The 5 Most Powerful Destroyers In The World Today

[@sweatybotfn9982]

The type 055 is technically a destroyer because dispute it’s water displacement of 10 000 tons, it is created and used for destroyer “type” operations

[@talentpt]

apparently this video puts Sejong the great class with 11000 tons displacement as destroyer. So that is not an issue

[@sweatybotfn9982]

@@talentpt exactly so it’s false

[@BHARATIYA_TIGER]

Kolkata Class even though is Stealth destroyer with multiple role but it's a Generation behind and Vishakapatnam Class is the one on the list.

[@frankfleming1103]

I don't think so ugly ship can bulid by human, tell me it is not real, I can't accept there is so ugly ship like Vishakapatanam and Kolkata exist on real world, any normal human above 3 years old can't design such ships

[@SUCHITCHOUDHURY]

@@frankfleming1103 Hmm..Glad ko know that you have 0 understanding of military vessels. THis is not a beauty pageant you simple minded jackfruit. Any one of this ships is more than sufficient to reduce a city to rubble. You can stick to your fishing boats.

[@tarrytao7508]

​@@frankfleming1103So you judge destroyers by their beauty.. are you a fool or what.. It's not ship for your personal tour.. so for convenience, next time they will do make up of the ship before sending it to war

[@Jordan-du6fu]

​@@frankfleming1103A Kolkata class came here to New Zealand not long ago and i think they look great.

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

@@frankfleming1103 You're below 3 years 😂😂😂

[@sanasshushu3905]

India's Vishakapatnam Class should be in the list, ig Kolkata class in much more for defence that that of aggressive warfare

[@sanasshushu3905]

@lazynow1 just like ur name why not stay lazy and do nothing for this world, it would be great help for all living forms 😃😃😃

[@sanasshushu3905]

@lazynow1 ahhhh wait u still doesn't use soap damm , how doesn't u know India had discovered it hundreds of year ago , bro u need to come out of cave

[@sanasshushu3905]

@lazynow1 aeeeeeooo ur english is weak bro I said they had discovered it 100 of years ago , it's just u who doesn't use it still now damm what a sad and blind life u have , but anyway when u grow up and have a job please buy urself and ur family a pack fo body wash don't worry it doesn't cost much 🥺🥺🥺

[@Shockwave001]

@lazynow1 did you do anything great after using soap ? and which country u are from ?

[@Shockwave001]

@lazynow1 u didnt answer which country u r from ? or is it shamfull?

[@rickgolder6818]

Ignore your life problems just like bee ignored Vishakapatnam class destroyers 👌

[@LearTrough]

Bee!

[@nitinagrahari1806]

Kolkata destroyer comes under vishakhapatnam class..

[@rickgolder6818]

@@nitinagrahari1806 no. Kolkata class is a totally different class of destroyers, Kolkata class destroyers are the successor of the delhi class destroyers, the name of the three Kolkata class destroyers are INS Kolkata, INS Chennai and INS Kochi. Whereas Vishakapatnam class destroyers are the latest Destroyers and the successor of Kolkata class destroyers. The three vishakapatnam class destroyers are INS Vishakapatnam, INS Mormugao and INS Imphal. The next gen destroyers that is the Project 18 (P-18) class destroyers will be the successor of Vishakapatnam class destroyers. It will be one of the biggest and heaviest destroyers after completing with a weight of around 12,000 tons. The first ship is supposed to be ready by 2027.

[@rickgolder6818]

@@nitinagrahari1806 no. Kolkata class is a totally different class of destroyers, Kolkata class destroyers are the successor of the delhi class destroyers, the name of the three Kolkata class destroyers are INS Kolkata, INS Chennai and INS Kochi. Whereas Vishakapatnam class destroyers are the latest Destroyers and the successor of Kolkata class destroyers. The three vishakapatnam class destroyers are INS Vishakapatnam, INS Mormugao and INS Imphal. The next gen destroyers that is the Project 18 (P-18) class destroyers will be the successor of Vishakapatnam class destroyers. It will be one of the biggest and heaviest destroyers after completing with a weight of around 12,000 tons. The first ship is supposed to be ready by 2027.

[@wangzhang9478]

W E A K

[@webdeveloper2432]

Please update the video. Didn't include Vishakapatnam class destroyer which is the most advanced destroyer from India. Kolkata class mentioned in the list is a decade old one but surprisingly it is doing much better than current ones in the world. Equipped with Brahmos, Vishakapatnam class destroyer's attack capabilities are far superior than the ones mentioned in the list. With Barak 8 defence, it is near impossible to get attacked by any missile.

[@ChandranPrema123]

Vishakapatanam is same as Kolkata but with better stealth,less crew and better radios . Improvements are very minor

[@webdeveloper2432]

@@ChandranPrema123 Weapons package is what makes a warship deadly. Weapons upgrade and stealth are not minor improvements in a battlefield.

[@nps7742]

​@@ChandranPrema123its not same, even the look is different

[@amuxpatch2798]

@@webdeveloper2432 The longer the ship and higher the hull ,easy target for anti ship missiles from land based missile systems and enemy ships with longer range missiles.

[@TianpengXian]

why Indian people always so confident😂

[@luoyanyang7625]

Without Type 055, this list is a BS.

