Thank you, this helped me to explain properly to my roommate exactly why smoking around a bird is a horrible thing to do- worse to do to them than it would be to do to another animal since they keep the air inside for longer and pass it through the lungs twice, and thus end up absorbing more toxins
@mitchspurlock36262 жыл бұрын
it doesn't pass through the lungs twice it goes through once, the air sacs enable the air to flow through in only one direction which makes it so efficient
@RaisonDetre962 жыл бұрын
Mitch Spurlock Ok, but is the first half of his statement true? That the air spends more time inside their bodies than that of a mammal?
@mitchspurlock36262 жыл бұрын
@@RaisonDetre96 Nope, it spends a similar amount of time or less in the lungs than it does us, but their breathing is more efficient and that is why it's more dangerous. They extract more from the air into their bloodstream than we do.
@RaisonDetre962 жыл бұрын
Mitch Spurlock Ah very interesting, thank you.
@mhdfrb99712 жыл бұрын
@@mitchspurlock3626 so it's not really efficient
@kennethferland55798 жыл бұрын
Bats demonstrate that flight is not impossible without avian respiration, but it is likely limited in duration and altitude.
@pokoirlyase59315 жыл бұрын
There is a reason why bats don't have migration, for example, so you are right. Bat flight is very limited and inefficient. Compared to birds at least. But this air sac system didn't evolve for flight, it evolved originally to make saurischian and theropod dinosaurs lighter, and later was used by birds as a flight system.
@justanotherhunter66344 жыл бұрын
@@pokoirlyase5931 if i may just criticize your comment, you're incorrect about bat migration. Several species of bat have been observed migrating en mass, for instance the mexican free tail, or the hoary bat, they migrate from the midwest down to the southern US when the weather turns colder, they do indeed migrate.
@rafiqqasim5474 жыл бұрын
@@peternewbranch9263 New Zealand has 2 species of bat and is over 1,000 miles away from the nearest large landmass; your argument is invalid.
@u235u235u2354 жыл бұрын
@@pokoirlyase5931 i thought only the top of the dinosaur lighter to give lower center of gravity for improved turning without falling over?
@filiphabek2714 жыл бұрын
@@rafiqqasim547 Continent forming and separation eksplains that, every continent in the world was once part of Pangea during first two thirds of Mesozoic. His comment is valid.
@breannawidner84873 жыл бұрын
their anatomy is just so interesting and unique
@padmajaofficial58634 жыл бұрын
Today I saw so many migratory birds and dolphins too, I am going to mention some of the birds: Little Cormorant Large Cormorant Bar headed Goose Grey Heron Greenshank Redshank Greater Adjutant ( Garur) Black necked Stork Black kites and many more
@derpypigeon6 жыл бұрын
Wow I don’t think my dream of being a bird is going anywhere
Dr. Bird: inhale Me: **inhales** Dr. Bird: now inhale again but the other way Me: **confused, dying of asphyxiation**
@EmelieRosendalAlamo10 ай бұрын
I have a question, when they do the 2nd inhalation and the air goes in to the anterior sacs, does new air go in posterior sacs?
@colingtaylor215810 ай бұрын
At last, a good question! There is only one inhalation, the air goes through the lungs into both anterior air-sacs and posterior air-sacs, simultaneously. During exhalation, the air leaves both/all air-sacs through the lungs a second time. (I think).
@StephenGillie5 жыл бұрын
Birds got lungs like bagpipes.
@lanietalk3 жыл бұрын
swan song. when they die and air leaves their lungs
@IowaKim3 жыл бұрын
So birds are a 4 stroke engine. Interesting.
@leporellothegoldfinch3 жыл бұрын
What an amazing explanation. Thank you so much!
@jonmarkwilson9 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! One minor point to correct, birds have the most efficient respiratory system of any terrestrial vertebrate. Fishes win that one.
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
Jonathan Wilson Human lungs have the surface area of a tennis court. Fishes don't come close to that as they need to keep their gills exposed, and swimming around with court sized organs hanging out wouldn't be very sensible.
@danielcrubaugh99249 жыл бұрын
Jonathan Wilson Terrestrial means earth, that means that terrestrial only applies to animals that are land dwelling, fishes qualify as aquatic and not terrestrial
@jonasawi9 жыл бұрын
+Patrick McCurry Sure, we've got large lungs, but not efficient lungs. We extract about 20-25% oxygen from the air we breathe while fish extract 80-90%, so they are by far more efficient.
