The Amazing Properties of Water! (That Make Life Possible)

►Support us on Patreon: / thegoodstuff
►Subscribe: / thegoodstuff
►Follow us on Twitter: / goodstuffshow
►Follow us on instagram: goodstuffshow
►Like us on facebook: / thegoodstuffshow
►Sign up for our mailing list: eepurl.com/bnSOcH
Special Thanks to Our Patreon Patrons!
Taylor Becker, Sam McCartney, SR Foxley, Nathan J. Reid, Margaret Hutz, Brayden Butler, Matt, Max, Joseph Hegeman, Spass Merdjanoff, Colin Young, Bryce Daifuku, Ashley Beranek, Andrew Arrabaca, Jeff Brice, Matt Altieri, Torstein, Chris Hicks, and Waleed Alowaiyesh
Music by
Podington Bear
www.podingtonbear.com/
Chris Zabriskie
www.chriszabriskie.com
Unicorn Heads
www.unicornheads.com/
Todd Umhoefer (Old Earth)
oldearthcontact.bandcamp.com/
References:
www.livescience.com/52332-why...
science.howstuffworks.com/envi...
www.homesciencetools.com/a/pr...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothe...

[@suraj0909]

Huge respect for Water🙆‍♂️

[@danielauto3767]

The image at 2:00 shows the water molecule as a linear molecule. That's not correct. The correct shape is bent (like a boomerang). That's important. Without that bent shape water wouldn't have be a dipole.

[@Aragorn.Strider]

Daniel Auto is correct. In 120 degrees to be exact. So the effect is, both Hydrogens side combined gives a slightly more positive, and the Oxygene a slight negative effect. This results in a polar molecule. Similarly an NH3 has 3 Hydrogen attoms at the bottom, also in 3-dimensional 120 degrees separation, giving the only Nitrogene a slight negative side. However, when you add one more Hydrogen, like in Methane, or CH4, then the Carbon attom is surrounded on all sides equally with a Hydrogen attom, so there is no polar side.

[@6alecapristrudel]

The angles are 120 degrees only in methane. For water the angle is 104 degrees and in ammonia it's 108.

[@steevemartial4084]

Water molecules are shown in one specific place. In real life their position can't be exactly defined due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Also, atoms are shown as little balls. And covalent bonds should be represented as a molecular orbital instead of a smal stick joining the atoms, etc. My point is there's no reason to expect the representation to be expect them to be perfect. In that case a linear molecule does the job.

[@BothHands1]

Ah, I should have read the comments before I posted. I thought the same thing. On top of that, they used that image while specifically discussing the polarity of water lol. If water was linear, it would be non-polar xD

[@fiftyfat]

Yeah that suprised me too, i'm not sure the speaker and illustrator understand polarity, because they only mention the charges of different atoms, not the geometry of the molecule that is the source of the polarity.

[@Carpetman8900]

Great video, but I have two caveats. 1) Waters polarity causes its shape to bend at an angle of 105 degrees (i.e. the molecule is not flat). 2) Water vapour is invisible in the atmosphere, but the condensation of the gas makes it visible as a liquid (e.g. clouds).

[@rsandov00]

I love water! I can’t go a day without drinking it.

[@137Enki]

You can actually go a few days without drinking it....

[@abdouaboud7490]

@@137Enki idk I feel like dying if I don't drink for 3 days it's so delicious

[@RoughRoman]

Drug addict

[@bentoth9555]

Craig, you're killing me. Making me think you'd get me a glass of water then retracting the offer.

[@rebekahcastro5430]

I hope to someday have as much money as SR Foxley so I can freely give it away to creators like this.

[@JCrownMusic]

This show remains one of my favorites on KZbin. Keep it up!

[@kaselier1116]

Oh! I love it when the good stuff happens!

[@busyrand]

Very well done. Really enjoyed this.

[@Travisharger]

Enjoyed, this thanks.

[@blabby102]

You say that water has polarity while showing an image of a symmetric water molecule. This is just wrong.

[@cerulienceruleen6463]

Quadrupolar is still polar. So polar a dipole can't handle it. I'll find the door. I don't remember if they talked in the vid about the polarity of the solvant shielding electrostatic interactions. DNA strands don't hold as a double helix in vacuum, both strands being negatively charged.

[@jmanfiji]

It is if looked at from the right angle!

