]

@@Olegstuff21986 So, when will the time be right to respond to the Nord Stream sabotage?

[@ivanstepanovic1327]

I watched a video where the Russians showed captured Ukrainian drone called "Baba Yaga" or "Vampire", not sure... It had Starlink on it and the Russians removed Starlink equipment. It is safe to presume that they studied it and now know how to deal with it.

[@GeoPoliticsCommentry]

But with whom to negotiate? That’s a peculiar question, I agree. We realize that the legitimacy of the incumbent head of the [Ukrainian] state has expired,” -Putin I guess unconditional surrender may happen before Ukraine is completely RUkraine.

[@katymeigs5290]

Yanikovich is the last legitimate head of state of Ukraine.

[@stehouse]

BIg problem is that West can always change their mind of Zelensky legitimacy. His actions now aren't supported by anything, he's literally usurper now and his support from Europe and US doesn't mean anything in grand scheme of things. What I mean by that is even if Zelensky calls surrender, next president can say "hey, you know that Zelensky guy? Yeah, well, he's not legitimate, so his decisions as president are illegal and now we at war again, glhf". And I think because of that West would use Zelensky even more, till he's dead or something

[@michalzajic2555]

On russian side if Putin have international court warrant he cant negotiate ether LOL

[@pong9000]

@@michalzajic2555 Because Putin can't meet a Ukrainian delegation in Istanbul or Minsk, you think? Oh right, the negotiation must be held in Perth where he will be arrested, how stupid of me.

[@TheMrmango69]

@@pong9000 lmao Perth made me laugh ngl most dummies on here wouldn't even know where that is, probably think its in Switzerland

[@mattatuckmanful]

So glad my taxdollars are all going overseas to fund a war we dont belong in…

[@theseldomseenkid6251]

FJB and his 10%.

[@uhadme]

#4 Thank You 👍

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

You're welcome!

[@MrGiedriokas]

That's exactly what fuck around and find out is. Attacking strategic objects is playing with fire. Don't give pikachu face when you see a little shroom cloud in your city.

[@pong9000]

At least Canada can move Trudeau to a remote area where the blast will not harm Canadians.

[@youjustreadthis897]

Gotta love "surprised" Pikachu face

[@andrewkrolikiewicz6522]

One second to midnight on atomic war clock.

[@Clapper74]

@@pong9000We don’t care about that clown. It was a vote he would be sent to front lines.

[@johnmccready6752]

For anyone who believes Ukraine should have any weapon to attack the territory of Russia. Japan did not have nuclear weapons in 1945 when the US destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This could well be the fate of Kiev if the US and NATO do not stop this aggression.

[@bobjones-bt9bh]

NATO *IS* the aggression. Name ONE SINGLE defensive weapons system NATO has in abundance. They barely have ANY even air defense systems- ALL THEIR INVENTORY is offensive in nature

[@DajeilGelian]

Galician loss rate is now at 11200 which is 1600 a day up from 1000 in April and 900 in March. In June the loss rate will reach 2000 a day. This will then mean 60'000 losses a month. Russia recruits 30'000 new soldiers every month, while the Ukraine loses twice that many. Every child knows that this is quickly leading to collapse. If Russia opens Cherny and Sumy fronts losses will reach 2500 a day at least in July and if in August Russia complements this by paralyzing Kiev and taking Odessa then loss rates in August and September will reach up to 5000 a day which means one full brigade every day and one dividion every 3 days and one army corps in 2 weeks and a whole army in 6 weeks. There will be no army left in September, and the new recruits will increase the loss rate dramatically as 3months training double the loss rate and 6 weeks again and below 3 weeks you have a 5x higher loss rate compared to a soldier that was trained 6 months or a year. All simple arithmetics show that the Ukraine is ended in September.

[@glenndavis4452]

The only option the Russians have for now is to win the conventional war declared by US/NATO/Ukraine. But, what will that lead to ?

[@OneShadow7]

They are brilliant strategist they failed to defeat Russia in war, in economy and politics so naturally now they are going to take on China which is even bigger and stronger economy and has 10x times bigger population.

[@michalzajic2555]

On feb 24 2022 Not a single generalissimus in ruzziaexpect Ukraine will be existing in 2024 And russia will be stuck fighting in Donetsk oblast LOL

[@pong9000]

@@michalzajic2555 You refer to General Milley's hysterical "72 hours to take Kiev" testimony to congress.

