Supreme Courts 8-1 Decision Changes California's Mag Ban Case, Duncan v. Bonta

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had been waiting on the SCOTUS decision before deciding California's "Mag Ban" case Duncan v. Bonta. After the decision came down both parties, "appellants" and "appellee's" submitted briefs to the court. The plaintiffs briefs completely overturned certain arguments the 9th had brought up.
Don't wait. Get Your Gold and Silver now- American Hartford Gold To Learn more Visit offers.americanhartfordgold.c...
Social Media
INSTAGRAM - / thedailyshooter76
X - / thedailyshooter
Check out my Merch, Shirts, Mugs and More!
teespring.com/dashboard/stores
NOTICE: I am "NOT" a lawyer, and this should not be considered legal advice. These are my opinions.
(DISCLAIMER: This post may contain paid advertisements or affiliate links. What is an affiliate link? It means that if you click on one of the product links, Copper Jacket TV will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support the channel and allows awesome future content. Thank you for the support!
DO NOT try anything you see in this video at home. All work should be performed by a trained professional. Disclaimer: These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of anything demonstrated in my videos is done AT YOUR OWN RISK.. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately.

[@thinkingimpaired5663]

Never underestimate the ability of the 9th circuit to misinterpret the law and continue to delay 2A rights.

[@ron6547]

They’re not misinterpreting it! They are ignoring it!

[@gunblade7610]

There should be a certain amount of "misinterpretations" you are allowed until the moment you are disbarred because clearly you don't know what you are doing as a judge. If a forklift operator keeps crashing into product, they get fired because they clearly can't do the job. We need to be able to fire government officials easier.

[@thetrutha2177]

I think you mean fascists, ignoring Americans rights.

[@MrZaza-wi7ou]

They’ll probably send it back down if that can Delay delay delay

[@UserUser14880]

Can you please do your sponsor advertisement at the end of your videos. Everytime your sponsor advertisement starts i get discouraged and dont finish watching.

[@lespaul36]

The 9th circuit doesn't care about doing what is lawful. It is an activist court.

[@garycallihan4206]

Ship the court to Pyongyang.

[@billmullins6833]

True that!

[@johnpopoff7950]

Ninth circus is a POS court.

[@teevee2145]

All are

[@pigxstix]

True, but they're actually not as bad as they used to be so there's still hope.

[@JoseyWales44s]

Unfortunately, the 9th Circuit is guided by political principles, not constitutional principles.

[@tomjackson4374]

Thomas has already said that the Second Amendment covers AR-15's and like rifles. It is way past time to make it official and the law of the land.

[@FIGGY65]

The 9th is guided by their collective ,activist mindset: Feelings/emotions, and virtue signaling hypocrisy.

[@333Kdigital]

17 goals for sustainable development, agenda 2030 (Agenda 21) not political principles. They are private agendas being pushed by their members who also hold positions of public service

[@Aerogamer158]

The 9th circuit also allowed open carry legal everywhere in its jurisdiction unless the state has a concealed weapon license.

[@Eddie87Grant]

@@JoseyWales44s you get it!!!

[@1776AxlePowerDM]

The 9th circus won't care what ruling comes out. Tyrants do not care about the Constitution or SCOTUS rulings. Thanks for all the research and hard work you do for us.

[@mutantryeff]

The 9th Circus should be fed to the circus lions

[@tomvana4270]

Time to let the 9th we mean business. Follow the United States Constitution!

[@svbarryduckworth628]

Too many clowns, not enough lions. Buy some chippers.

[@carguy3028]

I hope the ruling gives them the confidence to rule against us. We already know how they want to go, they were going to hold this case and delay as long as they can as long as they think they can’t rule against us. We want to loose quickly and get up to the Supreme Court.

[@marioarias9942]

Tyrants come from both sides of the political aisle now.

[@fmixthings]

California has a magazine disconnect requirement. Without a magazine, a pistol cannot fire. Therefore a pistol magazine is absolutely unquestionably an incorporated part of the firearm and therefore 2A applies.

[@meowzedonger]

This.

