There's the old saying "Anything that is not nailed down is mine; anything that can be pried loose is by definition not nailed down". Now there's "Anything that is not bolted down is flight-capable; anything that can work itself loose from its clamps is by definition not bolted down".
@richardunruh4035Ай бұрын
We now have the answer to the question: "why do we need a flight termination system for a static test?"
@gdutfulkbhh7537Ай бұрын
When your hold-down clamps are made in China...
@PixalEaterАй бұрын
😂 harsh @@gdutfulkbhh7537
@richardunruh4035Ай бұрын
@@gdutfulkbhh7537 LOL, well said...but I don't think you need to limit it to just the hold-down clamps.
@ThatOpalGuyАй бұрын
@@gdutfulkbhh7537 its just a very capable first stage.
@alexyoung6418Ай бұрын
Platform whispers to the rocket shortly before the test:"Which one of us is the testee again?"
@RyanHoovermikebegoodyoАй бұрын
Glad to hear a comment on the Chandra X-Ray Observatory. It would be a true shame to have a functioning space telescope canceled because of budget issues and not actual hardware issues.
@doxielain2231Ай бұрын
I mean, that's what happened to the entire US space program for the last 40 years.
@Grey0730Ай бұрын
They’re also discontinuing VIPER for the same reasons
@radekc5325Ай бұрын
OK I spit my drink at the "first word problem". Nicely done.
@TJ-WАй бұрын
🤦♂️
@timmcdaniel6193Ай бұрын
I went "OW OW OW" for about 20 seconds. -- The bit starts at 9:10.
@sndsiwriteАй бұрын
Weird Al has it covered. A medley of First World Problems and Word Crimes😂😂😂
@TheMarcusGomezАй бұрын
2nd staging is hard.
@MisterItchyАй бұрын
That was delivered so dryly, I thought I misheard him!
@botondkis9624Ай бұрын
We have seen the Ariane 6 APU failture from Győr, Hungary. We were at the Hungarian Asztronautical Scosiety's Space Camp. We were watching the stars that night. It looked amazing!
@beenaplumber8379Ай бұрын
It was a spectacular launch! I'm still happy for Ariane & ESA, even though it's so disappointing they couldn't relight the APU. That's an awesome rocket!
@cotabomАй бұрын
Oh my god.. Oh my god I can't believe my eyes. I used to watch your old KSP videos all the time and now you appeared in my recommended feed after.. god.. what 8 or 9 years now?? I'm really happy to see you're doing well!!
@NeonVisualАй бұрын
Funny how even after thousands and thousands of years, humans still look at caves and think "home".
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
I mean, it's a natural place with a roof, good enough I'd say
@NeonVisualАй бұрын
@@davisdf3064 But there might be a space bear in there.
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
@@NeonVisual That is true
@symmetricat188Ай бұрын
We like it cozy.
@saumyacow4435Ай бұрын
@@davisdf3064 An unstable and dangerous roof
@joyl7842Ай бұрын
great to hear they said don't shut down Chandra!
@owensmith7530Ай бұрын
Absolutely.
@paulcarpenter999Ай бұрын
I remember previous instances when there seemed to be clusters of unrelated launch failures, the first half of 1986 comes to mind, and there was a similar period in the late 90's.
@KaiHenningsenАй бұрын
Also that first big SpaceX failure (was that AMOS?), there was the explosion of that transporter (I forget the name), and didn't Sojus also have a mishap around that time? Or was that when SpaceX lost that docking adapter? Three launch providers for ISS, three failures. That was ... _interesting._
@DEADB33FАй бұрын
"Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action." --- Ian Fleming
@weppwebb2885Ай бұрын
@@DEADB33Fwho would be the enemy of space? :O
@philb5593Ай бұрын
@@KaiHenningsen Amos-6 was the second big F9. It was the CRS-7 in-flight failure you are thinking about. Antares had a failure launching Cygnus in Oct 2014, Progress had a failure in April 2015, and Dragon CRS-7 failure was in June 2015. 3 resupply mission failures in a row.
@flaviosalatino8192Ай бұрын
@@philb5593Yeap, the ISS was close to be evaquated because they where almost out of supplies
@S1nwarАй бұрын
4:20 what a crazy trackingshot
@HasanProdАй бұрын
its post processed
@MonkeyJedi99Ай бұрын
Another difference between rockets and ICBMs that contribute to price is that a rocket needs to be in a sound state or launch through a short period of time, while an ICBM needs to sit ready and in mechanically sound condition for decades (honestly in the hope it NEVER launches).
