Ok so not only does this guy help me pass my ap biology and calculus tests, but HE CAN HELP ME WITH COLLEGE ECONOMICS NOW???? WHAT A GOD!
@dustinharford84545 жыл бұрын
Ate my dinner to this instead of reading the textbook; the result? 70% on the midterm! Your handwriting is wonderful by the way. Thanks a million!
@boraulu89004 жыл бұрын
tomorrow i have a macroeconomics exam and now i'm exactly doing what you have done 1 year ago. i hope i will get a result as high as yours. khan academy never gets old!!!
@oceditz7850 Жыл бұрын
@@boraulu8900 tomorrow I have business economics exam me too done exactly the same thing which you two had done years ago... Wish me luck P.S: I'm not very good at studies even so wish me luck to atleast pass my exam 🤞
@musak.4068 Жыл бұрын
@@boraulu8900 how's life
@boraulu8900 Жыл бұрын
@@musak.4068 i have done very well in the exam. Wish you all the best guys. Thank you very much! Khan Academy never gets old!!!
@musak.4068 Жыл бұрын
@@boraulu8900 Great! I took a break from trading after a big loss and have been studying khan academy for the past several months.
@Charl30117 жыл бұрын
If you're my lecturer I would have gone to lecture every single day
@nthperson9 жыл бұрын
The problem with this presentation is that GDP is not really a measurement of economic growth, only the amount being spent by all players in an economy. This includes all government spending, whether the revenue is raised via taxation, via borrowing in the credit markets or by monetary expansion orchestrated by the central bank. The most important externality is not "human emotion." Rather, the most important variable is systemic: the structure of property law and taxation that (as explained by Joseph Stiglitz) triggers "rent-seeking" (e.g., land and resource speculation) over the production of goods and delivery of value-adding services. A much more insightful explanation of business cycles is provided in the March 2015 issue of the American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Papers by Professors Fred Foldvary (San Jose State) and Mason Gaffney (emeritus, University of California) are of particular value because these two professors accurately forecasted the 2008 financial and economic crisis.
@tatetalk8889 жыл бұрын
When your teacher cant teach 4 sh-t so you gotta watch this..... Mr.H
@2007Club5 жыл бұрын
L.A. boy98 HAHAHAHhahahaha😭😭😭😭
@TOMMYGUN102312 жыл бұрын
You are a great teacher and have brought my attention back to want to learn. I have ADD so I can't focus on a book but you make it easy with the videos. I wish they had this when I went to school. lol
@mohemmedansari86643 жыл бұрын
:-) when your neighbor looses his job is recession, and when you loose, its depression. I like humor even in serious lesson.
@wardamalik93415 жыл бұрын
Best explanation on every topic....Thank u soo much
@MrArkiholic9 жыл бұрын
this is awesome!! really helpful and easy to understand.. great presentation!!
@emahenecia46609 жыл бұрын
Finally something went inside my head( I got it at last)
@pvpchampion90049 ай бұрын
Tysm :)
@LCB_Instituto5 жыл бұрын
Yup, seven years later, still great. Thanks!
@economicsportal5 жыл бұрын
Nice way to deliver the concept. Keep it up
@amiraboodi20758 ай бұрын
Very interesting ❤
@jakobthekid6 жыл бұрын
Where does AD and AS come into play?
@economicsportal5 жыл бұрын
good effort
@udeshmerfi99252 жыл бұрын
Thank a lot ❤
@jamie_gz5 жыл бұрын
The way you explained the business cycle is much more interesting and practical than my professor! COOL!
@jessieprado67789 жыл бұрын
great vid helped me out lots for my test!!!
@annika42098 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for the video! Can anyone recommend papers or textbooks to read up on the influence of human emotions on the business cycles?
@jordangauthier26746 жыл бұрын
Human emotion really only lengthens or shortens the different periods of the "cycle." Emotion may influence the longevity of the period preceding the boom, during the boom, during the bust, and following the bust. It can fuel higher highs and lower lows in the prices of assets, but it is not the cause of the boom-bust cycle (aka the Business Cycle or Trade Cycle), and not the only factor influencing each period's length. Bubbles are an effect of the cause of business cycles, and are perhaps the most visible, observable effect. Unfortunately, I do not have any papers or textbooks on the influence of human emotions on the business cycles as from the vantage point of the Austrian School of Economics, emotion plays a minor role and again is an effect not a cause of the cycle. However, behavioral economics is attempting to apply psychology and sociology to economics in order to go beyond the stationary economy that Keynesian theory and mathematical formulas can only describe (at least cleanly), so you could look there. However, I advocate for the sound theory developed by the Austrian School (Mises and Hayek); though, you may be disappointed to find that the theory discounts human emotions as they are not the, or a, primary cause.
