The Deadly Secret Kept From the Titanic's Passengers

[@tweedyburd007]

It's already been said but Andrews was not as arrogant as he's portrayed in this "Smithsonian" video. He knew the ship was going to sink within an hour or two at most when she struck the berg and the Captain asked him to evaluate it. He was exactly right, she sank about 1hr 30mins after. He was one of the only high-ranking officials who wanted the ship to be more safe. He initially wanted 64 lifeboats, but people above him in the White Star Line wanted the ship to be less cluttered and to look more appealing. He also wanted the hull to be thicker, but that was moved against for similar reasons. They sacrificed safety for aesthetics, none of which was Andrews' fault. He went down with the ship, with varying accounts of where he was last seen (as with most of the people aboard). In the film, he was looking at the fireplace, which had a painting above it. It was a painting of the passage that the Titanic was supposed to reach heading back from its maiden voyage. He was seen looking at this painting, although until the very last moments in unknown. The man who mostly pushed against his recommendations for safety was the chariman of White Star, Bruce Ismay. He survived the sinking. However, his life was completely changed. He was publicly labeled a coward and shunned. He stepped down from his position and his family vowed to never speak of the Titanic, as whenever it was brought up he would break down. The only time he ever talked about it again was nearly 25 years after, when his grandson asked him if he had been in a shipwreck before. He only replied "yes, I was once aboard a ship thought to be unsinkable". So if you're gonna depict anyone negatively, have it be Ismay, not Andrews. Andrews was probably one of the only down to earth and realistic people in charge who cared about something other than greed and their career. Him and the many officers.

[@jemmaegner6062]

That's so interesting! Thanks for sharing!

[@F.R.E.D.D2986]

It took 2 hours and 40 mins for the ship to sink

[@thelonemaiden]

hi. an other youtube post says it was jp morgan resisting and fighting him. is this person jpm, then? thanks for posting.

[@jwm5165]

​@@thelonemaiden JP Morgan financed the white star line

[@shaynewheeler9249]

😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@crypticgt316]

Him: *"Guys Don't Worry This Ship Cant Possibly Sink :D"* Water: *"Sup My Niggaaaaa"* Him: *"Oh...."*

[@TTTTCJGKS]

These guys were so overconfident, they didn’t bother walking to the bow to notice that the water was getting evercloser to their bodies. Must’ve been that stiff breeze amiright?

[@shaynewheeler9249]

🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@cringeworthyhumans160]

I thought they put out the flame... Turns out it was on fire for the entire journey

[@LoneWolf051]

Put out on the 13th

[@abirch515]

Well Bruh ITS MARSHMALLOW TIME!

[@timtnr.6177]

@@abirch515 maybe, but then cool down time on the 14th🚴‍♂️

[@timtnr.6177]

@@abirch515 Ironically, the coal fire likely kept Titanic afloat longer. The firemen emptied the coal bunkers from the Starboard side of Titanic causing her to flood more evenly, if the coal fire had not started, Titanic would have dramatically listed to Starboard from the weight of the coal in the Starboard coal bunker, it would have resulted in Titanic filling with water and pulled down more rapidly from the weight of the coal and water, Titanic would have likely sank in a matter of minutes.

[@shaynewheeler9249]

Coal fired steamship Titanic

[@joshualoynes7408]

Coal bunker fires were extremely common knowledge, that’s why it was dismissed.

[@dodgeramsport01]

world of retro Really? So how did they start?

[@brandonstevens5628]

@@dodgeramsport01 uh maybe be because coal burns really easily and friction

[@Xox0.cathyyy]

What did the titanic actually sink bc i watched a video about a boat worker saying it was an olypmpic boat as his last words 🤡

[@msidc1238]

@@Xox0.cathyyy Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@Sweeptoken]

True, but how many ships that had bunker fires also ran into an iceburg?

[@spencers5736]

good news. the fires out

[@tjrudy5708]

Underliked comment. Pure gold 😂😂😂

[@alaskantundrawolf8831]

Classic. Reminds me of "Well, other than that Mrs. Kennedy, how was the parade?"

