F.A.Q Section Q: Do you take aircraft requests? A: I have a list of aircraft I plan to cover, but feel free to add to it with suggestions:) Q: Why do you use imperial measurements for some videos, and metric for others? A: I do this based on country of manufacture. Imperial measurements for Britain and the U.S, metric for the rest of the world, but I include text in my videos that convert it for both. Q: Will you include video footage in your videos, or just photos? A: Video footage is very expensive to licence, if I can find footage in the public domain I will try to use it, but a lot of it is hoarded by licencing studies (British Pathe, Periscope films etc). In the future I may be able to afford clips :) Q: Why do you sometimes feature images/screenshots from flight simulators? A: Sometimes there are not a lot of photos available for certain aircraft, so I substitute this with digital images that are as accurate as possible. Feel free to leave you questions below - I may not be able to answer all of them, but I will keep my eyes open :)
@zxbzxbzxb12 жыл бұрын
Don't know if they're on your list, but they are interesting, the Tarrant Tabor and the Linke-Hoffman R.8/15 would be great to see. Apparently a pilot described the latter as 'not an aircraft, but a sickness' or words to that effect!
@mdcampbell73602 жыл бұрын
I'd be interested in Polish aircraft of the 30s.
@brendonbewersdorf9862 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for covering this aircraft it's one of my favorite lesser known planes!! If at all possible could you cover the finnish aircraft that looks similar to the bf109? (the name is so complicated I won't try to spell it)
@RexsHangar2 жыл бұрын
@@zxbzxbzxb1 The Tabor is on my list, but I have now added the R.8/15 too :)
@RexsHangar2 жыл бұрын
@@mdcampbell7360 I've got a few video scripts half finished on some Polish designs, I'm just waiting on a book to arrive that covers some of the finer details :)
@persjofors25862 жыл бұрын
Having served in the Swedish airforce, and having an interest in aircraft history, I found this video very interesting. I've read about the first SAAB plane but the video makes history more alive.
@lunabobles45262 жыл бұрын
What aircraft did you fly if you have
@jonremmers18282 жыл бұрын
About three years ago, while waiting for amuch delayed friend just outside Linköping, I saw the airworthy B17 flying around the city. I dunno why it was up there, but I was surprised at how long it was buzzing around. Well over 45 minutes. It was flying surprisingly low. The sound of the engine was spectacular!
@TorielloAt1702 жыл бұрын
B17 or B17?
@RocketSailing2 жыл бұрын
Living in Linköping, and a former SAAB employee. It was nice to see this video. The airworthy B17 pops up in the sky, now and then. Saw it a cpl of months ago, training or doing a display over malmen airfield. Fun to see they give it a proper go, now and then.
@larsrons79372 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: After WWII when demand for warplanes decreased and SAAB started producing cars they painted them with leftover aircraft paint, and continued paint the cars in these colours up through the 60's. My father had such a light blue SAAB car when I was a child, and in my garage I still have ½ a small can of original light blue paint from the SAAB company. Perhaps some vintage car owner could use it?
@austinm.983211 ай бұрын
The old SAAB cars are definitely really cool, with some real oddball stuff like a 2-Stroke sports car.
@pontushaggstrom62616 ай бұрын
That paint is probably long gone.
@larsrons79376 ай бұрын
@@pontushaggstrom6261 Yes for sure. I guess it only lasted for some years, but then they seem to have kept the colour scheeme after the original paint ran out. My father's late 1960s SAAB was light sky-blue, like underneath a warplane's wings. I still have a small can of original SAAB paint. It has been opened but there's still liquid inside. I guess it's about half full.
@shawnbeckmann18472 жыл бұрын
That landing gear setup is actually pretty cool
@EstorilEm2 жыл бұрын
Meh, ugly engineering hack to save money and make life easier. It’s hideous and cheap IMHO.
@wyverncoch44302 жыл бұрын
Weirdly most people like the wings of a dive bomber to stay with the plane when it’s diving, apart from that, it seems to be a successful aircraft!!
@unknowntraveller86332 жыл бұрын
Meh wings are overrated me thinks
@jakobholgersson44002 жыл бұрын
Wings only cause drag when diving. The tail is more than adequate to steer.