[@candicesirju551]

really is good stuff .. such a great video .. ty

[@istvansipos9940]

call me hopelessly optimistic, but I simply cannot imagine Europa with all her water, this excellent solvent, AND without life. where life is possible, life will be found

[@alexisrenaudin1017]

Water is the good stuff

[@curtpiazza1688]

Cool video ! Very informative and entertaining! 😂❤

[@ObjectsInMotion]

Water is by no means the only thing common to all life on earth. For one there's carbon macro-molecules, as well as of course the same 20 amino acids and double helix NA structure. They all have the same protein translation code, all have ribosomes, all have lipid bilayers, and all use ATP.

[@Melanie-ku6qj]

So interesting

[@misterhill5598]

Good stuff.

[@stress4u268]

What music did you use for the space part of the video

[@DhirpurJassa]

very good job guys

[@TheGoodStuff]

Thanks!

[@TheMississippiKing1]

At 6:29-6:35, you seem to forget pressure as a variable here. Water on Earth is liquid only because our planet's atmosphere has a high enough pressure. So some planets or moons could have a much higher pressure than even Earth's atmosphere. High pressure can force various gases to become liquid. Under 60 atm for example, ammonia remains liquid between -77 °C and 98 °C which is a temperature range that is actually somewhat comparable to water's temperature range at 1 atm. Before anyone says 60 atm would destroy any chance of life evolving, let me just say that life on EARTH (specifically extremophiles) can survive much higher pressure deep beneath the ocean. So it's not too much of a stretch to suppose that ammonia-based life could also form under such conditions.

[@steevemartial4084]

The blue color of water is due to the fact that it absorbs some red. It means water molecule can't protect anything from blue light, that's specifically the part of the spectrum it doesn't absorb...

[@BothHands1]

Absorption of red, and reflection of blue, meaning it's reflecting the higher frequency, more dangerous, bluer waves.

[@steevemartial4084]

Except water doesn't reflect more blue light. When you're deep in the ocean everything looks blue because blue light can travel a long distance through water. That's a definitive proof that water doesn't protect from blue light.

[@michaelbaldwin7434]

@@steevemartial4084 again not accurate

[@MakoTheFrog]

The REAL mystery here is does Matt dye his beard or his hair? we the people want answers!

[@jesusgonzalez6715]

pathetic maybe both? Or neither?

[@haloeightYT]

Jesus Gonzalez it's neither men growing red facial hair isn't that uncommon

[@waughj12]

A lot of people have a more ginger beard than head hair naturally.

[@sarahmc3186]

for real i want to know the truth

[@galadriel4101]

Cool

[@justinanthonyprochemdirect401]

A description found 'in the beginning.'" water is everywhere on Earth... when we look out at the universe water is one of the most common molecules we find. "

[@planetfall5056]

Its the panspermia Hypothesis. Come on guys, don't misuse the scientific version of theory.

[@TheGoodStuff]

You're totally right! Buuuut it is pretty commonly referred to as the Panspermia Theory.

[@TheMegaphone77]

wow have these been getting better or have I just been missing out?

[@oklandon09]

this is your daily reminder to hydrate

[@TheGamblermusic]

I want to support water, it seems pretty cool and useful, where can I donate ?

[@marcmiller3291]

Blade Runner background music!!

[@jakehoehne4459]

After you watch this video watch "but why" channel about water too. These videos change how I view molecules and especially water

[@blackkissi]

why isn't this channel just called "Matt Webber" ? Craig just says the same itro and outro for every video

[@KryssAA]

One question I read somewhere, as water is a good solvent, how can building blocks of life managed to keep their integrity ?

[@SSjordgnyayayay1]

Give me a glass of water

[@jacobburnell3792]

Weazey Water I'm thirsty!

[@rodgerpilkington6006]

No mention of Exclusion Zone water?

[@tomohawk9042]

( 2:00 ) Why does this have to have a bent angle? It's just a representation of a water molecule

[@6alecapristrudel]

The things that could hypothetically metabolize hydrogen, methane or other stuff would also need an oxidizer (like oxygen) to extract the energy from them. Otherwise it's like trying to light a candle in a vacuum.

[@benaaronmusic]

H-2-Oh yeah.

[@Billdow00]

I would love a glass of water. Thanks you for not getting me one tho. That would freak me out.

