To learn more, read Dylan's article here: bit.ly/2J78xwE. And check out our Netflix show! Explained: bit.ly/2sjJv6K - joss
@Wookien6 жыл бұрын
Why don't they edit the parasite genes instead? Seems counter intuitive to kill another species.
@n22016 жыл бұрын
What happens to the bats and other species that feed on mosquitoes
@Vox6 жыл бұрын
Some important facts to keep in mind when discussing gene drives: 1) There are more than 3,000 mosquito species, including over 800 in Africa alone. These researchers are only targeting a few that transmit human diseases. So far there isn't evidence that malaria-carrying mosquitoes are key species for ecosystems (nothing that feeds on them exclusively). Though of course, there can be ripple effects that we can't foresee. 2) Gene drives only work on sexually-reproducing organisms, so you couldn't use this to spread viruses or bacteria. 3) Gene drives work in animals with short generation times (mosquitoes have a new generation every couple of weeks.) So inserting a gene drive into a human or other large mammals would take reeeeeeeallly long to have population-wide effects. -joss
@ReubenJBrown6 жыл бұрын
Vox, always love your videos, joss. loving explained on netflix too! ❤️
@KIKE.KAWASAKI6 жыл бұрын
It would be as effective with other diseases as zika, dengue and chikungunya of different species of mosquitoes in continents like South America.
@Chadx26 жыл бұрын
This is great news because as a person born in the Democratic republic of Congo, I'm one of the malaria survivors so the sooner CRISPR is brought around (& REGULATED) to remove malaria, the happier and more prosperous the future of Africa will start to become.
@ShankarSivarajan6 жыл бұрын
I'm glad your pathological desire for REGULATION is satisfied.
@Chadx26 жыл бұрын
Shankar Sivarajan I mean.. if CRISPR is misused we could have Godzilla sized mosquitoes flying around right? Lol
@ShankarSivarajan6 жыл бұрын
+Crab Synth That gives me an idea: What if we created a gene-drive to make flightless mosquitoes?
@KamiltheCamel6 жыл бұрын
Monkeeh First, I am pretty sure they have found that mosquitos are only part of a food source and most animals can eat other stuff. Second, yes some sacrifices must be made, but these are MILLIONS of people dying yearly. Sorry, but if AMerica or Europe were dealing with Malaria you know you would be ok with hurting the environment in order to keep yourself safe. We have already damaged the environment a lot. This could damage it, but it will only be one small thing on a very large list filled with much, much bigger things.
@CodeRiseFN6 жыл бұрын
Filius Dei congrats for having a life. I am happy.
@CuriosityCulture6 жыл бұрын
Vox videos always has a way to explain something in such a beautiful way.
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
Too right Harshil! Have loved Vox's science-related content for years now! What did you think of their 'Thaw' series?
@CuriosityCulture6 жыл бұрын
Aspect Science dude I love them. I'm big into storytelling. If you can tell a good story, you don't have to have a 'fancy' camera. Good story and some editing skill can make your video pop
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
100% agree! The more videos we make the more we realise just that - it's almost the more simple visually you make it and the more focused on the story the better! A story to pull someone from point to point seamlessly, like Vox manages to do, is key!
@mmhoss6 жыл бұрын
Yeah except that dumb bit of propaganda about polygamy
@A_Nobbit6 жыл бұрын
*cough* Kurzgesagt *cough*
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
*The real question is who do you call when mosquitoes attack...* The SWAT team!
@CalpolMeister6 жыл бұрын
The door
@watermoof49146 жыл бұрын
CalpolMeister is right over there
@CalpolMeister6 жыл бұрын
Nah, I can't even lie, I like a good pun
@isaiahcabino64316 жыл бұрын
s t o p
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
Tehehe, CalpolMeister speaks the truth: no one can lie, you all love a good pun!
@diulikadikaday6 жыл бұрын
I'm honestly getting a little teary-eyed watching this. It would be amazing to see millions of people saved. I have a 3 year old kid and I just started thinking how lucky he is to not have to suffer from Malaria.
@justlisten826 жыл бұрын
There was a mosquito buzzing around me while I watched this video... I feel like I may have accidentally given them a heads up. I'm sorry. Ps. Update, I killed it we should be ok.
@annieh81276 жыл бұрын
An eye opening video about the eradication of a disease that kills millions and the first four comments say "first"
@return60056 жыл бұрын
I like the malaria resistance choice better than killing the mosquito population as that will affect the ecosystem significantly.
@r.b.46116 жыл бұрын
yes
@AdamSmith-gs2dv6 жыл бұрын
Same, lots of animals such as bats rely on mosquito's for food. Plants also rely on mosquito's to pollinate. By killing them you effect those.
@seb_59696 жыл бұрын
It will allow people to settle in the jungle of Africa... that means that the super Fauna there, such as Rhinos and Elefant are basically exstinct.
