The Court Is STACKED Against Us

[@kaischulte9275]

Anybody on the highest court displaying Nazi or right wing symbols or sucking up to Harlan Crow needs to be dismissed immediately and not in 18 years!

[@sharonspilman4955]

Agree 💯

[@seanlee7563]

That thing sitting in SC is worst than C.

[@LouieMcGood-ef6ud]

A democrat Harry Truman brought Nazi’s to America. You can’t make this up

[@rethablair6902]

YESSSS

[@bionicleanime]

Stacked EXACTLY like how Mcconnell wants it to be: POWER to the rich, FOR the rich, BY the rich.

[@LouieMcGood-ef6ud]

You mean the millionaires in the courts that make 100,000 a year

[@anodynesonvolt]

It is illogical to not include the current judges. Some of their behaviors are the reason term limits are finally being discussed.

[@crystallilly1814]

Anything that would apply to the current justices would never pass, especially with the incoming administration. This probably will not go anywhere and really should have been a focus since Roe v Wade was overturned.

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@anodynesonvolt]

Unfortunately, you are correct.

[@CraigSmith568]

Needs to be term limits on the senate and congress also.

Finally, something we can agree upon . Pelosi , McConnell, all the republicrats - they hate America And need to go - then country can heal

[@susanhayes5186]

Two terms, just the president.

[@luke070610]

18 is too long. Personally, 10 seems more reasonable plus an enforceable code of ethics.

[@mikeboothe]

Yes!

[@rockerchic8144]

💯

[@delanajosey4867]

Two terms just like the president

[@TairnKA]

I agree, plus when their sworn in, they vow to be Anti-partyism as part of a fiduciary requirement towards all U.S. citizens.

[@RealBradMiller]

Now, is this the Republican law for enforcing underage pregnancies or a term limit on judges? You decide.

[@sandraweiss752]

These people should be VOTED in by WE THE PEOPLE and NOT placed by either party.

[@rethablair6902]

YESSSSSSS

[@Darqshadow]

I would argue that having it be appointed by the senate is fine, but only if we can keep the politics out. Trying to vote them in will be such a mess...

[@faithmorgan3255]

There should be not only term limits, but especially ethical standards in place. It is absolutely a slap in the face of all other decent judges who have rules to live by, so it simply makes sense that the highest court in America should live by those same rules.

[@LostintheTwilightZone]

Well, the Appeals courts need to have some serious standards as well......there should be a way to get rid of a nincompoop judge like Aileen Cannon.....totally incompetent and compromised.....

[@old_grey_cat]

Ethical standards with penalties enforced by a body outside the SCOTUS.

[@faithmorgan3255]

@@old_grey_cat I agree with you 110%!

[@angelalynn9393]

I agree 👍🏽

[@scoobydoo3928]

U.S. citizens need to know. The Supreme Court has voted 80% of the time in favor of Chamber of Commerce over citizens, for the last 2 decades at least. That means they vote in favor of Corporations, 80% of the time. What does that tell you?

[@angelalynn9393]

😡😡😡

[@adamknight4087]

@@scoobydoo3928 GREED!

[@laurabaker6774]

I’m now 71 and this has been a shocking decade to have my mind wrapped around .

[@MsC-o9j]

10 years is enough just like senate and congress.

[@marilynm677]

Along with an enforceable code of ethics, and term limits (18 years seems too long to me too), I am in favor of expanding the Supreme Court from 9 Justices to 13. There are 13 judicial circuits in the US; currently some justices manage more than one circuit. This is a logical reason for expanding the court. And the situation as it now exists is SO extreme, SO stacked and corrupted I feel court expansion is a necessary part of the cleanup of corruption and partisanship. And I feel there must be prosecutions for financial bribery accepted by current Justices, and remove them from the court. Thanks Brando.

[@aaronjjacques]

We should do it immediately so trump can appoint the judges.

