When you have a name like Sultan Khan, you don't need no stinkin' titles
@antoniovaccaro216011 ай бұрын
You may think so, but I think Sultan Khan was a servanr, if not slave, of some feudal master in Colonial India without any agency for himself.
@tigerdalandan11 ай бұрын
@@antoniovaccaro2160 Aw man. :c
@Calicoo-x4d11 ай бұрын
Sultan actually means a “king” in Arabic
@Priestbokmei13 ай бұрын
Yeah, you’ve got a point! His name is a power name. Both names mean ruler.
@abibabisonic60122 ай бұрын
@@Priestbokmei1 one Arabic and one Mongolian
@gxtmfa11 ай бұрын
Thanks for covering Sultan Khan! He’s got to be one of chess’s biggest “what ifs”
@McLKeith11 ай бұрын
I am not sure what the tradition for awarding posthumous titles, but I think Sultan Khan deserves one.
@rainingglass555411 ай бұрын
Sultan means king and Khan is the elder (another name for a leader type position) So he's already named king of kings 😊
@MySquash16 ай бұрын
You are the best commentator, with great comments and personality, No big ego trip. Thanks.
@heeroyuy29811 ай бұрын
Fantastic choice for a video! Sultan Khan is such a fascinating figure. And yeah he should be awarded a grandmaster title. At least if Morphy should, he should too.
@davidjames14911 ай бұрын
never heard of Sultan Khan before this but he definitely seems to have had great intuition and understanding of the game. GM worthy for sure considering the era he played in
@fethikhalfallah865811 ай бұрын
You should see his game against Capablanca.
@davidjames14911 ай бұрын
@@fethikhalfallah8658 thanks i'll check it out
@prabirbhowmick878811 ай бұрын
There are a few games on KZbin against legends like Marshall, capablanka. You will feel proud to watch what is called chess defence.
@LawrencRJUTube11 ай бұрын
Hi, for a while I was supporting Agedmater's Chess Channel but I had to stop for a while due budget problems, I believe all of the folks who prepare for their commentaries more than earn their money for the time they must spend -- not just in the analysis but for creating the video. I am a weak player but I LOVE the game of Chess. I would like to support them all. I just recently come across your channel for the first time in your commentary on the 1918 game between Capablanca and Marshall, and I like your style better than the others and I was surprised that Chessdawg was NOT listed among "The 10 best Chess Channels". It should be. When I get back to where I am able to support a chess channel I plan to support your channel. Keep up the good work. I really like the style of your commentaries and especially your choice of games. You really move along and I am sure a stronger player than myself could keep up with you, but as with the other channels I have to pause and do replays to fully appreciate your presentation. One thing you could do to improve is have some way of signaling that the speculative lines of play and pause before the actual move that was played. To make it possible for me to skip ahead initially skipping over the alternatives to see the actaul moves without the sidelines. And then go back afterwards and check out the sidelines. Maybe a red boarder or a green boarder around the board could signal main line and "excursions". I have been thinkign a lot about what you call "machine" moves that an engine has determined is the "best" move. However, it would seem to me that what is the "best move" might only be best if the machine were playing against another machine. I can imagine that in many cases the "best" move is often the "best" only if the opponent is able to explore the alternatives X moves ahead, where X is the largest "look head" than a human can muster in the time available. Also what is the best move in a regular game might NOT be the best move in a Blitz game where the opponent has to move based on position rather than on "look ahead" levels. For example, if a "smart" chess engine is playing a "dumb" chess engine that is moving almost at random following some very simplistic strategy and never making sacrifices and playing to draw rather than to win, it could checkmate in fewer moves by choosing moves that were NOT the "best " moves for a situation where if was playing with a grand master or another chess engine. I think of the best move (from the point of view of a machine) is one that will absolutely guarantee a win or a draw no matter what the opponents next move happens to be even if it is a very unlikely move where the opponent makes a master move out of dumb luck rather than skill. And I imagine there is often more than one move that will guarantee this outcome, but one will likely lead to a mate more quickly than the other. A weak player might make the best move but for the wrong reason. And someone might accuse him of cheating somehow because he made a "non-human" move. Like a person might hang his queen in inadvertently but it turned out to be a powerful queen sacrifice. I once made a blunder when playing someone much stronger than me. I hung my queen and when I discovered it, I wondered why my superior opponent took almost five minutes to move and then did NOT take my Queen, I am sure he saw my queen was hung if I saw it, and at first I though he was just being nice -- but is like there is "No crying in baseball" there is no "being nice" in Chess. When the game was over and he won, he set the board up the way it had been after my fortuitous blunder and showed me the danger he was in by taking my queen. He would have been perfectly safe to take my queen, because I was not a strong enough player to take advantage of danger I put him in. But he believed in playing the board NOT the person, and there was a chance I could make the right moves out of dumb luck and win. Also, It was too early in the game for him to ascertain my weakness.
