@The Buzz, you forgot that the Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carriers are the most advanced and largest aircraft carriers in the world.
@bigwillyj40836 ай бұрын
The power of the carrier isn't just the carrier but the entire carrier group. Usually more aircraft than a small country and a major surface battle group.
@jonny29546 ай бұрын
There is a joke in Moscow: "According to Putin the special military operation is really a conflict between Russia and NATO about World dominance. Whats the situation now?" "Russia has lost 100,000 troops, 9 generals, 3000 tanks, 11 ships, 300 planes and 8000 trucks. NATO hasn't arrived yet."
@jonny29546 ай бұрын
Bluds be losing against 0.2% of NATOs equipment. Actually insane.
@gilgarcia30086 ай бұрын
You need to update your figures on russian losses.
@SwordManVX6 ай бұрын
Lol. NATO has not arrived yet, but the destroyed NATO equipment has been on display in Moscow for a long time, it is amazing!
@christosbekas74466 ай бұрын
Question Hamas used western weapons against Israel last October which country sell them i will help you is not russia
@golagiswatchingyou29666 ай бұрын
Lol
@johnsilver93386 ай бұрын
You forgot the most important workhorse with Aegis ships including Burke destroyers. They are the only ships to have BMD radars. And maritime P-8 Poseidon besides AWACS these are very important ISR platforms.
@Павел-ь2ш2с6 ай бұрын
The deputy head of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Sergei Ryabkov, admitted the possibility that the Russian side would go for a military-technical response to the actions of the American authorities in connection with the attack on Sevastopol.
@Petej676 ай бұрын
Where was French aircraftcarrier?
@KairAlzahir5 ай бұрын
Yeah, the "Charles de Gaule" is usually considered WAY better then the Queen Elizabeth (not even a nuclear AC is it ?), so why put one and not the other ? isn't it suppose to be the "15 Most Powerful" ?
@moodogco3 ай бұрын
@@KairAlzahirbecause it isn't better then the queen elizabeth as being nuclear powered doesn't make up for the fact its smaller, carrys less advanced jets & numbers of jets then the fact its 30 plus yrs old 😂
@KairAlzahir3 ай бұрын
@@moodogco I'm not an expert, far from it, but I've read more then once that past the pure "size" and "carry capacity", des QE is in fact not such a good Aircraft carrier for multiple reasons. And Yes, one of them is the non-nuclear powered engines. An aircraft carrier is most important to "project power" over long distances and for an extended period of time, this is the entire purpous of a carrier right ? Caus if you're near your coasts, you might as well use land bases no ? Also, I've heard that Aircraft carriers with no catapults limits 1. The type of plane that can take off 2. limits the weight of the plane armements, 3. limits the range of the planes taking off (catapults = less fuel usage at take off. Then again, I'm no expert, just heard multiple times that the HMS QE was sort of good on paper, but not that great of a ship in the real world compared to others. I wonder if I have not heard a British official talk about the mistake that was made ordering this (but dont take my word on that.)...
@moodogco3 ай бұрын
@@KairAlzahir yh well starters they never alone & 1 of ships that's always with the QE aircraft carriers is a fuel replenishment ship so keeps them going & with have all the over seas naval bases like Gibraltar, Qatar etc so they're designed with that in mind. Secondly all the power & wiring & infrastructure all ready to install on a planned mid life modernization as something that was always planned from the beginnings as if go on the royal navy youtube channel they've got in a video all about it so a lot of point ain't correct from what I've learnt from looking into it. It's not as bad as u think!!!
@Juergen02025 ай бұрын
Nice ranking, but still a lot missing. A lot was already commented, like Gerald F. Ford Class, French Carriers, Helo Carriers, US Navy Destroyers, Nuke Submarines and so on. Supposed, that F-18 Super Hornet and "all" Marines Equipment was summarized under "the Carriers", I'd like to mention F-15 E Strike Eagle (as big brother of F-16), A-10 (as big brother of Apache) and F-35, yet not available in large numbers, but ordered by many NATO countries. And of course, if you mention B-52, also name B-1 and B-2. There's still more, but so far so good.
@person-ie4px6 ай бұрын
If Russia were not a monarchy and if it were not Orthodox, I would be pro Russian.
@bennuredjedi6 ай бұрын
What about the Challenger,Charles de Gaulle Cavour Juan Carlos Karel Dorman the Albion’s Rafale Harriers AH1z AW129 , CV90 Arielle Dardo Centauro 2 plus all of the other equipment not mentioned,smh
@moodogco6 ай бұрын
Yh the queen elizabeth aircraft carrier can carry a minimum of 48 f35, 72 overall & more in surge mode 90 plus. Its also the most advanced with most modern systems but just isn't nuclear powered which doesn't make it any less advanced
@frank-ko6de3 ай бұрын
Yeah, the flat empty surfaces of the Queen Elizabeth Carriers are really those 48 f35s you can't afford , in disguise. Hahahaha.