[@siswohlslagel8919]

Nope🙅‍♀️​@aaronjjacques

[@juliemissick4206]

I agree. There should be one justice for each judicial circuit. None of them should be allowed to be over more than one circuit.

[@Vohlfied]

The conservatives on the Supreme Court recently ruled that bribery of a judge is legal. Seriously-- a 6/3 split, with the liberal justices going "Of course it's still a bribe even if you promise to wait until after they rule in you're favor to pay it!"

[@jennifernorthcutt6462]

When SCOTUS was started, people didn't live this long. Life expectancy was much lower.

[@HelenByrd-yf9cf]

Excellent point!

[@Justin-fl1nv]

Yeah no one expected people to hold onto the position for twenty or thirty years

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@eclecticvicki8376]

True. It was 50 when Washington was alive. I feel sure that’s one reason why they made it a life term.

[@KathleenPatterson-d7s]

I would like to see half of them impeached.

[@Remedy462]

I would like Impeachment to actually do something.

[@seanmiller5460]

I wonder which half🤔 Probably the side you disagree with😂

[@daleboylen6427]

But not Biden.

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@Remedy462]

@daleboylen6427 For?

[@stevens8490]

I've lost complete faith in our supreme Court.

[@adamknight4087]

@@stevens8490 It's another branch of MAGA !

[@charliewortham]

The infested swamp

[@janet1792]

I agree with you! Even 18 years is too long. It is progress. Still think the new bill should apply to current justices especially the three maga ones.

[@ileneragland369]

6 maga justices dear! The deck is stacked 6 right wing extremists. 3 democrats.

[@marybrown7203]

I don't feel like doing math right now, but it must have to do with a president's four year term and each getting two appointments. It seems like Biden or Senator Whitehouse mentioned 18 years as well. It might be the math of it all.

[@maryloulindquist7453]

18 years IS TOO LONG. WAYYYYY TOO LONG.

[@notpub]

A generational cohort usually occurs in 15 years. So, given that a generational cohort can typically be representatives of new science, new technologies, new ideas, and most importantly, values and morés shift. So, if we add 18 (the age to vote for the last person in a specific generation to 15 = 23 years ). 23 year limits.

[@calebwalker3294]

Agreed! 12 years TOPS

[@lynnevanvorce7727]

How are they still allowed to sit on the bench after such wanton corruption ?

[@MF-ty2zn1]

Republicans in Congress

[@thedrunkshinobi]

We aren't out in the streets demanding they don't. Until the people make it clear that they won't deal with it any more they will push to see how far they can take the corruption.

[@kirikohopps363]

Lol you people had 4 years to be rid of it but your God's didn't want to go that way

[@123123lad]

The corruption is within the d party. And the media conartist like this man. The MSM. And your brain has been so duped that you think it's OK to terminate the beginning of new human life. Youre so messed up that you question that.

[@tystkanin9996]

idk...how was Trump elected the next president when, among many other blatantly corrupt issues, he is a FELON?

[@jasonmontoya1081]

Thank you, Brando! Keep up the good work!

[@franciscomeza8905]

Thanks Brando 👍💙.

[@veraherrmann4106]

I agree we also need to gett rid of the lecture vote

[@markrincon832]

The Supreme Court justices were supposed to be non bias

[@jesstreloar7706]

They are human, I think it is unreasonable to think they would be unbiased.

[@crystallilly1814]

@@jesstreloar7706 The entire system relies on judges being as unbiased as possible, and where applicable to recuse themselves if they are biased. The problem is that having that stipulation is relying on the honor system and some justices are not honorable, regardless of if they are referred to as such. But generally speaking judges are supposed to be able to interpret the law without considering their own religious/personal/cultural stance on the subject. I think it's been a progression for a while now of judges in general allowing themselves to insert what they think it should be, instead of what the law has been interpreted as, and now they just blatantly say the opposite of the law if that pleases their liege.