@Insignia-bv6gj2 ай бұрын
who reads this sht
@Grandcapi7 ай бұрын
One of the most underrated chess channels around. Your videos are awesome! Classic chess at its best!
@Necrozene5 ай бұрын
I rate him. Little old me.
@christianfthomsen11 ай бұрын
Surely he should be awarded a posthumous GM title! Nice game!👍🏻😄
@kingscrusher10 ай бұрын
Very good video - nice commentary. FIDE has now awarded him the Grandmaster title. Cheers, K
@chessdawg10 ай бұрын
Thank you for the update, Kingscrusher! Enjoy your videos.
@Jm6579611 ай бұрын
The Paul Morphy of Asia
@SatvikChowdharyАй бұрын
Better
@IAmTheRealHim11 күн бұрын
@@SatvikChowdharyyou wish
@MuhammadKhan-nj8qq6 ай бұрын
Thank you for covering Mir Sultan Khan's games with giving him so much respect that he truly deserves.
@tomast1323Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@nazlone11 ай бұрын
Fully agree for GM title for Sultan Khan and please add Najmatdinov of the former USSR.
@ikmalaxl52862 ай бұрын
No, super gm pls
@rickdynes11 ай бұрын
Your allegiance to IDEAS AND CONCEPTS AND EVALUATION serve you WELL This Channel has ALWAYS been VALUABLE and NOW THIS PARTICULAR Video has pushed YOUR VALUE to an HISTORIC LEVEL it doesn't take very long for a Great Thinker to RECOGNIZE a Great Thinker!! please keep putting out Critical/GREAT Content. HISTORY WILL SMILE on Your DEEPLY INSIGHTFUL Efforts 😊
@MrSupernova1115 ай бұрын
Sick tactic at the end! Thanks for the game review!
@ManoleitorArg11 ай бұрын
Love your videos, i start playing again after 25 years, i have almost none knowledge about the game but still find the videos really entreteined and video after video i'm starting to understand the game ina deeper way (thanks to you i learned the Indian King opening!) Thanks for everything ! See you in the next video, much love from Argentina ♥️
@Willtolov11 ай бұрын
I totally agree with your idea of awarding Mr. Khan the award,m no doubt.
@mish8942 ай бұрын
The way he force his opponents to move their pawns and weakening their position is so Amazing , in advanced keeps his center Rock solid !! , He made an Octopus Knight , before Kasparov , without learning basic openings ! Pure Gifted Genius
@TheThinkersBible11 ай бұрын
Probably the best chess video I've ever seen. Strong YES on GM for Sultan Khan.
@euclideszoto99711 ай бұрын
I always believed he was a GM! He won the British Championship. He beat Capablanca.
@gerrymanuel764011 ай бұрын
He also beat Alekhine, in another occasion
@RusselKabirTR4 ай бұрын
He is now.
@PichipieifyКүн бұрын
@@RusselKabirTRreally?
@shawnmaguire23425 ай бұрын
Without a doubt John...GM through and through. What a fun match to watch thank you for bringing this to us
@maribozu11 ай бұрын
Hi John, thank you very much for your content and videos, I enjoy them a lot! Soultanbeieff is a Dutch transcription of a Russian last name with Turkish/Arabic/Turkic roots. A more accurate spelling and pronunciation, from a modern Russian perspective, would be Sultanbeyev or Sultanbeiev, where: 'Sultan' (in Arabic) means 'lord/master', 'bey' is a Turkic term used to address a gentleman or sir, 'ev' - a suffix of a possessive adjective, surnames with these suffixes are derived from patronymics, overall implying one of the grandparents of this family was a highly titled Muslim citizen. I, however, have no idea how his last name was correctly pronounced back in the 1920s in Belgium, and it could be that the change in spelling/pronunciation was intentional.