@USSMaineBB-956 ай бұрын
Technically Gearld R Ford with John F Kennedy are the most advanced and largest Aircraft Carrier's with Enterprise (CVN-80) is the process of being constructed There’s also the Burke Destroyer's and the P-8 Poseidon
@zagrepcanin826 ай бұрын
what about weapons NATO has but we dont know of? very very advanced weapons
@JeanGoalin2 ай бұрын
Very Anglo-Saxon point of view: nuclear aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle? SNLE nuke class triumphant? Dassault Rafale? ICBM M51?
@nickduf4 ай бұрын
The 2 British aircraft carriers do not carry any aircraft and run on fuel oil 🤨
@palacete6 ай бұрын
Among those already on the list, my list of the best: Tank: Leopard. Leopard is robust, although in general I don't like NATO tanks, but the Japanese one with the automatic loader would be better because it weighs about 50 tons and has the automatic loader with ammunition in the back of the tank. - The Abrams has a jet engine that creates a heat signature that makes it easily recognizable on the battlefield, it is very expensive and bogs down easily. IFV: The Bradley... has already been fully proven in Ukraine and has a good combat reputation. Jets: F-16 and the JAS-39, nothing that is very expensive is really useful in a war of attrition. Eurofighter is expensive without being better, it's just expensive, the F-35 is very expensive too. Best plane: B-52. It was created at a time when American industry was at its peak, with all of SGM's experience. The plane is so good that is 80 years old, but still good.
@JoshuaHistoryBuff6 ай бұрын
Get your facts straight it bogs down easily? Oh yea that JET TURBINE is gutless compared to other tanks…🤨
@davecoyle9414Ай бұрын
Its fine having all this awesome weaponry, But maybe we should think a bit like Russians. Build thousands of good basic artillery. Billions of drones and millions of missiles. Also millions of dumb glide bombs. The age of the drone is here, they will get far more advanced for sure. Good armour to move troops. Most of all, make it all simple.
@terencescovell20826 ай бұрын
B2 b21 Spirit and raider😮
@sasith30006 ай бұрын
B21 Raider didn't enter to service yet
@nickduf4 ай бұрын
Anglo-American propaganda, France must once again leave this thing with all its equipment and all its soldiers!! I have not seen the Charles de Gaulle nuclear aircraft carrier, not seen the Rafale, not seen the Leclerc tank, not our nuclear attack and missile launcher submarines, not seen the M51 missile, etc., etc, on the other hand I have seen the two British Titanics which run on oil without planes and they will certainly never have any! 😂
@AlejandroMartinez-zl2yu6 ай бұрын
😃Wow Buzz this is NATO😃
@midhunbs19795 ай бұрын
F35?
@palacete6 ай бұрын
Good news is that the tanks have already arrived in Moscow, but not in the way they wanted 😅
i like your voice so much but this game is so dagereos. kiss from croaia, middle europe
@SamHolmes-mw3qx5 ай бұрын
Russia has sarmat.
@EmarElutin4 ай бұрын
NATO has Trident,stealth bombers and thousands of stealth fighter jets.😂😂😂
@raphaela.e.slebigre77675 ай бұрын
Also, what are objectively the criterias for this video? Everything is just subjective and floats nowhere.
@sasith30006 ай бұрын
B2 spirit , F 22 raptor, F35 Lightning 2 , B1 lancer , F15, USS Gerald R. Ford air craft carriers , HIMARS rocket launcher ?
@Matt.Willoughby6 ай бұрын
AIM120 , Patriot PAC2, NASAM, Excalibur, Virginia class SSN, M777 Why does India buy Russian weapons?
@sasith30006 ай бұрын
@@Matt.Willoughby S 400 is better than patriot. India has 3 S400s. Also Indian su 30 s have destroyed 8 Pakistani f16s in dog fights. Also any air defense system in Nato can't stop iskandar missiles. USA and Russia have different design philosophies . In some fields us is better than Russia and some fields Russia is better than use.
@bigwillyj40836 ай бұрын
@@sasith3000the S-400 are being destroyed by Atacms left and right. Patriot destroyed all of the Kinzhal and Iskander fired at it. Please tell me again how S-400 is better? It is deadlier for its crew.
@bigwillyj40836 ай бұрын
@@sasith3000read a newspaper not posts by idiots.
