2019 Hyundai Elantra SEL 2.0L (147 HP) TEST DRIVE

[@JosedVS1]

GREAT VIDEO!! WELL EXPLAINED WITHOUT THE NEED TO SPEAK, AND SHOWING THE VEHICLE AT NIGHT

[@CristianP]

Naturally aspirated engine ! 💪 Very reliable choice ! 🏆

[@irielouhenriette2254]

The test drive is perfect

[@Fromrish]

Is there any front camera?

[@alvaroosorio8690]

Quiero saber si los Elantra SEL tienen sistema ECO

[@Золотой-л3ф]

Сколько моделей в этой элантра?

[@davidcasas3862]

Those consumption numbers can't be well. I think this engine is indirect injection and find a 2.0 l.engine with 3.1 liter at 80, 4,2 at 100 and 5 l at 120 is almost impossible unless the measurement is done in a downhill. More, with a 6a. gear of almost 50 km/h each 1000 rpm and 178 Nm of torque you can imagine the continuos dance of the gearbox....good review!!!!!

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

we always test on flat road, we did do from West Kaiserslautern to near Waldmohr Autobahn Exit, this testing road is 25 km long and maximal +/- 10 meter altitude from 25 km road distance! :) and we try test fuel without windy weather! Up to maximal 10km/h wind speed :) you can check it out on Google Earth or special Maps where you can check the Altitude Sea level that you can know if the road is flat or light downhill for long distance that you think its flat, but we always check the road when we are in another area :)

[@davidcasas3862]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK well, I'm totally amazed. This engine must be the most economic N/A 2l. engine of all the times!!!! ;)

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

But we are not sure if the computer telling us right numbers, but it can be up to +1 liter real fuel usage than computer telling us

[@davidcasas3862]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK it would be still pretty well!!!! And more for a "normal" indirect injection engine.Sometimes in the computer of my Pulsar appears 4,3-4,5 at 120. But then I whisper: "Fucking liar"and after that appears 5,5-6. All is ok. Welcome to the normality.....

[@CristianP]

Long life to narurally aspirated engines !!! 💪 But Europe wants turbocharged 3 cylinder ones for their shitty emissions checks 🙈🤣

[@GilZu]

US model...

[@angel-nf5ix]

yup looks the best

[@napim6752]

Slow for 2.0 147 hp

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

yes it was slow, but this car is good for long distance cruise :)

[@fwebe2871]

I dont't get your point WTFDUDE. Acceleration = Force/ Mass or Acceleration = Power/ Velocity/ Mass. I don't see, where displacement appears in that equation. I also dont't get, why this car should be slow. About 9 - 10 s for 0 to 100 km/ h is what you would expect of this car. Maybe your expectation is the problem. For comparison: How quick are other cars with about 190 Nm of Torque?

[@brandonblack2095]

Bugatti Chiron is faster much faster