[@HarryDirtay]

There is no such thing. Anyone telling you they're unbiased, is lying to you or themselves. Bias isn't necessarily bad. If you're cousin steals from you, you're gone be biased against them right? Unjust or unfounded bias is bad, bias against groups based on the actions of an individual is bad. Bias is a survival tool. Like most tools, one can hurt themselves badly using it.

[@notpub]

Yeah, and racism no longer exists.😂

[@notpub]

​@HarryDirtay Truth! Like a hammer. Is it something used to put up a roof or is it a murder weapon? Better yet, is it art?

[@garypatton3715]

Add four justices to SCOTUS

[@kevinzink9063]

Sure. We can do that in 2025 :)

[@LeosHouse]

@@kevinzink9063 😂👍🏻

[@amandaneumann1173]

We The People should vote in our Supreme Court Justices! Otherwise,there is ALWAYS conflicts of interest!

[@jcwp333]

Ridiculous to have a lifetime appointment!

[@CarrieLovesLife.]

When the Supreme Court was established, the average life span was much shorter than it is today, so it probably was a reasonable idea at the time.

[@SheriReemtsen]

Times have changed so must we

[@kevinzink9063]

There was a purpose for that. THe Supreme court wasnt meant to have judges appointed with every new president. The rulings were meant to stand for a very long time

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@frankmorris4790]

worked for 245 years, but you know better.... Thanks for playing comrade

[@kathyhathaway8823]

Corruptly stacked against us .

[@RickMcGuire-bl2vs]

democracy in work.

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@ninaconnolly6077]

@@RickMcGuire-bl2vs Autocracy at work

[@markcepeda8144]

​​@@RickMcGuire-bl2vsno b.s.from odd old duplicitous donny.... 😒

[@frederickwelham3829]

The fact that SCOTUS was permitted to legalise their own corruption, have a totally voluntary code of ethics with no means of enforcement and twist the Constitution to benefit their favoured political party means they are not serving US justice.

[@delanajosey4867]

Two terms just like the president, depending on their honesty and ethics of working for THE PEOPLE of our country ! We deserve so much BETTER 😔

[@jcwp333]

We absolutely need term limits!

[@lisacurrier1504]

I also feel that Alito and Thomas should be held accountable for THIER ethics violations! Also...WHY the hell is a Senator, LIKE CHUCK GRASSLEY, ALLOWED TO BE IN THE SENATE AT 91 ??

[@timbowman6398]

Because he is still healthier than the current president

[@charliewortham]

@@timbowman6398 You would have thought at 80 something that Grassley would have been too old for a seat at the table during an insurrection, but you would have been wrong. Every one of you are a snake in the grass, huh Tim

[@tyronebroussard1288]

To many maga justices and need term limits.

[@MISSYBSNRN]

Brando you are awesome. I'm a 63 year old grandma. I lean left, probably toward Progressive. I really hope that someone picks up the Medicare for all and reform the **** out of our Healthcare system. I became a Nurse after 50 years of age, so been doing the job just about a decade now. I am saddened that he is retiring after this term. I was shocked to find out my girl 43 and her hubby are MAGA. We just don't talk politics at all. Sad to see so much opinion in the family.

[@jsim519]

Yea cuz it stinks when ppl think for themselves….u should be happy that they aren’t puppets

[@joycebrackbill-henderly8311]

I know what you mean.

[@Athena752-r6h]

I have never discussed politics with my adult children, they need to be free-thinkers. My son is the only MAGA voter in our family . A week before the election I got on my knees and begged him not to vote trump. I pointed out he would be voting to take his 4 daughters rights away and voting against his Dad and I because we live on SSDI and Medicare. Makes it rough to have a relationship with him.