@chessdawg11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the information!
@andress478011 ай бұрын
what an absolute genius def grandmaster level
@Necrozene5 ай бұрын
I absolutely love his games. Gives me delightful shivers. Master of the King.
@gscott96655 ай бұрын
Definitely should have the GM title.....no doubt. Tyvm for reminding this old fellow of this tremendous talent.
@ganeshpillai754511 ай бұрын
Sultan Khan . The name itself speaks. His name is not less than a GM title. His name is sufficient. He was a gem.
@SwaniZubayeer227 ай бұрын
Thank you ChessDawg för this beautiful game. I think Sultan deserves a GM title.
@rogermartin843511 ай бұрын
Nice analysis. I have a booklet of his games. They are pearls to understand the patterns and underlying principles. Sits alongside Nimzo's My sysem and Capa's Fundamentals. Yes he should be a GM.
@joseperez877411 ай бұрын
To learn and show up and beat world champions was super impressive amazing... A force of nature... Like a lightning desapearance.. YES a GM for sure
@Mick041578 ай бұрын
yes ,i agree with you ,him and rashid najimidinov
@drmumtazalikhan11 ай бұрын
A player who beats some of the greatest players ever like capablanca, Marshall is a genius... Gm or not... He will continue to amaze generations to come...
@stevemalbasa330111 ай бұрын
Hey, just wanted to say I really enjoy your channel and your analysis! Keep at it, and one day you can make Agadmator make room at the top for the best chess channels on the KZbin
@DJ-Art-MorrisАй бұрын
It would be sick if they were to actually award him the title posthumously. If ever there was a person worthy of that, it was definitely him.
@Shazali-ke4sd11 ай бұрын
Just heard only his name before... Very obscure...
@farzein400211 ай бұрын
6- There is a BBC documentary about Sultan Khan. Interviews of his friends, his son and of Fatima, present in that documentary.
@csca55511 ай бұрын
Crazy talent, why did he stop playing?
@venkateshas138110 ай бұрын
Yes, I agree with your idea of giving GM title to Sultan Khan.
@familyprasad107911 ай бұрын
Top player! PM GM title is Deserving for sure. Will be interesting to know his rating..
@ravikiranmusic2 ай бұрын
FIDE has now posthumously awarded him the GM title, deservingly…
@davidc519111 ай бұрын
He should get an honorary GM title, as should Vera Menchik who beat, among others, Sultan Khan and Max Euwe.
@kiyarashreza365411 ай бұрын
Alireza did not live up to expectations last year, but it seems like he has been back in good form in the past couple of months. Keep an eye on Tata Steel and cherry-pick and cover some of his games as he plays in the tournament, and of course, in the upcoming Candidates. Thank you
@SoimulPatriei10 ай бұрын
Sultan Khan plays a perfectly strategical game.
@jaafars.mahdawi691111 ай бұрын
How much is natural talent highlighted and enough appreciated in any field or endeavour, i wonder and wonder and wonder...
@denisrho101911 ай бұрын
Indeed, I enjoyed it \
@ManuelAlfredo-np7ou11 ай бұрын
Of course he should.🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
@IjazAhmad-2 ай бұрын
He has already received the title.
@Mikheno29 күн бұрын
Anyone who has beaten Capablanca even once should be awarded GM.
@krishrao277811 ай бұрын
I wonder what Petrosian would have said about this style.
@Edmonddantes12311 ай бұрын
Incredible talent!!!
@BramAlkema-e2j26 күн бұрын
Султанбаев = Sultanbaev frenchified to Soultanbeieff sultanbeef.
