SYLLOGISM

This video is about Syllogism tricks for ssc and banking exam. Usually around 4 to 5 question comes during exams from Syllogism concept. In every aptitude Syllogism question comes in reasoning section and this is a very short and easy trick to solve Syllogism questions by using a Venn diagram.

[@khelnong5926]

Income should always be greater than expenditure...is the right sentence...man u just made me watch twice ..

[@Cosmos_grl]

Exactly..

[@khensorela312]

Yeah, I was confused as to what he was saying

[@ShubhamPatel-iu5ci]

😂

[@josephinabuffay9863]

Egjactlyyy😭😭

[@bandook5636]

Yeah bro i was like are u arts student😂

[@vaibhavpaithankar9008]

What a great a way to confuse the students ..hats off sir ...👏👏👏🔥

[@kuldeepthakur3528]

Right

[@hiya7669]

😂😂

[@varadavinay719]

I can't control myself 😂😂😂

[@milan_sehrawat]

Yup

[@priteshs]

Exactly !! 😭😬😂

[@divyabehata2455]

once you told income cannot be greater than exp and gain ur saying it should be greater than.clarify that part

[@balamira297]

he pronounced it in the wrong way .. it should income cannot be less than expenditure..

[@liveviar]

thank you

[@scrollersclips7046]

Mira Guru yes, but all over the videos is good

[@hitoswu5694]

Exactly what a fool to waste effort.

[@abhimanyusingh9919]

divya behata correct

[@natureloverany8868]

Nice trick of syllogs . Great idea to connect this topic with accounting part i.e. with income n expenditure. I just like the colorful idea But it is not considering perfect tricks for syllogisms for exm purpose.

[@sahillather4195]

in 2nd question one statement is +ve one is -ve then there should be -ve conclusion ....u are making confuse

[@satyamnishad8413]

You are teaching very easy questions which will not come in exams

[@manalikanjilal7482]

Right

[@captainaman656]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6Dap3ycZadlb6c ah dkh skde a tuc

[@abhishekvarshney7151]

I think firstly you need a class on syllogism then after you can deliver the lecture. You don't know anything about syllogism. Firstly attend a class for that then upload any video

[@mohitdeswal3491]

true

[@reddemon2183]

Hey Abhishek I think You don't know Anything About Syllogism.

[@mdshahbazahmed7123]

@@reddemon2183 u need to learn more about syllogism.

[@manojbilotia839]

Hm.. Maybe, that's why he got 1.2 million views.... #dumb

[@gowripriyabavanagari3325]

Restatement never follows in conclusion

[@surejreginald]

Last Q, option a is correct since option 4 (or d) is just same as statement a. You cannot have the same conclusion as any of the statement.

[@A1a8l5h9a8d]

It's almost 7 years to this still so useful, I wish I could go back then in time and relive all these years again having my present conciousness

[@Iamvengance191]

Have you clear your exam

[@amkai2928]

​@@Iamvengance191😂.

[@kajalgupta8432]

Thanks for this video. Your extra efforts made me understand the concept better. Even though you said a particular line wrong ' Income can never be greater than expenditure' I still understood the concept because you explained step wise step. Please pin a comment stating ' Expenditure can never be greater than Income '. Though we know loans and credit card are the sweetest poison which solve the problem just fine.

[@hritwikmukherjee7789]

From Morning I'm struggling with syllogism. But now it has become a cake walk. A warm thank you sir

[@rajeshanshsharma2682]

I know this because I was seeing you from outside

[@shahnaaz28]

This helped me a lot, I have solved almost all of my questions with this trick. Such an easy trick.

[@SicklesGamingBGMI]

Solve Full Chapter in Seconds .. Thanks alot sir ❤️

[@lolwele]

Very unique style of teaching 👏 on syllogism. Whole day i was trying to understand syllogism. But don't understand anything. It's a midnight finally found your video.

