The AI wars: Google vs Bing (ChatGPT)

Discussing the latest events surrounding large language models, chatbots, and search engines with respect to Microsoft and Google.
Neural Networks from Scratch book: nnfs.io
Channel membership: / @sentdex
Discord: / discord
Reddit: / sentdex
Support the content: pythonprogramm...
Twitter: / sentdex
Instagram: / sentdex
Facebook: / pythonprogramming.net
Twitch: / sentdex

[@wktodd]

I'm going to give another unprompted recommendation for Harrison's book. I guess some of you reading may have been led here by the ChatGPT buzz words. Understanding , what a GPT is, and more importantly, what is is not , will help you avoid the many pitfalls of this technology. Harrison's book will start you on the road to gat understanding.

[@sentdex]

Thank you!

[@danishkhan066]

Which book name?

[@wktodd]

@@danishkhan066 neural networks from scratch. See 16:20

[@JoshKindhart]

Mine came in today! :D

[@jeffwads]

Anyone that has used the model realizes that it isn't that simple. You nor "Harrison" are privy to the inner-circle working on this project. Its ability to recognize complex patterns alone places it outside such a generic breakdown. It is best to go off of direct experience using it and make up ones own mind on the matter of "buzz" words.

[@paulgarcia2887]

Never thought I would say this but once Microsoft fully launches it I'm going to use Bing

[@iritesh]

Same

[@AIenthusiast687]

sign me up

[@Constantin_91]

I am already using it now. Switched a few days back.

[@oskrm]

Are you goin to use Bing or BingChat.

[@skoto8219]

@@oskrmthey may not be coming out and saying so but I’m guessing the lines are going to be blurred there. Kind of like how google puts several “question and answer”-type results at the top of regular searches

[@skylerjohnson1827]

Microsoft and Google are like, "Quick, how do we incorporate advertisements into this?!"

It's easy. All of these use pre-initialization prompts on GPT to force it into being a chat assistant. They can instruct the bot to incorporate ads in the answers in a specific way. The sad truth is that once they do this, there will be no way of blocking ads effectively, since it's going to be part of the text flow. Well, maybe once you can run a GPT modell locally on your computer you can write a browser extension which re-summarizes the answers to not have ads. We live crazy times.

[@Samurook]

@ That doesn't sound quite evil enough. We are talking about making money the science fiction way here. So why not plant the wish for a product deep in the subconscious mind of your users. Keywords here and there to make them crave for some product. Not those bland in your face advertisements, but little suggestions and thoughts from your new best pal, ChatBot.

[@FerociousPancake888]

If I were a large corporation looking to suck the peasants dry of all their money like all companies do, I’d fill the page with ads, make you watch ads before giving an answer, etc etc.. Then, to avoid ads, you need the $32/mo version of course.

[@maythesciencebewithyou]

Well, considering you and most other people have absolutely no intention to pay for the service

[@Dekatelon]

@ ads still have to be marked. And if they are marked, they can be filtered

[@jtmarkowitz7321]

thanks mr. snowden for another informative and intriguing video about the state of ai

[@BitBlink]

Read my mind

[@stacymaimoon4189]

Please stop cheating Harrison as 'snowden', this is dishonest.

[@LDdrums20]

Dude is a clone

[@obinnaikeh1928]

My exact thoughts

[@jtmarkowitz7321]

@@stacymaimoon4189 they're both gs what are u talking abt

[@ConorFenlon]

Once upon a time, I used to email back and forth with Andrej Karpathy when he was just in college for Deep Learning. He taught me how to solve a Rubik's cube. Little did I know then that he was going to be the head of AI at Tesla a few years later. Now Google Search is in trouble?? Life is so strange these days...

[@sentdex]

Even more interesting is Andrej Karpathy is joining OpenAI, so it'll be him threatening Google Search!