[@jsim519]

@@Athena752-r6h did trump take ss away first time or Medicare ….the answer is no … u have been brainwashed so at least ur son can think for himself and not believe all the fake news lie… he is apparently smarter then u

[@notpub]

I am a 60 year old MawMaw and my youngest son is an hard right Libertarian and my oldest is a far left Progressive. I am a left leaning liberal and my spouse is a traditional Republican, except for social 'wedge' issues. The only MAGA is their Grand PawPaw and he is 88. We have great exchanges of ideas at the table. I can't imagine how dull life would be if I couldn't hear the views of a younger generation and how they see the world. Its fascinating. Example: Great PawPaw: "Thems girl don't need no birth control anyhow, lest they be shim-sharin their cootchee-coo all around these har parts. Yall wait till yours is a married, and then takes what the Good Lord sends yas." Youngest Son: "No way, Pops. Let us, the people, decide if theys a wanna have kids, not if your Gods a thought they should." GPP: "Now lookees here. I won't have no blaspheme at the table." Oldest Son: "In a free country, not everyone has to believe in like, God, y'know." PawPaw: "That's true, son. For us that is Christians though, we can loves for the sinner and not the sin, right Dad?" GPP: Grumbles. Then: "Woe unto thems that got no Jesus in thar hearts. Yo' find out soon enough, I s'pose." (Shrugs). YS: "But so why ya even gotta bring God intos it, Grand Paw Paw? If there IS a God, then he'll knows enough if you need them pills or not." OS: "Good point, bruh. This is about like, justice, and like, fairness. 'Member when yall didn't none approve of my hawg, but when that second that I was 18, I done gots me one, and now yall says it saves us on the gas money jar." GPP : "God 'taint no motorcyclee, boy." Me: "No, but the son's got thar a fair enough point. Taint no one sayin' God is this or that. They's sayin birth contol pills is healthcare, right?" YS:" Um, like I think yall too focused on other folks, and ain't tendin to yers own land. If them folks wanna use that science and it ain't a hurtin' yall, then mind where ya go a messin'." GP: "Whoa now. I don' wan' my hard earn tax dollahs paying for no Jezebel, otherwise yall right, and I pays it no mind." YS: "But ya got no mind against yor dollah payin for them bombs on all thema Palestinian dead--" Me: 'Now please, if we can jus' stay on topic here, son." YS: "MawMaw, I is just sayin, how do ya reckon that they's diff'rent from ones another? We's a talkin' about sanctity of life and babies, hmm?" OS: "Truth, bruh, truth. Yall worried about yer neighbor's junk, but like, yall like, don't make no fuss none 'bout government spendin' on them bombs that they is killin' innocent lil babies with in thar in Palestine..." GP: "I dint say no such a thing, son. Wut I said was I woodn't too happy 'bout fundin' no hoeing, that's a all." GPP: "Amen to that, and pass the taters. Beside, our new President's gonna put a stop to all this har discussion an' send that hoe dollah to me on mine Socials." Me: "Oh Dad, President is more likely fixin' to cut yalls Socials than he is to booster it." GPP: "He can't. I done paid into mine this har wholes life. Plus he done promised an' he a good man, I tell you wut." OS: "Grand PawPaw, um, they all gonna like cut all sorts of government like, spends and wut not." YS: "Dude, buys yerselves some Crypto and nope outta their game." Me turning to GP: "Now hon, I don' knows why yall onsist that only a Jezzy wood a be usin' them thar birthing pills, it sounds a little..." OS: "Misogynistic." Me/GP/GPP: "Wuts that ya got thar?" YS: "Its a bruh that can't get any." GPP: "Any wut?" OS: "No dude, that's um like an incel." GP: "Wehll if ya taint gettin none, then the point of them pills seems a mighty too far ahead in that thar road." OS: "No, like, It means ya hates women." All: "Who hates women?" GPP: "I heard that even them lavendars don' a hate any women none, theys jus prefer it wrong way round. YS: "Who's to determine what's right for everyone now?" OS: "No, no, no. Misogyny is a hating women and like, them being equals and such. So yall put em down as Jezzys when married folk might a goin without thar baccy and can't none afford no babies. " GP: "Weĺl the good book does warn if not judgin' son, so ya gots me thar." etc etc

[@Respect-All13]

10 year limit, age limit of 70. No gifts or money to be given to ANYONE in Government. No more lobbyist allowed to pay ANY politicians. Cap on campaign funds used to be elected, billions are wasted on elections when that money could be used to help our citizens. 💙

[@cherylwoodul9127]

Yes!!!

