The 10 Most Advanced Fighter Jets In 2023

FFighter jets are widely regarded as the most significant aircraft in any air force. Their mission is to defend the airspace as well as to attack the adversary. They must be swift, covert, capable of carrying enormous payloads, and deliver with precise accuracy. To be effective on the modern battlefield, a fighter must be extremely advanced. The majority of fighter jets in modern armies are of the fourth generation. They are highly nimble, equipped with modern radars, and are exceedingly versatile. Fifth-generation fighter planes are the most recent and advanced machines. They are not only stealthy, but they are also outfitted with cutting-edge avionics, data linkages, and sensors. However, the most recent technology comes at a price. As a result, rather than buying brand new planes, many countries will upgrade their fourth-generation aeroplanes with fifth-generation technology. These fighters are from generation 4+ or 4.5.
AIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email [e-mail].

[@christopherlamitie7952]

The best part of this list is the same aircraft will appear on it in different orders whenever it is released.

[@joseantoniogilsanchez4407]

F35 better than Raptor????😂😂😂😂😂😂😂... and... Chinese Aircraft too.... 😂😂😂😂😂

[@VarunBhat07]

F22 Raptor is capable of shooting down the Balloons 😂😂

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

😂😂😂😂

[@danielxiong7227]

Not just balloons but 🛸.

[@VarunBhat07]

@@danielxiong7227 But as of now balloons only 😂😂

[@InsertSomenickorsomethingOK]

Su57 is capable of flying on parades

[@batikopssj3557]

@@VarunBhat07meanwhile, india's tejas is a flying samosa ! 🤣

[@claye323]

You guys at the buzz must be smoking something…the J-20 over the F-22… simply Ludacris. Is the PLA sponsoring KZbin channels now?😂

[@hatty101]

did this troll really put the su57 in the 5th rank? LOL.

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

Most of these aircraft's true capabilities are top secret, and will be continuingly updated. So a lot of the specifications will be speculative at best! Wikipedia is just a public information service that the military throw some figures at!

[@Ali_Srour]

True

[@emilsohn1671]

Well the SU 57s capabilites are hardly top secret, we know fairly well how they are; it ins't stealthy, it's avionics are not modern because Russia don't develop such things and about a 10th of the fleet has already crashed (yes, 1). Putting it ahead of something like a Typhoon or Rafale or even a modern F16 variant is a joke. Completely and utterly. Vid's like this play into the mythology that Russia has these "hand-crafted" prototypes on par with western tech, but ofc not many (yet), for the sake of entertainment. But those of us with industrial experience know the truth in this regard; the ability to produce something like a 5th gen fighter comes only, with emphasis on only,from a large and solid R&D and industrial base with well-established and functional supply chains. Not from some secret mythologized secret Soveit R&D that is somehow supposed to be still "modern", cutting edge and relevant. It isn't.

[@michaelphillips3123]

J-20 better than a Raptor? Ridiculous.

[@energymf1991]