[@Theres_No_PlanetB]

EY nice that was a flower from a white dogwood. plz #govegan

[@reKomaAgain]

Cuz water is life

[@SimChucky]

Im no expert so I can't say if you got anything wrong. Thought it was a good enough explanation :-) Also, I wonder if there is any life form in the universe that does not work as humans do, i.e. don't require a fluid to live.

[@username-jn6uo]

I've always thought of this

[@Shlooomth]

I had a fever dream the other day about a startup who claims to invent a new chemical with all the properties of water and try to sell it to people to drink but it turns out it’s not actually exactly like water and it messes with the ecosystem.

[@BothHands1]

Why'd you use a linear model of water when discussing its polarity? The image of H2O you showed doesn't exist, and if it did, it wouldn't be polar.

[@Ninterd2]

It's true that water is polar, but you should have shown how the atoms are actually arranged since that's the reason. Carbon dioxide isn't polar despite having the same positive and electric charge, that's because the molecule isn't bent.

[@apex9841]

We haven't studied aliens yet so they may not need it

[@bobstephens5599]

Titan probe when?

[@nmikloiche]

But does water need life? Without life, water would be unknown to itself and to all the other non-water lifeless unknown things. Water, a true prodigy, would never be celebrated and it’s oddities never contemplated. Which makes me think about all the currently unknown unknowns just waiting for discovery.

[@MrQueso6191]

I'd like some water Greg.

[@Funger-_-]

"وجعلنا من الماء كل شيءٍ حي"

[@AEther0238]

Yes, you can get me a glass of water. With ice.

[@religionisalie]

🥤🥤🥤🥤🥤🧊🧊🧊🧊🧊

[@anthonywoodroffe9642]

Life doesn't need water ! Bodies need or use water ! Life as we know it needs water ! Why don't we know more ?

[@anthonywoodroffe9642]

So our deep space ships will need to be frozen balls of ice ? Or ice ships !

[@nanak3363]

Basically electrons , protons and neutrons are responsible for survival of other electrons , protons and neutrons and also cause of destruction.

[@Pouimatiom]

Oh Im early hehe ^^ I like your videos!

[@shakesmctremens178]

Hold the phone. I thought life was based on whisky. Scotch whisky to be more precise. Most likely a nice Speyside single malt.

[@smelkus]

Why are most of the other substances that expand when they solidify elements such as Gallium, Bismuth and Antimony but water is one of the few compounds that expand when it solidifies

[@brianhowe201]

I believe it has to do with the particular spacing of the atoms in the crystalline structure of ice. If anybody else has a more accurate answer, by all means, feel free to comment.

[@kiren3168]

Brian Howe When matter cool down they lose average kinetic energy so molecules will start grouping together. But because water has relatively strong intermolecular H bonds, it will start forming a regular crystal structure. So molecules start expanding the spaces between them. But when you heat water again to the point it gains enough kinetic energy it will break those regular H bonds and will "shrink" (losing volume)

[@smelkus]

is still dont get why most of the other matirials that expand on solidification are elements such as Gallium, Antimony and Bismuth when they dont have molecules like water. Why is this property more common in elements than compounds

[@HatiKeseorangan]

i just wonder, i also agree all places in this universe have water, but why only in the earth, and why does water on earth make life so special?

[@crazykaspmovies]

It might be necessary for life but I still don't like to drink too much of it. I hear they even use it as paint thinner nowadays.

[@randomman6351]

hippity hoppity you are now my property

[@Philippe_III]

WATER is amazing. It has memory and it can carry information, like thoughts, or diseases. We have not yet understood all that water is.

[@headphish1]

yo

[@TylerHainesSSTEACHER]

Seriously, brosky, I need water. I'll subscribe to Patreon if you hydrate yo pal.

[@Stinky_Suzie]

THIS VIDEO IS CONVINCING PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS

[@multiheroGamer0128]

stupid sh1t

[@religionisalie]

No it doesn't.... Your imaginary friend will never be real....

[@Unaost]

I am thirsty :'(

[@I-Sagittarius-l]

life got here carried by water from space .... looool

[@myslmysl]

A glass of water please. Please contact me for the shipping details.

[@ToaPohatuNuva]

The explanation of the polarity of the water molecule in this video was a bit disappointing

[@ssuntexx]

the viedo wont play

[@chaz4510]

Plants don’t breath 😉

[@darkdanne]

Guys you simply cannot depict a water molecule as a straight one! The fact that it is not straight is the very reason why it is a polar molecule

[@TheGoodContent37]

Hey, are you my cousin or something? Because of the name.

