SURPRISE!!! Nikon 180-600 REVIEW: The BEST “Affordable” Wildlife / Sports Lens?!

FROPACK3 is HERE with 15 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.... (40% OFF)
This is a Review of the Nikon Z 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 Lens. I took it out into the real world to photograph at the Philadelphia Zoo as well as the Philadelphia Phillies. I used the lens on the Nikon Z9 and it will work perfectly well on the Z8 and modestly well in terms of auto focus on the Z6 II, Z7 II, Z5, Z50, Z30 and Zfc.
Order the Nikon 180-600 from Allen's Camera bit.ly/449oDie
Order from B+H bhpho.to/3NkWWwf
Listen to RAWtalk, the FroKnowsPhoto Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts. Or head on over to froknowsphoto.c...
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 and RF Canon Lenses Canon.us/r5fro
Artlist is where we get music and sound effects. Get 2 months free when you sign up for a year membership, head on over to bit.ly/froartlist
Order a Bernie Photo Book right here www.berniephot...
Download MyGearVault, it's FREE and the best way to keep track of all your camera gear, receipts, prices paid, date purchased and more mygearvault.co...
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknows...
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.c...
My Go To Mirrorless Camera for Stills
Canon R3 bit.ly/3hzfJVl Allen's Camera
Sony a1 amzn.to/2NHsm55 or bit.ly/3ccKZrt
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Our go to Cameras for Recording Videos at FroKnowsPhoto
Canon EOS R5 amzn.to/37GQQ5R or bit.ly/2Obaj40
Canon EOS R6 amzn.to/3m6JHQ9 or bit.ly/38GIdXt
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►KZbin: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto

[@camc545]

Nikon is making a nice comeback!

[@nirajgandhi5921]

Looks like another winner from Nikon!

[@jaimeduncan6167]

Nikon's telephoto range is the more complete in the mirrorless market right now. Unique lenses like the 400mm TC, the 600 TC, and the 800mm pf. Also common lenses like the. 400mm f4.5, the 100-400mm, and now the. 180-400 completing the line. Finally, if you are willing to use adapters you have lenses like the 300mm pf and the. 500mm pf.

[@robeson1231]

And the 120-300mm 2.8!

[@pentagramyt417]

I wish Sony do some competition do APS-C sensors... like 500 mm f4.5 .. or at least 400 mm f4

[@patrickmolloy6994]

thanks Jared.I have the z70-200 with the 2x as my stop-gap while I expected the 200-600 sometime maybe 2024 ! Ordered the 180-600 already. Great review. Best sniff test ever

[@FamilyofTech]

Amazing lens for wildlife! Preordered with no hesitation

[@dicekolev5360]

95mm filters are deal breaker for me so here is the hesitation for some people, haha

[@LincolnshireRailMonkey]

Just my opinion but Nikon is getting ahead in this mirrorless game with its lenses - amazing value for money, I don’t need this lens but Damn do I want it!

[@christophmayer3991]

In a world where E-mount and L-mount aren't open standards and third party lens manufacturers do not exists, you might be right. But imho the value Sigma, Tamron and alike provide to those camera systems makes them the better choice (if value is what you are after). E.g. the Sigma 150-600 f/5-6.3 costs $900 right now, that's about half of what Nikon asks!

[@LincolnshireRailMonkey]

@@christophmayer3991 tried the big sigma before and to be honest it was garbage

[@phelanwolf6747]

⁠@@christophmayer3991Tamron is allowed to make Z glas and some Tamron lenses are whitelabled as Nikon, for instance the 70-180 F2.8. The Sigma 150-600 is ok but that's it is heavy, not that sharp and not that fast. The Nikon 200-500 outperforms the Sigma but has shorter reach.

[@MTBD80]

@@christophmayer3991 Can easily run one of those on my Z6.

[@kichaa13]

@@christophmayer3991 it's also half the quality

[@tshev]

Distance to a subject and focal length is more important for background blur than the f-stop number. Going from 400mm to 600mm is the same as going from f/8 to f/3.5.

[@pahafx]

No way there is more than two stop difference with 400mm vs 600mm.

