The Dispensational Revelation of the Mysteries - part 1

[@roberthern4167]

It's amazing that there are so few who have veiwed this Bible lesson. This confirms Matthew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

[@ScripturesAndScience]

Between living in a world of unbelief, most do not accept God and the Bible being the Word of God, combined with those who do yet do not rightly divide the Word of truth, not surprising. So much deception confusion and chaos in the world, Satan is good at what he does.

[@ScripturesAndScience]

A correction in representation The path is broad(accept Christ Jesus) Gate being narrow, rely on Christ blood for salvation. And yet for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, it is the most exciting time in history to live. We witness the dispentational revelation of the mysteries unfold before our very eyes. No other generation was blessed at access to so much wisdom of the Word of God at our finger tips in seconds. With discernment God blesses us greatly.

[@savannahhernandez3467]

@ScripturesAndScience, also see: 1 COR. 15:1-4,(14,16,17,19,20); ROM. 1:(1),*4; 10:9-10; 2 TIM. 2:8.❤

[@debwell7248]

IN CASE YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THIS VOICE BEFORE...THIS IS THE GREAT TEACHER LES FELDICK.

[@savannahhernandez3467]

AMEN😊😊❤❤❤

[@debwell7248]

Thank you for putting this study by Les together in one place. Appreciate your work!

[@ScripturesAndScience]

Very welcome

[@markrogers6090]

God bless Brother Les Feldick.

[@ScripturesAndScience]

Part 1-3 originally broadcast - twelve 30 minute TV episodes - Through The Bible with Les Feldick - 2006 - Part 1-3 - twelve TV episodes found in original format - kzbin.info/www/bejne/o4mpf3SDbb1-pZo Part 4 originally broadcast - On Prophecy Watchers KZbin Channel June 8th 2016 found in original format - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qKmwm2VmqbqSfrM

[@savannahhernandez3467]

AMEN😊😊❤❤❤

[@blainemcmahan7624]

Wow. What a Great Channel. Welcome to the Remnant! 🥰🙏🏼Praise God

[@brendarogers7373]

I enjoyed this very much thank you.

[@ScripturesAndScience]

Fulfilling knowing its enjoyed and useful, you are welcome. God bless

[@brendarogers7373]

I plan on listening to the other sessions also.

[@valeriekjv]

Nicely put together ... Thank you! 🙆

[@ScripturesAndScience]

You are very welcome!

[@loos3eleaf]

more videos please

[@Mike65809]

The church age cannot end. Ever wonder how Jews in the tribulation can come to Christ? If they do, they will be grafted onto their own "olive tree" (Rom. 11). That olive tree today only consists of Jews and Gentiles who believe in Jesus. They are spiritual Israel and are they not the church? Indeed they are. Today the church is the believing branches of the tree, Jew and Gentile. So, how can they get grafted onto the tree in the tribulation, if the church is removed?????

[@ScripturesAndScience]

The "church" - the body of Christ - those accepting the death burial(for 3 days) and resurrection of Christ - as written in the scriptures are grafted in, correct. This has nothing to do with the Jews nor does the Christian replace the nation of Israel or the Jew that accepts Christ upon his return to the earth. God did not change his mind or change his plan of salvation for mankind but there is however a different future for the nation of Israel and the Jew accepting their Messiah upon his return and the future for those covered by the blood of our savior on the cross. One having a earthly first estate and the other having a heavenly first estate. As for the Book of Revelation like all other portions of the NT not written by Paul the Apostle the information is for and direct to the Jew. I direct you to Revelation 7:13-17 and point out these adorned in white robes(those covered by the blood of Christ on the cross) these are "church" or body of Christ prior to the opening of the 7th seal followed in chapter 8. I may also suggest completing studies and receive the information and wisdom from it in its entirety, before making comments. Let me also refer you to a more detailed study on the epistles of Paul knowing your position - The Heavenly Connection - kzbin.info/aero/PLfrvjrM4LhnuEtxvATZRpF5MCE9eV0CEs Praise our Lord and savior Jesus Christ - God bless

[@Mike65809]

You may have missed the point of my post, is that simply, the church age never ends. Question: So are the Jews who accept Jesus saved? Is someone saved who is not redeemed by the Blood of the Lamb? Remember the dividing wall has come down in Christ. There is no difference. The only difference is that the Jews who are saved will dwell in the Promised Land, according to Ez. 36. As for who will reign on the earth in the Age to Come, you will see it will be Christian, both Jew and Gentile. See Daniel 7 where all of the kingdoms under the whole heaven will serve and worship the Son of Man. All kingdoms will serve and obey Him, not just redeemed Israel. Blessed are the meek, for they shall...? Jesus redeemed man from every tribe, nation and language, and made them kings and priests "and they will reign on the earth." There is no distinction in Christ. Your line about non-Pauline letters directed to Jews is off. Revelation was written to 7 churches. Now, were they Jewish churches??? No. They were probably a mixture. Peter was written to whom? What did he say that shows it was directed only to Jewish believers?