@taras3702Ай бұрын
Retired ICBM'S are converted to launch satellites too. The Titan ICBM's were very successful in that role after retirement.
@krisk7Ай бұрын
You forgot to mention on Jul 3rd Poland went into space using Bursztyn (Amber) rocket launched from Norway and reached 100+ km altitude.
@_TeXoN_Ай бұрын
Do Rockets that someone else launched from Poland to above 100km also count, because Germany did this in 1942.
@MinedMakerАй бұрын
Poland can into space!
@stupidapeАй бұрын
Lesgoooo
@donjones4719Ай бұрын
@@_TeXoN_ I like your sense of humor. But I have questions. Germany's 1942 launch of an A4 (later V2) went beyond the US definition of space, 80 km, when it hit 85 km. It was also beyond the German definition at that time, they celebrated going into space (Wikipedia). A 1944 launch went well above 100 km, to ~180 km. But both launched from Peenemunde in Germany. V2 test launches were being made from Poland from late 1943 after Germany shifted a lot of V2 stuff to Poland to escape Allied aerial bombing. So one could have reached one of the altitudes I mentioned, although I haven't found anything specific.
@aspassovАй бұрын
Ruzzian troll 😅 @@_TeXoN_
@UncleManuelАй бұрын
"All was going well until it exploded." -some dude on the Internet 😁😁🤘🤘
@paulpantea9521Ай бұрын
Ariane demonstrated the ability to put stuff into orbit just fine. The problem was on the third engine light up which was supposed to deorbit the second stage, along with the reentry payloads. Still disappointing, but no concerns about the upcoming launches in the near future.
@admarsandbeyondАй бұрын
Don't Kuiper launches require the APU?
@paulpantea9521Ай бұрын
@@admarsandbeyond they do but they'll take a while, that's why I said "near future" 👀
@Pieman10101txАй бұрын
Moon caves. For when caves here on earth aren’t dangerous enough for you.
@scottmanleyАй бұрын
At least moon caves won’t be flooded.
@kobusdowney5291Ай бұрын
@@scottmanleysays who? They might contain ice. Herge might have been right with the Tintin comic: Explorers on the moon.
@nikolaideianov5092Ай бұрын
At least you wont drown@@kobusdowney5291
@chrissouthgate4554Ай бұрын
@@kobusdowney5291 Or H G Wells, "First Men in the Moon"
@M167A1Ай бұрын
@@scottmanleyYou say that like it doesn't suck to be engulfed in molten green cheese.
@johnburr9463Ай бұрын
Starliner is just the newest ISS module.
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
Might as well use the little fuel that it has to boost the ISS a little more
@TastyBusinessАй бұрын
I am so excited to hear about the Dawk MK-II Aurora update. Space planes ARE cool! Thanks Scott!
@williambaikie5739Ай бұрын
While using lava tunnels on the Moon for habitation is very cool. I've yet to hear anyone postulate these being cold traps for volatiles, similar to the craters on the poles which are in perpetual darkness. Perhaps H2O, Methane, and CO2 have deposited in the tubes and it might be much more pure due to not having impact dust mixed in.
@dmdrosselmeyerАй бұрын
Nothing like some space news with a cup of coffee and a morning dab🙏
@bastiat691Ай бұрын
The static fire became more dynamic than planned
@MCsCreationsАй бұрын
Thanks for all the updates, Scott! 😊 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@simonkovacic2585Ай бұрын
I think the Ariane 6 upper stage engine failed when it was supposed to fire a 3rd time, not 2nd
@SchinkeldinkАй бұрын
yes the supposed de-orbit burn
@billbassett887Ай бұрын
He said "it was supposed to relight the engine for the second time" .... in other words, the second re-light, which is the third light
@yumazsterАй бұрын
There was one successful relight, fault developed during the second on orbit burn and they couldn't relight it for the deorbit trajectory I think.
@Ph33NIXxАй бұрын
Oooh! Nice to hear Aurora news!
@davidlang4442Ай бұрын
Those holes on the moon look like a punch through of a space rock that hit a lava tube..
