Stuart Talbott: Venus - a Comprehensive Review | Thunderbolts

[@skiracer]

What a well done addition to the Thunderbolts library. Thanks Stuart you are the best narrator ever.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

ludicrous hyperbole

[@robertsteele474]

​@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Pompous megalomaniac.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@robertsteele474 the irony...

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Which part is hyperbole and/or ludicrous? I think a lot of us think Stuart is the best narrator in TP.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@Kaimelar8 The best in TP? That might well be the case. But he said "best ever"

[@jerome2022]

This is why i barely studied astronomy in school. I waited for this channel!

[@davejones7632]

You mean science was too hard, so you have to revert to impossible fairy tales from clueless mythologists?

[@JackBlack-py4en]

@@davejones7632 Not sure how you conclude that they are clueless if you study the TBP videos. While you disagree with some or all of their conclusions, can't you at least appreciate their scientific approach? For example, the Safire Project.

[@davejones7632]

@@JackBlack-py4en _"Not sure how you conclude that they are clueless"_ By understa nding basic physics, and the laws thereof. _"can't you at least appreciate their scientific approach?"_ Lol! There is no science. This nonsensical cult was formed by Velikovskians, and that rubbish has nothing to do with science. _"For example, the Safire Project."_ Which was a scam. And was supposedly started to investigate a scientifically impossible 'model' of the Sun. Which is trivially shown to be impossible. And then they started making fake claims about transmutation, for which they have zero evidence. As their own plasma physicist said, they were making 'fraudulent claims'.

[@jerome2022]

@davejones7632 nope 4.0 in science didn't believe in flat earth. It isn't until you understand planets are independent bodies "following " the Sun like a clock that these ideals become real.

[@davejones7632]

@@jerome2022 Planets are obviously independent! Who told you otherwise? They are born from the same disk of gas and dust as the star. As observed.

[@trevorsneath4665]

Excellent essay Stuart. Thank you.

[@TheDAT9]

I am in my 70s and I am having to scrub out all the crap that was forced into me, virtually from birth, and especially from the "education system." Over the last few years I have learned so much about the nature of The Universe, our Solar system, and our human place in it. Our story has been deliberately distorted to suit the few who rule over us and treat us like mushrooms. Thanks this, and many other blogs which have provided links to sources of reading material, I would never have discovered otherwise. I believe the Electric Universe ties in very well with what I have learned about the spiritual nature of the Universe as we perceive it.

[@davejones7632]

So, you couldn't understand real science so fell for impossible nonsense on youtube? Never mind.

[@TheDAT9]

@@davejones7632 So, you are completely and utterly indoctrinated The system does work on most people Covid proved that. I bet you followed the science, eh.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@TheDAT9 but you were not fooled, eh

[@robertsteele474]

@@davejones7632 Ad hominem attacks are fallacious arguments and not accepted as proofs in scientific argumentation.

[@davejones7632]

@@robertsteele474 But you have no science. So.....?

[@Snailmailtrucker]

When people say that if we don't stop Global Pollution that the Earth will wind up like Venus is today... I have to say that the Earth has already been like Venus is today (when it was a Newly Birthed Planet) .. and if Venus can survive what's coming... It may end up being like the Earth is Today ! *Love your Stuff Stuart !*

[@pootthatbak2578]

The comets that may have brought earth water, are no longer actively passing thru the neighborhood. There is no water under venuses surface, a dry core was mentioned. Alas poor venus😢

[@chyka9572]

@@pootthatbak2578 the water on Earth came from Saturn. Comets are Rocks

[@stephenburnage7687]

​@@chyka9572Can you explain that further?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

_if Venus can survive what's coming... It may end up being like the Earth is Today !_ what in the Lord's name do you mean?

[@davejones7632]

@@chyka9572 _"the water on Earth came from Saturn."_ Lol. No it didn't. _"Comets are Rocks"_ Nope, not even close.

[@grinnerwolff1]

Excellent exposition

[@patted44]

That was clear, concise and very informative. Thank you.

[@umfuli]

I accepted velikovsky back in the fifties when I was a teenager and have had no reason to doubt him since.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

perhaps one ought to dig a little deeper then

[@davejones7632]

I accepted it when my father introduced me to it when I was 10 or 11 years old. By the time I left high school I could see why it was complete nonsense. Then again, I studied physics, among other science. I guess Velikovsky's impossible fairy tales are something that appeals to those that struggled with actual science.

[@raycar1165]

We struggle with Scientism, not science.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@raycar1165 I rather suspect one man's science is another man's scientism

[@davejones7632]

@@raycar1165 Irony, much? You have no valid science. Nothing EU proposes is even possible. That is why it only exists on youtube, followed by non-scientists.

[@Jollyprez]

Should be noted that the whole Venusian "Runaway Greenhouse Effect" was spawned by Carl Sagan's doctoral thesis. Sagan never really refuted his idea, even after the plethora of evidence against it.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

You are confusing the terms refutation and retraction. What you wish to say about Sagan is that he never retracted the idea. And why should he? He was right.

