*Big thank you to those that actively support the channel via Patreon or Channel Memberships!* -Patreons www.patreon.com/join/Bismarck -Channel Membership kzbin.info/door/mpahmxWXajV0-tuMMzSzAgjoin
@loveofmangos61124 жыл бұрын
Hey new fan as of January 2020. In your video of the FW 190 at a museum I noticed a Heinkel 111 in the background. How much will I have to pay on pateron for you to ask the museum to do an inside the cockpit of that aircraft and build of the plane? Thanks.
@robertwoodliff25364 жыл бұрын
Great work..., couple of remarks, "drawing office" not room, "head above water" not over water...or "kept in the black".
@untruelie26404 жыл бұрын
I have a (humble) suggestion for you: Would it be possible for you to make a couple of videos about the history of the various German Airplane Manufacturing Companies? Many people talk about some of their plane models, but the personal and institutional history behind these models is also very interesting (yet often glossed over). Junkers for example: Hugo Junkers was one of the most important pioneers of airplane engineering and the history of the company doesn't just end in 1945. The forced exile of the Junkers engineers in the Soviet Union, their work for the Soviet Military and their influence on the (short lived) airplane industry of the GDR (Type 152, Pirna Jet Engines) is most interesting in my opinion, but not exactly well known.
@TheArklyte4 жыл бұрын
Was german aircraft radial engine developement a failure in the end if compared to innovations and solutions americans, japanese and soviets came up with for their designs to both increase performance and simplify the designs?
@JB-yb4wn4 жыл бұрын
@@robertwoodliff2536 "kept in the dark"
@abett61114 жыл бұрын
I'd very suspicious, if I was a German, of having a pilot called Kevin flying my planes.
@fulcrum29514 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffles*
@abett61114 жыл бұрын
@@Galland_ That's fantastic! Although according to wiki that phrase was coined in 2009, but still great.
@frufru00714 жыл бұрын
Galland we’ve had several "Kevinistic" riots here in BC, (Canada). Then-in a move reminiscent of something "ol' 'dolph Hitler" might’ve made, the Kevinists made a surprise 90° turn to California and or successful in their invasion of, primarily, Los Angeles and the Beverly Hills district in particular. The last I heard, this gang formed a dancing group and were performing in theatrical plays, and winning praise for it! The world works in mysterious ways, "Herr Galland".
@supa3ek4 жыл бұрын
Adolf Kevin !!
@wideyxyz22714 жыл бұрын
Hey Kevins a great guy and a great pilot. If you dont believe me go check out Blitz's channel hes a big fan of Kevin!
@johnaitken74304 жыл бұрын
What I find fascinating is your discussions of operational and strategic elements. Am in my 70s and grew up excited by iconic names, planes and pilots...and blow by blow history of things but without knowing the whys..I’ve flown tiger moths and a few other biplanes, plus regular fairly modern sport planes..the stuff you discuss resonates so well with heart and mind
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
Thank John. Appreciate the support and happy to hear you enjoy the videos!
@johnaitken74304 жыл бұрын
Ability Damage can’t dispute that, but they are are fun to fly..I learned on one..
@ZzmemeguyzZ4 жыл бұрын
how’d u get that symbol on ur name
@EstonianShark4 жыл бұрын
@@ZzmemeguyzZ Become a KZbin member. Basically a Twitch subscription but for KZbin, comes with some perks and you get access to videos a few days prior/you could also just pay for the patreon which gives some extra info and research Bis put into the vids :-)
@ZzmemeguyzZ4 жыл бұрын
Estonian Shark i see, thanks
@AssassinAgent4 жыл бұрын
Damn, that's just great: gets thrown out of his own company and does the first working helo
@bigblue69174 жыл бұрын
I used to know a man who was a keen football player and started his own team so he could get a game. Unfortunately his skills did not match his enthusiasm and the team dropped him
@freddekl11024 жыл бұрын
This sounds like something Elon Musk would do in his situation
@trauko13884 жыл бұрын
Also the first production one, look for Fa 223 Drache.
@freddekl11024 жыл бұрын
@Jimmy De'Souza In what way is that buying into his personality cult? I hate celebrities(esp business ones) by default yet pretending he's not capable of some crazy stuff is just silly possibly pretentious. Also great life tactic dude, please do go around acting like you are the only one who knows anything about anything and sucking fun out of room.