Australian experts have simulated the rcs of j-20. But it uses the most original j-20 in 2011 He uses the method of physical optics to simulate, but this method has limitations It just can't be simulated at all angles, and there are skins and stealth paints, which can't be simulated. And there is a certain gap between the simulated j-20 data and the real j-20. Under his simulation, The rcs value of the 12GHZ X-band radar j-20 looking down and looking up plus or minus 30 degrees is 0.01-0.0001. But the difference in the results is relatively large. Why I mentioned this person first is that many people in European and American countries do not believe that duck wings can be invisible. But in China, before designing the aircraft, it will simulate in a better way, and there are analysis articles, Under normal layout, There are no dsi intakes in all directions. 1.7ghz rcs average is from 0.035-0.047 Canard is 0.037-0.063- 5.6Ghz rcs average value is Regular layout 0.011-0.020 Canard layout 0.009-0.030 Why some canards have lower rcs. That's because when detecting from the side wing angle, the rear wing vertical tail and the horizontal tail of the conventional layout are basically in one position, which will form a secondary reflection. Of course, the canard will increase the rcs value a little bit, but it can be reduced by design. And there is not an insurmountable gap between the two sides in terms of stealth. In the early days of the United States, there were also aircraft with canard layout design. But the trapezoidal canard was used, and the trailing edge of the canard was slightly inclined outward. This effect is to scatter the trailing edge of the canard to the main wing, and use the scattering peak of the main wing to cover the radar scattering of the canard. J-20 because at the beginning of the design, China's engine is still very poor. So design canards The design adopts a dislocation parallel design. The front end of the canards of the j-20 is outward, and the rear end of the rear wing is inward. That is, the front end of the canard of j-20 is parallel to the rear end of the main wing. The rear end of the canard is parallel to the front end of the main wing. Taking into account the design of steering and stealth. So if you watch the J-20 video, when the canard is in its original position, the rear end of the canard is higher than the fuselage of the fighter In this regard, the gap with the conventional layout will be greater, compared to the canard front end. But the impact of the rcs gap is still very small. Because J-20 has a sawtooth treatment on the rear end of the canard, and uses the method of applying stealth paint with a honeycomb structure. Further reduce the rcs value As for the gap of the j-20 canard, Chengdu Aviation Institute simulated the radar test of the stealth paint in the gap of the canard, and the original position of the canard decreased from -33 decibels to -38 decibels. Without stealth paint it is -20 decibels to -21 decibels. Moreover, the j-20 design team also changed the angle of the front port above the air inlet to block the back and forth reflection waves formed by the gap between the canard and the fuselage. Of course, this paper is a simulation of the early data of j-20, and later j-20 has been revised As for the reflected wave formed by the outer corner of the rear end of the canard, it is enough to cut off a small part of the corner. And the radar reflection caused by the canard rotation. Only in the intense excitement of take-off and landing, close combat and evading missiles, the canards will rotate at a large angle. Even if a fighter with a conventional layout encounters this situation and turns, the rcs value will increase a lot, so there is no need to discuss the rcs value of canards in takeoff and landing, close combat and missile avoidance Moreover, the influence of the angle rsc value brought by the large-angle rotation of the canard will be better than that of the conventional layout fighter. The j-20 basically does not use canards in normal flight conditions, but uses other wings. So you can go to watch the video of j-20, the canards are basically not used. It is almost still at the original angle. The normal flight is only between 5 degrees The treatment method of the pelvic fin is much simpler, because the structural strength required by the pelvic fin is relatively small. J-20 directly uses copper-based memory metals that resist magnetism, composite skins, and wave-absorbing honeycomb materials to make ventral fins, which will not only not affect the stealth, but also reduce the stealth of the tail engine. Reduce side stealth and infrared radar detection . China has also tested the influence of the Rcs value of the engine nozzle. The F22 is the worst. The circular axisymmetric nozzle is better than the F22 nozzle. The best is the trapezoidal nozzle of the flying wing layout. But fighter jets need vector engines, and trapezoidal nozzles cannot be made. The nozzle of F22 is to reduce the infrared scanning. omnidirectional radar reflection F-22 has 8 reflected wave systems. Su-57 has 11 reflection wave systems, 2 inlet edges are not parallel to the wing, and 1 tail cone. F-35 has 10 reflected wave systems. The trailing edge of 2 vertical tails is not parallel to the others. YF-23 4 reflected wave system. j-20 10 reflected wave system, 2 canards. As for the specific rcs value of j-20, it is hard to say. But what is certain is that it is stronger than f-35 and weaker than F-22. Because the J-20 has a smoother fuselage surface than the F-35 If you ask me which plane is better. Based on the information and inferences I have obtained personally. Removed the stealth paint, because the stealth paint is not easy to judge. J-20 is better. The F-22 aircraft is designed to be more stealthy but without dsi. It can’t be networked with other aircraft either. The speed is not as good as j-20 (Some people may not believe it, but I can explain that the engine of the F-22 was the strongest at that time, so the exterior design of the F-22 was biased towards subsonic maneuverability. The j-20 has better canard wings Lift and stability, because stability reduces drag, so it has better supersonic performance, the simplest explanation is that when gravity and lift completely overlap, everything is balanced, F-22 lift and stability have no J- 20 is high, so the drag increases, and the performance of the canard will be different due to different positions. For a canard with the same weight and area, the farther it is from the main wing, the higher the lift coefficient. The farther away from the main wing the same lift coefficient is, the smaller the area required , the smaller the area, the smaller the resistance, and the faster the speed, and the closer the rear end of the canard to the main wing, the better the maneuverability, but the smaller the lift, so it needs to increase the canard area to have lift, so the weight will be greater , the canard of the Rafale fighter is closer to the main wing, it has good maneuverability, but the lift coefficient is weaker than the j-20, the gust is 1.7, while the j-20 is 2.0. Many people always say that j-20 copied mig1.44 is a mistake Yes, their canard positions and fuselage layouts are all different, as long as there is a slight gap, a flight control system has to be remade and it takes a long time to test and collect data for various flight angles.) The average stealth of the F-35 is not as good as that of the J-20, and the fuselage is not smooth, but the difference is not big, because the J-20 has canards. The F-35 is a medium-sized fighter with a powerful engine, but it has only one engine, and the output power is smaller than that of the J-20. The radar scanning range and scanning intensity of the fighter depend on the power output of the engine. The radar material used by the j-20 is also the latest gallium nitride. It is the same as the F-35, so the radar of the j-20 will be stronger than that of the F-35 As for the electronic system, we can learn from Pakistan's j-10ce, which has helmet display, voice assistance, and voice commands. The degree of intelligence may be different, but I don't think the gap is fatal. The pl-15 missile of the J-20 on the missile will be stronger. Because the range is longer. Of course, it is unreasonable to speculate without comparing the stealth paint. But we are just ordinary people, it is impossible to know. There is no way to obtain it. I can only compare with the current fighter parameters. However, this also prompted the F35 to update the radar and develop a stronger f135 engine. It depends on whether the United States can accumulate experience on the F-35 and use it on the next generation of fighters. And the j-20 engine ws-15 has also started production, one engine has a thrust of 15 tons, and the acceleration thrust is 18 tons. Maintenance is 2000 hours. It's just not mass-produced yet. Because there is no production line.

[@nelsonho1605]

F22 is a product from last century. Are you OK?

[@KodingKuma]

I don't think this is ordered correctly.

[@joelcusick8799]

No JAS-39 Gripen E?

[@H.P206]

I think the JAS-39 Gripen E should have the place of the rafale

[@emanuelfaria2377]

Is better than eurofighter 🇵🇹

[@noproki2838]

The only plane available if you have to fight a huge military power alone.

[@aranklogu]

If you don't know specifications & capabilities of Chinese jet fighter why put them at no.2 spot? This is bs.

[@sorennilsson9742]

The absence of Jas 39 E and F is rather surprising since it contains tech that is superior to many of the fighters here. GaN tech in its E warfaire suite, a new structure in its aviation suite that is now being copied by the USA, UK, France and so on for their future fighters, the worlds newest IRST system far superior to any here existing fighters the F 35 excluded, 7 different radar antenas puting its detection in the class of a SU 57, a 360° missile detection capability a computer capability only bested by the F35 and on it goes.

[@Erik_larsson10]

Bra en svensk som förstår. Lol endå att j 20 den chinesiska skiten kunde vara med

[@ytn00b3]

Well, even F-16V isn't at the top 10. I think this video focused on more on Air superiority fighters with powerful engines.

[@sorennilsson9742]

@@ytn00b3 New F16 has a power to weight of 1,1, Jas 39 E has 1,07. Jas 39 E and F16 70 are both mac 2+ fighters. As for the tech in the block 72 it to a larg degree holds the standard of a Jas 39 E. However not all of the tech on Jas is even possible to get on the F16 block 72. You can today buy a Jas 39 C with a GaN radar superior or at least as good as the F16 block 70 radar. To add to this block 70 has an impressive radar that uses tech from the F35 and F22. The IRST on the Jas 39 E and F16 block 72 should have aproximatly the same prestanda. The RCS on the Jas 39 E is lower than the RCS on the F16. The combat range is slightly longer on the F16. It has been stated that the F-16 Block 70 with conformal fuel tanks has a mission radius exceeding 1,700 kilometres (km) in an air-to-air configuration carrying four AMRAAMs, two ASRAAMs and two 370 gallon fuel tanks while the Jas 39 E has a combatrange of 1500 km with four meteor missiles and two IRS-T missiles. Jas 39 E does have a better E-warfare suite based on GaN tech. The Jas Radar has the adwantage of covering more than 200°. This means that the Jas 39 E can turn the side to an enemy and hide in the doppler shadow while guiding the missile. Both have excellent comunication equipment, satellite, directional link 16 and radio givng them comunication with all military and civilian sources of information. Both have by usage of their IRST capability to detect steahlt fighters. Both have fire before lock on weapons and fire at what you can see tech. Both can fire at targets behind them. Jas 39E has a 360° missile detection capacity. I do not know if F16 block 72 have that have not found it. Both have acces to elecronic defence and attack for long range, Jas 39 E can also use decoy missiles agains detected long range missiles, within 5 km they can use their own short range missiles to kill incoming missiles. Jas uses missile the toed decoys (BriteCloud system) and at close range shafts and flairs. The F16 block 72 have similar systems. I would argue that it is harder to down a Jas 39 E than a F16 of any block since it is easier to hide. So in A2A I would choose a Jas 39 E, for ground attack I would choose an F16 if the enemy SAM system is gone. If not I would choose the Jas 39 E.