[@davejones7632]

_"Should be noted that the whole Venusian "Runaway Greenhouse Effect" was spawned by Carl Sagan's doctoral thesis."_ Which was a follow-on from the work of Rupert Wildt in the 1940s who had predicted a hot Venus due to the high CO2 content of the atmosphere.

[@Jollyprez]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Horsefeathers! The whole concept has been thoroughly investigated and refuted!

[@Jollyprez]

@@davejones7632 Except that's not why Venus is hot. CO2 doesn't have that great an effect.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@Jollyprez I wish it were so, but we do not get to pick and choose facts, alas.

[@WarpedSpeed]

If I lived a thousand years I would still be learning, our past is so so interesting, I just wish we knew what was, we can always hope to be enlightened in the future.

[@PM9Video]

So fascinating

[@sandyacombs]

Stu, it's great to hear your voice on Space News again.

[@cameddy4081]

Dr Talbott - thank you for this and standing for an open minded approach that is “different “ than conventional perspectives. So refreshing !! Because electricity is so scaleable and is so ubiquitous, eg it keeps the phospholipid membranes is our cells / organelles functioning as they do , in a liquid solution no less , there is static electricity if you rub a balloon on your head / hair , there is house current , 220 ,440, etc , lightning , and so on up to the galactic current sheets - will you please help us , with your wonderful perspective, and do a special focus on Birkeland currents and more specifically” magnetars “ ( and what “we” know about them and and how they may have effected all sorts of things (geology ) etc. here on earth, and maybe Venus also of course ) Greatly appreciate your efforts and this production , thank you 🙏🌏✌️

[@davejones7632]

_"Dr Talbott - thank you for this and standing for an open minded approach that is “different “ than conventional perspectives."_ You mean it i scientifically impossible woo that violates the laws of physics? And he isn't a doctor of anything, and has no scientific qualifications whatsoever. Just like his dad.

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@davejones7632So? Ad hominems are for losers Dave.

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@davejones7632have you tried argumenting without any fallacies for a change?

[@XXfea]

Great stuff. Please make more

[@corkygoss7403]

I had not seen the "twin vortices" you mention at 4:10. Thanks for that. That structure brings to mind Bob Greenyer's work on scale invariant vortex/anti-vortex dynamics in Nature and therefore in LENR. Have a look. Cheers.

[@Salmon_Rush_Die]

Ah that's fascinating!

[@ImagineMySurprise510]

I am grateful for the new graphic that shows the view of Venus and Saturn in a more understandable way. I've always had trouble understanding what was being shown in previous videos, whether the polar alignment should be seen like a stack of coins one on top of another. I'd love to have this clearly explained at a grade school level so more people could understand it.

[@davejones7632]

Grade school is where it belongs. Only someone who has never got beyond grade school could believe this nonsense.

[@robertsteele474]

@@davejones7632 Ad hominem attacks are fallacious arguments and not accepted as proofs in scientific argumentation.

[@davejones7632]

@@robertsteele474 You have no science. Ergo, we are not arguing about science.

[@ZJhontu1]

Man I love the TP.

[@JimmyMatis-h9y]

...I wish that didn't induce memories of Beavis & Butthead 😢 ⚡🤓👍

[@craigf2696]

​@@JimmyMatis-h9y Why not!?!? I'm laughing my bung off!!

[@christianpnorris]

Uhhh... hehuhuh.

[@PlasmaOscillations]

@@JimmyMatis-h9y I'm trying really hard to hold back a "for my bunghole" comment on OP

[@jonnamechange6854]

@@christianpnorris Toilet Paper is great

[@Kaimelar8]

I loved it! Great summary,!

[@gamebent]

Excellent. Thank you.

[@TheTimeshadows]

Wonderful. Keep up the great work.

[@TheTimeshadows]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x lol Corrected.

[@WW-bt3tx]

I like the theory that Venus was born from Jupiter, what if Earth was born the same way.

[@elwynr1108]

Saturn was our first Sun. According to the electric universe. The Saturn system merged with the Sun we have now. Causing a great cataclysm.

[@deepcosmiclove]

@@elwynr1108 That probably happened in conjuction with the Flood. That's why Noah observed the first rainbow.

[@PaxAlotin]

@@deepcosmiclove Interesting thought. Homer - the Greek Poet - referred to 'The Wine Dark Seas' -- Homer put into writing, an older record that was repeated over many thousands of years So - perhaps that line reflects a far older memory of what the oceans looked like under Saturnine light.

[@summerbrooks9922]

​@@elwynr1108it looks as if the term planet is not useful. Venus is a comet. Jupiter presents itself as a pulsar or radio source. Some say that the Earth is or was a brown dwarf, because it oscillates, like Jupiter and like every star out there.