[@user-mb8js3cb4t]

Mine fires fine, yours is broken.

[@cops312]

@@user-mb8js3cb4tyou’re missing the point

[@atranimecs]

theyll say a 1 round magazine lol

[@THall-vi8cp]

@user-mb8js3cb4t Depends on when the pistol was added to the roster. New pistols have to have mag disconnects.

[@waynewilson4269]

It's time for citizens to sue bonta boi for unconstitutional keeping our rights from us.

[@aquariumdude7829]

It wouldn't matter. The state has unlimited financial resources and can afford to fight in the courts forever. The average citizen does not.

[@thinkingimpaired5663]

Becerra and Holder still negatively influence California law. Holder still gets paid too as a consultant. Eric converted to consultant after his employed position was revealed.

[@dannymarcil9475]

If they can limit them to ten ,they can limit them to 2

[@mariop8576]

Before you know it these tyrants will ban magazines altogether and we be left with single shot semi-autos.

[@GrySgtBubba]

Look no further than new jersey or new york...or Canada!

[@robertlawson698]

or zero!

[@davidnicholas7516]

If they can limit them they can completely ban them. And remember, they require every new pistol you buy have a "magazine disconnect" safety, which of course with a banned magazine you'd have an $800 paperweight.

[@saynotocensorship]

They’re working on it 🤬

[@Uberragen21]

I'll be 90 years old before this case or the AWB case is settled.

[@not-fishing4730]

I'm 70 now and I figure I'll be planted before many of these laws are overturned. I help and donate for my children and grandchildren so they can have some freedom in the Tyrannical State of California.

[@renehernandez6905]

@@not-fishing4730maybe by then they’ll have straightened it out

[@dtna]

I'll be dead. I purchased mine in the 20th Century. And Greasy Newsome will also put in his two cents. We'll see.

[@gilbertvargas4757]

I’m sad to say that might even be optimistic

[@aquariumdude7829]

Don't worry. California will have been annexed by China long before then! 😂 🇨🇳

[@AnthonyMihelich]

It really pisses me off that there was an ad with obama before this video asking to donate $5 for joe and kamala. KZbin does not know where to place ads lmao

[@gunztommiegunz]

FJB and democrats for the same reason.

[@kcstott]

Actually they do. KZbin gets paid for how many times an ad runs, not how many times someone clicks through. KZbin doesn't care if the ad hit the right audience or not. they get paid anyway.

[@lonniebeal6032]

I skipped the ad

[@casterakabadman805]

Yep and then when their advertisers complain they sabotage your channel to one degree or another lol can't believe the digital mayhem social media is these days. Just like anything it became another extreme smh

[@TheKorath1]

@@lonniebeal6032 I got Bidenomic must be stop at all cost ad.

[@anthonykaestner2051]

"Large caliber magazines". These ignorant judges are infuriating.

[@BrandensOutdoorChannel]

yep...

[@brawndothethirstmutilator9848]

People who know nothing about firearms or their functionality are ruling on the 2A….

[@randyhanson837]

Nobody needs more than ten clips in a magazine. LOL They should all have to take a basic competency course and test before ruling on things. The 9mm blows the lung out and a bump stock increases the caliber.

[@rflett5797]

Using the reasoning that a magazine is just an accessory and isn't necessary for the operation of a semi-auto firearm, is the same as saying a gas tank is just an accessory and is not necessary for the operation of an internal combustion engine.

[@robertbridges517]

An ink reservoir for a newspaper's printing press would be an accessory also and not necessary to print a paper. Dear LATimes... embrace you inner Ben Franklin and use only a single stage press.

[@gregkunkel708]

@@robertbridges517Who needs this new fangled offset printing. Long live letterpress! Long live the Linotype!

[@LARPeratorsAnonymous]

9th wont care, they will say any mags purchased during freedom week are illegal to posses, and we will have to continue to act like we (californians) care and just keep doing whatever we want 🤣

[@chiefjoseph8154]

California is a communist state voted in by communist.

