5g Challenge - Get To Orbit With Super Strong Gravity

[@theCodyReeder]

I've now spent 2 hours trying to get to orbit on 10g"s and I've only managed an altitude of 48km; and thats with a tiny probe core.

[@arimunic]

Hey its Cody! Big fan! Didn't know you where into ksp as well. You should do a little video.

[@theCodyReeder]

I've done a few KSP videos

[@arimunic]

+Cody'sLab Huh, I don't really remember then, and I've seen almost all your videos. Well I'd like to see you try to get to orbit at 10g.

[@theCodyReeder]

Here is a partial link to a quick video I made: v=UXIpEB8Xom0

[@scottmanley]

+Cody'sLab clearly we need more potent rocket fuel, maybe you have some chemistry tricks to teach the kerbals.

[@kubixus]

That's how ksp newbies feel when they try to make first orbit.

[@honeydew5022]

Kubissus yahhh

[@FictualKyle]

Kubissus can confirm

[@sankang9425]

Just blowing up for a Hour...

[@SpaceWalkerReal]

Kubissus yep

[@connorpurdom3812]

I got in to orbit first time and killed jeb on rentry he was obliterated and my second orbit forgot parachutes so I crashed into the VAB

[@RedsBoneStuff]

Highlights: 8:44 10:15 11:15 15:19 15:45 23:20 32:30 44:06 58:49

[@jameschubby3794]

thank you for this

[@jameschubby3794]

thank you for this

[@AKIPOPOPOPOOON]

W

[@RedsBoneStuff]

A

[@tomdude2929]

T

[@NessHX]

I like how he struggles to hit that revert flight button every time. Obviously he usually never needs it.

[@vimalgopal5873]

best quote of the video "we've picked up a bit of a shimmy. looks a bit suggestive if you ask me."

[@jonathanknightly9030]

he wasn't so subtle the next time "and we have no meat spin style wobblyness"

[@MattChaffe]

I love how at 11:15 the rocket bounces off the pad, and then wiggles its way up and falls over the clamps. A+ rocketry right there

[@itchylol742]

Successful launch at 52:43

[@captainlag3537]

thx

[@ryleighs9575]

Who plays or watches KSP to experience only success? I think you're missing out on a lot of the Fun!

[@CogTheBoss]

+R Stewart Ah, a fellow DF player

[@Daira929]

if the EM Drive works, I file a bug report to God

[@jetison333]

@@carteradams43 I thought it didn't work? I might just have future information

[@carteradams43]

@@jetison333 i did not know very much information

[@carteradams43]

@@jetison333 removed comment

[@mikepowell8611]

Its feature not a bug!

[@wolfy1398]

@@mikepowell8611 it just works

[@vimalgopal5873]

I have no idea why I like watching these Scott Manley videos, but I do. I could be watching a Spielberg film, or Game of Thrones, but no, I choose to watch Scott Manley.

[@MrHappygolfer]

You say your shoulder is "cold." Get it checked out NOW. My friend had a similar malady and it turned out to be cancer. btw, I really enjoy your videos. I hope to share them with many kids in the future.

[@JustAGiraffe]

I always like watching Scott's streams because when he makes mistakes on stream he can't edit them out so I feel better about myself for being so incompetent at ksp

[@chickenpermission]

*opens door* I just wanted to let you know that we're all counting on you. *closes door*

[@MrNight-dg1ug]

Chicken Permission xD

[@trackeraerospace]

What’s that from now again?

[@TinyFoxTom]

@@trackeraerospace Leslie Nelson in Airplane!

[@alexsiemers7898]

In 1.2, hack gravity does apply on all planets as a multiplier. So when Kerbin has 10g, Eve has 17g, Mum has 1.66g, Duna 3g, etc.

[@alexsiemers7898]

Mun*

[@salazarnecktwister9112]

your mum is so fat that she has a gravitational pull of 1.6 g's

[@nivshaham5962]

lol

[@staffy35]

I remember one time, just for fun, I tried to bring jebadiah back to the surface alive by himself from a space station I made. I don't know how, but, he survived... he made a giant bounce, it was so funny!

[@General12th]

Never say "meatspin" again, Scot...

[@loganbrooke2914]

Seriously, "meatspin style wobbliness" was never something I expected to hear

[@babygorilla4233]

i have a somewhat strange thing i would like to see, i would like to see an option for struts where you can set it so those struts don't break on decouple that way if some parts are strutted together and dropped they stay together

[@cool123guy5]

Thatd be useful for tilt and sweeping wings

[@alb8677]

Damn, sad I missed seeing this live. I know what I'm doing for the next hour though!