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
jonasawi Fish extract 80%+ of the oxygen from the air they breathe?
@jonasawi9 жыл бұрын
+Patrick McCurry I didn't say air, did I? They extract 80-90% of the oxygen available to them because they use a counter-current system. You could simply say "OK, fair" rather than prove to me that you're dumb. The fact that you don't understand what "efficient" means already told me as much so there's no reason to drive the point home.
@notfunnybbg2 жыл бұрын
Tyy! i did not understand what i was studying but this really helped me
@DanteYewToob10 ай бұрын
I still don’t understand how/where the air flows through the bones… but this is really cool and interesting!
@pool81577 жыл бұрын
Such a unique and simple way of explaining.....thanks
@MrJames10414 жыл бұрын
I have a question. You stated that 'Cervical Air Sacs' are the ones that are in the cranial region of the thoracic but in 2:50 you labeled them as 'Anterior Air Sacs'. It's a bit confusing.. Could you help me out?
@Wienke-schimmАй бұрын
I've read several explanations of bird respiration, and this was the first time it began to make sense. I made a diagram so I could track what was happening in the overlapping cycles. It seems that during exhalation, both batches of air move forward, whereas during inhalation they move in opposite directions. I'm puzzled how the old air is forced forward out of the parabronchi in the lungs during inhalation. Since the lungs are rigid, I assume it is simply the pressure of the new air moving forward from the posterior air sacs.
@wishby64415 жыл бұрын
Incredibly helpful video for explaining how the system works!
@happymevids5 жыл бұрын
Does that [lack of diaphragm] mean that broken ribs are more likely to be fatal in birds? Brilliant video xx
@hellomark111 ай бұрын
I mean, everything is more fatal for birds, so probably :) they have very few redundant organs, they're just built to be light and fast, so they sacrifice a lot of other things.
@MrTwostring10 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed the video. My one observation is that it's not clear that the avian respiratory system is related to flight. There's evidence that flightless dinosaurs had a similar system, and in any event, bats have a mammalian lung and yet can fly just fine.
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
MrTwostring They can't fly at altitude and they're locking into a much smaller maximum size than birds. At least bats have proper lungs unlike really small insects.
@MrTwostring9 жыл бұрын
Patrick McCurry Flightless dinosaurs can't fly at altitude either.
@juliafraa64192 жыл бұрын
Back in that time there was much less oxygen in the air than there is today so that is why this feature originally came about but now it continues to exist in birds probably so they can fly at such high altitudes and for such long distances
@MrTwostring2 жыл бұрын
@@juliafraa6419 - I don't buy it. EVERY animal alive today is descended from an animal that was alive then. Either way - I think you have it backwards. Here's a random bit found from a quick google search. - - - - - The atmosphere of the Earth 80 million years ago was discovered to have 50% more oxygen than modern air. Brenner and Landis found that for all gas samples taken from amber 80 million years old the oxygen content ranged between 25% to 35% and averaged about 30% oxygen. Cretaceous air was supercharged with oxygen.
@isspenguin9 ай бұрын
@MrTwostring: Atmospheric oxygen levels fell from a high point of 28% in the Late Permian to 20% at the PTB, and 16% in the Early Triassic
@pabs0411 жыл бұрын
Great video, just one comment. At the beginning you state that the avian respiratory system is the most efficient in the animal kingdom. That is incorrect. The most efficient respiratory system is the countercurrent respiratory system found in fish. They are able to exchange at an efficiency ration of 80-90%. Avians have a cross-current system, and while efficiency is superior to that of humans, it still falls short of the fish. But again, great video!
@spacecadet284 жыл бұрын
fish dont breathe air.
@EjPwned3 жыл бұрын
It’s the most efficient in air breathing vertebrates
@basennel6 жыл бұрын
Great and interesting video!!! Thank you for sharing.
@alfarosiarsita3 жыл бұрын
If human lung is a Piston engine, bird lung is Rotary engine
@IanThompson110 жыл бұрын
That was brilliant, very helpful. Just to point out that bats use a conventional mammalian lung and fly remarkably well (migrating long distances, but not at altitude). Curious that birds have such a complex system when a straightforward in out lung would have 'got them off the ground'(!)