@nicholasvsjesse6 жыл бұрын
iBlueDust Same here, malaria provides no benefit to Mosquitos, and so has no unintended environmental consequences as a result.
@baggern6 жыл бұрын
nicholasvsjesse yeah and no. Malaria controls overpopulation
@felipebier76 жыл бұрын
It makes my skin crawl when I hear this argument about "nature" coming from people in developed countries, while people starve or perish from these illness everyday in other parts of the world. I strongly agree with the researcher's last words, "nature", this huge abstraction from which we are not detached, is not moral. Our politics as humans will dictate the use of these technologies, as it is the case for anything. Do those people even think how hunger and sickness halts democracy, for example? How it is hard to fight a corrupt government if you have to worry about having clean water?
@jamestang12276 жыл бұрын
7:46 Such as? Genetic modification, which isn't necessarily infertility, is still the closest solution we have so far.
@atkillz65896 жыл бұрын
James Tang ikr. Says there are safer ways, doesn’t even state them wtf you can tell she has no idea what’s she talking about
@rodrigoborges38766 жыл бұрын
The problem with GMOs is that, as any other technology, it can be used for good or for bad. People openly relate GMOs with the bad usage (making plants resistant to agrotoxics which makes the agrobusiness crank up on poison usage, making plants with seeds that are infertile so producers would have to buy seeds from the manufacturer, such as monsanto etc) and that clouds their eyes on the possibility that good, well regulated and well intended usage of the technology could have (making crops that are more nutritious, making crops that could grow on harsh climates, making crops naturally resistant to pests without requiring agrotoxic usage, making crops that restore the soil where they were planted or capture extra carbon from the atmosphere, etc) It's the same thing with nuclear energy. Nuclear power is by far the safest (even when you count deaths due to nuclear plant accidents, it's still less than every other form of energy combined. ourworldindata.org/what-is-the-safest-form-of-energy ), most cost-effective (cost both in terms of money and environmental impact, solar and wind are great, but very expensive, maintenance-heavy and less reliable) out there, but due to sensationalism about power plant accidents and fear of nuclear weaponry, the public is strongly opposed to it.
@miwoisthata51866 жыл бұрын
The video mentioned scientists looking for a vaccine, that would probably be the option that isn't as invasive to the whole ecosystem of Africa as erasing a complete species of mosquitoes
@MvrMarieLaurence6 жыл бұрын
Like you're saying they are 'looking' for a vaccin, it will take at least another 10 years, another 10 years that little children die from this horrible dissease.
@miwoisthata51866 жыл бұрын
Can't really say if it will take 5 or 10 years for a vaccine, and the scientists themselves said it will take 2-5 years for phase 2, and we don't know how long that will take. I think the time until we have a vaccine and the time until we have genetically modified mosquitoes will be the same. However, this is Sub-Saharan Africa we're speaking of, so even if there is a vaccine available, many people won't be able to afford it, won't trust this new medicine (we see that right now with Ebola), there will be huge political obstacles and the infrastructure is extremely bad in parts of those countries. So yes, I believe altering the mosquitoes is the more efficient way, but the arguments of critics hold a lot of value. Imagine we eradicate that species of mosquitoes, now there is a pretty big link missing in the food chain and we don't quite know the effects of that yet. In general, altering the gene code of an animal could easily be done wrong, and we don't notice until they're set free on the continent. The genetic approach in my opinion is much more risky when looking at the ecosystem (which is already fragile in Africa), but when done right, will have a way better impact than vaccines or other medicine
@lewdongan26986 жыл бұрын
Son: I hope there will be flying cars in the future! Dad: No! we made mosquitoes to fight malaria!
@wangdangdoodle49446 жыл бұрын
Lew Dong An as seen on TV in black and white 🚽, we'd have more spare time and I need new radials ToO
@sheikhheisen6 жыл бұрын
To be fair, I would rather have millions of deaths prevented instead of a cool vehicle.
@staind25236 жыл бұрын
Also to be fair, I don't think anyone actually wants everyone to have a flying car. Maybe just you, but not everyone. Imagine all of our traffic in the sky above you...what a terrifying thought.
@derekdeadlifts29865 жыл бұрын
There will be both hopefully.
@rea85856 жыл бұрын
OMG, how cool is this video and how amazing is science! Really hope something can be done to get rid of malaria in the shortest time possible!
@wangdangdoodle49446 жыл бұрын
Quick Fix agreed
@derekdeadlifts29865 жыл бұрын
Agreed I'm in college for biotechnology, I love this stuff! Personally I will probably be working for a supplement company after I graduate, however I hope to do some research with muscular dystrophy at some point in my life. I know if we could find a cure for that it would feel amazing and we may be closer than you think. i have vaguely touched on it in one of my videos.
@derekdeadlifts29865 жыл бұрын
@Darius Beaumont I am 23 years old but I have never left the United States lol.
@Claymann715 жыл бұрын
Also: best video of the month. Shame it took this long to find. Take your Sub!
