2024 Mercedes Benz E 220 d Sedan (197+23 PS) TEST DRIVE

2024 Mercedes Benz E 220 d Sedan
150+17 kW / 217 HP / 197+23 PS
2.0L Turbo Diesel Engine
1993 cm3 / 121.6 CUI
4-Cylinder
440+205 Nm / 324+151 ft-lb
9-Speed Automatic
1915 kg / 4221 lbs
TEST DRIVE
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 100 to 200 kmh (62 mph to 124 mph)
Acceleration 0-200 kmh
Top Speed German Autobahn

[@Catchingcars]

one of the best Fuel consumptions we've tested yet!

[@Mr11ESSE111]

but still behind of VW golf /variant ,Passat variant ,Škoda Octavia and think superb too with 2.0 tdi 150hp , and S class with 286hp 4 years ago have about same consumption 9,5 l too ,

[@xxzmk]

Holy sh** the fuel consumption is crazy. 4 L / 100km on 130kph that is one hell of an efficient engine!

[@UncleSamGR]

Fuel consumption is crazy

[@Mr11ESSE111]

on Board computer are but i doubt its real!! Journalist few years ago tested with refueling into tank and all german manufacturers lies from 10-30% !! i think that only Mazda Cx 60 shows more consumption on board computer but reality was lower

[@aceultimate4393]

​@@Mr11ESSE111actually in this one it can be true, since its diesel with mild hybrid engine

[@Mr11ESSE111]

and others was diesel and mild hibrid are shit and dont do nothing overall @@aceultimate4393

[@bobalto]

@@Mr11ESSE111No actually these figures are given by the computer according to the conditions of the moment (maybe on a completely flat autobahn with no front or latéral wind, with speed regulator activated and 8th 9th gear engaged). In these conditions the computer estimated the figures you have seen. But if you get on an uphill slope or if any front wind during your journey, of course the computer will recalculate the figures according to the new conditions.

[@MrZillas]

@@Mr11ESSE111 Dude, 10 years ago I had an E350 CDI, that was a 3.0 V6-engine with 265 hp and 620 Nm. It has taken 7,3 liters only in the city(!) and out of the city was 5,3 liters possible. Full throttle on Autobahn it went 8,5 liters, no more.

[@nightpovcars7021]

This consumption 🔥🔥

[@19can84]

With this efficiency level, it probably has a lower carbon footprint than a eqe.

[@iRmazz96]

this and c class 220d are dream car, i would even go for 4matic, consumptions should still be very good

[@tombeffis1323]

Wie fandest du das Sitzpolster - straff gepolstert, weich oder genau richtig? Ich persönlich habe das Gefühl, dass das Sitzpolster im Vorgänger etwas weicher war. Ich kann mir vorstellen, dass dadurch der Langstreckenkomfort leidet.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Für mich hat es nicht so gestört, fand ihn ok. Denke könnte bequemer sein. Zb lexus es 300h war bequemer als e klasse bei langstrecke.

[@6.2v87]

Low fuel consumptions are so satisfying

[@onebreeleft]

wie findest du den Geräuschpegel im Innenraum bei Geschwindigkeiten von über 130 kmh ?

[@daniels2964]

Wie war denn dein Eindruck zum Geräuschpegel im Innenraum?

[@dertransporteur3784]

scheiße ist js ein benz aus plastik

[@jesushansmartinez5967]

How it is possible??? 3,4l /100km e220d and 4,7l /100km the c220d? The c class has less weight no?

[@paulch8743]

Because 23hp and 200nm more

[@waduhek2568]

Are you sure this was on a flat road? 5.5l/100km at 160KPH? seems a bit anomalous.

[@SuperKhaus]

My boss is driving the same car as a T-model. I haven't seen these fabulous consumption numbers on the display, but although he is driving his diesels like high output benzine motors, he's below 8 litres, which is very good on often unlimited German Autobahns. Nevertheless, although you don't hear the engine a lot, I would prefer a 350d or 400d, but I get a heart attack, when I see these prices, haha.