@jazouliabdelmoughit77657 жыл бұрын
Good explanation, although it is not the only one. there are few other theories of business cycles that are worthy of interest. I would like to see an explanation of the Austrian theory, Monetary or even Marxist..
@Tyrant_1312 жыл бұрын
Has Sal ever given his opinion of Austrian economics?
@iantobrewer38964 жыл бұрын
brilliantly explained
@omgiheartpie12 жыл бұрын
Salman Khan was a hedge fund analyst. I'd venture to say what you perceive to be his economic philosophy is something he has arrived to logically and can authoritatively back up.
@zakirhasanbora90445 жыл бұрын
This was really really good In fact, the factor of human emotions actually made the concept easier
@lungdupak59785 жыл бұрын
Real business cycle please
@instaminox5 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation
@domagojgrcevic60555 жыл бұрын
What acctually causes points of return? When we are in a recession, how does acctually expansion start and vice verca? Good vid, thanks ahead!!
@nthperson11 жыл бұрын
As I am sure you are aware, there is even among economists great concern over the reliance on GDP as a measurement of real economic growth. And, more to the point, GDP growth tells us nothing about changes in the distribution of income or wealth in a society, or other factors that contribute to a stable society.
@kiranamutiarakusakanusa30543 жыл бұрын
Thanl you thank you thank youuuuu
@Amphibianman9412 жыл бұрын
FiatTubing, you shouldn't downgrade Sal's credibility. From this video alone I can say that he would probably be very interested in the works of Mises, Hayek, Friedman, etc. The Austrian economists offer a lot to the study, and there's nothing more satisfying than a "new" knowledge on old problems. Mr. Khan, I would surely like to recommend any of the major works by the three economists/thinkers mentioned above.
@chueyadanarlinn67964 жыл бұрын
Hope you are my eco teacher :')
@Countcho12 жыл бұрын
Human emotions? But isn't the "human emotions" (to some degree) influenced by the interest rates (which can be manipulated by the central bank) on indicators of whether to make investments or not?
@aliosama9367 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@theSpicyHam12 жыл бұрын
Very helpful
@mitchellboldin947210 жыл бұрын
Real GDP is actually going to increase exponentially over time. However, economists often graph the natural log of GDP, which is indeed a straight line as you have graphed. But you may want to make that clear in the video.
@manishasinha14584 жыл бұрын
I have a question regarding real business cycle. HOW CAN YOU EXPLAIN THEORITICALLY DIFFERENT PART OF BUISNESS CYCLE USING A CLASSICAL MODEL? Could you please explain this?
@EraserFS9 жыл бұрын
One can argue that these "emotions" or "animal spirits" (as Keynes called the same, just to point out which economic school is taught on this channel) are simply the result of a centralized economy. Or to be more specific that centrally set incentives for all economic agents result into aggregate motion in the same direction (either towards expansion or contraction), if these centrally set incentives are successful to some degree. This is because in principle the bankruptcy of particular economic agent is the opportunity of a more efficient other agent, because the more efficient is enabled to acquire liquidated resources and / or market shares of the bankrupt agent. From a theoretical standpoint these motions into a different direction cancel each other out, so from the aggregate perspective, the whole problem is that this mechanism doesnt work there resulting into an aggregate motion in one direction, which one can call forced expansion.
@Doodsome12 жыл бұрын
Respect. Now if you could apply all the theory you're giving to the current economic situation and make it more relevant, you'll get an explosion with the amount of subscribers. Ppl need to know these thing to realize what is happening right now.
@blazemk12 жыл бұрын
yes you are completely right. What is said in this video is wrong. "A recession is a period of 2 consequtive quarters of negative growth." A depression on the other hand is just like a recession but much more severe . Like the great depression of 1929. The recession of 2008-2010 can also be called a depresion because of the severity of it.
@vanskiid12 жыл бұрын
@khanacademy could you give advice to a college kid on how to work at a hedge fund?