[@Bellen-zh2rd]

Absolutely agree with you!!!

[@TxDILLIGAFF]

While I agree totally with you regarding the SCOTUS limits I'm afraid that we are stuck with the rest for the foreseeable future. Why? Because the people that are the ones that need to change it are the same people that are benefitting from it. Look at the people in government today. Do you really think that they are all there for the benefit of the people and have an interest in good governing? Maybe %25 are. All of the rest of them are in it totally for the power and the goodybags.

[@porthosduvallon5301]

💯

[@fred2903]

Kamala is the only person to spend over a billion dollars trying to get elected 😂

[@juco4682]

With the Supreme Court the way it is, and now Trump back in office, anyone over 30 will probably never see real progress in America again in their lifetime. That makes me very sad.

[@Athena752-r6h]

I agree, it is very sad 😢 And it makes me worried about what it will like for my grandkids.

[@billstretch9187]

ROFL! Well most of the Country doesn't want body parts cut off of children and most don't care what you perverts want!

[@seanmiller5460]

If you truly believe that government leads us to progress, you're pretty dumb. Please don't have kids.

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@theresebortzfield188]

Fight on

[@gailcapshaw5772]

I’m all for limiting the Supreme Courts lifetime appointments. I love that we had Ruth Bader Ginsburg for as long as she was appointed for. She truly fought for the people and not one particular group or person. But that loyalty just isn’t there anymore and it has to be addressed. Thank you for the update. So glad to hear there’s at least a proposal mapped out and will be brought up for debate.

[@bonniekertes8830]

I agree 18 years is to long. I also don't believe in career politicians. Term limits on all with age limits.

[@MarianneK3759]

and cognitive testing !

[@WilliamOfficeSupply9832]

There are term limits, which is called being involved in Governments. You must be involved in Politics and Policies on a daily basis. President and Madame President Clinton Won The Popular Votes by Landslides in the U.S. in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2008 and 2016.

[@anthonydelfino6171]

It definitely feels too long But without expanding the court, it means any president serving two terms would automatically be able to appoint a majority or even super majority of the justices. So imagine if say a super majority of Bush Jr justices were able to block Obama from getting anything passed until his second term… that’s what shorter terms would look like. No ACA because a super majority of conservative justices would strike it down

[@notpub]

Cognitive testing yes, but if the people want the same thing over and over, shouldn't that be THEIR decision?

[@GingerAmes-p8l]

We are supposed to have ""separate branches of government ""that way the people have the rights and balance between the 3 branches!!THE SUPREME COURT OVER STEP ITS BOUNDS BY GRANTING IMMUNITY TO THE PRESIDENCY!!!

[@scoobydoo3928]

Yeah, I couldn't find that criminal immunity in the Constitution. Seems like they made that crap up outta thin air.

[@aaronjjacques]

The.immunity was granted when Sotomayor voted to give Obama immunity for the Killing of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki The "immunity" granted to trump.was literally a tiny fraction of what was already give before.

[@adamknight4087]

@@GingerAmes-p8l Absolutely!

[@adamknight4087]

@@GingerAmes-p8l Now he can be Dictator!

[@sheilaescott9619]

Also I don't think any judge should have lifetime appointments, in state or local, time limits also for Congress and representative, should not be able to be there till they die.

[@debbiekennedy6030]

Well, bless his freakin' heart, Manchin is actually doing something that makes sense! I guess if you're at the end of your "service," you finally act like you're supposed to. He doesn't have to worry about his constituents' vote now. Brando, I agree that 18 years is faaarrr too long, but this is a start.

