Those were some of the best graphics I've seen in these educational videos. Really fantastic job guys.
@TheEngineeringHub6 ай бұрын
Thank you sir!🙏 I put in a bit more consideration into the color scheme and overall graphic design for this video. I am glad it didn't go un-noticed.
@hafeeznoormohamed12596 ай бұрын
Amazing summary. Ive taken full classes that couldnt explain this so well as it's done here in just 10 minutes!
@nikevisor546 ай бұрын
Always great to get another lesson after school
@bruce-le-smith6 ай бұрын
The printed props made it really easy to visualize and understand the math, thanks!
@EMohamedNaiemАй бұрын
10 years ago when i was in the college , i always dream about a channel like this , finally !
@rakenteidenmekaniikkaa26 күн бұрын
You have put a great effort in making these things visual. I appreciate it a lot. I am teaching structural engineers-to-be and I have always found the visualization the hardest part. The calculations are easy after one understands the phenomena. Your videos seem to be very down-to-earth in explaining things. I will definitely recommend your videos for my student.
@TheEngineeringHub26 күн бұрын
Great, thank you! I hope your students find them useful!
@samuelmuentes6 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation and skillfully crafted visuals. Thank you!
@465maltbie6 ай бұрын
Great way to visualize this, thanks for sharing. Charles
@233kosta5 ай бұрын
*a LOOSE bolt. Correctly tightened bolts are always in tension until the joint fails. A locating pin would have been a better example.
@ddarkjared5 ай бұрын
I would recommend you add a stiffener to the load application location and/or secure the wood to both the bottom and top flange. This should garauntee you see the effects on the section globally rather than locally
@billynomates9206 ай бұрын
ibd to the 4 all i can remember. long long time ago. great video!
@rjserra55355 ай бұрын
Very good presentation. Next time, choose a physical model that has a smaller cross section and a greater length. Yo will get more deflection before failure and a better visualization of the deformation of the beam as you apply the test load.
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
Yes, great feedback, thank you 🙏
@foobargorch6 ай бұрын
doesn't the local failure potentially confound the 15% difference?
@MFcitrous6 ай бұрын
Steel gains strength in tension so the torsional effects are often self defeating in a sense. You can't 3d print a 'model' of a W beam and think that it will behave even remotely the same as quality steel. I subbed b/c your engineering math is very on point, but there are also large practical misses that I also see daily in stamped engineering out in the wild. Legally speaking I'm not an engineer; I merely present them with solutions to stamp.
@m.50516 ай бұрын
What are you even talking about? I know 100% that you've never advised actual structural engineers
@RonJohn636 ай бұрын
0:57 Large scissors are (or used to be, 45 years ago) called "shears". That's how I remember what the shearing force is.
@Goalsplus6 ай бұрын
You're doing well. Keep them coming.
@professordeb4 ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@bridgeconstruction_irwansyah5 ай бұрын
GOOD EXPLAINATION
@ravshanbekmavlonov29964 ай бұрын
As always your content so so useful. Thanks! I expect this kind of more videos from you! Keep up good working.
@TheEngineeringHub4 ай бұрын
I'm happy to see tou back Rav! Cheers
@xaviergonzalez58286 ай бұрын
Beautiful video!
@Golgi-Gyges6 ай бұрын
The factor of different distances from the load to the base should be examined also (shear+torsional example has load positioned further from base).
@Steamrick6 ай бұрын
Does the 18% figure at the end include the shortening of the beam?
@TheEngineeringHub6 ай бұрын
No, so in reality, it would be a bit more than 18% if the beam was not shortened. Good question, cheers
@paulkurilecz42096 ай бұрын
Another failure mode to consider is lateral buckling in beams. Even though the beam may be loaded through the centroid, if the beam is long compared to it's moment of inertia, lateral buckling can occur. Buckling is an elastic instability problem.
@TheEngineeringHub6 ай бұрын
Yup, we already made a video on that. You can find it in our library
@benjaminorellana43104 ай бұрын
Awesome video! Could you upload the stl file please?