[@msidc1238]

Well it was out before the ship even hit the iceberg.

[@doggbone294]

😂 That's cold

[@oldtimer4791]

​@doggbone294, the comment or the iceberg?😂

[@LoneWolf051]

The documentary fails to tell us that the fire never made contact with the hull since Fireman Barrett explained at the NYC inquiries that the firemen moved the mounds of coal inboard by a few feet, thus it was a non-issue it also fails to tell us that the "dark" spots in the picture is actually freshly applied black paint, and that there are other photos showing numerous other "dark" spots over the hull (fresh paint) and it also fails to tell us that the dark spot in the photo isnt anywhere near where the fire was located....I dont get the purpose of this video , why does it exist? should be on sci fi channel

[@LoneWolf051]

@REAL ESTATE LANCE NETWORK yes and the coal left behind was not burning, thus a non issue

[@mcfcDJ51]

it’s literally the smithsonian. it’s their job to hide the truth. the real culprits are the jesuits who set the whole thing up from the beginning. most of the ppl on board were against the Jesuit ideals at that time and were all murdered that day thanks to the captain who was on board with it. He sacrificed himself for their greater cause.

[@LoneWolf051]

@@mcfcDJ51 lol

[@jordan4441]

This video was made to confuse people trying to research the truth of what happened and why the titanic was intentionally sunk

[@shaynewheeler9249]

😢😢

[@SouthPark333Gaming]

That's actually quite interesting

[@MikeGill87]

Yep, never heard this one. Quite interesting. Well, if nothing else, White Star at least found a way to put out just about any fire in coal storage on ships this big...

[@LoneWolf051]

though the fire never made contact with the hull, and it was put out by the 13th

[@TLO129]

Kevin Collver facts...

[@msidc1238]

@@gizzy_mobile Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@diamondstrike9086]

It’s fake don’t believe it

[@mnichy888]

Thinking about those actors gives me the giggles

[@Odysseus11.134]

Matthew Nichiporuk same

[@kitrichardson2165]

Exactly they’re all flaccid and chubby and people who shovel coal all day for a living you’re not gonna be in that kind of physical condition it was a comical juxtaposition.

[@shaunbrown85]

That’s not right. 1-fire in a coal bunker of a Victorian steamer was as normal as a tail strike of an aeroplane on take off. 2-Thomas Andrews knew that the watertight compartments weren’t topped off, which is why he knew that if the 5th compartment had ANY water in it with flooding on the 1st four too then the weight of that water would pour over the tops of the bulkheads. That is what he told the captain after assessing and seeing 5 compartments flooding.

[@priscillaribeiro1988]

Only comment that makes sense on this video

[@AbdulHameed-bw4cg]

So, it means Titanic was set on fire from very beginning of its voyage.

[@uncoveredtruth2088]

Abdul Hameed it was basically on fire before it even started the voyage look at 0:58 You can see the darkened hull, which is damage from the fire

[@LoneWolf051]

gene cao nope, thats fresh paint you are looking at...the fire wasnt even near that part of the ship, it was 60 feet back and 15 feet below the waterline the fire never made contact with the hull, and was put out before the ship left Southampton

[@TLO129]

Kevin Collver actually no. That’s a lease flare. After the two photos shown are taken, the photographer changes lenses and it not in the third the photo

[@aviationlover3613]

@@LoneWolf051 Correction: The fire was put out in the 3rd day of the voyage with shift of coal from starboard coal bunker to the port and middle coal bunkers wich caused a 3° list to the port

[@LoneWolf051]

@@aviationlover3613 correct, Friday I believe is when Fireman Fred Barrett confirmed it was out

[@adrianapartida5888]

Who can't wait when Titanic honor and glory to be finished

[@yolk6942]

It's in development since 1 year

[@shaynewheeler9249]

😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@Ben-bb7mi]

This is completely false, Andrews knew the ship was doomed as soon as he saw that 6 compartments were opened to seawater. The pumps were working but he knew the math and knew that the rate of flooding was much greater than pumps could keep up with. It's shameful that Smithsonian would put this out when everyone who has studied the history of Titanic knows better. Titanic was built to survive multiple scenarios that included the front 4 compartments being flooded, 3 of the first 5, or any of the 2 mid compartments. She could not survive her six forward compartments flooded and that is precisely the damage caused when the berg punctured her starboard side.

