🌗 Tesla's ETHER vs. ATOMISM 🌎

[@tomladdus9264]

Found this Tesla quote on Ether “According to the adopted theory, first clearly formulated by Lord Kelvin, all matter is composed of a primary substance of inconceivable tenuity, vaguely designated by the word “ether.” The atom of an elementary body is differentiated from the rest of this substance, which fills all space, merely by movement, as a small whirl of water would be in a calm lake. “All matter, then, is merely whirling ether. By being set in movement, ether becomes matter perceptible to our sense; the movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state and becomes imperceptible. If this theory of the constitution of matter is not merely a beautiful conception, which in its essence is contained in the old philosophy of the Vedas, but a physical truth, then, if the ether whirl or atom is shattered by impact or slowed down and arrested by cold, any material, whatever it be, would vanish into seeming nothingness, and, conversely if the ether be set in movement by some force, matter would again form. Thus, by the help of a refrigerating machine or other means for arresting ether movement and an electrical or other force of great intensity for forming ether whirls, it appears possible for man to annihilate or create at his will all we are able to perceive by our tactile sense." - Nikola Tesla “Shows How Men Of The Future May Become As Gods.” NEW YORK HERALD . December 30, 1900.

[@andresrogersa]

They wanted to 'debunk' the aether to disprove the spiritual, so they invented "relativity". When "relativity" didn't work they invented "special relativity". When that didn't work they invented "quantum mechanics". The theory of unicorns and leprechauns is getting closer and closer.

[@donkerheid]

And when that didn't work, they invented string theory, and when that didn't work they said we might have to give up the notion that physics can say anything meaningful about the world or predict anything anymore.

[@andresrogersa]

@@donkerheid right I forgot string theory which is just a copy of the kabbalistic tree and the sephirots. Physics can be anything now you can identify yourself as a wave or a particle.

[@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin]

I’m trans. I formerly identified as particles. Now I identify as waves.

[@tesakun3133]

Correct. Those Cabal corrupted the science.

[@lwangaoyedokou7264]

@@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin 🤣🤣🤣

[@jackblevel8296]

Eric Dollard had it all figured out, he also knew that the Sun is not a solid ball of anything and is not a Nuclear furnace.

[@jackblevel8296]

I agree, they are not what we are told. I highly doubt they are in an infinite vacuum either.

[@Marty59143]

The secret to success is denying the aether to profit from the sale of mechanical medium.

[@justsaying.8017]

Ah, got me in tears. Profound, simple. I have no scientific language, not much education but you say everything I’ve always felt to be true. More so these days. This stuff never leaves my head. Wish I knew everything you know. Fantastic💖

[@shaespear407]

Just Saying You may enjoy this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHqbd3ymedWBnZo AETHER by Marcia Ramalho

[@justsaying.8017]

@@shaespear407 thanks. I had watched this, tartarian(?) info a few years ago. Still in the process of rearranging my brain. from exploding🙃 😶.

[@isacvlad]

100% BASED as always! Thank you sir.

[@omekafalconburn9202]

Wow! That analogy with the side ways droplets was actually brilliant well done Ken.

[@roberthelms1737]

"Let there be light" is a much more inclusive statement than we were led to understand.

[@sojourner-kl6ei]

Yes! By the creating power of God's voice; His spoken word, - there was light.

[@Kauzi108]

I would have stayed in school if I had an awesome teacher like you. Some teachers just suck the inquisity out of subjects by voiding the spirit of it. You are tenable sir.

[@megaanderson97]

The water droplet analogy is PERFECT. Thanks for this video!

[@tiggywink1]

I'm so glad I found your channel. I need to tell Roger Spurr over at Mudfossil University about you. He has been shooting a laser through a vortex and shown some interesting phenomena that He is working hard to explain. Academia is rejecting most of his stuff...That probably means he is on to something...He could definitely use your input....You are gifted, Ken...Your examples and explanations make me feel like a kid again...A 10 year old...lol...