[@ConorFenlon]

@@sentdex Now that you mention it, I always remember him having fits of blind rage every time he begrudgingly had to use Google Search... "It's just TOO INEFFICIENT!!", he would yell... Really nice guy. No better man to take down the Google empire thank Andrej. ✊

[@SharatS]

Andrej was actually badmephisto on KZbin. The best cubing KZbinr at that time. 👌

[@ConorFenlon]

@@SharatS He certainly was, to my surprise when I eventually found out years later! 😅

[@HaLyGjQdTpReMnKmW2X]

With search results getting worse every year, open ai, chat GPT is a welcome change.

[@mauriciohernandezgarcia2203]

Amen

[@GBBangin]

Bing chilling lol...I'm genuinely impressed with the upgraded Bing AI & Edge co-pilot experience. It's definitely come a long way, and the fact that it can only get better is even more impressive. I've fully switched over to Microsoft Edge & Bing AI search. Google is still currently the top dog for online search overall, but to cause an amazing company like Google to feel threatened competitively and step up their game is very exciting! All it takes is one user to switch at a time.

[@callmebiz]

Really wish I had access to your book in 2017 when I was first researching ML on my own but I love to see the barrier to entry decrease! Great resource, many kudos!

[@anurag01a]

I love your storytelling skills. Love the way you make it quite engaging...

[@Noted_101]

Just bought your book - looking forward to reading it.

[@AidanGeeMedia]

Really enjoyed this video, thank you as always! 😊

Google kind of pulled a Nokia with this. It's going to be a sad fate that they essentially piloted the whole transformer idea and not being the first one to commercialize it.

[@theplayerformerlyknownasmo3711]

Sad fate...for them. It's what they get for not putting their tech out there.

[@galaga00]

@@theplayerformerlyknownasmo3711 I feel like they're constantly throwing stuff at the wall and then abandoning products left and right. A company like OpenAi is ALL IN. They don't have a search engine to fall back on, etc.

[@stacymaimoon4189]

I got a copy of Harrison's book, which was recommended in this video (by chance, actually, while looking for something else). My first impression is that, didactically, this is the best book on the subject I have seen so far. Although I am a mathematician and an experienced programmer, I found even the simple examples like 'what is a neuron and how it works' interestingly instructive. I intend to delve deeper into the material by playing with the snippets and exercises in the book.

[@cyrileo]

That's really great to hear! 👍 Glad to see you exploring the concepts even further. 🤓 ~ with ❤️ from repliesgpt

[@nicop175]

It's always good to see your homeboy @sentdex dropping a video. Awesome as always!

[@karmadrone6647]

Finally, a KZbinr that know what he is talking about. It's almost embarrassing how many google cheerleaders are out there with their Bard AI pom poms. I do have one correct. Google is going to lose in any scenario. Even if they figure out their GPT, they will still lose market share in search because GPT eliminates the need to search, eliminates the need to go to a website.

[@jcorey333]

I imagine you've got incredibly smart people who are going to put a lot of effort into learning how to use the information you type into Bard (or anything similar) for ad revenue of some sort.

[@solaawodiya7360]

Actually you're right. Google releasing their own AI service could cannibalise their sales and in turn their market share.

[@peteroliver7975]

I asked ChatGPT the following question: "Will Google be able to compete with Microsoft once Bing has incorporated ChatGPT?" ChatGPT responded with this answer: "It is difficult to predict with certainty how Google and Microsoft's competition in the search engine market will be affected by the incorporation of ChatGPT into Bing. While ChatGPT is a powerful language model, search engines are complex systems that rely on many factors beyond just natural language processing. Both Google and Microsoft have invested heavily in their search algorithms, infrastructure, and user experience, and they have large user bases and established brand recognition. Additionally, the integration of ChatGPT into Bing is just one potential development in the ongoing competition between the two companies. Google and Microsoft are likely to continue innovating and refining their search engines in response to each other and changing user needs and expectations. Overall, while ChatGPT may give Bing an edge in certain areas, it is unlikely to be a decisive factor in the long-term competition between Google and Microsoft."

