A concrete example of this is - when he was at the Oak Ridge Lab, he was shown a complicted schematic of a manufacturing process. He found the weak point of the process even though he was not an industrial engineer. Because he applied the concepts of critical paths and flow.
@lukex1910 ай бұрын
In his memoir he admitted he was just bullshitting-he had no idea what was going on, but they expected him to review the blueprints so he faked it (he's a very good faker). There's probably something to be said about his intuition, but he did not actively apply any concepts in the scenario.
@Akagami7537 ай бұрын
@@lukex19 where did you read this, The memoir?
@lukex197 ай бұрын
@@Akagami753 yes. Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman
@fatbagz9577 ай бұрын
In this book “the pleasure of finding this out” he told that story and said he just randomly pointed to a part of the blueprint and said “what happens if this valve is shut off” then the engineers said something like “holy shit, how’d you see that after looking at it for 2 secs” he didn’t tell them this but in the book he said it was just a guess
@Akagami7535 ай бұрын
@@fatbagz957 Oh Hey, thanks!
@lunam7249 Жыл бұрын
1.5x video speed will also help you learning faster...at 2x 👏👏👏👏
@TerryHughes-u4m9 ай бұрын
My approach, and that of many colleagues, has been that to learn a subject, teach it. That's essentially what this is saying, and it really does work! Nicely done.
@priscillawrites66854 ай бұрын
Feynman was a synesthete. He saw numbers with their own colors, in three dimensional space in front of him. His teaching technique was based in no small part on the unique creative organization of his mind.
@Uhhhhh-b1l8 ай бұрын
trying this out today, I have just under one month until I'm eligible to qualify for my FAA A&P test, last semester was a little shakey which is why I want to review what I learned last semester so Im more comfortable walking into the test. Hope it goes well for me ahhhh
@ahm3dSalman Жыл бұрын
1. Explain the concepts in your own words,
@snazzyquizzes233610 ай бұрын
Great advice, well explained. Thanks!
@liz_0048 ай бұрын
1)Teach it simply: Pretend to teach the concept or topic to someone else in simple terms. If you can't explain it clearly, you might not understand it well enough. 2)Identify knowledge gaps: While teaching, note down areas where you struggle or can't explain clearly. These are your knowledge gaps that need further study. 3) Review and simplify: Go back to your study materials and fill in the gaps in your understanding. Simplify complex ideas and explanations until you can explain them clearly in your own words.
@JefferyFrimpong-ee8gi Жыл бұрын
Hardwork and believe can also do
@Kanu0102 Жыл бұрын
what a good video
@devonbrockhaus655410 ай бұрын
I like. Yet, it's an issue of having the volume of time necessary to pull it off. I think the first method is what is typically emphasized as it requires no real teaching to say "rote memorize". If teaching required a methodology that worked for all, that is consuming only a fair amount of time in the minimum context of a students other classes, things would have to change. It's in patronizing misrecognition of the logistics that a lot of what isn't working gets perpetuated.
@HeavenlyDemonLord7 ай бұрын
wow, this is interesting I agree, people say critical thinking is important, but they do not emphasize it enough
@beksman0284 Жыл бұрын
thanks
@bloomones Жыл бұрын
Subscribe if you like it
@franciscobustamante33269 ай бұрын
I’m still confused, how do know I learned enough of the topic? Especially in nursing Pharmacology? Is there a video to learn and dissect a chapter or lecture?
@horaciogomez43683 ай бұрын
Concept: pharmacology Learn as much as you can Third: “teach it” to someone else. 4th. Review what you don’t understand. Then go back to point 3. 5th. Write it down on your own words and review it. (Basically the act of writing it will help your brain to memorize the information)
@elasen30877 ай бұрын
This is the UPSC level learning
@sudheertranslator3026 ай бұрын
Thank you
@jeseayala6080 Жыл бұрын
bruh what a good video
@MeaHeaR4 ай бұрын
I use it to be biuld a Sué Flay
@xx_deezznutzz_xx582 Жыл бұрын
nice
@bloomones Жыл бұрын
Subscribe if you like it
@jeffknott19756 ай бұрын
You know you truely understand something when you can explain it simply to laymen!
@ashwinkumarsharma7888Ай бұрын
👍🎉💐✨♾️
@luisamendes818111 ай бұрын
I love Feynman and I enjoyed the video but…. Isn’t that obvious? I’ve always did that. I wasn’t aware of Feynman existence when I was younger. Instead a child I used to teach my cat or my mother. I’m a journalist. I write plain and simple things I was able to understand. I’ve never written anything I could not understand until the deadline. I just can’t. And sometimes you don’t understand because It’s simply wrong. I would say almost every time is inaccurate
@UserSOF011 ай бұрын
yes, you are right i think when people wanted to write about this method they didn't want to explain it every time so they named it Feynmans method
@luisamendes818111 ай бұрын
@@UserSOF0 I see. I’m not disagreeing with anyone. But some people meant that they had never realised that finding your own way to explain is inherently to understanding. I think our dearest Feynman meant that you need to find a victim 😆to keep explaining on and on. I disturb mine by WhatsApp correcting and improving the explanations. I talk so much that my interlocutor often doesn’t even answer and I am already changing the text. Or he doesn’t want to know. Or has no time. Or he is not understanding because my explanations are bad or wrong. Half of time I am wrong and I am improving. Actually what my poor fried thinks does not matter to the act of learning. It’s even funnier. It’s impossible for me to feel that I understand something if I am not having fun. And… Are you still there 🤣?
@katebloggs824310 ай бұрын
Boy, if this is not generated by AI, the humans behind it should be embarrassed by the major duplications, plus resummarizing what was already repeated twice. Sad. Totally ironic that it repeats itself in slightly different words, given what it says Feynman says. Bubblegum may not have nutrients but at least it is fun.
@DMBall11 күн бұрын
Yet, if his biographer James Gleick is correct, Feynman wasn't a very good teacher. And in certain reprehensible cases, he engaged in behavior that would have gotten him fired under today's guidelines.
@curtnicol37563 ай бұрын
AI content, but not as bad as most. so it has some (but only some) value.
@saikrishnan_2809Ай бұрын
How did you find out it was AI content??
@gardenjoy52234 ай бұрын
This is UTTERLY BORING and didn't teach me a thing. Just a lot of words, words, words. And then rehearse them. What you needed were practical real life explanations. They lacked completely.
@brucenome9895 ай бұрын
This wasn't helpful at all.
@-Christoph10 ай бұрын
With the feynman technique that video would have been just two minutes long. ⏱