@dinoco36724 жыл бұрын
@@freddekl1102 I forgivee ue
@anthonyhayes12674 жыл бұрын
"And the pilot was named Kevin" 😂
@julemandenudengaver45804 жыл бұрын
The only thing they didn't had
@bigblue69174 жыл бұрын
@@SlocketSeven Kevin was his identical twin brother which is where the confusion comes from. Of course with a name like Bruce he was clearly Australian
@UrWifiIsSlow4 жыл бұрын
100% Australian if the name is Bruce
@AsbestosMuffins4 жыл бұрын
"damnit kevin, its all your fault we lost the war!"
@davidbrennan6604 жыл бұрын
Fear Kevin. The Dislikes are from Kevins that don’t like it that the secret is now out.
@BobSmith-dk8nw4 жыл бұрын
Top Turret Gunner: 190's - 12 o'clock High - coming down ... NOW! Co-pilot: OH NO! IT'S KEVIN!!!! Pilot: BAIL OUT! BAIL OUT! Yes. In addition to the adventures of Kevin - this was highly interesting and explains why I never heard anything about Focke Wulf prior to the 190 and 200. Thanks! .
@svnnl48324 жыл бұрын
i cant wrap my head around the fact that there wasn't anyone that thought ..uhm maybe we should preserve at least one FW200 condor.....its such a beautiful airplane
@sirboomsalot49024 жыл бұрын
Iirc there is one currently under restoration
@jackass50664 жыл бұрын
In a war that would be the damn least of their concerns
@mikeblatzheim27974 жыл бұрын
Lufthansa Technik has one and is working on making it fully airworthy, as a spiritual replacement for their now grounded JU-87.
@noahwail24442 жыл бұрын
@@mikeblatzheim2797 JU 52, I think it is..
@mikeblatzheim27972 жыл бұрын
@@noahwail2444 Yes, that.
@Lord.Kiltridge4 жыл бұрын
Well, yes but you have to admit that Kevin was a damn good test pilot....
@FruitBrute20034 жыл бұрын
who is kevin?
@generalsherman12134 жыл бұрын
would like but the count is at 69
@pipss26694 жыл бұрын
I think ease of use and simplicity for maintenance are underappreciated aspects of warfare. Planes such as the Curtiss P-40 or Hawker Hurricane might have lacked in performance compared to its opponents, but it was relatively easy to get large numbers of the min the air regardless of the conditions. This is one of the reasons why those two planes were still beeing used up until 1945 in lesser theaters such as Burma and Africa. The Fw-190 is similar in beeing robust, userfriendly and easy (relatively) to maintain.
@matthiuskoenig33784 жыл бұрын
there was no fighting in africa in 1945. and when Africa had fighting it was the main theatre for the nations using P-40 and Hurricanes.
@vksasdgaming94723 жыл бұрын
It was also strong contrast to other German engineers who designed finely crafted, powerful machines which spent all their time in heated repair bay being pampered by team of experts. If they got out they were better than anything else and they never got out. FW-190 was direct opposition to that.
@hughjohnston4 жыл бұрын
A great insight into the focke wulf company. An informative and interesting look at a legendary name in aviation history .
@Farweasel Жыл бұрын
Just so - What Chris has done here is, in its way, quite brilliant. 💥 Loads of 'Techno-porn' (here is the motor stripped down, these are the raw perfomance figures....) exist. But to narrate the evolution in this way - That's both unusual and intriguing 💥 EXCEPT for that bit with three dismbodied heads trampolining under the Fw 159 That, well, that wasn't
@-ZETA-4 жыл бұрын
I adore the 190, and this is a great overview of the circumstances leading to its creation. If anyone is looking to get more into the nuts and bolts of this aircraft I strongly recommend the videos by Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles, here on KZbin.
@peterotto87794 жыл бұрын
"Among the best, if not THE best" not to mention the most beautiful of the warbirds
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles4 жыл бұрын
That was fantastic, great video. I really enjoyed all the information on the early days of Focke Wulf. The interwar stuff from Germany is particularly hard to research.
@julemandenudengaver45804 жыл бұрын
The FW42 looks like something Dick Dasterly and Mutly woud fly
@surekhakhole5254 жыл бұрын
Pegion Biryani
@hexadecimal73004 жыл бұрын
All of them before the 190 look like tryouts for vulture squadron!
