Full price for basically a cosmetic update is absolute waste. Also why they don't offer buttcaps with trap door and no different grip shapes is a big NO for me. Companies are too stubborn these days... -.-
@jerome_morrowАй бұрын
Lack of a trapdoor is just unacceptable these days. Especially with the QC lottery.
@agradinaАй бұрын
they dont make buttcaps because they dont alowed the foam to get exposed to air every time a noob want to open it.There is science behind racquets and integrity of racquets must be maintained so move ur preference to holow racquets if u wanted to open the buttcap.
@hybrid11theory75Ай бұрын
@@agradina Never heard so much BS in a single comment... you have absolute no clue what you're talking about. "Because they don't allow the foam to be exposed" LMFAO, there are tons of other foam filled racquets with trap doors...
@jerome_morrowАй бұрын
@@agradina Wow! Who knew the internal foam of a TF racket is hermetically sealed off?! Those airtight grommets must have cost a fortune to develop. LMAO. Even so, it’s hardly a major slog to leave the bottom 1 inch of the hairpin hollow so that some rebalancing weight can be easily added. Incidentally, how does a TF pro-stock hairpin work if there’s no space in the handle for silicone?
@TennissensitiveАй бұрын
A foam racket will never find the way to my bags
@daniel10sАй бұрын
Love the feel of tecnifibre racquets, but have never been able to use that grip shape. Hope they update them some day. Too many good racquets these days to have to deal with customizing the grip.
@tberry79Ай бұрын
Yeah, I think Babolat has the best grip type (for me at least)
@erikvo3232Ай бұрын
TF 40 305 vs radical mp vs blade 98 16x19? What do u prefer?
@jamsjerfyАй бұрын
great to see this! JUST got a used version of the last model OF the 315 cheaply in the meal, and i’m excited to try it out. coming from a pure aero 300 (weighted up to 340), which i like, but have always dreamed of playing a TF. loved my days with the pure aero 98, so i thought “for about $100 strung, why not?” thank you for all the content, but especially for pointing that the last iteration was also solid.
@randrothifyАй бұрын
Sounds exactly like what I am looking for which was a Blade 16x19 with more power. The head shape looks a little strangely not quite symmetrical which is something that I like o Wilson frames and will have to adjust to, but otherwise looks good. I can’t figure out for the life of me why Wilson or Head can’t make a modern control frame in a 98 head size with a bit more pop. It’s as if your choices are mutually exclusive: wet noodle control frame or power/spin frame at 100 square inches.
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Yeah, stiffer control racquets are my kind of jam, the RF01 from Wilson is good and the Radical MP is not bad in that respect either, to be fair.
@Anthony-lt8ww28 күн бұрын
Great review as always. One thing - you mentioned your SW being 330 on the 305. TW lists the avg SW at 320. Is yours really 10 pts higher without any modifications? Thx
@BurnsTennisАй бұрын
Jonas. I've been watching your videos for a few years now. Your footwork and stroke production has really improved. More smooth stroke production too. Nice work.
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Thanks!
@foodandtennisislifeАй бұрын
good to see you back on court 1!
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Home court :) hope all is well, Tom!
@brandomaxwellАй бұрын
Another informative review! One question: at 4:10 you comment the mold seems the same as the last gen. If this one's constant beam is 21.7mm vs. the last one's 22mm, doesn't that suggest a new mold?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
I think sometimes they round of the beam measurements, but if there was a mold update, it must have been very slight, and there has been no mention of it from Tecnifibre or retailers. So it is minimal, if any.
@brandomaxwellАй бұрын
Yes, that makes sense. They wouldn't be the 1st racquet maker to do such rounding. And, PS, I dig how you ALWAYS get into the specs and how they combine to affect the feel on-court. Thanks!
@vwmusicplaylist1935Ай бұрын
The extremely rectangular handle shape is a complete deal breaker irrespective of how good the racquet might be.
@stevenhowie4219Ай бұрын
Don't know why more people don't talk about the 315g version more. It's a great racket and much more head light which is great for one hand backhand.