[@ScripturesAndScience]

Those accepting Christ as their Messiah upon his return are not saved by the blood of the lamb, hence why you see the re-initiation of the temple services during his reign. Correct there is no division at this present moment(this dispensation)upon the return of Christ begins a new dispensation for mankind alive on the earth. I refer to a study on the 7 churches(this mini series was included on the previous study I recommended) The 7 churches(assemblies) kzbin.info/aero/PLfrvjrM4Lhnv5JDy5Ne08GOXbp8Fb05DM The ONLY epistles directed to the gentiles are written by Paul the apostle. Again I refer you to a previous study I mentioned that goes over all the details of which you question, if you are truly curious about the position this channel holds review it in its entirety with an open mind and heart and it shall become clear. The Heavenly Connection - kzbin.info/aero/PLfrvjrM4LhnuEtxvATZRpF5MCE9eV0CEs That series incorporates several other mini series's within it such as the one you are commenting on now, the 7 churches and various others. To continue to debate this without you first reviewing the material in its entirety is fruitless on both of our efforts, please do so. Praise our Lord and savior Jesus Christ - God bless

[@roberthern4167]

@@Mike65809 Christians are in the Body of Christ; HE is the Head. Jesus is also the King of the Jews. Zechariah 14 reveals how the Lord will return feet first to the mount of Olives. This is the fist day the return, the coming of the Lord; The Day of The Lord. Distroying those attacking Israel at that time. Verse :9 says The Lord Will be King of the whole world. This is the beginning of The Kingdom on earth, The Lord is King

[@brendarogers7373]

The volume needs to be higher.

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the gospel of the kingdom! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah died for his people! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people at his coming! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Matt 24 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@savannahhernandez3467]

Please read: HEB. 11:6; ROM. 15:4,8; 2 TIM. 2:8,15; 1 COR. 10:11; ACTS 9:15; 11:19; 13:38-39; 16:14; 20:24; ROM. 11:13; 2:16; 16:25; 1:1,16,17; 3:23,24-26; 4:3,5; 6:23; 10:9-10,17; 1 COR. 15:1-4,(14,16,17,19,20); 2 COR. 5:16,17,19,21; 3:5-7; GAL. 1:1,11-12,15-16; EPH. 3:1,2; 1:7,12-13; 2:8-9; COL. 1:20-25; 1 TIM. 2:5-6; TIT. 2:11,(12),13.

[@Scripture-Man]