[@windjammer3950]

i always miss the live ones

[@Yonkage]

This is like gravity training for Kerbals. If you get can to orbit under 400x gravity, your rocket will turn Super Saiyan!

[@willrandship]

Scott, here's my prediction on *how* the conservation of momentum would be conserved if the QVVP properly explains the EmDrive. I'm not saying that it does, or even that the drive works at all, but this is the way I would think it works. *IF* the Quantum Vacuum Virtual Plasma (QVVP for short) exists and can be acted upon, it has some equilibrium state it exists in. From what I understand, the basic concept is that this plasma constantly creates and destroys matter-antimatter particle pairs everywhere. If you could push on it, you would move those pairs, and change the momentum of the photons they generate on their destruction. If you move both particles in the same direction (unlikely, as they would be opposite charges) then you gain the momentum they change by, and you "emit" corresponding photons in the other direction when they self-annihilate. This would make the EmDrive simply a substantially better radiation pressure engine. If you move them in opposite directions, then you must absorb one into the engine, and gain the momentum transfer of the other. In this case, you gain the momentum transfer of the one, but consume a small mass of your engine as well. This would mean EmDrives are subject to the dV equation, based on how long they can remain operational before needing to be replaced. This would make the EmDrive comparable to an ion engine, except that it ablates away parts of itself instead of a gas. Either of those might explain why it works without violating Newtonian physics, while still leaving us with a working engine.

[@Probeshorts]

"Meatspin" reference ftw

[@schevenjohn]

i was looking for this comment :-D

[@SPACKlick]

52:30 "we're going to fix this" totally forgets the monopropellant that he mentioned minutes before. Wah wah wah!

[@mykhayloslobodyan1250]

Beer, and insufficient beer training.

[@finalfanvi]

I know this is an old video, but maybe you'll see this, Mr. Manley. Your challenge was a fun one, and you did a better job than I did at flying into orbit even with me copying your design (one or two small changes that may have been either positive or negative), but it seems to me that the one thing you did wrong was give up too easily on bringing Jeb safely back to Kerbin. You were very close on one of your three-parachute attempts, so I figured it would be doable if you lost just a little more weight. First, the monopropellant, obviously. Second, the side chutes-even in 5G the tiny little starter pod is likely to survive with only the nose chute, and one chute that opens is better than three that can't open. Plus it's probably almost as aerodynamic as the cone you used! :P Lastly, jettison the heat shield once you're at a safe speed. This worked on my first try: although it hit the water at probably over 13 m/s, it survived. On a retry I would set the fully open altitude higher. Also, I don't know if the updates in between this video and now would have changed the outcome. You're better at this than I could possibly be, but I think you missed a trick on this one. Maybe you weren't really trying. Ironically, when I finally made it to orbit, my path was much more circular than yours, just because I had to nurse it into orbit by firing the last two stages at 45 degrees while going from 110km to 90km apo. I think you were perhaps too conservative on the other side because you were consistently running dry on your last stage before even REACHING apoapsis!

[@miraak542]

Kerbalish Translation 101 It worked! - Mmmhmmhmhm! (Not used often) This was a very bad idea...- Mmmhmmhmhm! What am I doing in this crazy thing?? -Mmmhmmhmhm?? I'm gonna die... - Mmmhmmhmhm... This was a great idea! - [No translation. Not in Kerbal Vocabulary]

[@jcoxeye9200]

Technically, Kerbals speak reverse Spanish, so it would be; It worked! - !ónoicnuF¡ This was a very bad idea... - … aedi alam yum anu euf atsE What am I doing in this crazy thing?? - ?arucol atse ne odneicah yotse éuQ¿ I'm gonna die... - …rirom a yov eM This was a great idea! - !aedi narg anu euf atsE¡ (I translated this with google translate, so it's probably wrong in some way.)

[@carteradams43]

more! why am i flying into the sun/out of the solar system?-Mmmhmmmmh? great, now how do i get BACK to kerbin?-Mhmm, MhmmhmmMHMMmhmhmm? why is danny here?-Mhmmhm? what the heck, human! this does not even look like a rocket!-Mhmhmm, Mhumm! Mhememmmhmmmm! i didn't sign up for this!-Mhmmmehm! you will survive!-Mhmmhmmm! (common lie told to astronauts)

[@christopherreed2694]

the gravity falls off dude thank you I always have been staring at leaving earth never got that part that was cool man .raw

[@gl-cn6xg]

I love your videos Scott! I live and work in San Jose, California but moonlight as an armchair astronaut (kerbal-naut to say). Keep making great kerbal videos.

