I have just read this work for a presentation I'm preparing for a philosophy class. your video did a great job of further explaining the content. Thank you.
@keithahess3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to hear it. Thanks!
@Buriburi19473 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your explanation. It helped me a lot to complete my assignment
@keithahess3 жыл бұрын
No problem, thanks!
@vkorchnoifanАй бұрын
I have read books and talk to two persons who have had near death experience. So I have a belief that I will survive after death.
@kyawzayyarlwin80037 ай бұрын
Thanks
@kanakpandey41423 жыл бұрын
very easily explained, its very helpful for me..
@keithahess3 жыл бұрын
Good, thanks!
@krishamenor8817 Жыл бұрын
Maniwala sa anumang bagay sa hindi sapat na ebidensya
@rodolfo99162 жыл бұрын
The problem with saying that it is ethically wrong to believe in things that are not based on evidence is that it pressuposes the existence of a ethics based on evidence. But it seems to me that there is no ethics that does not start from axiomatic presuppositions that don't have evidence for. The most famous person who defends the existence of an evidence-based ethics is Sam Harris and his argument basically goes like this: All sentient beings avoid suffering, Therefore, we ought to reduce suffering in the aggregate. But note that the conclusion does not follow from the premise, this argument would only be valid if we add the following premise: All sentient beings avoid suffering, We ought to reduce the aggregate amount of what all sentient beings avoid, Therefore, we ought to reduce suffering in the aggregate. But what is the evidence for the proposition "We ought to reduce the aggregate amount of what all sentient beings avoid"? If you accept it, you will already be believing something without having any evidence for.
@keithahess2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rodolfo, Thank you for the comment. By 'evidence,' do you mean 'empirical evidence'?
@rodolfo99162 жыл бұрын
@@keithahess Yes
@keithahess2 жыл бұрын
@@rodolfo9916 couldn't we have (at least in principle) non-empirical evidence to justify moral claims?
@rodolfo99162 жыл бұрын
@@keithahess Maybe. Could we (at least in principle) use non-empirical evidence to justify our non-moral belifs?
@keithahess2 жыл бұрын
@@rodolfo9916 Absolutely. We justify mathematical beliefs using non-empirical evidence and methods.