[@michalzajic2555]

@@pong9000 No i refer to that generalissimus putin he said if he like he can take Kiev in 2 weeks. And that 50km collum of russian vehicles stuck for 2 weeks in front of Kiev was doing just fine LMFAO

[@pong9000]

@@michalzajic2555 The purpose was to force treaty negotiations, and it did.

[@OneShadow7]

@@michalzajic2555 neither did they expect Russia alone to demilitarize entire NATO and its vassals and send Petrodollar into retirement 😆😆

[@sarahmadsen2944]

Russia will be The best No1 🌏❤💪🙏🙏 welcome to Thailand

[@johannespaulfrank3441]

This is a war of attrition, my dear friend. It doesn't matter, if a tree line has been conquered or not. Dima, you should better report about the losses on both sides on a daily basis instead, - if it is possible through the fog of war. Yesterday you reported, that Ukrainian losses in the Kharkov front are about 1,500 per day. This is more important.

[@johntowers1213]

when it comes to casualty figures for either side you might as well sit and pull numbers out of a hat....the only thing you can say with cast iron certainty is that any figure either side gives is dead wrong...

[@vanjamenadzer]

@@johntowers1213 And one more thing you can be certain about - whatever the RU losses are, UA are worse. Most deaths are caused by arty, MLRS, mines and glide bombs. And with RU ramped up usage of big bombs means that a lot of poor souls were torn apart into pieces and many of them will never be brought back to their families for a burial...

[@alfran1]

Exactly. Over and over again we are looking hypnotic to area changes of the battelfield. But as long loss ratio is stong on russian side there is no need for russia to hurry up. Dima should make instead statistically forecasts on which time ucrainian army is so weak that the front is collapsing automatically.

[@whukriede]

Simplicius has an important and enlightening piece today on Substack. The situation is becoming increasingly dangerous. Meanwhile some people in the West seem to not fear anything.

[@zloymyx2486]

Они не боятся потому, что жизни обывателей для них ничего не значат. Более того, им выгодны подобные конфликты по всему миру. Они поддерживают статус кво. Даже сотни миллионов жизней ничего для них не значат. Ведь речь идет о власти. Безграничная власть для людей, которые благодаря достижениям современной медицины потеряли связь с реальностью и осознание того что их жизнь тоже закончится.

[@whukriede]

@@zloymyx2486 Yes, right.

[@Misterioso62]

Ukraine's heart is Odessa and there are lot of Western investments as well so its obvious where Russia can retaliate if it doesn't want to use tactical nuclear weapons

[@johntowers1213]

Russia considers Odessa a historic Russian city though so its going to be loathed to flatten it for a bunch of reasons...but I get your point.

[@RobertKing-yi3vm]

Thanks for the update!

[@sg8539]

Thanks Dima.

[@MrGhostTube]

Countries are responsible for how the weapons they sell are used by the people they sell them to under international law.

[@pong9000]

They're also responsible when they select the targets and guidance through their own military satellites! When Lewis of Ontario pilots his remote controlled driverless car through the streets of Washington DC I'd say he's responsible. But for now: Pentagon says no, he's not responsible.

[@pong9000]

@@ZugZugMahogny Thank you for giving us wiggle room. There are a lot of militias, private contractors, volunteers whose launch of missiles we really can't be held responsible for.

[@bobjones-bt9bh]

lol, the US does not obey any law

[@pong9000]

@@ZugZugMahogny Nor are you accountable to any treaty unless your sovereign and legitimate government freely entered that treaty.

[@gerasmus]

Слова Россия!!!🇷🇺

[@luisjeronimo1484]

Russia can use Syrian ,libian or yemen flags or even islamic state flags. How difficult his having several drones to attack USA oil platforms ,buk oil and gas platforms , Alaska and Canada early warning radars ?

[@marcogianese2289]

They are not dumb enough to attack the US.

[@zloymyx2486]

Вы зрите в корень. Анонимные атаки от лица непонятных организаций с неопределенным статусом. Неизвестно кто их на самом деле финансирует, обеспечивает информацией, снабжает оружием. Войны будущего, это даже не "прокси".

[@bernardfrank9247]

Thank you 👍

[@sarahmadsen2944]

my support to RUSSIA❤🙏

[@carlosasosa4293]

I work in prostatic factory in Mexico, since last year we are making and selling 4000 units a day when we used to make and sell 50¡ keep it up boys, I want a new car

[@SvenjaIpsen]

Manufacturing prostheses?