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

well arent you sweet

[@sydthegoat88]

Awesome meditation, I could listen to a mechanic talk about cars all day long

[@gyro5d]

Light travels in perturbations of Aether field area. When the perturbations of Aether contacts a denser medium/material. It widens its area and shortens its depth, same area. Widens cause sound is faster in denser mediums. Light is sound in the perturbating Aether field. So it expands faster than its depth. When leaving the denser medium into a less denser medium it first expands in depth. Then less area is left for the width, keeping with the original area. Area speeds up the perturbations of the Aether field.

[@RyanMiddleton_the_Rhino]

That explains the Venturi effect.

[@gyro5d]

@UniversalExpanse Compression, bounce off the Inertial plane FLASH (so called Photon), Rarefaction, Compression, FLASH/Photon, Rarefaction ... To see this, The Slo Mo Guys, "Light at 10 trillion FPS".

[@gyro5d]

@UniversalExpanse ; I see it as incoherent Aether field (+), into coherent Aether field (×). Caused from the initial vibrations. Learned Field Theory from Ken, over the last 6 years.

[@StuggleIsSurreal]

So, we "create" a direct current on a wire (waveguide) only because we think electricity is flowing in the wire (it's not). The very way we "generate" electricity has to change before we make the next breakthrough in batteries or power generation?

[@lorenpriest7604]

I've seen pictures of the coaxial compression ring from a jet when it breaks the sound barrier. It looks like your Basho puddle flipped on its side!! Again glad to see that you weren't blown away by a tornado!!🙃

[@kekmojo4592]

This is my favorite episode. Validates many of my own beliefs and experiences.

[@LupinFootballDevelopmentClub]

Hello from Niagara Ken! Love the simple explanation. I have two boys that ask many questions. Your illustrations not only help me see these principles in my mind’s eye, but help me point out parallels to them while journeying out into nature. So when they meet the hairy arm pit chick dressed in a hemp skirt with mud on her feet, they don’t treat her with disrespect.

[@marywright4934]

Hey, lol I was a smart bar waitress and bartender. No offense taken. I watch your videos first thing in the morning. Starts my day off right

[@fexus9730]

They explain the light slowdown within glass by photons bouncing back and forth between the atoms of the glass before eventually finding a way out. Complete lunacy.

[@jimmyloe7780]

Good to hear from you after learning about the tornadoes. I was wondering.

[@LilyGazou]

I was also concerned.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

ohh im ok here in lexington :)

[@tomfallon8497]

Here's a crazy thought. Read Maxwell's poem on Direction. For Maxwell is confused by the source of lines of force , all he knows is they have a direction which he calls mysterious. Magnitude ,the other component to a vector is absent. Hmmm?? lines of force without magnitude? pure direction

[@wolverwolf108]

Unbelievable how simple it its, the secret of the universe. Finally a theory of everything that makes SENSE.!!! 🙏🙏🙏

[@globeeartheulogy9126]

An excellent example of Occam’s razor is geocentricism,…. Just we aren’t wizzing spinning orbiting through dark matter dark energy and bending space -time! Total nonsense !! Love your work Ken ! Thanks for the great video 💕

[@spadeoblades4016]

Ohhhhh.. so the electric field and the gravitational field meet at a right angle while electrostatic current flows perpendicular betwixt the two.

[@rickyseedo4067]

This is the kind of video that you Excell at, and why I keep coming back. 👍

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Happy to hear that!

[@Jubba26]

Merry Christmas]!!, thx for the video's and keep em coming.

[@AstralApple]

Where does a neutron exist when looking at a supercell? I'm looking at the plane of inertia thinking it would be there or something, but I don't know what to look for. I'm reading your book trying to understand.

[@betauser6233]

Would be nice if you could explain the two slit experiment with this view of matter and then start explaining simple atomic equations with waves. Just trying to understand better and most of the videos on your channel seem to use the same 5 pictures and repeating the same statements.

[@DieFoe]

He did that already.

[@chrisjet10001]

I hope mankind wakes up soon to all the lies... but we are all too distracted with simple minded bs. Serfdom we remain.

[@dianawalker9320]

so are there electrons ? or are they imagined ?