@GoViking9333 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best ones you’ve done along with the Me262 and the Swiss 109’s. Was interesting and I’d like to see a followup!
@comsubpac4 жыл бұрын
The Wunderwaffels could have ended the war easily! They only had to be ready in July 1939, the Pilots name had to be Adolf H. and the engine had to fail mid air.
@insiainutorrt2594 жыл бұрын
-->Praise be saint stalin ruler of all evropa....pwaises upon us.... cus were out of food n praise is all weve got left...
@eaMCMLXXIX4 жыл бұрын
Today in Berlin and other cities exists Wonderwaffel shops even for civil customers.
@drfill92104 жыл бұрын
Kevin would have saved Germany
@dylanmilne66834 жыл бұрын
Top tier content. I feel like you're really on your stride now. You seem very comfortable on camera and provide a very informative approach whilst not letting the content itself become stuffy.
@planegaper4 жыл бұрын
BF 109 had the advantage of easy shipping, one could simply remove the wings and load a bunch onto rail cars, re assemble them in minutes, hence the narrow landing gear footprint.. it was thus imperative for the undercarriage to be part of the fuselage.. makes you wonder if the mechanics had go cart races with them prior to re attaching the wings.. either way rail transport, and the ability to fit through Germany's smallest tunnels was an integral part of the design process , one could even tow one behind a car or truck if needed, as it was no wider than a road lane .. that undercarriage is derided for catching out novice pilots, but having such an effective fighting machine so easy to bring to an air field in numbers ? more than balances out the cost , being able to tow a squadron to where it's needed in minutes, huge tactical advantage ..
@markgranger91503 жыл бұрын
The specifications for the aircraft was for a type that could be transported by rail the wings being removable made the 109 prone to fail in a high g turn. The comparison between spitfire and 109 in turning ability, the 109 should have been able to out turn the spit but german pilots were reluctant to test the.wings.strength. The narrow undercarriage was a major problem for the 109 losing pilot's and planes in accidents at the same rate as combat.The 109 had a big advantage over other fighters in maintenance you could replace the Db601 in an hour a spit or mustang was a long day for the ground crew to swap engines.
@wrathofatlantis23162 жыл бұрын
The Me-109G was rated to 13Gs absolute limit, and never broke. The P-51 was rated only 12Gs despite non-detachable wings, and broke them off frequently (or it’s tail)... The 109 was among the strongest, and the trim tail allowed faster high speed pull-outs than even the P-51 when trimmed tail heavy in advance.
@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles4 жыл бұрын
I am so excited. I can't wait to watch this. However I just woke up and have to go to work :(
@williamforbes69194 жыл бұрын
Here lies a comment from probably the best channel on KZbin.
@bhuf52754 жыл бұрын
Matthew McKellar. Agreed and very lucky to still have a job in the aviation industry. However Bismarck right up there and excellent video on Focke-Wulf. Can’t wait for the Fw200 video and hope he mentions the restoration work in Bremen and Hamburg of the sole remaining aircraft.
@siddharthiyer72444 жыл бұрын
Did you watch it yet? Amazing channel, much appreciation!
@drfill92104 жыл бұрын
I've seen Greg film in Germany from time to time- what happens if these two meet?
@roguerepublic17464 жыл бұрын
Thanks for giving us your sources Bis, I really appreciate it.
@luismaldonado14944 жыл бұрын
I like this new type of edit, less serious and more relaxed. Makes all things technical content much more fun to watch.
@simonolsen99954 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Creative production and editing made what could have been very dry into enjoyable and easy to take in. High standard of work indeed.
@JB-yb4wn4 жыл бұрын
This format is far more riveting than the diagram expo.
@MarvinT06064 жыл бұрын
He took everything he learned and built the mighty Ta-152 later on
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs4 жыл бұрын
The Ta 152 used about 57% Fw 190 parts. Some parts developed for the Ta 152, such as an enlarged tail were reintroduced into some Fw 190D. The speed limitation of the Fw 190A series above about 24000ft was that the BMW 801D engine only had a single stage non inter cooled super charger. The solution was the BMW 801R which had a two stage 4 speed inter cooled supercharger. It was to be fitted to a varian of the Ta 152C but bombing destroyed BMWs plans of producing the engine and hence the Ta 152 had to rely on the Jumo 213 or DB603.