[@Falke615]

Scott: Watching you get tipsy and blowing up rockets made my workday! Thank you!

[@ilokivi]

Wondering if a space elevator based on Arthur C Clarke's idea would stand a better chance of getting a craft into a stable orbit. Ground based launches appear to be very expensive and risky given a 5g force applied.

[@Krebzonide]

one time i took like 20 kerbals to space then put the ship in orbit then made it so that the periapsis was 5km then i made all the kerbals jump out of the ship and like 4 survived. you should test it and find the actual probability of surviving.

[@okuno54]

Dammit, Scot! I was drinking when you started with the "Star Wars" song >.

[@DaniPaunov]

23:50 JETTISON THE DAMN HEATSHIELD

[@DJ.Sylveon]

Btw on the topic of beers. An interesting beer I've had is a Funky Buddha French Toast. It seriously tastes like french toast dipped in maple syrup.

[@johannesdolch]

16:58 Exactly at this point a billion faithful viewer are shouting at their screens... "OMG, CAN'T YOU SEE THE BOOSTERS ARE OFF CENTER?! Oh, how you frustrate me, Scott Manley!"

[@Dr.Cosmar]

I just started playing KSP. I know a tip you don/t know...shocked myself. Just from trial and error, I learned something very valuable. Idk, probably assuming to much with that statement. 33:12 Use tailfins or deluxe winglets instead of static tail fins. Make sure there is a 4 way near the front, the 4 way is strictly pitched and it needs to be lined up with the cardinal directions on the landing pad (sounds strange, but go ahead and rotate it 45 degrees, see what happens. You might already know though. Winglets on the tail can be used for roll, but I don't think we ever really need it. Least, I'm not smart enough to come up with a decent reason to roll a rocket faster than it rolls normally. Mind your authority, it changes depending on the elevation. I was able to steer a 18-20 ton vessel with 2 thumpers. Took a lot of trial and error, but I can turn 10 degrees on command (like, just 400 feet and 50 m/s of thrust I can inch over about 2$ with one keystroke at a time. It reaches I think 116 km Apoapsisif I remember correctly. Also worth noting it has a single swivel engine center of the craft for stability (no RCS yet, only Tier 2 or 3 Tech tree atm lol). I still suck at the game...so orbit is eh... I prefer to utilize Aerodynamics when building rockets...probably why my rockets take 7+ hours to actually get somewhere (usually lost...cause again, I suck.) I somehow stuck someone in permanent orbit around the sun at 9k m/s. Perfect orbit...no exit in sight. Right in between Kerbal, and the next planet inwards. I know it scales too, you just have to line it up to the stage by stage starting with the last to first if you go for a big vehicle..then adjust angles, adjust authorities, lots of trial and error. I can make a super inefficient vehicle turn, never mind that I can't get it to leave the atmosphere, it turns! Seeing you struggle with this makes me want to attempt it...I'm pretty good at getting out of orbit if it's the goal, not so good at doing ANYTHING else. I was today years old when I discovered that the multi-directional drag tool on maneuvers in the map...yeah, you can drag that other was then out and into the corresponding shape (no idea what the purples ones or blue ones are still, figure I'll deal with it when I need to know.) 36:08 - Nah, you can and should turn right off the pad, you need wings. Just, not a complete horizon turn...

[@cruiserflyer]

At 52:25 "One glorious moment of thrusting" Sounds like a great T-shirt or the name of my new band. Thanks for that one Scott!

[@peardude8979]

Also sounds like a sex joke.

[@StrydarXtheXGrim]

"Thar be the struts that will save us" Does anyone know the kerbal(kerballi?) translation for famous last words?

[@samk108]

sasomaf sarbalap samitlú

[@galvanizeddreamer2051]

"áravlas son euq selatnup sol res on." Should be it.

[@MrNight-dg1ug]

Sam K your missing the K: "Samouk baik jebadiah K"

[@willanderson4224]

UZI

[@snowjix]

AK 47

[@martinhill7304]

Trying a landing in spacesuit with your rocket pack? "It's a completely different type of flying, all together"

[@georgelionon9050]

The EM drive is bullocks. Even the meassurements that claim it, it was just at the edge of the ability to meassure, typically where small errors produce false results. Then the "vacuum" was bullocks it was tested in, so likely it was just an evaporation effect of the condensators. Nobody was able to recreate it. Its "cold fusion" all along (if somebody remembers a similar hoaks from the 1990s) Only one guy being able to "meassure" it, not able to explain it, and no one ever redo it... but everyone was crazy for it, since it would mean a lot if possible... but nope.

