Tammy Duckworth-Lead Sponsor Of Dem IVF Bill-Reacts To Failure Of Senate To Advance It

Рет қаралды 6,401

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 138

@conniebo7694 Ай бұрын

You’re a liar Tammy! Stop the rhetoric, the Supreme Court said it’s up to the States Tammy, he can have his 1st Amendment rights!

@aquiferjunkie4413 Ай бұрын

How does trump have anything to do with this? Your bill obviously violates state law on abortion. Rewrite it

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

It isn't a rewriting of the bill that would fix anything. It's archaic state laws being so restrictive that the IVF procedure itself is threatened by them. Read the bill at congress.gov. See for yourself.

@trueheart8390 Ай бұрын

Planned Parenthood should pay for it.

@billj4137 Ай бұрын

And Trump should pay for his own security

@cseals1st Ай бұрын

Fact check the congress woman

@daviddyer730 Ай бұрын

She says Republicans are sending up a red herring but omits what pork is the democrats bill. What are they trying to push through along with the IVF! Both sides need to tell the whole truth but in this case It’s all about the PORK!!!! Just write a bill with this one single issue, No pork, nothing more or less and I believe it will pass!

@RobinaB530 Ай бұрын

Which facts don't you like?

@will-vi9pk Ай бұрын

@@RobinaB530 Trump actually supported IVF so her story doesn't hold water. So she isn't being honest you notice how she isn't being specific about why the bill failed. This is a common tactic they will amend pork to it or a poison pill in the senate that they control and pass it back. The truth is Congress very seldom listens to trump on bills.

@independent900 Ай бұрын

@@RobinaB530The facts she's omitting.

@RobinaB530 Ай бұрын

@@independent900 On what topic?

@wrestleXrock Ай бұрын

So what else is in the bill?

@rikeshpr85 Ай бұрын

A lot of Democrat PorkBarrel and BS

@puddintayne9254 Ай бұрын

That was my question

@sandyc5428 Ай бұрын

Republicans like to add pork in the bill to use as an excuse or benefit from it. Remember when Republicans gave themselves a raise to approve the budget.

@sandyc5428 Ай бұрын

All the Republican Senators running for re election just voted against your right to IVF. Rick Scott, FL but he had a false Ad supporting IVF. Marsha Blackburn, TN Josh Hawley, MO Kevin Cramer, ND Ted Cruz, TX Deb Fischer, NB Pete Ricketts, NB Roger Wicker, MS John Barrasso, WY JD Vance did not Vote as usual. That was expected. He didn’t vote on Child tax Credit either. And he has ruined his OH state spewing his conspiracy theory in Springfield.

@KrustyKlown Ай бұрын

@@rikeshpr85 Republicans do NOT want to side with a ProChoice bill, ProLifers & Project 2025 is Anti-IVF.

@CharlesFlato-wn2qf Ай бұрын

I believe that a embryo has a right to further its life.

@KrustyKlown Ай бұрын

sure is WEIRD .. how ProLifers are anti-IVF, a process that creates life. Holding inconsistent & incompatible beliefs, makes one WEIRD.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@CharlesFlato-wn2qf without protection for the IVF process that gives that embryo a chance, it would not exist. And if that embryo would develop into a fetus that could not survive to term or long after birth due to tragic issues of incompatibility with life, it seems more cruel to cause it to needlessly suffer. Until an embryo is implemented and has the possibility to undergo gestation, it has no life or potential. This actually occurs regularly in nature. Fertilized eggs that fail to implant are flushed from the body during menstruation. Each of the 2% of live births, miracle babies as their parents consider them, have IVF to thank. They were given a future life they would not have if we choose to consider each embryo as more than what it actually is and allow that to make IVF unavailable. That is just how I weigh it.

@shaunaustin7848 Ай бұрын

IVF is already legal in all 50 states, I wonder what was really in the bill

@sansarim2498 Ай бұрын

Lmao it not legal in all 50 state check your information,plus it single bill nothing was in it,keep believing your dear leader on as much crap they keep feeding you,😂😂

@Drannn54 Ай бұрын

@@sansarim2498he is just a bot of trump

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

Not gonna lie, it is long but, I read it. I can tell you, it covers support for IVF and ensures no loopholes allow for anyone to prevent it from protecting the right to IVF. Including a very detailed portion on protections for our service members and veterans.