@linecraftman3907Ай бұрын
Earth also has these very sharp sinkholes when a cave forms under ground
@DeltariousАй бұрын
Please *keep* talking about Starlink launches even those that don't fail- the fact that they are becoming so mundane and routine is actually amazing and so the launches deserve to be documented. It's a good reminder that access to space has improved so much so quickly.
@momentik0712Ай бұрын
Its always a good day when Scott uploads!
@otpyrcralphpierre1742Ай бұрын
Excellent update! Thank you SO much!
@peeftribosАй бұрын
I would LOVE a video about the discoveries brought by Bennu, do we have enough for a video? 😅
@frankgulla2335Ай бұрын
Thanks, Scott. Great report and analysis.
@SandroWalachАй бұрын
My brain, somehow, read, "Great Scott." I have no idea how, but it did :P
@MrBoho7Ай бұрын
Thabks for the ICBM update, I loved your series on the history of them!
@krakheddАй бұрын
Roscosmos was most-accurately evicted for failing to pay rent and otherwise abide the terms of their lease
@0x8badbeefАй бұрын
A frustrating thing about these failures is they may not have sufficient telemetry in the area of failure.
@hamjudoАй бұрын
We can be sure that going forward there will be more telemetry in that region.
@JimWhitakerАй бұрын
As always, this is where I come to get decent (no, excellent) coverage of what is going on in spaceflight. Thanks Scott.
@terranovarain6570Ай бұрын
Wow lot going on in space news And the best place to get informed ❤
@KaroKujeАй бұрын
thanks for always being so thorough and meticulous!
@The_dislike_guyАй бұрын
July 2024: also known as *the month the firmament fought back*
@roguedruidАй бұрын
Patch notes: - Fixed bug that allowed players to glitch out of the skybox
@Nathan-vt1jzАй бұрын
The SpaceX failure is the most significant as it may interrupt other launches/missions, possibly even those to the ISS. The US doesn’t have a good alternative ready to go without asking the Russians for help, which is obviously problematic with the war in Ukraine. On the plus, I’m really stoked for the next Starship launch! At the least we should get to see some cool ‘virtual’ catch’s over the water and at best we’ll get to see a full catch test of the booster! (I say all this as a SpaceX fanboy)
@_TeXoN_Ай бұрын
Falcon 9 was completely without alternatives last year. I am happy to see that H-III, Vulcan and Ariane 6 are now entering service and slowly distributing the risk in the western launcher market.
@raybod1775Ай бұрын
Failure is part of rocket science… and anything else cutting edge.
@donjones4719Ай бұрын
If the US had an urgent need to launch in the next couple of weeks NASA or the DoD would authorize it. (The FAA only has authority over commercial payload launches.) They'd certainly do that before relying on Russia. Nothing else is that urgent, even the next Cargo Dragon and Crew Dragon missions. If by some vanishingly small minute chance F9 was grounded for months then a NASA or DoD authorization would be more likely, still before Russia. Any purely commercial launches will just have to wait. By law they can't go on Soyuz and Vulcan will make only 2 flights by the end of the year, if lucky.
@javaman4584Ай бұрын
I was annoyed when you said they were going to beam hip-hop music into space, but since they're aiming at Venus, which is almost literally Hell, I'm ok with that.
@IdkhowtofkinreadАй бұрын
Love that
@donjones4719Ай бұрын
At leas it wasn't rap. But then the headline couldn't say they launched music.
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
Hey! Respect Venus! Part of my family lives there!
@TheMoneypresidentАй бұрын
Beastie boys blowing ships up. Worst moment in star trek history.
@SpaceGhost1701Ай бұрын
Racist vibes coming from you.
@MisterItchyАй бұрын
Just wanted you to know that, even though your delivery was more than suitably dessicated, your "First word problem" was received and appreciated.
@CodyDockertyАй бұрын
The way you said "it's still not coming home" I'm curious how close to the Euro finals this was recorded
@blimeycrikeyАй бұрын
FAA to SpaceX: You're grounded. FAA to Boeing: Meehhh.. lets see how it goes Buddy.
@andrewgarley1400Ай бұрын
Love your show, from the UK
@jonathanshaw6784Ай бұрын
"it's still not coming home" Subtle dig at English football there.
@SteeyuvАй бұрын
Which means it’ll be wasted on them! (joke…)
@brettwoodard167Ай бұрын
Thanks Scott!