[@waduhek2568]

@@SuperKhaus that's why you buy them used. Depreciates more

[@MrZillas]

@@waduhek2568 That's why you get a used one, but not "bought", rather in a leasing or private financing with montly rates. You can get these then for 30.000 Euro. You put 5.000 Euro on the table, accept monthly rates of 250 Euro and give the car back after 4 years without paying the rest of 14.000 Euro. The saved money you can put into stocks, getting dividends each year, so sooner or later your stocks pay the car. With 50.000 Euro in dividend-stocks you drive this car for free (considering the monthly rates).

[@waduhek2568]

@@MrZillas not sure what country you are from, but interest rates for used car financing is quite high in my country, often 10%+ so I would rather pay cash. 2018 Audi A8 is around 25,000 euro in my country, so I would just pay cash and take yearly depreciation of 2,500 euro.

[@Lucas-nh2mk]

Incredible low consuption😮

[@lwandongonyama3743]

I thought my clubman cooper s was quite awesome doing 160 km/h at 2500 revs. But after seeing this merc with almost same power traits as my car doing the same speed at under 2000 revs I'm impressed

[@jakubromanak4143]

Are you sure that you drove same road and without strong wind in the back? The consumption is strangely low...

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

at 720 km i refuel the car (25% fuel left) only 45.28 liter so thats average 6.3 liter/100 km, even with topspeed test POV and many part highspeed, some part normal speed 120-160 kmh with medium traffic

[@difantluca]

My sedan preferred❤

[@sezginerol6364]

There are so many screens on the dashboard of the car that there is no soft-textured material left. The quality is very bad because of this damn screen and glass. It's like a mediamarkt store.

[@SDav21]

Those static LED lights don't look good. They should give the matrix LED as standard equipment. At least the fuel consumption is good. I wonder if there will be an E450d with the inline 6 diesel. That would be the best E to have.

[@alvaroloja7134]

Se espera un 400d para el 2025

[@6.2v87]

Yes, there will be👌🏽 Look at the configurator

[@user-fjsrt]

Digital light는 매우 비싼 옵션입니다. 시골길을 높은 속력으로 지나가지 않는다면 필요 없는 장치입니다. 고장나면 수리비가 비싸요.

[@Kalvarija]

Unbelievable fuel consumption

[@Mr11ESSE111]

S class have same or less consumption an older one with 286hp 3,0cdi from 2019 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bGHdnHmPqt55i9U

[@vrba9863]

I would say this is the best E class ever...and much more attractive then new 5 series BMW..

[@hcavdar]

thanks

[@waduhek2568]

huge difference between this and the t model as well despite having same engine.

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

The W213 also have the same engine with the same gear ratios and consumes more. Would be interesting how they manage to make it.

[@bob20068]

Und beim Verbrauch spielt der e-Motor eine entscheidende Rolle. Aber nur solange der Akku nicht leer ist. Demnach ist der tolle Verbrauch nicht als konstant zu sehen.

[@tim1703]

Das ist ein Mild Hybrid und kein Plug in, der das Fahrzeug eigentlich nur segeln lässt, die Batterie kann eigentlich nicht leer gehen außer man ballert vielleicht die ganze Zeit 230km/h

[@fwebe2871]

Das ist ein Mildhybrid, von daher ist der Akku auch nie leer und der e-Motor spielt entsprechend auch gerade bei Konstantfahrt so gut wie gar keine Rolle. Bei dem Fahrzeug kommt einfach eine gute Aerodynamik mit einem guten Rollwiderstand zusammen und der Motor ist so ausgelegt, dass er ab ca. 100 km/h in einem guten Last- und Drehzahlbereich arbeiten kann. Um es mit Benzinern vergleichen zu können, sollte man sich dann auch den Bruttoverbrauch ansehen (z.B. 27,44 kWh/100 km bei 100 km/h), da sieht man dann nämlich, dass das Fahrzeug insgesamt für diesen Bereich gut abgestimmt. Was man natürlich nicht vergessen darf ist der Punkt, dass solche Realtests keinerlei Vergleichbarkeit bieten, weil zum einem die Werte komplett aus dem Bordcomputer betrachtet werden und zum anderen die Umweltbedingungen ständig variieren. Wenn man also vernünftige Vergleiche haben will, schaut man sich die 4 Normverbräuche an, dafür sind diese nämlich da. Da stellt man dann natürlich auch fest, dass die EU diese Vergleichbarkeit bei Elektrofahrzeugen gar nicht erst eingeführt hat, dort gibt es nämlich keine Einzelverbrauchsangaben, sondern nur den kombinierten Wert als Pflichtangabe.