@codyharper38246 жыл бұрын
"I look at the earth as something we've gotta.. we gotta keep going for us and for other animals. But I don't look at it as this morally benevolent place... It's... It's a horror show that we're trying to manage as best we can." #TRUTH
@asclepiusgod37916 жыл бұрын
"Earth is a protected wildlife refuge. See, we're using it to replenish the mosquito population, which I remind you is an endangered species." - Pleakley
@BlackLlight074 жыл бұрын
Two women who involve in developing CRISPR gene editing have won Nobel Prize in Chemistry today.
@arando6896 жыл бұрын
I don't get how Ms. Dana Perls sees her argument that we can find a way to fix this that "aren't about permanently altering nature". Humans have been altering nature to our benifit for as long as we have existed. When we were just small farming communities, we would always choose to breed the crops that yielded better or was more resilient than those that were weak and didn't produce a lot of food for our effort. We put ourselves in the way of "nature" breeding the crops naturally. And today, our crops look drastically different than from, say, 1000+ years ago--for example: bananas, watermelons, mango, etc. And dogs and other domestic animals too. We bred the dogs that were more loyal, the sheep that had more wool, the horses that were faster and less aggressive. Dogs, specifically, have been selectively bred by us, over decades and maybe even centuries, for qualities other than loyalty. We have dogs that are cute, or large, or fluffy, and many other traits. If nothing happened that "permanently altered nature" as she put it, we probably wouldn't even exist.
@Xeloss966 жыл бұрын
I could listen to Joss's voice for ever!
@thoyo6 жыл бұрын
I'm all for this, but we have to be keenly cognizant of unintended consequences. Recently, the rise of super resistant bugs due to overuse of antibiotics and antibacterials comes to mind.
@charlieshin98686 жыл бұрын
this has nothing to do with this. Its genetically modifying them directly not indirectly. Obviously if we used pesticide that much it was only a matter of time before they adapt same applies with humans, But Genetically modifying it is really a whole new thing
@Amok836 жыл бұрын
I understand your point, and agree in the way of thinking. But that line of thought arises from the knowledge of the consequences of misuse of pesticide and antibiotics. I think that the point here is that we still don't know what is misusing CRISPR technology. But I have faith in proper research.
@thoyo6 жыл бұрын
Charlie Shin Understood. My reference wasn't meant to confuse genetic modification with the use of antibiotics. I meant to highlight the possibility of unintended consequences in the ecosystem etc. Such as the knock on effect on wildlife such as mosquito hawks which feed on mosquitos and the fish that eat them, and the fish that eat those fish, and so on. I'm no Luddite. I'm quite excited about this new technological development, I just hope that they're mindful of possible consequences.
@aronseptianto81426 жыл бұрын
and that's why my friend testing is a thing
@saltpot6 жыл бұрын
thoyo Do mosquito Hawks exclusively eat mosquitos, and do they primarily eat the Gambiae species? In my reading on this topic, it was my understanding that there were very few species that rely on these mosquito species as a large part of their diet.
@kristychung69025 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Dylan and Joss! I'm researching ways biotechnology can help save endangered animals and although many children have dies, wildlife would be impacted greatly, too. I'm definitely going to find ways to help and can't wait to present this in my work for class. Thank you, guys!
@MyeongsooChoi6 жыл бұрын
I guarantee that if malaria were spreading in a developed country, the time needed for eliminating the disease would take at most 6 months.
@alquinn85766 жыл бұрын
Fact: 1,000 Africans = 1 American
@HowardxDuck6 жыл бұрын
Why did you guys at 4:22 make them do a Skype call interview when it’s obvious that they’re in the same studio with the same lighting and audio quality? It literally looks like they’re right next to each other based on the background
@SarveshShah6 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts!
@Vox6 жыл бұрын
Dylan is based in new york. I'm in DC. -joss
@HowardxDuck6 жыл бұрын
Vox ahh ok. You have to admit though that it looks like that though right? Great video
@SarveshShah6 жыл бұрын
Ohh makes sense
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
🐛🐝🌿 Such an interesting point he makes at the end _"It's a horror show that we're trying to manage as best we can"_ - would love to hear what people think about that. Thoughts?
@helkafen1006 жыл бұрын
It sounds like his worldview has been heavily influenced by his field of study. Ecosystems can also be wonderful and they provide us everything we need.
@ilanyahav74846 жыл бұрын
It is a complete hubris to think we can manage the planet's ecosystems. Science and technology (including genetic and geo-engineering) are amazing and have big roles to play in bringing back balance to disrupted and unhealthy bioregions all over the globe. Defeating malaria is an important goal for humanity, but we need to be humble and understand that there are always complex ecological implications for every intervention we make in natural systems. Just as a reminder - weather patterns are changing, oceans are acidifying, a rediculous number of creatures are going extinct.. There are other ways to combat Malaria - it was a serious epidemic in Mandatory- Plalestine / pre-Israel, and was completely eradicated: www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-how-malaria-shaped-the-future-map-of-israel-1.5866664
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
helkafen100, that is definitely true - it does sound like that, so there might be a bit of bias going on. But at the same time, the fact that his field of study _is_ this could mean that what he says holds more weight?