[@molstad182]

@@ytn00b3 if its focused on air superiority fighters with powerful engines, then the F16 should most definitely be on here

[@molstad182]

@@sorennilsson9742 does the block 70 use asraams instead of aim 9X tho?

[@Samsun55]

F22 on 3rd place is a joke.

[@kevinzhang-chen8106]

i honestly thought the F-22 raptor would be first

[@galvanaut7119]

It probably really is.

[@danielxiong7227]

NGAD has already flown then it will be the boss.

[@lexxsharingan1506]

Only Su-35C really working fighter jet. At fifth generation only Raptor really flying.

[@arthurwilliam3199]

Rafale is better than Typhon

[@JaxBarrowTRUCide]

I agree. Omnirole from the conception when it took three versions of the Eurofighter to have roughly the same capabilities. The Rafale is in its 4th evolution and the 5th is scheduled. The SPECTRA system makes it clearly superior.

[@Dante-cq2zo]

True, better than de F15EX as well

[@williamz8354]

Before Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, its carrier based aircraft had little practical experience, but it ultimately succeeded. Similarly, the US Navy had no practical experience before counterattacking the Japanese. But in the end, it defeated the Japanese navy. Before saying that the J-20 has no practical experience, does the F-22 have practical experience? What is used to compare them now is just a series of data. No matter how ridiculous you may think, if the F-22 itself doesn't have a major upgrade, it would be like a celebrity sports car from the 1990s. The J-20 was designed to deal with the F-22, and one of its main tasks is to confront it. With China's continuous improvement in core components, such as engines, radars, and anti-aircraft missiles, the frequency of J-20 updates will be much higher than that of F-22. And after one version, it surpassed the F-22 overall. So I think the current version's ranking should be: 1. F-22 2. J-20 3. F-35 The final version ranking should be 1. J-20 2. F-35 3. F-22

[@socomxx]

The f-22 has a shit ton of experience......,

[@elbanoleon1037]

Good

[@jws6181]

I mis the FA/18 Hornet and the Jas 39 grippen....

[@Elthenar]

I am very skeptical that the J-20 is more advanced than the F-22. Even though the 22 is much older, it's stealth is still much more advanced. There is a good chance it's radar and engines are better too. The J-20 uses some tech stolen from the US but it's largely modeled on the Russian 5th gen fighters that appear lower on the list.

[@williamtrueman7898]

I totally agree. The Chinese do not deal in truth, so their jet fighter capabilities are not tested in the real world. The countries that develop their own airframe designs should be the only fighters considered for this list.

[@benjaminneaves3195]

The F22 full capability are still classified

[@iyit3684]

Los chinos no son más que una burda copia del armamento bélico de muchos países.

[@sebastianag2966]

Yeah there is no way. They also claim it's 10 times cheaper, which is the biggest joke of them all. That's something dilutional as something north korea would claim.

[@Aztec1050]

J20 is at the same level as base F16. China doesn’t have the technology to make the materials used in the components so it’s assembled in China, made in the USA. But well all the US jets are designed by ethnically Chinese scientists in the US so…

[@WiFuzzy]

Who made this list...lmao.

[@MJ-YT-USR]

This is the first such video I've seen that doesn't put the F22 at No.1. That was a surprise.

[@tranhai8895]

Hi, can you make a comparison about ejection seats?

[@janmalin5652]

0:56 image of Suchoj Su-27M (Su-35) 😀

[@Thewiruz1]

Seriously wheres JAS 39 ?

[@bafattvahetere]

That's what the enemies ask when in combat. A sec later been shot down from the back.

[@kylietravers3466]

Su-57: Oh Ok 🫤 KF-21: I’m The Copy of The F-22 and F-15 F-22: WHAT?! BRUH!!!! 🤬 J-20: That What I’m Talking about! I’m a Goat With Technology! 😆 F-35: *S I G M A* I Am The Gigachad

[@Richard-vt7it]

What everyone fails to see is while the rest of the world is building 5th gen aircraft the United States is building 6 gen and designing7 gen fighters.

[@pritambala7341]

It's not the plane it's the pilot - from the movie 'Top Gun' (maverick).

[@terrywainman6050]

The typhoon speed is 1,550 mph and as a service ceiling of above 65,000 ft

[@toufegariouogios]

Rafale is better than Typhoon and F-15! Actually it is the best non 5th generation Aircraft!

[@philthai99]

The US is upgrading its A-10, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-15 and F-35 aircraft.

[@evanxxx2264]

сша настолько бедна на умы что не может создать что то о новое!))))))))))))))

[@francisamewode233]

SU 35 the best 4 th generation fighter in the world.

[@Ali_Srour]

Only in maneuverability

[@1thommyberlin]

The Fokker VII was the best fighter flying in 1918. What's your point?

[@sanitasfitness7070]

Stealth version of the Rafale? Wow... never knew...

[@nuruddin1991]

It's not totally stealth, but the size on radar os decrease

[@Maddog-xc2zv]

@@nuruddin1991 still no stealth version as the lady clearly stated.

[@bikesfrench8524]

Rafale système spectra ça le rend invisible

[@emilsohn1671]

@@Maddog-xc2zv SU57 is less stealthy than rafale, but gets to masqerade as 5th gen.

[@Maddog-xc2zv]

@@emilsohn1671 yeah, russian propaganda. and still they lack the numbers in su57 to be usefull anywhere as a 4,5 or "5"th gen jet

[@Valentino75750]

whats happen to Jas 39 E??

[@user-fq4qk9wz5k]

So let’s get this right the f 22 rapture which the majority of experts that I’ve ever seen in documentaries on tv discussing the the attributes of all modern fighters all seem to agree is the most stealthiest and the most deadly of em all at present is only good enough for third place on ur list . interesting but probably incorrect by 2 places I reckon

[@arranshirovay4064]

POPPING RAPTORS! you just got the Balloon achievement 🏆

[@user-xn4xy6vz5j]

I'm still waiting for the 6th generation fighter jets to come out in a few years

[@wa5thunder]

6th gen fighters wont even have its first maiden flight for at least another decade half the world has not had its first maiden flight for there fith gen fighter so you might have to wait 1-2 decades untill a sixth gen fighter comes out

[@petertoth320]

The SU-30SM2 better then the F-15EX and MiG-31BSM better then Rafale.