@markterribile69485 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation, but it would be improved if you added a caption as soon as you introduced a new term.
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
Amazing idea!! Thank you so much. This will be implemented in the future
@Prando346 ай бұрын
Such an awesome video. Thankyou!
@TheEngineeringHub6 ай бұрын
You are so welcome Prando! Glad you enjoyed it!
@asbestosfiber6 ай бұрын
I assume that the offset load as shown in the last demonstration become higher as the load becomes more offset, I'll guess it is probably exponential or close to it.
@corytierney9318Ай бұрын
Great video! Do you mind sharing the file for the 3D print?
@stefanguiton6 ай бұрын
Great video
@Edmund-kg7fp5 ай бұрын
Thank you !
@Astroponicist5 ай бұрын
I am interested in how to modify typical construction calculations for the design of structures on Luna, & Mars. Because Mass & weight are separate functions linked by G where typically we would think of G as always being a value of 1, on Luna G is The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Moon is approximately 1.625 m/s2, about 16.6% that on Earth's surface or 0.166 ɡ. but I don't know how that works for figuring out how much load an I-beam load bearing capacity should be expected to change, ect. can you make some videos to help us understand how to begin thinking about the design of larger structures on Luna, & Mars when the supplies become available? thank you.
@jimsvideos72014 ай бұрын
Thank you for this!
@angeloissa40886 ай бұрын
Good lesson, keep it up!
@bobmartin60556 ай бұрын
Very helpful!
@Mikiszub6 ай бұрын
Normal bolt connections are not under shear stress- tension from nut forces 2 plates together and generates friction
@m.50516 ай бұрын
Many connections actually are bearing/shear type connections for strength type loading.
@Mikiszub6 ай бұрын
@@m.5051 that is jist plain wrong. Only if you use shoulder bolts/screws like din 609/ iso 7379. Trust me, I do this shit for living
@m.50516 ай бұрын
@Mikiszub Do you think your measly experience means anything? I design bridges for a living, and we design the connections as slip critical for service loads and shear/bearing for strength loads. I'm the engineer that tells you, the monkey, that bolt goes here.
@Mikiszub6 ай бұрын
@@m.5051 I' d better not drive bridges you design then. Additionaly- I design cranes and other transport devices for living.
@m.50516 ай бұрын
@Mikiszub Hah, no you don't. And that's how all bridges are designed...go check out AASHTO bro.
@olgajoachimosmundsen46476 ай бұрын
Would a synonym for moment be force or load?
@H34...5 ай бұрын
A moment is a torque, or force/load at a distance from a pivot. Just physicists call it torque, engineers call it moment from my experience.
@yaaaaa.35 ай бұрын
Pllllz can you shaire with us the code w that you used it in the video about Magnus effect plllllz,i really need it
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
I am missing some files but I can share what I have. You may need to fix it up
@yaaaaa.35 ай бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub oh that's ok , if you find it please share it with me 🙏
@melgross5 ай бұрын
I don’t totally trust examples,especially that are made so differently from actual materials. For this to=o be more convincing, the beams should have been made in the solid. I know, of course, that it would use a lot more materials. But the fact that these are hollow meant the loading characteristics are much more complex. Additionally, the plastic has a different bending modality. Many plastics will crack, or break instead of bending as steel does, particularly A 36, used in most construction.
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
Absolutely agree Mel, all of your points are valid. I will look into repeating this experiment with steel plates now that I have a 10t hydraulic press. Cheers and thanks for the valuable comment
@melgross5 ай бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub I’ll be sure not to miss it.
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
@melgross I'm testing some 2x4s currently and measuring the reduction in capacity when holes are drilled through them. That will be coming up shortly. Cheers
@jeanfrancoisbrodeur6 ай бұрын
Your 3d printed beams and experiments could be sold as learning tools to engineering schools
@TheEngineeringHub6 ай бұрын
I'd happily donate them if any educators are interested (or share the model so they can print it themselves)!