@derekwood8184Ай бұрын
I love that the launch of mutliple superconstellation satellites on a rocket that lands tail first on a boat in the middle of the ocean makes you go "yeah boring".. how far we have come in the last few years!
@chris-hayesАй бұрын
15:48 ooh, the flaps on New Zealand's tail fin has a similar design to the shuttle's, where the tail flap is 2 pieces, they both pop out to slow down the aircraft on landing.
@peterwilson7532Ай бұрын
The Ariane 6 launch was great. So some engineers and agencies are actually still capable of building a whole new rocket and getting it right first time. What an achievement, well done ESA. Exploding rockets is getting pretty boring these days. Now Europe has a great new medium to high power independent launch capability. Perfect for the politics of the current era and half the price of Ariane 5. I just hope they stay away from manned spaceflight, a huge waste of money for boring missions. It'll be nice to get some good Ariane launched scientific exploratory missions launched to continue their previous great achievements including launching the James Webb Space Telescope.
@admarsandbeyondАй бұрын
Lots of rockets got it right first time, e.g. Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Vulcan. Starship has a different development process (hardware rich rapid iterative) because it's pioneering into the unknown on the bleeding edge of space tech. Ariane6 also is not half price of Ariane5. Even if we take away the 300 million per year subsidies for assured access, the 4B dev money rightoff, the free new launch site, Ariane64 (which is the one comparable to A5, 62 is comparable to Suyuz) is still only about 10% cheaper.
@revmsjАй бұрын
Idk they’re still a whole APU away from your premature congratulations it would seem…
@therealchertiАй бұрын
long time since I got notifications for your videos. Recently got kerbal space program up and just needed to binge watch your videos again. Love your stuff
@ValentineC137Ай бұрын
Static fire failure: engine damaged on ascent
@seasong7655Ай бұрын
The story from China is crazy. I'm surprised how big the fireball was as well
@spikespa5208Ай бұрын
The test "was not as static as they anticipated." Uh huh. 😒
@raybod1775Ай бұрын
Stuff happens, can’t fail without trying.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742Ай бұрын
@@spikespa5208 They successfully failed.
@chrissouthgate4554Ай бұрын
The amazing thing is how close to built-up areas it was!
@madsam0320Ай бұрын
@@chrissouthgate4554the whole area was evacuated.
@FrankDTank-lf4dqАй бұрын
wow just heard your voice in the new hbo wild wild space documentary 👏
@albertvanlingen7590Ай бұрын
....the recent solar storm we had caused the outer atmosphere to become much thicker amplifying drag. Could that impact the second stages?
@nils1543Ай бұрын
Scott, I'd love to see some videos on the new Sentinel nuclear missile. You know both rockets and nukes so I'm sure you could give some interesting commentary on it.
@craigmooring2091Ай бұрын
Good stuff as usual, Scott, except for the part starting @ about 3:32 when you said, "...we were able to see it where I was...137 degree inclination orbit which meant it kind of flew East over the Pacific..." I didn't know you had gone to Panama, the only place on the Pacific coast in the Americas, south of Alaska, where anything CAN go East over the Pacific. 😊
@sheldoniusRexАй бұрын
You need to look more closely at the geography of southern California. The coast curves hard to the east approaching Mexico, where it is conceivable to look east-southeast and be looking at ocean.
@elisha.schiffАй бұрын
Perhaps you could explain what you meant by there not really being science reasons for sls?
@javant6993Ай бұрын
I think because reasons would be that it is not very practical to operate the SLS? Costs something like $2 bil to launch
@californiascapesАй бұрын
This was a great video.
@Imagine_BeyondАй бұрын
The Block 2 nose cone looks like a penguin in the photo 13:56
@ganonzero1Ай бұрын
Yessss! A guy on another channel actually traced out the outline, and filled in all the penguin details. 😂
@Imagine_BeyondАй бұрын
@@ganonzero1 Yes I saw that. It was Matt lowne
@rizizumАй бұрын
I made a Starship in KSP and from some angles it's just straight up a penguin, especially when i turn the lights on
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
@@rizizum Perhaps Elon Musk should change the name to Penguin Imagine: "the Penguin" super heavy launch vehicle
@ravimehta7302Ай бұрын
Did you see the computers being suggested for the "Replacement Modernization Design"? At 10:48
@heatshieldАй бұрын
Missy Elliott? Okay I did not hear about that yet. You’re one in a million.
