The Chunky Dutchman That Time Forgot | Fokker T.IV [Aircraft Overview #74]

  Рет қаралды 93,028

Rex's Hangar

Rex's Hangar

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 204
@RexsHangar
@RexsHangar 2 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to improve the quality of the video editing, hope you like changes :) F.A.Q Section Q: Do you take aircraft requests? A: I have a list of aircraft I plan to cover, but feel free to add to it with suggestions:) Q: Why do you use imperial measurements for some videos, and metric for others? A: I do this based on country of manufacture. Imperial measurements for Britain and the U.S, metric for the rest of the world, but I include text in my videos that convert it for both. Q: Will you include video footage in your videos, or just photos? A: Video footage is very expensive to licence, if I can find footage in the public domain I will try to use it, but a lot of it is hoarded by licencing studies (British Pathe, Periscope films etc). In the future I may be able to afford clips :) Q: Why do you sometimes feature images/screenshots from flight simulators? A: Sometimes there are not a lot of photos available for certain aircraft, so I substitute this with digital images that are as accurate as possible. Feel free to leave you questions below - I may not be able to answer all of them, but I will keep my eyes open :)
@stephenremington8448
@stephenremington8448 2 жыл бұрын
How about the planes used in the film The Flight of The Phoenix? (The proper version with James Stewart of course).
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks once more again my friend......Your friend......Shoemaker🇺🇸
@bru2al1tyusa82
@bru2al1tyusa82 2 жыл бұрын
Keep up the great work, awesome videos, and storytelling
@aussiefan354
@aussiefan354 2 жыл бұрын
Junker JU87 Stuka mate
@edwardfletcher7790
@edwardfletcher7790 2 жыл бұрын
10 points for this title !😂 Reality appreciate the use of metric.
@yes_head
@yes_head 2 жыл бұрын
I feel like in the inter-war years it was often enough to be solidly competent, considering how many half-baked or downright horrific designs were fielded by nearly every nation around the world.
@freddiecunningham2860
@freddiecunningham2860 2 жыл бұрын
Why did planes look like they are about to fall apart back in the 20's?
@BHuang92
@BHuang92 2 жыл бұрын
@@freddiecunningham2860 1920s avionics was indeed a weird time!
@kilianortmann9979
@kilianortmann9979 2 жыл бұрын
@@freddiecunningham2860 Cause everything was bloody heavy in the 20s. Duraluminum was a more exotic material than mahogany, thin wall tubing rare and not particularly thin, and seats heavy and upholstered. Combined with the relatively weak engines of the time, the engineers desperately needed to safe weight, without having the proper means to do so.
@freddiecunningham2860
@freddiecunningham2860 2 жыл бұрын
@@kilianortmann9979 😂😂😂.
@More_Row
@More_Row 2 жыл бұрын
You underestimate how hard it is to develop a decent plane. With paper and pens and smaller models. They worked their ass off , bad plane design or not
@Ghostbunny1990
@Ghostbunny1990 2 жыл бұрын
T-IV’s were also used to support a scientific expedition to the interior of New Guinea. Uncharted lakes were discovered and named after T-IV pilots, like the Wissel Lakes (now known as Paniai Lakes).
@kewlwarez
@kewlwarez 2 жыл бұрын
Since you mentioned it, it might be nice to do a feature on the Fokker T.VIII, one of the few aircraft to be flown by both the Luftwaffe and the RAF during WWII in the same role and theatre. Excellent video on an obscure plane!
@ernstschmidt4725
@ernstschmidt4725 2 жыл бұрын
maybe i watched too much porco rosso, but i can't help to love interwar medium flying boats and floatplanes. they're the closest thing to flying ships and the specifically the symmetry of twin engines twin floats is always pretty to me.
