Tatiana’s Bach is dramatic, somber, bombastic. It stands out from the mainstream takes Gould, Schiff, etc. Very memorable.
@paulparoma2 ай бұрын
Those two are amateurs compared to Nikolayeva. The woman was a true genius, able to play any of the WTC at any time by heart, among other things. I had the great honor of meeting her, and quite a few lucky ones got to study with her.
I like everything about this recording - the tempos, the articulations, the sensitivity, the towering musicianship, which has always been Nikolaeva's trademark. She is SO convincing that after listening to her, it is hard to imagine and accept other interpretations. Deep, deep understanding and devotion to the composer. What an artist! I remember discovering her many, many years ago and gushing like a fanboy to my teacher. She just tilted her head, smiled, and listened to me for 5 minutes explaining why I love Nikolaeva and said:' But, of course..."
@butterflybeatles Жыл бұрын
I discovered Tatiana Nykolyeva, by accident, in a music store in Moscow (1980). The only word I could make out on the album cover, in Russian, was 'Bach'. Back in Canada I enjoyed many hours of The Goldberg Variations and forty-two years later, still believe her to be the best interpreter of Bach (with Simone Dinerstein coming in close behind).
@nannivito Жыл бұрын
❤❤
@taticoeur928510 ай бұрын
@@butterflybeatlesAmong other things I love her dignity and great culture I can feel
@paulparoma2 ай бұрын
@@butterflybeatles Simone Dinnerstein??? You have a wicked sense of humor. Saying she is a close second is like saying Baltimore comes in close behind Paris and Florence in architectural beauty.
@fritsvanderblom88812 жыл бұрын
Briljant! Genius! A lovely feminine way of playing the greatest master of all times!
@tomgouthwaite4989 Жыл бұрын
To give a live stream of Bach's counterpoint with such honest clarity, such laying aside of her own ego, is a profound gift from Tatiana for us all.
@baconkills859812 жыл бұрын
I think her tone is beautiful and the Capriccio is possibly the best interpretation that I have heard so far (and believe me, I have listened to a LOT of versions in preparation for my exam). She goes beyond the current trend of playing Bach as fast as possible and brings out each part perfectly. Her playing has a lovely gentle touch and a playful sound. To me it sounds like she understands what she is playing perfectly and has thought about the importance of every note.
@goscott4442 жыл бұрын
BFTP/ Before Tiffany Poon! 😁
@jansnauwaert17852 жыл бұрын
I agree. I for instance hate the speed at which Martha Argerich plays the Capriccio. Simply rushing it. Awful.
@Geopholus8 жыл бұрын
Tatiana Nikolayeva, is brilliant, warm, softly sweet, but strong, she always manages to bring out some mysterious poignant quality, in the music (if it is there), that I never would have noticed, if I hadn't heard her play the piece. Certainly there are many great interpreters of Bach,... and each has their wonderful qualities, but no one is quite like Tatiana !
@johnk81744 жыл бұрын
nicely said ("mysterious poignant quality")
@jorgeurzuaurzua40115 жыл бұрын
Tatiana is very much Russian. Perhaps this is why her Bach is warmer, more sentimental, notwithstanding her technical perfection. It must be her Russian soul showing.
@MichelineWalkerSherbrooke10 жыл бұрын
Cette interprétation touche la perfection.
@abandeli12 жыл бұрын
Very beautiful version. Rivalizes with Gould's version, although Gould plays faster. Mrs Nikolayeva plays softly and enhances the difference between the voices very clearly. In the Sinfonia, her left hand is extremely precise and clear. Very good impression of this masterpiece.
@Arateenteras2 жыл бұрын
The best interpretation I’ve heard so far magnificent.
@pacomaschio2 жыл бұрын
Not a simple pianista but a great musician
@ermilafragoulidou1049 Жыл бұрын
Η μόνη εκτέλεση που συγκινεί βαθειά .Bach ο ρομαντικότερος ολων
@marcorotondi76136 жыл бұрын
Sei dolce, Maestra Tatiana, quando devi esserlo....e forte altrimenti quando necessita. Una grande stupenda interpretazione. Al top direi. Marco Rotondi
@TheJamesalden10 жыл бұрын
There is none finer than this...Thank You!...
@azzurravittoriamoscia-comp29012 жыл бұрын
This is still the best interpretation i think!
@НадеждаБогданова-р7э3 жыл бұрын
Я всегда рада встрече с Татьяной Петровной. И,от музыки исполняемой ею и от неё самой исходит свет и тепло. Спасибо,Вам!