@barkebaat2 жыл бұрын
The upside to having the wings fall off in the dive is that now the whole plane is a dive bomb. BANZAI !!!
@calvingreene902 жыл бұрын
@@unknowntraveller8633 That kind of thinking led to the F-104.
@Riccardo_Silva2 жыл бұрын
An interesting little plane! It bears some resemblance to the SB2c.
@DABrock-author2 жыл бұрын
I thought it looked more like some Vought aircraft, like the OS2U Kingfisher. The tail especially reminds me of that plane and the F4U Corsair.
@Riccardo_Silva2 жыл бұрын
@@DABrock-author Yes, true!
@jamesbugbee9026 Жыл бұрын
From the time i found this a/c in Green's 1955 Combat Aircraft, w/ that big American greenhouse canopy & clean look, it was a favorite
@scotiadrake42452 жыл бұрын
I owned a Saab once, the car, not the aircraft, although I bought it because of the aircraft. It was an old Saab 900 OG and a fun machine to drive. We painted it army green and gave it Swedish military markings.
@kevineckelkampe2r2 жыл бұрын
I still have my 1985 Saab 900 and had an 86 turbo 900 yrs ago...
@johnwkindig16132 жыл бұрын
Absolutely love you covering the more outlandish designs of the interwar period!
@Channelscruf2 жыл бұрын
More SAABs please! Good stuff.
@JohnJohansen22 жыл бұрын
Best cars and best modern fighters, produced in south a small country, is extremely impressive. My country had the J 35J Draken. Actually I one day observed two of them, playing fight over my nabouring fjord. One thing I observed was the cobra maneuvers. I recognize that my memories are way later than this great video. I just couldn't help it.
@wkelly30532 жыл бұрын
From the USA, and as a former kid from the '70's, the Draken impressed me as quite the cool airplane. There were some flying in California many years ago at the National Test Pilot School in the city of Mojave, but not recently.
@Colt45hatchback2 жыл бұрын
I miss saab cars. My family had a 1986 9000 turbo, manual transmission in a metallic silver blue which changed from silver to blue depending on light and angle, which had purple velour interior, an 87 non turbo dark red with beige velour interior and an automatic trans, and a turbo automatic 1988 9000 in thr same red with beige/tan leather interior. The manual one was my favorite to drive but i always lusted over a white one which was also turbo manual with black velour i used to see often in town. We had those cars for many years. Untill 2009. We would have kept them forever but it became difficult to keep the electronics working as the hot australian summers here made the plastic sheathing on the wiring loom in the dashboard all crumble off the wire and caused short circuits and intermittant faults. Aside from that. They were the nicest non japanese car ive ever owned, and i would love to have another one someday. Perhaps one that has spent more time in a garage than outside. I would get another wiring loom made to suit it so there was no risk of fire or of the car turning off at random.
@EstorilEm2 жыл бұрын
Best cars and best modern fighters? lol wow. 🤣 Their car division is bankrupt and had bizarre unreliable vehicles for decades; their aircraft division’s “crowning achievement” is a non-stealth 1980s-era short-range fighter in the Gripen. No, just… no.
@JohnJohansen22 жыл бұрын
@@EstorilEm Do you feel better now?
@nehcrum2 жыл бұрын
@@EstorilEm The car division was separated quite early, and funnily enough, was never profitable. It was always owned by other companies who basically bought it and used it for their research and that's one reason why many SAAB cars had unusual and inventive features.
@jebise11262 жыл бұрын
3:46 what a splendid landing gear
@wkelly30532 жыл бұрын
Pretty elaborate aircraft for a first try, therefore leading to my wondering where they obtained the engineering expertise, and you answered my question. It looks a bit like a Vultee or Vought design. Great presentation.
@allangibson24082 жыл бұрын
ASJA (the aircraft department of the Swedish Railway Workshop) hired some American engineers in the mid 1930’s. ASJA got merged with other Swedish aviation interests to form SAAB… ASJA also built North American NA-16 trainers (the ancestor of the Texan) and Northrop 8A-1 (A-17) under license.
@dougstubbs96372 жыл бұрын
The prototype of the Ju87 was built in Sweden. They had a large aircraft industry by then.