[@Aussie-nd7si]

So nato assistance to Ukraine makes nato an active participant too

[@george123-ni1sx]

Assistance is active participation when you have your own people put on the uniform of another nation along with weapons,technology and advanced satellite intelligence. You have a narrow mind for a narrow meaning of your definition of "active" Only a Ukrainian could be that narrow. Mental problem. Putin is no fool and easily sees through this nonsense of uniforms, weapons and intelligence suppliers.

[@beatrixkiddo3867]

You misunderstood the comment. The commenter just used MANY fewer words to make the same point as you, but you had to write an entire paragraph to describe. ​@@george123-ni1sx

[@beatrixkiddo3867]

That's what the commenter is saying. Except they got right to the point, and you had to write an entire paragraph to make the same point​@@george123-ni1sx

[@joescott6469]

Thank you

[@dorisganz1631]

It looks like we will see an escalation very soon!

[@mv69969]

WWIII is getting closer and closer !

[@hunarqadr1802]

Simple if Russia damages a bridge it means Russia trys to capture that territory on his side of the bridge , but when Ukraine destroys the bridge it means Ukraine is runnng and try to delay Russian progress toward the Ukrainian side of the bridge.

[@janineskywalker527]

Thanks Dima. J

[@josephmontjoly5211]

Merci à vous !

[@glenndavis4452]

The turtle tank was probably trying to go full speed through a minefield. Many mines have a delay to make sure they go off under the vehicle. There’s video of another one that was disabled that way.

[@2fathomsdeeper]

The tank probably hit a super mine or 3-4 mines buried on top of each other so they all go at once. By the look of the explosion, that's probably what it hit.

[@andrewkrolikiewicz6522]

Ellenskyy's presidency is over. He has got a new position - " NATO's GAULEITER of Ukraine ".

[@habtomhaile9321]

Sir, you are wrong on repeating your assertions about Russia’s strategic objects being destroyed by the enemy Ukraine or nato and you based your analysis on Ukraine’s claims so be careful when you make such big claims based on Ukraine’s always false information

[@zloymyx2486]

Время от времени украинцы действительно наносят ощутимый урон российским объектам ударами беспилотников. Но это лишь продлевает агонию, позволяя украинским медиа хоть немного подогреть градус оптимизма тем обывателям, кто еще им верит.

[@DreamteamCarlo]

13:22 'Without the support of China, Russia could not have attacked Ukrainian cities and civilian targets the way that is has.' This is based on what? With or without China, Russia could have done the same or easily 5 times mores damage to Ukrainian cities and civilian targets. The problem is not that 'we' are losing the war in Ukrainian cities, but on the front lines. That's why there has to be constant escalation, 'asymmetric warfare', etc.

[@pong9000]

Ukrainian drones are made with Chinese motors, among other parts. As are Russian. Washington should just be forthright to the American people. Admit they're still buying uranium from Russia, admit everything.

[@sickotwist9802]

Great work👍

[@WorldLeader-n1b]

I don't think france would use nukes if Germany was attacked, think about that.

[@大豪鈴木]

勝利の栄光を偉大な正義のロシアに！😊

[@FlamespeedyAMV]

I have no idea how Russia has such restraint

[@paulmicks7097]

Excellent updates , Thank you Dima ... World temperature rising.

[@antonijobakija6553]

Putin, allegedly, proposed a day or two ago, to frozen the current situation! 🤣 On what planet is he living? Until one of the sides of the conflict enters Kiev or Moscow, the war will not end.

[@silenciothequiet3471]

Where did you get that information? Reuters? AP?

[@RtFa-ol7vd]

Но в Киев он уже не собирается. Цель достигнута---он продлил период своего пребывания на посту легитимного

[@marc-andrebrun8942]

my guess is even worse, because of Thucydides : the Pelloponnese's war between Athens and Sparta, 25 centuries ago. today we have the same pattern between Washington and Moscou. in 404 BC, the spartans flatten the wall around Athens! so my guess is : this war never end until the Pentagone in Washington is flatten!

[@BetyarPali]

There is zero chance that Ukraine will enter Moscow, but if Ukraine wants to continue this unwinnable war, Russia will soon occupy Kharkiv, and Odessa.