@erojerisiz15714 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, the plane that had wings wider than the distance between the earth and the sun
@kingkrimson67033 жыл бұрын
@@erojerisiz1571 did you mean longer?
@hankw694 жыл бұрын
"...named Kevin." I have a friend named Kevin who is a former history teacher. Once, I asked his thoughts on how the world would be if Arch Duke Ferdinand had been spared in 1914. Kevin said that real history is fascinating enough without the 'what ifs'." In hindsight I couldn't agree more. Great show, as usual.
@Feiora4 жыл бұрын
But without the "What If"s nobody would bother examining history in the first place... Divergence is a wonderful thing, it allows one to go back over the histories and pick places in time that would have resulted in a different world. Sadly though, Serbia and Austria were going to have a war either way, the only difference size of the stage and the actors performing their roles, as well as the official date of what most likely would have still been World War One. Also, incidently I disagree with the World War titles as there have been plenty of large scale wars that happened on multiple fronts and they've never been listed as World War, so why should what we call World War One and Two be named as such?
@insiainutorrt2594 жыл бұрын
Thats called religious fanaticism in churches ... and is frowned upon even there... why the is that behaviour encouraged in shools...
@bartfoster13114 жыл бұрын
@@Feiora I agree with you that WW1 would have happened if the assassination hadn't happened but I cannot think of any other wars that included every continent except Antarctica. Also, most countries were involved, even if they claimed to be neutral.
@Feiora4 жыл бұрын
@@bartfoster1311 Well it depends on when and where and what and who was involved, if we judge World War as requiring every single continent then to some degree all wars are World Wars on the basis that the hostile parties had to cross oceans to get at each other. Then there's the subset of culture and philosophy, but that's something for another day when I'm more awake. For now though think on this, what exactly are the parameters for the World War designation? Does it mean enlisting foreign nations and their fighting men and women to battle your opponent? If that's the case the American Revolution was a "World War" as both sides had foreign forces involved, and these foreign forces had to cross an ocean to reach the battlefield... Also, by this definition, the Crusades could be considered "World Wars" even if only a part of the forces traveled by ship while the rest went by land... And there are more wars that fit that definition, but I'm going to stop here to see what your reply is.
@hugostiglitz73734 жыл бұрын
I have to say that when I first saw the 159 in the thumbnail, I immediately thought of the Storch. Interesting to see that the 159 is related to it. I can't wait for your video on the Condor. Keep up the good work. Heiss Gut!
@malusignatius4 жыл бұрын
"And if the pilot was called Kevin." *Cue me collapsing in a fit of giggles.*
@cannonfodder43764 жыл бұрын
A video I did not think I needed but an informative one none the less. Tells quite the story of its own and puts the Fw-190 and Kurt Tank's contributions into perspective. Great work Bismarck.
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Zajuts1494 жыл бұрын
Speaking of the Fw-190, has Greg made any videos lately? I haven't seen any notifications. Hope everything is ok with him.
@mistysowards73654 жыл бұрын
I believe he did a special on the long nose FW190/TA152 w all the late war turbochargers/superchargers w all the different altitudes w each turbo/supercharger gear engaged all in a spreadsheet and also looked at the Methonol / water injections in concert w supercharger/ turbo at extremely high altitudes.. I'll say this: Very impressive performance even at 40,000 ft and higher!!!!!! lol midblowing
@rednaughtstudios4 жыл бұрын
Ha. He's in the comments a few hours after you.
@senorsalami2 жыл бұрын
Just wanted to say thank you Chris, after a long day of dealing with idiots I enjoy relaxing watching your videos and learning from your knowledge and passion for each topic and presentation. Well done sir
@anthonywilson48734 жыл бұрын
The opposition pilots said it for you. They were there they had to fight it, they saw it as step up from the ME 109. UK had to develop the Spitfire further to counter it. Among other things they went up from the Merlin to the Griffin engine, temporarily they had to super tune the Merlin as a stopgap. Good presentation again. Very efficient design
@wfp93784 жыл бұрын
Nice to see the FW189. You should cover the Blohm and Voss BV 141 some time and compare to the FW 189. I really wish I had snagged the old Airfix kit as it was such a wacky looking plane.