[@davidmanley9437]

It was said in some instances that it was finally extinguished approximately 30 minutes b4 the impact it was finally out ,but the super heated metal and the ice cold water made the sinking actually happen

[@ChrisCapoccia]

would have been good to actually comment on how the fire could have been relevant to structural strength and whether it was actually a bigger contributor to the situation than backwards steering or incorrect rivets

[@LoneWolf051]

the whole video is pointless since the fire never made contact with the hull, since the mounds of coal in boiler room #6 were moved inboard a few feet, and that the fire was put out before the ship left Southampton

[@yaboilemonboi5223]

Wait what do you mean backwards steering?

[@timtnr.6177]

@@yaboilemonboi5223 reversing the engines. James Cameron's Titanic movie shows First Officer Murdoch order Full Stop, then Full Astern. This order in the movie was to "dramatize" the situation, however on April 14th, 1912 Full Stop was ordered per the protocol. Full astern was never ordered. The engines barely slowed down 30 seconds Titanic struck the iceberg, in fact several maneuvers were made as a test with the Olympic, Titanic's sister ship shortly after the disaster using a fake iceberg. Every maneuver with the Olympic failed to avert a collision within the close proximity and speed Titanic was traveling right before the collision. So many theories and false hopes people have came up with over the years, in a nutshell the collision was unavoidable, Olympic proved this with the tests of maneuvers to try to recreate the incident with Titanic. The only way they could have avoided the collision was to STOP overnight and resume in the morning when the icebergs were visible. However it was commonplace in 1912 to steam full speed through dangerous waters. Although the inquiry affixed blame on the officers and crew, the officers and crew were following orders of the protocol of the outdated British board of trade regulations. The officers were not necessarily negligent, the outdated guidelines which were revised after the disaster is ultimately where the issues came into play. The officers and crew did their best to avoid any danger.

[@TheRealRusDaddy]

@@LoneWolf051 you do realize the heat didnt just stop warping the metal walls it was confined in just because they shifted it a few feet back

[@nickelmickel4170]

Fun fact,the swimming pool is still full after all these years.

[@windshearahead7012]

It’s not full with fresh water, so it’s technically it’s empty

[@devinpetersen2387]

So does this mean that the layers to keep the water out were weakened by the fire and gave? Or that too much water formed in the hull and the ship became top heavy? It would be interesting to inspect the damaged area

[@gmcclanahan7145]

NO TIS VIDIO IS STOPID

[@shaynewheeler9249]

😢😢😢

[@shaynewheeler9249]

😢😢😢

[@samy5907]

do you think it's still on fire?

[@Lumina_Solaris]

Mate, this comment is underrated. It made me grin.

[@Dark_Matter2]

Yes 😳

[@pC3390-c1w]

Probably not it’s been under water for 100 years

[@PedroPauloAmorim]

@@Lumina_Solaris *underwater

[@shaynewheeler9249]

Titanic

[@rebeldog5567]

Well, I tell you what, it quickly got put out when all that cold seawater hit it.. Lol !!

[@musicnfts]

The titanic was going to sink and it was a certainty so they intentionally crashed against an ice berg as a cover up?

[@eijmert]

@hellogoodbye40 ofc. Is earth flat too?

[@eijmert]

@hellogoodbye40 ofc. Is earth flat too?

[@jerkerhernback9558]

Its a ridicuolus theory

[@tookahnumba260]

Nah they crashed the Olympic for insurance money because they couldn't afford to repair it.

[@msidc1238]

@@tookahnumba260 Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@joebloe4461]

They crashed it into an iceberg so the captain wouldn't find out they were smoking a blunt in the coal storage room.

