Thanks for sharing, really simple and clean explanation. Short as Sharp as you recommend!
@DanGalletta4 ай бұрын
My pleasure Hugo!
@NikSept148 ай бұрын
Amazing as always, a request, could you make a video on flow of the presentation in the sense that how to decide the order of the slides to make sure they flow like a logical story (apart from the SCQA framework)
@DanGalletta8 ай бұрын
Great suggestion, I'll add it to the list 😊
@adam186326 күн бұрын
What about slides we background, scope, or timeliness? Are these perhaps already action titled?
@DanGalletta24 күн бұрын
You can create a section called "background" and the slides within that section can still have action titles
@leonidas76927 ай бұрын
Using the OODA loop is the most effective way to develop the action titles. If a title is not a clear observation that the business cares about, orientation is does not fit with the system of thinking at the client, decision options and tradeoffs are not clear or an action that is not SMART, don’t bother with the slide.
@healthadvice30917 ай бұрын
hi dan, does this apply this in thesis presentation?
@DanGalletta7 ай бұрын
I don’t see why not! 👍🏼
@Scoobi_Doo027 күн бұрын
Amazing content, thank you for sharing your knowledge. I have one tiny question, where do we put "Now What" like recommendation in the same slide as the stakeholder wants to see the recommendation on the same slide. Thanks again
@DanGalletta26 күн бұрын
Sorry mate I am not sure what you mean?
@wadoku243 ай бұрын
Dear Dan, I am happy to be person # 1000 to like this video,- this is really well done, thanks a lot! BTW, also loved the SCQR / SCR video!
@DanGalletta3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! Can’t believe it got 1,000 likes!
@jimmykez30669 ай бұрын
Just want to say thank you for sharing your knowledge. Please keep going! You deserve more subscribers for your quality content!
@DanGalletta9 ай бұрын
Really appreciate that mate, thank you!
@prasancma2 ай бұрын
Very helpful..also how did you do the chart ? Could you pls help explain
@DanGalletta2 ай бұрын
I used a PowerPoint add on called think-cell
@LaurieCawthorn4 ай бұрын
significant key words, suggest, imply, indicates, refer, point to , associate..The term “implication” refers to the indirect consequences or effects that result from a specific action or any statement.
@POWERPOINTUNIVERSITYINC7 ай бұрын
very useful information. keep up the good work
@DanGalletta7 ай бұрын
Thanks heaps!
@Scarlett.R7 ай бұрын
This is awesome. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. Definitely will help me create more engaging presentations with stronger story lines.
@DanGalletta7 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful Scarlett!
@metroidprimedude2 жыл бұрын
Great tips! 100% agree this is the 80 for the 20 if trying to improve a deck!
@DanGalletta2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tom, appreciate it!
@dougb86794 ай бұрын
Dan, this is really useful stuff ("Subscribed"!). Would you say that there are specific types of presentation (mostly data-based) that are well suited to the McKinsey (pyramid, SCR) format, but others (e.g. teaching) maybe not so much? Any advice as to what to use when? Thanks!
@DanGalletta4 ай бұрын
Hmm maybe! Most of my experience is with corporate reports, so I tend to use SCR in almost all situations. And thanks for the sub! 😊
@DanGalletta2 жыл бұрын
Take 10% off our courses, PowerPoint templates, and consulting toolkits by using the code KZbin10 at: www.slidescience.co/products
@R72Investments2 ай бұрын
Hi Dan, once again an excellent video. I also always had trouble coming up with meaningful action titles. Not anymore. I now do the action title thing as follows: I imagine I'm talking to someone about something and don't have a slide to hand, but I want to convey a key message to the other person. With reference to your first slide (time 1:11), I would explain the following to my conversation partner: "Publicly and privately funded acute care Hospitals is the largest turnover and fastest growing segment in healthcare." Just imagine a normal conversation, then the action title is obvious.
@DanGalletta2 ай бұрын
That's a really cool way to think about it! Thanks for sharing, I'm sure others will love this tip
@michaelshultz55844 ай бұрын
Thanks for your knowledge. This will help with two projects I am working on that I have to present to our HOA.
@DanGalletta4 ай бұрын
My pleasure Michael
@dihettАй бұрын
Just found and love your channel.
@DanGallettaАй бұрын
Glad you're here mate!
@gerttaeymans7 ай бұрын
I may be completely off-base here, but at 5:20 you state that the most important parts of the slide are panels 2 and 3. I think they are not. They are consequences of panel 1. As a result, panels 1 and 3 are important. I would even leave panel 2 to be an appendix slide. it makes this slide at 5:20 overly complex. The slide after it (at 6:20) will in my experience only generate questions and confusion in a board room. Your commentary does not immediately resonate with me as a senior corporate member. When I see such examples in a presentation, I will discard the content quickly as "consultant-speak" The next slide at 07:25 talks about disruption, and yet, as an exec, I just see an overall parallel evolution. No disruption... I think you have the right ideas, but the examples are, at least for me, not really resonating. I do like your "so what" principle, and to be specific and to have the slide action title supported by the body.
@DanGalletta7 ай бұрын
Appreciate the feedback, thanks for taking the time to write it out!
@gerttaeymans7 ай бұрын
@@DanGalletta I truly appreciate your response. Keep doing your stuff man!
@daveobrien57532 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed this, what are your opinions on the title being a general description with an action title in the subtitle?
@DanGalletta2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dave! Do you mean like the Oliver Wyman example? I think that structure is best used when the first line describes the chapter/section you’re in, then underneath you have the slide action title
@herrywijanto18217 ай бұрын
Nice and well explained the concept... thanks a lot!