@TruthSurge11 ай бұрын
If he meets ALL of the qualifications of a GM, then why not? If not, then no. I mean, GM didn't exist before 1950 my net search said so people before then probably should just be referred to with adjectives. Great. Masterful. Genius. whatever like that. Shouldn't be about doing something nice for someone after death. Should be about whether they meet the qualifications, I'd say.
@wjobrazenjeniebianjski2236 ай бұрын
Hey, do you think that you can make a profile playlist of Paul Charles Morphy games that he WON; the greatest by a long way.
@rankit2010 ай бұрын
Please, more of tals😢
@whaddoiknow65192 ай бұрын
Even the top players of the day couldn't really make a living from chess, so it wasn't really a profession. Mir Khan was miserable in England -- the weather was awful, the food was worse, he couldn't speak English, and he didn't have the company of his friends and peers. The reasons for leaving were much more compelling than the reasons for staying in England. Plus he was a servant in the household of some Nawab, so when the Nawab left, the chance to go where he would continue to have a job was not to be passed up.
@VivaRafaafaRaviV11 ай бұрын
Hello, about the ending position, is queen d1 losing too for white ?
@chessdawg11 ай бұрын
I am not sure if you mean e1 after black plays Rf3. He can't move to d1 after that. If e1 then Rc3 still wins for black. If the knight takes the rook then Nf3 forks the king and queen. If the queen takes then Ne2 as in the variation I showed. If you mean Qd1 after black takes the rook, that would just leave black up a whole piece with a dominant position. Hopefully, that answers the question.
@VivaRafaafaRaviV11 ай бұрын
Yes black would be up material thank you
@rannieperalta21922 ай бұрын
The guy deserve GM title! imagine outplaying Raul Capablanca who is a world champion! He has estimated 2560 elo rating
@chessmate736811 ай бұрын
GM Sultan Khan sounds alright, when you know how little he was given theoretically in term of chess and how much he gave in return. Imagine him being trained like Magnus Carlsen and others that receive formal chess-educations from their infancy onwards. He did all that being almost a slave. That is quite impressive!
@florencioosoteo17162 ай бұрын
Is the opening Karo Khan named after him?
@midnighttrain-jz2my11 ай бұрын
GM !
@familyprasad107911 ай бұрын
Please commentate on Casablanca versus Sultan Khan.
@franktaggart-qs5ff11 ай бұрын
He was a head of every one and not read? Well done that’s a hurdle yes GM
@zainquadri120611 ай бұрын
There are hundreds if not thousands of Grand Masters who have vanished into the annals oblivion... The only reason Sultan Khan and Rashid Gibyatovich Nezhmetdinov get so much coverage is solely because they played like modern day machines WITHOUT getting the elusive GM title... I think their memory is best served by simply showing their games without bias of trying to have the GM title awarded to these two greats of the game posthumously... Let it just remain...
@elvinyeo723011 ай бұрын
Sultan Khan's pawn moves are almost like AI.
@Thatoneguy-124 ай бұрын
11:14 can’t queen just go to d1?
@LawrencRJUTube11 ай бұрын
You said "B6 on Khan's second move when it was actually B7" just a slight flaw.
@LawrencRJUTube11 ай бұрын
My Error ... I was confused by your suggestion of the potential Bishop move. My error!! :-(
@hjam86123 ай бұрын
great game
@bestosensei11 ай бұрын
How did he learn to play?
@Priestbokmei13 ай бұрын
Yes, he definitely should be given the GM title.
@muhammadshabbir499411 ай бұрын
Pakistan Chess genius.mir sultan khan Great complement sir❤
@trulyfacts285710 ай бұрын
Indian chess genius,no pakistan at that time,lol,your ancestors also indian.
@HollyMartins11 ай бұрын
A well played game
@LawrencRJUTube11 ай бұрын
Your showing the world his game was better than the posthumous title!
@fethikhalfallah865811 ай бұрын
Salt and beef, wish I had such a beautiful name.
@yonahngambi2911 ай бұрын
Yup he deserves to be a GM
@farzein400211 ай бұрын
7- He didn't like the climate of Britain and also he didn't have money to challenge the title match ( at that time, you needed money to challenge).
@alcaylan252311 ай бұрын
This are for the underdogs! Titles are only titles! A non rated chess player who beats Grandmasters is worthy of a movie! A movie that will somewhat immortalize his name and to the world!
