This channel needs to be bigger. This is a really high quality educational video
@Trotskisty5 жыл бұрын
It takes time for any channel to reach 'critical mass'. So success for a good 'product' entails just doggedly sticking at it...
@NoobMaster-or2jf5 жыл бұрын
You explained in 13 minutes what I took 1 week to understand. Please make more videos!
@ibknl19865 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation. Your channel definitely deserves more views. All the best
@ZarawarGill-cm6fy Жыл бұрын
This is one of the best explanation videos I have ever seen I honestly don’t understand how you can have such little views I honestly hope you become a bigger channel
@omsingharjitАй бұрын
3:49 but for Fusion confinement time is also required and this puls is extremely short so why it will help for Fusion?
@audreyzeng44596 ай бұрын
love this channel and love your humor. i've been on laser youtube for the past two weeks and your channel is my favorite so far
@rumbepack4 жыл бұрын
this video it's incredibly convoluted, and only fulfils the promise in the title in the last 4rd of the video.
@mateolaguna65425 жыл бұрын
This is an amazing video!!! Easy to understand, thank you.
@daguaishouxd4 жыл бұрын
You totally deserve more follows. The videos are gold!
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@rhiannonlarsen58052 жыл бұрын
Such an excellent simplistic overview explanation of CPA! This should be the precursor to reading any journal articles on the topic! I know I will be using this to explain CPA to students and colleagues in the future! Thanks and well done 👍
@petevenuti7355 Жыл бұрын
Yes , please talk about how they did it, please explain Q, and all those other things you didn't think we would be interested in.... Do you think I could use a nitrogen laser to pump a hydrogen plasma to do something similar? At what power level does air become a nonlinear medium?
@davefoc Жыл бұрын
Do Ursula Keller's discoveries/inventions fit into this somewhere? Keller is credited with the development of SESAMs.
@debrachambers13042 жыл бұрын
Naming a LASER Icarus is asking for something to go wrong
@InfiniteUniverse884 жыл бұрын
The Higgs Boson particle was detected in 2012. The LHC technical design was approved in 1995. How much have lasers improved since then? What is the smallest possible particle accelerator, using current technology, which can detect the Higgs Boson?
@doncarlos88364 жыл бұрын
how do they measure this short pulse? these speeds are beyond electronics.
@olternaut3 жыл бұрын
This stuff is fascinating! I want to learn more about USPL technology.
@TheIrishYoshi2 жыл бұрын
Great video, fantastic info and really high quality. Basically helped me write most of my assignment, so thank you
@Andratos954 жыл бұрын
Btw, 1:55 is incorrect... 1 watt means literally 1 joule PER SECOND. So, to say that you have 1 watt in a femtosecond makes no sense (at least not in the way you want). You should instead say that "1 Joule in a femtosecond is..."
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
The video is correct and it is in some sense the entire point of the video. If we assume that energy is conserved in the CPA beam shortening process then, since energy is power x time, compressing a, say, 1 second pulse to a femtosecond pulse increases the pulse peak power of that pulse by 15 order of magnitude. That's why you do it in the first place, to obtain extremely high optical powers... if only for the briefest fraction of a second.
@Andratos953 жыл бұрын
@@atomsandsporks6760 But it's the compression of an ENERGY of 1 Joule into a femtosecond which increases the power from 1 Watt (which is 1 J/s) to 10^15 Watts (or 1J/fs), I think... A Watt is a derived unit, defined as 1 Joule/1 second. Therefore I don't think it makes sense to talk about watts/s, as this would be J/s² which I don't know if it has any valuable physical signficance.
@aantoine58195 жыл бұрын
These are some good videos , I wouldn't mind seeing a vicpdeo on how the compressor works
@InfiniteUniverse884 жыл бұрын
Powerful enough lasers can make the cold war obsolete. If stealth planes can be detected, and hypersonic missiles can be shot down, then the world will be a much more peaceful place. The only way to have world peace is to put an end to the arms race, to have one uncontested superpower.
@aantoine58194 жыл бұрын
@@InfiniteUniverse88 what?
@InfiniteUniverse884 жыл бұрын
@@aantoine5819 That was my way of agreeing that they're good videos.
@georgewbushcenterforintell1474 жыл бұрын
U could use this on a solar light sail instead of a cw laser
@PhantomKING1134 жыл бұрын
10/10, love it, continue like this!
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@marthareddy95543 жыл бұрын
Fantastically made simple
@deadeye_john3 жыл бұрын
Is the amount of photons in a pulse stay the same during chirping?