@MichelineWalkerSherbrooke10 жыл бұрын
This is perfection.
@soniagili4 жыл бұрын
perfecta interpretación!!!
@citizent69996 жыл бұрын
If I ever want to hear how a Bach piece would be played well before approaching it on the piano I will first turn to a Tatiana Nikolayeva recording for inspiration.
@gileschance9528 жыл бұрын
For me, Argerich sometimes carried away by her own brilliance and sometimes plays too fast and too loud with her steel fingers. I like Nikolayevich's interpretation because the music always comes first. Her tempos - like in the first part of the prelude - are convincing.
@Ennah087 жыл бұрын
I agree about Argerich - and with Bach I often go to the harpsichord to get the right feeling - Robert Hill, Scott Ross and others. But I find Tatiana Nikolayeva fantastic too!
@bach586112 жыл бұрын
this is RUSSIAN piano school. Best in the world!
@germancardoso35876 жыл бұрын
I QUITE AGREE WITH YOU !!!!
@Arateenteras2 жыл бұрын
Never the school or technique ..it’s the musician , so few..some play with virtuosismo and few do music and transmit …
@miamehela90312 жыл бұрын
Sometimes, but now is just Tatiana Nicolayeva.
@derinzehraerdem23 күн бұрын
THIS IS BETTER THAN SCHIFF!!!!!!!!
@ИгорьТрякин-м2я4 жыл бұрын
Красива во всём! В Бахе божественна.
@felix1892 жыл бұрын
Ist das eine fantastische Interpretation, sehr beeindruckend!
@Wasserleichee4 жыл бұрын
absolute stunning. russian piano school is indeed impressive
@fernandorangelpinheiro2544 Жыл бұрын
A great pianist
@udoschellin2843Ай бұрын
From Russia with Love ❤
@chrisczajasager12 жыл бұрын
one should hear Wanda Landowska in this , her favorite Partita, one which she played at her first concerts on her Pleyel clvecin more than a hundred years ago and recorded for RCA in her later years. The phrasing, the character of the dances and compositional issues undersrtood on a very higher level. She was a a composer which gave her another dimension in understanding.
@aivengochelidze6587 Жыл бұрын
Bravo
@frankteoh18 жыл бұрын
wonderful
@SpyVi12 жыл бұрын
the recording itself is very good. Stereo image, rounded bass, not muccing the tones, no unnessesary ambience. What we hear is Nikolayeva, rid of any recording engineering mistakes and quirks-and I find that beatiful. I cannot fult her for anything, because there is anything wrong. Much higher quality stuff than Gould,if you ask me.
@nikolaacimovic88548 жыл бұрын
perfect and correct interpretation
@psdesousa11 жыл бұрын
Rondeaux e capriccio best ever interpretation
@olgaangelo64111 жыл бұрын
Великолепно
@Lotuswhite29113 жыл бұрын
wonderfull~
@anderb93113 жыл бұрын
great stuff
@taurih6309 жыл бұрын
Almost perfect !
@hmol195511 жыл бұрын
SHE beats all!
@egetuncay75802 жыл бұрын
Better than Gould's version
@mariacristinagarulli48315 ай бұрын
ASSAI MIGLIORE...DEL CANADESE. FANTASTICA...
@ricardomandolini1224 Жыл бұрын
The best
@TheFugatto Жыл бұрын
Наконец --то я нашла настоящего исполнителя Партиты №2 , c - moll Баха.
@li-renyap91637 жыл бұрын
Hi. Could I have information on when this was recorded? Many thanks
@janyosef585811 жыл бұрын
I agree with psdesousa! I am impressed with Rondeaux and Capriccio. Best of the version I ever heard in the past 4 decades.
@marcsoucie40105 жыл бұрын
Now I realize Glen Gould was not the first one to interpret Bch the way he did.
@alexanderalenitsyn90533 жыл бұрын
Glenn Gould made his records of Bach's Partitas in 1956, and Nikolaeva did the same only in 1980. She was unknown in the West before the 1980's, so Glenn surely did not hear Nikolaeva, but Nikolaeva did hear him in 1957 as he visited the USSR. So, Glenn Gould was the first to interpret Bach the way he did. He was always absolutely original in his musical ideas and never copied anybody.
@elenakun93182 жыл бұрын
@@alexanderalenitsyn9053 , да, именно так !