[@sedigives]

Explain this too a 12 year old and not only do they get it, their input and questioning is awesome! The pool is full of liquid and so everywhere in the pool the liquid is in contact with. Smack the surface and the liquid perturbates. It's not travelling, yet the wave does, the liquid just moved up and down. The Aether is what the wave exists on or in. It's the tracks being layed as the train moves across them and is part of the train. Pressure is the best way to describe most of this. I have a hard time visualizing gravity, although just like Magnetism, there's a point and we move to it, not in a straight line and it's there and how Magnetism can be controlled is the key I believe. and by the way, Ken is correct! People diagnose electronics everyday without understanding basic electrical theory. You can't figure out a schematic based on the flow of atoms and weather they flow from ground or from positive polarity or is it outside the insulator or not? It's there and only moves when extended. It never flows. Charging a magnet is not motion, charging and discharging a magnet can cause motion and does. Instant action at a distance is because the Universe is the pool and everything is everywhere and time is only a duration measurement that we made up and know we screw that up too?

[@TXLorenzo]

Ken, where can I get a copy of your frequency diagram displayed on your computer?

[@theegrittybuddha]

I always said Quantum was the modern day word for magic

[@TheIgnoramus]

Ok…so…is the only thing holding them back is measuring at the Planck scale? If that’s the case we’re a decade away from them having to accept it I guess. Kindof begs the question what “aether” is though.

[@coleb7644]

any chance I can buy your xpro-2 / 35mm voightlander combo?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

i dont have my XPRO2 anymore

[@michaelsmith957]

Am looking for info on relationship between sound vibrations and magnetism if you can let me know. Thanks

[@karltooley7034]

My string question as far as the speed of light. If you had a string that was 10 light years long a d you pulled one end would it take ten years for the other end to move?

[@daroniussubdeviant3869]

i've been testing my understanding of the metaphysics you teach in a group called 'quantum physics' on social media. from my experience it seems that half of the members have come to the same conclusions. what separates them from the others predominantly is that they explain themselves simply in their own words yet they all say the same thing. the ones that think the planck length is the smallest thing tend to say the same things in the same words. i dunno if that is anything to go by, lol. i'll keep listening and follow the logic to see if it holds.

[@daroniussubdeviant3869]

i am an aether condensate. :O mind blown. lol

[@daroniussubdeviant3869]

outstanding work. brilliant analogy well presented. thank you.

[@chrisbova9686]

@@dsm5d723 numbers are related to radii. The 3,4,5 triangle is the beginning of a continuing sequence. Cut radius 6 with radius 6, and... You're all 6s and 7s. Cut radius 8 with 7.

[@tomaskoptik2021]

The key lies in discontinuity/noncausality/stillness vs. continuity/causality/movement. Plancks length means tapping into the ether (counter-space), into omnipresent everexistent (noncausal) stillness. Universe is not 16 billion yrs old, it is 16 bilionths of a second old. The true age of the Universe is NOW. To grasp the topic you need just one question answered honestly: "What is movement?" If they cannot answer WHAT is movement do not take them seriously :) Understanding nature of movement solves it all...

[@chrisbova9686]

@@tomaskoptik2021 it was there, now it's effin here, am I making myself clear?

[@rob-2037]

"the secret to success is working at the patent office"

[@RickBeck82]

For 38 years Einstein was a scientific god no matter what circles (science spiritual) of people I was talking too. No one ever questioned his theories in any way. It was just accepted and understood that space is a physical thing that can expand and contract and from that birth gravity. It was never taught that Newtonian mechanics were obsolete under Einsteins model either even though it's both incorrect and obsolete. It's my understanding that newton considered the F in F =MA as both the cause and the effect. While Einstein concocted the idea that time is a thing that can be bent. So like I said I'm 39 and for 38 of those years I never once heard anyone question either of them. I'm sensing a paradigm shift in understanding reality. Or maybe I'm just REALLY dumb and never looked in the right places, that's possible too.

[@shaespear407]

Rob - Brilliant! 👏👏👏 And? Please continue. I think you hit the nail right on the inception of that deception.

[@ChazZen]

17:53 so is all light perpendicular to the initial vector of energy released or is it paralell/longitudinal? when electrons change energy levels in an atom does the light get released in all directions or out from the sides, perpendicular to that electrons motion?