@wwiiinplastic47124 жыл бұрын
I am actually building Revell's F8 model in 1/32 right now. I am depicting 'White 11' of 1./JG SG4 when it was in Italy during summer 1944. This plane was originally in splinter but was painted over in Sandgelb and Dunkelgrün mottling upon arrival, which totally obscured all the stenciling and the swastikas on the tail, as well as the upper half of the fuselage band and the Balkenkreuz on the upper wing surfaces. The Butcher Bird is my favorite German fighter of the war, with the Hellcat my favorite Allied.
@Bochi424 жыл бұрын
Small point, but you somewhat glossed over the Fw190 V1 was a pretty ambitious and unproven concept to streamline a radial engined plane that I don't think anyone had ever tried before though. So Tank didn't limit himself to using only proven design features it's just that the original design in that case failed so horribly and was then amended into something better and more practical.
@thelonious22134 жыл бұрын
Awesome, as always. Can't wait for the Fw-200 Condor!!!
@drfill92104 жыл бұрын
Good you mentioned Greg in this video. It may be that you two will now affect the common perception of this aircraft.
@villesaarenketo25064 жыл бұрын
Exciting to see that many of those pics were taken in Finland.
@hanskc33024 жыл бұрын
SA-Kuva is great archive, I love to explore it.
@mfk16734 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Bismarck, for this sober and incisive history of the beautiful and awesome FW 190.
@antothemanto774 жыл бұрын
In Aces High, a combat flight sim, I very much prefer the 109’s handling characteristics. It’s hard to master, but in the context of that game, it’s a more versatile fighter in terms of air to air combat. Especially when using techniques like snap rolls, rolling scissors, or generally just using the climb rate to outdo your opponents, it is a wonderful plane. I realize it’s nearly not the same as real life though. Just my two cents!
@confusedson4 жыл бұрын
The FW-187 (only 9 built) was actually used in Norway (mostly as a propaganda ruse to make the Allies think that it was entering service), and was found to be quite superior to the BF-110. However, it was cancelled due to the Luftwaffe seeing no value in a long range fighter (which was more expensive than a BF-109) rather than for any technical shortcomings.
@bobdyer4224 жыл бұрын
You do your homework. Impressive, one of the best on line. Sense of humor also, Kool. Fw family is my favorite Axis AC. Great job, thanks & Congrats
@RaduB.4 жыл бұрын
Incredibly interesting story! I was put off for so long by the unappealing title... I didn't want to find out about the failures of Focke Wulf but I am glad to have learned about the history of the company.
@kvproductions25814 жыл бұрын
US Pilot: We're winning the war! German Pilot: Hey there friends, my name is kevin! US Pilot: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH! *explodes causing a chain reaction that destroys the whole US air force*
@Haftergohn4 жыл бұрын
And the planes falling out of the sky crash Into their ships which causes the whole fleet to be lost
@kerrygeist12614 жыл бұрын
Great video. I'm a little surprised you didn't mention the affiliation of the American ITT Corporation and Focke Wulf. The ITT Corporation was the largest shareholder in Focke Wulf at one point. That's a pretty interesting story by itself.
@MrWarwick154 жыл бұрын
Great work, as usual! Thank you. Rich.
@glynwelshkarelian34894 жыл бұрын
Good video. I grew up in a Sussex (SE England) town called Crawley, in the 60's. There were still a building being held up with weird, massive, bits of wood that I discovered were as a result of a hit and run FW 190 raid, that missed the railway by a few dozen metres, but hit the Post Office big stylee.
@ketanca13 жыл бұрын
just watched several of your KZbin postings - Excellent !
@PaddyPatrone4 жыл бұрын
very detailed insight, thx
@peyiots6 ай бұрын
I commend you on your progress in presentation and your historical research. Clearly dedicated to your vocation.
@kittyhawk97074 жыл бұрын
I am glad the FW189 Uhu got a shout out ..in my mind that is THE best FW design of the war.. It was popular , did it's job very well and was a difficult opponent to be up against. that is not to say the FW190 was bad..but it was overshadowed in peoples minds by the BF109 ..just like our Hurricane was compared to the Spitfire...
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
17:30
@kittyhawk97074 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory oh I saw it my friend.. I was saying I am glad you mentioned it :) ..
@rafale19814 жыл бұрын
That look at aviation companies is really interesting! Like to see more!
@naamadossantossilva47364 жыл бұрын
.Pop history flies over this and makes it seem like someday Kurt Tank woke up and designed the best plane the germans had.