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
Love the responses on this by the way guys, can see this becoming a good conversation!
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
ilan yahav, will definitely check out that article. What you say about us managing the ecosystems is very true - we do not and probably will not ever have the power to be able to control or manage the complex ecosystems of the natural world. But isn't what he's saying about 'managing as best we can' really in response to the people that claim nature is a beautiful and sublime place that doesn't need any intervention? That's how I saw what he was saying; nature _isn't_ fluffy and sometimes in can be down right terrifying (eg rapidly evolving pathogens) so we're essentially just trying to keep the worst of it at bay the best we can
@ozzymendoza32166 жыл бұрын
Joss Fong is hands down my favorite journalist in vox keep it up!
@finntran16726 жыл бұрын
CRISPR-CAS9 is safer than any other approaches, despite it being so-called “Genetic Modifies (Modification)”. When you alter the genetics of a population, if will for surely alter the gene pool of the entire species (along with Gene Drive). However, this effect only stay WITHIN the species of the initial modification. Unlike pesticides, which can travel up to the food chain and potentially affect humans, genetic modification cannot spread to other species or even sub-species. The only concerns left are: 1. Will there be imbalance in the food chain if this species of mosquito is gone? No. Other less troublesome mosquito species will replace this species for sure. Nature can fill in these ecological niche very fast, and it’s even faster with insects. 2. What happen if these genetic naturally mutate and create “super-mosquito”? This is a good question. That’s why we must test these new bio-technology, but, as of right now, there’s no such thing. 3. What happen if Malaria can evolve to infect mosquitos that have already been made immune? Another good question, if something like that happen, then I’m sure Malaria can already by-pass human vacine. So, no worries here.
@prabhatsourya38833 жыл бұрын
As to question 2, the possibility of mutation and super bug creation is the reason why "oil - eating bacteria" (which would absorb and assimilate crude oil from the sea surface spills) was not commercialized, as scientists feared that it would mutate or mix with local bacteria and could cause catastrophic results on the ecosystem.
@thevinedenedo81996 жыл бұрын
I am from Nigeria, I surfer malaria infection at least twice each year, it's horrible. Science has once again proven to be a positive force for good if left in the hand of rational thinkers.
@Reqex6 жыл бұрын
What kind of effect might wiping a kind of mosquitoes have on the food chain? While I agree that we should work on this ASAP to save lives, but killing off all the mosquitoes sounds very dangerous... I think I agree more with virus resistant mosquitoes instead.
@fangirlfortheages59406 жыл бұрын
Enoch Tong I agree I’m surprised that wasn’t more of the environmentalist’s argument and it wasn’t touched on here
@insertchannelnamehere86853 жыл бұрын
Generally they do this with only one species of mosquito at a time, and while they might go extinct, there's literally hundreds of other ( perhaps non disease transmitting) other species that can take over their niche in the food chain, so the overall environmental effect isn't that bad
@TheYinfaowei6 жыл бұрын
This is one of my best vox episodes ever!!! you guys rock
@marekvrbka6 жыл бұрын
This could be problematic. By essentially wiping out mosquitoes, you are affecting their predators... which affects their predators... This could be devastating. Albeit the resistance to malaria transmiting could work.
@ConfusedPorpoise6 жыл бұрын
So far ecological work has been done and they have found that mosquitos have little role as prey. But they do have a role as a vector for diseases in the ecosystem. The issue is that these diseases kill us too. And yeah, it's also hard to know all the unintended consequences, but they are using the science they have right now to make this judgement.
@starandfox6016 жыл бұрын
Mosquitos can cause migartions and effect migartion patterns.for example migrating birds will go to areas where the misquito population has exploded to get a quick fuel up of food. herbivores also will travel a cretain way to blow away mosquitoes and their biting also can cause herbivores to migrate to try and get away from them. So mosquitoes do play a huge role in the ecosystem. Also bioligist once thought wolves were useless and thanks to them yellow stones ecosystem collapsed.
@cpwm176 жыл бұрын
They only target mosquito species that transfer malaria.
@vegetaprinceofdrip6636 жыл бұрын
this is only the species that carries malaria, plenty other species present
@yayjuiws42246 жыл бұрын
There's a lot of species of mosquitos, so one danger out of the list, won't do anything significantly harmful.