[@nadahere]

In regards to stars forming/birthing planets/objects: See Dr. Robitaille's latest Sun model video: *_Solid Bodies and Mercury: The Perihelion Precession Explained!_* which now posits a solid core/surface of planar metallic hydrogen. This may then account for the precession of Mercury, nullifying Onerock's theories, especially when coupled with the fact that Eddington's light deflection observation was only due to diffraction through the solar limb, outside of which no bending occurred but should have, according to Onerock! See Edward Dowdye Jr in *_The Failed Attempts to Detect Macro Lensing E U Conference 2012_* [also atoms modeled as electric charges] My derivative corollary is that the upwelling of the intercalate layers of the Sun can cause mass ejecta which then form planets and other objects. If Jupiter was our early star then a similar process could have occurred there also when its electric potential changed and Jup lost its glow mode. The retrograde rotation and slowing down of the rotation would indicate that Venus started with the retro rotation when it came out of Saturn's influence but once captured by the Sun the new Birkeland current it acquired from the Sun was in opposition to this rotation and is now correcting/reversing the rotation, heating the planet like an overloaded motor.

[@jdehaan001]

Excellent report, sir. This came at a good time, as I'm currently 3/4ths the read through Velikovsky's, 'Worlds In Collision'.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Stephen Jay Gould wrote, “The Velikovsky affair raises what is perhaps the most disturbing question about the public impact of science. How is a layman to judge rival claims of supposed experts? Any person with a gift for words can spin a persuasive argument about any subject not in the domain of a reader’s personal expertise.” Leroy Ellenberger notes, more pointedly, “The less one knows about science, the more plausible Velikovsky’s scenario appears.”

[@doctorofart]

Brilliant. Huge eu fan This video caused an epiphany regarding the Saturn Sky. My first thought was it would have to be a long term effect in the sky to be so well documented. Then I thought how does a planet always point its face at us, like the moon, and it struck. I knew it had to be a 6 pointed star and I knew why. The pole of Saturn is an impact crater with a solid metallic planet core lodged into the crater, weighing and effecting the affection to another planet. Like the moon is affected with the earth. It is a magnetic attraction (affection) to our core, which keeps the moon facing us. I’m guessing the crater is on the far side and the bullet lodged deep into the moons plastic core on the side facing us. The heat signature of the moon is strong evidence for this. Therefore the 6 sided pole at one time was earth locked, magnetically. And the reason for the star being six sided is because a hexagram is an impact fracture zone signature. Cracking the deep crust in a perfect hex and immediately becoming filled with molten material. The entire six side pool was on fire and facing earth. 🌍

[@OneAccord1]

Hey! It’s me, not Stuart. Thanks for all you do to further our understanding of this electric universe.

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

in the slide of the bell and non undulating parker spiral ... which is the anode and which the cathode? sphere size vs direction of charge flow would be helpful for me to contemplate effects of the visual representation. many thx. 😇😎😇

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

if the smaller is the anode ... and IF the solar system is surrounded by an oort cloud ... then the widesdt point would be all around the anode in a hemispherical "v or ^" ... and the spinning of the moterized anode would give the undulateed wave form? then all (most) planets within the inner ring would reside within the narrow band between? with this representative picture as presented ALSO occuring from Sol to each planet as a EMF line ? and is this also happening between the earth and the moon? lotsa Q?s

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

looking further ... plasma lines from bifercated streams from small anode (if) are "hotter" closer in and are almost non bifercated for a length befor widening out. is that the planets habitation range?

[@davejones7632]

There is no anode or cathode. Lol.

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

@@davejones7632 then xplain for surely the spoon lights up somehow.

[@davejones7632]

@@Socrates-ti2dh Is that supposed to mean something? Lol! Dessert spoons? Teaspoons? Wetherspoons?

[@SmartStr33t]

Have you done a video on volcanoes? I reckon there will be a correlation between increased sun electrical activity and increased volcanic activity on earth. You already see unusually high instances of lightening striking actively erupting volcanoes. Also could look at the volcanic moon Io and it's relationship with Jupiter. I think our narrative about earthquakes, volcanoes and lightening is wrong, and they are intimately linked to the sun's electrical activity.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

why would you expect such a correlation?

[@raycar1165]

@SmartStr33t you’re correct. There is a correlation. Although it isn’t easy to compare the data from solar weather and the earth’s various ways of dealing with it. The trend is, in low electrical intake periods (grand solar minimum) there are more large earthquakes. When the electrical environment around the planet is high there are more floods. There are many variables; solar wind, sun spots, the distance and orbit of planets around us, the distance and orbit of the moon. As Wal used to say, there are no islands in space. It’s all connected. Stephen Smith did a write up about this in 2011 He explained how comparing the earth to a capacitor describes the build up of charge potential which can short out forming lightning, etc.. “…As the capacitor's charge increases, its electric field increases, stressing the insulator's ability to separate opposite charges. If a high enough potential grows between the two conductive plates, the dielectric insulator will fail and the capacitor will short circuit, suddenly releasing the stored energy..” Where the telluric current and the current of the ionosphere meets we experience extreme weather events.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@raycar1165 a link to the data, please?

[@raycar1165]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x soho data archive lmsal Lockheed Martin WDCCR World Data Center for Cosmic Rays NMDB Neutron Monitor Database NCEI National Centers for Environmental Information ESDE Earth System Data Explorer There are many more sites for data, none are very easy to navigate, most require downloading data, some are defunct and only hold specific information for specific years in specific locations.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@raycar1165 so, did you get the data and drew a scatter plot of the two variables you claim are correlated?