@tomasinacovell42933 жыл бұрын
Tank was probably trying to bring back something like a later day Fokker D-VIII, but his parasol fighters are absolutely elegant and graceful looking making them wonderful to aeromodel.
@joebuchanan38084 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for a very informative look at the Focke-Wulf company.
@WildBillCox134 жыл бұрын
Kevin FTW! We tried to produce a perfect pilot by mating him with another top test pilot, but Hanna said he was "too clean cut" for her.
@johnbergin18024 жыл бұрын
I did not expect Focke-wulf to start out like how it did.
@vipertwenty2494 жыл бұрын
A detailed series of videos on the development of the FW190 from drawing board to the end of WW2 would be a good idea, going through the trials and early development of the aircraft and the adaptations to changing requirements and circumstances over time. The same has been done on the iconic allied aircraft and to a degree on the Bf109 series, but the Fw190 seems to get overlooked in this coverage. Thanks for another excellent video.
@John-ch4wv4 жыл бұрын
Excellent Video. Business History is so Fascinating. I Hope you continue to make more videos like this
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@ThroneOfBhaal4 жыл бұрын
Kevin. The highest scoring Luftwaffe ace you've never heard of.
@stevecrossman72934 жыл бұрын
Kevin happens to be my favourite fighter Pilot! Insightful video as always.
@tyronrossouw444 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thank you.
@martentrudeau69484 жыл бұрын
Very interesting history about Focke Wulf and Kurt Tank, this explains why the Fw 190 designed/ built the way it was. Fw 190 looks right and proved to be right, one of the best of WW2.
@fliegeroh4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Hoping to see the FW-200.
@johanrunfeldt71743 жыл бұрын
There is an anecdote about Kurt Tank that puts some light on his prowess both as an aircraft designer and as a pilot. In the summer of 1942 he took a tour to fighter units based in France and the Low Countries to talk with actual pilots who had flown the 10 in combat and get hints about what improvements would be valuable to them. While flying home to Bremen in his Fw58 Weihe, he is attacked by a section of Spitfires over the Dutch coast. He manages to outmaneuver the Spits until they have to abort due to fuel shortage and when he lands he has 59 bullet holes in his aircraft, but none in any vital systems and he is uninjured himself.
@Rhinozherous4 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about your very interesting looking book collection behind you in the Video? I always look out for something to read about the airwar or airplanes in general. It would be nice to see what are your nr1 books or which books you can recommend! And thank you for another awesome Video!
@kiwihame4 жыл бұрын
Superb Video Chris. Well done. Sehr interresant!
@joehaigh75294 жыл бұрын
Great Video! I was always fascinated by Kurt Tank as I am someone who is studying Aerospace Engineering (well, was studying Aerospace Engineering untill the Pandemic struck). I am curious as to how the proven concepts He created combined with the last of the advanced data He received before the war ended influenced his postwar designs like the Pulqi II and the Indian Marut. He wouldn't have had access to the latest of R&D as someone outside of the system at that point. He had more than enough when in Argentina, but I dont know when He was in India. Could more Data had prevented his later designs being mitigated to obsolescence ?
@chrisallen1243 жыл бұрын
I'm always very impressed by your incredible knowledge!
@nongmosalt31404 жыл бұрын
dude your office space is so damn cozy for a history nerd, the only thing i would change would be the color of the walls
@964cuplove Жыл бұрын
Greg’s airplanes has some really nice episodes about the FW 190 !!
@martentrudeau69484 жыл бұрын
The Focke-Wulf Fw 190 and The Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor are two of my all time favorite airplanes. And both were designed Kurt Tank.
@ditto19584 жыл бұрын
I used to play the original Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator In that sim the FW-190 was really, really hard to shoot down compared to every other plane you could fly against
@willowpitts65394 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great video looking forward to the next one
@mabbrey4 жыл бұрын
great vid biz
@markdavis24754 жыл бұрын
The FW159 reminds me of the dodgy prototype plane in the finale of the "Blue Max"!
@V-V1875-h4 жыл бұрын
I like the Fokkerwulf 190, I saw one at Gatow Airfield, absolutely gorgeous plane
@ralphyznaga17613 жыл бұрын
GREAT video! You are amazing. Thanks for Austin, Texas.