@bodzio2304Ай бұрын
the best grip shape goes to... Wilson! v8 blade 100 ;)
@CentaurusRelax31428 күн бұрын
*I need help!* I have a 2012 Wilson Pro Staff Six 100, a 2013 Babolat Aero Pro Drive, and a 2024 Yonex VCore98. I had considered the Babolat to be my primary racquet, and didn't like the Yonex. But, in comparing them against a machine yesterday, the results (well-struck balls, in the court) turned out relatively even. But, the Yonex (98sq in) seemed like it had a smaller sweet spot, the Wilson always seems like it's much easier to get good contact with, but the Babolat has more spin. Not sure what to do. I'd love something with the stability/accuracy of the Wilson, but spin of the Babolat, and i don't know which way to turn-to a newer/different Wilson or to a newer/different Babolat. Unfortunately, i'm just on the other side of the US border, in Mexico, so i can't trial anything. Thoughts? Anyone? What i've been considering: This TF40, Wilson Pro Staff X, the Shift, or a current Babolat Pure Drive(?). I didn't even realize the Wilson was 'light' until this week. Maybe why it's better against slower balls and the Babolat is better against more pace/topspin. I'm 6'3", 210lbs, so i'm not for or against more or less weight in a racquet. But, the Wilson being light surprised me, since it seems to be the most 'stable.'
@JoxAtienzaАй бұрын
i currently have the TF40 18x20 305 (2022 version). I love it! what's a better upgrade: stick to the 18x20 2024 version or go with this 16x19?
@MarcO-q7t5xАй бұрын
Hi , another great review ! my question is : best racquets for a heavy flat hitter ? (i like to play power shots but super flat , expecially with forehand) I've seen lots of rewiew and I think Dunlop Cx 400 tour 2021 (that has a denser string pattern in the sweetspot than 2024) might be the right choice . What do you think ? There are other racquets that i should consider in that range (98-100 sq.head, and 295-310g unstrung) ? I've seen also Head Gravity Mp XL but maybe is too low in stiffness
@elmtree97Ай бұрын
I was a Volkl player that moved to TF40 315 18M.. I'm used to rectangular pallets with no trapdoor. Switching to the 1st Gen TF40 305 16M soon.
@thebeatАй бұрын
I already got the 18 x 20 because of your review of it a couple years ago. And now I will get the 16 x 19.
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
They are good bats!
@JoxAtienzaАй бұрын
pls let me know how it feels. i too have the 18x20 2022 305g. thinking if i should switch to 16x19
@LuisLunaTarazonАй бұрын
How does this racket compare to the Solinco Whiteout 305 16x19? On paper, this is the closest thing I've seen to that racket. My Whiteout came in way overspec with a 340 swingweight, but I don't mind that at all. My biggest problem is the launch angle. Are there any issues with the launch angle on the new TF40s?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
I felt like the TF40 is similar in many ways, but I never felt betrayed by the string bed while I did notice some hot spots on the Whiteout...
@RyanSheppardАй бұрын
edit: you mentioned there's no trap door. On my TF40 I had to drive nails into the foam in the handle to add weight. You have to take off the whole butt cap to do that
@JosephYoYoАй бұрын
Where can we find mold info for a specific racket? For example, which Radical MP models came with a mold change?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
This is a great question, Tennis Warehouse usually alerts about mold changes in the product info.
@Nit_PPАй бұрын
I have tf40 2022 and i considered to buy prince ats textreme 98 or the new one tf40, Which one do you recommend more?
@ArturAndriasian-TennisOnАй бұрын
What you think about TF 40 305 16x19(2022)? I try to choose between 16x19 and 18x20 tf 40 305. Is it controllable power on previous model 2022? I know that swingweight was so small..
@oakmountaingodАй бұрын
Been waiting on this one!
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Worth waiting for
@bibou929Ай бұрын
How different is the feel from the previous version ? I am worried about the 66 Ra
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Quite similar, did not feel any discomfort, but always a good idea not to string too high in terms of tension
@beam8544Ай бұрын
Something that I think you should talk about when reviewing rackets is how easily the grommets are replaceable. A super important feature in my opinion
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Good point, and thanks to the eyelets, these racquets are joy to string
@paulobraz6117Ай бұрын
Diadem Elevate V3 or TF40 16x19. Which do you prefer? Which provides better comfort, control and precision?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
TF40, the muted feel of the Diadem and some lack of power makes me choose the Tec. Comfort is similar
@googlereviewer1944Ай бұрын
Can Nicky Roen supply normal shaped pallets for these?
@johnbrondumАй бұрын
Another great review! A minor point of feedback, and maybe it is just me, but I find the leafy background can distract from the racquet. The new Prince racquets (with the camo paint job) would disappear completely 😂
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
I do like it, but I get your point!
