Structuralism

[@amoalgoldito]

This lecture helped me incredibly to understand structuralism. Thank you Professor Alberhasky!

[@skfardin65]

ok

[@محمدإبراهيمخليلالزيتونسيناءجبر]

Four Aspects :Parole-Langue , Signifier & Signified , Synchrony-Diachrony , and paradigmatic -syntagmatic .Note: Words/sound images are Signifier .

[@محمدإبراهيمخليلالزيتونسيناءجبر]

Binary Oppositions: Wet/Dry , Raw/Cooked etc .

[@skfardin65]

what is langue?

[@iantojones3]

Thank you so much for this, I understand what Structuralism is so much more clearly now!

[@nurbasaran6099]

Thank you so much professor this lecture is a life saver.

[@languagetv4756]

Thank you Professor Alberhasky!

[@clnl1422]

is there a difference between structuralism in linguistics and structuralism in literary theory and criticism?

[@skfardin65]

do not know

[@hadirezai674]

Generaly speaking, structuralism is somehow a linguistic view of literary criticism. Think of it that way...

[@Ali_b1009]

Thank you so much, this has saved me! :D I have an exam on Tuesday and I'm stressing out! I wish you covered more other theories that will be in my exam :(

[@skfardin65]

ok

[@sumitrabhatta6190]

Great lecture thanks 🙏🙏🇳🇵

[@alaatcod7827]

That was very helpful, can't stop saying thank you!

[@siiriinkoffee1580]

This was was very helpful, thanks a lot Matt Alberhasky

[@auroraorha]

I am not student of social sciences but i find these things fascinating

[@Valdermont13]

Comprehensive.....very comprehensive....Thanks...

[@dibble2005]

Thanks Matt. Very informative.

[@RT-mp1kg]

Thank you for sharing Professor🙂

[@ranashahidfarooqkhan7724]

Thank you professor

[@bunnis122]

great lecture, thanks.

[@princeicio]

Very interesting video. But I think (witch/which) is an example of homophony and not homonymy. Please do look up the definitions of these semantic relation terms. They're constantly mixed up!

[@sommerkleidchen]

I also think he mixed up signifier and signified

[@atharvaradhya0912]

He gave the example of witch/which to infer the meaning from context ...an yes it is homophone!

[@Gee-gg3th]

how i analysis a text using structuralism? plzzzzz tell me

[@afrizallutfirdaus41]

wew thanks for the explanation profesor..

[@kookiekookie6141]

is their any reference that you can give us??

[@truecrimepodcaster]

I have to write a paper about this in class and it's so difficult to understand.. waaaaah!

[@datrevmeister]

Well, how did it go?

[@ractacsquad]

Thanks bro! very useful and clear

[@カシスオレンジ-e3q]

Why is Johnny Sins teaching philosophy all of a sudden JK. Loved the lecture

[@mohammednabil1136]

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[@navajohnny76]

cool stuff

[@Praveen.Poonia01]

what's the difference between structuralism and Post structuralism ?

[@skfardin65]

ok i will tell

[@sophiaoconnor2465]

I appreciate you so much! So helpful!

[@OctagonalGolbat]

The word 'tree' isn't arbitrary, it's arborary :p

[@skfardin65]

arbitrary means?

[@infinitewithinfinite8641]

thank you professor.

[@Alisha.millet]

Thankyou, it helped alot.

[@doaasuleiman]

than you very much . this was very helpful ^.^

[@goagilfans9067]

Thank you so much, this was very helpful , You look like johny sins XD

[@rashiverma6271]

good one

[@amanilaataoui1541]

I thought the same hahaha

[@shadyaalaasar3981]

^^ good job

[@pamngamkhamrang9492]

thank you it helps alot

[@afeishaleshmore6801]

than u so much. this helped a lot.

[@bomterdirchi1979]

👍

[@jamorrianparker2447]

Wait I thought structuralism came from Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Tichener

[@mattalberhasky9952]

They were famous for structuralism in psychology, not linguistics.

[@aboriginalalex]

0:49 jumpscare

[@Kristian-ql6ei]

Johnny sins