[@工业党员]

055是战略舰 和这些打杂的驱逐舰没办法列入一个报表😂😂

[@amalielynmead]

055是驱逐舰，被划在巡洋舰范畴，不是什么战略舰，而且根本没有这个战略舰的说法。@@工业党员

[@junma00118]

因为055一上，美国就不是第一了，那这个视频就不正确了。

[@ricosu192]

他们把055放到巡洋舰。

[@indiano.1.]

​@@junma00118想多了，这个人的视频，美国永远第一，有055的视频里，他把猪母放第一的

[@productguru8323]

The radar system on Kolkata class is No doubt the most powerful one on the ocean in this world!

[@catstory1986]

where is china 055 destroyer? why put 052d here??

[@PRBananastan]

If they did, America won’t be on top 1 and that is an absolute crime

[@101airborn]

@@PRBananastanI totally agree with you!you are the fourth and fifth person in youtube that I find wise!👍

[@MrCedric123abc]

No credibility 055 has to be number 1.. hence why the new US destroyer is based on it .. US destroyer under development looks like a copy of the 055 😂😂😂

[@niweshlekhak9646]

But the Burke it the only destroyer that has done something.

[@911rsr]

Free Tibet

[@mickmick3364]

indeed

[@kevinwang4241]

Western media are still not used to the fact that many of China’s weapons are already the best in the world.😂😂😂

[@911rsr]

@@kevinwang4241 Only Chinese would think such a way. Free Tibet and fuck Xi bro

[@十毛]

If the Chinese 052d destroyer ranks the 3th, how about hhe 055D? It is much more advanced than 052d

[@张雷-t9x]

他们归巡洋舰里了

[@白杨M]

老外做的视频，第一绝壁是美国人的

[@WalterVelasquez-xp3fx]

Made in China is very poor quality 💩

[@sweatybotfn9982]

You’ve got to be kidding me, you put 052D class and didn’t put 055?

[@fanjiaqi2840]

放了055还有美国人什么事

[@sweatybotfn9982]

@@fanjiaqi2840 也都😛

[@djibicisse]

@@fanjiaqi2840nothing

[@mattbrown817]

I can't help but think our beloved Narrator is the only person I know who can make modern warships sound sexy.

[@Jps_8]

This list needs to be updated, Vaishakapatnam class destroyers have been inducted with over 2000 changes from kolkata class destroyers kolkata class destroyers are old now

[@stokeynathu8112]

Among the 5 Most Powerful Destroyers ，4 in Asia

[@kw8757]

According to this shit laughably amateurish video.

[@KaustubhBadgujarK2]

I don't no why people hate Indians ? If you hate India then comment below why you hate india, let's have fair discussion. Come with facts not conspiracy. 👍

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

its usually the Chinese, P@kis and Brits. Ignore.

[@IvyKuong-xe6cw]

Just a question how do u k of people hate Indians I can't see any comment against Indians so I am bit doubtful but you can prove me.

[@pelandolickasshole8715]

@@IvyKuong-xe6cw you have less notice that

[@amarjeetmutum809]

No hate just jealousy

[@Chickenworm9394]

Wr don't hate Indians. We take pity on Indian arrogance😂

[@tanagra2]

Another brilliant video thank you

[@lingth]

no Type 055 from China? its newer than the 052D

[@VINN_MW]

if there is a type 055 China. America will lose badly😂. and this channel admin doesn't want that

[@PRBananastan]

055 is just Chinese propaganda and does not exist, don’t worry about it 😂

[@djibicisse]

It’s a cruiser lol

[@pupuwang4826]

身為中國人，我強烈要求055應該跟影片中其他的驅逐艦分開，055裝備了10馬赫的高超音速導彈，影片中的其他船加起來都比不上055

[@apocain]

如果航母是把飞机场搬到海上，055其实就是把导弹发射井搬到了海上。。。

[@101airborn]

@@apocain 谁不是呢，我们台湾同胞的导弹打得了那么远么？你们的铺路抓雷达系统太弱，太容易被黑😄

[@zeuspark4408]

Now, the most powerful destroyer in Korea is not a Sejong The Great class destroyer but a recently built Jeongjo The Great class destroyer. Length : 170m (557.7 ft) , Displacement : 12,000 tons , Speed : 30 + knots

[@harikrishnanps8938]

Where type 55 destroyer

[@djibicisse]

Cruiser

[@吴晓-y5o]

居然有印度驱逐舰上榜，没搞错吧

[@landflame]

一个月前美印关系可能比较好吧，照顾一下印度万国造的面子

[@PRBananastan]

啥？驱逐舰？我还以为是一次性潜艇

[@LuckyAntenna-yr7fb]

I heard something about where the missiles are filled up with water are coming from your country right ?

[@cf5365]

The video would not be "politically correct" if it included a Chinese 055 destroyer.

[@Aamirmhmd99]

Where is the type 055 Renhai class destroyers? They weigh 13000 tonnes and pack 118 vls missiles making it one of the deadliest destroyers in the world.