@CAROLOC6 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have a degree in Molecular Biology and Genetics and during my studies I often read about this topic. I personally agree with a responsible use of genetic drive, but in the scientific community (for what I know at least) there is a big debate regarding their use. The major concern is that no such thing with a spreading capability of a genetic drive exist in nature so we don’t have any clue of how it will evolve even in the short term, for example it could inactivate itself by random mutation, or it could spread to other species where it could have a completely different effect (we know that the horizontal gene transfer could be more common than expected, we saw it happening in the wild fruit fly in the matter of years). I totally agree with its use, we are talking about saving lives. But I am afraid that it will take a lot of time before its use. However I am not specialising in this field so my point of view could be a little dated.
@ihsanayyasy60366 жыл бұрын
Joss Fong!! :)
@taquitolayton686 жыл бұрын
She's cute, isn't she?
@joemama321006 жыл бұрын
UkeSama she's a total babe haha
@abramjessiah6 жыл бұрын
Yes, I too have noticed. 😘
@japhetawa23894 жыл бұрын
yum yum
@cheddarcheese089 Жыл бұрын
Time for an update to this video.
@fanaticalzealot12466 жыл бұрын
I don’t think we should make the mosquitoes infertile, that would drastically effect wildlife populations, I think the best option is to make mosquitoes anti parasitic.
@mogur006 жыл бұрын
the verb is AFFECT (unless you're saying "effect change" for eg.), and is basically synonymous with INFLUENCE (the verb). Eg. "making mosquitoes infertile would drastically affect wildlife populations" The noun is generally EFFECT, eg. "the effect of making mosquitoes infertile would be ..." FYI
@wangdangdoodle49446 жыл бұрын
mogur00 words be nimble words be quick words resemble walking Sti Ks. I touched her thigh and death smiled. I'll never wake up in a good mood again. Was it the??
@jascrandom98556 жыл бұрын
Absolute horseshit. Mosquitoes are hardly a source of food for any creature in nature. They won't be missed by anyone.
@raquelflorence2356 жыл бұрын
Jasc Random Some really small birds eat mosquitos. Mosquito larvae is food for many small fish.
@meowmeow55916 жыл бұрын
"Drastcially effect wildlife populations" what ones? Where? What animals? You have no idea, but thought to comment because you assume you know better than the scientists working on this. Even just a quick Google search shows you the impact (or lack of) this mosquito has to other animals and plants, and that it's human disease and overpopulation that caused the overpopulation of said mosquitos, they're nearly correcting for this
@piccolo9173 жыл бұрын
This is why you should fund biomedical scientists with as much money as they ask for.
@zoreh42796 жыл бұрын
Bye everyone I have to go to school now
@griffdog82336 жыл бұрын
Sharpie Man Cya mate
@Udontkno76 жыл бұрын
have fun kid
@panicatdx6 жыл бұрын
Sharpie Man what are you doing at school at 2pm on a bank holiday?
@noweeeee6 жыл бұрын
Sharpie Man goodluck
@amiyarose91406 жыл бұрын
Sharpie Man Do good! :)
@Dalerz246 жыл бұрын
BRILLIANT! Excellent job distilling advanced science and its importance into an easy to understand and entertaining video! Must have taken an incredible amount of thought and work.
@PirateTHESteam16 жыл бұрын
Can we also do this to ticks while we're at it?
@DavidAllen-px7gr6 жыл бұрын
Probably. It'll take just as much time as tweaking mosquitoes will take in total, but it's still feasible.
@aidanrozema85226 жыл бұрын
YOU RELEASED THIS 2 DAYS AFTER MY SCIENCE PROJECT ON MALARIA! GAH! AND I COULD OF USED YOU GUYS AS A SOURCE!!!!
@ilikemeandvidios6 жыл бұрын
I think giving the mosquitoes the ability to not give the virus to people is the best idea lowering the population will hurt the environment and we will feel the effects later on in these countries which have people depend on the environment for their livelihood
@Silverizael6 жыл бұрын
There are hundreds of species of mosquito in the regions. This is only dealing with a single species that transmits malaria.
@cutelovegigi5 жыл бұрын
It is not that we don't want to help people, the issue is that the Gene Drive is such a new method that we are still learning about. Just a year ago scientists started testing a gene drive with mice and they have already seen that after 5 generation the gene drive had been turned off, in other words, in mammals it had already presented mutations. I am not against using gene drives but also I don't think we should jump right in to trying this technology yet, especially with children. As a biology major and someone who is interest in genetics, I just ask from current scientists to do more trials and make sure how to use this technology before using it.
@Sivah_Akash6 жыл бұрын
We can't just look at the harm nature does to us. It's nothing compared to how Nature actually helps us, and the reason we're alive at all. Anyways the harm is just Nature's way to keep sustaining species for as long as possible, whether we like it or not. But as a Species, we are indeed trying to survive better, as an instinct!
@PincheBrayan1016 жыл бұрын
I’m all for getting rid of mosquitoes but you have to be careful with eliminating mosquitoes just because some animals rely on mosquitoes for food. Altering mosquitoes I’m all for.