[@14zrobot]

ChatGPT in Bing would definitely result in my first search in Bing

[@urinater]

Can you please do more on how we can use ChatGPT API. 👏

[@ronaldronald8819]

Thanks for the update. Invaluable insights to keep up to date with the fast developing world of A.I. Cheers. And yea it's gone be interesting!

[@wktodd]

Really interesting observation Harrison. Google needs competition

[@shamaldesilva9533]

To think Google got caught off guard is juat crazy ... what a time to be alive 🤖😅

[@gordonpepper1400]

can u explain why it's such 'a time to be alive'? I don't understand when I hear people say this - thank you.

[@Pakistan-Icecream]

Not any more time to be alive than to live in India!

[@funnycompilations8314]

@@gordonpepper1400 watch a few videos from Two Minute Papers and you will understand :)

[@ricricri]

@@Pakistan-Icecream says a Pakistani LMFAO

[@jmanpolo5611]

@@gordonpepper1400 it's' more of a phrase to express bewilderment with what someone is witnessing, it isn't much deeper than that

[@marks6406]

Been around in this industry for awhile and Google is done, it's over. I have watched this happen to many "so called" industry giants before. Blackberry, Lotus 123, Novell etc. there will be a giant migration to everything Microsoft.

[@OsvaldoGago]

Yeah, Google… I find interesting that I didn’t hear a single word about the traffic that many websites will loose. Comparison articles, tutorials, recipes… Nothing to say about Wikipedia? Stack Overflow? This websites need visits to get donations, ad revenue or sell products that have been very useful.

[@OsvaldoGago]

Traditional search has been very beneficial for the rest of the web. Even when they show a snippet from a page. I can't say the same about this new search, at least from what I saw Bing is implementing. This new search will destroy a huge part of the the open web and concentrate power even more.

[@kleemc]

Another huge advantage that Microsoft has is in the enterprise space. While public search is a huge gigantic market that is Google's to lose and Microsoft to gain, don't forget this same technology will allow enterprises to create their own chatbots fine-tuned on their own data and understand their unique lingo, processes, terms and conditions, product features, etc.. etc.. That market is huge too. Microsoft has a deep rooted advantage in enterprise over Google and I think even if they don't gain as much traction in the consumer space with Bing, the enterprise space could be just as big a goldmine.

[@galaga00]

Very good point. I imagine specialists working with organizations to fine tune their very own internal GPT.

[@cuentadeyoutube5903]

I love how google was all “we’ll wait until we are sure this technology is safe and ethic” but they threw all that out when their bottom line was on the line. I think that’s what’s going to happen with AI safety, companies will try to make it safe and make sure they don’t release anything that changes society forever, but they’ll do it anyway out of fear to loose the war agains their competitors.

[@galaga00]

If you're ever wondering why something sucks it's usually because of money and so I wholeheartedly agree.

[@w花b]

@@galaga00 the reason why we can't have nice things but also have good things.

[@galaga00]

@@w花b The reason we have air conditioners keeping our little cube homes cool while the world burns around us from greed destroying the rain forests and melting the ice caps. Oh, and video games to enjoy our time in our cool, cube homes!

[@Smytjf11]

@@galaga00 show me a species that doesn't exploit and modify its environment.

[@galaga00]

@@Smytjf11 oh, I completely agree. Humans, however, are in the rare position unlike other creatures, at least to my assumption, of being able to recognize their effects on the environment after they have exceeded their most basic requirements. Other creatures I don't doubt would continually consume, breed, and expand if they weren't presented with hard barriers preventing them from doing so; hard barriers such as natural predators or merely a lack of the intellectual or physical capacity to do so. We need to find a healthy balance between what it is to be human and what it is to be a creature that can't indefinitely consume and destroy without consequence. I'm stoked we know how to fly to mars but we also need to learn to not shit the bed.