[@OboeFiles]

He said that water is useful because it stays in liquid phase over wide temps and because it is liquid solid and gas within the narrow temps of earth..... how can both be true??

[@MarkAhlquist]

I need to pee now

[@gauravmanwani9148]

Water is found everywhere on earth, except my girlfriend's undies...

[@mustafaimmortal5143]

quran says we create every living thing from water

[@rilluma]

actually there are some microbes that dont require water for living

[@michaelbaldwin7434]

not true

[@espositogregory]

Y'all barely touched upon the extent of water's vital properties, and the ways in which they allow it to be the proverbial life-blood of the cosmos. Of course, even if we were the only creatures in existence, one can see clearly how the laws of nature and parameters imposed through physics point to a universal purpose for reality. The Big bang was not an event occurring in space. Space is a consequence of a singularity being simultaneously actualized in multiple tandem expressions of forces imposed upon it. As an equalizing reaction to this prime cosmic action, a vast field of entropic expanse inverses these various singularities down to infinitesimally minimalized "particles" (*quantized singularity particles = Henons) by relativistically balancing the surplus possible energetic expression this manifold. By these identical initializing henon states cancelling out any dominant incarnation from vying for total existential adherence against the others, the stalemated henons' potentialities cause the actualized singularity to nullify. The unified singularity in still concordant stasis is without dimension, variance, or comparative subjection. Thus, when this nullification is induced, a "field" of voidance develops the antithetical properties of a vacuum. In the aforementioned scaling of the singularities, there would typically be no manner by which to achieve such a feat. However, with a dyadic pair of mutually straining "realms" interlocked through reciprocal co-opposed states, this becomes an eventuality. Using the inaccurate terminology of time/space it can be said that in an instant of escalation to accommodate the actualization of depressurizing energy, the voided realm of actualized space exponentially assumes geometric coordinates of optimal efficiency (tetrad volumetric ratio of -0- on an X-Y-Z axial coupling along a spherical surface area) while freely increasing in magnitude by virtue of this growth being arbitrarily incomparable alone. Meanwhile, all the innumerable henons locked in counter-spacial potentiality dynamically recalculate the would-be results of their manifested expressions in actual space. As these Henons are neither independent, nor wholly compatible as singularities in concert, these two functions of interplay reaches a tipping point. At some point while the hollow deep yawns open into a sufficiently large substrate, the collective revisions for countless henons solving each conceivable outcome of every possible path within an increasingly spacious arena. It is by this hyper-representational complexity & simplex abstract acceleration that facilitate commensurate transduction. This is what is modern science calls a "Big Bang". Every electron is actually the same singularity comparatively scaled relativistically down to the degree where "quantum" uncertainty allows empty space to balance the simultaneous expression of every initial and subsequent actualized event produced by these henons adhering to the specific vibratory tune of natural laws in need of a medium. Given all this, the empty space is not barren totally. Both realms remain intrinsically connected and the counter-spatial potential field of primed singularity remains free of chronolocality (space-time) while holographically maintaining a tether to every point in our physical realm of causation and actual forms/functions. This is why we can measure a large amount of veiled potential in the nothingness which is uniform. This is also why time can become dense of thin amidst the "fabric" of space. Any observer of such a system inevitably perceives the stimuli from successive points of procession manifesting as energetic events actualizing in a seemingly linear fashion. This is the illusion of time which arises through the stifling counter measure that naturally occurs as "empty" space attempts to regulate singularity's incoherency. This is accomplished by the relentless accounting of physical space's condition as the immaterial singularity collapses continual sets of possible harmonies from natural law's imposition on quantum potentiality. -This physical realm is a mirrored conversion of the quantum- -Science struggles to solidify QM because they haven't inverted the science: particles=temporal, fields=spatial strobing to the infinitely reducible rate of whatever time scale the observer operates at... Space is an inconsequential parameter for any quantum even to operate through. It only bears relevance at this scale by describing the total condition of our causal realm for the next multitude of relevant chords to excite potentiality & condense actuation once more.- -The singularity is a primal, undifferentiated still energy (Æther) which is NOT a field, but seems like one because of it's counter-spatial omni-positioned non-locality pervasive to our physical realm confined to chronolocalized (space time) subjection.- -electromagnetism is not the electron (henon) of atoms moving. It is a group secondary manifestation from specific pairings between the primary manifestations of energy, 1. Dielectric lines of force linking matter/actualized energy to the counter-spatial singularity (hence the need for relatively massive spatial dilutions) 2. Radial repellent forces erroneously labeled magnetism by man since time immemorial. Together these dyadic siamese twin heads coalesce in various secondary manifestations @ right-angular moment which accounts for the majority of necessary natural processes for conceiving a cosmos favorable to the mounting complexity required for life. See? The world is obviously geared to produce thinking matter holographically imagining the hologram they themselves arise out of equipped with a hologram projector (brain/psyche) which is a microcosmic proxy of the macrocosm (mirror mirror) to adequately see that which sees it's own lack of sight. -the only two options for science to define existential origins is by either 1. A creation or 2. An eternal . Option 1. Will force us to reevaluate the laws of thermodynamics, Option 2. will force us to reevaluate either the theoretical history of our universe via redshift reading, or dismissal of God(s) (or god-like proxies of indistinguishably ineffable descriptions.