@suzannahlocklair Ай бұрын

@@Kesileighthat’s all you read? Come on now. Tell the truth. Cruz’s bill was specifically about Cruz’s bill. If Democrats really wanted to protect IVF, they would have voted for that bill. Seriously? You didn’t even mention the poison pills.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@suzannahlocklair because I don't see any in there despite reading it critically for them. Please let me know which points you find poisonous. Upon reading the bill (not originally Cruz's btw) I was surprised at how half the text was subjective "findings" and the other half did nothing to actually protect IVF. It did contain a threat to withhold funding to states who don't comply with that bill but fail to define anything in a way that would actually protect IVF. Willing to hear your position on either bill further if you would like to point at what I may have missed.

@crowbarduck1818 Ай бұрын

It was a pork bill.....

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

Really? Have you read it? Curious to know what part is the pork. I was disappointed that I read it in search of pork and found NONE. It's basically vegan. And long, full of definitions and protections for our military... And now I'm hungry for a BLT.

@TinaJordan-v4h Ай бұрын

Gop has a tendency to block when there is extra pork in a bill. Get truthful with people! I need to find this bill!

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@TinaJordan-v4h congress.gov search S.4445 and be prepared, it's quite long. I went in expecting to find what 44 Senators found objectionable and couldn't find it. Let me know if you do.

@aquiferjunkie4413 Ай бұрын

@@TinaJordan-v4h it's not that hard to find. Only 1 page

@anitabishop3483 Ай бұрын

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, Always Trumps fault... Your bill sucks! So quit blaming Trump!!

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

Honestly... Have you read it? Have you read the one proposed by Republican Senators? If you have and still feel this way, I would love to hear your reasoning.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

Genetic altering of embryo should not be in the ivf bill

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@jeffashcraft2388 where did you read that in the bill? I didn't see it.

@will-vi9pk Ай бұрын

That would be crazy you have to be kidding.

@lovegingernmurphy Ай бұрын

Something is fishy about this bill.

@annettecrank3142 Ай бұрын

Tell the whole truth about the language in the bill. And quit trashing President Trump.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

Does the language in the bill sound too "legal"? Compare the two bills S.4445 and S.4365 at congress.gov and let me know what you think about how bills should be written.

@thebiz313 Ай бұрын

The democrats added a bill to the Republicans single ivf bill that would have protected ivf

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@thebiz313 actually... That's not accurate. I encourage you to read both bills and see if you feel the same way.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

If one compares this "Bill" to the one proposed by Decocratic Senator Tammy Duckworth and cosponsored by 48 other Senators, it tells you everything you need to know. One is a well constructed and throughly thought through proposal and the other is comparable to the book report written after watching the movie, while on the way to school the day that it's due. It's so obvious which bill is a "show vote" and if you happen to catch Senator Cruz speaking about the motivation of his colleagues across the aisle, he essentially spills the beans on his own. Thanks Senator Cruz for making this matter so clear!

@puddintayne9254 Ай бұрын

What pork was in the bill? There is usually a reason bills get denied when is a dem bill. This woman is a liar.

@sandyc5428 Ай бұрын

The Problem maga. If there is pork in a bill never does a GOP Congressman compromise. That’s what they use to do, bipartisan. Don’t use that lame excuse.

@ffc303 Ай бұрын

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@twoweimies Ай бұрын

Wow. Forbes you can do better than this

@billj4137 Ай бұрын

Try reading it before complaining

@jacolbykirkhart9557 Ай бұрын

@@billj4137 why don't you go read it and tell us you approve if everything on there

@bigjon420 Ай бұрын

Trump isn't even office so stop with this strawman argument

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@bigjon420 to play devil's advocate a little, his actions while in office caused a loophole to open. His words during his campaign, supporting IVF, would seem to have made this easy to pass but it really seems as though the 44 nay voters would have voted yay if it wasn't still a Biden/Harris administration. So you can't actually accurately claim strawman here.

@GARYPREJNA-mq6zi Ай бұрын

Duckworth nut case

@michelevogt603 Ай бұрын

Enough with the lies. Trump has not been in office in 3 and half years. Pick someone else to blame.

@independent900 Ай бұрын

This "reporter" is a hack. Why didn't she interview a republican and have them explain why they rejected the bill. W/o hearing from both sides, this interview is useless!

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

They have them as well. Just in separate videos. Just click their channel.

@independent900 Ай бұрын

@@Kesileigh Hmm. I wonder why they publish each sides argument in a separate video. No thanks, I won't give them the click.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@independent900 because most people can't sit still to watch a 30 min video. But have fun in your echo chamber. I will continue to find comfort in the face that I actually try to see controversial topics from multiple angles (because it matters enough to me to do so) and I don't let myself fall victim to merely believing what people tell me I should (particularly when motive is factored in). Also, I encourage you to look for the actual recording of the sessions and read the bills in question for yourself. Boring, yes. Painfully long, yes. But I like knowing what I'm talking about before I put things out there. I won't tell you what you should take from it, only that you owe it to yourself and those around you to do the work. Unless you like being led, I suppose.

@independent900 Ай бұрын

@Kesileigh I commented on a video and took it at face value. I didn't comment on the bill because the reporter didn't offer a balanced reporting of the issues. This video is one-sided and presents a biased perspective. If there's a 2nd interview with the opposing viewpoint, they should have linked and referenced them...they didn't as far as I could tell. Everything you wrote sounds like it came from a delusional elitist. No one will, or is expected to hunt down all reference material from every news commentary...that's a ridiculous premise. We can however, judge the content on face value, and that's what I did.

@Kesileigh 22 күн бұрын

@@independent900 I'm saddened that you read it as having a "delusional elitist" voice. And a bit confused. Nothing elitist or delusional about suggesting one might benefit from being informed. Being simply reactionary to a video and judgemental that they didn't make it easier for you to see their other content, isn't doing you any favors. Being more concerned with avoiding giving clicks than finding out more is a sad thing. You already gave them the click by watching in the first place and boosting the video to the algorithm by commenting several times.

@normacasey3760 Ай бұрын

Other things in the bill...taxpayers pay for sex change operations for illegal aliens in detention, experimenting with drugs on children etc, cloning

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@normacasey3760 none of those are in the bill. I checked. You should too.

@evieem80 Ай бұрын

Ok so the bill says that 1. this is for pro family fertility and they can seek out their own provider and they must provide the service and insurance is to cover it without prohibition, limitation, interference or impediment. 2. Allow Veterans and service members to store their eggs and also for research on Veterans and service members reproductive health 🤔 3. Requiring employer sponsored and other public insurance plans to cover these treatments to protect Americans from excessive out of pocket expenses. 4. Promote standardization and widespread availability of ivf by requiring employer supported insurance plans. Require insurance carriers that participate in the WORLDS LARGEST employer supported insurance plan, ART and FEHB to cover the costs and medications for 3 cycles. This is an elective procedure. So they want to force employers to pay for the conception and then the parental leave once the baby is born? What research will they be doing on the Veterans or service members eggs that go unused? Protect Americans from excessive out of pocket expenses?? HELLO?! Where’s all this energy coming from? 😂 Insurance will cover 3 cycles. Is this a year or 3x flat? So you vote for this and don’t get your baby in 3 tries then what? That’s a lot of undue stress on parents 😢 Y’all be on the lookout for them to be selling us out by ceding our sovereignty to the UN and the WHO in a non congress vote that’s coming before the election.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@evieem80 a few points of clarification: you may want to reread the portion you are referencing in point 2. In point 4, the existing plans will be covering them if they already include obstetric services. It would be up to the insurance company as to how costs are calculated which is also touched on in the bill. Three cycles of egg retrieval and unlimited implantation. I don't think that would cause undue stress. Figuring how to pay for services to help you conceive a child and do what 98% of the other families can without intervention, is though. And the process of preparing for egg retrieval is intense and not without potential issues. Prompting more eggs to be ready to be retrieved than in a typical cycle isn't easy on the body or without risk. But it is one that ivm certain is thought to be very much worth taking for the parents of those 2% that managed to afford to be able to. If a service member can opt to store their reproductive genetic material so that their loved ones aren't deprived of the ability to create a family in the event that they lose the ability to do so through combat or they themselves are lost is actually kind of relieving and something I think we should be providing our military. They are expected to sign a directive (plan) for what they and their loved ones want to do in the event they are no longer able to voice their wishes much like many other things they already include in directives when deployed. IF they for whatever reason opt to donate, I don't see it much different from organ donation, conceptually. All that said, I appreciate you looking into it and sharing your thoughts. It's a very long read so that's quite admirable!

@edwinmalachy Ай бұрын

We do NOT NEED to fund anything like this. Its not the business of the government. N

@Drannn54 Ай бұрын

Then what’s the business of the government? You are liar

@blackbetty-id1zo Ай бұрын

@@Drannn54 😢😢😢😢

@ziggybear-l1p Ай бұрын

It's not about the bill it's about what's in the bill besides what this lying Democrat has to say she's truly the duck

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@ziggybear-l1p just curious, have you read it? I have. I didn't see anything in it not pertaining to IVF even though I, like you, expected there to be.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

If you want a law for genetic alterations to the embryo write a bill for it stand alone bill. Quit combining pork into the bills on issues you cant get passed as a standalone bill.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@jeffashcraft2388 which title is the genetic alterations of embryos under? I didn't see it.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

@@Kesileigh she said non viable embryos that can lead to miscarriage! How can doctors know that 100% that it will happen. What if a doctor chooses an embryo to discard that in reality could be Einstein or Newton. Isn't this playing God?