[@robneo888]

Excellent job

[@craigf2696]

The smoking gun, in support of a prehistoric highly sophisticated and technologically advanced civilization, is found in Egypt, in the form of stonework called pre-dynastic granite vases. The dimensional precision and sophisticated mathematics these vessels exhibit is nothing short of astonishing. For many of us crazies, they provide absolute unassailable proof of a " lost " civilization. Uncharted X YT channel has provide several hours of video on the topic. Time well spent...

[@corkygoss7403]

The vase crowd are on target scientifically, but remain at a loss. Bob Greenyer provides a working hypothesis on what methods/process/technology was at work. BG can be found at the MFMP channel on YT. Cheers.

[@reefsroost696]

Yes, well said.

[@craigf2696]

@corkygoss7403 I'll definitely see what he has to say. I have decades of experience in machine shops, and I have serious doubts about mechanical force milling being the methodology used.

[@craigf2696]

​@@corkygoss7403 Can you provide a specific video title regarding vase manufacturing? My ego is screaming! I've been saying from the git that it must be some kind of EDM.

[@lakukarikscha1417]

Egypt has some of the best kept remains, but you`ll find traces of them across the world. For example- the Trilithon Stones at Baalbek, Lebanon, the carvings of Jordan (Petra), Ethiopia (supposedly churches), the Ajanta Caves (supposedly Buddhist)and other structures in India. In Peru, the ruins of Pumapunku, Machu Pichu and Ollantaytambo, the compound of Sacsayhuamán and the city of Cusco, among many others. Teotihuacan in Mexico (also among many others), megalithic walls on Malta, the Easter Islands, in Japan, India, Italy, Russia, China. Angkor Wat in Cambodia, the Pyramids of Xi'an in China, the Underground cities of Turkey. Thousands of Dolmen around the World (this one i find particularly interesting) Then there are Ancient Excavation sites that rival those seen in modern times, in terms of scope and toolmarks, found from Asia to Africa. This list is by no means complete.

[@superdude4088]

Very, very, very good video. Thank you!

[@zielisawzielony9366]

Thx for the vid, very nice summary.

[@allanegleston4931]

am going to have to revisit vellocosvy with a non biasd altitude.

[@DouglasEttinger]

If Venus ever appeared as a comet, a coronal mass ejection CME would likely have hit the planet dead on. I am sure that Earth has had near misses with CMEs. I agree with others that your narration was excellent. Doug Ettinger

[@jimfoye1055]

Great job, as always.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

I have seen my dog do better jobs

[@evawilldrive]

Isn't it lovely, Venus's sacred geometrical path fertilizng/blessing us all with her energies. Thank you Stuart! I could understand it easily! Blessed new year!

[@evawilldrive]

The youtube's videos of last three days are suggesting bigger scale ascension. I saw this earlier kzbin.infobVjxGHF24r0?si=fAbU0WCtcpbtLwvd kind of reminiscent on an enlightened human soul light. And the Christ consciousness.

[@railwaymechanicalengineer4587]

Yes and that "Geometrical path" is also the result of Venus being a newly born "planet" (the result of Saturn having a huge CME), so clearly Venus being probably no more than 6,000-10,000 years old is still behaving as a Comet electrically. In an Electric Universe everything behaves electrically, as Nikola Tesla (another electrical scientist) knew full well !

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@railwaymechanicalengineer4587 literally none of that makes any sense

[@JJ33438]

I have often wondered if Venus entering the solar system caused the younger dryas cataclysm? as civilization tried to take hold again it was recorded that venus was an unstable star and there is some evidence that until it settled down in its current orbit it was unstable and made a number of close passes to the earth. I often wonder if it pulled mars atmosphere away destroying that small planet. there is enough evidence in ancient histories to think this might have been so. Thank you for another thoughtful video

[@pootthatbak2578]

Thats a regular 12000 year cycle. I think venus was always there. how could venus' orbit around the sun stabilize so quickly if it was pulled closer to the sun only 4000 years ago?

[@JJ33438]

@@pootthatbak2578 yes you bring up good points I didn't realize venus was almost same size as earth. but something pulled the atmosphere of mars and all its water off that planet and something almost wiped out earth 12,000 years ago (could be 13,000 yrs) and humanity had to hang on by its fingertips to survive and there were very few survivors. It also appears a very high tech civilization that was world wide got wiped out. also lands rose and fell the andes rose up higher and land around india sank. so something huge externally caused that catastrophe. Lots of scientists think it was venus joining the solar system. and I don't think venus orbit settled in 4K years I think it was more like 8K years. but you make some good points.

[@BillyLapTop]

@@pootthatbak2578 Interesting. If gravity is equivalent to the speed of light and all the planets with their moons, plus the asteroid belt, how do they maintain their positions relative to each others orbits with the lag period built into the speed of light? It begs the question of how stability is maintained.