@DankMatter6 жыл бұрын
I mean if these mosquitos got released into the world, people will still shoo them away
@charlieshin98686 жыл бұрын
yh but the point of this is to make it so that these mosquitoes repopulate so basically in a few years time there will be zero mosquitoes that can pass malaria
@meowmeow55916 жыл бұрын
With such an ignorant comment, I'm gonna bet (and really hope) you're trolling.
@DankMatter6 жыл бұрын
meow meow non't
@AL-hk3oo6 жыл бұрын
Hello catn't
@BlobsoR0ck6 жыл бұрын
True
@endo99026 жыл бұрын
This is the kind of "news" that makes me glad to live now and in this planet.
@SciencewithKatie6 жыл бұрын
This is so cool! 💛💛
@3p1cand3rs0n6 жыл бұрын
Jeeze, nobody likes us today. At least we tried. 😕
@fatbadboy3296 жыл бұрын
Oh, hi Katie
@jackdavis42406 жыл бұрын
I use Vox to do news summaries so thanks for existing
@charlieshin98686 жыл бұрын
Check out kurzegasagt for better info on this subject
@samuelluisdelespiritusanto73436 жыл бұрын
That video is old
@unvergebeneid6 жыл бұрын
I don't think I'd agree that it's better. Also, it's spelled "kurzgesagt."
@meowmeow55916 жыл бұрын
Penny Lane ....chill mate, we know you went and searched for it to get the right spelling, and if the point was grammar he could've just searched as well, but we all inferred the right meaning ergo no need for the smart ass grammar checks.
@unvergebeneid6 жыл бұрын
I didn't have to but the broader point would be that if you recommend something to other people, you should maybe go through the trouble of googling the correct spelling yourself.
@TheRockerX6 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@aliyahamiri73906 жыл бұрын
I can’t help but get excited when watching this video. What an amazing breakthrough! ☺️
@BR-jt6ny6 жыл бұрын
Just saying that nature is a horror show is pretty dismissive. Every time I hear about these genetically modified mosquitoes I can't help wondering whether drastically reducing mosquito populations won't have bad consequences for the local ecosystems.
@Hicham-zl4iu4 жыл бұрын
It's because of the pharmaceutical business. I recommand strongly watching Malaria Business Documentary to see, that these millions are dying because of the greedy Pharma industry. And read about ARTEMISIA ANNUA plant, which is very effective for Malaria but unfortunately not allowed in many countries because of the lobby's and the WHO.
@florence91336 жыл бұрын
Aloha, fellow Vox fans!
@rewer6 жыл бұрын
Flo Butcher, aloha
@florence91336 жыл бұрын
rewer Bonjour from England :)
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
Bonjourno from England!
@TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын
Oh haha, just saw that you wrote pretty much the EXACT same thing! Bonjour is apparently an English thing now aha!
@florence91336 жыл бұрын
Aspect Science that's gotta be it! 😁
@Nerrvih6 жыл бұрын
Bad argument at the end. She did not say "we should leave malaria alone", she said "not like this". The gene drive tool is terrifying and should be treated as such.
@tylerbritton386 жыл бұрын
One accedentiy escapes lab
@ShankarSivarajan6 жыл бұрын
Tyler Britton "accidentally" saving millions of lives, despite not being approved by the government.
@another.nikhil6 жыл бұрын
Vox has the best videos on youtube.
@aniekanumoren60886 жыл бұрын
Vox science vids >>>>>> vox Political vids
@aniekanumoren60886 жыл бұрын
Sadly the climate change denial on the right is attrorious, but the denial of biological differences between men and women on the left is also madenning.
@CutieZalbu6 жыл бұрын
Aniekan Umoren LoL man & women are different biologically but the right uses that same differences to oppress women😂
@silvervixen0076 жыл бұрын
Because you disagree?
@nokiabladee6 жыл бұрын
true xd
@leifharmsen6 жыл бұрын
If all mosquitoes went extinct I don't think anyone would cry.
@moskva-kassiopeya6 жыл бұрын
U do no da wae
@frenchfrythecool6 жыл бұрын
Joss, your videos are always excellent. I know I can always count on you to bring interesting stories to this platform with integrity and sound research
@Sam-ip6co6 жыл бұрын
So its okay to intentionally push a entire species to extinction now
@nesslig20255 жыл бұрын
We have done that before in terms of things that are sources of major human (and sometimes animal) suffering and I hope morons like you won't stop us from doing that. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eradication_of_infectious_diseases
@TyKOmain6 жыл бұрын
Nice I remember when Vice covered this like a year ago when the Zika outbreak was big....
@shahnawazansari1196 жыл бұрын
u r late.. kurzgegast did it first
@one8ty.9186 жыл бұрын
Shahnawaz Ansari *kurzgesagt
@ByNextus6 жыл бұрын
That video is hella old. This one is an "updated version" of that!
@jeyanthiprabhu13386 жыл бұрын
ONE8TY. Yea kurzgesagt is so hard to spell
@Katzelle36 жыл бұрын
Kurzgegast war die Lebenserwartung einer Gruppe von Personen in den vierziger Jahren.