Well I have listened to just a few minutes of this man and could listen no longer I'm afraid. I was not familiar with Mr Feldick but he does not seem to be a spiritual man at all, and I find his teaching very disturbing. In just the first few minutes of this video I took great objection to many things he taught, including... He cites various places where the KJV uses the word "dispensation" (meaning "assignment", "designation" or "allotted portion") and offers this as "proof" of Dispensationalism! But the doctrines of the Dispensational movement have nothing whatsoever to do with the word "dispensation" in the Bible! They are unrelated. At 5:00 Mr Feldick says: "The body of Christ is only used in Paul's epistles - you never see the body of Christ mentioned anywhere else." Stop there. That is _very_ concerning. This strikes me as an extremely odd and disturbing thing to say, and I sensed demonic doctrines lurking behind it. So what if the expression "body of Christ" only appeared in Paul's letters? What exactly would that prove? Mr Feldick does not say. Is he trying to suggest that the churches planted by Paul were somehow different to the ones planted by Jesus and the Apostles? That would be both an absurd and dangerously heretical thing to teach. The Body of Christ is _one_! That is why there is one loaf, broken and shared between all. Those who sat with the Lord Jesus and ate His body are the same men who are part of my body, and the body of those to come in the future. We are all one body. Besides which, Mr Feldick's claim about the "body of Christ" being limited to Paul is not true. In Matthew 26:26 and Mark 14:22 the Lord says: "Take, eat; this is my body." Again, in Luke 22:19 He says: "This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me." Peter also refers to the Body of Christ: 1 Peter 2:24: "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed." Next Mr Feldick says: "Everything that God has done is based on a dispensational approach to Scripture". That statement doesn't actually make sense, but the implication behind it seems to be that "dispensationalism" is a big, important theme of the Bible. --But it isn't! We may be able to divide history up into different eras, which is fine, but the Bible itself never mentions the subject of these eras and it is clearly not important, or the Apostles would have mentioned it. I'm sorry but I cannot watch any more of these videos. I could spend hours trying to refute what Mr Feldick teaches, but I do not want to waste any more time. Mr Feldick does not strike me as being born again, he is just an intellectual man, not a spiritual one. No doubt he heard a false "gospel" and got involved with church religion rather than following the commands of Jesus, repenting, turning from sin, and being born again. Mr Feldick is trying to come up with teachings, doctrines and truth by using his eyes and his brain. That is neither the teaching of a spiritual man, nor the means by which a spiritual man receives Truth. The Spiritual man receives truth by the Spirit, having the mind of Christ: 1 Corinthians 2: 12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. 16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ. Having heard 10 minutes of this Les Feldick, I have tested his spirit and determined him to be false (1 John 4:1-3), and I would warn against his teaching, which seems to be nothing but dead intellectualism, rather than life-filled spiritual teaching of the Spirit. I have not heard Mr Feldick's "gospel" but I would be willing to bet it is either about "the love of God" or about "accepting Christ", neither of which are the true Gospel, which concerns death to the flesh, burial with Christ, and resurrection to newness of life. Apologises to any fans of Mr Feldick but I must obey the Lord Jesus, discern spirits, and rebuke false teaching as He called me to.

[@Scripture-Man]

Well I have just been away and had a look at the gospel Mr Feldick preaches (or should I say "gospelS"!) and frankly I am appalled. It has affirmed everything I sensed from him. This man is an enemy of the Cross and not born again.

[@ScripturesAndScience]

I am curious why a individual would use any other source then the Bible to determine Dispensation. When you make reference to a "movement" you do yourself a injustice but not studying the Biblical facts and make an assessment based on teaching you must have come across in the past(accurate or inaccurate unknown). There is distinct separations in God's design from Adam to the present, the definition of a dispensation is - how God deals with mankind in a particular manner during a specific time frame. By your comments I assume you have spent very little time in the epistles of Paul(by far the 1 individual contributing more books to the Bible then any other, including Moses)and focus mainly in other gospels(Mathew, Mark, Luke and John). The epistles of Paul is the only location detailing and describing salvation by faith of the shed blood of Christ on the cross, the mysteries which were given solely to Paul(the rapture and others) . In any case or position you may hold may grace and peace be upon you, praise our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, God bless

[@Scripture-Man]

Hello again. :) Thank you for your message. I really would like to reply to the various things you mentioned, but I must apologise because I have written quite a long message below. Now since I place strong emphasis on structure and division, I will use headings to divide it up and make it more structured... NON-BIBLICAL SOURCES? Firstly, let me say that all my understanding of Doctrine comes from the Bible alone (and of course from the Spirit). I have not studied any other books, nor would I. There is only one inspired Word of God and that is the 66 books of the Protestant Bible. No more, no less. I believe that absolutely and zealously. ERAS OF HISTORY Now I do agree with "dispensationalism" in the basic sense of meaning: that the Lord has dealt with man differently during different eras. I think that is true, and I don't think many Christians would deny this. To me, it is quite evident that Adam and Eve lived through two fundamentally different eras of mankind's history (before and after the Fall). Then, arguably, a new era began after the flood. Most certainly, a new era began with Moses. And likewise a new era began when the Lord Jesus came to earth and brought about the New Covenant of the Kingdom of God: men on earth filled with the Holy Spirit from Heaven. I consider the Old Testament saints and New Testament saints to be profoundly different, and belonging to a profoundly different era of history. (Matthew 11:11 makes this undeniably clear!) It is also clear that there will be one final distinct era of man's history, during the 1,000 year reign of our Lord. One more era might be counted which is after the Judgement, when all sin and sinners have been eradicated, and the Holy City comes down from Heaven. So I count 7 eras, and other men may count differently. On a related topic, I also count 5 eras in the Christian's own lifetime. The first is the life in the flesh, born as a slave of sin. The second is the life in the Spirit, after being born again and entering the Kingdom. The third is the time spent in the grave, or Hades (opinions on this vary but I am not of the opinion that there will be any consciousness in Hades). The fourth era of the Christian life is our time reigning over the world during the Millennium. And the fifth is what they call "eternity"! :) So yes I do firmly believe in "eras" and divisions. But I do not make too much of this. If someone wants to divide things slightly differently, that is up to him. How we divide up history is not of spiritual importance. What really matters is _spiritual Truth_! Are we walking in the Light, being led by the Spirit, and proclaiming the true Gospel? Those things are what really matters, not how we divide up our history books!