[@mileskifield]

Nothing is impossible. Our biosphere is like a soap bubble floating around the cosmos.

[@edenswaterislife9214]

We are born of water. We create life born of water. Our food born of water in Mama earths womb. Water is life. They seek life on other planets as they poison our life water.

[@99sins]

Here's a huge info dump on why you should stop eating animal products if you want to save water on earth. If you love/appreciate water so much, stop supporting an industry that unnecessarily wastes so much of it. *Animal agriculture water consumption ranges from 34-76 trillion gallons annually.* - "Summary of Estimated Water Use in the United States in 2005". United States Geological Service - Pimentel, David, et al. "Water Resources: Agricultural and Environmental Issues". BioScience. (2004) 54 (10): 909-918 *Agriculture is responsible for 80-90% of US water consumption.* - "How Important is Irrigation to U.S. Agriculture?" USDA: Economic Research Service. 12 October, 2016 *Growing feed crops for livestock consumes 56% of water in the US.* - Jacobson, Michael F. “Six Arguments For a Greener Diet: How a More Plant-based Diet Could Save Your Health and the Environment. Chapter 4: More and Cleaner Water”. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2006. *Californians use 1500 gallons of water per person per day. Close to Half is associated with meat and dairy products.* - Fulton, Julian, et al. "California's Water Footprint". Pacific Institute. December 2012 *2,500 gallons of water are needed to produce 1 pound of beef.* *(NOTE. The amount of water used to produce 1lb. of beef vary greatly from 442 - 8000 gallons. We choose to use in the film the widely cited conservative number of 2500 gallons per pound of US beef from Dr. George Borgstrom, Chairman of Food Science and Human Nutrition Dept of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, "Impacts on Demand for and Quality of land and Water." )* - Robbins, John. "2,500 gallons all wet?" Earth Save: Healthy People Healthy Planet. - Pimentel, David, et al. "Water Resources: Agricultural and Environmental Issues". BioScience (2004) 54 (10): 909-918. (New) - "Water Content of Things: Data Table 19". The World's Water 2008-2009 - Beckett, J. L, Oltjen, J. W "Estimation of the Water Requirement for Beef Production in the United States". Journal of Animal Science. 1993. 71:818-826 - "Water". Environmental Working Group. - "Water footprint of crop and animal products: a comparison". Water Footprint Network. - Oppenlander, Richard A. Food Choice and Sustainability: Why Buying Local, Eating Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Won’t Work. Minneapolis, MN: Langdon Street, 2013. Print *477 gallons of water are required to produce 1lb. of eggs; almost 900 gallons of water are needed for 1lb. of cheese.* - "Water". Environmental Working Group. - "Food Facts: How Much Water Does it Take to Produce...?" Water Education Foundation. (New) *1,000 gallons of water are required to produce 1 gallon of milk.* - Hoekstra, Arjen Y. "The water footprint of food". Water for Food. - Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Hoekstra, Arjen Y. "A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products". Ecosystems (2012) 15: 401-415 *5% of water consumed in the US is by private homes. 55% of water consumed in the US is for animal agriculture.* - Jacobson, Michael F. “Six Arguments For a Greener Diet: How a More Plant-based Diet Could Save Your Health and the Environment. Chapter 4: More and Cleaner Water”. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2006. *Animal Agriculture is responsible for 20%-33% of all fresh water consumption in the world today.* - Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Hoekstra, Arjen Y. "A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products". Ecosystems (2012) 15: 401-415 - Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. et al. "The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparitive study in different countries and production systems". Water Resources and Industry. Vol. 1-2, March-June 2013, Pages 25-36 - Herrero, Mario, et al. "Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. vol. 110 no. 52 - Oppenlander DDS, Richard. "Freshwater Abuse and Loss. Where Is It All Going?" Forks over Knives. May 20,2013 (If you made it to the end of this post great job actually reading and yes, i stole all of these from the Cowspiracy website. Give it a watch)