@chad0x11 ай бұрын
at 4:17, why not play Nb4? hit the queen, take away a defender of e4.
@chessdawg11 ай бұрын
White can play Qb1, then kick the knight with a3. Also, that knight really wants to land on d4. That is a permanent weak square since no pawn can eject a piece from it.
@hugovaz77711 ай бұрын
Im assuming he created the caro khan opening?
@christianfthomsen11 ай бұрын
😂
@ishaanvkumar157611 ай бұрын
The opening is called caro kann, and no he did not create it
@Eleuthero511 ай бұрын
I think Khan's opponent's name is pronounced sool-tahn-BAY-eff.
@DaniyalKhan-o1n25 күн бұрын
He played this game on 93% accuracy following stockfish 14
@manuelgarrido560211 ай бұрын
He got a win over Capablanca and not a insignificant one!
@robertdavis43868 ай бұрын
The man should absolutely be awarded the title. He suffers the same " disrespect Shoeless Joe " Jackson got because of the 1919 World series scandal. Jackson batted over 400 for the series and yet somehow helped lose the championship. Yeah right!!
@robertleo74863 ай бұрын
Another great player from the past that if given time in the modern computer age he would dominate the chess world sending Magnus to the golf course 😎
@ArrosticiniVore11 ай бұрын
Vote in favor of a GM title? Yes
@tommynilsson202211 ай бұрын
Yes he definetly should.
@Amer1kop7 ай бұрын
Chess DAWWWWWWGGG
@Rizzycat111 ай бұрын
Yes, give him the GM title
@7x263-h7r11 ай бұрын
Khan for GM!!!
@farzein400211 ай бұрын
1- Sultan Khan defeated Capa and that's in end game.
@LawrencRJUTube11 ай бұрын
Please excuse me for all my comments, sir, but I have gone through this game four times trying to get a better appreciation of your comments. I notice that some of the actual moves (as opposed to potential moves) you have indicated with YELLOW arrows. But you have not been consistent with this convention and had you been consistent with always shewing actual moves with a yellow arrow, it would have been easier to follow your commentary on the game. Again, whenever you show the board as it actually was played, by utilizing some convention (like a yellow boarder) where a person could follow the game with the sound muted and fast forward past the points where the board is not "real" -- to get a "birds eye view" of the actual game, would be VERY helpful for weaker players like myself who cannot listen as fast as you can talk and so sometimes "can't see the forest for the trees".
@Nic-q4e11 ай бұрын
Give him the title.
@farzein400211 ай бұрын
5- Fatima won British women chess championship in first try. She also played with Queen.
@Alan-megan11 ай бұрын
For someone who is not well educated n read. Definitely deserves all Respect. And without formal training and the luxury of a white man. He was indeed a natural in Chess. Just like those that are a natural in drawing or music…
@bring-out11 ай бұрын
@RaniaIsAwesome The "white privilege" narrative is rampant these days.
@trulyfacts285710 ай бұрын
Pakistan was not yet that time.
@narasidinivahi11 ай бұрын
1929 to 1933 means Sutan Khan was from India
@1satyaghosal11 ай бұрын
Sultan Khan was a genius. And here the debate is about Pakistan, India, British colonial blah blah... how stupid can we get
@Anti-Chess11 ай бұрын
Wonderful comment. People prefer to troll than to think and respond objectively.
@paulbloemen725611 ай бұрын
I’m not sure I like the word “natural” when it comes to games like chess. In recent comments I often hear it, only to hear too that a move is tempting because it looks natural, but is not good because of so-and-so. I think the really useful adjective is “good”. I guess Sultan Khan was quite a good player, but I don’t see a point to award a really old fashioned and for top level rather meaningless title like “grandmaster” posthumously. As for this nice and well played game here, I have to assume that his unknown opponent really wasn’t that strong: we are talking top level, isn’t it?
@vitojohn8168Ай бұрын
This guy level are another league .he should play with alphazero not human.
@farzein400211 ай бұрын
2- He won two back to back British championships and then he returned back to India ( now Pakistan).