[@maximerivard-ho6qu]

It's funny how all the 5th gen fighters are like a copy-paste of the F22 with small differences but the basis Is the exact same shape

[@alsultanmingkabawi6176]

*I agree with you* *All this while I thought I was the only one who are aware of this. That's why I really like to see the SU57 5th generation jet design which is completely different from the F22...*

[@chaew6443]

su35 maybe counted as better than rafales typhoons and f15's but its up to the uploaders most trustworthy knowledge i guess

[@terrywainman6050]

The su35 is not in the same league as the typhoon

[@william_gran-sorensen]

Where is the jas 39 gripen E

[@guillaumeromain6694]

Bitting the dust behind the lot

[@MrRoninGT]

The photo of the SU-35 is incorrect, the maximum speed is 2.500 kph The maximum speed of the F-22 is 2.410 kph, in peacetime the maximum speed is limited to M = 2, that is, 2.124 kph Maximum speed of SU-57 - 3.000 kph.

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

True. Su 35 is faster than F22

[@frios011]

Too many F-22 clones!

[@70agrr]

No Gripens, srsly!! and the SU57 ? so good noone has seen one.....................

[@xinyisuoshu]

Strangely, except for the US Air Force, the whole world thinks that j20 can't work.

[@VarunBhat07]

In battlefield pilot skills only matters

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

That is right. Technology is awesome but the people use it is more important

[@matt.willoughby]

@@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 no it's not right. You could be the most skilled f-4 pilot on Earth and lose to the worst f35 pilot

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

@@matt.willoughby That is only theory, in the war there is everything can happen

[@matt.willoughby]

@@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 If you want to be like that then anything physically possible could happen at any time, why limit it just to wartime? The best B52 pilot would lose against the worst F22 pilot. Not theory, that a guaranteed outcome.

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

@@matt.willoughby You are so funny. Why do you compare a bomber aircraft with a fighter aircraft??? It's not in the same category

[@strikebr]

A 10 most advanced fighters list without Gripen F39E on it, is not a reliable list.

[@pathomthavaradhara]

Well, the next generation aircraft fighters, may be stealth subsonic and use batteries technology for power, which will make most of the aircraft heat seeking missiles obsolete.

[@Simpleton983]

3:06 ..the first 4th gen fighter was F-14 Tomcat, not Eagle

[@mth469]

How was that better than a Mig-23

[@erikdavidantonio5368]

4:22 You really have to laugh... out of the first 5 fighters, the Gripen E tops them all!

[@thenovicegamer007]

How so?

[@guillaumeromain6694]

😂 no.... not at all

[@brulsmurf]

meh, su35 is on par with f16 at best. Lets call it a gen 4.1 airplane

[@softballm1991]

On the SU 57 IF you cannot build them then they do not real. Live in your make beleive world.

[@Joe-yy2mj]

I'd rank F22 higher than F35

[@yomama629]

I wouldn't. The F-22 has better kinematic performance but inferior radar, avionics, sensors, and EW capabilities. Radar cross section wise they're about on the same level

[@Artemissia123]

Le Rafale en 9 iem position ? Ce classement est une farce ! Pouce vers le bas direct !

[@stuartwiner7920]

I think the ranges of these planes are rubbish, which makes me doubt the other #'s in the specs.

[@christopherchristianvanlan1809]

What happened to Tejas, Mitsubishi F14s and And Migs. Turkish F16 and J10 are all missing

[@philanthropenos1074]

What is Turkish F-16? Aren't they blackmailing Nato to acquire a bunch of F-16 Block 70s? Or do you mean TAI Kaan, the "engineless" fighter? (Another engineless case besides T129 and the MBT Altay)

[@APerson-ni1gb]

The su-35 Did have canards at first as a prototype called SU-27M noobs

[@mohammed-nu2rh]

The first picture of the fighter plane is not the Sukhoi 35, but it is the Sukhoi 33. You must give the information credibility.

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

I think that is Su 37 or maybe Su 30MKI, not Su 35

[@joshrogers3406]

Google says you’re wrong

[@mohammed-nu2rh]

@@joshrogers3406 Do you mean me by this???? I hope for an answer, and if you do not answer, consider the words directed at me... Then I will tell you that you do not understand anything, hahaha, so do not speak and remain silent.

[@jaketanner54]

The j-20 will get mopped by the F-22 smh

[@Dmitri_Donskoy]

Is this opinion based on a reliable source or is it just a biased personal perception

[@nelsonho1605]

​@@Dmitri_Donskoy he is an Indian illiterate village man I guess

[@tranhai8895]

Su-57 must be number 1

[@waltanthony1988]

speed, climbing ability, agility, etc. don't matter nearly as much for air to air fighters anymore. As long as it can detect enemies first (powerful radar, stealth, etc) and fire effective long range missiles.... than it could be a Cessna for all that matters. Dog fighting is a thing of the past, modern fighters are snipers in the sky.

[@mateuszpanasiuk9301]

One nuke in stratosphere and your all radars in area are useless for months. Thats why F22 Su57 and any further "real" fighter will keep Dogfight capability.

[@waltanthony1988]

@@mateuszpanasiuk9301 first off, I don't think that is how escalation works. The idea that "the enemy fired nukes at us (and damaged our jets) .... lets go dogfight them!" is funny. If a jet (with unhardened systems) takes a direct hit with an NEMP than it probably is out of fight entirely. If it knocks out the radar and computer systems, the pilot will be lucky to land it let alone dogfight. Yes, modern stealth fighters keep the ability to fight at close range ....as a contingency. Much like a sniper keeping a sidearm. Thus people speculating on the snipers ability to fight at close range with his sidearm (usually against others snipers with their sidearms) is ridiculous.

[@prism8289]

@@waltanthony1988 wait until the latest technology can spot 5th Gen fighters under any condition. Then we start all over again. All of a sudden, we’ll want 1000 F-15s or a plane mounted laser that can strike 100 miles away.

[@F-15C_Eagle.]