@loveofmangos0012 жыл бұрын
@@dougstubbs9637 They also supplied Nazi Germany with Iron Ore throughout the war. Neutral country but pro Nazi indeed
@thor9232 жыл бұрын
@@loveofmangos001 not pro nazi
@LarS19632 жыл бұрын
@@loveofmangos001 And where else would they get coal from, with Germany occupying Denmark and Norway on one side and the Soviet Union at war with Finland on the other? Welcome to the real world.
@mirrorblue1002 жыл бұрын
Please do more Saab aircraft - thanks.
@Ontos_M502 жыл бұрын
I’m slowly watching all your videos during my lunch breaks at work these are the best
@christopherbentley72892 жыл бұрын
Always intriguing to see something about the WWII-vintage aircraft of 'other' countries, so thanks for this, Rex! I very often think that France is also certainly another one of those 'other' countries and occasionally Italy, too, strays into that 'other' territory. I wonder if it's anything to do with the excellent site by Sweden's Håkan Gustavsson on the last of the biplane aces in the earlier years of WWII ('Håkan's Aviation page') that makes Sweden so intriguing in this respect.
@Guru_Swami2 жыл бұрын
Love love love these videos! I have been introduced to so many unique and lesser known aircraft thanks to you. Thanks so much for taking the time to makes these!
@DaiElsan2 жыл бұрын
Another great video. How about looking into the Romanian airforce and planes.
@brendonbewersdorf9862 жыл бұрын
I support this idea the IAR 81 is an amazing plane
@RexsHangar2 жыл бұрын
Romanian planes are on my list :)
@valkyrie321 Жыл бұрын
Get ready for a boost in views. MSFS just released a B17A for their new world update.
@henriksamuelsson34662 жыл бұрын
As recently as last Friday, these ladders / platforms from production were useful at my workplace. 😎👌
@jimdavis83912 жыл бұрын
I noticed them myself; I am both a tradesman ans collector of older equipment...
@5peciesunkn0wn2 жыл бұрын
The Drakken is definitely one of the coolest looking delta (can it be called a delta wing airplane?) wing jets around. Good to see SAAB got off to a good start.
@903lew2 жыл бұрын
One “k” in Draken. But yes, a double or cracked delta.
@5peciesunkn0wn2 жыл бұрын
@@903lew aah. Thought I misspelled it but wasn't sure lol. Looks so much better than a full delta wing.
@calvingreene902 жыл бұрын
The question remains, why would any competent engineer go with a Delta wing when trying to design a fast but short field capable aircraft? It worked out real well and is arguably the best fighter jet of its generation but their was no way to predict that it would work out so well beforehand.
@dangerotterisrea2 жыл бұрын
One of the nicest looking production jets ever.
@blackroberts62902 жыл бұрын
dorito wing
@busterhymen62242 жыл бұрын
I love a good saab story.
@Verdunveteran2 жыл бұрын
Great to se you cover the SAAB B17! Cheers from Sweden!
@bruti562 жыл бұрын
I enjoy your channel very much. Thank you.
@Johnnyfandango12 жыл бұрын
Hey! It's the flying T Rex of war thunder fame! Great to see your now moving into aviation history.
@obsidianjane44132 жыл бұрын
Your videos make me miss playing WarThunder...
@mikepette44222 жыл бұрын
great choice ! swedish aviation has a fantastic history
@puppetguy8726 Жыл бұрын
A good and well-researched episode! But, the info that the wings could fall of while diving, I've never heard of that. So I did some research, found no such thing mentioned. I then proceeded to look up the individual history of each of the first 90(!) aircraft produced. There were no wing breakage, actually there wasn't any wing failure of any kind during their service life. I think you must have confused the B17 and the B16. The Caproni B16 was infamous in Swedish service, with some instances of wings coming off, which considering it wasn't at all built for dive bombing isn't all that surprising.
@jamesbugbee68122 жыл бұрын
Was attracted 2 this a/c by it's strangely misplaced American look, suspect the P&W engines might have had an influence, but now attribute this 2 the shortlived Yank design presence. Your rate & unique quality of production of these videos is amazing 💜.
