The Death of a King - Charles I - Elizabeth I - Full Movie in French (War, Historical) - HD

[@thegreatselkie6009]

Any film with Tim Roth is worth watching.

[@gerryhouska2859]

I almost didn't watch as it is subtitled "in French" and my rheumy old eyes get sore with subtitles. Thank dog it is in English and most enjoyable.

[@CatonaWall175]

You can switch off the subtitles using the Settings.

[@dreamersparadise919]

I just realised there are so many options in the captions. Including Bengali. I wonder how the dialogues will be said in my mother tongue!

[@TayebOk]

C' est dur de juger a notre époque les les hommes d' une révolution. Merci pour le partage.

[@cmoiquevlabuibui2312]

Merci ,trés bon film historique.

[@FRANKTHRING1]

An intelligent historical movie that was sadly a box office failure. Its leads, Scott and Roth, don`t look much like Fairfax and Cromwell but act very well. If you really want to see King Charles I on screen look no further than Sir Alec Guinness`s performance in :Cromwell", a fine tuned portrayal that is uncannily accurate.

[@Kirkee7]

Too right, they don't much look like Fairfax and certainly not like Cromwell. One cannot understand or separate Cromwell from his Biblical convictions.

[@Sonny-m1f]

Amen

[@ninkbscott]

Old film but a classic 😊

[@yvanguillerault9298]

J'adore Tim Roth, ,merci pour le film.

[@franciscoarzaga4384]

Thank you for this fantastic movie , more historical movies pls

[@desstanbridge8283]

Absolutely excellent historical movie. I'm very happy to learn Fairfax lived to a ripe old age and did much for York.

[@francoisparent5996]

Bon film. Je suis satisfait, un film bon film sur l'histoire.

[@gringoquenocomecuy]

Excellent. Helps you understand "divine right of kings."

[@yomama8873]

Thank you 🤩🤩💖

[@mrobo9037]

Loved the film 👏👏👏

[@MrBrutal33]

Charles 1st has nothing to do with Elizabeth 1st! Two different royal houses and 30 years apart

[@MrBrutal33]

Having just watched this, its a bag of crap historically...the trial took 10 days and Charles was only present for the charges being read out...Cromwell did not give a speech outside the Banqueting House and was not elected Protector until 1653...there was no assassination attempt at his investiture etc. etc.

[@bevmcmaster8976]

@@MrBrutal33 You are right this was crap. Its a sad waste because the sets, production values etc were good & Tim Roth is a great actor IMO. I am also not sure Cromwell was as homicidal as this movie makes out although our Irish friends may disagree LOL.

[@Dishfire101]

Yes, the House of Stuart (Scottish) and the House of Tudor (Welsh) then again King James 6th of Scots took over England in 1603!

[@britishpatriot7386]

​@Dish😂😂😂fire101

[@dominiquedelattre8729]

merci pour film qui nous aide a mieux comprendre l'histoire ....

[@majorp7967]

Great movie❤❤

[@Normand27]

très beau film,merci beaucoup

[@nnekaokechukwu2138]

Wonderful movie. I enjoyed watching it. The best

[@jeanlucpersicot1685]

excellent film , merci beaucoup./

[@armellesauvetre5528]

Très belle page d'histoire

[@coffee1940.]

Purely entertainment but I love history! 84 yrs old and I want to see our country in a better place. I believe a County is a Republic like Rome. England should never let the Royals back after Charles 1 was gone.the Republic of England sounds good.😮

[@RainorFalco-hr3qd]

The Roman empire was better than the Republic and its not even close.

[@Valhalla88888]

James 6th of Scotland tookover England in 1603 Charles 1 was the son of King James and charles 1st had a son called Charles 2nd❤

[@nnekaokechukwu2138]

I love this movie so much that am watching it for the second time

[@hamidlarabi8401]

un très bon film et une très belle histoire

[@peterderidder9922]

Verry good filmed ! ! ! those where crazy times

[@TheDfarhie]

an awesome period piece that fills in a lot of the "glossed over" back story of Cromwell (Richard Harris).

[@Richard-me2pq]

Charles I , file a FOIA request with the House of Parliament, do not answer any questions, do not consent to a search of your person or the royal Treasury, appeal your case to higher court!

[@thaliafranco6560]

sthanks!! ILOVE 😊

[@ElColOmbiAnO-ds6rm]

Hello 😊

[@garymcaleer6112]

A most powerful introduction. I will see if it agrees with the Great Reformers whose blood paved the way for liberty today.