@tiki218811 жыл бұрын
These are great, you explain econ well and are quite fair. Very non ideological. Glad you did mention human emotions (human action??) because an economy is not really a thing, but just us, all of us. There is history, stats, graphs and charts and they DO help but can't view economics as purely mathematical. Khan Academy are you ever gunna touch on the Austrian School? I know its controversial and even ridiculed but since the late 80s I think they have some relevancy
@bombito886312 жыл бұрын
thanks bro
@nthperson11 жыл бұрын
Are you familiar with the Genuine Progress Indicator developed by Redefining Progress? Although far from perfect, the GPI is a much more useful tool for evaluation of public policy choices. Even if one is focused just on economic growth I would rather rely on net growth in the stock of capital goods.
@martinverbeek88628 жыл бұрын
Fed fund rate/inter bank lending rate cycles corolates almost perfect and is obviously the reason for the business cycle
@carlosortegap8 жыл бұрын
What about the rest of the world? They have economies too
@creeper52enderman7 жыл бұрын
Fed rates have made recessions more common, they aren't the driving force behind the business cycle though.
@martinverbeek88627 жыл бұрын
Carlos. 62% of global assets are US dollar mate
@xcvsdxvsx12 жыл бұрын
i hope emotion is codewords for central bank interest rate manipulation.
@seller647810 жыл бұрын
THANKYOU SO MUCH
@247troller12 жыл бұрын
Trough > expansion > peak > contraction
@liyuehashbrowns60556 жыл бұрын
8:45 Life really is a roller coaster
@LaShakaa12 жыл бұрын
very well explained. thanks :)
@philliphlavac9 жыл бұрын
What program are you using to write and draw with on your computer?
@jessnz9 жыл бұрын
+Phillip Hlavac A bit late but it is Smoothdraw
@fpromothraj3 жыл бұрын
Can a industry cycle go from Decline to growth stage? if so are there any examples of such industry.
@johnw701810 жыл бұрын
This is good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@rohanchandra96472 жыл бұрын
woah 10 yearsss
@jernellelouis343210 жыл бұрын
Best explanation ever!!!
@VickiBee11 жыл бұрын
My friend, the one I used to try to impress, likes Paul Krugman and Bernie Sanders. He has no problem saying so. But he also likes Bill Gates in terms of business people.
@carlosortegap8 жыл бұрын
How is that a contradiction?
@exkalina8 жыл бұрын
can someone explain pls what is the difference between business cycles, economic cycles and financial cycles?
@nthperson11 жыл бұрын
The real point of constructing the GPI was (and is) to bring to light the shortcomings of measurements long embraced by the economics profession. Similar quality of life measurements have crept their way into the research and writings of environmental economists. The problem is mainstream models is that they arbitrarily treat nature as a produced (i.e., capital) good, rather than the source of goods, capital and consumer.
@CRoy-qu7ib2 жыл бұрын
capital is the source of capital.
@nthperson2 жыл бұрын
@@CRoy-qu7ib I disagree. Labor, applied to natural resources, is the source of capital (if, by capital, one is referring to tangible goods). The dynamics are confused by using the term "capital" to refer to nontangible financial assets, which are claims on capital goods and on other tangible assets, such as land and natural resources. Nonfinancial assets are also exchanged for other nonfinancial assets.
@emahenecia46609 жыл бұрын
Is there any solution for recession?
@blownspeakersss9 жыл бұрын
Ema Henecia During recessions, the general goal is to increase aggregate demand. So, usually you see a cut in taxes, which leaves consumers with more disposable income (useable money), or an increase in governmental spending (this pushes more money through the economy as well, driving aggregate demand upward). The central bank can take several measures as well that don't require political action.
@EraserFS9 жыл бұрын
+Ema Henecia One can argue that recessions are the solution to a previous problem. Clusters of malinvestments that need to be liquidated in order to make effective use of the means of production possible again. The preferred solution is to put more money into people hands in order to shorten the period of time in which this "solution" can unfold. Thus we see phenomena that the public calls "too big to fail" or "excessive risk taking". Its the perfect but unwanted result from the preferred solution.
@BrokTheLoneWolf7 жыл бұрын
Ema Henecia all breathing needs a breathing out aspect.
@jordangauthier26746 жыл бұрын
Simply, don't manipulate the money supply, especially in the form of fiduciary media
@MrPheeww2 жыл бұрын
Day trading is not 'working' ?
@WangYangX11 жыл бұрын
It looks like a relationship.
@nthperson11 жыл бұрын
Let's begin with the very use of GDP as a measurement. Is it a measurement of the health of the economy? Well, not really, because GDP increases with every dollar spent by government at all levels -- whether the revenue is acquired via taxation, by actual borrowing from others in credit markets or by issuance of debt in exchange for currency balances created by the Fed out of thin air. (more to follow)
@bunnyflavored746211 жыл бұрын
KHANN!!!! KHANNN!!!