@sasith30006 ай бұрын
@@bigwillyj4083 when we consider about range , accuracy and cost s400 is better than patriot. Ukrane couldn't destroy any hypersonic missiles deployed by russia. Ukraine accepted that. Also patriot destroyed by iskandar missile. S400 have some vulnerabilities like heavily rely on long range radars. Another thing , ukraine deployed hundreds of missiles to russia but one missile cause to fire in building , all other missiles were intercepted by Russian air defense systems. Turkey is a Nato country then they can easily buy patriots. Also turkey was a member of f35 project which only involved closest allies. But instead of buy patriots , turkey bought s 400 s. Ask from some Turkish to why they bought s400s instead of patriots.
@regentcollege5266 ай бұрын
Why was NATO formed?
@bigwillyj40836 ай бұрын
To protect small countries against soviet aggression. Now it protects us against the aggression of the Soviet wannabe.
@tinashevictorsibanda26755 ай бұрын
to fight one guy russia lol
@venator48386 ай бұрын
This includes a lot of very questionable choices. Pretty much everything I'd say.
@albertf.26396 ай бұрын
LOL !@ I THINK YOU NEED TO BE UPDATE ON USA CARRIER, THEY NOW HAVE 13 G.R FORD, R,J. KENNEDY, DD EISENHOWER GET YOU FACT STRAIT & ON TIME 4 YEARS BEHIND #@!
@graemepeters57176 ай бұрын
How is the Ukrainian Army doing? More than 2,300 UA troops were added to the demilitarised scoreboard today. Another 2,000+ were added yesterday. At this rate, Ukraine will lose 10% of its army in the next month! - and another 10% the following month!
@frank-ko6de6 ай бұрын
Great, let's see where we are at in one month and let's who's remaining beside your nonsense propaganda, you Ridiculous potato alcohol drinking nonsense.
@Roman498375 ай бұрын
The largest Air Force in the world: The US Air Force. The second largest Air Force in the world: The US NAVY 😁
@krishnakumar-yw7fm6 ай бұрын
It's an joke Russia is very power full country 😅😅
@maxvonkrieger94326 ай бұрын
Russia is very powerfull
@frank-ko6de6 ай бұрын
Full of pig scented excrement. Hahahaha.
@bigwillyj40836 ай бұрын
Yeah it nearly killed its entire invasion force and the mobilised troops of last year. New mobilisation coming and the weapons went from T-62 last year to Chinese golf buggy this year.
@graemepeters57176 ай бұрын
How is that Western equipment doing? Lets look at today's Daily Briefing for military commanders at the Kremlin: Russian Defence Ministry report on the progress of the special military operation (25 June 2024) The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces continued to engage in active combat operations and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the AFU 36th Marines Brigade, 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade, and 71st Jaeger Brigade near Volchansk, Ternovaya, and Tikhoye (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 235 Ukrainian troops, two motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, two 152-mm D-20 howitzers, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. Units of the Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions, as well as inflicted losses on formations of the AFU 14th, 54th, and 66th mechanised brigades near Petropavlovka, Sinkovka (Kharkov region), Platonovka (Donetsk People's Republic), and Makeyevka (Lugansk People's Republic). The AFU losses amounted to up to 445 Ukrainian troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzer, one 152-mm D-20 howitzer, one 122-mm 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, and one U.S.-made 105-mm M119 howitzer. In addition, one AFU ammunition depot has been destroyed. Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front lines and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the AFU 72nd Mechanised Brigade, 46th, and 81st airmobile brigades near Konstantinovka and Kurakhovo (Donetsk People's Republic). The AFU losses amounted to up to 830 Ukrainian troops, two armoured personnel carriers, seven motor vehicles, two U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzers, one U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzer, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, one U.S.-made 105-mm M119 howitzer, and one electronic warfare station. Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions, as well as inflicted losses on formations of the AFU 24th Mechanised Brigade and 2nd Territorial Defence Brigade near Toretsk and Mikhailovka (Donetsk People's Republic). Three counter-attacks launched by AFU units were repelled. The AFU losses amounted to up to 560 Ukrainian troops, one tank, eight motor vehicles, three U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzers, three 152-mm Msta-B howitzers, one 152-mm D-20 howitzer, and three 122-mm D-30 howitzers. Units of the Vostok Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the AFU 128th Territorial Defence Brigade near Velikaya Novosyolka (Donetsk People's Republic). The AFU losses amounted to more than 150 Ukrainian troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, one UK-made 155-mm FH-70 howitzer, one 152-mm 2A65 Msta-B howitzer, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. Units of the Dnepr Group of Force delivered strikes at manpower and hardware of the AFU 35th Marines Brigade near Ivanovka (Kherson region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 125 Ukrainian troops, five motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, one 152-mm D-20 howitzer, one 122-mm D-30 howitzer, and one U.S.-made 105-mm M109 howitzer. Operational-Tactical and Army Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Groups of Forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation destroyed two AFU materiel depots, one P-18 air target detection and tracking radar station, as well as engaged manpower and military hardware in 128 areas. Air defence units shot down 79 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles and four U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles.
