The Economics of Nuclear Power: A Closer Look

  Рет қаралды 3,072

Mr. Singularity

Mr. Singularity

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 13
@detectiveofmoneypolitics
@detectiveofmoneypolitics 3 ай бұрын
0:01 economic investigator is following this very important milestone of energy efficiency and clean energy of Nuclear cheers Frank 😊
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Жыл бұрын
The economics of renewables will dramatically increase our electric rates and insure massive rolling blackouts. Nuclear will be key for our future.
@MrSingularity
@MrSingularity Жыл бұрын
I believe this too. Thorium could be an interesting alternative aswell.
@brandonmesser2503
@brandonmesser2503 Жыл бұрын
Do these numbers factor in the subsidies that are now given to nuclear power? Remember, solar and wind have been highly subsidies.
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Жыл бұрын
@@LMB222 In case you didn't get the Greenie memo, fossil fuels are to be eliminated and they don't like nuclear even though they can't come up with a good reason to be anti-nuke. Without fossil fuels or nuclear, we face a very grim future.
@clarkkent9080
@clarkkent9080 Жыл бұрын
@@brandonmesser2503 You mean like the $2 billion of taxpayer welfare given to Terrapower and NuSclae to build their test reactors that they advertised as only costing $1 billion each. Or the $36 billion that Biden has for bribing old nuclear power plat investor owned utilities to keep them running. Or the Trillions (in today dollars) spent over the last 70 years by the government designing, building, and operating every reactor type known.
@orionstark
@orionstark Жыл бұрын
You do not need to ramp down a nuclear power plant if it is being used to run waste conversion facilities. With enough cheap electricity it becomes economically viable to convert refuse into biodiesel and other useful hydrocarbons.
@petermarsh4993
@petermarsh4993 3 ай бұрын
Around 3:00 you showed that Nuclear would cost 6 $bn and gas $980 bn. I think your zeroes are out of whack. I bn = 1,000,000,000 {nine zeroes} but your cost for gas has twelve zeroes. {trillions} It’s hard to keep concentration beyond this point if simple maths is so poorly scrutinised in what should be a scientific presentation.
@gerrtryks2944
@gerrtryks2944 Жыл бұрын
I think Thorium is the best ramp it up
@joshua1557
@joshua1557 Жыл бұрын
'promo sm'
The Uncertain Future of Nuclear Power
20:03
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
MIT Has Predicted that Society Will Collapse in 2040 | Economics Explained
18:47
Economics Explained
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
World’s strongest WOMAN vs regular GIRLS
00:56
A4
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
小丑家的感情危机!#小丑#天使#家庭
00:15
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 38 МЛН
Renewables vs. Fossil Fuels: The True Cost of Energy
17:30
Engineering with Rosie
Рет қаралды 86 М.
It's Happening - China Launches World's First Thorium Nuclear Reactor
20:36
Why the U.S. Can’t Use the Oil It Produces
14:57
Morning Brew
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
How an ASML Lithography Machine Moves a Wafer
16:15
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 453 М.
Is Saudi Arabia really quitting oil?
12:41
DW Planet A
Рет қаралды 109 М.
The Economics of Nuclear Energy
16:11
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Why is Western Nuclear so Expensive?
45:55
Decouple Media
Рет қаралды 3,6 М.
Effect of Nuclear Energy on Total System Electricity Costs.
30:25
Australian Nuclear Association
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Why is the US economy so resilient? | Counting the Cost
25:26
Al Jazeera English
Рет қаралды 89 М.
Why Thorium will be a Game-Changer in Energy
32:00
Copenhagen Atomics
Рет қаралды 266 М.
World’s strongest WOMAN vs regular GIRLS
00:56
A4
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН