Always mystified that the British never did similar with their Vickers light vehicles. Yes, they later got the more capable/flexible Priest/Sexton, but early war, they were making Vickers lights at smaller manufacturers and those with no experience of making armoured vehicles as a training vehicle. As they were already engine forward, fighting compartment rear, it seems like a good candidate for a field gun. After all, they received some 900 75mm guns from the USA early war, would have made a good general purpose tank buster, self propelled arty.
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
Do you mean the Mk VI ? I can imagine the chassis being too weak compared to Pz I or II.
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
@@ottovonbismarck2443 Germany converted some Mk IVs to GMCs with the old 10,5-cm Feldhaubitze 16 *. . .*
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
@@letoubib21 Thanks for the info ! Then the British were just lazy. :-)
@TheLastSterling13043 жыл бұрын
I'd assume it would have been caused by the Regimental System shaping doctrine of the British much in the Same way the Infantry Tanks didn't need to move fast. Plus there's there's the issue of the Royal Armoured Corps being overly possessive of Tanks much like how the RAF at the same time controlled the RN's own aircraft.
@mausonahouse_12393 жыл бұрын
It was probably too small for the big guns like the 76mm witch is what they needed at the time but early in the war they could have used the very affective 75mm but I can’t think of any other guns with the right amount of power for late war engagements with German tanks.
@HamanKarn567 Жыл бұрын
Always loved these type of vehicles. Especially in strategy games.
@WindHaze103 жыл бұрын
This fella Mark is the best narrator you have.
@parallel-knight3 жыл бұрын
This channel needs more love
@angelogarcia2189 Жыл бұрын
I think that is actually a picture of the OKW. The OKH was the army (HEER) high command. fun fact; Germany in ww2 didn't have a unified command structure because of these two 'high commands'
@Unfassbarer Жыл бұрын
Danke!
@TanksEncyclopediaYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@shatbad29603 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation!
@billd.iniowa22633 жыл бұрын
Nice video, I learned alot. Including what Hummel means. I knew what Wespe meant, but it never occurred to ask myself what Hummel was, lol. -- Oh BTW, the reason the name Wespe was discontinued is because hilter didnt like it. Sounded puny to him. Maybe they should have named it GIANT Wasp.
@robertsperti59263 жыл бұрын
What about Murder Wasp??sounds pretty dangerous.
@billd.iniowa22633 жыл бұрын
@@robertsperti5926 lol Kinda sounds like a bad Bee movie. ;-)
@parrot849 Жыл бұрын
If that’s the case, what was o’ Adolf think’n when he named the Panzer VIII, the Maus? The mouse!🐁
@marksmith892811 ай бұрын
Actually, that is backwards. Colonel General Jodl ordered that the name Hummel was to be no longer used as the "bumble bee" name was thought to be not aggressive enough for a vehicle with such a large gun. Early 1945. There is documentation to prove this. Thought you might like to know.
@wogelson3 жыл бұрын
02:02 that's what she said
@PanzerdivisionWiking3 жыл бұрын
Have you guys done the Jagdpanther? It’s pretty good looking and lethal, I am aware that crews may have been less trained or ready by the time these rolled out, but all the same they are very interesting
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
We have a decent article on the Jagdpanther already tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/jagdpanther.php However, one of our writers has expressed interest in rewriting it, so a new version with video might come in the future. Not very soon though.
@PanzerdivisionWiking3 жыл бұрын
@@TanksEncyclopediaYT awesome thank you so much!
@imablock16 Жыл бұрын
16:23 what a ride that must have been for that sherman crew lol
@viniciusrodrigues1213 жыл бұрын
could make a video talking about versions of unique tanks: Flakpanzer T-34 and panzer 1 PaK-40?
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Hello Vinicius, While such articles are within our sights and within our scope, they are not currently in the works. You can add them to our Public Suggestion List and you can help by adding more sources (or other suggested articles) docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p0Ll9TITGDiF9_fdS-tv1797JBs0_-pB70ReE_kIRkE/edit#gid=1911430820 Also, in order to help us with illustrating and publishing, please do consider donating through Patreon or Paypal. www.patreon.com/tankartfund Paypal.me/tankartfund
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
How many T-34 were converted ? I always thought this was a unique field conversion.
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
@@ottovonbismarck2443 2 AFAIK
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
@@TanksEncyclopediaYT Thx !
@kiowhatta1 Жыл бұрын
Why they didn’t just refine the dicker max to have an enclosed superstructure mystify‘s me. Or just use the Stug with the 105mm.
@jimcase3097 Жыл бұрын
Very good 👍
@johnfrench12393 жыл бұрын
Excellent thank you
@athiftsabit12083 жыл бұрын
Nice clear narrative
@rm5902 Жыл бұрын
Excellent
@Kyle-gw6qp3 жыл бұрын
It's like I always say, if you're vehicle isn't good enough, just make the gun really big.
@Mate3973 жыл бұрын
More dakka never hurts
@attaque713 жыл бұрын
And a long winded designation to match.
@GerardMenvussa3 жыл бұрын
3:30 What is this tank, with the small machine gun turret at the front?
@sovietcat19723 жыл бұрын
its a Neubaufahrzeug en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neubaufahrzeug
@ricochettheprotogen49283 жыл бұрын
@@sovietcat1972 I just wanted to say that
@copter20003 жыл бұрын
I think it's Neubaufahrzeug. The angle just make it look smaller.
@2ndcomingofFritz3 жыл бұрын
It is a Neubaufahrzeug.
@GerardMenvussa3 жыл бұрын
Thanks you, very interesting. I think I knew about these but totally forgot they existed.
@mauriciomorais78183 жыл бұрын
Was the Panzer II chassis cheaper to produce than the 38t ?
@theassening45633 жыл бұрын
this is not a comment, it is an offering to the almighty algorithm
@davidhorn57713 жыл бұрын
"Wasp" sounded puny to Hitler but he was OK with "Bumblebee?" 🤣
@maxkronader52253 жыл бұрын
Dont laugh unless you've been stung by both. The bumblebee has a significantly stronger and more painful sting than the average wasp. Although, I agree that a naming system based on something other than insects might have been more intimidating.
@kirgan1000 Жыл бұрын
@@maxkronader5225 Its not worse then Deacon, Priest and Bishop. Then we have Farmer.....(but that is a anti-tank gun)
@petermcquillan32982 ай бұрын
Bovington Tank Museum not have a wespe ?
@joek67912 жыл бұрын
Another example is in the US and used to be at APG
@Alex_Guy10113 жыл бұрын
I never knew that the Polish company that made tractors, Ursus, produced howitzers for the Germans during WW2.
@explorer1968 Жыл бұрын
Them Germans just needed more and more Wespes against overwhelming enemy counterparts, but never kept up...
@pavelgaming54703 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you mention the German self propelled artillery based on the char B1?
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Why would we? It's not significantly related nor that important. You can find an article about it on our website if you're interested.
@pavelgaming54703 жыл бұрын
@@TanksEncyclopediaYT thank you!
@Katniss2183 жыл бұрын
Hello there
@jakubvanek72503 жыл бұрын
General Kenobi
@PanzerdivisionWiking3 жыл бұрын
@13:24 is the Wespe in the front disabled? I can’t tell if the track is off on the rear
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
They are both disabled. I'd say they were either "killed" or abandoned and partly blown up.
@PanzerdivisionWiking3 жыл бұрын
@@ottovonbismarck2443 okay cool, thanks for the reply!
@matthewwaddington2777 Жыл бұрын
No wonder they lost! Can you imagine having to resource spare parts for all this stuff AFTER you’ve identified ‘what’s what’ in the supply chain😂!
@markstone55977 ай бұрын
nice.
@eugenet3142 Жыл бұрын
Ursus factory was and maybe still is located in Ursus, then near and now a borough of Warsaw, the capital of Poland, and not in Germany.
@off68485 ай бұрын
At that time there was no Poland
@dung2tranba134 Жыл бұрын
10.5 cm leFH 18M L/28 wespe cho tôi hỏi xuyên được bao nhiêu mm thép vậy
@huantruonginh294610 ай бұрын
52mm ở 500m khi dùng đạn xuyên thép, 105 -115mm khi dùng đạn HEAT nhé.
@mikepette44223 жыл бұрын
FAMO is just said Famo fa-mo also MP submachine gun is redundant as you are essentially calling it a submachine gun submachine gun. I think you mean to say MP40 SMG's Neat to hear about the attack by the T-34's I had not heard that one.
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Not everyone knows that MP=submachine gun. That is why it is good to say it.
@Modusoperandicod43 жыл бұрын
Hummel Next my dude!
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
We already have a very good article on the Hummel and we have no plans to rewrite it and make a video tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/hummel-spg-15cm-s-fh-181-sf-geschutzwagen-iiiiv-sd-kfz-165/
@WOTArtyNoobs3 жыл бұрын
Can you explain the subliminal photo at kzbin.info/www/bejne/q6jMnJmho5WtqZY
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Probably the video editor making a pun based on Sus (the shorthand for suspect from Among Us)
@Akren9053 жыл бұрын
Germans : ok so it needs to have a removable gun, it needs to be on a tank chassis, needs 360 degree aim Russians on milk trucks : dah, nine Fritz, mine *insert USSR anthem n a milk truck fly off a cliff firing* Also these SPG are in my ww2 board game n limited to 8 units. They do make a difference but planes = boom or real artillery.
@pavelalexe92543 жыл бұрын
At the beginning I thought he said Vespa lel
@AdamMann3D3 жыл бұрын
it's the same word.
@ppdntn1 Жыл бұрын
The Germans were maybe 20% mobilized, and often had inferior equipment. The cock on ejection 5 shot Mouser would hit one's face unless moved before cycling the bolt this meant having to regain one's aim each time, with notch sights. Stukas were obsolete when the war started, meat on the table for most any fighter. MK III Tanks had only a 50mm gun, the MK IV had a very short, low velocity 75mm (crews called the tank "the stub"). Both T 34, & Sherman outclassed these panzers. The FW 190, & BF 109 had very limited range. The Germans had too few transport aircraft that were already obsolete when the war began. There are many more instances of poorly designed weapons, but also major blunders by commanders that were not due to Hitlers meddling though that was another factor of bungling. The Germans went into Russia largely on foot, with horses, poor logistics, and as previously mentioned obsolete or poorly designed armor, aircraft, and other equipment. Hitler should have known from history (particularly Napoleon) the folly of fighting the Russians in the severely cold winters.
@0Turbox3 жыл бұрын
A 10,5cm on a tiny Pz. II chassis, let's be honest, more bang for the buck you can't get.
@danrees55163 жыл бұрын
I can’t listen to you and read at the same time please stop that otherwise good videos
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Then don't read. The captions are just describing the images, they're generally not needed for following the narration. Or, if you want to read, there's a big fat pause button at your disposal.
@Galvars3 жыл бұрын
You are unable to read and listen at the same time? What a peculiar disability.
@franciscofranco45203 жыл бұрын
"A den of devils..." at 4:20 is an entirely inappropriate commentary for a video on a particular type of German equipment. You might be trying to be politically correct, but just go back to your specialty, tanks and related equipment.
@Mate3973 жыл бұрын
Yea, really feels like censoring for the sake of political correctness...
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 жыл бұрын
Non esse consuetudinem Tank Encyclopedia accipere ab dictatorem conditionem
@maximilienlonca70063 жыл бұрын
And you had to rush to comment to protect their good name?
@ottovonbismarck24433 жыл бұрын
Said the man by the name of Generalissimo Franco, a fascist known for his dedicated understanding of human rights and democracy. Dig yourself a hole, get in it and have somebody fill it.
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
@@Mate397 That poor, miserable Schicklgruber thing there! Nobody likes it, not even its dog Blondie *. . .*