[@tshev]

@@pahafx DOF is quadratic with regard to the focal length and linear with regard to an f-stop number. (600 / 400)^2 ~ (8 / 3.5)

[@jessicadoell8635]

@@tshev Wait, you're telling me the quadratic formula from grade 10 math has actual real world application?

[@cy9nvs]

I've been wanting to switch systems (coming from fuji) for a long time now, and it always frustrated me how Canon has the right cameras but not the right lenses for me, while it was the exact opposite with Sony. Now out of nowhere within a couple of weeks Nikon has both. I think once this becomes available, I go grab a z8 + this Badboy.

[@Chris-13]

Absolutely right , I tried the Sony system after being a lifetime Nikon shooter and while the Sony is excellent at what it does it just didn’t work for me ergonomically. I bought the Z9 which is fantastic but heavy ! Saving for the Z8 now .

[@Uisci81]

@@Chris-13if you sell me the z9 for $500 that’s $500 closer to a z8 for you! Lol 😂

[@frankseophotos9633]

As a Canon shooter, I fully agree

[@Chris-13]

@@Uisci81 🤔🤔😂😂😂😂

[@patm9351]

the Z8 is the best camera on paper when you account for specs and price, but its AF is still a tier below Canon and Sony, which makes its high FPS kinda moot if you're gonna be trashing a lot of shots. Sony would kill the market if they released an A1-spec camera at the Z8's price point. It's been 2.5 years, surely they've got the manufacturing costs down enough that they can do that? If the A9iii is 24MP again, I can't see the point of it. Gotta be at least 33 but even then, 40+ would be ideal.

[@kqschwarz]

One of the best reviewers on KZbin, plus there is a ton of humor. Very nice. Thank you.

[@antonoat]

Jared, loved the positive up-beat review! I think Nikon have knocked it clean out of the park with this lens, they are going to sell loads more than they can make! 👏😀👍 Massively pleased its an internal zoom, like my old 200-400 f4 vrII!

[@CostaMesaPhotography]

A very nice and comprehensive review Jared. I value your feedback so I'm especially appreciative of your comments here.

[@keeganflahive1604]

As a canon shooter I am so jealous. Canon only has the 100-500mm f4.5-7.1. For almost $3k. It’s ridiculous

[@PhillyAvGeek]

Get the Sigma 60-600, I mean you’ll be using an EF adapter but it’s a great versatile lens. And only $1999. And the 150-600 version is only $900

[@rpungello]

to be fair the 100-500 is an L lens so probably has better coatings & snappier AF vs. this non-S Nikon

[@Zap09060]

Canon has some of the most stupid telephoto lenses 600 mm f11 / 800 mm f11… f11 that’s freaking ridiculous

[@haydennettleton3272]

​@@rpungello stop defending Canon. The 100-500 is overpriced big time. There is a video on here comparing the older Nikkor 200-500 which is selling for $1050usd to the $3000 Canon. Sharpness was similar and the Canon actually had worse focus breathing.

[@matthewbell1968]

@@photobunny This. The Canon 100-500 isn't cheap that I'll agree to but it's absolutely one of the best zooms out there and will beat a Tamron 180-600 copy hands down.

[@AlwaysWildCS]

I'm happy NIKON IS BACK.

[@slyfox720]

I had the 200-500mm and at the time I thought that for the money it was the best lens....well I lost my job and have been out of a job for almost 8 months and used up all of my savings and had to finally selll my gear....I have since found a new job and just waiting on background check to finally clear...this is the lens I will be saving up for....super. excited for a mirrorless lens that is comparable to the 200-500mm

[@Razor2048]

For many teleconverters their benefit depends on the resolving capability of the central area of the lens. If the lens is acting as an OLPF even in the center, then a teleconverter will not offer any meaningful benefit while introducing many negatives. On the other hand, if the lens is outresolving your sensor, then there will be a massive benefit from the teleconverter.

[@jss27560]

One thing I always ask when talking about teleconverters is if you have 20 pictures in front of you, could you tell the difference between those shots with the teleconverters and those without?