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
Ian Thompson One theory is that proto-dinosaurs evolved them to deal with the major drop in oxygen after the Permian Triassic extinction when 96% of all marine life died out. That it later turned out perfect for flight was just a lucky coincidence.
@Zache91105 жыл бұрын
@@patrickmccurry1563 That would be a great example of an exaptation!
@HappyBeezerStudios Жыл бұрын
@@patrickmccurry1563 Pretty much how evolution goes at things. Have something with a minor advantage, improve and build on that, then find another function for it. Feathers pretty much for thermal insulation and courtship before being used for gliding and finally flight.
@Benjaminbumblebee Жыл бұрын
God designed and created these systems. The design speaks of this itself.
@dolsopolar11 ай бұрын
@@patrickmccurry1563archosaurs evolved them long before that as pterosaurs, another archosaur achieved flight before end triassic. so that wouldn't really be the case since other large archosaurs with the same system as dinosaurs went extinct.
@timone10027 жыл бұрын
So are they 2 stroke or 4 stroke?
@heytasker6 жыл бұрын
timone1002 you're thinking of chicken... you don't stroke chicken, you choke it.. 🤣
@youssifkabaili52635 жыл бұрын
Are you sure
@MoisesQuirozT4 жыл бұрын
More like axial flow turbine LOL
@OttomanZC8 жыл бұрын
I don't get it. What's the advantage of this system? A constant air flow? But I can't see the constant air flow, the lungs only get air when the abdominal sacs are emptied?
@lifegaurdmuaythai958 жыл бұрын
yeah, just to ensure a constant air flow. Because the birds are having to work so hard to stay in the air they need to make sure they have 'secondary tanks' that are used whilst the air in the lungs are being used. Its just to make sure the bird always has air.
@OttomanZC8 жыл бұрын
Dale Kingston Oh ok thanks for your help!
@MsMauDau2 жыл бұрын
thank you , very clear explanation. really helps!
@TheGabXD8 жыл бұрын
wow amazing video. Thank you so much!!!
@rebeccacurran83652 жыл бұрын
Very clearly explained!
@Deeer694202 жыл бұрын
This is great! Exactly what I was looking for!
@SuriyaKsr10 ай бұрын
Good explanation 🎉
@YunyunFeng-y7d9 күн бұрын
Sorry, I didn't catch that. Within the lungs the air passes through "what"?(about 2:28)
@IroVinh6 күн бұрын
*Parabronchi*
@anitacoogan48222 жыл бұрын
thank you, often when I find the injured birds they are gasping for air ( and unfortunately spasms) they hit the glass building hard and fall many flors to the hard cement, I flip them as quick as I can off their backs on to their belly as often see perished on their backs. A friend & I rescue birds . A recent youtube video shows us in Newark NJ, the video is named ( Volunteers give migrating birds injured in N.J’s biggest city a second chance ) The Raptor Trust made a older video when we first started named ( Window Strikes in the Business District ) of us picking up injured Warblers.
@laracorbo2192Ай бұрын
you can put stickers on the windows so they dont crash!
@anitacoogan4822Ай бұрын
@@laracorbo2192 These are office buildings, I suggested but they will not do this small thing. But it is an excellent suggestion
@hebamostafa88052 жыл бұрын
what the function of air sac in the embryonic life
@peppermintcactus80185 жыл бұрын
What would that feel like? Human breathing seems a lot more simple to describe. Would it feel any different if a human were able to do this, if they described it to someone?
@indrajeet4 жыл бұрын
Our breathing would be allot more efficient, since we would be able to absorb 90% of the owygen we breath in. We would have a llot more energy potential, speed, stamina, power e.t.c.
@BerryTheBnnuy3 жыл бұрын
@@indrajeet We'd actually be more efficient than birds if we breathed like this. Our red blood cells are a lot smaller than that of birds. So if we had the avian respiratory system, we'd be even more over powered than we already are.
@juritudi57yearsago59 Жыл бұрын
@@BerryTheBnnuy if we had avian respiration however, we’d be getting infections and respiratory diseases from smoke and air pollutants even cleaning products much more than if we had mammalian respiration. It has a drawback because of how efficient it at utilizing oxygen.
@barbarakrall43317 ай бұрын
@@juritudi57yearsago59 Exactly! Any experienced bird owner understands that avian pets are FAR more sensitive to indoor air pollutants and airborne toxins than are mammalian pets and have to take great care to avoid exposing their birds to such toxins. Newbie bird owners, unless they have exerted the effort to learn in advance why birds' respiratory systems are so sensitive, may learn from the school of hard knocks when their bird suddenly drops dead.