[@matapomaga4523]

Film dobrze zrealizowany. A tak na marginesie: król Karol I nie był wysokim mężczyzną, jak aktor go grający. W rzeczywistości król miał 163 cm. wzrostu i był najniższym królem w dziejach Anglii i Szkocji. To gwoli faktu historycznego. My, Polacy też mieliśmy małego króla, zwał się Władysław Łokietek z dynastii Piastów. Był jeszcze niższy. Też jedyny w swoim rodzaju.

[@granvillehilton3078]

What a good movie.

[@sophieverneret]

Très bon film historique, je recommande ❤

[@Guest-li8fd]

As history this is conjecture apart from the basic facts of Charles I execution, the Protectorate and the existence of the principal characters. This would not matter so much had the dialogue been crisp and meaningful, but it wasn't. Cromwell has all the charisma of a schoolmaster who's lost control of his class. Anne Fairfax (about which next to nothing is known, but beautiful she wasn't!) had no direct contact with Charles I beyond being removed from the gallery at his trial for shouting 'It's a lie!". Olivia Williams, the actress who plays her would have been more suited to a Jane-Austen novel (she played Jane Fairfax, no relative, in Emma!). Fairfax, historically, was instrumental in restoring the monarchy under Charles II, the executed king's son, after the death of Cromwell. The horrors of war and human nature come in for the usual handwringing sentimentality. In trying to be history, romance, drama and a contemporary commentary on human nature the film completely loses its way. It has been rightfully condemned to the dustbin.

[@jeremymerrifield7244]

But you just watched it, do you live in a dustbin ?

[@RIKP-gp8iq]

Roi décapité par un homme ambitieux et fourbe !!! Bon film !!!

[@mikaeloy7342]

Merci pour le spoil 😞

[@ColinGlass-v9x]

🇬🇧 I Like this film it gives an accurate😢 historical account of the events that actually to place in historey between Oliver Cromwell And King Charles great performances and direction great movie

[@britishpatriot7386]

😂😂😂 accurate my arse. Do you know history????

[@mariaramillano6665]

Thank you

[@lystamukemba2375]

Extraordinnaire film😢

[@Mickday2023]

Tim Roth at young age and Australian actress forgot her name. Interesting film.

[@kyleolsen6938]

What was a great film

[@leonie563]

Makes me want to watch Rob Roy again

[@Sonny-m1f]

He was a real bastard in that one. I wish it were on KZbin like this.

[@ElColOmbiAnO-ds6rm]

Protestants..puis révolutionnaire..puis républicains.. 😢 Dieu puisse il avoir pitié de leur âme 🙏❤️🕊️⛪🇨🇵🌹 gloire as Dieu au plus haut des cieux !❤ Je prie pour que la sainte Vierge Marie vous vienne en aide ! 😊❤🙏🇨🇵⛪🕊️❤️

[@yvesgauthier2324]

Je présume que vous êtes encore de la secte romaine? De là votre agression mariolatrique contre les chrétiens.

[@Simonj2109]

So your God is better than their's a argument as backward and old as time. And what about the guillotine and Napoleon. The 🇫🇷 should not lecture anyone. 😅😂😅

[@Tid28]

Puis Franc-Maçon….

[@xavierandenmatten3287]

😂🤣😂

[@davidvandereecken1627]

Marie !!! ..... Vierge ??? ...😮😮😮 On parle bien de la même ? 🤣🤣🤣 Conneries de religion. -🖕

[@Jlopez2207]

She is a very beautiful lady

[@ntphone2280]

It looks so good movie😇🤝👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻❤️🫂🙏🏻

[@SuperPromethee]

for my country thailand or former siam, the king and always controlled their subjects or lords...because the king himself was always former lord who had the great wealth and men power...

[@HO-bndk]

This is precisely one of the things that the people were fighting against in the civil wars. British people know that a king's rule has limits.

[@permaveg]

In terms of historical accuracy, it's all over the place.

[@connormurphy7684]

Fantasy but its Got Tim Roth in it which makes it ok😂❤

[@ntphone2280]

🙏🏻thank you🫂👍🏻🤝😇

[@willdatsun]

why the bad aspect ratio?

[@BCBC1955]

Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603, so what has that got to do with the description of the movie, i.e., Charles I Elizabeth I.

[@robertd.carver6240]

Why is Elizabeth I even mentioned in the logline? This film concerns people and events which occurred more than 50 years after her death! Otherwise an excellent film.

[@daniellejoseph3086]

Le film n est pas en français?

[@jime9257]

I hate to say this but I think the Brits need to revisit their past and look up this time in history? To see what Starmen is doing in the name of Parliament today betrays all of England, and he needs to be removed?

[@teresabarbieri3894]

Was going to say the same thing.

[@joaquimguilherme7591]

Bom filme.

[@mihalachemihaela4059]

Vă rugăm și traducerea în limba română !!!!