[@12w3hji123456789]

Nikon is on a very good path - seems they do a lot of things right

[@bigbrownmab189]

The internalk zoom is super awesome, specially when shooting in inclement weather, thanks for the video as always !!

[@northofbrandon]

Agreed ! Looks like I will replace my 200-500 F5.6

[@popcornparam]

Nikon has fully fleshushed out it's lens line up to max spec ... Now canon is the sleeper of the bunch ... For the past 20 years we have been asking for a 600 zoom from canon ... And no response .....

[@Charlie_YS]

I chose the right path among the three best selling brands on the planet, Nikon you did not disappoint me, you please me even more with those impressive lenses. If the good is already here in 2023, which awaits us in the coming years, surely many more wonders 👏👏

[@Roothlas]

Man i just got the z50 i know its not the best for wildlife but i will have to get that lens for it and buy a better camera later

[@JgHobley]

Sounds great for aviation too!

[@SolamenteVees]

Holy crap. I can finally strap a proper Z lens to my Z6ii.

[@saabvanderlinden9214]

My thoughts too🎉

[@vueport99]

How's the AF performance of this lens on a lower line body?

[@drpork1360]

For 1600 bucks, this is quite possibly the best value for money.

[@matthewbell1968]

Just like the old 200-500 that was a great lens

[@drpork1360]

@@matthewbell1968 never had the pleasure to shoot with that lense, but never doubted it when I saw Jared's review on it.

[@jrodewald2010]

@@matthewbell1968 That lens never failed me, it was tack sharp all the time.

[@matthewbell1968]

@@jrodewald2010 agreed. For me the difference from the pf was minimal.

[@matthewbell1968]

@@drpork1360 best value lens I've ever had!

[@CFDEngCo3]

I know what you are all here for. Sniff test: 15:40, Wind tunnel test: 15:58

[@syksystransitagency]

you know it!

[@jamesnelson1443]

Love the sniff test & wind tunnel test!!!!!

[@abhinavashishaind]

Now the market is getting intresting. With Sony 200-600, Canon 100-500 and now the Nikon 180-600. Jared hopefully a comparison is coming soon.

[@thefourthquarter7429]

I would never consider the Canon. Much higher price and F7.1. Why?

[@abhinavashishaind]

@@photobunny oh yes I completely forgot about that category. 🤣

[@barryscully1820]

Pretty much looks like the Sony 200-600 with an extra 20 mm on the wide end....and that is a good thing as the 200-600 is likely my most used lens. Good to see Nikon having something similar to use with the Z8. That is a fantastic and reasonably priced combination for nature photography with a stacked sensor camera. OK, Sony where is your reasonably priced stacked sensor high resolution camera :)

[@rickscott9388]

I left Nikon for Sony early in the mirrorless revolution but this might make me want to come back. That Z8 paired with this lens sizzles!!! ;-) Thank Fro!

[@ArnaudLerondeau]

Clear, factual, perfectly illustrated, and not too long : one of your best (pre)review video ever 👍👏👏👏👏

[@khooyeesin9766]

Canon people are sleeping. They are not like the Nikon people who always have hearts for all types of photographers. Congratulations to Nikon, the budget photographers will always appreciate your strategy for all players ❤

[@denisnicholson2528]

This lens looks awesome. I was looking at the Sigma/Tamron 150-600, or even the Sigma 60-600. The fact that this is a Z lens, no need for an FTZ adapter is a win. The biggest one for me is the internal zoom. The price as well is absolutely insane. This is definitely on my wish list.

[@tomgodzik8951]

Thanks Jared for pointing me to the Nikon 180-600mm lens. Like you say glass glass glass. My pictures are great now with the Nikon Z50 camera shooting in JPEG. I record 4 short videos of a softball game and it was tack sharp. For me it was a great investment. Your videos are top notch. Thanks for sharing your experience with me. ❤❤❤

[@ridealongwithrandy]

As a Nikon and Olympus shooter, I thought i would drop in on THE most entertaining camera dude on the internet. I had the 200-500, way too heavy for what i got. Boy oh boy, a Nikon Z9 and this lens ... gold baby!