[@Deshbhaktii]

Water is... 1:51 § 6:40

[@ceojr1963]

Life to get here.............the idea is that we aren't the origin of life..........I am an Earth centrist Earth is the seed not the other way round......But your video is still cool...Both of us, you and I need to agree we do not know which of us is correct. So next time you talk about where life happened first.. say You don't know. Not that I know either. Call it the water thought a + and - charge.

[@marilynonor7758]

Very educative! I made a video about water for detox.Check it out !

[@pbjracing14yearsago49]

Fun fact: you can drink water!

[@barryharris1681]

Just one of God's wonders when he formed the earth for humankind.

[@Mcornish86]

Barry Harris sure.... Humans want even around for most of Earth's history so how was it specifically made for us.. human centric thoughts knows no humility

[@barryharris1681]

And no one knows God's timetable. It sure makes more sense when God formed the earth, He placed it just the right distance from the sun, provided food, water and an oxygen atmosphere to support human life.

[@icedragon769]

Is The Good Stuff's intended audience middle school students, now? The first half of the video is like, day 1 of high school chemistry, and the illustration of the water molecule was embarassingly wrong.

[@immakitty88]

Rude. I'll get my own water.

[@mbalinkosi4814]

Genesis 1 verse 1 directed me this reseach.😃🙌, startled at how the Holy Bible Kjv is so accurate- Thanks for the video. Babies also develop and live water before they are born☺

[@andrasfogarasi5014]

I like carbon better.

[@oday_wasel]

Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? Holy Quran page 324

[@CSMartin]

water.org

[@ssuntexx]

this offends my cultuer

[@mholber]

Arent pretty much all of these properties of basically any liquid matter?

[@BothHands1]

no..

[@ObjectsInMotion]

Most liquids aren't polar. Only polar liquids have these properties. Water is one of the most polar liquids out there.

[@mholber]

Do things like ammonia and ethanol not also share all of these properties, and also occurs frequently in the universe? Water still doesnt seem that special, other than the fact that weve observed life in it.

[@BothHands1]

Mike Holberger as far as I know, neither of those molecules are less dense than their liquid form, meaning they’d freeze from the bottom up, and turn the whole planet into a ball of solid ice eventually. Also, the specific heat of water is double that of ethanol, so there goes ethanol’s ability to absorb large energy changes. Also, afaik, ethanol isn’t blue, meaning it wouldn’t reflect high frequency waves. Ammonia requires extremely low temperatures to remain liquid, and large bodies of it have never been found.

[@mike-bee]

If you had a British accent, I may of got through the whole video

[@danielgrantham9537]

Here's my biggest question... not to be mean but why is Craig in the video... he never seems to do anything useful

[@robertdubard7959]

Panspermia? Really? A VERY weak theory to put into such a fundamental message about water.

[@unvergebeneid]

This video got a bit too much wrong to be enjoyable. Come-on guys, quality over quantity! I was just about to subscribe :/

[@BratislavMetulskie]

disliked bc of beggin 4 likes. hope this yt bs stops

[@Larry82ch]

don't expect a like for that

[@BratislavMetulskie]

i did not beg, i disapproved the beg.

[@phoenixvette]

That's Stupid.

[@shakesmctremens178]

SteelVsTheNon-AlloyedMembersOfItsOwnSubstanceClassificationType -- Yes. Also subscribe/share/comment begging as well. As if I don't know what I think your video is worth.

[@HailSagan1]

yes, how dare they ask you to support the channel in a completely innocuous way. what bastards.

[@chrisfoster3772]

I know someone by the name of roger