[@lasstarwellthongni9803]

I'm confuse you are saying income should not be greater than expenditure and then you are saying income can be greater than expenditure

[@ravindrapratap1942]

Income can be greater than expenditure.. But expenditure can't be greater than income.

[@lasstarwellthongni9803]

Ravindra Pratap thank u for assuring

[@shailarajane3756]

That is can't be ...not "can"

[@Adityasingh-px5pl]

Sir your are great ..since there is no video whole youtube channel ..who clear concept like this 👌 i Researching for 3 hr finally i got most easy video of this concept

[@vishalchoudhary6942]

When statement and conclusion are same then the conclusion will be wrong in tree and plant questions Conclusion 2nd

[@VinayKumar-yo5vo]

Shi baat hhh

[@Professor240.]

Sorry sir When statement are repeated as same in conclusion then it is taken as false. But according to ur last question ur accept as true Plz check it as soon as possible. Thank u

[@manjukhatri3221]

Yes I was thinking the same

[@azie-2862]

In the 2nd question by using ven diagram your answer and ven diagram answer is not same.

[@azie-2862]

All abishek are ash is the only wrong conclusion.. In my solution..

[@aslitadka7204]

3:10 its expediture can not be greater than income

[@venkatasaikishorereddyvuta4331]

Nice point

[@simple62543]

In 1st question you said income can't be greater than expenditure while in 2nd question you said expenditure can't be greater than income, why????

[@midhunrajr372]

what about the statement "some trees are not plants" how do we solve that type of question.

[@spsinghrajput317]

This is negative statement & For tree - 50 & for plant -100 Because trees attached witch some like statement & plant start with not like statement In conclusion we consider - ve statement 😊

[@sparshakash1013]

Groot was neva a plant... He was a born-tree ... So that's true 🙂

[@pritigupta1204_]

May be In this type of q. We can apply the value of some not 50, 100

[@soundaryachinnasamy]

@@pritigupta1204_ Yeahhh for Some...not statement we'll apply 50 and 100

[@PratikPattanaik-zr6ys]

@@spsinghrajput317 can u plz explain this with an example 🙏🏼

[@priyankadagar6091]

I have a doubt. In last question you said that "some trees are plants" is correct conclusion but when a statement repeats in conclusion then that conclusion is considered to be wrong. Please correct if otherwise. Thanks.

[@aaradhyakumari1899]

आप सही बोल रही हो

[@POOJASHARMA-kw2jg]

It would have been wrong if the statement written in conclusion as a possibility.. as that is a true not possibility..

[@warmachine0078]

Sir kabhi aap khe rhe ho income cannot be greater than expenditure or kabhi income can be greater than expenditure.

[@rajeshwarikonderi3764]

English problem😄, he is little bit confused.... Rule is - INCOME WILL BE GREATER THAN EXPENDITURE.

[@warmachine0078]

@@rajeshwarikonderi3764 😂😁 ok

[@PS-od2mm]

5 saal purana video mat dekho.

[@divanshugaming5754]

Yeah even he is making more confuse

[@divanshugaming5754]

Sir You are solving our confusing or making confuse more 🤨🤨🤨🤨

[@Nunhlima97]

Only work in some and all.What about the possibility case

[@kudavaleabhisheksingh4357]

1st question intelligent has different values which means no direct relationship of two statements,still u solved.in last question u solved in different manner.u learn and then taech

[@Manvi_MJ]

If any of the values is 100 then we can solve it.. As per your doubt, statement (a) has 50 as it's value on intelligent And statement (b) has 100 as it's value on intelligent Here, any one should be 100, and so it is. Or both as 100. That's how sum is solved.

[@kusum217]

Dear sir, statement is not conclusion... check the question tree , plant and herbs( option "b")

[@naveenmehra611]

That's also my question Statement can't be conclusion

[@kuldeepthakur3528]

Option "b" and option "d" aka "4"

[@vv9460]

What to do when there are 3 statements with 4 conclusions

[@captainaman656]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6Dap3ycZadlb6c u must see

[@equestbysurekha7256]

Venn diagram method is best and very easy

[@nehachoudhary5267]

Sir this rule is valid only for 2 statements...wat about three statements??