[@johnz4860]

All those digital touchscreens will age horribly once fads and technology move on to something completely different. There is a good reason why luxury watchmakers such as Rolex and IWC have NEVER made a single digital watch!

[@mikojarvinen6273]

A watch you may keep a lifetime but a car your average person won’t. The first owner will upgrade after 3 to 4 years. How it ages won’t matter. Cars have never aged particularly well.

[@johnz4860]

@@mikojarvinen6273 I beg to differ. Many 40-year-old w123 diesel Mercs are used for daily commutes worldwide, many of them have done well over a million kilometres. It is not uncommon to see and read about Mercedes cars that are inherited by the next generations and which keep doing hundreds of thousands of kilometres. Irv Gordon said it repeatedly, if you look after your car and drive It daily, it will outlive you.

[@bobalto]

@@mikojarvinen6273 Mercedes W126 560SEC: hold my beer bro…look at me 😎

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Ich fuhr neulich in einem W214 als E200. Außen schön, innen ein Graus. Schrecklich viel harter Kunststoff, Motor im Leerlauf (Ottomotor!) deutlich hörbar, außerdem ist das Armaturenbrett so geformt, dass der Innenraum schmal wirkt, ein "großes - Auto - Gefühl" stellte sich bei mir nicht ein, es wirkte eher wie ein CLA. Für mich ein Auto mit wenig "haben - wollen - Gefühl", aber der Verbrauch des Diesels ist der Wahnsinn 😮

[@SuperSenis]

It's a real shame that the American car market does not have these HIGH MPG diesel cars...

[@hazemmah3548]

I will not believe this fuel consumption till I drive it 😂

[@MrZillas]

Believe it. The friend of my mother has a C250, like 5 years old at least, does 6 liters with it. 10 years ago, my E350 CDI V6 did 7,3 liters in the city.

[@hazemmah3548]

@@MrZillas can you explain the secret behind this !

[@daveb0789]

Speedometer 5 kph + over read

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Der Verbrauch ist tatsächlich extrem niedrig, meines Erachtens zu niedrig. Der Vorgänger W213 mit dem gleichen Motor (OM 654) und identischer Aerodynamik sowie weniger Gewicht benötigt deutlich mehr. Ich vermute daher stark, dass der Elektromotor hier kräftig mitgeholfen hat. Eine längere Strecke wird den Verbrauch zum Beispiel bei 100 km/h wohl kaum bei unter 3 Liter pro 100 Kilometer stehenlassen, ich würde hier eher rund 4 annehmen.

[@MrZillas]

Der Lexus LS600h wiegt 2,5 oder 2,6 Tonnen und kommt auf 12 Liter mit einem 5.0-V8-Saugmotor. 200 elektrische PS drücken den Wagen bis Tempo 50 rein elektrisch. Für 5.0 V8-Sauger musste der W212 schon 16-20 Liter hinlegen.

[@furkankallkan]

Dream car…

[@sliwka621]

I've calculated that for an average diesel sedan to use 5.5 liters of fuel after 100 kilometers going 160 km/h would mean that the engine has a thermal efficiency of 66,34%. Any mechanical engineer will laugh at these impossible fuel consumption figures.