@alexanderabc6296 Жыл бұрын
@@elenakun9318, у неё есть записи 50-х годов
@sprucetree4912 жыл бұрын
Sounds a little tinny to me but I'm listening on computer speakers. They did make some fine recordings in the 80s as well as in the 50s and even earlier. I agree with you about the ambience, and you might be right about the recording generally, with the proviso that one listens to it on good speakers.
@YannisFChatzis11 жыл бұрын
this version is almost as good as Goulds one!!! cannot get enough of listening..
@butterflybeatles Жыл бұрын
I despised Gould from the beginning. I worshipped Nykolyeva from the beginning.
@뒤끝30년3 жыл бұрын
💙
@tagaudi4 жыл бұрын
If only everybody played without ego
@aaronmichelson55109 жыл бұрын
A very fine musician and plays Bach respectfully. I definitely appreciate her left hand, which is sorely underwhelming in most pianists I hear trying to play Bach. I disagree with the tempo she has chosen for several of the movement, though I can see the appeal to some. It tended to drag too often and it was difficult for me to sit through everything without feeling ansy.
@arturozeballos18 жыл бұрын
que lento el capriccio...Arrau tbn...grandes ambos
@iamruslan-zf7up4zz3o5 ай бұрын
🙏💓🙏
@carlosjavierguzman15094 жыл бұрын
Bello sonido y equilibrados matices, pero le falta un poquito de la chispa de, por ejemplo, Argerich.
@qwe0712 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't some of that be due to the recording technology of the time? This is not a contemporary recording. I wouldn't fault her for not interpreting Bach as we do today.
@Whizzbizz9 жыл бұрын
Since I heard Martha Argerich play this, I'm getting somewhat bored of listening to any other rendition. Still I must say that this is perhaps a "strictly" personal judgment. I would never say that this one is inferior to Argerich's rendition. Every artist has their own style or understanding of the same piece of music and this rendition surely is not a bad one.
@leonelramos80698 жыл бұрын
+Whizzbizz its a bautifull interpretation
@MrElicottero8 жыл бұрын
+Whizzbizz Argerich plays Bach the way Argerich wants Bach played. And it's brilliant because she is a brilliant pianist. But this sort of elegant, dispassionate, intellectual Bach that Nikolayeva plays is the Bach we typically know. I find that I can enjoy them both in different ways. But Argerich's passion is close to my own temperament.
@chrisczajasager12 жыл бұрын
perhaps you might enjoy my entry of this and the 5th and 6th Partitas on Christopher Czaja Sager....You Tube....
@goscott4442 жыл бұрын
Tiffany Poon!😁
@darienescobar62837 ай бұрын
Brutal !
@sprucetree4912 жыл бұрын
'rivalizes'? Don't accuse this poor lady of rivalizing!
@internosil11 жыл бұрын
0:00 --> 23:29 OMG
@elot0072 жыл бұрын
7:45
@falernoducande196112 жыл бұрын
Bach non è Kandinsky come Fischer von Erlach non è Balakierev .........
@SpyVi12 жыл бұрын
computer speakers really kill critical listening. One does not need expensive speakers, or of impressive quality, but it's critical to take care to set up the speakers and the space itself. With proper speaker placement the sound improvement, mainly in the stereo image, is more than you would expect. Google speaker placement and experiment with a pair yourself-your favourate recordings will have some new "air", some newfound "thickness" to appreciate.
@jennyhirschowitz199914 күн бұрын
The persistent rubbish ads in between spoil everything…..
@elenakun93182 жыл бұрын
Может и хорошо исполнено... Если б не было Гленна! Почему НЕ ВОЛНУЕТ так, как исполнение Гленна Гулда?... Почему на фоне его игры любое исполнение звучит обыденно ? КТО проник в мир Баха так, как это удалось Гленну ?..
@chrisczajasager12 жыл бұрын
show 'us'?!! your family? not better , different: perhaps listen to my Partita 6 and 2 ..on 'our' You Tube/ nothing to 'show' only to hear and perhaps enjoy: Bach has had many diverse interpreters......too many "Popes'....
@giorgosmalefas17011 жыл бұрын
Gould, Gould, Gould, and Gould again!
@mohammadshahade87535 жыл бұрын
giorgos malefas yes!
@mikhailvichniakov41342 жыл бұрын
Not keen on his whining and self love. Nikolaeva is much better.
@chrisczajasager12 жыл бұрын
sounds like an anvil! and no understanding of the rhythmic structure: note-to-note....and what forced sonority.horrid