[@equestbysurekha7256]

Please do visit it may helpful kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnnTn36Fhaygn9U

[@shubhamtak5099]

This is an explanation for all those who are asking how to apply +ve -ve rule on problems with more than 2 statements: Let's say we have a problem with 3 statements. now firstly we check the 1st conclusion is valid or not. Now this 1st conclusion will be either negative or positive and it contains two elements. now this two elements are either from one statement or maximum two statements. now our first conclusion is say positive and two elements of it are from two different statements. Now we apply the +ve -ve rule on those two statements 1) if the outcome is positive then we can proceed further and check with income expense method. If the conclusion satisfys income expense method then it is valid . 2) if the outcome is negative then the conclusion is invalid even if it satisfys the income expense method(we assumed that the 1st conclusion is positive) . Apply the same procedure for all other conclusions.

[@durgabhavani5869]

Could please say in telugu if u know

[@Deagzzz]

@@durgabhavani5869 2 కంటే ఎక్కువ స్టేట్‌మెంట్‌లతో సమస్యలపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని ఎలా వర్తింపజేయాలి అని అడుగుతున్న వారందరికీ ఇది వివరణ: మనకు 3 స్టేట్‌మెంట్‌లతో సమస్య ఉందని అనుకుందాం. ఇప్పుడు మొదట మేము 1వ ముగింపు చెల్లుబాటులో ఉందో లేదో తనిఖీ చేస్తాము. ఇప్పుడు ఈ 1వ ముగింపు ప్రతికూలంగా లేదా సానుకూలంగా ఉంటుంది మరియు ఇది రెండు అంశాలను కలిగి ఉంటుంది. ఇప్పుడు ఈ రెండు అంశాలు ఒక స్టేట్‌మెంట్ లేదా గరిష్టంగా రెండు స్టేట్‌మెంట్‌ల నుండి ఉన్నాయి. ఇప్పుడు మా మొదటి ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా చెప్పబడింది మరియు దానిలోని రెండు అంశాలు రెండు వేర్వేరు ప్రకటనల నుండి వచ్చాయి. ఇప్పుడు మేము ఆ రెండు స్టేట్‌మెంట్‌లపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని వర్తింపజేస్తాము 1) ఫలితం సానుకూలంగా ఉంటే, మేము మరింత ముందుకు సాగవచ్చు మరియు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని తనిఖీ చేయవచ్చు. ముగింపు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినట్లయితే, అది చెల్లుబాటు అవుతుంది. 2) ఫలితం ప్రతికూలంగా ఉంటే, అది ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినప్పటికీ ముగింపు చెల్లదు (1వ ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా ఉందని మేము భావించాము) . అన్ని ఇతర ముగింపుల కోసం అదే విధానాన్ని వర్తించండి.

[@anzarali0886]

K lm gh

[@miccabullecer4342]

How to know if the statement is negative or positive?

[@ArihantJain2095]

Wow man. Thankyou so much. I would say that reading this comment was the best part in the entire video. Truly grateful 🙏

[@MadhuSingh-pd2sq]

In question no 2 (when 1 statment is negative and second statement is positive how will rule 1 is applied????

[@bhumiyadav7013]

This is what I needed all over youtube

[@krishnanandyadav6132]

In question no. 3 you say that there is no direct relation between two statement for conclusion no 3 but in question no 1 you didn't mention that

[@kanavsahgal]

Statement: " all managers are not graduates" In this case manager is value 100 what about graduates?