[@milavaldez6335]

Nice movie❤❤

[@CharmaineNel-t4n]

A great movie

[@charliecharlien9716]

Vive le Roy de France 👑

[@francoisbeau.regard6947]

Tres bon film d histoire .

[@Sadat_mousa]

can you guys explain to us how they manage to drag Jesus to the Cross then accused the Roman?

[@16marner]

Yes I can, from a purely historical perspective, no one dragged Jesus to the cross but the Romans. It Roman law he was convicted for-sedition. Sedition was the only crime for which crucifixion could be used under Roman law. Do you really think Rome would let their subjugated peoples carry out Roman matters of law? It’s BS is what I’m saying. He was found guilty of sedition and crucified, end of story. In fact this is the one thing about Jesus that we actually have a historic record for. Other than that he is whatever anyone wants to imagine him to be.

[@CésarRubenPequeñopequeño]

Sorry in spanish, please, thank You 😢

[@Sonny-m1f]

Tu el hombre! Viva Cristo Rey!!!

[@williaminavanbottle9297]

An hour and thirty four minutes? Where is the rest?

[@Mediatech492]

It's a simple concept. All Englishmen are subject to English law. If the King is an Englishman he is therefore subject to English law. If he is not subject to the law, he cannot have any legal claim to kingship.

[@Sonny-m1f]

Then how did we get Charles the II. Cromwell was a tyrant. The parliament righted it's wrong with the restoration. Then re fouled it with the "inglorious" revolution. Charles the first was King by God's will. Regicide was committed to satisfy the fears of certain financial interests.

[@billarddanick5212]

Finalement les Français ne sont pas les seuls à avoir exécuter leur roi......

[@richardwest6358]

What do you mean - we did it before you !

[@sandrabrowne2350]

Let's not talk what Cromwell did in Ireland against the majority Catholic population the greatest land confiscation since Norman invasion leaving a legacy of bitterness for generations! Leave comments no censorship.

[@HO-bndk]

You're right, let's not talk about it. The royalist troops ravaged my city in 1644 and murdered and violated the townspeople, but I don't keep whining about it 500 years later!

[@wiseonwords]

@sandrabrowne2350 - It's a bit more complicated than that.

[@wor53lg50]

Lets not talk about portadown either...or the murky river Bann, we're i go to remember my lovely Ann... Who was defiled at the end of rebel spears...and buried in the sand..then one day on the Horizon did i see, a 100 or more ships coming to my land... And Cromwell lord protector of the realm, smiled and put a sword into my hand.... Off we marched to......

[@Richard-me2pq]

"Mommy? The playground is closed today! So, can we play on the corpse stack under the tree?"

[@harrydebastardeharris987]

Very Good,a gem

[@ZoonChenar-lw5hx]

Good film poor portrayal of Cromwell as a nervous and emotional wimp instead of cold, unemotional, supremely confident

[@monicajudithcatalanmunoz6275]

ME ENCANTAN LAS PELICULAS CON HISTORIA,DONDE SE REFLEJA LA CONSTANTE LUCHA POR LA LIVERTAD DE LOS PUEBLOS,DE REYES QUE SE CREIAN DIVINOS Y ERAN SIMPLES LADRONES Y ESCLAVIZADORES DEL SOBERANO.PERO INGLATERRA AMA A SUS DIOSES REYES,DE TODAS MANERAS ,HOY SIMBOLOS .PERO CON MAS DEMOCRACIA.

[@cinocage]

Scott and Tim together? I'm in.

[@Comfort2019]

I love the movie.

[@guybeaudin6627]

😂👍 excellent film comme dictateur moi aussi ça me fait penser à quelqu'un MaCrotte☺️🤣

[@patricespeiser7106]

Pauvre guignols de foire 🥳🥳🥳 et dégénéré du bulbe 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@litodito6424]

What has changed I told him I have, If one can not change oneself it is meaningless.

[@edjurist1578]

Nice movie.

[@Simonj2109]

How gullible was Anne and the Royalists that a king can do and take anything. England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 is a country of laws and better for it.

[@charliehaldir]

Great film, To Kill a King (2003)

[@paulthomas9271]

Oliver Cromwell wasn’t as bad as they are making out in this movie

[@vanmust]

Olivia Williams is a very good actress ....she is underemployed as far as I am concerned .....and being quite tall for a woman she should have been cast in more historical figure's roles...as for Rup.Everet sir Alec Guiness was a far better Charles I

[@Evlogite19]

I love all the actors in this film, but the casting is all wrong. Tim Roth is a fantastic actor, but he looks nothing like Cromwell. Now, someone I always thought would be just perfect for that role, since, unlike Roth, he actually bears a striking resemblance to the man, is none other than David Thewliss. And Rupert Everett is another wonderful actor with immense talent, but he isn’t right at all for the role of His Majesty King Charles I. Although, it is interesting to note that his maternal ancestors were royalists.