@johnbazaar8440Ай бұрын
From: NASA To: Congress Re: Non NASA SLS customers -- Nada! Sincerely, NASA
@ronwatkins5775Ай бұрын
Wondering why China doesn't make greater use of it's east coast for launch centers compared to inland sites?
@dalehill6127Ай бұрын
The Chinese nature has always been secretive. Yes they copy, and no they don't want anyone else copying them. Specifically they want to keep all of their launches as far away as possible from prying Western eyes around the coast. You might also have noticed that in the last month or two they've been giving the world less and less notice of their launches - IIRC the last one went up just 4 hours after they announced it. I think all spacefaring nations are worried about someone else's on-orbit assets inspecting and potentially sabotaging their upper stages during launches...which makes me wonder mightily about those mysterious sudden upper stage problems of Ariane and the Falcon... 🤔
@janusli8820Ай бұрын
Because the current launch sites were built to launch missiles during the cold war. And China coundn't defend its coast properly back then.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEmanАй бұрын
Great video, Scott...👍
@somethingclever1234Ай бұрын
6:50 is that before or after the FAA Boeing thruster investigation???
@jespadoАй бұрын
Only S.P.E.C.T.R.E has the capacity to do something like this!
@blackterminalАй бұрын
Thanks Scott.
@chrischteaАй бұрын
speaking of asteroid detection: have you or will you do a video on Apophis?
@JustSomeCanuckАй бұрын
"Who is Missy Elliot? We asked for more Chuck Berry."
@elmofeneken4364Ай бұрын
Another batch of great space related info. Now you can enjoy that package of peanuts sitting behind you on the counter.
@Forcemaster2000Ай бұрын
3 upper stage failures in a row...the aliens on the moon are trying to slow us down again!
@richardbaker1308Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@seancarroll146Ай бұрын
Spectacular Static Fire!!!!
@peterbustin2683Ай бұрын
Ah. Theyve discovered the soup dragon's home!
@nemom225Ай бұрын
Keep talking about Star link! We appreciate the accuracy!
@RFC3514Ай бұрын
0:18 - That sentence (complete with the head movement) sounded exactly like _The Onion's_ Michael Falk. 😄
@digitalplaylandАй бұрын
Stuckliner is not stuck. It's just on organic scheduling. Working hard on how not to die on re-entry.
@privateerburrowsАй бұрын
What direction is "leeward"? Online dictionaries don't help; they all say "In the direction of the wind" but don't clarify if it's the direction the wind is going towards, or the direction it is coming from.
@playitlouder451Ай бұрын
downwind
@RechargeableLithiumАй бұрын
In nautical parlance, the usual origin of aviation and space terminology, the lee is the side of a ship or a shore where the wind is blocked by the object. On a boat, with wind blowing directly from the left across the boat, the right is the lee side. Same for an island - land reduces the effect of wind on the lee (vice windward) side
@stargazer7644Ай бұрын
The lee side is the protected side - the side the wind doesn't reach. That's the downwind side.
@privateerburrowsАй бұрын
@@stargazer7644 Ah, thank you all for the explanations. Now I understand.
@TimothyLipinskiАй бұрын
Great Video ! My brother has seen a previous launch in 2024 of the Falcon 9 from the California SFB from the foothills on the East side of Albuquerque with NO clouds in the way ! I may have to go to a higher elevation to see if I can see Starship launch from Texas if the weather is clear to the South ! New Mexico has some Lava Tube Caves in western NM on the South side of I-40 ! tjl
@DonBoochАй бұрын
Not to take away from this excellent video, but something exciting happened in Rocketry. An AI completed its first 3d print of a working rocket engine, and I would rather hear the details from you. Will you be doing that video soon?
@vincentcleaver1925Ай бұрын
The falcon side of SpaceX has a lot of good will to lean on, plus that team is all over this, unless all the gonzo engineers moved on or over
@simon9070Ай бұрын
any news on those two Boeing astronauts?
@luciealieАй бұрын
First: Scott, thank you for your awesome, easy to understand videos. Second: It look like Falcon 9 are back in game (at least, by the Next Spaceflight app), do you know something more?
@jimmyjames2022Ай бұрын
The Inhibitors have arrived.
@Fister_of_MuppetsАй бұрын
One of these days I want this jovial fella to start a video like: "Hello, it's Scott Manley here, come here let me tickle ya..."