[@kurtm3069]

Nice explanations! So for understanding what you said the dielectric of a magnet would be the ether swirling in to a vortex and making it's field?

[@theronimisha]

You could do some videos about grammar, logic and rhetoric. You seem to own these subject pretty well, and we could use a few simple instructions.

[@Jon-to6969]

Of all the times you have said "I'll edit that out of this video" I don't think I've ever seen a single cut or edit in any of your videos ever hahaha

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

heheheeheh

[@jeffreymortag52]

Excellent explanation and clarification of their blathering of other words. Also I saw the omega over your shoulder😂😂😂😂👍😊

[@rappinron1384]

Can someone please explain what the sun is made out of? It's a ball of the fundamental particle? Is the sun the rock in this example?

[@wd91]

Thunderbolts project (electric universe crowd) just released a video talking about feilds and aether actually i know u guys dont align 100% but are far closer to eachother than the mainstream beliefs! And both far closer to reality IMO

[@kingdomcome1617]

Love the Thunderbolts project and the EU model/s, not because they are correct on every assumption but because they have created a worthy challenge to the status/static quo within science. Science needs to be challenged or we are all in big trouble (as seen with this corovid nonsense).

[@porkberries4496]

Does all mass have an unperturbed aether equivalent? If mass is unpacked will it expand into the aether? Is mass a zit mother nature wants to pop?

[@jrfeichtner]

Thank you Ken! 🙌 Was probing you a little in the live stream for this video!

[@rolandsharp]

You said that time does not exist and is only a measure of magnitudes. Can you please go into that further. Magnitudes of what? thanks

[@menachemporter5367]

You could think of Time as an accounting of physical phenomena in a given finite place. Since any physical existence excludes any other physical existence in the same place, one must follow the other. Hence chronology and time

[@galactock]

Magnitudes of pressure mediations which are also causing what's been labeled gravity...

[@rolandsharp]

@@galactock how does a watch measure a pressure mediation?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

time is mass and magnitude, remove the hands from the watch, what "TIME" is it at the center? NO TIME

[@tracyvale9011]

Love this lesson so much. so what is the cause of movement to create the movement what is the rock?

[@kamsinmirchandani]

Sometimes I’m like I don’t know what to believe anymore. Why hide the ether. I mean I know why. But now I have so many years of catching up to do and unlearn things I know from school.

[@peanutdudeboiledpeanuts971]

Thanks for all the information and insight. Could you do a CGi video of how you “see” light and the ether? Maybe a you, a friend or a fan could do the cgi video based on how your minds eye sees it. Thanks. Either way, Shine on! Dude💫

[@magneticflux7833]

I say I really needed this today. Late to the party usually... That's me..

[@LivingTheDream369]

He is so smart that he added ink to his blood.

[@Katonje]

Thank you Ken. Everyone should watch this video. This is absolutely fundamental, and you convey it so eloquently. I really appreciate your content, it is truly valuable. God bless you.

[@Hold_the_Front_777]

14:50 You didn't edit it out. Just thought I'd let you know lol.🤣🥰

[@charliejg]

Hey, was thinking about you listening to the news about all of the tornados. Crazy.

[@joshuabradford86888]

I check out your videos every so often, and i am glad i did today. Dig what you are putting down Dude. I'm not into your camera videos, but it's all good just not my thing.

[@reitze01]

After watching I'm wondering about the directional nature of "photons", lasers, light through any medium. Vs sound being partly directional. Vs your water drop omnidirectional. Would enjoy our response. Thanks!

[@nordhaven]

Is the density of the either the same all through the universe?

[@trevorstrope4549]

The rational of combustion is-fire and friction remove elementary matter from bodies, the expanding medium enters the vacated interstices and causes dissolution ; during which elementary matter is set free which promotes different sensations, such as a light, colour and heat, and we impute to the cause of these sensations the heat and moon essence excited in the mind. Hello teacher Ken I am struggling to understand or I guess visualize the act of the expanding medium creating the sensation of heat any advice to help?