@aditawks6 жыл бұрын
Awesome Video Vox Team.
@cucaulwell12876 жыл бұрын
As a general rule I'm wary of Genetic Modification... but so long as they test it super rigorously and then get a really pessimistic person to think of all the negative outcomes and ensure those don't happen... sure, I guess. It sounds good in theory, anyway.
@NessieAndrew6 жыл бұрын
Old story. Yet, I still like how it's presented.
@MrJhuang9996 жыл бұрын
I'd be happy to hear Joss read stories for dayz. Are there gene modification risks? Food chain?
@3roderick36 жыл бұрын
The big dilemma with the concept of the gene drive is that effects will be uncontrollable once implemented. Instead of modifying one organism whose genes may or may not survive due to evolution (which warrants discussion in its own right), you are now rigging/ bypassing part of the evolutionary process. We should do this with extreme caution and a lot of ethical discussions. Science discovers the methods, but can not give answers to ethical dilemma's. Just to clarify, I am a scientist working with CRISPR Cas9 in an unrelated field. And I find the genedrive concept both fascinating and alarming at the same time.
@JarrodBaniqued6 жыл бұрын
I like Friends of the Earth and am okay with GMO labeling, but genetic engineering is one of the best ways forward to letting humanity survive and overcome disease and slow aging.
@bvthebalkananarchistmapper56426 жыл бұрын
I didn't even start watching the video, and I already know what's it about. THANKS KURZGESAGT, FOR MAKING A VIDEO ABOUT THE SAME THING MORE THAN A YEAR AGO!
@bvthebalkananarchistmapper56426 жыл бұрын
I prefer the Californian method, thank you very much.
@bvthebalkananarchistmapper56426 жыл бұрын
F*** you anti-Genetic-modification groups!
@nara0dhipa6 жыл бұрын
joss' voice is heaven
@colettebatman67716 жыл бұрын
It’s scary to me to consider the fact that this title could easily be the opposite...there is so much that the DOD does and all other agencies do without transparency...
@acanthus346 жыл бұрын
There is a scientifically modified mosquitoes that are released in the Philippines that breeds mosquitoes that doesn't have wings. I think their take on it is simple and effective.
@ChronicallyCurious6 жыл бұрын
As someone who's been ill since I was 12, and has been told by various specialists I'm not expected to ever get better, I cordially and strongly dislike the idea that we don't need to do research because it's messing with nature. Those people need to try living without antibiotics and vaccines for a while. If they lived through what I, what my family, goes through, I don't think they'd have the luxury of retaining those scruples. Yes, I am worried at the negative aspects of any new breakthrough. There will be a period of transition. But... it is the only hope of so many people will illnesses out there, either ones that will kill them before we can develop this technology, that will keep them suffering longer, that will destroy their lives but allow them to retain them, or be passed on to their children so they can suffer as well. Mother Nature has supplied us with various means to fight infection and ward off pain, but it also supplies all the things necessary to supply it. We have the ability, we can do this. I don't know how people can realize how many suffering people will be aided by advances in this kind of tech and just say, "Nope. Not worth it." I understand many people may think differently, but that's my hard-won opinion.
@PepTwo6 жыл бұрын
i really love their editing stlye
@aidanwansbrough74956 жыл бұрын
This is really cool that we are able to do this - though I think we should indeed be careful. What I don't get is why we are still focusing on annihilating mosquitoes, rather than making them malaria-resistant.
@Vox6 жыл бұрын
the argument against targeting the parasites rather than the mosquitoes is that malaria parasites have already shown that they can evolve resistance to insecticides and drugs and could quickly evolve around this too. That doesn't mean it wouldn't work, but it could require repeatedly re-engineering the drive. I think they'll test both approaches and see which has the most likelihood of impacting the disease.
@aidanwansbrough74956 жыл бұрын
Makes sense - thank you!!!! :)
@OmikronPsy6 жыл бұрын
6:12 "There are no regulations that have handled this before" The reason is: There are many regulations how to deal with genetically modified organism in most countries. For example in Germany: It is strictly VERBOTEN to release them into the environment.
@feyfrost87835 жыл бұрын
This disease has been prominent in it's native habitat for eons, removing it could cause untold disaster to local ecosystems and relationships we do not understand.
@shrekt10005 жыл бұрын
Valentino, there's an Anopheles mosquito behind you! Oh no he has airpods in, he can't hear us.
@lxndrskv6 жыл бұрын
Mosquito undergoes mutation, allows gene drive of unwanted genes. For instance, resistance to pesticides, faster reproduction, and/or carrier of a stronger disease. Theoretical, yes. But a concern regardless.
@freewillftw6 жыл бұрын
I just love this channel, videos are well made and the presenter is beautiful.
@Holobrine6 жыл бұрын
The question of editing human DNA is increasingly whether we should and less whether we could.