[@Scripture-Man]

DEFINITION OF DISPENSATIONALISM? So as I say, "dispensationalism" can simply refer to this idea of splitting history into eras. However, the term "Dispensationalism" is generally understood to mean a lot more than this. It normally refers a whole system of beliefs which includes the pre-tribulation Rapture. I think is fair to refer to this system of beliefs as a "movement", and I do not consider that a pejorative term (for example, I would call Zionism a "movement" - one which I am proud to associate with). I'm sure you know its history, but the dispensationalist movement started off in the early 1800s here in Devon, England. That is where I live, and it is still very strong here. In fact, the only church I have ever been a member of was a Dispensationalist Brethren Assembly church. They would speak about the Rapture in just about ever Sunday service. Therefore, this is a subject I have some familiarity with. In the 1800s, Dispensationalist views were taken to America and found their way into the notes of the Scofield Bible. This, in turn, became highly successful and brought the Dispensationalist movement to a very wide audience. And thus from the beginning of the 20th century onwards, Dispensationalism grew very strong in America. (Even Chuck Missler grew up reading the Scofield Bible.) So I presume it is this meaning of "dispensationalism" which Mr Feldick is defending in his video. It is also this meaning which I am not in agreement with. Probably the main reason I take a dim view of "Dispensationalism" is because it divides the Body of Christ into two. The view held by traditional dispensationalists is that the "church" and "Israel" have two separate destinies; that the Jews will not be born again, but will live separately to the church. In other words: many dispensationalists actually believe that Israel will never receive the New Covenant promised to them, but will remain forever carnal! As far as I'm concerned, that is quite a wacky and disturbing teaching, which goes against the whole idea of Israel being God's beloved nation, which is stated repeatedly throughout the Bible. If _anyone_ is set to inherit the Kingdom of God and the promised New Covenant, it is the Jews. So the idea that the Jews and Gentiles have two different destinies is not Biblical. Galatians 3:28 says that in Christ there is "neither Jew nor Greek", nor "male and female". This does not mean that Jews and Gentiles have now lost our individual identities, or that men and women are now equal. It means that the promises of the New Covenant are equally for all, and that there is only one Body in Christ. Speaking of Israel and Gentiles, Paul said: Ephesians 2:14 "For he himself is our peace, who has *made us both one* and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility" IGNORING THE EPISTLES? Now you assume that I have spent little time studying Paul. That assumption would be incorrect. In fact, I believe that the Epistles are the PRIMARY source of Christian doctrine, and therefore the Epistles are the most relevant documents to any Christian. If a Christian does not pay attention to the Epistles, he is going to get himself in serious trouble! That is why, as one called as a theologian, I make it my priority to know the Epistles better than any other part of the Bible. It is the Epistles which I focus on studying, above all other parts of the Bible. I have studied the Epistles zealously and carefully, and I know them intimately, all 121 chapters. THE NEW TESTAMENT: TWO BOOKS, NOT ONE Now as I said earlier, I am a someone who places strong emphasis on structure and division, and when it comes to the Bible, I place great emphasis on structure. In fact, I consider the whole Bible as being dividable into 7 sections, and I have literally taken my Bible apart, divided it into 7 different sections, and re-covered those sections to make them 7 different books. - The last two of these sections being the two halves of the New Testament. To me, the New Testament is like 2 different books in one. First, you have the Gospels + Acts. Then you have the Epistles + Revelation. I believe it is important for all Christians to understand the profound difference between these two halves of the New Testament... The Gospels + Acts were written to proclaim the Gospel to sinners, which is why they are called the "Gospels". While the Epistles were written to the converted saints, which is why they are addressed to the saints. Therefore, the Gospels + Acts tell people _how_ to be born again and _how to find_ the Kingdom. But after we have been born again and entered the Kingdom, the Gospels and Acts become less immediately relevant, and we focus more on the Epistles, which teach us how to walk. The Epistles are nutrition for growing Christians. So the Gospels are about _preaching to sinners_ while the Epistles are about _teaching the saints_. The Gospels major on how to _be saved_ while the Epistles major on _how to walk_ once you are saved.