[@majfauxpas]

Santa’s sack of infinite holding… untenable, yet if you pump enough energy into a field like they do at CERN, things start popping out. Or not things, points at intersection of fields?

[@scottburris9842]

Thanks...awakening from ignorance...enjoyed your snarky smartazz style too

[@joeshmoe000]

Can you go into more detail on why it is like a coaxial cable? One thing I find very interesting about actual literal coaxial cables is that you can send waves with a much longer wavelength than the spacing between the conductor and the ground/shell. You would think those waves would all radiate outside the cable cause their wavelength is longer.

[@asafrashid5051]

Thank you for your priceless teachings Ken, kind regards, Asaf

[@anthonypautin]

Thanks for using the rock again! 🤙🏼

[@MartinEnderlin]

🙏🙏🙏Frohi Wynachta 🇨🇭 Ken ❣️🙏🙏🙏

[@mattdugas]

If no force, what of barometric pressure?

[@sebastienloyer9471]

You are 1 of my god's. Love your energy and I am like a child so ...

[@amarco7453]

nice and concise presentation. are the water droplets traveling or is it instantaneous action?

[@edgewyze7352]

Hey Wheelie! Does the earth orbit the sun?

[@fpvangel4495]

Nice Ken, i dont think anyone can word it as good as that really, bit more to go yet. :)

[@Derangolicious]

Ken, what's your take on the electric universe theory? You familiar with it?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

nothing to do with them

[@aaabeverages7152]

Thunderbolt chan.,had a confusing EU episode. Mixed particles, gravity, atomism, etc...

[@gheffz]

Love this! Thank you! So many truths!

[@SurfAddict]

Thank you Ken!

[@NESoldier]

Excellent representation of pressure mediums observation

[@annadeblasis3665]

Fantastic!!! Thank you

[@ash_bordeaux]

As regards instantaneous action at a distance, Tesla said “action and reaction are coexistent.” - even when it appears you’re in the fairgrounds hall of mirrors.

[@THMAS-jq4wz]

С Рождеством

[@stevemartin4249]

Hi from Japan, Ken. Yep ... I agree with you regarding 'ether' vs. 'quanta'. Back in undergrad (biology, UNC-W) ... I came across a little book called 'Adventures of Ideas' by Alfred North Whitehead, the co-author with Bertrand Russell of the 'glorious failure' of 'Principia Mathematica'. Wittgenstein soon had Russell wrapped around his little finger with his ladder in the Tractatus ... but Whitehead went in another direction, describing 'reality' as 'process' as opposed to atomistic reductionism. Other mathematicians thought Whitehead had gone bat-shit crazy, and that was before bats were blamed for the plandemic. A lot of water has passed under the bridge since my Cheech and Chong stoner days at UNC-W, but listening to your description of the waves emanating from a stone thrown into water, I recalled Whitehead on process, and then my fondness for emergence theory, and closely related fractal theory and chaos theory. I have since fallen in love with mandelbrot sets as a kind of dynamic totem for 'reality' .... and like the waves emanating from the stone thrown in the water, those pretty seahorse, scepter, and elephant valleys, see a mathematically generated model of those ripples through the water of 'reality'. One thing really has me puzzled. Do you think there is a genetic component to those who intuitively drawn towards dynamic processes and ether verses those who are drawn towards granular, quantifiable reductionist theories? Maybe it's a bit like 'paint by numbers' or 'guitar by tab scores' vs the vague freedom of French Impressionist paintings or the spontaneous expression of feeling by the likes of John Coltrane or Miles Davis. That reminds me of a couple of funny quotes, one attributed to Louis Armstrong or Duke Ellington ... 'If you gotta talk about it, you ain't there.' Kind of a zen thingy. The other, attributed to a whole bus load of artists ... 'Talking (writing) about music is like dancing about architecture.' The tornadoes running through Kentucky made prime time news here in Japan. Damn, when it comes to troubles ... when it rain, it pours. Just this week, I was buried in Susan Sontag's 'Illness as Metaphor' about how tuberculosis, cancer, and AIDs have been used as point of reference for social identity and governments. It doesn't take much imagination to connect the language of disaster with social identity and governments ... both real and metaphorical. I agree with you about the other thing. These socio-economic-political ripples are about to come crashing down as a tidal wave upon humanity. Take care buddy.