[@unixsuperuser]

The tea pot is protected under the second amendment! If it is used as an arm! Which is precisely why the second amendment just says arms. Not guns, or knives, not cannons, but arms. Because anything can be used as an arm.

[@mb9662]

It’s almost like the 2nd amendment is meant to limit the government from ever disarming the people of any and all arms, be they guns or swords or armor or anything that a man may take into his hands to striketh at another or to defend against another.

[@PioneerRifleCompany]

Wow, another patriot! I literally just said the same thing in different words about the coffee pot. :)

[@phlodel]

@@PioneerRifleCompany We can use the teapot for an arm, since we threw the tea into the harbor.

[@CHEECHMUN]

100%. I thought the same.

[@brawndothethirstmutilator9848]

This is a very good point! I also like that a victory for this argument restores my right to carry a cutlass on my hip.

[@GreyBBeard]

Saying a magazine is an accessory is like arguing that a gas tank in your car is an accessory. They both serve the same purpose and capacity is an issue for the use of the item.

[@Norcal18]

👏🏼 👏🏼

[@Steve-xm3mv]

@@GreyBBeard we can take that farther to emission controls. The car runs better without them

[@stephensniff]

Absolutely insane how long this case has taken to go up and down and back around through the courts when this should be a clear and obvious infringement of our 2A rights in California.

[@davidmckinley5343]

The 9th circus will never do what is right or correct.

[@edweber9847]

If a magazine is not a threat because it can’t “attack anyone,” as the judge said, then why is CA trying to ban them?

[@omni1omni244]

Chinese have requested. As their soldiers enter America.

[@kbear6265]

If this ends at the 9th circuit my jaw will literally drop. I'll believe it when I see it. Optimism is a disappointing thing to have here in California

[@madcapmagician6018]

File a lawsuit against the 9th circus for delaying our rights. 10 year of delays is denial of our rights and the courts must be forces to finish and they must not be allowed to constantly remand... Or appeal.

[@dizzleslaunsen2372]

Why don’t you start the go fund me? If it’s so simple why is nobody willing to do it and only suggest other people do it?

[@billkraemer4710]

It’s time for scotus to jail California politicians. This endless cycle of harassment must stop.

[@cravenmoorehead6219]

I agree but when was the last time a politician went to jail. When's the last time one was even indicted 🤔

[@88kar88]

That requires action from the executive branch

[@YeomanArcher]

They need to make a 3 strikes rule and cool off period for new laws. If you propsed law fails 3 times in a row, bro, nobody wants it, stop spamming. Time out for 3 years.

[@aquariumdude7829]

They have no power to jail anybody and never did.

[@timswinscoe2895]

California has the stupidest rule where the firearm needs a magazine disconnect. That would not allow the gun to work if it didn’t have a magazine

[@coffeeandlifting]

I say this every time, but the courts are addressing this backwards. The issue is not about "large capacity magazines." It is about "limited capacity magazines. In other words, the burden is not on the People to prove that large magazines are constitutional, it is on the state to prove that limited magazines are constitutional. Magazines" themselves are self-evidently required for the functionality of constitutionally-protected arms. The question is wether or not the state can ARBITRARILY limit the capacity of those magazines and therefore the associated arms. Per Bruen, this is a cut-and-dry "NO" unless the state can find a historical tradition of laws limiting the capacity of arms, which by this point, we all no there is none.

[@PaulsColoradoPhotography]

I wanna copy this statement. It's absolutely perfect

[@timothyevans4323]

I’ve been saying this all along. We should have one case, direct to the SCOTUS, that ALL gun laws/rules are unconstitutional infringements. Furthermore any new gun laws/rules passed are a deprivation of rights under color of law, a felony under 18 USC, Sec 242 & 243.

[@FlyEaglesFly19111]

ANY state the refuses to abide by the courts should forefit all federal monies. Its atrocious that taxpayers have tp pay for all these herrings already. It should be re read.. not re written! Stay safe and be well.. God bless

[@noncompliant209cali]

It's astounding how many different anti gun politicians refer to them as "high CALIBER magazines"

[@funtime77777]

They are high caliber magazines. 😂 Thats why we want them. Too funny.