[@Zap09060]

Thank God … this time you didn’t say it’s a Gorilla Focus problem with Nikon and they suck 😂 Truth is Nikon is on a roll and now it has even better lens collection than any other system period and a topping on that is Z9 and Z8. You can’t say Nikon sucks anymore. Which other system has this kind of lens collection at “affordable” price points with “great quality”: 1) Z 400 4.5 - what a lens - no match for it in other systems 2) Z 100-400 mm f5.6 3) Z 180-600 4) Z 70-180 5) Z 400 f2.8 with inbuilt TC (Game changer no one has it) 6) Z 600 mm f4 with inbuilt TC (no other system has this kind of lens) 7) Z 800 mm f6.3 - $6500 telephoto lens… no other system has it… period. Whole bunch of other small primes and medium telephoto lenses They just need to release Z500 equivalent of D500… all other systems are then done for good.

[@tcwhite0104]

I'm ordering one today!!! Skittles is my go to preset..

[@zygmuntziokowski7877]

Good Review! I like what I see and 180-600 will bet on my wish list.

[@KSergey1970]

Very strong photo processing. Unnatural contrast.

[@jrodewald2010]

I'm almost always stepped down due to what I photograph, but honestly how much are we really worried about f4 vs f6 at say 500 mm with today's editing tools to blur backgrounds? On film, totally understood. Looking forward to this lens!

[@TheExtraTerrestrial]

I'm finding that tne new denoise feature in LR Classic is really nice. Makes photos taken with my 1" sensor cameras look great, and seems to retain detail.

[@kllee6368]

I got one. I will test this lens by next week for Rugby game with my Z9.😊

[@dirkzengel4197]

I really like the internal zoom. I had it twice were it was cold, stormy and raining and I need to shoot a TV Show MAZ Production. (This days I worked with Sigma 60-600 mm) and even I had a rain cover on it, the rain found his way by sliding the zoom inside and after the half I had change it... lucky it came easily also out but them close to the heatingradiator. But I had to change after the half production from 60-600 to 70 - 200 (nothing else with me). (The rain was so hard and heavy, I weared army-Boots, Jeans a army rain jacket and on top of it one of the plastic Rain-covers giving to the audience (yeah there were hardcore audience this days) and the rain found his way from my boots, up to my jeans, into my underpants, t-shirt to the inside of my shirt und wet all my army rain jacket from inside.... )

[@frankseophotos9633]

I guess it's time to switch to Nikon from Canon. The biggest frustration as a Canon shooter is that Canon only has cheap shitty non WR lenses or ridiculously expensive and heavy L lenses. All I need is a moderate lens like Z 50mm f1.8, not Rf 50mm f1.8 nor f1.2.

[@howiesternphoto]

almost every canon pro lens is lighter than nikon...rf 70-200 2.8 is the smallest and lightest of all three brands, rf 50 1.2 is much smaller than Nikon 50 1.2, Canon 85 1.2 is smaller than Nikon 85 1.2. They really isn't much difference in price between pro glass from different brands.

[@frankseophotos9633]

@howiestern3972 I am talking about moderate options, not the weight. Most people don't need bulky and heavy f1.2 lenses. Decent f1.8 lenses are more than enough for most shooters. The issue of Canon is there are no decent moderate lenses.

[@michaelgomez4314]

​@@howiesternphotocanon lens cheaper? You are duped big time bro

[@howiesternphoto]

@@michaelgomez4314 bro, lol...They are all roughly the same, within 10% brah.If you're a pro, it don't matter. You use what works for you.

[@bizzeebee6178]

Bought this lens about 4 weeks ago and it has exceeded my expectations, fantastic sharp images across the whole range. Only using it for sports and it’s a superb lens for this, fast focus, good tracking and cut your skin sharp. On a z6ii now, can’t wait to see what it will do on a 6iii …..

[@TheRunnerBrett]

Just wanted to let you know, I have enjoyed your reviews. The humor is great too-it’s free!! Thanks!

[@baljindersinghsidhu3959]

I'm definitely going to buy this amazingly cheap lens..❤impressive..

[@bobbullethalf]

Nikon just solved a conundrum for me with this lens, it will be in my bag!