@TheTennisDaddyАй бұрын
As a fellow crazy racquet guy, I might have to purchase this racquet, 13 racquets this year but my ocd tells me I need an even number to see out the year😉😂And I’ve never tried a Technifibre..I also always preferred 18x20 but really like the feel of the Extreme Tour/Pro with the dense 16x19 too
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
I know the feels
@Robust201319 күн бұрын
Dont worry what the haters say Jonas. Your voice is soothing 😎 missing Marbella weather right now 😎
@cmkchengАй бұрын
How does it compare to the Solinco Whiteout 305 ?
@abcd-fs2deАй бұрын
I like the grip from the Tecnifibre the most.
@allainangcao28Ай бұрын
Swingweights should be standardized to be lower stock due to quality control issues and customization purposes. Rarely do players nowadays use a racket and not customize to their specs.
@micah2237Ай бұрын
hmm, these specs are exactly the same as the solinco whiteout now...🤔 heard they were made in the same factory too. are these just the same racquet but different string density for the mains?
@tberry79Ай бұрын
Could be. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are rackets out there that are only cosmetic in difference.
@raytrace2014Ай бұрын
Hight swingweights on stock frames are very problematic. If you get an overspec one it becomes basically unplayable and you can't fix it. Brands should give us low swingweight frames that we can add weight to. They could even supply lead tape and instructions on how to do it to make clear to consumers that you should tune the racquet to your taste.
@kkarxАй бұрын
Absolutely! I got Speed Pro with SW 340 and it is killing my shoulder.
@matiasrivas5567Ай бұрын
I just dont see this new models at the TW website. Do you??
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
No, strangely only in Europe right now
@samburrell3288Ай бұрын
I had the T-Fight, I played great with it, it was like a sledgehammer but it destroyed my elbow, once I stopped playing with it, the pain stopped too
@agradina8 күн бұрын
My shoulder in my case rip t fight 305
@agradina8 күн бұрын
U always prefer 18x20 vs 16x19.strange u didnt test 18x20 also
@googlereviewer1944Ай бұрын
Flat handle shape is a no no👎
@jeroenfrijhoff8392Ай бұрын
Nice review! Once I noticed it though, it was difficult to look past your shirt logo that’s missing an ‘r’ 😬
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
This was a bit of an easter egg :D
@kimlucas9005Ай бұрын
How does it compare to t fight 305 ?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Softer, longer dwell time in the string bed, lower SW
@peejread2309Ай бұрын
How does it compare to the pure aero 98?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Less power, more control. Lower launch angle
@ivandean1Ай бұрын
don't like the handles on TF. Too square
@christianbuechi4555Ай бұрын
where‘s the tweener at 3:33 my friend?
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Not talented enough :)
@christianbuechi4555Ай бұрын
@@Tennisnerd so humble
@steveurmahАй бұрын
I'm playing the older TF40 16x19 and obviously like it. But one issue I have to warn about is that the quality control for my four frames was quite a big issue. One was goldilocks, two were very light (fixable) and one was unplayable for me with a super high swingweight.
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Yeah, this is the issue with foam-filled racquets, swing weights can be all over the place.
@cesarelodesani1384Ай бұрын
Volkl racquets too don't have trapdoor
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Yes, you are right and they also have a quite rectangular grip
@bojack382711 күн бұрын
Potentially great racquets ruined by the ridiculous handle shape
@Christiancsilva13Ай бұрын
Had a pair of the 2019 version. Loved it and played so well with it, but it wrecked my wrist 😢. Foam filled rackets really put up some extra weight in the frame and it feels heavier than the swingweight suggests.
@xPocketStaffАй бұрын
Tecnifibre T-fight 2024 ?thx
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
I think next year
@meinsouzaАй бұрын
tecnifibre has been pushing out great rackets lately
@TennisnerdАй бұрын
Agreed
@curiousgeorge6921Ай бұрын
Angel or this ?
@christophmayer2434Ай бұрын
I would never ever buy a racket without a trap door. But i played the old TF0 for testing and i kind of liked it. just sad that they do such a stupid thing.
@samburrell3288Ай бұрын
tecnifibre grips are too round like a sausage. The best ones are wilson, babolat and yonex. Head is also too round
@TennissensitiveАй бұрын
A foam racket will never find the way to my bags
@tberry79Ай бұрын
Why not? I’m genuinely curious because I’ve never tried one, but I’ve considered it. What do you dislike about them?
@TennissensitiveАй бұрын
@@tberry79 imo the muted feeling and the risk, that this material has been uneven, unbalanced injected.
@danielsteckАй бұрын
Nice raquet... but shit quality control... specs are all over the place for those.... good for the bin