[@noncompliant209cali]

@@funtime77777 It's "High Capacity". Do you even own firearms? If you do you should really know the difference between caliber and capacity. The only thing they have in common is they start with the letter C

[@funtime77777]

@@noncompliant209cali It’s a play on words. High caliber: “highly capable”. I’d define my magazines as highly capable. Please stop attacking like minded individuals, unless you’re just trolling. In that case, please educate yourself. I’m pro 2A and in no way a supporter of morons. I’m going to chock your comment up, as a visceral reaction and miss understanding of my failed attempt at a joke.

[@kevinhoward5520]

😂💯

[@CL053DC45K37]

​@noncompliant209cali no they are standard capacity mags. Double stack 9mms come with 15+ round mags from the factory. They are standard capacity mags. A 30rd mag for an AR is a standard capacity mag because they are again what the factory sends with those rifles in most states. This 10rd mag bs is made up bs by politicians. The manufacturer of the firearms are in my mind the one who dictate what is standard capacity of their firearms not the government who is full of activists that want a communist state. These woke brain ded politicians are not firearms experts and therefore shouldn't be able to make up random bs without involvement of real experts I.E. people who actually know about firearms.

[@We_Got_A_Call]

The 9th circuit is like being seconds from climax and then your kids open the door.

[@brawndothethirstmutilator9848]

😂 💀

[@aquariumdude7829]

Yikes! An awkward situation! 😂

[@Dennisthemenace40]

I’m expecting the 9th Circus to sit on this case in perpetuity if they can’t find a way to, once again, “misinterpret” the plain language of the Supreme Court and the Constitution.

[@Calvin1911]

9th circuit judges should all be charged for never upholding Supreme Court rulings.

[@x3dominator28]

They should be impeached for sure.

[@lonniebeal6032]

@@x3dominator28 You spelled hung wrong...

[@AS768]

Being a firearms owner in a blue state is very exhausting. Greetings From the People's Republic of Washington State. Side note, we are dealing with the same thing. Our freedom week back in March lasted exactly 88 minutes before our prick of an AG ruined everything again.

[@tanglediver]

"Mr. Gambini, your witness." ~ "Mr. Tipton, when you viewed the defendants walking from their car into the Sac-O-Suds, what angle was your point of view?"

[@m.c.2c587]

One step forward, before the ninth makes us go two steps back. 😮

[@donrepcon7704]

The "ninth" is like everything else having to do with the California legal system. It's all a big joke just like the state's Governor, Craven Gruesome!

[@Steve-xm3mv]

If they made decisions off logic and law, it would have been settled already.

[@bigc2092]

Everything has been written well and straight to the point in our favor but like always you were wrong. Seeing as California has the 9th circuit in their pockets and regardless of any ruling they will do what they want without any consequences

[@thomaseynon6205]

9th will just sit on it, or pass it around for the next few years. I’d love to see this overturned. But even Bruen couldn’t even make it happen. California has a gift of rewarding, and contorting things into their favor.

[@KevTheHunter1]

Sooo did we win?

[@erniegarcia6372]

One downside is the rambling for 15 min then 2 min of some info.

[@Shenanigans318]

@@erniegarcia6372 the video is 11 minutes wrong. Work on basic counting first.

[@ltx383]

@@Shenanigans318lol corrects someone but doesn’t answer the question. Lol we never win my friend. Act accordingly and prepare accordingly F the Circus Court. He believes we will win in regards of how common sense the argument is but common sense is Latin in the 9th Circus court.

[@aquariumdude7829]

No.

[@aquariumdude7829]

​@@ltx383"Prepare accordingly" by leaving the state.

[@itzryyster]

So sick and tired of the laws with California. Complete clown show.

[@rid3withthewindvaj131]

I’ve left California two weeks ago and still watch this channel. It feels good to have a regular ar and regular magazine.

[@darkside59]

I've left California 4 years ago and am still watching these videos. Feel sorry for all my friends and families suffering with this crazy laws.