@amada9l699
@amada9l699 2 жыл бұрын
I9
@athelwulfgalland
@athelwulfgalland 2 жыл бұрын
What are your thoughts on the Short Singapore or Saunders-Roe London? :D
@ernstschmidt4725
@ernstschmidt4725 2 жыл бұрын
@@athelwulfgalland the singapore push an pull is really cool. the SR london is more conventional tho. however both have their floats in the extremes as they're true flying boats. i was thinking more like the heinkel floatplanes (59,115) with their twin catamaran floats. but true flying boats (AKA with boat hulls) are of course amazing too
@athelwulfgalland
@athelwulfgalland 2 жыл бұрын
@@ernstschmidt4725 Ah I see! Yeah, flying boats have always intrigued me. (Do-26, Do-18, Do-24, etc.) Float planes are pretty cool too though. Have you seen a Ju-52 on a pair of floats?! There's a four engine bent-winged-bird that was originally used as a mail plane, called the Blohm und Voss Ha-139, that went on to serve with the Luftwaffe as a recon plane, transport & mine sweeper. Wiki that thing! It's a sharp piece of work. The He-114 was pretty nice as well. We can't go without talking German float planes without mentioning the Arado Ar-196 of course! Of course when I start thinking of German planes of that period, that spent time with the water, I immediately start thinking of the Bv-138, Bv-222 & Bv-238. That reveals my penchant for flying boats though. The French had some really interesting ones too - for that matter.
@Nipplator99999999999
@Nipplator99999999999 2 жыл бұрын
It's a bit outside of the usually considered flying boats and just missed the interwar period, but I'm partial to the Vought-Sikorsky VS-300...it takes off and lands in water, and only slightly more likely to kill you doing it. Yeah, my rotor craft specialist is showing, but I think it's beautiful, like a train wreck, I know it shouldn't exist, but couldn't ignore it if I wanted too. If to unrefined to be memorable, than the shear insanity of deciding a aircraft, still being developed in 1941, doesn't have enough working against it, so adds water. Guess it could make crashes when the laughable fuel capacity is depleted safer maybe 🤔, especially when extra is required to overcome the retention force of water taking off.
@dpswets
@dpswets 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome to see you covering a Dutch aircraft. I've always loved the weird look of the T.IV. 32 built seems like not much, but was pretty normal for a Dutch order at the time. We didn't have more than 30-40 aircraft of the same type usually.
@stephengardiner9867
@stephengardiner9867 2 жыл бұрын
Wow!... I bet I will be waiting a VERY long time to see this released in 1/48 or 1/72! I'd buy one! Damn thing is so homely it's irresistible!
@browserrr1
@browserrr1 2 жыл бұрын
A short run 1/72 resin model was released long ago, might be 25 years. Still need to finish it, real life interfering.
@theothertonydutch
@theothertonydutch 2 жыл бұрын
Get a 3d printer.
@pythosdegothos6181
@pythosdegothos6181 2 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking. Just a homely looking, and seemingly trusty machine. Aside from the one incident with the new commander. I would have loved a model of this odd looking but endearing looking machine.
@MVC670
@MVC670 2 жыл бұрын
Well, as a kid, I had a 1/72 scale model Supermarine Walrus. So sheer klunkiness is no barrier to making a model out of it. The Plane with a Paunch...instant lovability.
@stephengardiner9867
@stephengardiner9867 2 жыл бұрын
Love the old "Shagbat" too!@@MVC670
@matthewdarnell7313
@matthewdarnell7313 2 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite channels
@stephenmeier4658
@stephenmeier4658 2 жыл бұрын
It is very good
@caseyprice5061
@caseyprice5061 2 жыл бұрын
I had a gun youtuber, a tank youtuber, then a ship youtuber, i now have aircraft. The list is complete. Great content!
@mo07r1
@mo07r1 2 жыл бұрын
Check out the channel Gregs Planes And Automobiles; its interesting hearing about aircraft from the perspective of a pilot
@kiplingslastcat
@kiplingslastcat 2 жыл бұрын
I LOVE those old observation windows! Just fantastic!