@MarkGoldfainАй бұрын
I'd love to see the rest of that t-shirt Scott was wearing.
@bastersturmАй бұрын
a brief moment i fotgot you´re a DJ. so the music news are exciting
@JoseLuceroRodriguezАй бұрын
its the sophons
@friendlycommentwolfАй бұрын
Thanks
@cduemoАй бұрын
Love your content. T-shirt details...?
@extraordinarilybasic3250Ай бұрын
Something about the FAA completely grounding SpaceX rubs me the wrong way. A rocket that doesn’t have an issue until it’s already outside of earths atmosphere is more important while the FAA continues to let Boeing fly planes that aren’t constructed correctly.
@charliekempfАй бұрын
It's standard procedure unfortunately. Besides, I don't think SpaceX or it's customers (manned or unmanned) want F9 to fly anyway until they figure out what is wrong.
@Mike.The.JewelerАй бұрын
I've been saying this for years. Spacex hiccups and the faa / fcc shuts them down, meanwhile boeing having multiple hull-loss level problems every flight and they just go "aww poor boeing, did you need us to ask congress for another two billion for you?"
@bobert6259Ай бұрын
Those are completely different situations and not comparable. Firstly flying is much more important for day to day needs and you can’t just ground all Boeings Boeing planes have taken hundreds of millions of flights with something like
@Mike.The.JewelerАй бұрын
@extraordinarilybasic3250 meanwhile congress: "aww poor boeing, did you need another 2 billion?"
@andrewdrednaughtАй бұрын
Yep. Is spaceflight supposed to be dangerous and you sign a paper where it states that you won't sue the government?
@benjamino.7475Ай бұрын
140 billion dollars on missile silos, (no big deal) compared to the 25 billion dollars on Nasa. Great use of money
@sheldoniusRexАй бұрын
It's a fantastic use of money. Unless you'd rather your grandchildren listen to this broadcast in Mandarin or Russian.
@TheTamrielАй бұрын
A pit might lead to a lunar lava tube but is nonsensical cos the bottom is out of direct reach and communication with Earth is impossible from down there anyway. A horizontally accessible lunar lava tube is the only practicable way to go for a protected Moon base and to maintain communication.
@adamcollegeman2Ай бұрын
excellent
@paulmoffat9306Ай бұрын
It seems that accidents always happen in '3's - Passenger plane crashes, Ship sinkings, Rocket Launches and so on.
@vicroc4Ай бұрын
I believe it's the French that have a saying, "Troubles come in threes."
@johnnylongfeather3086Ай бұрын
No
@simongeard4824Ай бұрын
@@vicroc4 But it's also "third time lucky", so the proverbs are hedging their bets.
@zlm001Ай бұрын
Thanks.
@cmdraftbrnАй бұрын
The Crust. coming to life
@saumyacow4435Ай бұрын
Hey Scott, regarding Archimedes. Do you know if that's a test of the pre-burner or just the ignition system?
@SRFirefoxАй бұрын
"Other customers for SLS." What garbage. SLS was built specifically for NASA. SLS, regardless of the politics of using Shuttle parts, does one thing well: Launch heavy payloads in one go into high energy orbits. No other rocket we currently have is capable of sending large payloads as far or as fast. If Congress wants it to be cheaper they could always buy thirty of them.
@davisdf3064Ай бұрын
Congress, as always, not understanding how spaceflight works
@Mckjku1629 күн бұрын
The thing about sentinel is the massive cost overruns. It’s something like 80% over budget so far
@penguin44caАй бұрын
Elom said it was an engineering upgrade for this flight. Rolled back the upgrade for the next. Also the starlink Sats managed to raise their orbits except for 7
@scottmanleyАй бұрын
TLEs?
@stevengaming3689Ай бұрын
Scott, are you going to do anything about these bots commenting?
@I-0-0-IАй бұрын
We can report them, misinformation is an option for Apollo deniers for example. I think if enough people report, they go away.
@Hungary_0987Ай бұрын
I hope so. Make this the Top comment so he sees this!
@PeizxcvАй бұрын
Google isn’t doing a thing so what can any uploader do? You have to realize fighting BOT and scams are customer service and the less Google can spend on customer the more profit they have
@ThetimecapsuletxАй бұрын
How can you tell a bot comment from a real one?
@cube2foxАй бұрын
If it's a woman - probably a bot. (Not many real women interested in Scott's videos.)