[@msidc1238]

Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@timtnr.6177]

That is absolutely absurd and untrue. People are here for factual comments not jokes JOE BLOE

[@paulrowland4371]

If there was a massive fire raging for a long period. How comes no smoke was noticed.

[@dovetonsturdee7033]

More to the point, how is it that none of Titanic's 27 engineers and boilermakers, her 13 leading firemen, or her 163 stokers, noticed it? Or, if they did, didn't think to tell Captain Smith? Or if they did, why would Smith even sail? The whole idea of a huge, out of control, fire, is simply idiotic.

[@alexandert696]

there was more than enough room for 2 peps in that piece of wood..

[@andrewmac5494]

Perhaps the surface area of the wooden door or object fit the requirements of 2 ppl but I doubt it would have been buoyant enough to keep their combined weight a float.

[@torpedo996]

Next thing you know people will say the first nuke was detonated on the Titanic. Or something like that.

[@F.R.E.D.D2986]

Andrews never said she would survive, the moment he saw the water, he said, it was a certainty that she would sink

[@vivekt.2038]

Such Business company R only Cares about their Fame, Reputation & Money ,not The Safety of the People .

[@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1]

This sounds dubious. I had always saw Andrews as a practical man who knew full well the dangers facing his ship

[@timtnr.6177]

Exactly. Thomas Andrews WAS a practical man. The inquiry affixed blame to him, when outright the Outdated British board of trade regulations did not mandate any more lifeboats. Half of what was required was in place, however over the mandatory regulations of 1912. Thomas Andrews exceeded the British board of trade regulations of 1912. The damage to Titanic's hull was extra ordinary, it was a freak accident, far from expected to rupture 6 water tight compartments. The design was changed and water tight bulkheads were extended higher along with a double skin or hull plating on the Britannic the 3rd Olympic class liner to be constructed. Even when Britannic hit a mine, it sank much more rapidly than Titanic. Fortunately of the 1,100 on board, there were only around 30 casualties

[@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1]

There was also a coal strike going on in Wales at the time

[@Flashy001]

Did anyone get an ad about the titanic before watching??

[@adityanayak4506]

But it was put out hours before the collision

[@phishENchimps]

oh my, what a twist

[@shelleynobleart]

Never heard this before. Is it true?

[@Titanic_401]

No

[@AManWith_NoName]

Yes acually it was, the fire weakend a sizable section of the Titanic's Hull, if you look at pictures from the Titanic before setting sail you can even see a darkened section of hall where the fire weakend it

[@alyssawilson8781]

NobleDesignMedia yes

[@LoneWolf051]

a man with no name the fire was put out by the 13th, and the mounds of coal which contained the burning embers was moved inboard a few feet away from the hull, so there was never any contact at all. later the surrounding mounds of coal were moved from starboard side to port, to be double safe should the fire reignite, which is why Titanic had a 3 degree port list the entire voyage. Fireman Fred Barrett testified all of this at the NYC hearings after the sinking....thats why this story was tossed out 105 years ago...it was a dead end PS. that "dark" section of hull in the photo is just fresh paint, other pictures show numerous other dark sections throughout the hull....plus that section isnt anywhere near where the fire wouldve been located.....have a good day

[@Titanic_401]

The marks on the photos don't even line up with where the bunker was. (www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/community/attachments/coalhull-png.2295/) Do some actual research and don't believe what a documentary says because they don't have to tell the truth and can just make things up.

[@akshat20021996]

But there was enough room for Jack..... Rose was evil

[@ThePeAcElOvEaNdBuBbL]

There's also the debate that Jack decided not to get back on and Rose just did what she was told

[@gregorykimishii4953]

The iceberg may've put the fire out when the Titanic collided,so the Captain didn't find out.

[@stopitskiiiuuup4006]

THEY ARE LYING THERE WAS NO FIRE!!! THE PEOPLE ON THAT SHIP WAS MURDERED!