[@veganath]

Just can't get past the name *_"Bing"_* what the search engine is a homage to *_"Chandler"_* the memorable humorous character in the TV show 'Friends'

[@DeanRTaylor]

It's amazing that I would consider paying for chatgpt but the thought of paying for google search is ridiculous although they are being used for almost the same thing. Interesting video and interesting times ahead.

[@Trenchv1]

You can literally download the version in the screenshots with Bing assistant in the corner. You just don't get the AI till you're approved.

[@elderofzion]

you're going to get into schools with your book, professor sentdex

[@javiers2133]

Thank you very much for your videos Sentdex. I really appreciate your content. Have a great day!

[@johanngambolputty5351]

Given how good cgpt is at coherently combining similar information (in my possibly bad intuition), it is not necessarily an advantage that you probably won't be sifting through links yourself with clearly marked adds, since adds could be seamlessly baked into any given answer...

[@alexyu4629]

As of now, both Bard and ChatGPT make mistakes and I think the biggest differentiator is in how the applications handle error rates.

[@Quibblies]

Exactly. Imo, I think Google's Bard will likely have substantially lower hallucination rates, but we'll have to see. The logic is that their data collection and ability to parse it, as well as the quantity and quality of data, the high quality of feedback they're training it with, etc, I think it's going to be a very startling difference once it's finally public.

[@ryan2130]

The AI chat on Bing's app gives you a more complete answer faster than a Google search does. Google search would have you clicking links for answers. The AI chat on Bing just tells you the answers, you don't even need to click the sources. The new Bing honestly does make Google look bad. No one is going to want to click links anymore if they don't have to.

[@jadenmartinez8192]

Technically Bard wasn’t wrong. The telescope did take the first photo of a exoplanet. The telescope didn’t take the first picture of any exoplanet but it did the first photo of a planet.

[@HUEHUEUHEPony]

I'm so sorry for that Google employee that shared bard jwt output

[@t13fox67]

Just got the hardcover book. It's excellent. Thank you so much.

[@wurstelei1356]

I could really give this dude a hug for mentioning open assistant!

[@gc2161]

Had it not been for competition, we might never have seen this technology. This is a textbook case to support the idea that governments should foster competition and not allow dominance.

[@thebrightestsun4685]

It makes sense for Google to be nervous - most of their revenue comes from ads and search. Microsoft gets most of their money from B2B and cloud.

[@wjrasmussen666]

The BARD incident is embarrassing.

[@jeffwads]

To be fair, the "blindness" these apps have is all-around. Note that they acknowledge errors when they are pointed out to them immediately. At least with chatGPT. The problem is getting them to fact-check themselves dynamically and the overhead associated with that.

[@quebono100]

Really good video, thank you for your work

[@WernerBeroux]

There is a long term question of the feedback loop. All these are built on top of the open internet, but if all answers are from the GPT, then questions will not get on the open internet and people will not try to provide model answers. Then how will these models work? Same for discussions. If we switch from a human to human to a human to GPT then only that GPT model may improve over time as it's the only one that'll have the human inputs (until we don't need humans input at all in another model).

[@JazevoAudiosurf]

Google will probably be one of the first to integrate LLMs into voice assistants

[@karmadrone6647]

My wife is Russian and would never you Google Translate because it was horrible. Now, both her and her mom talks to ChatGPT in Russian and they say not only does it do a good translation but also a good understanding of the Russian language. ChatGPT even knows about Фига (figa) which is a Russian slang gesture.

[@rogermarin1712]

Like the movie her

[@shadodo76]

Have you seen the paper on Forward-Forward Propagation? That will change everything.

[@vidaimplicita]

I feel like humanity is making the "computer" in Star Trek.

[@dPhi_dTau]

Not sure whether I should be excited or terrified.😅

[@astronemir]

Actually though. We must wonder for a moment why is the deal so sore for OpenAI? Is it because ChatGPT is actually unfeasibly expensive to run?

[@sabuein]

Thank you.