[@bloffama]

18 km/L at 160!!!! Madness

[@MagicMike87]

Sedan is much more economical than wagon (160 km/h:7,6 l/100 km) vs 5,5 l(sedan)

[@qh5163]

Verbrauch 80 km/h ?? War wohl nicht meßbar weil zu gering? 😀

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

@@qh5163 nee da war zu viele lkw unterwegs und wollte denen nicht nerven mit 80 kmh auf rechte Spur, sonst bekomme ich lichthupe gewitter hinten

[@point4894]

🐈 cat bless diesel mercedes

[@luisartglv7173]

E class has never looked this generic. remove the badge and it could be any chinese car brand

[@lordkorner]

Nonsense

[@ivanove]

1km is to short to have a real estimate of consumption. 10km is ok.

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

With high traffic isnt easy and we dont have much free time for a test. for 10 km fuel consumption test i have to test at 3 AM morning

[@ivanove]

@@TESTDRIVEFREAK there is a big difference between the 220 T you tested

[@ivanove]

I doubt it is only to aero?

[@6.2v87]

@@ivanove Yes it is. That‘s the only reason SUVs consume so much. And the T is a lot less aero in comparison to the Sedan

[@ivanove]

@@6.2v87 Sedan 0.23 cw 5,5 l per 160 kmh Estate 0.26 cw 7,6 l per 160 kmh The aero of the estate is also great Suv woul be 0.32 or more… The difference in consumption is to big to be only aero. Tail wind, downhill or something else is the reason… :)

[@lbc38]

It’s a camel 🐫

[@TheFunkyair]

unbelievable too good to be true 220d t wagon looks like dumbest choice over this

[@ian4675]

I cant get past the seats, wtf?

[@tmilt4375]

back wind

[@lipcsaiify]

Hybrid engines left the chat

[@jugobetrugo4168]

fuel consumptions is top, but it is very cheap plastic, same as bmw5, seats are cheap...

[@Fia823]

Mi Nuevo Gobierno se titula Jueces Señoría amis hijos o hijas no legusta que le agan fotos ni vidios porque sea una Estrella pero ami la tecnología no megusta Jueces

[@Fia823]

Mi Nuevo Gobierno se titula Jueces Señoría amis hermanos y mis cuñadas no ledigais nada cuando boi hacer algo porque tarda en contárselo a todo el mundo Jueces y se lo boi a decir amis padres jueces se lo boi a contar todo Jueces

[@andreasxfjd4141]

not well-equipped car

[@bob20068]

Die Sitze sehen aber überhaupt nicht so aus wie man es von einer Luxus Marke erwartet. In meinem Mazda 6 sehen die Sitze aber auch die Instrumententafel subjektiv betrachtet besser aus.

[@maxk7258]

Optional gegen Aufpreis gibts schöne Ledersitze

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Was ist denn mit "einer Luxus" gemeint?

[@bob20068]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator zu schlau um zu verstehen? Luxusmarke.

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

@@bob20068 Erzähl mir mal, ob der Satz "24 Monate ohne Grund Gebühr" das gleiche bedeutet wie der Satz "24 Monate ohne Grundgebühr". ;)

[@bob20068]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator mein Satz ist für Sie das Gleiche wie Ihr Beispiel? Oder geht es hier um das Prinzip?

[@thelocodriver007]

🤮🤮🤮🤮

[@Mr11ESSE111]

add on this numbers 10-30% more in reality if he test with refueling !! all german manufacturers lies alot !! Japanese ones are closest to truth and seems that Mazda board computer at least on CX 60 3,3 diesel shows higher consumption then it is in reality when i watch other german chanel which tested it with refueling

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

i had this mercedes for 725 km, so after 720 km and i only refuel 45,28 liter so thats around 6.3 liter 100 km, even with top speed test, POV, acceleration, NightPOV also topspeed and Catching Cars video highspeed, and rest was around 140-170 kmh cruising with medium traffic

[@Mr11ESSE111]

average consumption are basically average with others or slightly higher if we compare vs 2.0tdi-s with 150 and 190hp @@TESTDRIVEFREAK

[@slepy777]

I znowu ten słabo wyciszony klekot 220d. Czy Mercedes nie ma innych silników oprócz tego diesla? Rzygać już się chce od tego 220d. Wszędzie 220d. Tragedia.