[@johntowers1213]

@@marc-andrebrun8942 I think it more likely the Ukrainian Government simply folds under the constant stress, leading to a negotiated deal by whoever takes over... its only the Western support that's currently keeping the Ukrainian government bodies afloat and the point will eventually be reached where the population no longer has the governments back in this conflict....the new mobilization laws, power shortages the lack of elections or even a well defined end goal and a host of other related issues are really starting to way down on the average man on the street....sooner or later I think there will be a serious attempt to oust the sitting Ukrainian government..ie within the next 2 years...tops

[@RickyRisnandar]

I think nato is expecting the fatigue of the Russian before they enter Ukraine

[@tabasco-jf7eb]

They never ask them self when Russia starts to target NATO FACILITIES outside of UKISTAN,then they will start to CRY >IS NOT FAIR

[@hollowgonzalo4329]

I assume the long range missile plot along with the ambiguity inherent to it (yeah it's totally the Ukrainians picking and choosing all the targets bro wink wink) is more or less meant as a last ditch attempt to basically blackmail Russia into a conflict freeze on terms more favorable to the West because if they refuse then we'll start lobbing long range missiles deep into their territory at vital strategic targets and I guess the assumption/hope is either that the Russians would never dare respond in kind or perhaps they know there's a chance of it but actually want them too so they can then try paint them as the aggressor attacking NATO countries with missiles to justify further escalation still on their part such as sending in a contingent of ground forces or declaring a no fly zone over Ukraine or something. I don't think even that would do much to sway Westren public's to be more willing to fight Russia directly at this stage though because most people will recognize that we were the first to start trying to carpet bomb Moscow with atacms and frankly most people as well have been checked out since like 2022 and have moved into the next current thing long ago so they won't like that their politicians pulled such bullshit to drag this thing back to the precipice of WW3 again since they're sore losers.

[@kamilstrygner3994]

This will only intensify.. indeed. They know Russia will not retaliate symmetric way.

[@zeerocool]

12:30 I'm not sure why you bothered showing this video -- you can't tell anything about what happened, what blew up, or any context. You can basically tell any story about it.

[@dr.nimanandarijal9812]

America and European should play role for negotiations. You have dissolved the peace negotiation.

[@buddhaspriest]

Maybe the real war was against bridges all along

[@jonathanmercer7109]

I'm frankly a little surprised at the seeming lack of Russian air-defenses for such critical locations. It's not like the western robber-barons haven't been signalling their intentions.

[@marcogianese2289]

Being the largest country on Earth has many pros but also many cons.

[@jonathanmercer7109]

@@marcogianese2289 For sure. Watching the video of ATACMS missiles heading towards Crimea, let alone the drone that it was reportedly hit the nuclear warning radar, I just am surprised at such apparently super-capable defences missing known-quantity incoming munitions.

[@PhoenixRising82672]

Russia needs to stop playing around and bring out the big weapons

[@benjammin3381]

U mean the nukes? Putin clearly do not want to escalate to that. Its all just retoric to prevent Nato from attacking while he does what he wants.

[@Schurk-x3d]

Nucleair weapons you mean, they have brought all other wespons already to the fight

[@antjeschwarz7874]

Happy you are not responsible for what they need to do and what kind of weapons are going to be used. ❤❤❤

[@plum4620]

Chemical?

[@Schurk-x3d]

@@plum4620 Ukraine has chemical and biocal weapons also

[@XavierAway]

Is Putin bluffing when he says he’s willing to negotiate for peace?

[@jayfelsberg1931]

3:63 - Not thee first time we've had that feeling

[@h3w45]

Ukries playing a dumb game

[@hongry-life]

NATO also, Stoltenberg has become insane.

[@hundun5604]

~12:30 Anti-tank mines maybe.

[@xaviersphilostube8718]

Jens Stoltenberrg is just a crazy dog of war ! What a pity !

[@fifi23o5]

No, he is just a lapdog. A pug, obedient but annoying and actually harmless.

[@28282222]

Don’t understand why Russia doesn’t try a breakthrough and encirclement attack, on a large scale. They have shown they can breakthrough. This broad front approach makes no sense to me unless they just want to weaken Ukr strength. It will take 10 years to get to Kiev one field at a time,

[@SvenjaIpsen]

They might want just that - in order NOT to have to march on Kiev, but for the Ukr government to surrender long before.

[@markhughes7927]

Excellent!

[@mv69969]

Huraaa, finally we have a lot of interesting updates!

[@Asgardsteve1]

The initial impact field on the turtle tank is way too big for a mine or anti tank weapon its been hit by something way more powerful, look at the burning ground objects that are nowhere near the tank suggesting an area effect weapon

[@malcolmt7883]

Maybe they should make sea urchin tank with spikes all over it.