[@chfa2001]

055被列為：巡洋艦

[@Nguyen1996-w1p]

​@@chfa2001錯, 為什麼韓國的也是超過一萬頓不算？

[@chfa2001]

@@Nguyen1996-w1p 韓國的只能叫防空驅逐艦，他的反艦飛彈還是用普通的斜角發射箱

[@Nguyen1996-w1p]

@@chfa2001 斜不斜角是他們的技術落後問題, 和分類是沒有關係

[@wingwong2064]

主要原因055 也加在列表內美國的就不能夠是第一名了，你們明白的！

[@richessery8475]

This list isn't even close.

[@Library890]

The US Navy and US Marine Corps should hire Filipinos to the US Military as Gen Mc Arthur did in the 40's, Many Filipinos joined US Army and US navy and US Marines

[@josephjun4688]

如果中国的055型驱逐舰、美国的朱姆沃尔特级驱逐舰都被算作巡洋舰，那这份榜单还能看。

[@musa7010]

Biggest fear of STG class is not another fighting vessel but the US Sanctions 😂

[@haopei1605]

where is the type 055

[@anuragrai6330]

Type 055 crying in corner with vishakapatnam and maya class.

[@PRBananastan]

Don’t put the 055 with those garbage, thanks

[@reighbh13]

where does the Royal Navy type 45 fit on the list?

[@olivergrundy5205]

Should be in 5th with Indian destroyer off the list

[@Aryan-xv5or]

No where 😂

[@pdss2528]

@@olivergrundy5205lol, the type45 is primarily an air defence destroyer and it lacks the offensive capabilities. The indian destroyers carry 16 brahmos anti ship missiles which are the fastest supersonic anti ship missile in the world. And it also carries 32 indo-isreali barak-8 sams so it perfectly fits on the list

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

Type 45 destroyers are designed for Air defence role, while Kolkata/ vishakhapattanam class destroyers are Multirole destroyers which can perform Air defence, Anti ship, Land attack, Anti submarine warfare roles.

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

at no.10, but unless upgraded in the near future, it could possibly be out of the top 10.

[@bharatbayash1146]

this channel pro US only support and highlights US weapons only😂😂

[@peach5403]

😂😂😂😂

[@PRBananastan]

No, that is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard of. America still has the best naval destroyer, the 055 is just propagation of the CCP and does not exist. This channel is fair and unbiased 😂

[@santiagobotero6278]

Type 055 number 1

[@Triggatra4258]

Ain't you from Mexico or something? Why would you go for China? They will take all your $ and land and then make it seem like they did YOU a favor amigo. Get it together.

[@shanshan2077]

Perhaps this channel calls it a cruiser, similar to how America classifies it

[@bermanmo6237]

​@shanshan2077 Due to its tonnage, more than the US Ticonderoga class cruisers, it is technically a cruiser.

[@baba-vh7hb]

where is 055

[@horridohobbies]

China's Type 055 13,000-ton destroyer isn't on your list??? China currently has 8 of these ships. The Type 055 is widely regarded as the most powerful warship on the planet.

[@EmarElutin]

Said the Chinese 😂😂😂😂

[@rjabongan1359]

@@EmarElutin but the chinese navy have lesser naval war experience than US

[@leeswecho]

The Type 055 isn't even the most powerful warship in the PLAN.

[@horridohobbies]

@@rjabongan1359 It doesn't matter. The Chinese navy is still deadly powerful.

[@djibicisse]

@@leeswechoit’s a cruiser

[@vickyyadav5723]

A messy list this list needs to get updated nd include Vishakapatnam class Destroyer which is latest....

[@wentao614]

Chinese 055?!

[@easahuang2057]

055被他们归为巡洋舰。。。

[@Chickenworm9394]

被三哥吃掉了

[@enzhus]

失踪大王当然是最好的，你刚想打它却发现它失踪了 😮

[@xinfuxia3809]

Destroyers have taken the roles of battleships.

[@ylstorage7085]

Great list to show us from which Counties people watch this Channel!

[@mohan02]

China should be no.1 as, I heard, their missiles are filled with water (cutting edge technology I guess) instead of fuel.

[@russelfang7434]

Basically these rumors were first made up by 4chan and then spread by the treasured Indians. They are addicted to these Internet crap.

[@user-tr1jh6wy5h]

真的有人信😅

[@LearTrough]

@@russelfang7434 Indians on 4chan? You smoking pot?

[@Telugumapper]

Were are indian vishekapatnam class destroyer they are stealth guided and far more advance then Kolkata class india have 4 of them

[@sanujitroy6830]

bharat on destroyer testing

[@emd-ef4lm]

SEJONG 駆逐艦はVLSミサイルが128基w

[@Nguyen1996-w1p]

Is a copycat version. Type 055 is far stronger with dual band radar.

[@짱구오빠-r6d]

Lol cute chinese 😂😂😂​@my33311

[@unkle.k]

@@Nguyen1996-w1p"Calling the Sejong-class destroyer a 'copycat' of the Type 055 is a bit like saying one smartphone brand copied another because they both have screens and cameras. The Sejong-class was launched in 2008, long before the Type 055 even hit the water in 2017. If anything, it seems like China might have taken some notes from South Korea's playbook.As for the dual-band radar, it's worth noting that technology isn't just about specs on paper-it's about real-world performance and integration into a broader defense strategy. The Sejong-class has proven itself over years of service, while the Type 055 is still relatively untested in real-world conditions.But sure, if it helps you sleep at night, you can keep telling yourself that bigger is always better. Just remember, when it comes to naval warfare, it's not just the ship-it's the skill and strategy behind it."