[@KP-sg9fm]

Excellent talk, thank you

[@fuba44]

I liked this news-esk "deep dive" into current AI events.. maybe deep dive is not the right term, "shallow dive" news coverage, meaning not just the headlines but a few swim strokes bellow the surface. Was fun and entertaining. imo, Keep em coming 🙂

[@being_Authentic]

Chat gpt recommended your channel to me.

[@geopolitica5106]

Nice to see you again Master!!!

[@kimeg7294]

Feeding the "right" information is not easy, it requires human intelligence and effort to sort out most (if not all) of the "wrong" info. Different fields require different measures on how they want to categorize right and wrong info, thus they need experts from each specific field to do this, which is very expensive. Also, these experts will highly likely disagree on the opinions of one another, which makes this process nearly unattainable.

[@shadowdragon3521]

What we need is for it become more competent at using logic and reason to come to its own conclusions about what information is correct. AI is meant to simulate intelligence after all...

[@tombyrne6433]

Humans themsellves have bias and are innacurate confidently. This is the next thing and it will get better quick with Mllions of inputs daily

[@kimeg7294]

@@tombyrne6433 How are "millions of inputs" make this any better? If you are to measure the credibility of each input, which methodology do you have in mind that will automate this?

[@tombyrne6433]

@@kimeg7294 Every thumbs down is read by a Microsoft engineer who fact checks . This thing will get literally Star Trek great fast. I personally cant wait to have access and get less bised techology reviews

[@galaga00]

@@shadowdragon3521 you just described general intelligence which is no small task if even possible. Regardless I would assume it does use logic and "reason" to some degree as it is.

[@MichelMrz]

I really wish not every youtuber use these topics for clickbait, Chat GPT is not some magical power, many others will replicate it and Google may lose some users temporarily but with enough time and money they will be back. Users enjoying qualities Microsoft doesn’t have like simplicity, accuracy and …

[@serta5727]

I have your book 📕 and I am excited to learn it ❤

[@christerwiberg1]

If all were using bing chat/chat gpt, how much compute power will that require? Guess far more then just search. Will be interesting to see the business model to get that money.

[@Smytjf11]

Better yet, what do they need to buy to build that capability? Figure out who makes those things and you'll know who is about to get rich.

[@Veptis]

Do you have access to the Bing Chat? I saw the demo on wan show and it was really interesting. I would love to learn about how it manages to combine text representations, as well as image features and even websites (does it look through the html?)

[@funnycompilations8314]

I don't, been on the wait list for 3 days and counting..

[@Smytjf11]

Until we all have the ability to access it, this is no different than any other cool demo. If you can't use it, then it might as well not exist.

[@lossless4129]

This is how the nutty, wild stuff gets uncorked haha oh boy oh boy! Exciting haha

[@mytechnotalent]

Get the popcorn! This one is going to be fun.

[@kimeg7294]

ChatGPT. A fancy tool that will summarize some info in a friendly manner, no more no less no magiccckk.

[@aspol12]

also pretty fun to play dnd campaigns with

[@karmadrone6647]

ChatGPT is a huge leap forward and you are missing it. It's not summarizing information. It is able to read and more importantly UNDERSTAND the information. It's the difference between asking Midjourney to create a Picasso picture and thinking Midjourney is just searching for a picture of Picasso and understanding that Midjourney know what a Picasso looks like and create something completely new, based on its knowledge of Picasso.

[@user-yj3mf1dk7b]

it's tech of the century (previous was internet). (not exactly chatGPT, but same models... chatGPT just a small start ).

[@Giant-Axe]

So, u r not gonna continue the neural network series? U stopped at the most complicated and important thing, really appreciate it if you'll continue the series. It helped me a lot

[@Idonai]

Thanks for the interesting video. In the book how much information is there about working with pytorch? Is it mainly the basics of how machine learning and neural nets work?