[@carteradams43]

well apparently it worked

[@Monkeyb00y]

I was watching this while I'm making polymer clay necklace of the planets for mother's day :) Thanks for the lovely content :)

[@mwbgaming28]

Whenever I play this game, I find myself narrating it with your voice XD

[@LordWaldema]

Plan A: Get stuff into orbit Plan B: Let's see how fast we can hit the water

[@TheRobo]

Scott! You should take a look at the new Autostrut feature under the advanced tweakables for KSP 1.2! A lot of people, including myself, had zero idea about this, and it essentially removes the need for KJR.. And even works with assembling massive space stations without it turning into a wet noodle when moving it!

[@scottmanley]

+The_Robo yep, I have see it later in the video.

[@trackeraerospace]

2 years later and stations still wobble like wet noodles.... you have to turn off all reaction wheels except the one closest to the center of gravity

[@trackeraerospace]

I know it’s been 2 years since this video Scott, but it is still pretty great

[@davekorbiger]

In general I would prefer to watch the live stream, BUT I am too from Germany consequently the live stream starts really early in the morning... Like REALLY really early in the morning xD Well at least that way you're getting some more watch time on yt :) Great video :D

[@bal20]

You have far too much fun mr Manley! haha

[@autolykos9822]

@ 10:35 - It is also a "normal" rocket, in the sense that it points perpendicular to the surface of Kerbin :P

[@crazyfakar1]

Yes, I agree when you say, "We should make this a crude mission." As crude as you can get without getting demonetized.

[@alithegeek]

“We’re picking up a bit of a shimmy. It looks rather suggestive if you ask me” LMAO

[@oopoo64]

Meatspin style wobbliness, Scott is a veteran of the Internet.

[@calvinsasse5882]

on the electrical charge problem, In career and science, I just find the vector and point at it, and turn off SAS, then roll for about a second. It works, too!

[@richfiles]

What got into you to cause you to sing? Knowing how these streams go, probably a tasty cold beverage! :D

[@unfa00]

This video is great fun - thank you!

[@HammerspaceCreature]

I finally found out who let the dogs out. Thanks Scott.

[@caijones156]

Scott it is not possible to brake the laws of physics, but it is possible to re-write laws and create new laws.

[@K3rbalSpace]

physics has its own rules for brakes,

[@crabgnome5388]

We're space pirates! Hang the laws! They're more of a set of guidelines anyway...

[@MrScaryowl]

+Solid Banana but why are there solid bananas around my anus

[@alexeyvlasenko6622]

I think that's pretty much the point. If something actually "breaks" the real laws of physics, that's just another way of saying it does not and cannot exist.

[@gagrin1565]

Or you messed up your measurements.

[@marsh2202]

I love all the Airplane! references.

[@Etheoma]

AIR BRAKES!!! GOD DAMIT. You could have used air brakes to slow your decent so you could deploy the chutes.

[@skavies2351]

drogue chutes would probably work as well.

[@Etheoma]

Michael Grondahl Na they will break as well.

[@skavies2351]

I don't think so, because at one point his parachutes went orange, and drag chutes will go white while the parachutes are red, so I think it can be done and it will weigh significantly less than air brakes. I have not tried this test version, but with seeing the parachutes go orange for a few seconds, there is a small window of time to deploy a drag chute to slow it down enough for a few parachutes. I do not know if the gravity will auto rip them, but maybe using 3 of each chute...

[@klesk4never]

Yup. Drag chutes can be opened at higher speeds and will bleed enough speed so you can open your "main" chutes. I usually stage drag chutes than main chutes for high speed landings.

[@givemebackmyhamster6392]

That’s bigger than the rocket I used to try to get to the mun

[@toomdog]

That time Scott said he would stop singing and then continued singing through the entire stream

[@BigHappysPlace]

small beer and it's not lasting very long.. Sounds like a drinking problem to me. :P ;)

[@thetrollmaster3]

The problem is that the beers is too small :)

[@BigHappysPlace]

JK-Gaming thus the drinking problem. :D

[@xxkq0]

Hardly a problem now is it

[@BigHappysPlace]

xinxian kongqi Short stack beer is a problem. :D

[@ninboy01]

It a problem with the only solution being to get more beer.