@shawns07622 жыл бұрын
Thats a unique landing gear arraignment, like the P-40 but they didnt swivel 90 degrees. Saab's first fighter the J-22 also had a unique landing gear with the hinge points being in the fuselage (the smartest place to put them), this makes the aircraft significantly lighter, one of the reasons the Spitfire and the ME-109 were great. They had the best power to weight ratios throughout the war. The Spitfire ended the war with the best climb rate even though the 109k had a better power to weight ratio because it was under propellered.
@hfl7393 Жыл бұрын
SAAB didn't make the J22, FFVS made those...
@nacerkhamou31492 жыл бұрын
l love all your posts explicit and well detailed THANKS
@sproctor19582 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting Imperial numbers, for those of us still learning Metric.
@matthewlok30202 жыл бұрын
I love that landing gear fairing
@charlesstauffer98312 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else here think that this plane has a definite "Japanese" aircraft profile? Your doing a great job with this youtube channel!
@SunnyIlha2 жыл бұрын
That was a really good WW2 aircraft.
@Thehorrorboat2 жыл бұрын
Sweden would be unstoppable if it interfened in ww2 stronger than the nazis soviets czechs slovaks and even the americans
@douglasfur38082 жыл бұрын
What is that sign (~3:00) in the background "Farbjuden" about?
@johanakermyr14372 жыл бұрын
Rökning förbjuden = No smoking.
@TiredPhrog2 жыл бұрын
Finaly you cover some of our aircraft, noice
@zzhawker2 жыл бұрын
i've never heard much about Vickers Windsor, Thanks.
@jasonz77882 жыл бұрын
Thank you Rex
@benwilson61452 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@bradleyjanes29492 жыл бұрын
Hey rex,wow landing gear with"skirts", great vid👍👊
@neletg10 ай бұрын
Very good looking plane.
@angrydoggo22322 жыл бұрын
If you ever decide to make videos on jets, could you consider to make a video about the Javelin, as it’s my favorite plane ever
@rayven17492 жыл бұрын
Yeesss ! First and about my favourite aircraft company
@Daniel_cheems2 жыл бұрын
Very neat design
@deltavee22 жыл бұрын
Just for your information Rex, my right hand has developed a sort of Pavlov's Dog reflex in that when my eye scans across "Rex's Hangar" it clicks on the video without informing either my mind or body. The only other subscribe that gets that response is _Drachinifel._ Thanks for all your work and Cheers from E. Ontario, Canada, another land of moose and snow but sadly no aircraft industry, damit.
@michaeltelson97982 жыл бұрын
I would guess that the Italian engine was the Piaggio P. XI which was a licensed version of the Gnome-Rhone 14K/N. Sweden had purchased some 50 Regianne Re-2000 Falco that used this engine.
@fliegeroh2 жыл бұрын
I really like your videos.
@zxbzxbzxb12 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Saabs car adverts never indicated that they ever made any aircraft, oh wait... 🤭
@Knuck_Knucks2 жыл бұрын
After vowing to minimize my subscriptions. I just subscribed to your swell channel.
@IntrospectorGeneral2 жыл бұрын
It's interesting to compare this to the Douglas DB8a, designed by Jack Northrop, which entered Swedish service in 1938, licence-built by ASJA and, later, SAAB. While the SAAB B17 isn't a simple case of reverse engineering it seems likely that many lessons were drawn from the DB8a. It would be interesting to know if any of the 48 or so American engineers involved in development of the SAAB B17 had some connection with Northrop, Douglas, or the licence building arrangement for the DB8a.
@robertmyers52692 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking the same thing. See my other comment.
@madjack80282 жыл бұрын
According to Jane's Sweden was able to coax 1600bhp from the R1830. Can you look into that?
@WildBillCox132 жыл бұрын
A true SAAB story. Hope you'll do the J-21.
@Cadadadry2 жыл бұрын
Congrats for your very interesting work. Videos talking about WW2 era planes from neutral countries are uncommon AFAIK. Do you plan to focus on this category ?
@perttisalminen63572 жыл бұрын
Last summer (2021), only flyingworth example flyed in Helsinki Airshow, Finland.
@arno-luyendijk47982 жыл бұрын
Wow. Talking about a rugged airplane. Hats off for the Swedish.