@@prism8289100% correct I think thats the main goal of the newer Chinese and Russian flankers along with maneuverability

[@jamesdavies7891]

NUKES ARE FAKE BTW THA LIED TO YOU SORRY MAN JUST TRUTH YYH @@mateuszpanasiuk9301

[@AyushVerma-wz6vd]

where is the 10th Gen "JF-17" taiyyaraa.....🙁🙁

[@subasthapa8323]

I was waiting for Teja da invisible Samosa. But she didn't list in top 10 😢. May be she will list it in top 50 😅😊

[@Mom_stealer_the_III]

Don't just make videos on the bases of specifications provided by sneaky countries. J20 isn't powerful then F22 at all. Just research.

[@energymf1991]

Australian experts have simulated the rcs of j-20. But it uses the most original j-20 in 2011 He uses the method of physical optics to simulate, but this method has limitations It just can't be simulated at all angles, and there are skins and stealth paints, which can't be simulated. And there is a certain gap between the simulated j-20 data and the real j-20. Under his simulation, The rcs value of the 12GHZ X-band radar j-20 looking down and looking up plus or minus 30 degrees is 0.01-0.0001. But the difference in the results is relatively large. Why I mentioned this person first is that many people in European and American countries do not believe that duck wings can be invisible. But in China, before designing the aircraft, it will simulate in a better way, and there are analysis articles, Under normal layout, There are no dsi intakes in all directions. 1.7ghz rcs average is from 0.035-0.047 Canard is 0.037-0.063- 5.6Ghz rcs average value is Regular layout 0.011-0.020 Canard layout 0.009-0.030 Why some canards have lower rcs. That's because when detecting from the side wing angle, the rear wing vertical tail and the horizontal tail of the conventional layout are basically in one position, which will form a secondary reflection. Of course, the canard will increase the rcs value a little bit, but it can be reduced by design. And there is not an insurmountable gap between the two sides in terms of stealth. In the early days of the United States, there were also aircraft with canard layout design. But the trapezoidal canard was used, and the trailing edge of the canard was slightly inclined outward. This effect is to scatter the trailing edge of the canard to the main wing, and use the scattering peak of the main wing to cover the radar scattering of the canard. J-20 because at the beginning of the design, China's engine is still very poor. So design canards The design adopts a dislocation parallel design. The front end of the canards of the j-20 is outward, and the rear end of the rear wing is inward. That is, the front end of the canard of j-20 is parallel to the rear end of the main wing. The rear end of the canard is parallel to the front end of the main wing. Taking into account the design of steering and stealth. So if you watch the J-20 video, when the canard is in its original position, the rear end of the canard is higher than the fuselage of the fighter In this regard, the gap with the conventional layout will be greater, compared to the canard front end. But the impact of the rcs gap is still very small. Because J-20 has a sawtooth treatment on the rear end of the canard, and uses the method of applying stealth paint with a honeycomb structure. Further reduce the rcs value As for the gap of the j-20 canard, Chengdu Aviation Institute simulated the radar test of the stealth paint in the gap of the canard, and the original position of the canard decreased from -33 decibels to -38 decibels. Without stealth paint it is -20 decibels to -21 decibels. Moreover, the j-20 design team also changed the angle of the front port above the air inlet to block the back and forth reflection waves formed by the gap between the canard and the fuselage. Of course, this paper is a simulation of the early data of j-20, and later j-20 has been revised As for the reflected wave formed by the outer corner of the rear end of the canard, it is enough to cut off a small part of the corner. And the radar reflection caused by the canard rotation. Only in the intense excitement of take-off and landing, close combat and evading missiles, the canards will rotate at a large angle. Even if a fighter with a conventional layout encounters this situation and turns, the rcs value will increase a lot, so there is no need to discuss the rcs value of canards in takeoff and landing, close combat and missile avoidance Moreover, the influence of the angle rsc value brought by the large-angle rotation of the canard will be better than that of the conventional layout fighter. The j-20 basically does not use canards in normal flight conditions, but uses other wings. So you can go to watch the video of j-20, the canards are basically not used. It is almost still at the original angle. The normal flight is only between 5 degrees The treatment method of the pelvic fin is much simpler, because the structural strength required by the pelvic fin is relatively small. J-20 directly uses copper-based memory metals that resist magnetism, composite skins, and wave-absorbing honeycomb materials to make ventral fins, which will not only not affect the stealth, but also reduce the stealth of the tail engine. Reduce side stealth and infrared radar detection . China has also tested the influence of the Rcs value of the engine nozzle. The F22 is the worst. The circular axisymmetric nozzle is better than the F22 nozzle. The best is the trapezoidal nozzle of the flying wing layout. But fighter jets need vector engines, and trapezoidal nozzles cannot be made. The nozzle of F22 is to reduce the infrared scanning. omnidirectional radar reflection F-22 has 8 reflected wave systems. Su-57 has 11 reflection wave systems, 2 inlet edges are not parallel to the wing, and 1 tail cone. F-35 has 10 reflected wave systems. The trailing edge of 2 vertical tails is not parallel to the others. YF-23 4 reflected wave system. j-20 10 reflected wave system, 2 canards. As for the specific rcs value of j-20, it is hard to say. But what is certain is that it is stronger than f-35 and weaker than F-22. Because the J-20 has a smoother fuselage surface than the F-35 If you ask me which plane is better. Based on the information and inferences I have obtained personally. Removed the stealth paint, because the stealth paint is not easy to judge. J-20 is better. The F-22 aircraft is designed to be more stealthy but without dsi. It can’t be networked with other aircraft either. The speed is not as good as j-20 (Some people may not believe it, but I can explain that the engine of the F-22 was the strongest at that time, so the exterior design of the F-22 was biased towards subsonic maneuverability. The j-20 has better canard wings Lift and stability, because stability reduces drag, so it has better supersonic performance, the simplest explanation is that when gravity and lift completely overlap, everything is balanced, F-22 lift and stability have no J- 20 is high, so the drag increases, and the performance of the canard will be different due to different positions. For a canard with the same weight and area, the farther it is from the main wing, the higher the lift coefficient. The farther away from the main wing the same lift coefficient is, the smaller the area required , the smaller the area, the smaller the resistance, and the faster the speed, and the closer the rear end of the canard to the main wing, the better the maneuverability, but the smaller the lift, so it needs to increase the canard area to have lift, so the weight will be greater , the canard of the Rafale fighter is closer to the main wing, it has good maneuverability, but the lift coefficient is weaker than the j-20, the gust is 1.7, while the j-20 is 2.0. Many people always say that j-20 copied mig1.44 is a mistake Yes, their canard positions and fuselage layouts are all different, as long as there is a slight gap, a flight control system has to be remade and it takes a long time to test and collect data for various flight angles.) The average stealth of the F-35 is not as good as that of the J-20, and the fuselage is not smooth, but the difference is not big, because the J-20 has canards. The F-35 is a medium-sized fighter with a powerful engine, but it has only one engine, and the output power is smaller than that of the J-20. The radar scanning range and scanning intensity of the fighter depend on the power output of the engine. The radar material used by the j-20 is also the latest gallium nitride. It is the same as the F-35, so the radar of the j-20 will be stronger than that of the F-35 As for the electronic system, we can learn from Pakistan's j-10ce, which has helmet display, voice assistance, and voice commands. The degree of intelligence may be different, but I don't think the gap is fatal. The pl-15 missile of the J-20 on the missile will be stronger. Because the range is longer. Of course, it is unreasonable to speculate without comparing the stealth paint. But we are just ordinary people, it is impossible to know. There is no way to obtain it. I can only compare with the current fighter parameters. However, this also prompted the F35 to update the radar and develop a stronger f135 engine. It depends on whether the United States can accumulate experience on the F-35 and use it on the next generation of fighters. And the j-20 engine ws-15 has also started production, one engine has a thrust of 15 tons, and the acceleration thrust is 18 tons. Maintenance is 2000 hours. It's just not mass-produced yet. Because there is no production line.