@757Poppy6 ай бұрын
Right 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@graemepeters57176 ай бұрын
@@757Poppy Don't you find it interesting that the Daily Briefings for more than two years, EXACTLY match the events on the ground? However, the b/s from Kiev, the Ghost of Kiev, the Snake Island Martyrs, the stats from the UA, DON'T?
@757Poppy6 ай бұрын
@@graemepeters5717 Moskva?
@graemepeters57176 ай бұрын
@@757Poppy Antonov!
@graemepeters57176 ай бұрын
@@757Poppy Demilitarised scoreboard for the week - 13,820!!! Russian Defence Ministry report on the progress of the special military operation (22 - 28 June 2024) From 22 June to 28 June 2024, the Russian Armed Forces have carried out 17 group strikes with high-precision weapons and attack unmanned aerial vehicles. Enemy energy facilities, infrastructure of military airfields, logistics centres for storing weapons delivered by Western countries to the AFU, as well as assembly and storage facilities for attack unmanned aerial vehicles and uncrewed boats. Temporary deployment areas of AFU troops and foreign mercenaries have been also hit. Over the past week, the units of the Sever Group of Forces continued to advance into the depths of the enemy defence and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of three formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one marine brigade, and three territorial defence brigades. The AFU losses were up to 1,560 Ukrainian troops, 12 armoured fighting vehicles, and 43 motor vehicles. In the course of counter-battery warfare, 33 field artillery guns, including seven foreign-made howitzers, three Nota electronic warfare stations, Bukovel-AD, and two U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery radar stations have been eliminated. The units of the Zapad Group of Forces have improved the tactical situation and inflicted fire damage on four mechanised and two tank brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as on two territorial defence brigades. Six counter-attacks of AFU assault detachments have been repelled. The AFU losses were up to 3,230 Ukrainian troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 40 motor vehicles, three Grad MLRS combat vehicles, 24 field artillery guns, six of them were U.S.-made. In addition, three U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 and AN/TPQ-37 counter-battery warfare radars, as well as 11 field ammunition depots have been destroyed. The units of the Yug Group of Forces have liberated Razdolovka (Donetsk People's Republic) and seized more advantageous lines. The strikes have been delivered at manpower and hardware of the three mechanised, two airmobile, and two air assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The AFU losses were up to 4,410 Ukrainian troops, two tanks, eight armoured fighting vehicles, 48 motor vehicles, and 39 field artillery guns, including 11 U.S.-made M777 and M198 howitzers. In addition, seven Anklav, Bukovel electronic warfare stations, and 25 field ammunition depots have been destroyed. The units of the Tsentr Group of Forces have improved the situation along the front line and defeated units of four mechanised, two infantry formations of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades. Enemy 39 counter-attacks have been repelled in this direction during the week. The AFU losses were up to 2950 troops, three tanks, six armoured fighting vehicles, including two U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 30 motor vehicles, and 42 field artillery guns, including six U.S.-made M777 howitzers. The units of the Vostok Group of Forces have improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, three formations of the Territorial Defence and two National Guard brigades. The AFU losses were up to 930 Ukrainian troops, six armoured fighting vehicles, 36 motor vehicles, and 19 field artillery guns, including six UK-made FH-70 howitzers. The units of the Dnepr Group of Forces have defeated units of two formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and three brigades of the Ukrainian Territorial Defence. The AFU losses were up to 740 Ukrainian troops, three tanks, two armoured fighting vehicles, 48 motor vehicles, and 23 field artillery guns, 11 of them were foreign-made. ? In addition, eight Anklav, Bukovel electronic warfare stations, and six ammunition depots have been destroyed. Operational-Tactical Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have destroyed six M142 HIMARS multiple-launch rocket system launchers, one M270 MLRS launcher, and one transport and loader vehicle together with foreign specialists who ensured their use, as well as three P-18 air target detection and tracking radars. Air defence facilities have shot down two Ukrainian Air Force's MiG-29 aircraft, 589 unmanned aerial vehicles, six U.S.-made ATACMS operational-tactical missiles, eight U.S.-made Patriot anti-aircraft guided missiles, one U.S.-made HARM anti-radiation missile, and 61 U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, Czech-made Vampire and Olkha projectiles. Over the past week, 56 Ukrainian servicemen have surrendered on the line of contact.