@pythosdegothos6181
@pythosdegothos6181 2 жыл бұрын
This just seems to be the story of a rather trusty, durable, and deceivingly nimble aircraft that plodded on against a lot of odds, not the least of which being obsolete. Too bad they could not be flown to safety. Only 30 some odd made eh? It is a unique looking, and rather whimsical appearing machine to be honest.
@ricardokowalski1579
@ricardokowalski1579 2 жыл бұрын
Anything that can fly reliably, in the harsh conditions of 1930s Asia, so far away from the factory, for so long is notable. 👍
@an_f-14_tomcat
@an_f-14_tomcat 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! I would've never even heard of this thing without you!
@emergingloki
@emergingloki 2 жыл бұрын
Ditto. Not the first time, and I doubt the last.
@finnbradley3230
@finnbradley3230 2 жыл бұрын
Super video, which came out just as I'm going to study Aeronautical Engineering in the Netherlands!
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 2 жыл бұрын
Locking forward to your furthering of the great aviation heritage of the Netherlands.
@finnbradley3230
@finnbradley3230 2 жыл бұрын
@@anzaca1 Thanks, so am I!
@sandwich5344
@sandwich5344 2 жыл бұрын
succes met je opleiding!!
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 2 жыл бұрын
The photos and film you provide are always period correct and a true delight to see because I know I'm not likely to see them anywhere else. Excellent work and always appreciated. Thanks, Rex.
@admiraltiberius1989
@admiraltiberius1989 2 жыл бұрын
Another(!!!!) Seaplane??? Rex you spoil us with these absolute gems.
@Dank_Lulu
@Dank_Lulu 2 жыл бұрын
The video and info are great and all. But that thumbnail and title alone are worth the algorithm clicks! It made my day, quite glad this gem popped-up in my suggested feed.
@johnforsyth7987
@johnforsyth7987 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for another informative video about an aircraft that I did not even know existed. Watching your channel is always a learning experience.
@morteforte7033
@morteforte7033 2 жыл бұрын
Planes like this are why I subscribed to your channel, keep up the good work!( And the good jokes.. the one about the ventral gunner taking shots at submarines got me laughing out loud)
@nilo70
@nilo70 2 жыл бұрын
As always , another interesting tale of the history of aircraft ! Thank you for making this happen !
@JohnnoDordrecht
@JohnnoDordrecht 2 жыл бұрын
Great video , from a chunky Dutchman
@adrianrutterford762
@adrianrutterford762 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a fascinating video. Shining a light on a corner of history that I hadn’t heard of before.
@andyb7900
@andyb7900 2 жыл бұрын
Best title ever!
@gregbolitho9775
@gregbolitho9775 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@paulmetzgar2604
@paulmetzgar2604 2 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work. Thank you for adding the Imperial measuring units into the video. It saves a lot of quick math and makes the video more enjoyable.
@donaldvincent
@donaldvincent 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks again for making us a bit smarter.
@Themanwithnoscreenname
@Themanwithnoscreenname 2 жыл бұрын
I see what you did with that title in the thumbnail, and I give a hearty chuckle.
@thelexkex
@thelexkex 2 жыл бұрын
a lot of videos of such an old plane have been preserved, this is good.
@jvd6859
@jvd6859 2 жыл бұрын
Great vid! Love to see vid's about the other Fokker seaplanes and/or bombers.
@Aengus42
@Aengus42 2 жыл бұрын
The writing, editing & content are all great. The only thing I noticed is the presence of a smooth, painted, in corner of the room or a very, very small room with bare walls. It's the first thing I thought of as you started talking. It may not be a thing that bothers you. It's just that your recording space is doing more than colour your audio, it's actually giving a fair old chunk of reverb. Apart from that small thing I'm loving this channel & the aircraft you're showing us. Cheers Rex! Much appreciated mate 😃
@TDChannelKSP
@TDChannelKSP 2 жыл бұрын
I must comment just to applaud the title/thumbnail combo.