[@Nguyen1996-w1p]

@@unkle.k the new Sejong class Korea is planning to build. Look at the draft exactly the type 055. I am not talking about the old Sejong class copying from Alane Burke. The Chinese start building the type 055B more advanced ship with laser weapons, increasing from 13,000 tons up to 20,000 tons. The cells will be increased up to 144 from 116.

[@unkle.k]

​@@Nguyen1996-w1pIt's amusing that you’re questioning South Korea’s ability to innovate when China is notorious for its reliance on reverse engineering and industrial espionage. You know, using spies to steal technology and then copying it? Sure, South Korea might license and collaborate with American defense systems-because, unlike some countries, we believe in developing technology through legal and ethical means. It’s called respecting intellectual property, something China might want to consider learning.The difference is, South Korea doesn’t need to resort to underhanded tactics to advance its technology. We’ve built a reputation for quality and cutting-edge innovation that the world respects. So, if it comes down to paying for a license or simply stealing ideas and copying them, I think it’s clear which approach has more integrity and long-term success.

[@tiaoyi-bx5yi]

India pieced together a ship with parts from various countries.

[@bornfree735]

And you reverse engineered your entire country 😂

[@haguroIJN-myokoclass-No.4-1929]

「あたご」じゃなくてより新しい「まや」にしてほしかった

[@niweshlekhak9646]

Except Burke none of the other destroyers are battle tested.

[@reighbh13]

crew capability isnt listed on the wiki page 😂

[@juniorleslie4804]

The Arleigh Burke is battle tested against who?, Sadam Hussein, and the Tabilan Militia Navy. Are you serious, if they are the most powerful countries the USN fought against, I wouldn't call that battle tested. None of these destroyers are tested in any naval battles, such as the Battle of Midway, the Coral Sea, and the Leyte Gulf, or the Jutlands. Those are just a few of the great Naval battles, until these vessels face such challenges; I personally would hold off, on any claims that they are battle tested .

[@niweshlekhak9646]

@@juniorleslie4804 among the listed destroyers I mean, which other destroyer in that list has shot down anything. Well and yes, Iraq was the 5th strongest army in the world before US invaded.

[@juniorleslie4804]

@@niweshlekhak9646 The strongest or the 5th largest. Naval destroyers have land attack capability, but do they fight armies, or other navies. Threats to destroyers are other surface combatants, aircraft with anti-ship missiles, cruise and ballistic missiles, and submarines. Did either Iraq or Afghanistan possess any such military capabilities?.

[@niweshlekhak9646]

@@juniorleslie4804 Yeah Iraq did have a Navy.

[@Telugumapper]

Ins surat no 1

[@HenriHattar]

The Australian HOBART class is just a BIT better than the Aeirleigh Burke and just a small bit behind the UK version, which is the best in the world.

[@t.4999]

lol uk version is the best? Pulling sentences from the back end? It’s meant for only air defence and you selling that garbage as being better that ships that can multirole? 😂 Aussi ships are sitting ducks. What’s the news with that Canberra Class Amphibious Assault Ship (LHD)? Is it fit to float leat alone fight? Get over yourself. World doesn’t revolve around white nations 😂

[@tringuyen7519]

Unless Australia’s Hobart class comes with SEWIP block 3, Arleigh Burke is the king of destroyers. SEWIP 3 can repel hypersonic & ballistic missiles.

[@HenriHattar]

I take it you are a manufacturer??????@@tringuyen7519

[@nps7742]

Yah thats why they send it to Yemen....

[@dundonrl]

The Arleigh Burke design is 33 years old and they are still building them. I guarantee you that the newest Burke class DD the Flight III USS Jack H. Lucas DDG 125 is the most advanced and capable destroyer on the planet. (yes, including the Zumwalt class DDG).

[@fclovemimi]

为什么拿052C的照片说成052D？

[@HaiUieRana]

What about Zumwalt Class destroyer.

[@louischoi2883]

POV: Type 055 is classified as cruiser, so it’s not on the list.

[@人才-g2b]

WTF What we define here is a destroyer

[@halfmanhuang2029]

Hey, in your logic, nearly all destroyers in this list can be seen as cruiser.

[@MrCastodian]

That’s just dumb, Type 055 is a destroyer, just because USA say it’s a cruiser does not make it a cruiser, just as large ships in both USA, Japan and South Korea are called destroyers, but They call Type 055 a cruiser, a big lol

[@kuniakinakatsu7107]

Japan plans to start building Aegis warships starting this year. According to the revealed specifications, she has a total length of 190 meters and a displacement of 12,000 tons. Two ships are planned to be built.

[@rajatjangir674]

This video is not fair.😂😂 I'm an Indian happy to see my country in this list but hey where is Zumwalt class destroyer miss. 😂😂😂

[@rohitb5834]

Zumwalt class is a 16000 tons cruiser, and cannot be ranked along with 7500-12000 tons Destroyer.