[@blacksquad2160]

Caduceus coil makes scalar wave and antigravity on charge rotating.. Can you comment caduceus coils?

[@oguardiaodosaber]

Feliz Novidade!

[@sethnewsome7368]

Georgetown Ky boy here! I tell my friends about these concepts and how mainstream scientism is nothing but a religion today but they can never see it! Why can nobody seem to see these fallacies??? I really want to know!!!

[@Phaze-rb3mp]

Ok so we start at a point (0th dimension) at the center of the torus. Emanation moves outward in a hyperboloid shape in 1D and 2D to be the surface of the hyperboloid, which wraps around itself to form a 3D torus, space/time. So 3D or form or magnetic field is the female, the receiver/acceptor of potential energy moving outward from counterspace. The female 'womb' (rounded) forms physical reality (earth/water). They both 'fall' to gravity cuz they seek counterspace (male). Male/yang is counter space (point-y shapes, like 1D lines which are immaterial/mental) or hyperbaloid (kinda like a pyramid). Male is fire/air, which are mental. Less then 3D are still just mental which float up toward the 2D surface of the torus, the nonmaterial 'male' mind. The 2D surface of the torus is the holographic plate, where the information/data is, which came from the center. To create a holographic projection inside the torus, we need a reference beam orthogonal to the torus surface (holographic plate) to make the projections inside the torus. The fractal enables this via torus within a torus. The point on the surface of the torus where perception takes place is called the Assemblage point (ive perceived from there, so i know its correct). We can develop power to move the assemblage point and change what we perceive holographically since the data is different at each point. By the way, this 2D surface is the holographic limit for the amount of data or resolution possible within a volume, which is a lot. the ALL (aka god) would then be the male + female or hyperbaloid + torus = sphere ! the one. that sphere is fractally the same thing as the point in the center. So, I guess, the 0 point (or the sphere) is 'God'/source, the male is that which extends out from there (like the sun =son of god = male). That then inverts itself to form the female and tada !! lol Anyone can add to this or point out any errors. And thanks so much Ken for giving me some key pieces of the puzzle for me to put this together like above.

[@stephengalvin]

I was beginning to think I might be missing something vital which the atomists had spotted. Thank you for putting this out. Now I know I am not alone. Are we Etherians? Could you put out a reading list when you have a moment, please? Thanks for making these videos.

[@RUMP3LST1LT5K1N]

Came for the science, found the centre does hold. It's not a balancing act at all.

[@donkerheid]

I just watched the newest video from the electric universe folks. The dude was speaking about ether particles... Geez.

[@galactock]

I was into the EU until I saw Kens video about light and matter being one. It's inevitable they will complete the connection and see the hydrogen recycling infinite universe of magnitude arising from ether aka Pure Potential >*

[@shaespear407]

Donkerheid Since you are in the flow, you may enjoy this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHqbd3ymedWBnZo AETHER by Marcia Ramalho

[@donkerheid]

@@galactock I actually like the EU. It is fascinating when they analyze planetary and galactic phenomena in this new light, not to say when they predict them correctly. That old notion that what's going on in the cold and empty space is some geology and nuclear fusion has to go. But they badly lack field theory, this is very clear. Thornhill might not be very far from this, by the way. If only he abandoned the idea that ether is some kind of 3D carpet of neutrinos filling space.

[@donkerheid]

@@shaespear407 Thanks, I'll look into it. I suggest you look up Ibrahim Karim.

[@galactock]

@@donkerheid I agree, If EU "scientists" looked into the metaphysics of cosmology to the extent Ken has, understanding ether isn't a particle and such, they also could have explained what a black hole is, identifying the recycling nature of hydrogen being what combines into all the other elements which are then being ejected from them in cosmic jets from black holes back into hydrogen. That being why our universe is and always will be expanding ~ Plasma is just a compound of the rest of the process... the way I'm interpreting it. Ken has completely dismantled big bang bumping particle notion using their own terminology . I'm always learning more form Ken, it's exciting and inclusive of all we see happening in the biggest picture >H

[@tommichejda2440]

Such a great talk Sir. As clear and simple as it gets. I just finished reading "the metaphysical principles of the infinitesimal calculus" by R. Guénon which is an ok book as he grasp the fallacies of the modern profane science. Your video makes it much clearer.