@mikepette4422
@mikepette4422 2 жыл бұрын
well done nice short video about a forgotten plane,
@Dr.K.Wette_BE
@Dr.K.Wette_BE 2 жыл бұрын
0:51 🤣 That plane ! (especially the exhaust)
@scottfw7169
@scottfw7169 2 жыл бұрын
"Chunky Dutchman" sounds like it should be name for either a drink, a dessert, or a packaged snack having fifteen gazillion calories from sugar.
@RichardGoth
@RichardGoth 2 жыл бұрын
Another fantastic video! Thanks!
@charlescann531
@charlescann531 2 жыл бұрын
Love what you do I even like your obsession with ugly aircraft. Keep up the great job.
@pavarottiaardvark3431
@pavarottiaardvark3431 2 жыл бұрын
A video on the T.VIII would be cool, what with the Free Dutch use from Pembroke Dock.
@Ontos_M50
@Ontos_M50 2 жыл бұрын
best thumbnail I've ever seen
@Governmenttruth
@Governmenttruth 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for covering a Dutch plane!
@shiftlessalaska2848
@shiftlessalaska2848 2 жыл бұрын
My local aviation museum just finished restoring the one and only remaining Fairchild Pilgrim. It is an unusual looking aircraft, and my search for information on this 1930s oddity, has turned up little. I would LOVE if you did a video on it.
@mrains100
@mrains100 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@Dr.K.Wette_BE
@Dr.K.Wette_BE 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate when you put the numbers on screen. (even in french I have to pause to figure out "how much")
@maxmachac9756
@maxmachac9756 2 жыл бұрын
Youre up there with Mustard when it comes to quality and content!
@MattVF
@MattVF 2 жыл бұрын
Best title so far !
@terraflow__bryanburdo4547
@terraflow__bryanburdo4547 2 жыл бұрын
Best vid title ever
@maryclarafjare
@maryclarafjare 2 жыл бұрын
Really cool video, as ever! Thanks Rex 😊
@lewiswestfall2687
@lewiswestfall2687 2 жыл бұрын
great video
@jasonz7788
@jasonz7788 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@167curly
@167curly 2 жыл бұрын
Those Fokker float-planes looked like sturdy work-horses, Rex.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman 2 жыл бұрын
@Rex's Hangar >>> 👍👍
@josvandenberg6600
@josvandenberg6600 2 жыл бұрын
Like the episode about Fokker airplanes, I would appreciate some attention to the G.I as well.
@jamesdeath3477
@jamesdeath3477 2 жыл бұрын
Could you do a piece on the Piaggio Pegna Pc7 please?
@167curly
@167curly 8 ай бұрын
They were unsung heroes.
@dallesamllhals9161
@dallesamllhals9161 7 ай бұрын
The Fokkers?
@gregbolitho9775
@gregbolitho9775 2 жыл бұрын
Nice 1 Rex, you doin well. Ya don't havta run round wid ya arse or ya wings on fire/s to be bludy good huh!
@richardferg6455
@richardferg6455 2 жыл бұрын
The Fokker T VIII, was a capable aircraft deserving a future video. Please?🙂
@flexygoo1295
@flexygoo1295 2 жыл бұрын
LOL solid thumbnail 👌
@Aviopic
@Aviopic 2 жыл бұрын
After almost 41 years at Fokker I didn't forget about it 😉
@Babayaga962
@Babayaga962 2 жыл бұрын
Hey Rex. I love your content. I have a bit of an offer for you. My great grandfather served in the First World War for America. He was a military photographer, and we still have many of his photos. While his service history is still quite unknown, he took many pictures of aircraft, some incredibly obscure and many experimental. Including one of only a few pictures of a monoplane called the sopwith swallow. Most of the photos seem to have been taken at Chanute Air Force base, but he may have taken some elsewhere. I would love to share some of these photos with you because I’m sure you would find them very interesting, is there any place I can send them to? Email or something? It’s up to you. Thanks for the awesome content.
@drstevenrey
@drstevenrey Жыл бұрын
I am amazed. I thought the Dutch are only really good at building hand long tapered paper tubes with funny stuff inside. Respect.
@petercoo9177
@petercoo9177 2 жыл бұрын
What are those single-engined floatplanes at 8:40? This is not a type I've ever seen before!