[@rosemaryallen2128]

Would whoever posted this kindly have the courtesy to include the cast list.

[@jeremymerrifield7244]

Google it

[@pascaljuigne8786]

super film mais beaucoup trop de pub

[@francoisbeau.regard6947]

Vrais pour les pub. Avant ils avaient pas de pubs

[@cristianoalmeida9716]

Alguém sabe me informar se esse filme é baseado em história real ?

[@ruibeto]

Sim aconteceu no sec xvii durante a guerra civil inglesa entre as forças parlamentares lideradas por Oliver Cormwell e monarquicas de Carlos I que acabou por ser executado.

[@sabbyd1832]

It sure is

[@mariomillanmartin6906]

Si , es real.

[@MK-nd2ij]

É sim senhor!

[@teresabarbieri3894]

​@@mariomillanmartin6906El solo hecho real en esta peli es que mataron al rey, lo demas de la peli es falsa.

[@yosefgabr]

وما الحياة الدنيا الا متاع الغرور

[@britishpatriot7386]

Whatever

[@teresabarbieri3894]

Chimes in the pedo worshipper.

[@martyconroy3786]

It's To Kill a King

[@geobel1669]

God save the King Charles II

[@cerberus6654]

Cromwell was NOT on the scaffold - looking like a pissed-off little Jew - when Charles was beheaded. This is just such a pastiche.

[@alcylon]

correct movie titel: to kill a king (2003). juse the prober titel!!!!

[@consequences5638]

Whether a film is "good" or "bad" is subjective. However I'm about half way through not knowing if I'll finish. It doesn't have to be historically accurate, could even be porn, but I suggest it should be more accurate. Neither mention of the Catholic v. Protestant schism which was a main motivator. E.g. Charles 1 Catholic wife and her influence, not mentioned at all. Nor European context like 100 Years War. Nor fact that Cromwell as a great soldier. Who really knew how to train and organise, especially Cavalry. Treated his men well. Which was "revolutionary", way ahead of his time. 10,000 cavalry might be very expensive to recreate. Yet if portrayed, and with the real honest schisms might help reveal some of the origins of freedoms enjoyed these days in UK, and to some extent in USA and erstwhile British Empire. (Which illegal boat migrants know all about, appear to clamour for, and are thus rewarded?). Perhaps BBC, M&S, etc., should do a remake and cast Charles 1 and or Oliver as black?

[@Derniere.Nouvelle-xe7kz]

Attendre 130 ans que les Anglais pousse les Français a décapiter leurs Roi (nuances)

[@irfanseventen6913]

bang please make the Madong seok movie, which is titled Ground Zero

[@Kirkee7]

So much nonsense in this film. It is really irritating. I guess all it has going for it is entertainment. No wonder it was a flop.

[@stewartantony8225]

Historically this is so bad it's an embarrassment

[@johnenekainuku9625]

Cromwell an Irish, should of stayed in Ireland 🇮🇪 was he colonized there, like some, certain of you?

[@britishpatriot7386]

To Kill a King name of the movie.

[@WhiteDeuth5384]

เมื่อไรคนทั้งโลกจะมีแต่ความรักให้กันแม้แตกต่างทางความเชื้อ❤😊🎉

[@KevinPierce-pu4bd]

This Cromwell fellow was quite a psycho.

[@assitaouattara1590]

❤❤❤❤

[@standsintherain1]

Watch Mehmed Fetihler Sultani

[@Baskerville22]

Why the "Charles I - Elizabeth I" in the title ? Elizabeth I died 22 years BEFORE Charles 1 became King. Tim Roth does not make a realistic Cromwell. He isn't helped in that role by the weak, shallow dialogue scripted for him.

[@wiseonwords]

@Baskerville22 - I fully agree with you on the implausible portrayal of Cromwell and the weak script! The 1970 film Cromwell was much better.

[@Dishfire101]

James King of Scots (Scotland) took over England in 1603 when Elizabeth 1st died in the same year, the Son of King James 6th of Scots was Charles 1st and his father died in 1625 his son died in 1649 ie 46 years before Elizabeth 1st died!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@johnphilipmalones1041]

❤

[@cretene1]

liked this a lot and thats from an irsh republican.

[@wor53lg50]

🎶Off we marched to drogheda, to Aston's guarded town. Together we stormed it with Cromwell at the helm, He screamed you butchers remember portadown... Im Cromwell lord protector of the realm,

[@yvonnedyer5371]

Good film, but let us not delude ourselves we are still being ruled covertly