[@xenowreborn]

Also great Job.You truly are amazing

[@vinzent1992]

48:30 The "EM drive" is a magic propulsion mechanism which works only on a flat earth and which can take you to superluminal velocities. It is not at all the same as blowing your own sail.

[@moore9793]

It's absolutely the same as blowing your own sail. It's attempting to use internally reflected microwaves to generate thrust.

[@DataDownLynk]

That was one hell of a shimmy... Poor Poor Watney... Better luck with the Taiyang Shen then

[@WritingMyOwnElegy]

'lifting off with all the speed of continental drift' im using that

[@tedwardfox]

Love all the "Airplane" quotes.

[@gregorygan1464]

Life hack: circularise your orbit without burning Δv by altering the planet’s gravity.

[@jasonplant5432]

I paused this until my beer was cold. That way I can enjoy it better

[@AgentPepsi1]

I am concerned about the safety of the Kerbals in your spacecraft ;) You should drink beer more often when making the videos. I tend to have a glass or two of red wine when I play (and come up with the craziest ideas :D )

[@MatthewSuffidy]

The way I figured it out is that when you use more than one thruster, you will never accelerate faster than any one of them alone, but with a payload, the payload starts to seemingly disappear with more thrusters. If you could not get any of the rockets off the pad by itself, more of them would just do the same.

[@doodlefox9837]

for long floppy rockets I usually add a second command module at the bottom and control the rocket from there. That makes the SAS correct the steering.. correctly :P

[@alexeyvlasenko6622]

Along similar lines, I wonder if a "Jool sample return" mission would be feasible? Make some sort of aircraft that is basically a huge pile of giant rockets, fly it deep into Jool's atmosphere (say, at least to the 14-bar level), and then somehow fly a capsule back out and return to Kerbin. No idea if this is possible with stock parts, I would suspect not, but if one can get into orbit with 5g, maybe it's not out of the question? Of course, the problem with Jool is not just the escape velocity, but also the atmosphere.

[@gaalidas4836]

Love all the launch attempts. Not too keen on the asparagus stuff but it seems to work in this case.

[@miserychickadee]

What's wrong with asparagus staging? Is it just the lack of realism?

[@AGKfan64]

I can still use asparagus staging as long as the environment doesn't include atmosphere. The problem is asparagus staging adds more drag and reduces the initial TWR of any stage which means more delta-V lost due to overcorrective steering and gravity.

[@samsonguy10k]

Asparagus isn't unrealistic, it's just not as efficient in a realistic setting, and does present more drag in the game now.

[@HALLish-bl3bm]

+samsonguy10k It's unrealistic because IRL fuel has momentum, and the more extreme versions would rip the craft apart with fuel flow.

[@Xandros999]

52:30 Disappointed that Hall of the Mountain King didn't take off.

[@jonaslidstrom7006]

I'm almost halfway through the vid and I realize that it looks like you are building some sort of high G ICBM

[@tordjarv3802]

If the EM Drive works, as it is claimed it should work, momentum is not a conserved quantity. There is a really important theorem, Noether's theorem, that states that for every continuous symmetry of the action (an action is an object that encodes the laws of physics, it is commonly used in Lagrangian mechanics, quantum field theory, string theory and other) of a physical theory there exists a conserved quantity. The symmetry related to the conservation of momentum is the symmetry under translations, that is the laws of physics does not depend on where you are and stays the same through out the universe. If momentum is not a conserved, as the EM Drive would imply if it works, it would mean that the laws of physics are not the same through out the universe which would be an amazing and terrifying discovery. To this day every deep space study seems to indicate that the laws of physics are the same through out the visible universe, therefore any breaking of translation symmetry must be extremely small and the breaking of momentum conservation must be very small. So if the EM-Drive actually works it must be very weak because otherwise we would have had observed breaking of momentum conservation and that the laws of physics are not the same here as they are in other parts of the visible universe (for instance the emission spectrum of distant gas clouds would contain chemical elements completely alien to us).

[@jonathanknightly9030]

long time watcher, first time comment. i dont know what to say except MEAT SPIN hahaha couldnt believe it

[@sansthepungeonmaster5864]

You can use a lander can and two inflatable heat shields on both ends to generate ridiculous amounts of body lift. also sepatrons, that's what you need

[@FabianZirklerMusic]

Love your livestream-videos... what about an "eeloo or bust" for a future one?

[@sawmorebuttz]

love the airplane! references

[@colonelgraff9198]

Marty McFly: Whoa. This is heavy. Dr. Emmett Brown: There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?

