Summary Trial- Practice & Procedure: Justice V Ramkumar

[@legaleagle8078]

It is always a pleasure to hear his lordship Justice Ramkumar.

[@68.sreeharisunil77]

Justice v ramkumar sir ❤❤❤

[@sathyanarayanapola607]

We respect Ramkumar honoured judge sir imparting knowledge ours thanks very much sir

[@BeyondLawCLC]

So true, he helps everyone with his knowledge sharing

[@legaleagle8078]

We also acknowledge the great work of imparting knowledge by this channel.

[@praveens4946]

❤️❤️❤️👏👏👏👏🎉🎉🎉

[@Lawkannan1983]

nice man and gift to all academicians

[@sachinyadav5637]

Sir thank you very much from bottom of my heart for explaining in such a crisp and to point manner.

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thanks and keep watching more videos

[@riyansodhi2791]

As usual great lecture .

[@m.r.anuradharamaprasad5720]

Very nice information about summary trials. Thank you for the topic. The Judicial officer had explained us well. Thank you again sir. Namaste.

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Glad you liked it

[@RAHULALOORKAR]

Excellent

[@praveens4946]

🙏🙏🙏❤❤🎉🎉🎉

[@sayasargam]

If summary trial is equivalent to summon case trial, where is need to have summary trial because, as soon framing of notice is done in ni case, if defence sounds probable, change it to immediately to summon case. Not sound legal as a rule because, why the accused can be given acquital. Eg. In MV case, produce licence or show, within speed limit notification but the accused still to face rigor of trial despite the prosecution case demolished at outset, even in ni case, sometimes payment shown, contract illegal, still accused instead of accused asked to face case. In effect, either plead guilty or hold guilty, face summon case instead of ending case at outser.

[@ajayanvn8243]

GOOD EVENING RESPECTED SIR,AJAYAN VN

[@sayasargam]

In ni case reference, if everything of summon case to be followed, as there is no such procedure, what is the point in having a summon trial, as under summary trial, everything can be done on same day, especially useful in case of apparant evidence or law. The court simply say, the world may says, discretion, thus, I will treat as summon case trial

[@sayasargam]

Section 253 quagmire, eg. Is issuance of special summons essential precondition, because the accused may ask his advocate to appear and compound or plead guilty, however, we see the insistence for accused to appear and sign the register. Is it proper or not

[@sayasargam]

Never understood the concept, even in ni act, why despite being called summary trial, it does not lead to acquital, ni case laws says, it should be convertrd to summon case, if defence seen probable. It is important, once we call it trial, it should have both fate. Even in small challan matters, motor vehicle, we see admonishment but never acquital unless one is put to proper summon, warrant trial. If we accept the case acquital in summary trial, then absence of concept of discharge is also immaterial as anyhow, if trial judge believes evidence, it can be acquital then going for 482 crpc, and why defence not to be seen