[@kevc.2958]

that lens makes me wanna get the Z8。

[@photoreviewed-com]

Finally quite affordable and capable telephoto for Z lineup!

[@formicapple2]

Thanks for the review Jared. I’ve not watched you for a couple of years and forgot how informative and interesting your posts are.

[@bobbullethalf]

Just got mine yesterday and it is a dream to shoot with. That reach is just priceless!

[@Strodav]

Thanks for review. This is my next lens.

[@randfee]

Man do i envy people that have other systems. I made the apparent mistake to stick with canon, moving from EF to RF and boy do they charge for the few lenses available. The 100-500 is like twice what this Nikon costs and probably not better (smaller aperture) and besides that there’s only a low end 100-400. I feel entirely ripped off, having expected that there would be third-party RF lenses just like with the other brands. I would NOT have purchased an RF camera and some lenses had i known at the time that canon would restrict others from offering AF lenses. At all the Nikon Z mount shooters: enjoy the lens, I wouldn’t even hesitate ordering it.

[@michaelgomez4314]

Cut your loses and switch

[@randfee]

@@michaelgomez4314 I'm waiting until I really need another lens and if there's still no sigma, tamron and non high- or low-end glass from Canon, I'll switch to sony. I will dread the ergonomics, but enjoy the much wider lens selection.

[@garfieldirwin]

Nothing wrong with the AF in any of those shots! ;)

[@lsaideOK]

This is one of the first Z lenses I have seen that economically transitions quite smoothly from the f mount variant. Affordable. Should be a top seller as you say. Nice that the quick readout of the Z9 sensor gives you a round ball.

[@Wizzardus]

1/3 more expensive than the 200-500 is far from economicaly smooth transition ...

[@lsaideOK]

@@Wizzardus really? Because they're such a thing as inflation and $1400 in 2015 actually equals $1796 today. So $3 difference. Sue me.

[@mikehl_photo]

the lens I've been waiting for! :)

[@carlz3955]

Nikon system is getting more and more room to play with right now, I have a R6 and still stuck with old tamron EF lens because RF lens is rare like Unicorn and too expensive for hobbyist like me. Hope Canon will official allow third-party lens really soon.

[@IliasKoureas]

Even if they do (which I highly doubt) it will take years and years to form a respectable third party lens lineup

[@AReese-eu5zs]

Awww, I’ve been waiting for this one!

[@thegrumpycanadian274]

Ahhh Crap!!! Now I have to go out and buy a Nikon Body too!

[@joboee]

Now we just need a mirrorless version on the D500 and I will be fully back to Nikon 🤪

[@bencollins7684]

Z8, and it also gives you full frame

[@jamesma524]

While the Z8 is an incredible camera and the only camera I currently have, not everyone can or want to spend that much money on a body. Z6iii/Z90/Z500 make a lot of sense for many others, although my top choice would remain Z8 even given those choices.

[@MTBD80]

@@jamesma524 When adjusted for inflation the Z8 is only $500 more than the D500 when new.

[@MaskedWings-r4y]

Great post, as always, Jared. I've been waiting for this beast for a long time and it looks like I'm going to get just what I was waiting for...

[@Europa1010]

There is a possibility of 200-600mm S lens in the future!

[@bjrn-einarnilsen687]

As always, a informative video, with a lot of beautiful shots. Start wondering if it's time to sell all my Canon gear, and switch to Nikon. Canon is really falling behind when it comes to affordable lenses.

[@AlanMcLaren]

I just received my copy after ordering it on the first day. I was excited until I FOUND THIS LENS DOES NOT DO "FOCUS RECALL with Z6, and this was one of the reasons I purchased this lens. Nikon informed me that I need a newer Z Camera for this function to work. I do not have other z cameras to see how this works on them. If the lens had a second L-fn2 button it could work like the 70-200mm f2.8. this is a consumer lens, that needs new updated z Cameras, yet the Pro lens works on the older z Cameras

[@saraxoxoish]

Do you think it be good to use with Nikon Z50?

[@badger67]

No reason not too.