@shannonwittman9504 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video with thorough and interesting research! I'm a big fan of Germany's military aircraft, both before and during the war. I guess we postwar armchair types always think of German excellence in research and development which often resulted in great airplanes such as the Bucker Jungmann. I'm particularly interested in Germany's variety of bombers, and the fact that they chose to go with light and medium bombers. Seemingly never any serious thought to large bombers to match America's B-17 and B-24, and Britain's Lancaster and Stirling. We just don't think of some of the wackier German designs such as you've shown in this video. Looking forward to your Condor video. Thanks for this one!
@DerKurfuerst4 жыл бұрын
A video about the company of my hometown on my birthday. Thx Bis :*
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
How many did you build yet?
@DerKurfuerst4 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory not enough but appx 10 in stock
@finefriendzz4 жыл бұрын
The biplane at 9:49 has registration D-EMOF. Wich is dutch for "the Hun" (de mof). It also seems to be flying above a landscape that could very well be dutch.. Story anyone?
@thenevadadesertrat27134 жыл бұрын
I am Dutch. I did not know that MOF means HUN. To me it always was just German or maybe Kraut, but never Hun.
@facundoperis94884 жыл бұрын
Super interesting video and very informative, professional as always! Greetings from Argentina, a country that operated many Fw44.
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
Why thank you
@brianreddeman9514 жыл бұрын
...and also the country with Kurt Tank's two jet designs. One is still on display there?
@facundoperis94884 жыл бұрын
@@brianreddeman951 both of them are at display, the pulqui 1 and pulqui 2, the first one ws mainly designed by the famous french designer whose name i cant remember haha, i think it we has the designer of the D520 and its ancestors.
@facundoperis94884 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory thanks to you for the amazing content!
@paulmanson2534 жыл бұрын
@@facundoperis9488 Dewoitine.
@moseszero32814 жыл бұрын
5:36 - would love to see that design in an alternate history WWII movie.
@leifvejby80233 жыл бұрын
Must be a project for somebody with an x-plane simulator!
@libertyman37294 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the history of the "Butcher Bird". I always loved that plane. 🇺🇸
@mikehunt34364 жыл бұрын
Kurt Tank was an impressive designer, even beyond his WW2 designs and the Pulqui II in Argentina, he designed the Hindustan Marut, which was so well designed for a super-sonic fighter, the IAF used it as ground support aircraft in the 1972 war.
@mikehunt34364 жыл бұрын
@Mialisus I think something like that happened on more than one occaision, but the more famous one was when he flew a Ta 152 and then use the methanol boost to ditch the mustangs. The other time, I think, is he flew one of the prototype FW187s during defense of the FW factory from an allied raid in 1943.
@wrathofatlantis23162 жыл бұрын
Rall: “The 109 was a rapier, the 190 a saber.” The 109 was best used for hit and run, the 190 for slow speed turn fighting : Red Fleet, Feb 1943: “ They interact in the following manner: the109 performed hit and run attacks from above, the 190, lower down, inevitably offered turning combat at a minimum speed. “
@alexbell94433 жыл бұрын
The FW 190 Dora models and TA-152 have to be some of the most beautiful planes of ww2
@donnyboon28964 жыл бұрын
Excellent videos!!!
@steverobinson6524 жыл бұрын
Best close captioning ever!
@rogerarmstrong88932 жыл бұрын
My dad worked on the railroad after ww2 and told me many many flat cars of German and Japanese aircraft were shipped out to airfields in nevada and Arizona to be evaluated and studied. Our military were very astute in evaluating and studying there aircraft jets and conventional aircraft.
@slick44014 жыл бұрын
The FW190 was one of the the 3rd Reich's very few Kalashnikov moments.
@Ni9994 жыл бұрын
I tried. I'm unable to follow. How so?
@miquelescribanoivars50494 жыл бұрын
@@Ni999 Reliable, durable, easy to use, relatively cheap and easy to mass-produce.
@Ni9994 жыл бұрын
@@miquelescribanoivars5049 Thanks for explaining that. I wish I'd never asked.
@kopperhed44724 жыл бұрын
The Achilles heel of the Fw 58 was the landing gear as well; you always see photos of the aircraft buckled and sitting on broken legs.
@terrygrady76834 жыл бұрын
Hi Biz...Could you talk about Luftwaffe fighter pilots' preferences of one fighter type to another?