[@KSPAtlas]

I got this reccomened because "5G" is a trending topic

[@scottmanley]

Guess I need to remember to make a 6G video when that starts tending.

[@backwoodsjunkie08]

Lol same here!

[@Zalian]

With so much focus on explosions, it appears that Mr.Manley has forgotten to prime his engines before dropping clamps. Or check staging haha

[@anumeon]

Ladies and gentlemen. Behold the Kerbal space program version of the North Korean "Long distance" rockets.. :)

[@Xandros999]

Their rockets can't get off the ground because of Glorious Leader's animal magnetism.

[@itsraventm]

57:09 proof that scott is immortal; he drinks nothing because he doesnt have to drink

[@indyracingnut]

Guarantee you NASA is taking notes from Scott's screwups on this game so they can make their rockets even better.

[@Myuutsuu85]

8:31 My suggestion would have been to use Sepratron I's, but after recreating this scenario 1 to 1 , i noticed that the seperated booster still colide with the main rocket, taking out the engine. Hmm.. maybe more Sepratron's.

[@GlassMenagerieTF]

He nailed the atmosphere at like Mark 13... which is pretty fast obviously...

[@nerys71]

if it works (em engine) then it does not violate any laws. either our laws are simply incorrect or we do not understand what it is doing. but it is not violating the laws of physics.

[@ghostlyninja125]

no shit

[@CrushOfSiel]

Yeah, IF. I think all knew that though.

[@HALLish-bl3bm]

The laws of physics can't be violated by definition.

[@SynchronizorVideos]

There was no lesson taught by that, because no-one of any authority ever claimed that bumblebees shouldn't be able to fly.

[@obloquious]

HALL9000ish There's the laws of physics, and then there's our understanding of what the laws of physics are. These two things don't always match up.

[@jackmattciz]

You should see how fast you can re-enter at!

[@scriblestingray5713]

this is what it feels like to play ksp for the first time.

[@s6th795]

What is this "aqualox" he's talking about at 54:07? Obviously, an RF thruster resembling the EM drive, but I can't find anything by that name because I don't know how it's spelled.

[@MarcusHelius]

Scott do you know you can jettison the heat shield to shed weight on landing, it actually slows down faster than the pod when jettisoned, but is just dead weight when dropping through the lower atmosphere...

[@km5405]

that heat thing is true tbh, I once sent a probe to jool and hit the upper atmosphere at 23km/s like a brick wall: it exploded instantly!

[@Gustav_Kuriga]

I think part of the issue was you released the clamps as you turned on the engines, meaning the rocket not only had to overcome its initial inertia, but also the downward motion as well.

[@bippityboppityboo552]

my mom like watching these videos with me but she always gets mad that there are 2 moons lol. Shes funny when she's not mad at me.

[@ryleighs9575]

Your mom sounds like a cool person.

[@General12th]

...can I ask why she's so mad there are two moons?

[@igelitovysacek6307]

2 moons make her mad? i guess she doesnt know about jupiter.

[@bippityboppityboo552]

She believes it produces an inaccurate representation of our solar system and kids might get confused because of the discrepancy compared to the real earth-moon model that we are all so familiar with.

[@Will-wi7hv]

Hey Scott! Your my fav KZbinr! Quick question, how do you stay interested In KSP all the time?

[@rywulf]

15:33 died laughing. that ship looks hilarious when its launching

[@johnrtrucker]

"Houston, my space craft is doing a meat spin... Houston: what's a meat spin? Pull up your ground camera and zoom in... *horrified laughter ensues*

[@Luka_3D]

Hey, Scott! I made a mod that scales Kerbin to 4 times its scale and gives the planets a similar inclination to that of the Earth. Could you take a look at it? It would probably be great for your next 100 % or almost 100 % stock series because it would give the game some more difficulty that you probably need, cause you are an experienced player. The mod is called "4x solar system".

[@Cnupoc]

just a LITTLE more thrust :D Scott, use sepatrons for boosters. How do you even use boosters without sepatrons? That's madness :D

[@scottmanley]

I'm trying to save on mass, and if you look at the speed/drag then I'm pretty sure they simply don't have enough thrust.

[@Cnupoc]

ye i was joking about the thrust :D you just kept saying JUST A LITTLE a lot through the video and then adding more and more huge boosters :D Yes the mass and g force are huge.. twas just a joke :P but i do think sepatrons would help with the boosters :P

[@IsaiahClemmons]

oh shit i didnt know you could use that tool to do that. That makes things so much easier!

[@jarod2833]

42:36 Behold engineers, you've found your god