[@jonnamechange6854]

​@@BillyLapTopI thought gravity is instantaneous?

[@BillyLapTop]

@@jonnamechange6854 Einstein set the speed of light and gravity as being same. I personally am skeptical despite LIGO's findings.

[@starobservers9862]

Goodjob Michael

[@onthatdirtroad]

Thank you Stuart.

[@TheyCallMeSir_H]

Much better than sitting in a classroom and memorizing 'facts".

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

single quotation marks or double ones - pick a lane

[@davejones7632]

You mean having to learn the actual science that shows EU to be complete nonsense?

[@robertsteele474]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x No capitalization or punctuation is the lane you picked, apparently.😱

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@robertsteele474 yup

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@physicswithpark3r-x3x wow, no value added to the conversation, huh? When I see your posts here, you seem like someone with so little going on for him in life. Is this the best you can do with your time? Badger people in the TP channel with ridiculous mainstream views? Go find dark matter and then come tell us where it was hiding 😂

[@kevinoboyle8939]

I’m not completely new to this but I’m not sure I fully understand the correlation between charge and mass. Is there more I can read on the subject?

[@rogerscottcathey]

4:06 chart doesn't make sense to me: ~"8 months to rotate around its axis" and then "58 days to rotate" ???

[@railwaymechanicalengineer4587]

Venus has a "retrograde rotation". Clear evidence it is a recently "born" Comet. And the product of Saturn having a major CME (Coronal Mass Ejection). Saturn was a small Brown Dwarf Star until it entered the Solar system. And these small Dwarf Stars have a nasty propensity to "Flare" (a type of CME) which is when they chuck out a part of their core. Hence both Saturn & Jupiter have very large collections of "Moons" most (including Venus) being the result of this electrical behaviour.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@railwaymechanicalengineer4587 retrograde rotation is not not evidence that it is a comet - otherwise Uranus would be comet, too!

[@Dracula-sn3so]

Also, the fact that it has absolutely no craters¥

[@railwaymechanicalengineer4587]

Of course but virtually ALL the Craters on all the Planets & Moons in the Solar system are clearly NOT the result of "Meteorite hits" as they all demonstrate clear electrical evidence. Once you understand what to look for electrically !

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@railwaymechanicalengineer4587 they demonstrate no such thing

[@choupi7316]

Do you know about Simon Shack's TYCHOS model ?

[@ArchonOne]

Great work, Stewart. You are the voice of thunderbolts. Venus is the rhino in the China shop of the standard model, one of many.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

no, it isn't

[@ArchonOne]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x When your model is unfalsifiable, it never is.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@ArchonOne that would be the eu model of Venus, yes?

[@TheGuildofIntrigue]

so saturn was a brown dwarf, earth was orbiting it. this system collided with the current solar sstem?

[@deepcosmiclove]

There was a global catastrophe The Flood.

[@reefsroost696]

Something like that. Earth, Mars & Venice in a polar configuration with Saturn.

[@quinto190]

Earth was orbiting at first inside the anode glow of Saturn (was probably red, not brown). When the Saturn system met the current sun, it stopped glowing and the polar configuration formed until everything was integrated.

[@lakukarikscha1417]

Yeah. But not so much collided, more electrically absorbed. The Sun became the new center and the planets aligned according to their charge exchange with the Sun. This charge exchange caused the former sun, Saturn, to essentially become a planet of Sol.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

no

[@iyasusholeman4115]

Can these Thunderbolts investigations, the theories of Immanuel Velifkosky, and the Tychos Geoaxial Binary Star system Theory be reconciled in a coherent solar system reality ???

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

no, they can't - but most folks here treat "consensus" as a dirty word, so it is just as well none of this eu stuff coheres

[@besticudcumupwith202]

How could Jupiter "give birth" to a entire planet? Where did that material come from, in a gas giant? Its core? What would cause a planet sized chunk to break off?

[@christianpnorris]

Mebbe not "break off" so much as bubble out?

[@cokemachine5510]

You're assuming they told you the truth. I personally think it was a discharge from Saturn. Have you ever welded?

[@elwynr1108]

An electric surge causes an instability resulting in the "gas giant" to expel matter to stabilise the charge. Gas giants are not just gas, out with the electrical influence of the Sun they would potentially be red/brown dwarfs

[@jerome2022]

Venus was the outside planet of. Jupiter and it was disturbed by passing dwarf star sending toward the sun. Crazy isn't it

[@corkygoss7403]

@@christianpnorris Nature loves bubbles and spheres. Good one.

[@Udrys999]

Is it possible that the Soviet probes measured not the actual temperature of Venus' atmosphere, but the probe's scorching fabric covering due to passing through thick atmospheric layers?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Venus Express made the measurements using its SPICAV/SOIR instrument (SPectroscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Venus/Solar Occultation in the InfraRed). This watches stars, or even the Sun, as they set behind Venus, a technique known as an occultation. The instrument measures the amount of light absorbed by the atmosphere at different wavelengths, and by doing so it identifies both the chemicals and the temperature in the different layers of the atmosphere.