[@phaddu7737]

Arguably is good word.

[@thenighttale-g8x]

when American DDGX finish, they will say chinese type 055 copied from DDGX. just like when they say wechat pay copied apple pay

[@gasparguadalupethecante6377]

great video greetings the buzz you are the best in the world

[@あああ-o8d]

Where did the Maya class go? And I am Japanese, so I am probably a bit biased, but I believe that even the Atago class, not the Maya class, is superior to the kolkata class. The Atago class has been recently upgraded to the same Aegis System Baseline 9 as the Maya class and is now equipped with an/spq-9b, and can also carry SM-6, although it is not currently scheduled to do so. The Kolkata class, on the other hand, can carry only 32 cells worth of missiles, the remaining 16 cells being for anti-ship missiles, and the range of the Barak-8 missiles is not flattering to begin with, and the Kolkata class is not a dedicated defense ship like the Aegis in terms of armament to begin with. I think the comparison itself is wrong.

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

all you are talking about is Air defence. Talk about the Radar - The MFSTAR is an AESA radar with a range of around 500 kms. AN/SPY 1 D(V) is a 400 kms PESA radar introduced in 1998. Anti ship/land capabilities - BrahMos can hit targets over 400 kms with speeds of Mach 3. Where does the Type 90 Anti ship missile stand in Comparision? 200 kms range and Mach 0.8? Anti sub warfare - Kolkata is equipped with Heavy torpedo tubes with torpedos have ranges of 40 kms. This is supplemented by ASW rockets for short range targets. Light Torpedo tubes on Atago can match that? Even in aviation capabilities, 2 Helicopters vs 1?

[@あああ-o8d]

@@ParaSF-im8kn Indeed, it's no surprise that the Atago class loses in anti-ship capability, because 　　　 Japan has long left anti-ship capability to aircraft, such as the f-2 and p-1. However, in terms of anti-ship capability, the helicopters carried by the Kolkata class are older than the Seahawk, and the U.S. only uses some of them anymore, and they are old aircraft that have been retired by Japan and Canada. Also, you said the Kolkata class has a radar range of 500km, but I checked and it only says 450km. I looked it up in English properly. Oh, and how many targets can the Kolkata class radar track at the same time? I haven't been able to find any. The range of the Kolkata-class missiles is not comparable to that of the sm-2 and sm-6, so their range advantage is not that significant. Well, if these factors are taken into account, the Kolkata class is probably more useful than Atago class. However, the Atago class wins hands down when it comes to anti-aircraft capability. The Atago class wins in ballistic missile defense capability, just because the Kolkata class is not equipped with it. Ah, but now that I think about it, the Atago-type SM-6 can also be used as an anti-ship missile, so it may have superior anti-ship capabilities.

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

@@あああ-o8d Helicopters are not part of the ship. They are part of the Naval Aviation and can be changed as per requirement on a ship. From 2023, the Indian Navy has started acquiring MH-60R, the upgraded version of what the Japanese Navy uses, SH-60K. In the coming days, they will be be flying from the frontline warships of the Indian Navy. Kolkata Class's radar range is shown as "over 450 kms". I have been on the INS Kolkata and the sailors have told me its "around 500 kms". Even for Atago's radar , its shown as 370 kms, but for this comment, i have calculated as 400 kms. Hundreds of targets are tracked. and AESA technology is much more superior than PESA. Its a generation ahead. I have agreed, Atago wins in Anti air as well as Ballistic missile defence. But Kolkata is much better in Anti-ship, Land attack, Anti sub warfare, radar and aviation facilities. Even the design of Kolkata is stealthier and more modern 2010s design. Atago is directly based of the older 1990s Arleigh Burke Class design. Also Kolkata Class has much more advanced network centric capabilities. Look up "Cooperative engagement capabilities" .

[@あああ-o8d]

@@ParaSF-im8kn Ah, so the Kolkata class wins. Well, I could agree that the Aegis system is the most powerful in the world, but the spy-1 is a passive radar, so it is inferior to the Kolkata class radar. Also, I didn't know that the SH-60R is operated by the Indian Army. By the way, the Maritime Self-Defense Force is procuring the SH-60l, a development of the SH-60k, starting in 2023. Well, we are all friends against China, so let's work hard for each other！

[@IvyKuong-xe6cw]

@@あああ-o8d Fr China is aggressive against all the south east Asian countries including mine, Malaysia.

[@leehale5828]

A powerful group of destroyers, however, naval traditions, crews, training and experience will always make the difference in battle. Being dedicated and willing to die for your country is not enough. Sometimes you just die. For further information please consult the Japanese, Italians, Germans and Russians.

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

Naval tradition wow you must have not heard about India's carrier ops in 1971 war and Indian Navy's fighting experience

[@tringuyen7519]

Naval tradition means nothing compared to technology. US has SEWIP block 3 on its destroyers which can repel hypersonic & ballistic missiles!

[@Teknik_Pemula]

just in theory...never fight each other/face to face directly...😅

[@아무무-z6l]

055 = made in china

[@tag10]

Type 45’s are the most advanced in the world

[@AtlascopcoChong]

055 is THE most superior destroyer/cruiser at sea, period.