[@Empty_07]

Yup I got a few months ago too 😁

[@boostimalaka1]

Mark Smith, Four Boxes Diner has said the SCOTUS will not be taking any of these cases in the foreseeable future. The recent ruling from the SCOTUS on the three Illinois AWB cases and Antonyuk case from New York just put the 2A years away from being considered again being sent to the lower courts for review.

[@jimgordon3206]

The delay tactics employed be the courts should get a reprimand by the SCOTUS. This crap must stop. The magazine ban has been overturned and we should be able to have STANDARD capacity magazines which is whatever the manufacturer chooses to supply.

[@MotherGunner]

Why are you click-baiting us like you're Armed Scholar??I 😂😂

[@gunnbunny74]

Truth

[@aquariumdude7829]

It's all about soliciting for advertising revenues in the end. 😊

[@scottcampbell2585]

A couple of years ago a California county sheriff did a video on magazines with thirty rounds. The difference was a few seconds.

[@hylomane]

These "judges" are despots in robes. It's all a big show and they have the attitude to match. I have no respect for their "courts". They are propped up by power, not reason.

[@breakermorant2428]

Yes... the Robes... good movie with Oliver Reed. The Judiciary the Religious and the Educational Robes that think they still run the world.

[@yootoobvyooer]

If 2A is actually about firearms, you would need background check before posting and only allowed to post what's approved by government.

[@SteveMillerhuntingforfood]

In California; if you are caught with a loaded magazine, it is considered a loaded weapon.

[@gettinitinpodcast]

The right of the people to keep and be arms shall NOT be infringed.

[@Breezer56]

You would think these courts would follow the laws they swore to! Needs a change...

[@ZenoLycurgus]

Magazines are not just an accoutrement, magazines are essentially to arms as barrel shroud.

[@miltechmoto]

The simple response to the judges question is: where in the 2nd amendment does it say you can only bear arms if they're under a certain capacity? Why would the founder want less capacity if the whole point of the 2nd amendment was to provide security? So the founders wanted people to be under the capacity and outgunned in relation to equipment in common use?

[@johnpopoff7950]

Won't change anything for me regardless of whatever happens. I will conceal carry whenever wherever and however many rounds I want.

[@TurboCarlos]

Fed

[@jimgordon3206]

Don’t get caught. The entire purpose of concealing a weapon is no one knows you have it. What could be simpler. The only time it matters is if someone sees it or you have to use it.

[@brawndothethirstmutilator9848]

Cool story bro. If you get caught CA will throw the book at you and strip of 2A rights as a felon.

[@aquariumdude7829]

Please try not to get caught.

[@aquariumdude7829]

​@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848I know! Is it really worth it just to feel macho and feel like you somehow "stuck it" to the courts?

[@BV-fr8bf]

FLAW: @4.20 With Magazine disconnects, the magazine *IS* needed for operation of the pistol. "In California, an “unsafe handgun” includes any handgun that does not have both a chamber load indicator and *a magazine disconnect mechanism*

[@hanelyp1]

Loading the next round is part of normal operation for a modern firearm.

[@williamsweet7511]

Using the SAME argument, features should be off the table as well. If magazines are protected, so should full featured AR-15's.

[@user-wm5hk5fr4b]

It amazes me how they could say anything they want and keep controlling taking everybody freedom

[@snappertrx]

Don't be amazed. They do it because they believe nobody will stop them or hold them to account. So far they have been right.

[@mb9662]

Does the 2nd amendment cover this water pitcher? YES! If that water pitcher is taken into the hands of a man to use against another in defense of self or others.

[@jwar2163]

How many times does a law in California have to be ruled unconstitutional to finally be unconstitutional? It seems that the 9th Circuit court is working for the state of California and sides with the State Government over the Rights of the People Protected by the U.S. Constitution

[@Rollin.the.Wild.West.c14]

Yes they do

[@TrippiePineapplz]

Thanks for all the updates!!

[@petem6755]

Thanks for the updates brother. Great how you keep close track on this info, and break it down for everyone to understand, its incredibly important for everyone on our 2A rights.