[@justalpha9138]

I am 100% in support of this! 18 years is a LONG time, but it is still WAAAAAAYYYYY better than what we currently have!!

[@BusterTucker]

5 years and mental acuity check!

[@patwentland6191]

The 9 justices was set when there was only 9 circuit courts there are 13 circuit courts now so there should be 13 justices on the SCOTUS.

[@jeffcoat1959]

Wonderful. Trump should appoint 4 more justices!

[@debrakennedy7671]

I have zero faith in the MAGA Six.

[@BrendaOsif-zk4fp]

Agree wholeheartedly! Keep talking Tenn Brando.💙🇺🇸

[@stephaniewoods6797]

They need term limits across the board, especially Congress.

[@karendorsey4780]

We need four more justices! Eighteen years is too long 10 years is enough! I hope they pass this legislation! It makes sense! The Supreme Court is supposed to non partisan! Not corrupt!! I think we need to clean house!! There’s no integrity in this court !

[@cindyh3069]

They should do better then this, 10 years maybe 12.

[@volqueen]

How about 5 or 8?

[@diannahill5577]

​@@volqueen, my hubby and I discussed this some months back. We agreed that the Supreme Court should be voted in by WE THE PEOPLE and, 8 yrs tops on the bench.

[@ittt6339]

12 sounds good.

[@anthonydelfino6171]

The problem with anything shorter than 18 years means that a president in two terms can appoint a majority or even a super majority of the justices That can completely break the balance to check the president’s power and actions, or set up a situation where the following president can’t accomplish anything because of the court left by their predecessor. The only way to go lower, honestly, is to also expand the size of the court

[@marilynm677]

And do not give up the ability to expand the court to 13, one for each judicial circuit in the US

[@BirdsNNVA]

18 is indeed too long. I’m thinking 12.

[@arverarobinson6810]

Appreciate you Brando

[@Rayne35]

I think the senators and Congress as well should have term limits, and we need to put something that you need to have some type 0f political background to be president, because we can't have another trump. We need rules and balance. get rid of presidential immunity if you need immunity to do your job as president then you don't need to be president senators Congress the president Supreme Court should all have extensive background checks

[@philadelphiawhovian5641]

exactly how i feel. to add more to one of your points, i always felt like you have to have at least 5 years of experience in the government before you can run for president. and that you cannot be older than sixty years old when you run for your first term.

[@Rayne35]

@@philadelphiawhovian5641everything you said Is how i feel you need a age restriction and some IQ man we need new rules and when I was little i could`ve sworn you couldn't run for president if your a criminal

[@notpub]

No more rules. God it feels like strangulation. With all the surveillance systems out there, how can you not be on tv? Somewhere? Instead let's have our children be educated on civic duty and responsibilities. Like voting. Jury duty. Having the minimal knowledge of the Constitution, its Amendments, Due Process, How to pull over if a siren vehicle is on and is behind you, what a PAC is, why religion is not taught in public education until after high school, etc.

[@PaulRobinson-g6k]

Since we VOTE for those offices I think we need to learn to vote or not vote rather than removing choice. Terms limits don't remove corruption, they can enhance it. As soon as a politician no longer has a chance to remain in office they have no incentive at all to actually represent us. We voters no longer have control. So they will be focused on making their future career on the outside. We will no longer matter.

[@christophersnyder1532]

Clarence Thomas The Train Wreck.

[@michaelread539]

Joe Biden can use the Insurrection Act of 1807 to use the military to arrest Trump and other insurrectionists. Other insurrectionists to include but not limited to Senators, Representatives, and SCOTUS judges. Arrest and immediately put on trial. The biggest showiest trial the world has seen since the Nuremburg trials after WW2. Expose the full extent of the crimes of Trump and his cronies. We may possibly even find that Trump is actually working with foreign agencies to overthrow the USA. For money...

[@adamknight4087]

Thomas was the Trojan Horse. Nothing done to stop him, therefore a president achieved!