@flufflepuffle6229
@flufflepuffle6229 2 жыл бұрын
Future topic suggestion: P-61 Black Widow. First aircraft designed specifically to be a night fighter. Looked down upon at the start of its career and considered inferior to the Mosquito, until a competition where the P-61 smoked the Mosquito in every lane of performance despite being the size of a B-25 bomber. And technically the P-61 shot down the last axis aircraft before the surrender of Japan, by maneuver kill. First US aircraft to successfully demonstrate the concept of ejection seats (using captured German equipment).
@michaelhowell2541
@michaelhowell2541 2 жыл бұрын
Love the title!
@sebastianmartellisr.3587
@sebastianmartellisr.3587 2 жыл бұрын
The saying "One Fat Fokker" had me on the ground before I even watched the video 😅😂🤣
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting little aircraft
@RetroGamesCollector
@RetroGamesCollector 2 жыл бұрын
I gave you a thumbs up just for the title. I'll give the video a watch now 🤣
@lairdcummings9092
@lairdcummings9092 2 жыл бұрын
Workman-like and steady are still virtues, if not glorious.
@KyriosMirage
@KyriosMirage 2 жыл бұрын
I hadn't realized just how much the Cyclone got around in the 30s.
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe Ай бұрын
What did these Aircraft Discover on patrol at Java Sea precisely? How good was Dutch Radio equipment?
@jackmehoff1840
@jackmehoff1840 2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the Fokker G1, another relatively unknown Fokker plane
@bobfry5267
@bobfry5267 2 жыл бұрын
Australia out of range? I'd have given it a try. Better than being captured by the Japanese.
@mikepette4422
@mikepette4422 2 жыл бұрын
probably nowhere to find aircraft fuel between java and timor
@truckerallikatuk
@truckerallikatuk 2 жыл бұрын
Fill the bomb bay with fuel, and give it a go. Fly at most economical speed and altitude, you'll get a chance to land and refuel... worth a shot.
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 2 жыл бұрын
The nearest suitable location in Australia was Broome and the Japanese noted where the evacuating flying boats were headed and mounted a significant raid which nearly wiped out every flying boat in Northern Australia. The flying boats that survived were pulled out and sent South then anticlockwise around Australia to Queensland. Around this time a Top Secret Flying Boat Repair Facility was established at Lake Boga in Victoria, not far from the rail line to Mildura. It was here on the edges of a lake 3 miles by 2 miles with a sandy snag free lake that flying boats in the Australian/South West Pacific Theatre could undertake heavy maintenance and repairs free from the threat of attacks by carrier borne aircraft. Engines and other items requiring overhaul, repair or replacement parts could be supported by industry based in Melbourne and items and personnel shipped by rail service from Melbourne. There is small museum located in the former Communications Bunker and various static and video displays. A Catalina flying boat is permanently mounted on display outside. Mark from Melbourne Australia
@BrassLock
@BrassLock 2 жыл бұрын
​@@markfryer9880 Good Onya Mark, what a delightfully complete piece of history that many Aussies need to know about. Most Sandgropers know of the Catalinas based in Matilda Bay but not of the repair facilities you've described.
@bobfry5267
@bobfry5267 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikepette4422 You'll get part of the way. Swim the rest, if you know how badly the Japanese would behave.
@calvingreene90
@calvingreene90 2 жыл бұрын
The old soldier that takes his rifle sits by the window and tells the youngens to run and and come avenge them after they have prepared.
@rossr100
@rossr100 2 жыл бұрын
With a title like that - immediate thought - Rex's Hanger. lol
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 2 жыл бұрын
0:57 That Banyan tree exhaust demands that I ask...is that a rotary lying on its _back?_
@KitKabinet
@KitKabinet 2 жыл бұрын
Several of these planes (together with Dornier Wal seaplanes) were also used to end the mutiny on HNLMS De Zeven Provinciën in 1933.
