SUSY and Particle Physics, Part 1 - Nima Arkani-Hamed

SUSY and Particle Physics, Part 1
Nima Arkani-Hamed
Institute for Advanced Study
July 21, 2010

[@eddievangundy4510]

So, so great. Thank you, Dr. Arkani-Hamed. Will also listen to the 2017 lecture for more recent perspective.

[@spartansEXTEEL]

No susy. Nima is awesome! Much luv.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Professor Arkani-Hamed has focused on the significance of AM-FM Communication In-form-ation. It's about time duration timing modulation manifestation.

[@chiccorealo]

Ascension codes @39.24. Missing particle...fix it?

[@carnsoaks1]

May IAS submit something more recent from prof A-H. So much happened since 2010. Higgs, MSUSY, G.W / G.R Ads/CFT Advnces, and would love to her his development on these topics & Professors ideas, LIKE AMPLITUHEDRON toy model

[@Zabberoni]

These lectures are from 2010.

[@scientiaetveritas40]

Of the things you've mentioned, only the Higgs and gravitational waves have actually been detected. No evidence for SUSY or MSUSY. And the cosmological constant happens to be a positive number, which says our universe isn't an Anti-DeSitter space. So the AdS/CFT correspondence, while an interesting MATHEMATICAL curiosity, has no bearing on actual physics describing THIS universe.

[@robertvarner9079]

SUSY is DEAD...DEAD...so DEAD.

[@Channel-ng1mn]

There are many versions of susy, most of them are very alive.

[@scientiaetveritas40]

@@Channel-ng1mn Yes, some theorists want to keep the grant money flowing, so they come up with more excuses, like susy will be detected with the NEXT collider, etc. There is absolutely zero reason to believe them - The LHC can acheive c-o-m energies in the TeV range, yet no one has EVER found even a single "selectron", the electron's super-partner. There is no reason to think SUSY is anything but a failed model. Yes, the minimally supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) ties up some theoretical loose ends , but again there's no evidence it's actually correct (by correct I mean experimentally verified). We need new physics to be sure, but we won't get there by pursuing dead-ends.