[@ElectricUniverseEyes]

🤜🏼⚡️🤛🏻

[@giacomostefanoni7634]

Hello Stuart, great work as usual. I would like to get in touch for a EU-related project I'm working on, would it be possible? Through email, discord or whatever, I think I have some important contributions.

[@douglasstrother6584]

"Venus" ~ Shocking Blue

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

a Dutch band

[@patrickdonnelly5223]

In 1536, aka J 536. Not thousands of years ago. Rotation is slowing and will follow the norm in many years time

[@BillyLapTop]

Interesting. It would seem the changes to Venus's atmosphere, being closer to the sun, may act as a bellwether for changes in earth's atmosphere though subtler.. Just saying.

[@mburnzy9269]

Ok, how does Mercury's magnetic connection to the Sun differ than it's connection to Venus? There seems to be a large difference.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/14123/

[@davejones7632]

What 'magnetic connection' to the Sun? You mean the solar magnetic field that is dragged outwards by the solar wind plasma? That all planets reside within?

[@robertsteele474]

@@davejones7632 Sure. In what ways does it differ?

[@remr15]

Good analysis but the bottom line is you don’t actually know

[@reefsroost696]

Of course we can't ever know but this is interesting. And, all in all makes more sense than the standard model.

[@robertdiggins7578]

Science is the best method for learning and doesn't include a step called Consensus. Have you ever "known" something, only to find out it was incorrect?

[@davejones7632]

@@reefsroost696 _"And, all in all makes more sense than the standard model."_ Lol! You mean scientifically impossible, physics-violating nonsense, made up by a scientifically illiterate mythologist makes sense to you? Well, not to anyone who has even a basic understanding of physics. Which is why this nonsense only exists on youtube. Just like flat earth, which it is on a par with.

[@ageofanomaly3874]

How do we know venus distance and size ?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

google it

[@davejones7632]

We've been there. And we didn't need to to figure out such basic information.

[@ageofanomaly3874]

@ oh. “We” have ? I guess no one told me. What evidence do we have for the trip ? Any pictures ? Who went ? Were they trust worthy? Hope you dont say nasa… those fuckers lie all the time… like all the time. lol. Did you know they started by hiring nazi’s…. Not exactly trust worthy people. lol

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@ageofanomaly3874 Venera even landed on the surface and took pictures.

[@ageofanomaly3874]

@ cool.. im having trouble even finding a single video of Russian rocket leaving earth… all i can find is chopped up short clips… not one single feed of a camera strapped to the side of a rocket showing raw footage proving the rocket stays up there and doesn’t fall back down… any chance you know of any raw footage of rocket videos. Where they dont use Hollywood tricks like cuts and edits and what not.. im looking for the raw footage.. 15-30 mins long. Of rocket leaving earth.. going up and not coming back down… single camera view. Or the raw footage from different angles but continuous feed of each camera. 15-30. Mins long. The raw footage for evidence purposes. How many times man shoot a rocket up ? Can we find one video not cut up and edited? Raw footage one camera ? Seems SUS IF THAT DOESNT EXIST ? DOESNT IT ?

[@stefanpalczewski]

I would not be surprised if Venus became our new home in about 2K. I'll be back then.😀

[@JesperAndersson-v3n]

Veneric to say the least

[@RkicF8]

Earths sister planet has always been Titan. Sol original planets were Mercury and the moon. Sol spectral frequency shows it belongs to the Sagittarius Dwarf A galaxy. Walt Thornhill was correct that the gaseous planets were dwarf stars and Venus was a recent CME release from Sol as it captured the Saturn system and ripped apart our original system. Venus had a tail, like it has 2 south poles, it is still cooling off. Venus from the sun is similar to Quasars.

[@dantheman9135]

Crush on Electric Universe and Thunderbolts

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

quack quack quack

[@misterbojangles6205]

The morning and evening star. Counter orbit.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

this may help: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrograde_and_prograde_motion

[@jamespratt7574]

Thank you 👍 that is NEWS

[@raddison3187]

Weld. I have been commanding that MaRs is not the planet for humans to settlement and/or teRRa foRm. The stat is that Venus may be betteR for humans i.e. somehow! WheRe might a happy medium context be found?

[@patrickdonnelly5223]

Venus lost its moon, which we now call Mercury/Odin. The rotational energy was converted into heat as the planet stopped rotating. This was caused by the discharges with Earth.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Who calls Mercury Odin? Also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking for a general idea and A&A 413, 381-393 (2004) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031446 Theory of the Mercury’s spin-orbit motion and analysis of its main librations N. Rambaux and E. Bois for technical details.

[@t00by00zer]

Venus, being aligned with Jupiter, Mercury and the sun, shares a genesis with those bodies, while Earth, Mars, Saturn and Neptune are from elsewhere. Venus was ripped from Jupiter upon Saturn's arrival at the Sol system.

[@nadahere]

What happened to...Uranus? =]]

[@robertsteele474]

@@nadahere Don't get personal.😉

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

none of that is true

[@davejones7632]

But not according to anyone sane or educated.