@damiaxxx12 жыл бұрын
The Austrian economists explain the business cycle much more completely.
@rickyssidekick55353 жыл бұрын
....omg, his voice tho ///0.0///
@himanshusingh-er7dd3 жыл бұрын
Emotionics or economics
@blazemk12 жыл бұрын
A depression is a more severe recession. But recession is still 2 consequtive quarters of negative growth therefore the term recession in the video is wrong. It should be called a slowdown or a contraction. Source of my information is "Essentials of Economics by John Sloman"
@Profmak787 жыл бұрын
As someone who teaches aspects of economic theory to college students, I find this lesson very distressing. It strongly suggests that emotion is the primary driver of investment decisions. This is deeply misleading, and it obscures key drivers of the business cycle, especially the effect of the upward the distribution of profits. It has been well-understood for at least a century that the pooling of profits undercuts aggregate demand (we can call this the paradox of thrift, or whatever). Even Henry Ford clearly understood this. Emotions cannot account for the business cycle.
@hadezmage7 жыл бұрын
Well, you are entitled to your opinion, as is Khan Academy and its representatives. For the most part, these series of videos are designed to be watched in succession -- the instructor has repeatedly said before, after, and in this video, that he is an avid supporter of human emotion as a defining factor. And this is all theory, opinion, he always says, "I think.." or "I believe..." or something along those lines. A lot of the people watching this video, students, know that economics is wholeheartedly made up of complex theories based off of simplified observations. Most people here are just to gain information to pass classes, and will quickly forget the majority of information they learned after the fact. On a side note, I'll have to side with this video's opinion that emotion is a factor and very much does account for the business cycle, as someone who had studied sociology, psychology, and the alike, though I do not have enough information to say whether or not it is the primary, main, or strongest one. Of course, traditional ideas and theories conveyed though conventional methods such as textbooks, unless modernized, will never be able to accurately portray a changing society, as it tends to forget that economy is not alone, there is a domino effect that includes politics and society, in regard to economics. (The former two which are highly fueled by strong human emotion, almost irrefutable, I'd say.) Humans can act sporadically, and no economic statistic or theory can account for human behavior, (if so, a minute percentage) but human behavior and emotion can definitely play into economics, because emotions for the most part fuel behavior, and behavior one of the core essences of any society, in regards to politics, societal aspects, and the economy.
@vincentgrayjr.9027 жыл бұрын
Michael is correct. The fundamentals of economics rely on the statement that individuals make rational decisions with their money. Although, the study of economics does always have the saying, "On the other hand."
@lcastill20137 жыл бұрын
He's repeated on several occasions that this is an OVERSIMPLIFIED version of the business cycle. Start your own channel if you can explain the business cycle better in 8 minutes. :)
@jordangauthier26746 жыл бұрын
F.A. Hayek has addressed the Paradox of Saving or Thrift in his 1929 article titled, "The 'Paradox' of Savings" (mises.org/library/paradox-saving). Investor psychology, or human emotion, plays a role in the lengthening or contracting of the different periods of the boom-bust cycle. Time preferences of individuals may influence the general increase in prices, but the main cause of the boom-bust cycle, today, in the USA, is the manipulation of the money supply by the Federal Reserve Banking System. The rest of the observed effects are consequences of this manipulation. Empirical analysis has a hard time determining this from the data due to the tremendous amount of variables changing at all times and interfering with each other. Praxeology is a better methodology for determining the causes and their effects.
@jordangauthier26746 жыл бұрын
I do agree, however, that emotion is not a key driver of the boom-bust cycle. It is not a key driver, but an effect of the cause. This is a Keynesian take on the business cycle, but good luck using it to forecast the next business cycle.
@stronghold10a12 жыл бұрын
call it emotion khan....
@kabirmughal42347 жыл бұрын
what the hell with these our Department Teachers... they didn't really knows the method of teaching... Thank you for the Video...
@ashachoc11 жыл бұрын
Can't emotions be both the cause and effect of the business cycle?
@annalynsawayan95948 жыл бұрын
can u help me guiz... i have an assignment about HICKS. in subject mark1 need to explain with the suplorted documents...
@HunterParkermusic10 жыл бұрын
I'm just watching some of these videos for a review for my macro final, so I already have a bit of knowledge of this stuff. So I heard him talk about human emotions and how that isn't taken into account in the GDP models, and I just thought, "Yes!! He's against Keynesianism just as much as I am!!"