[@being__maniac]

It will be 100 and 100 as first word is all followed by Not

[@captainaman656]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6Dap3ycZadlb6c

[@saratkumar2009]

it is same as "no manager is graduate"

[@arunnegi92]

U can also write the above statement as " Some Mangers are not graduates" than u can give 50 to manager and 100 to Graduates

[@umerelegance9344]

But what about drawing conclusions how to draw them precisely from the statement

[@shrinivaspuranik3914]

In 4th example(viz. plants & herbs) u have used same statements as premises and as well as conclusions.Stmt-a=concln-d and stmt-b=concln-b. So there's no need to apply any rule to derive conclusions.

[@sanjaykumar-ei7by]

Can all questions get solved by 100-50 method or it has some limitations?? Please tell.. I cannot able to solve some questions by this method

[@SeemaSingh-oi6ry]

Sir, your trick is not apply in every question. Your trick is wrong 😃😃

[@alone_warrior0078]

What a technique

[@ankitakaushik5248]

no correct answer coming from ds method. something is missing.

[@amidevstudio7234]

u hv to learn these values..

[@GopalDas-ys3fs]

Amit sharma...what do u mean by learn this values. ..I am also facing the samr problem...

[@9927693115]

He is teaching wrong ...moreever he is saying sometimes income can not be more than expenditure it should be expenditure can not be more than income

[@Divyasinghbpojobs]

exactly broo... when statement or conclusion are both same ,, so conclusion is wrong but he said that is true ...

[@shivasharma4120]

Bhai tumhe na aane ka ye method ... ham is method se banate aaye hain aur ye best hai

[@joefanchun215]

Can this be applied in all questions? Had doubt🤨

[@curlncraft]

but isn't there any rule like "restatement is always false" ??

[@jakirjak1607]

soumi mitra hi...Do u know how to proceed with some not cases

[@curlncraft]

jakir jak very sorry... I'm very poor at syllogisms 😞😞😞

[@deepakk.s3481]

yes.. restatement is always false

[@nikplay77]

Conclusion b and d repeats. So it is false

[@skylark4994]

Restatement is always true 💯

[@pallavinale4939]

Second example main positive negative statement hain to answer negative hona chahiye na.??? Positive negative rule kab apply karenge

[@confusedme69]

Yeah I also have the same doubt In that example he is saying to watch only second statement But according to rules dono statement dekhne hai

[@PraDeepYaDav-ym8xe]

this method is totally tukka method totally fail in some aspects like in probability case and many more questions

[@shivasharma4120]

You are wrong ... this method is the best ... i have used it always andnit never failed ... better than venn diagram method jo possibility mein confuse ksrta hai ye nhi karta

[@prabu6466]

yeps bro totally fail.2 qctually questions first three statement correct 4th statement wrong

[@elocalwriter2724]

Check out My Tutorial on syllogism kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3XGaKdrq9uZr8k

[@priyammukherjee9725]

@@shivasharma4120 bhai syllogism ka sum kar dega?

[@SalK-3S3K]

R.PRABU SARAN i guess u are referring to Q 2 (Sal, Ash and Abishek). The first 3 conclusions are correct and 4th incorrect, per my review too-Sal and Abi are disjointed/have nothing in common so a & b are correct; Ash is part of Abi so c is correct & d is wrong.

[@NASEEMKHAN-xj4fl]

the rule is +ve -ve is negative but you gave the positive conclusion on the basis of second statement.

[@dhanrajjartarghar7242]

Hlo sir first of all I would like to thank you for helping us This is the easiest way to get the answer for 3 statement like all, some, no, but wat abt the 4 statement ie some not plz reply. I hope you will do the need ful

[@thalunkipgen4507]

Its been one year and he didnt reply your.....how was your exam, in syllogism part....

[@jeetkaur623]

Sir ap dobara bnao video ..this should be in trending.. koi nai smajta aise..students really need u......thnx so much

[@SandhyaSingh-fx4no]

U r saying "Income can never be greater than expenditure".

[@thalunkipgen4507]

That should be Income>expenditure... He said it wrong, but did it right

[@nishantgoel4423]

And still managed to get 1.4 million views

[@dd-gr7jg]

sir what about possibility questions?