@General_Rubenski
@General_Rubenski 2 жыл бұрын
Now you have to do the Fokker T.V Now that is a chonky Boi
@martijn9568
@martijn9568 2 жыл бұрын
It seems like it was a decent bomber (and aerial cruiser) for its time to be honest. The forward gunner wielded a 20 mm canon.
@brucebartup6161
@brucebartup6161 2 жыл бұрын
Forgive a wild idea. The shape of f the rear lower fuselage, if the torpedo was carried internally, might be wide enough for the torpedo to be dropped to the rear rather than conventionally down wards. In the Swordfish for a contemporary comparator or the Catalina the munition was suspended from clamps which opened to release the load cleanly downwards. Problems included the shock damage to the torpedo as the munition hit the sea surface nose first and damage to the aircraft from the powerful splash . To that extent torpedo use favoured the flying boats and float planes. These marine aircraft had the structure strong enough to cope with a water landing and thus could handle the splash. In the case of the swordfish a wire could be tensioned from the munitions nose to a. strong point on the plane aa it reeled out under tension it delayed and reduced the impact speed thus allowing the tor5pedo to tevel out near the surface without exceeding 5 fathoms depth. HOw to ;laumch a gtorpoedo bckwards (one idea) So take one Swordfish. one with arrestor wire . Make a Tin Can 18" wide and as ;long as the torpedo. in fact make that up to 4' longer than the torpedo itself bit clear clear the tail wheel etc. Rib reinforced small panels = much like the Swordfish geodetic structure. At the front of the Tin Can is a baffle. The Tin Can is a torpedo tube Load it find the enemy and engage. Launch : release the torpedpo clamps the Tin Can expoands roto it' s full 19 or 24 " width (there was an overlap) Tge torpedo will be held by the nod on its ineia resl anb suspended in the midlle f the tube by the ame Berbnouill forces that lift jumbo jets (and Swordfish aircraft). Befor it was beiong suported efgfi ientll by wings, now ineffivcytlyu bu the tmn Can. Pwrhaposv 1.5 sdecinds afteer the sprungb reeel ends a pair of dhears kintrnal to the tootrprd ciurts the hawser at a buiolt in wesak pint. The torpedo will be pushed backwards, ejectd by the ;prtesuee differwbce vthwe wire was bearing at the momeng of beiing cut. 'll rycalulatioonson this later, for now I don't know. udt swilfc xspeculatuikkion pogf vcodarse
@jonesy279
@jonesy279 Жыл бұрын
Top tier title in the thumbnail 😂
@quertize
@quertize 2 жыл бұрын
Any chance of vid on Conwing L-16 seaplane?
@oscarcornah-burrows3347
@oscarcornah-burrows3347 2 жыл бұрын
You should 100000% make a video on the Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI
@torg1
@torg1 2 жыл бұрын
I do love the between war Fokkers.
@keithmoore5306
@keithmoore5306 2 жыл бұрын
yeah easy to overlook what you don;t hear much about!! like the new specs graphics format!!
@adrianrevill7686
@adrianrevill7686 2 жыл бұрын
When ever i see these old biplanes especially the wierder ones i think of the magnificent men in their flying machines wallpaper i had as a kid. It was all the cartoons from the film credits.
@Nipplator99999999999
@Nipplator99999999999 2 жыл бұрын
I had forgotten how, I'll call it robust, initial hand turned wooden props were during aviation's teething interwar period. I hate to imagine the chuck of steel required to force the initial boat paddles to beat the air into submission, without shaking the wings off.
@boctopus9823
@boctopus9823 2 жыл бұрын
Last night i was thinking that I really want to see a video on this plane
@boctopus9823
@boctopus9823 2 жыл бұрын
This is awesome lol
@DHNetwork
@DHNetwork 2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about the Dutch KOOLHOVEN airplanes?
@P61guy61
@P61guy61 2 жыл бұрын
Are those Ryan STA or STM on floats at 8+46?
@pythosdegothos6181
@pythosdegothos6181 2 жыл бұрын
yep
@glhx2112
@glhx2112 2 жыл бұрын
Noticed that too. Very rare seeing them on floats.