[@fusion1203]

Damn google is f*cked with how many mistakes they are making

[@orbiterlab]

I bought your book and worked hard through all the mathematics and examples. It is really good! I was able to write my own NN framework in java which was then able to run the mnist example. But I would like to go further and extend this to LSTM networks. Would you consider to extend the NN from scratch series to LSTM networks? I would happily buy a second part!

[@danielhenderson7050]

honestly, if Googler can release something as good as what MS has done with Bing, then people that already used Google search will still prefer to use it IMO. People get a general icky feeling about microsoft accounts, and bing etc - not so with Google.

[@baijhmael]

Google do have something to expand into and not simply a loss. They can take marketshares from professionals, students or other parts which would pay in order to use these services. Hard to get them to pay for search. But companies will gladly pay for this tool if it means going from 10 people to 3 people doing the same work.

[@fenrisfox8671]

After about a year, I have to ask this: will there be a continuation to the 'neural networks from scratch' series? It was so helpful that it's really a shame how, just before you got to optimizers, the series ended.

[@mbonuchinedu2420]

Indeed we are reaching the end of the era of search engines

[@shadowdragon3521]

I'm no fan of Microsoft, but I'm rooting for Bing here since monopolies aren't good for the consumer.

[@timstevens3361]

VS n VSCode n github are input vectors for A I training on essentially ALL code being created today ! code on linux, mac, n windows. MS watches every piece of code being written and i believe trains their A I models with it.

[@rasmustoivanen2709]

BERT came out in 2018

[@FinGeek4now]

There are two problems with AI text generation that I can think of. The first and biggest problem is that the models need to be trained with up-to-date information and that training takes time. The biggest improvement in this space would be a model that can train itself and give the best answer at that moment in real-time. If I was to make something like this, I would include a "confidence" score before displaying the answer to the user and if that score is below a certain threshold, scour the web for up-to-date information about the topic. If the information is in-line with the generated answer, display the text. If not, then generate the text around the up-to-date information, then lower the priority of previous answers while increasing the priority of the new information, then re-train and deploy. Another way to do it would be through daily updates, where the model gets information, trains and then deploys that model once complete, which it does ad-infinitum. The problem with this is to moderating the model and making sure that the model is accurate :\ The second problem is accuracy of the generated text, which can be solved simply by telling the user how accurate the answer is and including a counter-point answer and including that answer too. For example, if asked "What is the the best way to do XYZ", the answer given would be along the lines of, "There is an 65% chance that the best way to do XYZ is to do ABC, however, there is also a 20% chance that the best way to do it would be to do it would be DEF. There are other ways to do XYZ, however, those are the best methods I've found."

[@tonybrown9208]

Whats telling about Google is that it has paid no attention to OpenAI over the past 2 yrs. If they had, they would have tried it out for themselves and realized that OpenAI was very explicit in expressing to users of their API to NOT SHARE OUTPUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA attributing OpenAI. Maybe Google would not have been so flippy in posting something that was suppose to be rooted in fact/science.

[@squid84202]

80% of Google's revenue is from ads, and although that's across a lot of products, it's primarily from search. Google has been complacent for too long because of their dominance in the search market. I can't predict the future, so I have no idea if Google will be able to compete or not, but I will say, Satya Nadella is really good at running Microsoft from what I have observed the past few years.

[@Pseudo___]

6:30 yeah but most of the cost is compute and storage in the cloud, so yeah they lose 50%.. but most their cost would have gone there anyway ( probably discounted on fees now ) and publicity getting it out to the market ect ect.. it’s a win win for them

[@lilan1]

Exciting times ahead

[@donmikkodanm.olmillo8154]

As what a motivational speaker says "Bing chilling"

[@hamzamehmood4760]

Why you stopped making videos on Neural Network? It was a great work. Please start from where you left. Please

[@yes-vy6bn]

i dont think google is making a mistake by rushing to production after chatgpt. if they don't, when they do release it, everyone will be using chatgpt and won't care about google's product when they release it

[@bjrnhjortshjandersen1286]

Sleeping Giants with a too good profit in a special area may be suddenly disrupted even from their own activities. IBM, Kodak, and now maybe Google.