@atomsandsporks67603 жыл бұрын
Some day I plan on doing a video about how the concept of photons is used and abused and often not worth the effort as a mental picture. It is almost always a far better mental picture to abolish the word "photon" entirely and instead say "quanta of an electromagnetic (EM) wave/field". They ultimately mean the same thing, but your intuition is going to be correct far more often if you go into things with the latter idea. So you have some travelling EM pulse that gets stretched out along the axis in which is travelling forward. However, if you add up all the energy in the wave, added up over the full pulse, that must either be the same or less than before, after chirping. "Less than" because there could be absorption of light during the process. If you want to talk about "quantas of the EM field" (i.e. "photons") then at any point you can imagine breaking that wave up into its component sine waves. You can do this with any wave, break it up like this, it's called "Fourier decomposition". Then when you've got the full field as just a sum of a bunch of different sine waves a "photon" is the recognition that the intensity or amplitude of each of those sine wave can only change in clumps. Each can only ratcheted up or down in strength by discrete amounts. The number of quanta at a given moment depends on the wave's shape and the total intensity of each of these sine waves that are needed to add up to make it and changes completely from moment to moment if the shape of the pulse changes. Energy must be conserved (assuming no absorption) but there is no notion of "conservation of photons" in physics.
@deadeye_john3 жыл бұрын
@@atomsandsporks6760 Sorry I meant to say, "Does every photon in the regular laser pulse get chairped? Like turn 10 photons into 10 gamma ray photons?".
@tablab1654 жыл бұрын
Very cool science! The only part I'm opposed to is nuking Yeller. So many people seem to have it out for the old boy.
@rationalist7 Жыл бұрын
Still tough for me to comprehend what you are explaining
@demoncloud61472 жыл бұрын
You can do 'Tight Beam' communication in space too
@RedBCPride824 жыл бұрын
What if that laser pulsed one time in your eye? Would our brain even register what happened while the eye gets damaged?
@John-ht4xv5 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@KTHKUHNKK4 жыл бұрын
Super cool and powerful stuff.
@Gief18PlusVids3 жыл бұрын
Your videos are great.
@Andratos954 жыл бұрын
Wait... You're the guy from 3Blue1Brown?
@edwardgrigoryan39822 жыл бұрын
Stupendously well done!!
@Mr0rris02 жыл бұрын
Whole thing is the brain child of acoustic levitation/Egypt territory and underwater night vision. Cool stuff Make lightning throw a ping pong ball on a wave like kamikaze silver surfer
@lambda49314 жыл бұрын
I thought the chirp was the result of a beat frequency .
@eigendyaksson4909 Жыл бұрын
Неправда, первыми изобрели лазер Басов и Прохоров) Мэйман лишь довел его до того вида, который мы видим сегодня, он даже не получил Нобелевскую премию
@sto27794 жыл бұрын
1:45 - WTF.............
@sukaisnaini18434 жыл бұрын
amazing
@sadface74574 жыл бұрын
If you had a powerful enough lazer you could create an accelerator just from the photo electric effect.
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
I mean, the FIRST particle accelerator were cathode ray tubes (CRTs, like those used in old televisions) where electrons are accelerated by the electric field between two plates. Electrons are ejected from one plate (really a coil) by thermal emission (i.e. it was a hot wire) but one could also just as easily use photoelectric emission.
@sadface74574 жыл бұрын
@@atomsandsporks6760 It is remarkable that you can concentrate the power of lazer due to its negative temperature. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_temperature#Lasers
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
@@sadface7457 Well actually if you DIDN'T have negative temperature in the electron system then you wouldn't be lasing at all! Population inversion is a key part of the whole lasing process.
@smokey042004204 жыл бұрын
Laser guns!
@InfiniteUniverse884 жыл бұрын
Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing are working on that. #AmericaFirst
@undernetjack3 жыл бұрын
This 'chirp' high energy pulse sounds like the are making laser guns. LaZER GuNZ.
@Helica123 Жыл бұрын
haha its funny to hear about optics in such a different view (as an optics major)
@remomaurya72935 жыл бұрын
Good
@zoozolplexOne Жыл бұрын
cool !!!
@brandonwhittle6762Ай бұрын
you didnt mention grating doesnt bosst the peak this is misleading
@kricketflyd1114 жыл бұрын
They should have called it... a pinch laser
@atomsandsporks67604 жыл бұрын
But now we have the fun of guessing whether someone is talking about an accountant or an ultra-high-powered laser. It's the little things in life.
@bhagyeshshiyani24906 ай бұрын
honestly, very confusing explaination. making the explaination more complex by chewing the things. explaination is way different than the Video "TITLE"
@ThomasLee1233 жыл бұрын
There is no such word in English as “nu-ku-lar”. How do we trust your science if you don’t know the words you use?