[@sakshamkumar1183]

Best Lesson on Syllogism.. Thanks 😄

[@divyansh4278]

first time i have cleared syllogism from your video thnku very much

[@malikaamir6565]

what about either or conclusions

[@tachinsidisow1552]

Sir, the first part of example about Alia and the actor. There is total a confusion between income and expenditure rule. At first you said income cannot be greater than expenditure and secondly you said income is greater than expenditure. What is the main idea behind the rule. kindly clarify it ????

[@edisakradamanik1745]

I want to ask If there are 2 statements : All soldiers must be healthy Some soldiers are 70 kg weight What are the conclusions can you give for me? More than 1 of course

[@midhunrajr372]

some healthy are 70kg is trure. I think thats it

[@nvinydv7620]

I did 30 questions right now and only 2 of them is incorrect so maybe i did them incorrectly. So i go with this method. May be some of u didn't get his point properly. I do not know how to apply it in 3 statements so i left those ques. Apart from some of the mistakes he did in this video due to some hurry doesn't mean his method is wrong . Quite nice method i appreciate.👌

[@viyonajaat5457]

Ur teaching method is amazing Sir But joh last question m conclusion no (b) nd (d) wrong hoga bcoz conclusion m same statement given hota h toh voh wrong hota h 😊 For bank SSC Railway only:Repeat statement in conclusion is wrong

[@Sujeetkumarsaw7886]

Last wala wrong hai 100%

[@asbaZubair]

Jab ap ny bola na income greater wahi pta lg gya ap bht acha sekhay gy 👏

[@siddarthmahesh7528]

Confused moredan Rahul Gandhi in 2nd question he said statement a) _ve b)+ve he should apply rule num 2 according to coclusion 1 ) but he said apply rule num 3 😁😁

[@KuldeepKumar-bj8wz]

great explanation.... in one statement he is saying income can not be greater than expense and in other he says as income is less than expense so statement is wrong.

[@sumananumandla7661]

What if the statement is "only few Alia are intelligent" wat value should we take???

[@manishkumargautam4575]

This is such a great way to explain it! I'll have to remember this.

[@liveviar]

+Manish Kumar Gautam keep learning

[@AmanJha123]

+LIVE VIAR post some questions related with possibility case us me dikt aate hai

[@SatikSattaa]

@@liveviar first speak correctly what you are saying

[@namiboruah9830]

1st of all you should clear that Incexp

[@raxita9881]

Finally I understand syllogism 😚

[@waleedwt4008]

I have a Question… he says Income can’t be greater than Expenditure but does opposite to it 👀😐

[@rajeshwarikonderi3764]

@@waleedwt4008 yeah

[@PriyaGupta-uj5rd]

very genuine video about syllogisms,,,,, all concepts are clear in this video thank u so much sir for making this video

[@noahnoah5239]

this is the best explanation i have found since studying syllogisms - thank you

[@abhijitdas.7896]

Thank you very much sir🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 I tried this trick with too many questions with 99% accuracy. For you only a lots of time will be saved by now😇 Thanks once again😁😁🥰

[@rahulupadhyay7605]

Possibilty case me kaise apply hoga

[@parul5223]

No words for this trick Amazing video

[@BOOK_OF_SHORT_TRICKS]

what about being possibility problems and some red are yellow and yellow is green kind of sums ......make a video on that too

[@RahulKumar-ck3lq]

He must have love for Bollywood

[@liveviar]

haha

[@lawcommerce6710]

Rahul Kumar ass. Abhishek ki ho chuki

[@richajaiswal2205]

Sir, aapne 100 50 rule k vedio dekhaa ek query h...statements are. I- No man is a tiger. II-Karan is a man. Conclusions are I- Karan is not a tiger. II - All men are not Karen.-isme kaise kre?

[@tarunkumar9029]

It is my first time reading syllogism and I complete it in 9 minutes, crazy fast

[@rajenderthakur4465]

Sir if ...some flies are not bats then what about its coding ?