[@Commandobreezy]

@@stopitskiiiuuup4006 how?

[@msidc1238]

No. The fire was out at that point. And coal fires were somewhat common back then.

[@tommysamojlowitsch7028]

This is all bull crap the ice berg did enough damage Thomas Andrews knew she was doomed once boiler room 5 went under

[@allyvandergaast8746]

Andrews didn't say everything would be fine. He said it was a qoute "mathematical certainty" that the ship would sink and even urged passagers to put on layers and prepare to board a lifeboat. Neither Thomas Andrews( the chief designer) nor Joseph Bell( the chief engineer) said that Titanic was "unsinkable" that was a creation propagrated by the press and the White star line. Andrews himself once said that RMS Titanic was practically unsinkable. But to my knowledge non of the designers believed she truly unsinkable. Though plenty of the passengers did . Something that likely added to the death count as many didn't actually believe the ship was sinking and refused to get in the lifeboats. In regards to the bunker fires I believe they where relatively common back in 1912. So ships were likely built with certain immunities. But even if the fire did weaken the hull, it probably wouldn't have been enough to sink the RMS Titanic without the added stress of the collision with the iceberg. So it could possibly be seen as a contributing factor but I don't believe it was the main cause. Keep in mind that I am a layperson at this juncture. I am not a engineer nor do I have any experience working on or designing ships and I also have no formal or rigorous education in this matter or anything similar. This is simple my logical conclusion based on my best guesses and everything else I know about the Titanic disaster.

[@empresslihuicircanow507]

Wait till Spammals hears about this!.... Again!

[@davenllyodn.ignacio3265]

Titanic was sunk caused by fire weakening Titanic's hull

[@msidc1238]

A small smoldering fire can't melt steel. Let alone almost 300 ft. of it.

[@banditido8096]

There was room on that debris Rose!!!

[@erosjohndelossantos8481]

The titanic was pretty lit 🔥 🔥 🔥

[@scrapperpun5553]

I give that joke a glowing review. It was one hull of a fire.

[@msyluk]

Bit like the Thermite on 9/11

[@ridstanejimmy]

What's this " high-impact collision like the one that sunk her"? Passengers reported a gentle check to the ship's forward motion like the engines stopping and going astern. There was no mention of a lurch to port as would be felt by everyone aboard if a collision with a massive iceberg had occurred as fabled. 🤔

[@franjoberos2695]

the titanic had a lot of damaged areas .. that why ship sink .. not because fire

[@luqmanmohamed4352]

After they see a fire it says it's brighter here

[@JoeLikesTrains]

its just a smudge on the lens! the location where people see the shadow is on the deck where the swimming pool is!

[@flyeaglesflyyy]

What does this have anything to do with an iceberg being the culprit in the sinking of the ship?

[@49ersawesomeness]

The bunker is approximately where the ship broke in two

[@rogersstinson4019]

Fresh_doggo then the bow would have come off

[@msidc1238]

No it isn't.

[@stephenbyrne2170]

Woah dude! Are you saying, her demise was..... *FLAME??????*

[@Louisiana_Levitator06]

Wow. Didn’t even know that.

[@EW00AW04]

If that fire hadn’t of started in the fifth compartment of the Titanic, the ship wouldn’t have sunk. Simple as

[@alyssathecat4223]

I believe that

[@carlwheezer3353]

No. If the iceberg had not hit the fifth compartment, she would not have sunk. Simple. Now you may ask “how can iceberg inflict much damage”, remember, she was going almost full speed to the iceberg, hitting 5 compartments with the hull only being 1.875 cm thick

[@aeoe665]

Well now you just made a titanic a lovely ship to a creepy pasta great going

[@chairshoe81]

ancient aliens

[@shahimagesyt]

@Mycel you just had to mention Trump didn't you.

[@shahimagesyt]

@Mycel Not to get to politically deep but what lies has he made?