@Emdee5632
@Emdee5632 2 жыл бұрын
Did you read Dutch language sources as well, or only English language sources?
@landak136
@landak136 2 жыл бұрын
I really need to dig Indonesian aviation history more. Aside from the usual F.VII and D.XXI around at that time, I never heard about this plane.
@DarkDutch007
@DarkDutch007 2 жыл бұрын
although i dont think any made it to indonesia, you should look at the Fokker G1.
@richitunder7997
@richitunder7997 2 жыл бұрын
More Dutch planes please?
@douglasfur3808
@douglasfur3808 2 жыл бұрын
"Wright Cyclones"! Does this ubiquitous power plant, or the Wright range, and history need a video or 2?
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 2 жыл бұрын
Probably long overdue as there was an extensive range of different sizes available and an impressive list of aircraft powered by the engines.
@adamrodaway9116
@adamrodaway9116 2 жыл бұрын
4 blade prop at 5:10 !?!?
@anthonyburke5656
@anthonyburke5656 2 жыл бұрын
Many years ago, at Broome in Western Australia, I was on a trip diving along the coast when a local told me of a “Squadron” of Dutch “Flying Boats” that Japanese Zeros had caught on the water and sunk. We dived and there were the carcasses of at least 4 of them, corrosion was so bad you could literally have torn them apart with your bare hands. A lot of good memories of that trip, the fish we caught and ate. It was the first time I’d come across systemised racists in Austral as well, the Police were thugs who beat the back males and raped the black females.
@rockoorbe2002
@rockoorbe2002 2 жыл бұрын
For some reason I'm imagining Ben Stiller promoting this plane
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 2 жыл бұрын
You see those headers that went straight up & joined at the top... I "SEE" why that didn't catch on...at 51seconds
@AByteofCode
@AByteofCode 2 жыл бұрын
So the fokker has a cockpit hmmm Otherwise some feedback: - Having graphic intros for the first few seconds tends to hurt retention so I'd look into that - Once you hear the gaspy breathing between sentences it becomes really hard to ignore, so it could be worth editing those out
@HosenMatzDeluXe
@HosenMatzDeluXe 2 жыл бұрын
Most hilarious title! 😂
@wintersbattleofbands1144
@wintersbattleofbands1144 2 жыл бұрын
They're patrons, not patreons. The platform is called Patreon. Your patrons support you through Patreon.
@skymaster4121
@skymaster4121 2 жыл бұрын
I always hoped that Fokker did a plane and called it mother…or little 🤣
@SandsOfArrakis
@SandsOfArrakis 2 жыл бұрын
I guess you could call this one the Fat Fok. 😅
@MrDino1953
@MrDino1953 2 жыл бұрын
I think it strange that the specs issued by government authorities mandated the number of crew members. Why not simply state the performance and operational requirements and let the aircraft companies come up with designs that met those needs with as few crew members as possible? This would have helped minimise exposure of valuable crew to risk, reduce the weight and cost of the aircraft and make training more efficient. I could understand it if the spec was an upper limit, but they always seem to be stated as a target number that must be met, as if the authorities knew how to design aircraft better than the company experts did.
@brianperry
@brianperry 2 жыл бұрын
The legend reminded me of the old joke ...'Quite right madam, but those three Fokkers were Messerschmitts.....
@dougalachi
@dougalachi 2 жыл бұрын
Good puns
黑天使只对C罗有感觉#short #angel #clown
00:39
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 35 МЛН
We Attempted The Impossible 😱
00:54
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
人是不能做到吗?#火影忍者 #家人  #佐助
00:20
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Mini Pfeil; The Fokker D.XXIII
8:22
Ed Nash's Military Matters
Рет қаралды 129 М.
The Fokker D.XIII; Germany’s Secret Fighter
8:44
Ed Nash's Military Matters
Рет қаралды 35 М.
Dutch Aircraft of World War Two - Part 1
13:15
General History
Рет қаралды 3,3 М.