[@Scripture-Man]

PAUL PREACHING A NEW GOSPEL? Now you clearly believe that Paul is preaching his own "gospel" which is different to the other Apostles. However, that is not the case. Paul's teaching is no different to any of the other 4 Epistle authors and I make absolutely no distinction there. All 5 Epistle writers agree completely with one another on all doctrine, since it was the same Holy Spirit who truly wrote them all. So what is the reason Paul's epistles seem to preach a "different Gospel"? The reason is that the purpose of those epistles is in fact _not_ to preach the Gospel at all! Consider this: if the Epistles are written to the born-again saints, then _why_ would born-again saints need to hear the Gospel, when they have already heard it, followed it and been born again by it? It would be totally illogical for Paul's letters to be full of preaching the Gospel! Paul does not do that. He focuses on _teaching_ for Christians. For example, in Paul's epistle to the Romans, Paul expounds doctrine, clarifies the technicalities of the Chrisitan faith, and corrects many errors and misunderstandings - particularly those errors regarding confision of the places of Jews and Gentiles, which is the real heart of the letter. Paul is certainly not "preaching" to unconverted Romans; he is layout out doctrine to already-converted Romans! It would be absolutely unthinable for Paul to command his Roman readers to "REPENT!" since he is writing to Christians who have already heard the Gospel, already heard the command to repent, and already obeyed that command! This is not to say that Paul's letters can't be used to evangelize. They can. And Paul's words certainly include elements of admonition to false Christians, to give a reality check to those who are going astray. Paul was no doubt well aware that many false Christians would come to read his letters: those who were not right with God and needed to repent. However, the primary purpose of his letters was not to preach the Gospel all over again - they were written to men who had already heard the Gospel preached and knew the Gospel. And we find that Gospel being preached in the _book of Acts_. That book is our practical model for preaching the Gospel and converting people. REVELATION GIVEN TO PAUL You mention the matter of "mysteries being revealed to Paul" - as though Paul was the sole recipient of some "new gospel" different to the other Apostles. Please believe me that this is not the case. Paul certainly received a great deal from the Lord: he received prophecy, spiritual revelation of the Kingdom, and revelation of correct doctrine from the Lord. Paul received SO MUCH! However, that is not the same as receiving a brand new gospel! There is no suggestion that Paul's Gospel was different to the Gospel preached by Jesus and the Apostles. I would like you to please bear in mind 3 relevant facts here concerning Paul's revelation: 1. Firstly, unlike the other Apostles, Paul never met Jesus in the flesh and was not taught man-to-man. Following his conversion, he was on his own for many years when he was in training. Therefore, much of the Doctrine and teaching he received HAD to be revealed by spiritual revelation, since there was no one physically present to teach him. So he received the doctrines of the Kingdom direct from the source. That does not mean he received a _new_ Gospel though, does it? 2. Second, we must remember that MANY of God's children receive Heavenly prophecy and not just Paul. That is not an unusual incident. Acts 2 reminds us of what Joel prophesied: "Your young men will see visions: your old men will dream dreams". Indeed, Paul had much to say about prophecies in the church. There are to be many prophets in the church, and many who receive from the Lord, even women! Was Paul the only Apostle who received revelation? Absolutely not: John wrote the book of Revelation! If anyone was blessed with revelations of divine truth it was John. As a man who has received prophecy myself, I can vouch for the fact that prophetic revelation is by no means something unique to Paul. 3. Thirdly, let us consider what it means to be truly saved. Does it not mean being born again as a new person and becoming a "New Creation"? Does it not mean being crucified to the flesh and being made spiritual, having a whole new spiritual realm opened up to you - so that you are no longer blind and now you can see? If a man has been saved, does it not mean that the Holy Spirit is now living inside him, making his thoughts to be like the thoughts of God and having the mind of Christ? Therefore, if someone has been saved, would it not be correct to say that they have had a "revelation" from God and have come into the Truth, having the mysteries of the Gospel opened up to them? It is my contention then that ANYONE who has been born again and entered into the Kingdom has been profoundly changed, and has received revelation of Spiritual mysteries which are hidden to the world. So when Paul speaks of having received revelation of these things, he is stating what is normal for _all_ Christians. 1 Corinthians 2:9:10 "9 But, as it is written, “What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him”- these things God *has revealed to us* through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God" Please note that Paul said "to _us_" and not "to _me only_"!