[@ulrikerudel6859]

I think noth parties want a stabilzed front at Kahrkkv. The Russians to keep the buffer zone and have a target rich enviroment close to them (stretching UKR troops) and best Ukraine can do is to stop Russian advancements - no real recapture possibilities

[@terrybriand5360]

I find it hard to believe Russia would put strategic defenses in a high rise, may as well paint a target on it. Misinformation I would say

[@patrickkinney4998]

NATO tells Ukraine it can attack Russia with its weapons implicates NATO in this war. It's stupid to think Russia isn't going to get tired of it and do something.

[@nerinine]

This will end bad.

[@rilmehakonen9688]

Yes, good will triumph.

[@bcc1955]

This is what early stages of WW3 look like :-(

[@mehmetvelicangil3458]

Russia can buy extra sam systems from China-Iran to protect rafineries-strategic sites. Sellers wont be part of the conflict as these are defensive items to be used only inside Russia protecting strategic sites. However if ceasefire signal comes from Ukraine Russia having the upper hand needs to accept the freeze of frontline and vice versa. Otherwise conflict wont finish. If there is a good ceasefire monitoring system it can hold although both countries will inevitably rearm. There can be guarantor countries for Russia as well if Ukraine destroys the ceasefire ater rearming other countries can openly sell uavs and other offensive military equipment to Russia for example as part of agreement. That can hold the ceasefire. The key would be having a ceasefire monitoring system that is good enough.

[@g_1673]

Deep buried pre-placed mine. That's what that looks like... ~500lbs

[@janineskywalker527]

Night Vision such a useful invention. Konstantinivka 🎇. J.

[@doppeltkohlensaures]

These reports remind me of the movie Groundhog Day. The names of the 2-horse villages may change but the action is pretty much the same.

[@ri-oj1ul]

Can someone please explain to me why Western aircraft that are being used to assist/coordinate targeting are still flying and are not at the bottom of the sea?

[@hirok8941]

Once iodine rationing begins, Russia has one option

[@blitzdesign4312]

My opinion about western counties attacking through Ukrainan Russian strategic places is a good thing for Russians. Because this is the best chance for Russians to find a way to stop these missiles or develop their radar system and anti-misle system. It's like NATO giving a free trial to Russia to get ready. If the war broke out the Russians will have a way to counter NATO's missile while NATO will not have time to learn about Russian's advanced missiles.

[@lahdahnowens7490]

Double Standards by NATO, it's okay to support Ukraine but NOT okay to support The Russian Federation in this SMO war....🤔

[@m3bmuadib]

I'm sure several Americans got a huge pay rise for setting this trap so effectively

[@MartinBerisso]

seems like the second bridge "destroyed by Russia" .. there was an ucranian truck, we can presume they were mining the bridge to destroy it when the truck got hit, maybe operators were not in the truck and they were able to finish the mission and destroy the bridge.. ? is that possible?

[@florenthamen1592]

Z from France

[@charlescutts9906]

Hates the west but lives in the west…makes sense

[@krasav]

C'mon Putinski....unleash the hounds !!

[@bkxt]

Vodka, connecting people

[@elleoliver6070]

Good if the friendship lasts even after you get sober!

[@zero1breaker]

both sides destroying bridges is the funny news. 😂

[@bobjones-bt9bh]

the rules of proxy war have ALWAYS been that the war stays IN the proxy country. When the war is brought by the proxy to the homeland using implements provided by the principal, that is a direct action involving the principal as a participant. N. Vietnam was never given missiles with which to strike the mainland USA

[@giselamalik8693]

This Attack was one to much. But behind are the war -"driver" first class.

[@rickyleb590]

DEEP RUSSIAN PENETRATION

[@JiříRys-v6s]

Deep NATO penetration😂

[@sxe1nuar]

How many times has Musk said them not to use it for military purposes? 🤦‍♂️

[@Pavlovsobaka]

12:40 that’s a heavy explosion. Must have been a JDAM. I don’t know but doesn’t seem like an ATGM.

[@danielanusiem-nzenwa8535]

The word "Hypocrisy" is synonymous to and can be interchanged with the word " 🇺🇸 "

[@大豪鈴木]

シオニストを殲滅する正義のプーチン閣下に、勝利の栄光を！😊

[@Anil-zg9gh]

Z

[@chriscleland7008]

The real enemy of Russia.

[@大豪鈴木]

@@Anil-zg9gh ありがとうございます。

[@TodaTruth]

What is USA 🇺🇸 doing in front of Russian 🇷🇺 Border, Ukraine is cooked

[@johnsmith91528]

👋🦌

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

👋🏻🇷🇺♥️