[@timtnr.6177]

This is NOT a goofy debate about Trump or aliens. This is about Titanic. Go to star wars or a political debate. You have the wrong department

[@chairshoe81]

@@timtnr.6177 5 yr old comment

[@timtnr.6177]

@@chairshoe81 it is irrelevant to debate about the president or aliens, when this is in regards to Titanic

[@chrxs.d406]

Imagine. If. It. Was. Actually. An. *Artillery only.* Fire.

[@roswallbethancourt4083]

You guys are super fun but can you make 20

[@jenniferblanchard399]

Why did no one try to put the fire out? Surely someone must have known about the fire..

[@Tronter6000]

*At least the fire is out now*

[@rogersstinson4019]

Yeah they put it out 2 days before she sank, the water just made shoor it it wouldn’t happen again.

[@timtnr.6177]

WOW, that is very kind of you to say, sheesh

[@glywnniswells9480]

This right here could change history

[@MrOramato]

could they have had and emergency hatch at the bottom of each bunker to allow an instant dumping of that bunker ? Or would that steam resulting from that much burning coal hitting the ocean acted like a bomb ?

[@Historymaker-2001]

no, but that would have flooded the coal bunker and caused the bunker wall to collapse. This is exactly what happened in the boiler room 5 forward coal bunker. After boiler room 6 filled, including it's aft coal bunker, water started spilling over the watertight bulkhead into the boiler room 5 forward coal bunker. the thing is, unlike the bulkheads, the bunker walls separating them from their boiler rooms were not designed to be able to withstand the weight of the water. Eventually, the wall collapsed, and allowed a torrent of water into the boiler room.

[@jamochashake57]

well, where there is fire there should be smoke. lots of smoke if it is coal

[@okhayden805]

Southampton where I live

[@duncanedwards7840]

Scummer! 🙂

[@intensity.density2208]

Plausible. The iceberg could have been a cover up. Or if it did collide with the iceberg, the fire would have weakened the ship. I also have a thought that the fire would have heated the steel on the underside of the ship. Hot steel and cold water don't react well.

[@msidc1238]

The fire was out before the ship hit the iceberg. Also coal fires were common back then.

[@airaction6423]

​@@msidc1238what if there was no iceberg. Nobody saw it

[@msidc1238]

@@airaction6423 That's a complete lie. There were plenty of survivors that saw it.

[@airaction6423]

@@msidc1238 lol. None

[@msidc1238]

@@airaction6423 Did you look for testimonies that mention the iceberg?

[@dwight.k.schrute2232]

Why was the fire oh F deck shouldn't be in boiler room number 5

[@Ellipsard]

Thomas andrewd didnt say that

[@texsion]

So instead of putting out the fire at the ports they let it keep going......ok seems legit

[@burdizdawurd1516Official]

Ya see, the fire was all a rouse to begin with, since the Titanic never sank. The Britannic sank in an insurance scam to get rid of the ship. It's my favorite conspiracy theory, since the three ships in the class were so similar it was easy to flip around a few name plates.

[@arachnonixon]

it wasn't the Britannic that the Titanic was switched with, it was the Olympic

[@arachnonixon]

Lexington productions ok, so you've obviously not researched the subject & just outright dismiss it as a conspiracy theory because you're conditioned to. I have researched it, thoroughly. I have so much information to back up my claim it would blow your mind, & you have literally nothing to support your version beyond it being the official story.

[@arachnonixon]

exactly what I thought. You watched the documentaries (which I agree, present a lot of outright crap), but have you actually researched it on your own? I blindly believe nothing. I went into it objectively, & after researching it concluded that there are far too many anomalies that don't add up unless the ships were switched

[@LoneWolf051]

Im the only one who actually provided verified proof

[@user-ps4mw5om4j]

From a single website which is not even credible? Where did you even get your degree? The university of assumptions? PUHLEASE

[@lifeofadavey]

Don't you mean the Olympic

[@msidc1238]

That theory has been debunked countless times.

[@TheTitanic448]

Titanic. He lied. I did. Sink. Iceberg. That’s. True. Titanic. ..?