[@dr_squirrel]

And suddenly a lot of Canon shooters getting jealous (including my old self)

[@hilarydavis4959]

Great video Jared just recently subscribed I like your content glad i found you! I think i am going to purchase the Z8, and definately the 180-600mm thanks for all the info much appreciated!

[@q5rwi1]

Jared, I want that flamingo print. It's gorgeous!

[@peterdecroos1654]

been travelling the world and using teh 24-200 as my daily driver lens. this is the first lens from nikon in awhile that makes me scream "shutup and take my money." The versatility is hard to beat and I see a lot of places where I can make use of this

[@meynp4337]

Wow, $300 cheaper than the Sony lens, and 20 mm wider. Good job Nikon.

[@TheDeltaMoo]

And a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.25x vs 0.2x on the Sony. It took them a long time to release the lens but they sure did a great job

[@MOTOJendays]

Well.. Sony 200-600 was $2k on release. These days you can find it new under $1.7k so yeah, but actually no. Either way both great options for what you pay depending on what system you own.

[@cbmore28]

Just saw this video along with the latest Z6 III previews. Looks like it could be an interesting pairing.

[@bernardlanguillier7970]

The lead Nikon is taking in mirrorless is unheard of. What's most remarkable with this 180-600 is the bokeh, just beautiful! I totally disagree about tele-converters. My results are the exact opposite of yours, TCs, in particular very high end teleconverters such as the Z ones, make a significant difference over cropping. But of course admitting this means that you would also have to admit that the Nikon 400mm f2.8 TC and 600mm f4 TC are game changers vs the Canon and Sony offerings, which you don't want to do...

[@mawasorangutan]

Almost nothing changes in quality for 1.4x TC, avoid the 2x TC

[@tonygreenmike]

its good that Jared is doing the wind tunnel test after the sniff test 😁

[@allangault9500]

The flamingo photos are awesome.

[@martinsarre]

Great review Jared. You are wrong about the z 1.4 teleconverter though. In daytime light it makes no difference to sharpness or picture quality . I use mine all the time

[@froknowsphoto]

I disagree .

[@andrewbutler9533]

Well done Nikon, now how about a Z-D500?

[@andrewbutler9533]

@@photobunny A Z90 that could potentially be a mini Z9 would be the best result - in the same way as the D500 is a mini D5.

[@BennyBlawnk]

Damn I should of kept my Nikon camera

[@Greglina]

I been listening to your podcast lately.... Enjoying it

[@socom915]

Along with wildlife I am hoping that this lens will be good for taking pictures of the moon

[@JasonLorette]

I was eyeing the 100-400, but the price tag was rough...this is verrrry intriguing!

[@marlonking5924]

Wish canon had one in this price point. It’s not a lens I would use all the time so the 100-500 is a hard sell for almost 3k 🥴.

[@dalekeith4961]

Nice review. I have the 100-400 ZS lens. As soon as my local shop get a 180-600 in inventory, I will do my own side-by-side comparison. The 180-600 looks good. Saw you comment on the Fro packs. I will explore them next. Thank you

[@EsenciaBiblica]

Hi Jared, Which Nikon camera do you recommend for photographing airplanes with a Sigma 150-600mm F5 - 6.3 DG lens | Contemporary? What if I need an adapter? Thanks!

[@derbagger22]

What I love to do with my Canon R6 and Sigma 150-600 is to use a Peak Design hand strap. I run my hand through and hold the lens by the tripod foot with a couple fingers. I've hiked miles and miles holding my camera that way.

[@abhishekshah11]

Why not use just a regular shoulder strap at that point? The PD hand strap is intended to use with lighter cameras

[@henrilindenhof7791]

Whatever makes you tick…

[@derbagger22]

@@abhishekshah11 putting weight on my shoulder and having the whole thing bounce off my hip while I'm hiking/walking? No thanks.

[@csc-photo]

@@derbagger22 With Peak Design and the BlackRapid (RS-4 Retro) straps, you can very easily cinch up the strap so the camera & lens rest comfortably on your torso / stomach, ABOVE the waist, when you're on the move.