[@rosswatkins2277]

You do know sotomayor and thomas were both taking gifts, right. They both are corrupt. You do understand the federal government is totally corrupt.No matter who's in charge, red or blue, right

[@MichaelWhitted-n3n]

He NEVER should have BEEN confirmed to the Bench!!! #AnitaHill

[@kariburlon5790]

I'm 100% for this along with an ethics/oversight on scotus. I'm also for term limits on all politicians with an ethics standard, and donation cap across the board with NO "gifts" allowed.

[@toniH7413]

It only matters if the poorly educated heard your message. They think having power helps them but their wrong. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. They should no longer be called Supreme.

[@scottblah2147]

Not being able to expand the court should be a non starter.

[@markcepeda8144]

12 yrs terms....and punishment for corrupt behavior

[@jeffthuss5613]

They need to add term and age limits for Senators and Representatives too. The selection of 18 years is what eventually allows for each President to nominate 2 justices.

[@ileneragland369]

Excellent idea!

[@IMeMineWho]

Ageism. They should however, have ethics and cogency tests for all politicians. They HAVE term limits for senators and representatives.

[@philippschwarz4539]

I had another idea. How about a wealth limit? If their net worth exceeds what is plausible considering their wages, then they can't run again.

[@diannahill5577]

Agreed. Being in a powerful position for too long can cause multiple issues. Power and money often corrupts.

[@diannahill5577]

​@@philippschwarz4539, I agree. And, they must divulge all of their wealthy connections and keep corporate money out of politics.

[@greenbean1967]

15 yrs is enough for supreme court justices.💩💩💩

[@cindygriffiths5917]

I just pray it comes to an end.

[@glennrichardson654]

Thank You ❣️ stay strong ❤

[@tedspens]

18 years? How about 8 years, and even that is being generous. 18 years for a 55 year old justice IS a lifetime appointment!

[@beabop1457]

I agree. When the proposed amendment said 18, I immediately said 8!

[@Decay3333]

I don’t support term limits for SCOTUS, i support it for all branches of government, All of them or leave it alone.

[@JuanLopez-jw4jg]

10 years is the max time hopefully it's a.step the right direction

[@AnthonySedivec]

Keep on with it, Thank you TB.

[@Gidgi-l6i]

I dont care age or how long anyone is in service. As long as he brings justice! A young bad judge is worse than an old good one.

[@johnmesser3278]

No to 18 years and no to never more than 9 justices. Yes to an enforced code of ethics.

[@vanessarayey1277]

I think 15 year term limits with an extended SCOTUS to at least 13. And a strong ethics code should be added. 💙✌️🥀

[@KarenJoseph-o5u]

I think there needs to be term limits on SCOTUS at this point. When the constitution set it up as life time appointment, men didn't live as long as they do now.

[@neildaniels1423]

From my mother: I may not live to see Clarence Thomas & Samuel Alito punished for accepting Republican and/or corporate bribes, as they will probably retire and enjoy their spoils, BUT I hope I live to see term limits & an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court that is sadly necessary for the corrupted, once-respectable highest court of Our Land. Thanks TB, stay True Blue :)

[@aristocrat_000G]

yes. and Yes!

[@terrijopeterson2277]

We also need an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme court too!

[@GingerAmes-p8l]

There are supposed to be checks and balances!!let's hope we can get back there!!!!..

[@diannahill5577]

🙂👋 This would be a good start! I agree that it should apply to both party affiliations. LET'S GET IT DONE!🙏

[@Sandra-cm5ez]

Should have never been a lifetime appointment🤬

[@FeatheredLife]

It's about darn time that they put on limit on the Supreme Court Justices should have been done a long time ago. And I will agree what's putting on limit on Senators and House of Representatives too. All you have to do is look how old Mitch McConnell is ,then you'll get the picture.Right now, Women have lost their rights to choose, and someplace down the dumb dumb line the president has no consequences, it gives him the right to be a dictator and an a-hole. Just my opinion of course

[@sharonspilman4955]

Great article, thanks Brando.