@Termini_Man6 ай бұрын
I'm surprised, I would have thought that birds would have 2 tubes, one where the air comes in through, and one where it exits through.
@SassePhoto2 жыл бұрын
Excellent thank you so much
@sofiehenrysonrudvall4 жыл бұрын
Hello Kelly ! We have seen your movie about birds breething and we think it is very good. Is it possible to show this movie in an exhibition about birds? This exhibition will open 19TH of September 2020, in about five weeks in Uddevalla, Sweden. We need to translate the movie.
@sturlamolden7 жыл бұрын
You forgot an important part of the bird respiratory system, the pneumatic bones in the skeleton.
@elusuariosecreto24585 жыл бұрын
She mentioned them
@joshhattig94273 жыл бұрын
also are we t are we talking about air going into the bird or the birds respiratory system
@kashyapprajapati84903 жыл бұрын
Interesting the bird lung study
@biancazaffarano813 жыл бұрын
Kelly have emailed you to ask permission to use with attribution. Please let me know.
@Hun_Uinaq2 жыл бұрын
I don’t think this adaptation is that crucial in order to fly. Bats don’t have it and manage to fly pretty well. I’m sure it helps enormously though.
@nayabbirds7213 жыл бұрын
And its treatment?
@mahamaha-lr4xy8 жыл бұрын
simple easy and good explanation
@studiojox4 жыл бұрын
Hi could We use, show this video in our exhibitatin at a small museum in Sweden?
@UkeGirl10010 жыл бұрын
TRULY informative!!!
@a-splays44192 жыл бұрын
You posted 7 years ago , how's your life now?
@linearOffBurleigh2 жыл бұрын
Birds swim through air osmotically?
@ParhoLikhoAgayBhado8 жыл бұрын
superb...
@kelseycee11 жыл бұрын
great video, but you misspelled metabolic at the beginning of the video
@vishwagoal4925 жыл бұрын
How many tracheal ring in birds??
@T-She-Go7 жыл бұрын
You're a blessing, thank you :)
@gluestick48334 жыл бұрын
Thanks This video was helpful
@jessicalv6442 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful!!
@benitomussolini-x7 жыл бұрын
Been superbly understood..
@Dawer8D6 жыл бұрын
gracias señorita
@youssifkabaili52635 жыл бұрын
I’m gonna see the birds breathing air.
@asgwilson10 жыл бұрын
Excellent!!
@passivemoon3 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@user-cl3gz9ey1w5 жыл бұрын
Can you make playlist for bird in your channel please
@zhilahesani83849 жыл бұрын
do negative pressure in respiratory system of birds?
@chase9182737 жыл бұрын
What?
@TragoudistrosMPH6 жыл бұрын
So many questions... what about crocodiles and bats?
@ryoumaf32506 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@ipodzz554 жыл бұрын
Your teacher shared this, i am right?
@laylaa.hassan51015 жыл бұрын
good work
@Arjun08ac5 ай бұрын
Thanks
@verzen9 жыл бұрын
Bats have lungs like we do and they can fly just fine. Just saying...
@laurenk76319 жыл бұрын
Kyle Rutherford But birds can also fly at higher altitudes due in part to their respiratory adaptations and can grow larger and still fly. The largest flying bat, Golden-capped fruit bat weights approx 1.1kg, while the largest extant flying bird the Kori bustard weighs approx 21kg.
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
Lauren K Largest flying insects were dragonfly like creatures with 2 foot wingspans long before flying reptiles and dinosaurs.
@MrTwostring9 жыл бұрын
Patrick McCurry Don't forget that giant dragonflies lived when there was more oxygen in the atmosphere. Yes, it's an interesting question why some birds are bigger than any bat. It seems there are many possible explanations.
@patrickmccurry15639 жыл бұрын
They evolved then, but survived to a little past the time of more oxygen, so that theory doesn't quite mesh with what happened.
@tonyhickey88499 жыл бұрын
+Kyle Rutherford Bat lungs are still quite specialised with very thin walls and very high surface areas for their body mass. So they are similar in structure to us, but not the same.
