The Evolution of Aircraft Cockpits

[@wardistinct2854]

Super interesting video, only issue is that it should really have more views

[@vijaychobhe]

This deserves thousands of views

[@FlyByMax]

:)

[@smg7YTPs]

nah, millions.

[@simulationflow603]

this is amazing ! keep up this very high quality content !

[@orangejjay]

I can't believe this only has 2.9K views. Your channel is great. I've never been interested in the specifics of aviation but now I've stumbled on your channel and am binge-ing all your videos. Awesome work! Thanks for keeping these coming. :D

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you so much :)

[@vitormd1138]

Amazing video and quality! Really enjoying the content.

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you! It's fantastic to see you tune in again :) have a good one!

[@vitormd1138]

@@FlyByMax I will always show up, i really enjoy the content! Keep it up, already got 1k subs time to reach 10k!

[@BeauVerwijlen]

Wow, a really incredible movie! Keep in mind the first A300 models still needed a Flight Engineer and where lacking a FMS.

[@aaryanramourti3081]

Keep uploading!! Love them!

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks!

[@InfiniteFinite]

Only 145 views?! The videos are well-made, I really enjoyed your content!

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you!

[@codehound8033]

Good job showing the positives of the new digital systems. Now we need one on the negatives. There are numerous videos showing the horrible things that can go wrong when a system mis-behaves or is mis-used. Pilots become busy trying to trouble shoot the systems rather than flying the airplane the old fashioned way. And even if they do revert to manually flying the plane they experience an unfamiliar situation and abnormal work load.

[@1239719]

really love your videos man

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you so much!

[@maggus999]

Really good content! I couldn't help but think of Concorde multiple times throughout the video, as it surely must be one of the most advanced analogue electromechanical planes ever built, and had quite a few logic systems governing automatic functions, without any digitisation. A video on that with a similar format to this would be brilliant.

[@SUN_2607]

Couldn't agree more!

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks for your comment! That's a really interesting suggestion. I don't own the Concorde in XP11 and I don't know much about its systems, but I'm definitely looking into this.

[@maggus999]

@@FlyByMax I hear the Colimata is not exactly amazing when it comes to in-depth. though v2 is miles better than v1. The 32 bit FSLabs for FSX/P3Dv3 is no longer for sale but is the OG high fidelity study sim, I'll give you my serial if you're interested in that platform at all. You'd have to downgrade nVidia drivers etc, but it's doable. The 64 bit version is in development, and previews are apparently coming soon.

[@DolioFoilio]

Great video keep em coming!

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks so much!

[@julians9362]

Yet another great video of yours! The enthusiasm you put into these videos is amazing, as I myself find this topic to be very interesting. For example the fact that even though having modern EFIS screens, Manufacturers still tend to use round dials for Engine instrumentations with coloured ares as in many cases not the actual value is important but the fact if this value fits into a certain range or not. Yet for an Airspeed indicator for example a tape with a big and prominent number is found to be most efficient. These concepts and ideas are what amaze me about aviation so much, as engineers have thought through every single bit of these huge machines to ensure safe and efficient operations.

[@FlyByMax]

Very good point about the round engine dials, I hadn't thought about that before! It's so cool that we share the same passion for these ideas, and thank you so much for stopping by again :) working on the next one as we speak!

[@hammadansari7595]

Dude !! I love flight simulation. And everything about it.. this is such a good video. Lots of things I didn't know. Great job.

[@tadeoortizelizalde819]

Man, good shit setting up the new barrier of knowledge. Never even thought this was a thing!

[@boing7679]

Your channel is seriously underrated, you gained yourself a new subscriber!

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you!

[@Jaem-ml4lx]

You made this easy for me to understand.Thanks!

[@Luke173]

very nice production, thanks for teaching

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks!

[@mitchellkaye9619]

Excellent content and presentation. Thank you. Just subscribed

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you Mitchell!

[@pinethegangsta]

Finally a new video!! I couldn't wait for it to come out as always, excellent quality! Keep this up!

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks for your enthusiasm! It's great to see you again :))

[@Parkinwad]

Beautiful and well explained! Much appreciated! 🙂

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks!

[@mohamedraafi_]

Thank you! Really benefitted from this video.

[@azizalkanderi8441]

Very informative and great quality .. keep it up bro :-)

[@FlyByMax]

Thanks a lot!

[@audigit]

Nice Video and informative to me. Thank you!

[@Bearviation]

Once again you hit it out of the ballpark! I am a fan of history in general and more-specifically many aspects of aviation. You briefly touched upon navigation in terms of how the FMS allows pilots to maintain graphic situational awareness. Have you considered creating a video on the history of navigation - how we started by the stars, dead reckoning, NDBs, then VORs, CIVA/OMEGA (INS systems could almost be their own video) and then the evolution into what we have today? Cheers!

[@FlyByMax]

Thank you! Reading this comment was a funny experience for me, because I've been contemplating a series that would follow EXACTLY what you've just outlined (literally starting with the stars + dead reckoning). With the CL650 I can now also show how the gyroscopes are feeding the INS and what the accelerometers are measuring, which is something I've never been able to do before. Not exactly sure if it will be the next video, but at some point your idea will definitely come to fruition on this channel :) Have a good one!

[@Bearviation]

@@FlyByMax Great minds... same channel (or gutter, depending). Cheers!

[@sandystanley1237]

The frightening thing is that many of the digital controls tend to have a "mind" of their own. Anyone remembers that Qantas A 330?

[@artyfly100]

Did something happen with a quantas a330?

[@sandystanley1237]

@@artyfly100 started to go, "thinking" it was stalling, nose down and the pilot was not able to override. Then tje plane would right itself, dive again...

[@aaaaa-sy3lu]

Loved this vid keep it up

[@edward28051989]

I love old cockpit and lots of gauges 😂

[@JaidenJimenez86]

I've never had the pleasure of flying in a glass cockpit for real, about as close as I get is an avidyne GPS, but playing with the G1000 in flight sim just feels like I've enabled cheat mode. Especially when you have things like synthetic vision, etc.

[@beau4690]

Keep it up!

[@filiphabek271]

Nice video. Best cockpit is hybrid cockpit. Analog instruments make good backup in case of software errors and computer malfunctions. Why is there a trend for completely removing analog instruments from a cockpit?

[@dinky9216]

A few reasons. Digital involves less wiring and power and thus less weight. It is also easier to have redundancy and error correction and therefore can be more reliable. Modern aircraft have more parameters to monitor. So to have less trustworthy analogue as well would create a very cluttered cockpit that is difficult to scan at moments of high workload. You'd end up with a confusing archaic mess like the 737Max.

[@דןבןדוד-ר2ל]

Omg you are amazinggg

[@aze4308]

only 10k views? :(

[@himneeshchowdhary820]

wow!

[@Tod_x]

wow