[@ntran4211]

Of course a magazine part of “arms”. If it wasn’t then why would you want to ban it?

[@jayurias1292]

Honestly not going to wait for the laws to get better here. I'm taking my Red vote to a red state. 😂

[@lonniebeal6032]

What they failed to realize is that restricted magazines make it impossible to buy guns with those normal magazines

[@Franimus]

I'm worried the brief didn't spell it out that magazines by nature are armaments and therefore protected.

[@UscalisOldier]

Get ready for magazines to be serialized and background check 😑

[@SCIXFI]

A magazine is a critical component, not an accessory

[@EvanEverhart911]

Heck yeah, but theyll still argue that magazines are not necessary to arms and are not arms. The 9th are a bunch of sheisters.

[@KP-Pro2A]

Bearable arms includes offensive and defensive which includes body armor

[@mb9662]

It even includes water pitchers if you use it for self-defense and other lawful purposes of arms

[@88kar88]

It essentially encompasses combat equipment. The purpose isn't just to protect a firearm it is ARMS in general, and the equipment necessary for combat, including Armor, medical kits, camo, kneepads, helmets, night vision, flashlights boots, whatever is needed and used in the pursuit of being an effective combatant in a fight for the security of your person, property, loved ones, AND our nation. The military is generally a good place to look to find what is combat essential.

[@Valley710]

So when will we get a decision on this?

[@JasonRasmussen]

5097

[@Valley710]

Sounds about right lol

[@aquariumdude7829]

Never.

[@sammcbride2464]

Is there anything in the wording that prevents the government from putting a $10,000 tax on a firearm or bullets? That is what I am afraid of.

[@aquariumdude7829]

As a Floridian, I would probably start laughing! 😂

[@williamyoung5001]

Thanks for the update 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@jamesmoses8809]

The 9th keeps making the argument that magazines aren't necessary for the function of firearms but California made it MANDATORY that they not function without one with the introduction of magazine disconnects!

[@hic7021]

9th circuit doesn't care, watch then bury the case and prevent a final ruling from ever happening.

[@chethaynes5802]

Great Report. Thank You. CJTV

[@louismedina7821]

By what reason did California's law makers decide on 10 rounds why not 8 or 12 ? Also what's so up setting is that they are saying that California's law abiding citizens are not responsible enough to have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds. People in Arizona can have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds with no problems but Californian can't.

[@Franimus]

I got a 35 round magazine for my Glock, I love it. Can focus on plinking and training without so many mag changes! Yes, I purchased it as soon as I heard a nearby state was considering banning anything over 34 rounds.

[@joeparga1070]

Blows my mind as I can spend years in the Marine Corps as a armorer yet I’m not trusted enough to be able to own whatever pistol or rifle I want

[@theprinceofallsaiyans5830]

Not to mention that banning anything does not prevent it’s use from those who choose to use it. Which makes the idea for banning something to make life safer not a probable outcome. No one is going to consider an assault weapons or magazine ban before they illegally buy an automatic rifle with a drum mag out of the back of some dudes van. Its logicaly unsound and completely moronic

[@bw_kollectr]

Nothings gonna happen we are fucked forever

[@WcHDICE]

Cuz it's an spiritual battle good vs evil

[@user-nq2oz8tf2l]

Go be quiet and cry in the corner then.

[@johnniewasr5740]

You definitely are with that attitude

[@SamPedroCactus]

@@WcHDICE That is what it all comes down to.

[@therideneverends1697]

@@WcHDICE no, its really not

[@sammartinez8084]

Great show and thanks again for the info 👍👍👍👍😊

[@mr_fnh]

Video starts @2:25

[@mb9662]

Vid @2:25

[@JasonRasmussen]

10:50.

[@kassx1]

Doesn't the Puckle gun 1718 do away with the statement that the founding fathers couldn't foresee advancements in weaponry? Those men weren't backwards idiots, B Franklin and T Jefferson were highly intelligent and inventors.

[@scott2228]

So glad I don’t live in California. I’d constantly loose track of how many unconstitutional laws I was ignoring.