[@unkle.k]

It's great that you take pride in the Type 055, but let's not ignore some important facts. China has a history of what many call "inflated specs" or "fake specs"-where things look impressive on paper but don’t necessarily hold up in real-world conditions. The Type 055 might boast advanced features, but let's not forget the numerous incidents at sea involving Chinese vessels due to technical failures or subpar quality control. These issues raise serious doubts about the reliability and effectiveness of the Type 055 in real combat situations. While the ship may look formidable, until it’s proven in real-world operations and under the stresses of combat, all those impressive stats are just that-numbers on a page. The Type 055 still has a lot to prove. So before we start claiming superiority, it might be wise to see if the Type 055 can actually perform as advertised. Until then, it’s just another unproven asset in the Chinese navy’s fleet.

[@AtlascopcoChong]

@@unkle.k really

[@unkle.k]

​​@@AtlascopcoChong I mean it dear.

[@AtlascopcoChong]

@@unkle.k keep on dreaming babe

[@unkle.k]

@@AtlascopcoChongO55 is the most superior destroyer/cruiser at sea, period. @AtlascopcoChong Keep on dreaming babe.

[@augustomaramonte9619]

Not including a royal navy a France o r Italian destroyer on the list are making me questioning but anyone can have their opinion

[@sinnopal1]

italians? italian military? i am laughing...they could not even beat machete carrying ethiopians...

[@augustomaramonte9619]

@@sinnopal1 not the navy but the ship baby The same thing that France have Questioning the Royal Navy ship too?

[@IamTheGundam]

They are just overestimated and expensive targets on the sea… time changed.

[@sinnopal1]

these are aegis destroyers...billion dollar ships. wake up, you are still in ww2

[@HowM771]

A little disappointing that the Royal Navys Type 45 isnt on here as i personally think theyre unmatched in radar and sensor capability, only lacking in numbers

[@t.4999]

You use the radar to track what? It’s an air defence ship primarily lacking any offensive capabilities.

[@HowM771]

@t.4999 Any offensive capabilities? The 4.5 inch, MOD 1 main gun, as well as their ability to carry Harpoons AND tomahawk cruise missiles? Ah yes, sounds like a lack in offensive capabilities... As for the radar, it also tracks ships and ground targets, so whilst you're right in saying it is an air defence Destroyer (AAW) It can, and probably would, be used for S2S combat

[@t.4999]

@@HowM771 scroll down the comment section and others have typed out clearly how “STRONG” the ship is based on its feature. I’m not going to repeat their points again…

[@t.4999]

@@HowM771 lol you clearly have no idea how naval warfare works. Even a Corvette has same gun.. so what? Grow up. There are hypersonic cruise missiles of 500kms+ range that can break a ship in half with just its memetic power and air defence missiles of 150kms+ rage… and you are talking of subsonic tomahawk and other short range missiles of the 80s-90s… seriously? It’s not 19-20th century to where British empire sailed supreme. Times have changed. Read the other comments below

[@HowM771]

@t.4999 Well, I suppose you're right, I've only been serving for 6 years. I've only been on all 6 destroyers, both our carriers, 2 frigates, 2 US Arleigh Burkes, and 4 OPVs, but sure, my experience means nothing, even though I've witnessed exercises go sideways. But hey, naval warfare at its finest, right? As for your corvette remark, I am yet to see a corvette, with a 4.5in main gun. As for the Royal Navy, from my experience, we are one of the most technologically advanced Navies on the planet. We just serverly lack numbers... Also. I stated that the tomahawk were used as an added offensive capability, and I'm well aware of what they are capable of... I would strongly suggest you remain hidden behind your keyboard before you land yourself in an argument you can't finish. Goodday

[@BrenSoleo]

Battleships! Make one with battleships

[@sinnopal1]

you are living in a world of pre-WW2 era....

[@shajil9962]

Ins Imphal is a class apart and the latest

[@malparidoscretinos]

And where are the russian ships with the hipersonic missiles?

[@kyzoaryant9905]

This destroyer will be destroyed if they meet frigate armed with zircon 😂😂

[@Gorilla1949]

Why is there no Indonesian TNI-AL ?? They said they are the strongest army in the world.

[@Korean_Air_HL8006]

Jeongjo Class is better than Sejong, and it could be number one....

[@unkle.k]

정조대왕함(FFX Batch-III)과 세종대왕함(DDG)을 비교할 때, 두 함정은 목적과 설계가 다르기 때문에 크기와 능력을 직접적으로 비교하는 것은 쉽지 않아요. 정조대왕함은 차세대 호위함으로, 세종대왕함보다 작지만 최신 기술이 적용되어 있어 다양한 임무를 수행할 수 있도록 설계되었어요. 반면, 세종대왕함은 강력한 대공 방어 능력과 대함, 대잠수함 능력을 갖춘 대형 구축함으로, 더 크고 중량이 나가며 다양한 임무에 투입될 수 있습니다. 어떤 면에서 보면, 정조대왕함은 세종대왕함보다 최신 기술을 갖추고 있어 더 효율적이고 첨단 무기를 탑재하고 있을 수 있지만, 크기나 화력, 전반적인 다목적성에서는 세종대왕함이 여전히 우위에 있을 수 있어요. 따라서, 기술적으로는 정조대왕함이 최신이라 'number one'이라고 할 수 있겠지만, 크기나 전반적인 전투 능력에서는 세종대왕함이 더 나은 측면이 있을 거예요. 결국, 어느 함정이 더 우수한지 판단하려면 어떤 임무와 상황에 사용될지를 고려해야 하겠죠.😊