[@derbagger22]

@@csc-photo An R6 with a Sigma 150-600? Resting above my torso? Maybe for you. No way for me. Besides, I enjoy carrying it with one hand and allowing the weight to help me walk and keep the weight off my center and make it easier for my knees. I already have the Leak Design shoulder sling strap. I use it all the time. But I'd much rather have that Sigma's weight on my hand than on my back. If one hand does eventually get tired(after miles), I can switch hands. I won't be able to shoot something as quickly as when it's in my right hand, but it's close.

[@dirkziegler9580]

Thank you for your hint about the Teleconverter. I had the same with a SIGMA TC-1411 (1,4x L-Mount). The quality was noticeably worse with the Teleconverter than without.

[@dangallagher8034]

Nice review. Thank you Jared.

[@craiglindholm6338]

Off-topic somewhat but I’m assuming you apply your fro pack presets to all of your pictures… Would it be possible to add which preset (if any) you’re using when you display the photos?

[@froknowsphoto]

Good idea. We will look into it. But most nature photos and the sports ones are going to be skittles modified.

[@barryobrien1890]

Reminds me of my Sigma 150 to 600 i use with the adapter. This is a bit lighter and sharper.

[@alvaro978]

Great video! Thank you so much. And what is your opinion with a Z50?

[@FabulousPepper]

Same question here. I used my Z50 with the latest software update and it was quite successfull at an aviation show this past weekend ...

[@savageogie2988]

Paired with the Z9 how to you think the 180-600mm would perform at airshows? Especially compaired to the old 200-500mm?

[@Canon1DMkII]

That is a sweet looking lens. At this price point, the Z shooters will be incredibly happy.

[@kultursender6507]

*Great Lens and great hair!* 👍👍👍

[@chrisshubin6936]

Expect to see a head-to-head battle between Sony 200-600 and Nikon 180-600 !🤩

[@thisisbenji90]

For all the hate Nikon fanboys give you, you’re the first review I wanted to watch on this lens!

[@mattiasbacklund5617]

This has so amazing quality, and internal zoom!! Does this dilute the "S" branding and price tags? Now what doeas "S" really stand for?

[@mluu83]

More coatings/exotic lens elements for better image quality, build quality, AF motors/AF speed, buttons/controls, synchro VR to name a few.

[@mattiasbacklund5617]

@@mluu83 ok, so within the overlapping zoom range, the 100-400S is superior?

[@bsc001]

@@mattiasbacklund5617 Steve Perry tested the 180-600 vs 100-400, 600 and 800 lenses. From what I recall, the 100-400 was slightly sharper at 200mm vs the 180-600, but after that, the 180-600 outperformed it all the way to 400. This cheap Lense was even very strong against the expensive primes Center frame, only slightly weaker in the corners. Please search his video for this comparison.

[@chrisstreet1994]

Wow! You always surprise, great review!

[@GjrygjfgcRfyghgkiy]

Love Nikon's performance, I bought a whole set filters from Kase for it. It's good for landscape photography.

[@stoufenatz3728]

Thanks a lot for this great review Jared !

[@unknownKnownunknowns]

Awesome Jared!. How do you feel it compares to the 100-500 Canon or 200-600 Sony for IQ and Blown out background?

[@garnerboyd4206]

Great Pic's Love this set up. Z8 + 180 to 600mm. Got to get it.

[@MykeHawke-r9r]

Thank you

[@joshuaconti989]

loved your wise words on teleconverters. currently using my 200-500 and cropping in if needed. would do the same with this lens. dont invalidate your aperture and focus.

[@northofbrandon]

Yes and no. The Version 3 TC's have very little impact to focus, and the 1.4x is applied to your focal RANGE as well. It's not like zooming in post is a free lunch: you lose pixel density and get closer to noise doing this. I think DX and Nikon's 2.3x 120p IRL sensor zoom options should be discussed more w Z8/9 than zooming on computer -- having the EVF also zoom in is niiiiiiiice

[@MTBD80]

@@northofbrandon Also the Z Tc's perform very well with right lenses, especially the 1.4x (having rented it).

[@PhotosByCG13]

i'd be curious to see how this would be at the race track when there's some distance from media boxes