Рет қаралды 13
STRUCTURED AUTONOMY FOR DEVELOPMENT TEAMS
Unleashing the full potential of development teams often necessitates a delicate balance. Unrestricted autonomy can lead to significant upfront and ongoing infrastructure costs, steep learning curves, and inconsistent API development.
.
To optimize this dynamic, we propose a tiered approach to team autonomy:
1. Fully Restrictive
Centralized infrastructure management (monitoring, alerting, CI/CD) ensures consistency, security, and compliance. Rigorous API guidelines and best practices foster interoperability.
2. Freedom with Boundaries
Empower teams to select programming languages and database technologies while maintaining overarching architectural principles and compatibility.
3. Complete Autonomy
Grant full control over release processes, schedules, and local development environments. This level is suitable for mature teams with proven track records.
.
Determining the appropriate level of autonomy hinges on factors such as the size and expertise of the DevOps/SRE team, the developers' seniority, and the company's overall culture.
.
By carefully calibrating autonomy, organizations can harness the benefits of agile development while mitigating risks and ensuring alignment with broader business objectives.
.
Mas Irsyad, a Software Engineer with experience at a well-regarded company SuperApp (YC W18), will share his valuable insights from his course and the field.
~~~
Like & repost to show your support, and follow for regular updates from our talented engineering team. Join us on this inspiring journey of continuous improvement! Gain insights & knowledge to help you grow in your career!
/ @super-engineering
.
#JadiSuper #SuperApp #SuperEngineering #SuperAppEngineering #SoftwareEngineering #devops #agile #team autonomy #softwaredevelopment #ITmanagement #EngineeringManagement