@mitchellboldin947210 жыл бұрын
The Keynesians don't just care about GDP, and there is a rich literature out there about how GDP fails to account for everything.
@jklal83744 жыл бұрын
"when you lose your job, its depression" lol
@garretlizotte62882 жыл бұрын
"We see this trend every ten years or so"... Prophetic?
@nthperson11 жыл бұрын
There is no real business cycle. Booms-to-busts occur every 18-20 years linked to property markets. And, these markets are driven by speculation in land; which, in turn, is exacerbated by easy and cheap credit -- and, most importantly, the very low effective rate of taxation on the "rent" of land. Hence, in the real economy a leftward leaning supply curve for land, with intensifying stress on uses of residential, commercial and all land forms. See Mason Gaffney's writing for a complete analysis.
@AUniqueHandleName4448 жыл бұрын
You fail to mention productivity improvements due to capital accumulation, which seems like a huge oversight. You don't need to invent new things or discovery new resources to increase productivity. Building new real estate doesn't involve an increase in technology, resource discovery, or business processes, but it does boost economic output per worker by virtue of increasing output without increasing workers.
@alexpred60798 жыл бұрын
+Laereom using capital you purchase technology (or real estate) which in turn is an increase no?
@carlosortegap8 жыл бұрын
Because that's short term productivity increase.
@cdsilber11 жыл бұрын
I say no, because all the emotions in the world can't create trillions of dollars in credit out of thin air. Only the central bank and the fractional reserve multiplier can do that. But trillions of dollars in newly created credit can certainly cause asset price increases that fuel the "animal spirits" in businesses and investors. JMHO.
@laurathefair12 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahaha! the way he says technology @ 1:00 Hi-larious!
@duenaya12 жыл бұрын
it either goes up or down right. so it's a model that really doesn't have much value. but i'll pretend i believe it coz i am taking econ.
@sukhdevbishnoi86937 жыл бұрын
try to make it more realistic as it is taught in the class.
@ThePeterDislikeShow12 жыл бұрын
I wish people would eat less junk food, everyone would be more productive, and the entire pie would grow, and people, even those who used to make money off junk food, would have more to their name.
@american2366 жыл бұрын
The corporations and big banks control the gdp. Or at least they try.
@azb011112 жыл бұрын
it can be manipulated.
@504BlueDevil11 жыл бұрын
not a single word about the artificially manipulated price of money?
@emir16ini12 жыл бұрын
Like I don't know that...
@muhammedlaminceesay8888 Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤
@nikunjrajput1604 жыл бұрын
I need this video in Hindi audio.i also go to ur hindi channel but u change medium as well in ur hindi channel. do u have any channel whose medium of writing is English but audio is Hindi....but whenever I switch to ur hindi channel in search of hindi audio it's medium of writing is also change to Hindi.... disappointed .... really....u should have a channel in which u may chose write in English but u need to speak hindi.the problem in India is just we need hindi audio content ....it's doesn't mean we don't read and write English ..just we have better understanding in hindi audio
@SoundboothTheaterLive12 жыл бұрын
Mr. Khan, you seem to be a highly knowledgeable and diligent student of science. I sincerely hope that one day you put down the Keynes, and pick up the Mises. I guarantee you, Mises and praxeology are far more consistent with the true sciences than Keynes and his "animal spirits." Ludwig Von Mises, Human Action. The Ludwig Von Mises Institute is giving it away on their site. It pains me that a man with your credibility and intelligence is living without understanding Human Action.
@carlosortegap8 жыл бұрын
Khan academy is a project; not the guide. How is Mises more consistent with Keynesians which actually use models and facts?
@benmooney2802 жыл бұрын
What happens when the population decreases?
@ledarriuswhite632710 жыл бұрын
wats up walden
@saadat70011 жыл бұрын
Your avatar made me punch my computer screen O_o lol
@halimselim67433 жыл бұрын
I am here after bitcoin crash !
@wildbill052812 жыл бұрын
not second
@xcvsdxvsx11 жыл бұрын
hi vicki! i would love to explain it to you but i dont have quite enough room here in the comments section. can you add me as a contact please so i can send a private message?
@Tyrant_1312 жыл бұрын
@chocobofarmer2021 You do realize Republicans have been Keynesians for at least 60 to 70 years, right?
@Hoodratliker3 жыл бұрын
Is there a subject that you dont know?!?!?!
@poojanegi92776 жыл бұрын
it is helpful but not that much I like it as well as hate it so this means for u to improve :( :( :(