[@lowercase18]

Interesting how the man who created calculus, is also the same man who modern science attributes gravity to.

[@006hetzkin5]

Bang on Ken! I'll mention more later. Thank you.

[@creativename5294]

Hi from Australia Ken. Thank you for another great video. Wishing you wellness. I came across a question which I cannot answer and I am wondering if you could do a video on it. Why is it that when you climb a mountain the air gets colder but when in an enclosed space like an indoor room when the heater is on the hot air rises? How come hot air doesn't rise like that in our atmosphere?

[@pavlovssheep5548]

if light behave like a physical object , when it enters a glass of water , it would slow down and compress like a spring,. then when it leave the glass and compressive pressure removed , it would catapult back to original speed . alternatively light is not traveling under it's own power, but is being pulled/attracted by an unknown force or gradient . is light attracted to darkness

[@mte874]

Very nice video, thank you!

[@royledford5673]

UNICORN TOES are "quantum". My barmaid understood perfectly : )

[@RyanMiddleton_the_Rhino]

So what is the ether equivalent of dark matter?

[@BrentLeVasseur]

Hey Ken while I totally agree with you on the Aether vs. Atomist debate, nevertheless I think particle physics is a necessary abstraction as it allows us to more easily describe complex interactions that are not so easily described using the Aether model. Richard Feynman once said that all of chemistry can be described using particle physics (which is true). Except that doesn’t mean that Chemistry is no longer a useful branch of science as it is a more simplified abstraction of the underlying particle physics that allows us to make stuff quicker. I think the same can be said for Aether physics vs. Particle Physics. While I totally agree that Aether physics is the lowest common denominator of science - as in everything in nature is Aether based, that doesn’t necessarily mean that we should completely do away with particle physics all together, in that the abstraction of particle physics allows us to do stuff and make stuff that wouldn’t be as easy (in some cases) to work with in the Aether model. Where particle physics does us harm is when it becomes dogmatized into a religion that needs to be “defended” which hinders our scientific growth. To that end, Einstein has done great damage in that relativity has created some false dogmas (like the speed of light being the maximum speed limit of the universe) that has hindered our scientific growth as a species. If it were not for Relativity and atomistic dogma, we would probably be flying around in faster than light spacecraft today, instead of wasting our time on KZbin complaining about the dogmatic stagnation of science. lol

[@mikeofallon]

But if particle physicists are teaching a necessary abstraction or analogy, they should say so. If a new particle is needed to make the math work, they "discover" one -- with all the necessary properties.

[@BrentLeVasseur]

@@mikeofallon Yeah but the problem with the Aether model is that it lacks the rigor and support of the general science community. While conceptually I know that what Ken is saying is probably accurate, there are no formulas, experiments and scientific peer reviewed papers to back it up. Meanwhile you have QED which is the most accurate formulation of light ever, which can accurately predict it’s behavior down to 32 decimal places. That’s the kind of rigor that the Aether model needs to beat before it becomes generally accepted as a replacement for the particle/atomist model.

[@billthomas2431]

I get it but I can't explain it as well as you and that bothers me. I try using the water analogy to explain the aeather. But I don't think some people understand what I'm trying to explain. It's harder for me explain to my kayak fishing friends than do lobster and crabs think that fish fly ¿

[@CosmicFrequency9]

How would you describe sound ?

[@2dazetake]

You make us feel more intelligently designed then we are worthy of though Ken 🤣👍

[@tjcurran6041]

Love your channel, but I think after watching these obnoxiously long ads I think I deserve to request that you now propose a testable theory for free energy generation (or conversion). While the world thinks crypto is the answer to freedom it pales in comparison to what free energy can accomplish. It's been conjectured that free energy devices from the past generated it from the aether via an antenna-like structure utilizing mercury and (potentially) gold. Up to the task?