[@MrTommy0201]

The f 35 is capable off destroying itself lol

[@diogo082]

You missed the year of deployment. It's crutial.

[@Ali_Srour]

Also the payload is important

[@justfrans2053]

That's a su30...not su35

[@nuru990]

TfX MMU ❤

[@mctyfun531]

Its not Rafa..el its Raf..ale.

[@fevzik98]

You have to add TF-X (MMU)

[@saiko-rz7jb]

TFX is only pre-model not real one

[@fevzik98]

@@saiko-rz7jb No, you are wrong TF-X is real and this is the first prototype kzbin.info/www/bejne/m3zCZaCohbCAhqc

[@saiko-rz7jb]

@@fevzik98 just moving on way, not flying.

[@fevzik98]

@@saiko-rz7jb It will fly in the end of this year

[@saiko-rz7jb]

@@fevzik98 That's right, so TFX is not yet to get in there. you know very well

[@speedpuppy638]

Statement: JAS39 Gripen E/F/NF is likely to be top two worlds complete fighter jet. It has E-Stealth and Gripen all ready ticks all boxes for NGADS 6th gen. The Gripen is only beaten by a margin by the F-22 in score, in the US training exercise RF. The F-22 is probably the worlds best Fighter Jet (if the weather approves)

[@tupcycle1]

do the Chinese planes come with an option to extend it's warranty?

[@energymf1991]

Australian experts have simulated the rcs of j-20. But it uses the most original j-20 in 2011 He uses the method of physical optics to simulate, but this method has limitations It just can't be simulated at all angles, and there are skins and stealth paints, which can't be simulated. And there is a certain gap between the simulated j-20 data and the real j-20. Under his simulation, The rcs value of the 12GHZ X-band radar j-20 looking down and looking up plus or minus 30 degrees is 0.01-0.0001. But the difference in the results is relatively large. Why I mentioned this person first is that many people in European and American countries do not believe that duck wings can be invisible. But in China, before designing the aircraft, it will simulate in a better way, and there are analysis articles, Under normal layout, There are no dsi intakes in all directions. 1.7ghz rcs average is from 0.035-0.047 Canard is 0.037-0.063- 5.6Ghz rcs average value is Regular layout 0.011-0.020 Canard layout 0.009-0.030 Why some canards have lower rcs. That's because when detecting from the side wing angle, the rear wing vertical tail and the horizontal tail of the conventional layout are basically in one position, which will form a secondary reflection. Of course, the canard will increase the rcs value a little bit, but it can be reduced by design. And there is not an insurmountable gap between the two sides in terms of stealth. In the early days of the United States, there were also aircraft with canard layout design. But the trapezoidal canard was used, and the trailing edge of the canard was slightly inclined outward. This effect is to scatter the trailing edge of the canard to the main wing, and use the scattering peak of the main wing to cover the radar scattering of the canard. J-20 because at the beginning of the design, China's engine is still very poor. So design canards The design adopts a dislocation parallel design. The front end of the canards of the j-20 is outward, and the rear end of the rear wing is inward. That is, the front end of the canard of j-20 is parallel to the rear end of the main wing. The rear end of the canard is parallel to the front end of the main wing. Taking into account the design of steering and stealth. So if you watch the J-20 video, when the canard is in its original position, the rear end of the canard is higher than the fuselage of the fighter In this regard, the gap with the conventional layout will be greater, compared to the canard front end. But the impact of the rcs gap is still very small. Because J-20 has a sawtooth treatment on the rear end of the canard, and uses the method of applying stealth paint with a honeycomb structure. Further reduce the rcs value As for the gap of the j-20 canard, Chengdu Aviation Institute simulated the radar test of the stealth paint in the gap of the canard, and the original position of the canard decreased from -33 decibels to -38 decibels. Without stealth paint it is -20 decibels to -21 decibels. Moreover, the j-20 design team also changed the angle of the front port above the air inlet to block the back and forth reflection waves formed by the gap between the canard and the fuselage. Of course, this paper is a simulation of the early data of j-20, and later j-20 has been revised As for the reflected wave formed by the outer corner of the rear end of the canard, it is enough to cut off a small part of the corner. And the radar reflection caused by the canard rotation. Only in the intense excitement of take-off and landing, close combat and evading missiles, the canards will rotate at a large angle. Even if a fighter with a conventional layout encounters this situation and turns, the rcs value will increase a lot, so there is no need to discuss the rcs value of canards in takeoff and landing, close combat and missile avoidance Moreover, the influence of the angle rsc value brought by the large-angle rotation of the canard will be better than that of the conventional layout fighter. The j-20 basically does not use canards in normal flight conditions, but uses other wings. So you can go to watch the video of j-20, the canards are basically not used. It is almost still at the original angle. The normal flight is only between 5 degrees The treatment method of the pelvic fin is much simpler, because the structural strength required by the pelvic fin is relatively small. J-20 directly uses copper-based memory metals that resist magnetism, composite skins, and wave-absorbing honeycomb materials to make ventral fins, which will not only not affect the stealth, but also reduce the stealth of the tail engine. Reduce side stealth and infrared radar detection . China has also tested the influence of the Rcs value of the engine nozzle. The F22 is the worst. The circular axisymmetric nozzle is better than the F22 nozzle. The best is the trapezoidal nozzle of the flying wing layout. But fighter jets need vector engines, and trapezoidal nozzles cannot be made. The nozzle of F22 is to reduce the infrared scanning. omnidirectional radar reflection F-22 has 8 reflected wave systems. Su-57 has 11 reflection wave systems, 2 inlet edges are not parallel to the wing, and 1 tail cone. F-35 has 10 reflected wave systems. The trailing edge of 2 vertical tails is not parallel to the others. YF-23 4 reflected wave system. j-20 10 reflected wave system, 2 canards. As for the specific rcs value of j-20, it is hard to say. But what is certain is that it is stronger than f-35 and weaker than F-22. Because the J-20 has a smoother fuselage surface than the F-35 If you ask me which plane is better. Based on the information and inferences I have obtained personally. Removed the stealth paint, because the stealth paint is not easy to judge. J-20 is better. The F-22 aircraft is designed to be more stealthy but without dsi. It can’t be networked with other aircraft either. The speed is not as good as j-20 (Some people may not believe it, but I can explain that the engine of the F-22 was the strongest at that time, so the exterior design of the F-22 was biased towards subsonic maneuverability. The j-20 has better canard wings Lift and stability, because stability reduces drag, so it has better supersonic performance, the simplest explanation is that when gravity and lift completely overlap, everything is balanced, F-22 lift and stability have no J- 20 is high, so the drag increases, and the performance of the canard will be different due to different positions. For a canard with the same weight and area, the farther it is from the main wing, the higher the lift coefficient. The farther away from the main wing the same lift coefficient is, the smaller the area required , the smaller the area, the smaller the resistance, and the faster the speed, and the closer the rear end of the canard to the main wing, the better the maneuverability, but the smaller the lift, so it needs to increase the canard area to have lift, so the weight will be greater , the canard of the Rafale fighter is closer to the main wing, it has good maneuverability, but the lift coefficient is weaker than the j-20, the gust is 1.7, while the j-20 is 2.0. Many people always say that j-20 copied mig1.44 is a mistake Yes, their canard positions and fuselage layouts are all different, as long as there is a slight gap, a flight control system has to be remade and it takes a long time to test and collect data for various flight angles.) The average stealth of the F-35 is not as good as that of the J-20, and the fuselage is not smooth, but the difference is not big, because the J-20 has canards. The F-35 is a medium-sized fighter with a powerful engine, but it has only one engine, and the output power is smaller than that of the J-20. The radar scanning range and scanning intensity of the fighter depend on the power output of the engine. The radar material used by the j-20 is also the latest gallium nitride. It is the same as the F-35, so the radar of the j-20 will be stronger than that of the F-35 As for the electronic system, we can learn from Pakistan's j-10ce, which has helmet display, voice assistance, and voice commands. The degree of intelligence may be different, but I don't think the gap is fatal. The pl-15 missile of the J-20 on the missile will be stronger. Because the range is longer. Of course, it is unreasonable to speculate without comparing the stealth paint. But we are just ordinary people, it is impossible to know. There is no way to obtain it. I can only compare with the current fighter parameters. However, this also prompted the F35 to update the radar and develop a stronger f135 engine. It depends on whether the United States can accumulate experience on the F-35 and use it on the next generation of fighters. And the j-20 engine ws-15 has also started production, one engine has a thrust of 15 tons, and the acceleration thrust is 18 tons. Maintenance is 2000 hours. It's just not mass-produced yet. Because there is no production line.