[@raycar1165]

So how do you two, priests of scientism, explain the different axial tilts? You obviously think you know more than anyone here, enlighten us. Or is condemnation without justification your only skill?

[@aerily1]

❤❤

[@deisecanella4640]

❤🎉

[@kevin-e5h5t]

When it comes to Venus, I would be mining it's atmosphere. I would get 1,000 years of value, and still have a 10,000 years of providence, until it was habitable. Then I would have the value of a new Earth. Before I could do that, I would have to mine 10,000 near-Earth asteroids.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

what would you be mining for? spurious apostrophes?

[@robertsteele474]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Kevin was apparently successful mining superfluous commas. You should investigate his technique since your success in finding initial capital letters is lacking.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@robertsteele474 you have found your theme and you're running with it. shame you have no innate sense of humour, though - you never seem to realise when your jokes fall flat

[@andrewlutes2048]

Consensus is agreement, not proof of anything.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

true enough - but when there is a consensus of really smart people, it is worth paying attention to

[@ThomasSmith-os4zc]

You can see the catastrophe of this happening in the stratigraphy of North America. There is no continuity in the stratigraphy of North America.

[@deepcosmiclove]

The Flood.

[@tinymetaltrees]

This is vey inconvenient. Can't you just go along with the concensus so we can declare victory? All this "we don't know everything" stuff is making us look bad. Also, the sky is falling! Buy a wind powered car!

[@gamebent]

Declare victory of what?

[@robertdiggins7578]

​@@gamebentThe Science ©️

[@Vetfather]

👍💯

[@mikelaffoon5986]

😊

[@EnergyTRE]

😂😂 if size and distance where actually similar we would have two moons not one 😂😂

[@TheFox2450]

Well done Stuart. Perhaps, one day far in the future the same scenario will happen, & Man will come back with no knowledge of a god, ( although I don't think he can help himself.)

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

unlikely...

[@hawklord100]

Making use of solid observations with known science and providing logical explantions and not inventing fairys is the EU way.

[@davejones7632]

The whole thing is based on fairy tales! It certainly has nothing to do with science. EU and flat earth are on the same level.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

"logical explantions" - is that when you leave the plants out in the rain?

[@davejones7632]

_"with known science"_ No science to see here.

[@hawklord100]

@@davejones7632 it always amases me why trolls feel the need to seek out something they don't understand and voice there bewildement in nasty tones 🤣🤣

[@hawklord100]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Electric rain mate... do catch up 🤣🤣

[@thenextpoetician6328]

"Scientists" :)

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

what about them?

[@michaelatwaoi7876]

WHY would any sane human ever want to go out into SPACE when this shows that ''space'' is a frigging WELDING EXPERIMENT..?!

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

because, well, let's see... this video is nonsense? could that be it?

[@michaelatwaoi7876]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x amazingly my exact thoughts were that all those news articles flashing by incessantly demonstrate that the idea of such a NON-ELECTRIC [of which Newton was thoroughly ignorant] idea of gently accumulating dustballs into planets space science is too shaky as a **known** anything and is instead a corrupt THEORY CONSTANTLY having to REVISE ITSELF with EVER MORE INSANE ideas like invisible BLACK HOLES and best yet DARK MATTER and DARK ENERGY ... Don't you agree? ttyl

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@michaelatwaoi7876 it's a conundrum all right

[@quays99]

Birkeland current created venus where it is. Concentric current circles alocate heavy elements to the inner planets and less dense elements to outer gas giants.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

no

[@davejones7632]

Lol! Nope. Birkeland currents only exist in planetary magnetospheres. And Venus doesn't have an intrinsic magnetic field, so it can't even have them.

[@vraielumiere]

Suss0's!! Eyes Open No fear be safe everyone

[@raymondrhudy8681]

I'm always hitting Anton and, John for a little credit! So far, no answer.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Have you tried Luke or Matthew or Mark?

[@ivornelsson2238]