[@maxiking1859]

What is "tytoń", "tytan", "tytan", "tytan", "Tytan"?

[@electronrecycler1072]

JP Morgan sunk the ship, this was the day the world changed forever, and very few people will ever even know

[@msidc1238]

Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@airaction6423]

There was no iceberg

[@dovetonsturdee7033]

So, all those who reported one were victims of a mass hallucination, were they?

[@airaction6423]

@@dovetonsturdee7033 nobody reported anything. It was a lie. There was just a photo of an iceberg previously made from another ship that was published years later

[@dovetonsturdee7033]

@@airaction6423 You obviously haven't read the accounts given by many survivors. Presumably you simply couldn't be bothered?

[@In_The_Base]

@@dovetonsturdee7033don’t argue with him their a conspiracy theorist they have less intelligence than a toaster

[@dovetonsturdee7033]

@@In_The_Base How dare you insult my toaster. Next you will be saying that my kettle is not a Chess Grand Master!

[@dovetonsturdee7033]

Has the Smithsonian degenerated to such an extent that it would give this nonsense house room? How depressing.

[@minecraftlolguy6869]

I don't believe u

[@Abthagod]

Hated the ending...

[@leinaddragyn717]

THATS THE REAL TRUETH ... THIS HOW IT ACUTALLY HAPPEND!

[@roswallbethancourt4083]

Videos of airplane crash

[@princesssmileyface91]

I don’t think we will ever know the real truth, I have heard so many different versions, like, the company planned all this for insurance policy and everything went side ways, the company switched out the Titanic for Olympic and no one would notice, now it’s because of a fire and an Iceberg. It’s one of those things that is mysterious on what actually went wrong. Thomas Andrew’s knew it would sink after boiler room 5, he probably said all that to keep people from freaking out.

[@msidc1238]

It was an iceberg. End of statment.

[@Full_Otto_Bismarck]

Soiled the good name of the Smithsonian putting this tin foil nonsense on their channel.

[@calvinnguyen7059]

If i was the architect building the titanic and it caught fire i would rebuilt it so that it wouldn't cause further trouble

[@andersonwalsh5876]

What!?

[@abhishekdas4612]

Damn

[@billdavide94]

This is what

[@kofi4759]

Now how is this relevant? What a div

[@NeverWinter0113]

Complete utter BS

[@outsidetesseract6389]

federal reserve sank the titanic

[@LoneWolf051]

[@msidc1238]

Don't believe everything you see on the internet.

[@outsidetesseract6389]

@@msidc1238 Don't believe everything you are taught in school.

[@msidc1238]

@@outsidetesseract6389 Alright give me evidence that Straus, Guggenheim and Astor were actually against the federal reserve.

[@outsidetesseract6389]

@@msidc1238 the titanic had many people who opposed the federal reserve, and it was established a year after the titanic sank.

[@Hyperr0209]

12th !

[@tomitstube]

whaaaaa?

[@kanyewestenthusiast394]

Wow

[@mimoslavija]

No.

[@aerofiles5044]

woa

[@thomasfuller5932]

I expect better from Smithsonian

[@ziongabwynndelapaz1883]

The titanic never sank. That was the last words of someone in the ship. The creator of that ship actually has 2 Boats The "Olympic" And The "Titanic" The creator of the boat knew it was gonna sink so he put the olympic on board instead of the titanic and the movie should be called The Olympic

[@DrSMILE-xc1dp]

I know you came from TikTok

[@msidc1238]

Don't believe everything you see on the internet. Especially that disgusting platform called Tik Tok.

[@holyfeline715]

They had different interiors

[@hesgotamotor8288]

Liiiiiiiiieeeeeeees!!!!!

[@FBI-tn9kw]

51th comment

[@corymitchell8751]

St not th

[@Qwertyuiop-jw9ws]

Second

[@bennytherollinstoner1932]

Olympic not titanic!!!

[@holyfeline715]

They did not switch they had different interiors and they would have needed to silence a lot of people

[@gamecentrehd2552]

First

[@Guru]

Wow