[@yamoto1833]

@@energymf1991interessante

[@bafattvahetere]

@@energymf1991 Piuh!

[@Naz_i206]

/*Adds KF-21 and FC-31 F/A-18E/F III and Jas-39E :💀💀

[@TheBritishBarman]

The BAE Tempest is going to blow the list away in a few years.

[@ianpodmore9666]

@@grimreaper4654 Me to and I will eat my left testicle if the UK can get it into production on our own. A few partners and its definitely possible. As the UK have done a lot of the groundwork it would make a lot of sense for others to benefit.

[@yamoto1833]

@@grimreaper4654how do you know?

[@TheBritishBarman]

@@Name_then_some_numbers Guess we have a short wait then.

[@H.P206]

And After that the FCAS is gonna blow the BAE from the list

[@VioletSilence]

Russian/American/Asian jets: beautiful. European jets: ugly. All of them: badass

[@MattMarshallUK]

Don't think you will find many people who find the Typhoon or Rafale to be ugly. I would say they are the best looking on this list, along with the SU-35

[@VioletSilence]

​@@MattMarshallUK Well, I happen to be just one of them. I like smooth, closely composed design of stealth jets like F-22 ad Su-57 way better.

[@MattMarshallUK]

@@VioletSilence I like the look of the F22/F35 but the SU-57 is too big for me. Proportions don't look right somehow.

[@VioletSilence]

@@MattMarshallUK - How buff our 5th gen jet should be, minister Shoigu? - Da, comrade.

[@im-a-mexican-knockedout-snorin]

All russian jets look the same, chinese are hideous and that's it

[@ioanbota9397]

Realy I like this advanced fighters jets

[@Dennan]

you should remove that russian fighter and add gripen E instead, russian stuff has shit camo and it probly gonna blow itself up.

[@FuturisticAge]

I heard from american pilots that f-35 is so-so

[@richardburgett3858]

Whomever authored this video is lacking in knowledge in that they do not know much about aircraft technology!!!

[@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020]

The F15ex is the best, except for the F35 and F22 of course

[@Jopino594]

Reminder that the F-35 has critical engine procurement issues and despite being in its procurement phase, less and less F-35s are available for missions and GAO estimates maintenance budgets need to QUADRUPLE in order to avoid having almost half of F-35s grounded by 2030 source: GAO-22-104678. Also, the F-35s sensor fusion, it's ''secret sauce'' has not yet been delivered and DoD has no estimate of the cost or date of delivery, only that it should come well after 2030. The F-35 cannot fly missions and will not be able to engage other aircraft until at least 2030, so why even talk about it now, why not talk about the future Space Force ships if were gonna talk about future stuff that doesn't exist yet?

[@karlkobler218]

this is quite possibly the dumbest response I've ever seen. Have a buddy who's a F-35 pilot. Everything you say is false.