@SakuraStallion6 жыл бұрын
What about the animals that eat those mosquitos? Will the shrinking of their population affect the ecosystem? If it makes a drastic change will it be worth the fewer cases of malaria?
@aidan28576 жыл бұрын
I believe it is extremely better to get rid of mosquitoes rather than parasite resistance because no mosquitoes are better then harmless mosquitoes
@Jferrs5 жыл бұрын
Making mosquitos infertile would be a terrible idea for conservation... Many animals eat mosquitos.
@paradox...6 жыл бұрын
Joss is back!
@redsauce91356 жыл бұрын
Simply adding the Vox logo to a thumbnail is clickbait, since every Vox video is damn interesting
@connorfitz-d68526 жыл бұрын
What an incredible video. Well balanced and informative
@craigterris18026 жыл бұрын
I mean, the people calling for a moratorium on gene drive research kind of have a point, using this technology to wipe out things like agricultural pests could have some serious unforeseen consequences, but wiping out malaria is such a net good that i think it's still worth doing.
@ampPLrant6 жыл бұрын
My biggest concern is killing off mosquito populations is how it would affect other populations like fish and bats. I personally would be in favor of the resistance approach in which mosquitoes are made into bad hosts for malaria, but I am pretty strongly against the population reduction approach. It seems like it has a much larger chance of secondary effects.
@milanfilipovic36483 жыл бұрын
Found this video after learning about the Oxitec experiment in the Florida Keys. Really interesting!
@Jib-Jab-4-life6 жыл бұрын
This is a dangerous misrepresentation of gene drive technology. First, the CRISPR system is not at all as accurate as sensational journalists like to make it out to be, sometimes resulting in deletions around the desired sequence. Second, gene drives are not self-contained, as a natural part of chromosomal inheritance is recombination. This means that from one generation to the next, different genes may end up in the drive package. The most significant argument against gene drives, however, is their irreversibility. Many research programs have been launched to study potential mitigation of "undesired" uses of gene drive technology, and the best thing they've publicly disclosed to have come up with was to release another gene drive that outcompetes the first. In complex systems such as ecosystems, it can be nearly impossible to predict the consequences of an action. In releasing these technologies without knowing /all/ of the variables, we're queued up for a race to the bottom.
@HumbleMemeFarmer6 жыл бұрын
Nice! This is what humans should be about, using science to help the people AND the earth. I support this 100 percent.
@nashanderson72096 жыл бұрын
It's amazing to see countries, organizations, and continents of the world, rich and poor, black white asian cocasion all join together despite differences, to fight a disease. It shows that there are still many people who don't care whom you are, but believe we are all equal.
@khalidsparrow1016 жыл бұрын
Hopefully this works. Please save millions of people.
@AdamvanNoort6 жыл бұрын
Wow Vox on Netflix is just perfect!
@GlynisDance Жыл бұрын
Excellent video.
@sbellaharris6 жыл бұрын
No Joss comment? Wow. Audience improved.
@mogur006 жыл бұрын
look harder
@sushio43576 жыл бұрын
Joss Fong explains so well
@tana0915 жыл бұрын
This is not responsible or thorough journalism. There has been substantial research done into the agribusiness interests behind gene drives, which have not been mentioned at all here. Neither has the issue of ethics and consent which have been a major point of contention at the Convention on Biological Diversity where gene drives have been discussed. As well, the largest funder of gene drives is the US military, as was revealed in the Gene Drive Files. Why has none of this been mentioned in this piece? The piece gives most time and space to all those working on gene drives and promoting them (except for one interview).
@PraxeoIogy6 жыл бұрын
A gene drive for infertility would be a concerning precedent to establish as a solution to any problem whatsoever. Parasite resistance should be the obvious way to go, but there will be a lot of vested interests to go the other route to establish the precedence for other reasons. The complexity of nature is greatly underestimated, and the stacking of dependencies of an ecosystem means that if keep removing elements of that ecosystem it will eventually collapse. No problem with genetic modification, we've done it as humans for thousands of years through gene selection. But to select genes FOR infertility should raise alarms bells as a first principle. As Elton John said, "Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids, in fact it's cold as hell, And there's no one there to raise them if you did". By the way, big SpaceX fan but Mars is just a stepping stone to bigger and better planets! It is still cheaper to maintain and even restore the earth's ecosystems at the moment! Subpar planets are light years away! 1 light year would take at least 20,000 years to travel! That's a harsh reality so the longer we can delay extinction the better. CRISPR for parasite resistance > CRISPR for infertility!
@thrumugnyr6 жыл бұрын
I feel the mosquitos that are gene driven to not be malaria carriers is a much more beautiful solution compared to the infertile ones. I feel like if mosquitos just largely disappear, it might have a big impact on biodiversity, too (considering how many other animals eat insects). With the first solution, they'd still be around an annoying, but not deadly. Which would be nice.