[@aquariumdude7829]

Don't worry. They would remind you after you got caught.

[@MexicanAmericanPhilippines]

There should be one law across the country. No state should have the right to infringe on 2a or any amendment

[@erikfrankfurt4650]

Thanks for not going off on random tangents or rants and just presenting facts. I greatly appreciate it.

[@johnkostick2041]

Cali will probably still cost a buck 50 to fill a 30 round mag after sales tax, extra 11% tax and $50 background check fee to purchase ammo.

[@PMD_Bill]

Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah, every time St. Benetiz writes a tome of how our rights are being trampled, we hear yet again how this is a "solid ruling" and a "slam dunk" that the 9th Circus...err... Circuit will just fawn, see the light and make amends for all their sins and we Californians will have our 2A rights restored in full. Dude, I wholeheartedly appreciate to the utmost your ability to explain these things in a common language, but I just cannot muster the same level of enthusiasm. The Nutty 9th, with it's comments of a coffee pot being comparable to an "arm" just says it all. Until SCOTUS has the balls to actually hear cases and rule on them instead of waggling their fingers at the lower courts for improper rulings and then kicking the can back to them "to get it right this time", nothing will change. Lastly - FJB!

[@user-wm5hk5fr4b]

Yeah, during real magazines been out for many years so all of a sudden people that have them say they cannot use them. It does not make sense banning magazines at the capacity they want to control punishing low by being citizens

[@isi12345]

The 2A does not protect non-arms....LOL, that's gotta be the funniest idiotic joke I've ever heard.

[@APatriotsPerspective1776]

You can't fix a corrupt broken system, using the same system, you abolish it and create a new system. New California State. The 51 state. Paul Preston. Share and support!

[@aquariumdude7829]

Nice dream but it won't happen.

[@user-kb7hz9sf9b]

I purchased a firearm in May 2024, and am still on delay. Went through with paying for a firearms Live Scan- and still on delay. Tired of this BS from the state of CA

[@BrandensOutdoorChannel]

it should be illegal for legislators and judges who know nothing about firearms to make laws and decisions on firearms regulation.

[@LarsBars17]

Remember, Duncan is also holding up Washington v. Gator’s Custom Guns, Brumback v. Ferguson, and Sullivan v. Ferguson. This would be huge!

[@rtwynn24]

I agree but this is the 9th ...are we really expecting them to follow the law or what the state wants

[@CL053DC45K37]

Phuck no we are not expecting them to follow the Supreme courts rulling or the constitution. These people will trample all over the rights of the people.

[@ron8566]

Well said and well presented. Thank you.

[@tdo7125]

I love your hope and enthusiasm, and wish the same. Just can’t get over the craziness of the circus 🎪

[@michaelmathers6739]

Has anyone ever asked how the 11 round makes a magazine deadly

[@aaronjohannsen5326]

All this posturing; does it protect dangerous arms, is it in common use, on and on to infinity. "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed" supercedes all of that nonsense.

[@mire2801]

The Ninth Circuit are experts at stringing Californians along, by giving us a bread crumb to make us feel optimistic. They keep the case going by requesting more information from plaintiffs ad infinitum. It’s a ruse. I’m not optimistic at all.

[@UncleMilty]

You'd think that to get to the level of a Federal judge one would have to have a great deal of intelligence. You'd think.

[@hanelyp1]

In an organized crime syndicate, like the current government, supporting the syndicate counts for more than smarts.

[@schwabit989]

The 9th Circuit makes me embarrassed to be an American……

[@lonniebeal6032]

Our forefathers would already have most democraps decorating trees...

[@willd7033]

Sad that we have to "keep up" with our rights. What other constitutional amendment is under this much subject to change?

[@brian03cobra]

I really enjoy how straight forward and to the point your videos are. 👍🇺🇲

[@RashiimAllen]

Magazine band are like allowing the bow, the arrow, but not the quiver.

[@kevos823]

They need to file another brief adding Thomas's Statements from cert denials in the Illinois cases