Velikovsky´s proposition of “Venus entering the Solar System as a cometary body, appearing as a terrifying Specter in the Sky to our prehistoric ancestors” is a huge misconception of the Roman Pantheon, Goddess Venus. Velikovsky also predicted space probes would “find a hellish landscape on Venus - with extraordinarily hot, nearly incandescent surface temperatures. Goddess Venus was/is a Mother Goddess of fertility and prosperity, which obviously don´t fit on any accounts to the “hellish conditions” of the planetary Venus at all. This more than indicate Mother Goddess Venus to belong otherwhere but to planets, most likely belonging to the Milky Way Mythology. A connection which the Venus goddess also shared by the Egyptian Goddess Hathor, and the Greek Goddess Aphrodite and other cultural mother goddesses. Still, Goddess Venus is inconsistently interpreted to participate in the TBP-series, “Symbols of an alien Sky” and its “alien planetary configuration" on a line over the northern celestial Earth axis. It´s all a huge mythical misconception of the ancient Roman Pantheon deities belonging to the Milky Way Mythology of Creation.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Birkeland explored several ways to hook up the circuitry of the electric sun: "In the first place, it might be imagined that the interior of the sun formed the positive pole for enormous electric currents, while perhaps the faculae, in particular, round the spots, formed the negative poles. _Alternatively_ it might be imagined that the positive poles for the discharges were to be found outside the photosphere, for instance in the sun's corona, the primary cause of the discharge being the driving away of negative ions from the outermost layers of the sun's atmosphere in some way or other for instance, as ARRHENIUS has assumed, by light-pressure after condensation of matter round them." Finally, it might be assumed and this, according to the experimental analogies, seems the most probable assumption that the sun, in relation to space, has an enormous negative electric tension of about 600 million volts." All these various models keep the cathode at or on the solar photosphere, perhaps at sunspots. The anode is proposed at three possible locations: inside the sun, just above the photosphere in the corona, and further out in interplanetary space. As these configurations all have a common cathode, it might also be possible to consider combinations of the anode positions. Each one of these configurations would require a different analysis as the each has different implications for where and how we can make measurements. And each and every one of them is roundly refuted by the data! To his credit, Birkeland recognized the model had serious problems that would require more than Maxwell's equations to resolve: "According to our manner of looking at the matter, every star in the universe would be the seat and field of activity of electric forces of a strength that no one could imagine. We have no certain opinion as to how the assumed enormous electric currents with enormous tension are produced, but it is certainly not in accordance with the principles we employ in technics on the earth at the present time. One may well believe, however, that a knowledge in the future of electrotechnics of the heavens would be of great practical value to our electrical engineers." Each one of these models above have the same problem: How is the electric potential maintained - and mere back of the envelope calculations readily show that any plausible mechanism falls short by at least 10 orders of magnitude, or else, if somehow magicked into being, would rip the sun apart.

[@DerTypausBielefeld]

We might argue about the subject how the electromagnetic force does all this. Whether the plasma cosmology is right, but didn't find all thes evidences required due to a lack of scientifical investigation about that subject. We could not argue about the subject if the electromagnetic force was responsible for everything. There are so many reasons why. One reason is that gravity is irrelevant, it's like the whips of a mosquito against a jumbo jet.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

The “Electric Sun” model featured in the “Electric Universe” was concocted by Ralph Juergens, then Velikovsky’s right-hand theoretician, in 1967 in a paper rejected by Nature, that was intended to “reconcile celestial mechanics and Velikovskian catastrophism”, a fact Scott chose to suppress in his 2007 book “The Electric Sky.” The paper was printed in the British Velikovsky journal in the 1970s.

[@ddally8851]

Stuart, are you any kin to David Talbott? you are the narrator whose voice does not match his physical appearance. Can you provide a more recent photograph of yourself or actually appear on camera like a regular human being?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

he is the son

[@OhhhhhhhBugger]

Mars cannot come between Earth and Venus. Mars' orbit is outside earth's, and would never cross orbits. Mars can "appear to" conjunct Venus though, and even skip the solar synodical cycle to do so because it can be as far as 48 degrees away from the sun in the sky.

[@therealpils]

It would greatly help the science of Thunderbolts if they could learn to spell properly: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmLQe4RriJeBqqM

[@robertsteele474]

Proper English sentences start with capitalization.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@robertsteele474 not on the internet

[@therealpils]

@@robertsteele474 🤣Edited. unlike the video.

[@therealpils]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x 🤣

[@robertsteele474]

@@therealpils 😉

[@sudd3660]

this chanel has to stop using "ai" generated art, it cheapest the look and statement of the ideas. make a stand against the ai now please. sustainability is at stake and the social impact is wholly negative also.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

I think the crumbiness of AI imagery matches that of the thinking on offer

[@robertsteele474]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Make sure you correct your voice-to-text AI before you post as that sentence makes no sense.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@robertsteele474 perhaps read more slowly? reading comprehension is a struggle for lots of adults, it's nothing to be ashamed of

[@janmartinart6618]

You repeat yourself

[@Luminious789]

Wal Thornhill is no longer with us?

[@fishn2death]

I feel like this is like finding missing jigsaw pieces Love it

[@fishn2death]

Cool

[@doctorofart]

Brilliant. Huge eu fan This video caused an epiphany regarding the Saturn Sky. My first thought was it would have to be a long term effect in the sky to be so well documented. Then I thought how does a planet always point its face at us, like the moon, and it struck. I knew it had to be a 6 pointed star and I knew why. The pole of Saturn is an impact crater with a solid metallic planet core lodged into the crater, weighing and effecting the affection to another planet. Like the moon is affected with the earth. It is a magnetic attraction (affection) to our core, which keeps the moon facing us. I’m guessing the crater is on the far side and the bullet lodged deep into the moons plastic core on the side facing us. The heat signature of the moon is strong evidence for this. Therefore the 6 sided pole at one time was earth locked, magnetically. And the reason for the star being six sided is because a hexagram is an impact fracture zone signature. Cracking the deep crust in a perfect hex and immediately becoming filled with molten material. The entire six side pool was on fire and facing earth. 🌍

[@Amandalynn6350]

❤❤