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

I think that question should be 100% questioned and perhaps it not even addressed in the Bill.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

I wouldn't pass the bill until that question is answered.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

I need to read the Bill thoroughly before I can decide and that may be why many haven't passed the bill because voters haven't even read it. Which I will look it up and research it myself to see what pork may be in it. And Democrats making it a political topic makes me want to disapprove the bill even more. I will give it a thorough read PROMISE

@Ldog404 Ай бұрын

Well gosh - what else was in the Bill??!? 😂

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

Congress.gov S.4445 read it and find out.

@delbertfalloway4693 Ай бұрын

She is probably corrupt

@evieem80 Ай бұрын

Take out probably in that statement

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@evieem80 has either of you read the bill? Or the one Ted Cruz thinks is better? She's a veteran and a mother who wants to make access to IVF a codified right. But I'm open to reviewing your evidence of corruption.

@evieem80 Ай бұрын

@@Kesileigh I am a veterans spouse 100% disabled combat veteran, so her being a veteran means what to me? I am a mother too and her being a mother means what to me? Elective procedures mean squat to me when the government and private health insurance companies that we pay into won’t cover 100% of medically necessary procedures. Come talk to me when they can make that happen first 😉

@Kesileigh 22 күн бұрын

@@evieem80 I thank you both for your service. And I also wish the government, insurance companies and citizens, in general, did more for our veterans. That's why I joined the VFW Auxiliary. I didn't serve but I can help serve those who did. The "veteran" and "mother" part of my comment wasn't meant to mean anything more to you than that she wrote the bill after having been injured in service to our country and having to rely on IVF due to the injuries sustained. So, it would stand to reason that her motivation is to make a bill we can all agree to, for anyone, but especially to make it less difficult for our veterans and service members because she had experienced the struggle herself. Not because of corruption as the original comment suggested. I was not at all implying that being a veteran or mother could exempt her from being corrupt. Do you have some other evidence that she is corrupt? I'm not aware of anything and nothing in her bill suggests corruption but I'm genuinely interested in hearing about the reasons why you feel that way. And I was asking a serious question when I asked if either of you had read the proposed bills. It wasn't intended to be so triggering.

@BeckyClark-r6u Ай бұрын

Get over your Trump problems

@charliebrown5611 Ай бұрын

The GOP blocked it.

@adamschrader328 Ай бұрын

Good

@rossthompson7956 Ай бұрын

Good and we need voter integrity.

@conniebo7694 Ай бұрын

This is the Lady who brings your baby to congress Lady!

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

This is a lie

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@jeffashcraft2388 is it though? Which part?

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

@@Kesileigh If you want a law for genetic alterations to the embryo write a bill for it stand alone bill. Quit combining pork into the bills on issues you cant get passed as a standalone bill.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@jeffashcraft2388 I'm not sure where you are getting genetic alterations from. Sounds like a scare tactic and also not in the bill. As much as I like bacon, this bill could pass for vegan.

@jeffashcraft2388 Ай бұрын

@@Kesileigh Specifically, under the bill, individuals have the right to access fertility treatments and to make decisions about the use of their reproductive genetic material (e.g., embryos) without limitation or interference. Honestly the bill as I read it has no safeguards in it to protect the embryo and blocking of modified embryo's. Specifically, under the bill, individuals have the right to access fertility treatments and to make decisions about the use of their reproductive genetic material (e.g., embryos) without limitation The last 2 words in this portion of the bill "without limitations" concerns me.

@Kesileigh Ай бұрын

@@jeffashcraft2388 so I can see where the words "without limitations" could give you pause. However, the way I read it and bills/laws in general, the definitions near the beginning define the limitations of the bill. So while they must be given access without limitation, what they have access to does have limitations that they define. "6) WIDELY ACCEPTED AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICAL STANDARDS OF CARE.-The term 'widely accepted and evidence-based medical standards of care' means any medical services, procedures, and practices that are in accordance with the guidelines of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine." The process as defined must be clinically appropriate and the part to role of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to determine appropriate. But let me know if you don't have the same understanding.

@beckywalker4037 Ай бұрын

I have been asking people that say Trump is a liar yet no one can even name one.

@anchorman317 Ай бұрын

No this bill would have violated certain hospitals religious rights to conduct business how they see fit. Not all providers feel that IVF is something that they want to provide and that bill would force them to give access. Even if if it went against the philosophy or policies of the hospital

@lovegingernmurphy Ай бұрын

Why is the government in our healthcare!?