@petergwp2 жыл бұрын
can you do J22 aswell? it's a wonderful aircraft and i'd like you to cover it up in this channel!
@shooter20552 жыл бұрын
Yep! The "other" B-17. 😁
@MrSatyre12 жыл бұрын
Wheeeeeeeeee! Next, do one on the Draken! 😁
@historybuilds2 жыл бұрын
the B17 from the swedish air force museum flies quite often over our house! tho wish they would repaire the B18 dive Bomber.. and fly it!
@yes_head2 жыл бұрын
Nice. And I'm not surprised American designers were brought in on this project. There's something positively Vultee-ish about that plane.
@pontuswendt24862 жыл бұрын
AMAZINGNES!!!
@Lord.Kiltridge2 жыл бұрын
I love the series. I would have liked to know how an aircraft of this type manages to use a bombsight though. I have looked at pictures and can't see a window that could be used for the purpose.
@stevusbeavus7202 жыл бұрын
That's a pretty trick idea with the landing gear covers
@karlbrundage74722 жыл бұрын
You have to wonder whether any of those US designers/engineers worked for Chance Vought. That empennage is almost a one-for-one copy of the OS2U Kingfisher.
@drstevenrey9 ай бұрын
The Italian engine you elegantly did not name was the Piaggio P.XI (11) RC.40D rated at 1000 hp, which was a license built version of the Gnome Rhone Mistral Major 14K. And Piaggio is pronounced Peeah-Joe.
@ja37d-342 жыл бұрын
Lovely.
@chadakoin12 жыл бұрын
One does wonder whether the wings detached before or after the bomb was released. The pilot would be presented with some interesting options.
@RexsHangar2 жыл бұрын
Experimental weight-shedding technology lol
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman Жыл бұрын
@RexsHangar >>> 👍👍
@patrickradcliffe38372 жыл бұрын
I would hazard a guess that the American designers were brought in from Chance Vought, they are more then few similarities to a Corsair.
@robertdragoff69092 жыл бұрын
We only know SAAB as maker of cars. But they also made military aircraft such as the 17 and later on The Draken … Be sure to do videos on other SAAB aircraft Good video
@FirstDagger2 жыл бұрын
Literally all Swedish made combat aircraft were made by Saab.
@EstorilEm2 жыл бұрын
No “we” don’t. 🤦♂️ They made a number of highly successful regional turboprop aircraft as well; 340 and 2000 specifically.
@robertdragoff69092 жыл бұрын
@@EstorilEm okay, so they made more than fighters, what other airplanes did they make and when did they start making cars? It’s a very interesting company
@FirstDagger2 жыл бұрын
@@robertdragoff6909 ; Wikipedia exists for a reason. Don't be so complacent.
@robertdragoff69092 жыл бұрын
@@FirstDagger just asking to start a conversation
@andrewlambert72462 жыл бұрын
Saab was built with german engineers. Saab also used German WW2 developments regarding earo dynamics on anomg other wing designs. This was smart. They didnt re-invent the wheel.
@shauny2285 Жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the Curtis SB2C.
@mathewkelly99682 жыл бұрын
Remained in service till 1969 with Eithopia
@robertmyers52692 жыл бұрын
Not to minimize the Swedish design team, but I'd be curious to learn more about the American engineers and their contributions. Aircraft companies at the time seemed to have a corporate design language for things like wing planform. I see a lot of Northrop/Douglas in this plane (SBD Dauntless), as well as some Vought -- the OS2U Kingfisher-like greenhouse and rudder.
@bigblue69172 жыл бұрын
Interesting aircraft. Looks a bit like the Brewster SB2A Buccaneer. Except for the odd looking undercarriage. They remind me of the waders worn by fishermen.
@MarktheRude2 жыл бұрын
It's such a shame that Saab the car-company went down under. Such an peculiar company with quite rather interesting cars. And planes!
@EstorilEm2 жыл бұрын
If they were any good, they wouldn’t have gone under. They were basically a bad version of 1990s Volvos lmao. Complex, unreliable, poor performance (even the Aeros) and priced as a “luxury” car. Plus good luck finding a dealership nearby… impossible to find parts and no mechanic wanted to touch them with a 10’ pole, had a ton of teething issues from major engine problems to rust and paint stuff. It’s not a shame that they went under lol, if you can’t compete and have a crap product, you’re not going to be successful.