[@craftycomputers4626]

Type 45 not being on this list is satire

[@mahamajones2994]

Thanks for the video but I do not agree with ur list at all

[@ayo-v1p]

Bruhhh, Sejong the Great destroyer is more powerful, more modern and more sophisticated than Arkwright Burke. I’m neither American nor South Korean but I’m a military analyst

[@shahab1947]

Where is HoutIran Yamantil 777 class HHH mark ??? 😅😅😅

[@LEEAUTOMOTIVE]

055 and the others😅

[@zahidhasan918]

😂😂😂😂 just funny list. You need to learn more about military ship. 1.type055 2.great class 3.maya class 4.horizon class 5.uss arber

[@bobsmith3983]

The Brahmos missile in not the fastest cruise missile in the world as the Zircon is the fastest.

[@LearTrough]

Well, unless you don't know how numbers work, your facts aren't true.

[@johnsilver9338]

In my opinion, in terms of VLS and capabilities Cruiser Ranking 1. SK's Sehjong Batch II : 128 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3 2. Chinese Type 055 : 112 VLS : dual band Type 346B radar, terminal supersonic YJ-18, anti-ship ballistic YJ-21 3. US Tico : 122 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST 4. SK's Sehjong Batch I : 128 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1 Destroyer Ranking 1. US Burke Flight III : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, dual band 37 array BMD SPY-6, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM 2. US Burke Flight IIA : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, dual band 24 array BMD SPY-6, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM 3. Japanese Maya : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST 4. US Burke Flight I/II : 90 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM 5. Japanese Atago : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, Tomahawk Block Va MST 6. Japanese Kongo : 90 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, Tomahawk Block Va MST 7. US Zumwalt Retrofit : 80 VLS : multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, 4 - 12 extra hypersonic CPS 8. UK Type 45 Retrofit : 72 VLS : dual array SAMPSON, S1850M/SMART-L, 8 extra NSM Frigate Ranking 1. Russian Admiral Gorshkov Batch II : 64 VLS : terminal supersonic 3M54T Kalibr, ramjet Oniks, scamjet Zircon 2. Spanish Álvaro de Bazán : 48 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, quad-packed ESSM, 8 extra NSM 3. Chinese Type 052D : 64 VLS : dual band Type 346A radar, terminal supersonic YJ-18 4. US Constellation : 32 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, 9 array BMD SPY-6, quad-packed ESSM, 16 extra NSM 5. Russian Admiral Gorshkov Batch I : 48 VLS : terminal supersonic 3M54T Kalibr, ramjet Oniks, scamjet Zircon 6. Australian Hobart : 48 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, quad-packed ESSM 7. UK Type 45 : 48 VLS : dual array SAMPSON, S1850M/SMART-L 8. Indian Visakhapatnam : 48 VLS : ramjet BrahMos 9. Indian Kolkata : 48 VLS : ramjet BrahMos

[@bkjworld]

Kolkata class and Visakhapatnam class is not frighets

[@johnsilver9338]

@@bkjworld They have less VLS and tonnage than other destroyers so i consider them as frigates. Same for Chinese Type 052D.

[@bkjworld]

@@johnsilver9338 but displacement?

[@johnsilver9338]

@@bkjworld Yes, tonnage or displacement, same thing.

[@bkjworld]

@@johnsilver9338 and Armament?

[@jjsmith4829]

please get a better narrator

[@teddygary6702]

055？？？

[@LODgram]

Stupid ranking. Where is Project 22350 with the world's deadliest hypersonic zircon? Project 22350 is the best, no doubt.

[@LearTrough]

Has it even completed yet?

[@fabricemartin5561]

Where si the chinese type 055 destroyer ? He had the yj-21 ballistic anti ship missile 1500-2000kms range mach 6-10, the yj-18 anti ship missile 540kms range mach 3 final hit, the hq-26 anti ballistic misdile, the hq-9b and hq-16fe anti cruise missiles, drones and a airplane, hq-26 anti ballistic and satellites missilles, cj-10 cruise missile surface to land, yu-8 missile anti submarine, to helo z-8, cwis 1130 and hhq-10 short range defense, 4 giant aesa radar s and c band, 50% more power electricity than burque and ticonderoga, 4 aesa radar band x for targeting and other stuff for the 8 first ship they build. Those type 055 are better than all of your short list actualy

[@rakeshkrishnan1099]

You need to replace kolkata with vishakapatnam class

[@mdshihab8219]

He sneaked in an indian destroyer like we wouldn’t notice

[@jagosingh85]

Where’s the all powerful Moskva?