@Deltaskuid4 жыл бұрын
Eine Frage: Auf der FW F19 Ente bei 04:12 ist die Kennung D-1960, wie wir sie heute bei Segelflugzeugen haben. Ist das zu diesem Zeitpunkt eine normale Kennung für Motorflugzeuge? Gab es schon damals eine Klassifizierung der Maschinen in der Kennung?
@enscroggs4 жыл бұрын
17:38 What are those fins or vanes on the prop spinner? In Bismarck's video on the subject of the Bf-109's landing gear, we see some footage of an Me-108 Taifun in Swiss livery which also has a spinner like this.
@jeffmoore94874 жыл бұрын
I don't know - air speed indicator - alternative to the pitot tube?
@AtomicBabel4 жыл бұрын
Those fins were a feature of the Argus AS 410 engine. Apparently, they power the variable pitch propellet! Seen them before on the HS129 prototype and an Arado, but did not know. So thank you for giving me an opportunity to learn something new.
@thebadshave5034 жыл бұрын
It says a lot about how dangerous these relatively early planes were that 'I'm willing to get into it first' was grounds for partnership.
@chuckschillingvideos4 жыл бұрын
The ultimate evolution of the FW-190 , the TA-152, is, in my opinion, the most beautiful aircraft ever designed.
@martentrudeau69484 жыл бұрын
Fantastic history, that has everything to do with what the FW 190 was, a beautiful fighter.
@jasontrauger85154 жыл бұрын
I'm curious, "Bismark". Would the Bf 109 have been more successful, had Messerschmidt built it, with the same design goals, as the Fw 190?
@Leon_der_Luftige4 жыл бұрын
The 109 was about as successful as it could have been, don't you think?
@Feiora4 жыл бұрын
@@Leon_der_Luftige Nah it could have been better, but it had to take on roles it was meant to do and the design changes wreaked havoc on its performance... And incidentally if the 109 could have performed as well as Spitfire or better, the germans would have won the air war...
@matthiuskoenig33784 жыл бұрын
@@Feiora “…the Me 109F has a slightly superior performance to the Spitfire V” - Air Vice Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory, September 1941. “I also thought the Bf 109F was slightly superior to the Spitfire V”, - Squadron Leader Douglas Bader, circa 1941. the british believed the BF109 was the better plane during the important part of the air war (1940-41), and at least at low altitude (where most combat was fought in this period) the BR 109 is better, with a more powerful engine (109E had 200hp more than the spitfire 1A) and could perform maneuvers that would make the Spitfire IA and spitfire V engines stall (specifically high-G turns and nose dives). which combined with a higher climb rate gave 109 pilots a greater ability to engage and disengage and generally manuvre than the spitfire's smaller turning circle on a horizontal plane. BF109s also had superior gun sights greatly increaseing hit ratios and reduced pilot load (due to more automation) allowing for greater focus on the battle (which arguably reduces the effects of a slightly worse canopy). the spitfire won the airwar over Britian because it was over Britian, not because it was the superior fighter. downed pilots were more likely to return, and they had a shorter distance to fly to the fight (thus longer combat times). the BF109 would need to greatly exceed the spitfire in range to account for the latter.
@miquelescribanoivars50494 жыл бұрын
Old comment, but you have to remember the Bf-109 is a much older design than the FW-190, coming only about a year after the I-16 (the first fighter monoplane with retractable landing gear to enter mass production). Back then streamlined in-line designs were all the rage and therefore the Bf-109 was designed with lots of thought regarding its aerodynamics as well as strategic aspects (easy to mass produce, transport,...), which may had compromised other aspects. The fact that the Bf-109 managed to remain competitive in its role in the luftwaffe for nearly a decade shows that, in spite of its flaws, it was an extremely adaptable design.
@martynmurray89274 жыл бұрын
Thank you youtube for recommending this got yourself a new subscriber 🏴
@paststeve14 жыл бұрын
Great video once AGAIN! Thanks!
@paulfreeborn14933 жыл бұрын
Lol--wow, I had never considered how the alignment of the planets affected the air war in Europe before! :-) Always enjoy your videos--thanks!
@TOMAS-lh4er4 жыл бұрын
" AND THE PILOT WAS CALLED KEVIN " !! Ha,HA !!( 1:26 ) And If Herman had flown it himself !!