@BlackMasterRoshi2 жыл бұрын
I think I love the design of this plane. I also love that they gave it an annoying name to confuse historians (unintentionally but still.)
@lordcommissareisenhart70392 жыл бұрын
Can you cover the polish air force I think it would be interesting given how in some ways the polish air force was very modern in some way and obsolite in other ways.
@POLMAZURKA2 жыл бұрын
nice looking ...except for the wheel arrangement.
@mikearmstrong84832 жыл бұрын
"Sweden being Sweden, home to moose and snow, the aircraft could also be equipped with retractable landing skis." Well, that's fine for the snow. But what about the moose? Was that the purpose of the wing mounted machine guns, or was there provision for a steel tube "moose cage" to fit around the nose and propellor?
@warhawk44942 жыл бұрын
I enjoy this plane in warthunder.
@kooperativekrohn8192 жыл бұрын
SAAB made some great cars from 80-2010 also
@kevineckelkampe2r2 жыл бұрын
They made great cars starting in the 40s....
@Tom-Lahaye2 жыл бұрын
A plane which looks a bit clunky on the ground but actually good in the air! Nohab being involved in aircraft building is a bit a surprise to me, as they were far more known from building locomotives, ships and heavy machinery.
@STEFANiSAKSSON2 жыл бұрын
Add to that: ASJ is far more known for building railway coaches (and locomotives)
@HumbugDandy2 жыл бұрын
Australian built Beaufort Mk VIII?
@adrianrutterford7622 жыл бұрын
Good Evening Everyone
@Sonjaslostson Жыл бұрын
Ah, my favorite light bomber in War Thunder
@tuttebelleke2 жыл бұрын
Can a Swedish person tell what was forbidden in the workshop, written on the wall at 3:05 ???
@swedmiroswedmiro13522 жыл бұрын
Smoking.
@tuftmeili2 жыл бұрын
partially obscured, but probably "rökning förbjuden", so it is a "no smoking" sign.
@tuttebelleke2 жыл бұрын
@@tuftmeili & @ Swedmiro Swedmiro: In those days a "No Smoking" message was there only for direct safety reasons, for if explosives or high flammable materials were present, not for health reasons. Or were the Swedish so progressive? This seems to be a mechanical workshop with no direct fire dangers?
@russkinter30002 жыл бұрын
I believe the Swedish airforce operated Northop A-17s before their own SAAB 17s
@stuew62 жыл бұрын
What about polish Airforce pzl 11c.
@bajuszpal1722 жыл бұрын
Dear authors, in my perception,there is an antagonism between power and abilities. PLease, aircraft are not politicians, they do serve longer and better. Paul, 67, retired teacher, amateur, historian.
@mikearmstrong84832 жыл бұрын
"And, Sweden being Sweden, home to moose and snow, the aircraft could also be equipped with retractable landing skis." How are landing skis supposed to help with landing on a moose? Wouldn't some sort of padded grappling claw be more appropriate? And how would they handle the G forces of such a sudden stop? And how would the moose handle it? Or was the moose considered expendable, on the premise that the moose population was greater than the expected number of landings? BTW, there are no moose in Sweden. The term "moose" is applied to the animal in North America. In Europe, the same animal is called "elk", because Europe does not have the large members of the deer family that Americans call the elk.
@danwe8782 жыл бұрын
Not correct about the moose.
@mikearmstrong84832 жыл бұрын
@@danwe878 How so? If you're going to say someone is wrong, then explain why or else it's just your own opinion.
@davidstobie27512 жыл бұрын
Avro Arrow?
@werre22 жыл бұрын
3:30 "rökning förbjuden" smoking verboten
@martijn95682 жыл бұрын
Interesting how both SAAB as well as FFVS (producing the J-22) had government origins.
@mgbman79802 жыл бұрын
What about the Hercules
@OrangesjesusАй бұрын
The same frantics, are happening now?.
@Dr.K.Wette_BE2 жыл бұрын
Those aircrafts where available for other countries, but delivered in parts with a notice to put it together. 🙄 (a missing screw could happen)