[@Kimbo1972]

I'd suggest taking a look at the Royal Australian Navy's Hobart class Destroyer, which although based on a Spanish design, has US Aegis Command and Control system - and put that in front of the Indian vessels - matter of fact I'd put the Japanese vessels in front of the Indian one too - no offence to our Indian friends intended

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

No offence......let's compare😊 #Hobart class V/S #Kolkata class #Design Kolkata:- stealth Hobart:- non-stealth #Role Kolkata:- Multirole Hobart:- Air defence (primary) #SPEED Kolkata 30 knots Hobart 28 knots #Range Kolkata 11000 km Hobart 9300 km #Radar/ Range. Kolkata:- MF STAR (AESA) 450km Hobart:- AN/SPY1 (PESA) 370km #ARMAMENTS Kolkata 48 VLS sells Hobart 48 VLS sells #ANTI-SHIP MISSILE *Kolkata*:-16 units × #BRAHMOS speed Mach 3 / 2301mph Range 500km to 800km *Hobart*:- 8 units × #Harpoon Speed mach 0.71/ 537mph Range 220km #AIR-DEFENCE MISSILE Kolkata:- 32 units × BARAK 8 (ABM- capable) 150km range Hobart:- RIM 162 ESSM Range 50km RIM 66/ SM2 Range 150km #TORPEDO Kolkata:- Varunastra/ 533 mm Range 40km Hobart:- Eurotorp MU90/ 323 mm Range 23km #CIWS Kolkata:- 4 units × AK630M Hobart:- 1 unit × phalanx #HELICOPTER Kolkata 2 units Hobart 1 unit. #PRICE Kolkata $780 million/unit Hobart $3 Billion/ unit.

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

New Vishakhapattanam class destroyers are upgraded variant of Kolkata class, It's more powerful than it's predecessor armed with weapons like Brahmos ER, Barak 8 LR/ER, MF STAR AESA RADAR, has powerful network centric sensors and electronic warfare capability better than Aegis combat system.

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

others have already said it. Kolkata Class with its 450 kms+ AESA radar, 400 kms+ BrahMos Anti ship/land missile with speeds 3 times of sound, and other advanced network centric capabilities, is at a completely different level.

[@marcd5196]

I'd suggest, next time partner with India for your ships, rather than Spain or Uk. Unless u want overpriced, less capable 30 year old technologies. The Spanish clone you use uses the American AEGIS system which was initially introduced in the 1990s. Even US is upgrading the radar and other systems in the Arleigh Burke Block 3 version. And you bought that for 3 Bil$ for a ship that was commissioned in 2017.

[@BHARATIYA_TIGER]

​@@TheGreatMarathaArmyDon't worry brother I don't think he knows about destroyers that much anyway

[@markc6140]

Rubbish update. Many better destroyers with more firepower are missing . Arleigh Burke class too outdated.

[@PRBananastan]

It’s a top tier because it’s American

[@knottytoob]

There are no CCP bots in the comments section. Well done. Ha ha

[@崔佳-q5e]

055❤🎉

[@megaharlequin3990]

The photograph at 4:38 should be a Luyang II (Type052C) vessel, PLANS Haikou (DDG-171), according to her huge radar protection cover

[@successman7777]

Korea is win.

[@gordonmckenzie926]

No British Daring class?

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

Type 55 ???

[@БекболатСидагалиев]

055? 045?

[@summerroll7832]

Have you guys been living under a rock? The Type 055 not on the list??? Much much better research required. This video has no creditability :(

[@MaxKrumholz]

Saar 6

[@bermanmo6237]

Due to its tonnage, Saar 6 is classified as a corvette, just like MEKO K130 corvette which it is based on.. I do agree it is well armed just like the ships presented on this podcast.

[@nelsonsim]

Very biased. In many other comparisons, on KZbin, the Chinese Type 55 is considered the No. 1 most powerful destroyer in the world today. You can do better than this "The Buzz" or are you trying to "pull the wool over our eyes? Lol.

[@Melikegames3100]

As an Indian, l don't agree that the Kolkata Class destroyer should be in your list. These destroyer are defence destroyer to protect our terrietorial waters and thus have less firepower(with only 48 VLS cells and most of them are occupied with air to air missile). Also it a generation lower than the other destroyer mentioned in your video.

[@rahulbairik9534]

Well MF star radar is no shit with the power of supersonic cruise missiles that have high accuracy of pin point targets, it could easily take out any warship. And about battle tested none here in the list ever saw naval fight in history. One contributed to land based attacks or anti piracy operations.

[@Anurag_marne]

Get lost you are not Indian. You are probably Russian or European. Swear to god

[@Warship_Warriors]

@@rahulbairik9534 but bro radars are not everything. I agree that MF star is one of the most powerful ship-based radars, but Kolkata and Vishakhapatnam classes lack offensive and layered defensive capabilities. It is just not right to have only 48 VLS cells on a 7500-ton destroyer. there should have been at least around 60 VLS cells. it also needs more advanced CIWS and an increased number of antiair missiles.

[@aashishsingh6295]

​@@Warship_Warriors It is 48 because of brahmos missiles. They are heavy so acquire more space but also give greater kill probability than other cruise missiles. And you only need one to kill if it is effective. And India has no need to venture far from its territory, so there is no need for higher vls.

[@musa7010]

According to us indiots the Visakhapatnam class is the deadest 😡