@אבי-ו9ז Жыл бұрын
תודה רבה
@cristinabesenmuelas70094 жыл бұрын
Hi! Me and my friend are doing a science work and we need to know if you are a teacher or similar and if it is yes, what institution. Good job with the video by the way!
@dhadham91358 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@PoultryScholars3 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@eileenbaha65443 жыл бұрын
in va school and this is so much better explanined lol
@Tnbeazy2 жыл бұрын
awesome!
@alonir1018 жыл бұрын
Cool video thanks :D
@ak-ul3nc8 жыл бұрын
excellent
@brentthegravityman11 жыл бұрын
Kelly whats up with the chicken have you considered using a flight bird skeleton?
@melinafava494310 жыл бұрын
Thank you ! Help alot ! :D
@القرآنُكتابي-ض8ل6 жыл бұрын
ياريت بي ترجمه عربي
@timebert94672 ай бұрын
Someone needs to have a word with bats
@hatsamb7 жыл бұрын
You are my hero
@dirtygrin91298 жыл бұрын
All I heard was "Abdominal sex"... I wonder how you could do that. JK XD
@fahimjaowad87173 жыл бұрын
I want this.
@stojadinovicdushan4 жыл бұрын
Wow
@mindf4rt6 жыл бұрын
I'm here because of It's Ok To Be Smart's 2M sub video. How are there not more videos about how birds breathe?
@priyanshu35465 жыл бұрын
waah
@octopusph.d77372 жыл бұрын
insane
@nicolocaramori29645 жыл бұрын
LIKE PER IL GRANDE BERTOLUCCI
@fahijaansari45028 жыл бұрын
I don't get it first you said that inhalation meant breathing out in a bird next you said during inhalation the air is breathed in
@itsladydi6268 жыл бұрын
its a two phase process for one complete cycle, the air from inhalation one does not leave the body until inhalation two (due to the air reservoirs which are absent within ourselves and our single phase respiration cycle)
@CheapSushi8 жыл бұрын
When they "inhale", it goes to the sacs in the rear first, when they "exhale", THEN it goes to the lungs and the front sacs and leave out the nose again.
@kx45322 жыл бұрын
Great now explain it right
@crappyaccount7 жыл бұрын
Damn, birds are more.complicated than I thought
@ОлександраГілевич-ю6ж3 жыл бұрын
Кщачд
@TreDogOfficial Жыл бұрын
". . .the act of flight would likely be impossible." Never met a bat before🦇 Albeit they do fly rather clumsily
@mendesarmy9216 Жыл бұрын
bats don't fly at the same altitudes or anywhere near as far or as fast as birds do
@mhdfrb99717 ай бұрын
@@mendesarmy9216 they could still fly regardless
@fr41636 жыл бұрын
great video, just stop talking to the viewer like they are a baby. thats a very american thing
@IAmDeadlySerious7 жыл бұрын
Whooa so like, how high would birds get if they smoked weed dude!!1
@horaceball54185 жыл бұрын
I am an engineer and this is the product of intelligent design by a God with an IQ of infinity, it is not the result of time, nature and chance which has an IQ of zero. Praise God!
@johncitizen5130 Жыл бұрын
Shut the fuck up 😂 If what you are looking at is all that is left of all competing species to have ever lived, thus only the most capable and well adapted survive, of course it's going to look like they were designed for their exact lifestyles.
@walterlane88905 жыл бұрын
Proof positive that birds did not evolve from reptiles
@DrMarkFrazier5 жыл бұрын
All amniotes evolved from reptiles. Can you propose another phylogeny to explain your statement?
@walterlane88905 жыл бұрын
Frazier their respiratory systems are so fundamentally different that evolution from a reptile respiratory system to a avian system is impossible.
@DrMarkFrazier5 жыл бұрын
So what explanation for the origin of birds and their lungs do you follow, if not the fossil record and phylogenetics?
@walterlane88905 жыл бұрын
@@DrMarkFrazier I am a creationist because it is the only logical and scientific explanation of origins. Evolution defies logic. DNA does not create itself anymore than a computer program can write itself. Things always go from order to chaos according thermodynamic theory.
@DrMarkFrazier5 жыл бұрын
@@walterlane8890 I am an Episcopal priest and also a professor of biology (not sure if either is a side hustle). While I believe in God the creator, I also acknowledge that life is not understandable in any rational sense without accepting evolution. If I may ask one further question of you, how old do you believe the earth and the universe to be?