[@MasterOf-Destiny]

Everything about syllogism is here. Thanks for this amazing tutorial

[@V_Gyaan_01]

😂🙏🏼

[@Coolboysrm]

ALL LINE ARE GRAPH CONCLUSION 1- SOME PAGES ARE NOT GRAPH 2-SOME GRAPH ARE NOT PAGE Sir ISKA SOLUTION BATAO PLEASE 50 100 METHOD SE

[@rohitofficial678]

I think that you have taught wrong Because no salman is abhishekh and no abhishekh is salman will be right but you said that the statement is wrong Again clear it

[@phanimech7779]

Rohit kumar Saw totally this method is wrong bro pls dont follow this method most of the questions will get wrong

[@Mywaysoflife111]

I have a doubt kyoki sir jb statement or conclusion same h to wo restatements ka hota h or galat whi hota h to last waal m false hoga

[@abhishekarcsaberthakur2047]

Dont use it...its not applicable everywhere

[@05abhijith]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZ-pfZmJp5horbc watch this for all statements

[@rangaswamyb2765]

Super but which numbers we should take for "many"

[@warisasalim5902]

The best explanation till now I saw in syllogism ❤️

[@desionmynthlu1273]

😳😳😳😳 i don't understand because i used to solve with Venn

[@rohitsolanke7014]

I m confused in relation of income & expenditure..

[@captainaman656]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6Dap3ycZadlb6c🙄 u may see

[@dhrubapatgiri3986]

sir plz batai document vetifictn may provisional certfct hone se v ho jayenag kia ???ya phir original hona jaruri hai plz reply

[@akshayb513]

8:55 App galat ho sir. statement and conclusion same nai hona chahihe.

[@GAURAV81950]

You are correct. I also noticed the same thing.

[@sahadatraj7]

Sir syllogism me venn diagram kahan pr use kiya jata hai ?

[@priyabishnu1573]

u should draw a vann diagram. it's help in find out the deduction

[@sanjaykumarmohanta]

Sir , Statement and conclusion not equal. So how the last questions possible.

[@sipu737]

Thank you Sir, for the important lesson

[@narmeenpervaiz15]

Is this trick is only for two statement questions ??? Because its not working on 3 or 4 statements...

[@nishit_7777]

There can be alternative solutions to this problems―if we use the set arrangement method

[@Sagar-KumarIITPATNA]

Great

[@kaustavmahanta132]

clear your doubts 1st then make a video

[@Movie_Mania_4u]

Ya youre right

[@yesvenu12]

Excuse me i have a doubt if in the statement "only " Present how to take value

[@bhairavanarthu6194]

Hi very good class but I need some more examples with possiblility cases....

[@elocalwriter2724]

Check out My Tutorial on syllogism kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3XGaKdrq9uZr8k

[@greeshmarathod04]

how can proposition and conclusion be the same? (in the 3rd example)

[@dipankargogoi5840]

Ur explanation is so confusing

[@saratkumar2009]

hi @LIVEVIAR! Please see RS Aggarwal, he says conclusion must be negative, if there is one negative statement at least, so the 3rd one in video (some abhishek are ash) also not follows..just refer to it and explain

[@toijamkorouhanba4232]

What about "Some A are not B" statement rules?

[@ranafarooq375]

Plz tell how we can get either or option. Neither nor. There is a big confusion.

[@natrajanpallakgarg8696]

Good trick.. please explain why in question 3 conclusion c is wrong

[@shahzadi1202]

When you gave them values in first question you didn't told us about ash is 100 in 1st statement and 50 in 2nd statement. According to your rule there is no link in both these statements like third question. Why you followed 3rd rule only in 3rd question why not in 1st one

[@pattheitguy]

I know this video is 7yrs old, but I appreciate it.

[@saroshsbjc4164]

Please make a vdo on"if only either or " type Questions sir !!!