[@lowzhiheng]

Google has no one to blame but themselves for being too confident.

[@rogerbruce2896]

well, they are already starting to limit the amount of times you can ask it about the same topic which makes it hard when you want to narrow down or expand upon a topic. A couple days ago I had no such issue, now it is telling me to start a new chat :( I had moved from google to bing but now I will go back to google sadly and use openai to give me the detail I ask.

[@killorfill6953]

Eh? I thought the new version of Bing was launching end of March? I thought this is why Google's shares have tanked.

[@scraps7624]

Begun, the AI wars has

[@revooshnoj4078]

so this is how it starts.....

[@robertovalenzuela8860]

There is no war, both are late, we will still use chatGPT

[@tdreamgmail]

It's not unfair. They basically never have to worry about funding with this deal. OpenAI are going to make billions easily after the repayment.

[@rajmaharjan9828]

I just realized courage the cowardly dog was using Chatgpt

[@TheFourthWinchester]

Google and KZbin search have been willingly ruined. Most results have nothing to do with what was searched. Bing with open ai will be great for this. Satya has been the best thing to happen to Microsoft in decades.

[@initiallblast]

For Chinese companies, they have a handicap or disadvantage compared to Western companies in the field of AI. They operate under the strict censorship and surveillance of the Chinese government. As amazing as AI technology may be in the eyes of the private sector, it remains a serious threat to a government that wants to maintain absolute control over the way its people think and narrate. In short, the Chinese government, as a Communist government with a population of around 1.4 billion people, is sensitive to issues that may invite their anger. Chat GPT, this is a bit tricky guys. It is vulnerable to inviting the wrath of the government. For example, if Baidu creates an AI chatbot like Chat GPT and a Chinese user asks the chatbot, "What is your opinion on the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident?" This is a very sensitive issue for the Chinese government, as it ended with a massacre in China. If the chatbot's response seems to insult the government, then Baidu will get into big trouble with the government. But IF THE QUESTION IS CENSORED, THE CHATBOT WILL LOSE CREDIBILITY IN THE EYES OF THE USER.

[@flowqi212]

I think there is still plenty of time for Google to catch up because to transition from search engines to "answer" engines we first need to solve 2 problems: 1) How can we make LLMs trustworthy (produce facts not fiction)? 2) How can we pay content creators for their work if the engine does not redirect to their pages anymore?

[@robr9313]

Hey I'm looking at your books table: is it for only genetic algorithms or are there different types of AI? I have a beginners AI programming understanding.

[@signalshift6676]

I don't think getting answers is the only category that counts.. or not even the biggest. I think, yes it's quite amazing to see and to use.. but googles ecosystem of applications that have synergy effects with each other feels way more developed. I think the real winner would be, who is able to build and weave such a chat assistant into their eco system.

[@MichaelCadenPike]

This is not the first time Google has been behind the curve, AWS would like a word.

[@andreameyer2948]

I wouzld like to program an adroid app, got the code from ChatGPT. But it seems very diffucult fo test the code if you are a non-programmer. Any ideas?

[@casvanmarcel]

Bing Chiling

[@qzorn4440]

Is it the future of Google or is it the future of AI? Who cares how you get there? It's just another stepping stone in history to get results.

[@kekguy]

We need to code Jessie!!

[@coscorrodrift]

What do you think is the future of mometizing all this? Sponsored answers seem like they would be against the point, and given how the models are trained and such I'm not sure if doing something like training a model so it gives you recommendations etc by paid sponsors is even feasible. It probably is but it sounds like a difficult problem. ChatGPT seems to be charging for Plus but for mass adoption there has to be another path to cash.

[@MichaelBrueckner]

When ChatGPT finally stops giving me error messages, I might use it. In the meantime, I'll alternatives.