[@lynntidwell]

Term\Age limits for the supremes!!!!!!!

[@vickiewilliams5570]

I agree 100%

[@sherryarias4695]

This for sure this is what we needed for a long time for sure

[@SassySenior29]

18 years is too long! And limiting to 9, No, we actually need more than that. Our Constitution does not have a number limit

[@johncampbell3979]

Locking in SCOTUS to 9 justices is wrong. There should be one justice per each appeals court. Right now, that is 13.

[@roxanatorres650]

❤your reporting 😊

[@kimsteed9401]

That sounds like a pretty good solution to an intolerable situation.

[@Leskeepingitreal]

I was thinking about what has happened my life time . Thank You Brando

[@jon-tagle]

I agree with term limits for SCOTUS as well as all elected officials in federal government. No more career politicians! 18 years for SCOTUS is too long. I agree with others here, 10 years, max.

[@lterzis]

Thank you for your updates, Brando! 💙

[@agarasudhindra1687]

Thank you, Mr. Brando!

[@suekoons5692]

Definitely ridiculous and a set of ethics to go along with the term limits.

[@LauraNimr]

Thank you for your program.

[@leekosmen2771]

The court works best when its balanced. Right now it's not balanced and therefore it's broken. It's not functional. 16% Approval rating? WOW!"😱

[@SallyS24]

This sounds like a good idea.

[@bettyhopkins6427]

Brando I feel the same way when folks get desperate they try to grasp on to power

[@Maria_7954]

I'm glad you made this video, I can recall when I was homeless and faced with many things in life until $75,000 biweekly began rolling in and my Life went from A homeless nobody to a different person with good things to offer!!!! !!

[@baluraju7387]

That's lovely 🌹if I may ask, How did you come up with so much weekly?

[@Maria_7954]

It's Roberta Ann Caudill doing she changed my life. A BROKER- like her is what you need.

[@Maria_7954]

$_700k and yet still counting on. Roberta Ann is the kind of person one needs in his or her life to be honest❤️❤️❤️>>>>

[@jamietammy4285]

Same, I met Roberta Ann last year for the first time at a conference in Wilshire, after then my Life has changed for good.God bless Patricia Lois.

[@jamietammy4285]

Though I started with as low as $8,000 actually because it was my tirst time and it Was successful, She's is a great personality in the state.

[@kevinjohnson7839]

Thank you ❤

[@markyasaitis6050]

I have been an advocate for term limits for the supreme court, also representatives, and senators. Also, a set mandatory retirement age for all politicians. I also think that politicians should not be getting a lifetime pension for serving only a few terms. So many of them leave Washington and go into the private sector earning huge salaries for lobbying or something similar. It's time we force this issue.

[@thembiphiri7504]

Here on south africa 70 years the magistrate and judge retire and 12 yrs for the chief justice in constitutional court which you called supreme court, all justice serve people not president .

[@andreadernay3304]

I agree Term limits are needed! 10 years max.

[@aquasands1988]

Mr Brando, i like what you focus on talking about on your show! I have been listening since the sad election 😢. Please keep it up!

[@truebluedigit6570]

No constitutional amendment will ever pass in any of our lifetimes.

[@tannerwilson4843]

We need an overhaul and more options on how to amend the Constitution. Many nations for national referendums on adding or changing amendments.

[@krysti2]

Great idea, Manchin and Welch...18 years might be too long, but much better than a lifetime of corruption. Thankyou Brando 🎉

[@estherthorp1608]

I give this a standing 👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@baker0007]

Good thoughts, Brando, let's go even further. How about only two terms for a Senator and only six terms for a Congresspersons...

[@sjin6896]

Congress Term Limits FIRST

[@ElbertHauser-e7z]

I love your show and the way you express your self honestly spoken and enough so someone can add to a fair spoken apenion and mostly what you say l agree with.

[@harriswarren5953]

Point on!!, keep saying!!