[@Jopino594]

@@karlkobler218 Look at what's in the news today about the F-35 buddy. DoD finally admits the engine is shit and that they have to replace it but don't yet have a plan or even performance targets set for the new engine. ''The F-35’s current Pratt & Whitney engine is running twice as hot as it was designed-driving the aircraft to require maintenance earlier, which runs up program costs. “We have been eating into the life of this engine since the beginning of the program because we did under-spec the engine and its requirements,” F-35 Program Executive Officer Lt. Gen. Michael Schmidt said in a House Armed Services tactical air and land forces subcommittee hearing Wednesday. However, the Pentagon’s efforts to upgrade the F135 engine lack “key elements of a full business case to support decisions and are proceeding without requirements,” Jon Ludwigson, director of contracting and national security acquisitions at the Government Accountability Office, said during the hearing. Schmidt said that the program does have a power requirement, but said that GAO “makes a good point” that the service doesn’t know specifically what the “high-end margin” of power should be for the joint strike fighter. '' (I can't post links on YT so just copy paste a part on google and you'll find it.)

[@terozontondu]

more or less but the main issue is alot of f-35 pilots havent gotten used to flying them as they are still kinda new thats why a good bit of them have crashed not so much engine issues tho some of them do have issues thats why some were recalled for repairs

[@sivri_sinek]

F16 is the King of ALL ❤❤❤❤

[@user-hg7hy8lv1m]

Он король самоубийств!!!😂😂😂 Каждый 7 выпущенный ф-16 зарылся в землю!

[@caravaggio31]

Ridiculous: the Korean jet better than Su-57 and the absence of Gripen Jas 39E lol

[@guitarbam]

Where is F16i ?

[@IxNxI]

that we know of...

[@LoveMusic-bg7vu]

F22 raptor number one !!!

[@stalinliberator464]

God bless Russia and their amazing tech

[@emilsohn1671]

Yes

[@ilovethem9990]

Russia acts like they have these things but we all know it's smoke and mirrors, for example where are the Armata Tanks (best in the world). They are so bad they can't actually fight. Hahah yes God bless Russia.

[@bafattvahetere]

Russian planes are built for the red square parades. After this Ukranian war they will make them in papier mache´.

[@GuzzanDj]

I'm Swedish so I might be biased but for sure I thought Jas 39 should be on the list? Or am I missing something?

[@user-fp2gr4ic3x]

Yes you are! the whole list is the firs ever with not the raptor in first place. But to be fair! Gripen c which i supose they compare with is not as good as the E modell, but before we got a significant numbers of them some other planes is doing better. on my list the gripen c would be at no 12 or somewhere around it. Its very good but i have seen a lot of dcs videos where its chanceless against rafale eurofighter when the pilots are equlity good!!!! Vi får helt enkelt erkänna att vist är det ett bra plan, men ett litet land som vårt, ska vi va stolta över att nästan komma in på tionde plats vilket vi ofta gör på andra listor. misstänker att vissa videos är betaldda av i detta fall kina osv...Vi borde lära oss av ukraina o skaffa många drönar och mer artilleri istället för superdyra plan som kan skjutas ner av en manpad tex...

[@Rohit-cj6eb]

Su57 speed is faster than f22

[@danielxiong7227]

SU-57 can’t even supercruise as F22. Less advanced than F22.

[@Rohit-cj6eb]

@@danielxiong7227 lol su57M can supercruise upto 1.6 mach While f22 can at 1.5 mach

[@danielxiong7227]

@@Rohit-cj6eb F22 can supercruise up to Mach 2.25 without use of burners. 😂😂. Countries don’t buy SU-57 but instead bought F35. 😂😂

[@Rohit-cj6eb]

@@danielxiong7227 😂 f22 max speed is 2.25 mach with using afterburner You don't even know the definition of supercruise😂 And no one buy f35 yet lol

[@danielxiong7227]

@@Rohit-cj6eb LMAO Why don’t you search up countries that brought F35. 😂🤣 Russian airforce is trashed compared to American AirPower.

[@emanuelfaria2377]

Were is the gripen is better than eurofighter

[@rafale040]

wtf why F-22 is the first stealth fighter? I thought it was F-117

[@artiefakt4402]

F-117 isn't a fighter

[@Ali_Srour]

​@@artiefakt4402 true, it is an attack aircraft

[@ZIVELA_SRBIJA_2024]

Зато што је Србска војска 99-е са застарелим совјетским ПВО системом С-125 Нева оборила 3 америчка ф-117а јер су били толико невидљиви, да их нисмо ни видели, исто је и 2017-е сиријска војска оборила ф-35 са старим системом С-250 итд, толико о њиховој напредној технологији и невидљивости, а о томе што се сами руше при полетању и забадању у земљу и падању у море, да и не говорим!!!! 🤔🧐🫣😉😎☝️👆👉👍💪👊🤜📡🛰️🚀🛩️✈️🛸🚀💥🏳️‍🌈🇺🇲🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈👌👎👋🤫😁😂🤣😎😉🤗👍💪🍀❤️🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸💕🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💕🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💕🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🥰☺️

[@arthurwilliam3199]

F35 Big joke 😂

[@drbendover7467]

The Su57 is not a stealth aircraft it's only stealth by name because it shows up on raider like a fourth generation fighter:)

[@thefreemonk6938]

Raider? Do you mean radar?

[@primi_tabletku]

Странно, что ты знаешь больше, чем страна производитель. Может ты и кино снимаешь? Может теперь у тебя и разрешение в туалет надо спрашивать?

[@GrandioseDollar]

Did it show up on your radar?

[@thuydoan7496]

It's true, the SU-57 does not have true stealth capability because it's engine gives off heat signature. The F-22 has better thrust nozzles that does not give off heat signature thereby giving it true stealth capability.

[@lexxsharingan1506]

@@thuydoan7496 The "special nozzles" of the Raptor perfectly designate it in night vision devices, and even more so in the IR-range.

[@murtzakambo6594]

Make a video on all Pakistani tanks in details please

[@champaberiasub4809]

Most advanced but not most capable in war.

[@souvikmandal46]

There are 18 SU57 available. Maverick destroyed three.

[@Ali_Srour]

😂✔️

[@Nightwing01010]

Umm Grippen?

[@andyw3152]

Good luck to Russia attempting to do anything with the SU-57!!

[@alfredoelbombo3423]

Bro, SU35, Rafale and Eurofighter are way better then the F15 AND The F22 is way better then the F35 and the F35 is better then the Chengdu! From where do you have this Infos!?^^

[@Joemensa]

The single most important factor in the lethality of contemporary aircraft is not the hardware or the software as they all have their strengths and weaknesses, but rather the training and capabilities of the pilot at the stick.

[@PurpleDreki]

Switch F-22 and F-35.