So.... you still looking for more concentrated peroxide ?? 👀
@integza3 жыл бұрын
You bet your ass I am 🤩
@gamerduck37073 жыл бұрын
@@integza xdd
@TopAnimeRating3 жыл бұрын
Isnt there something better than peroxide... maybe something yellow?
@mrnice44343 жыл бұрын
@@TopAnimeRating Yellow tomato's?
@ExplosionsAndFire3 жыл бұрын
@@geekswithfeet9137 haha yeah all theoretical of course. Haha yeah haha just having a laugh , no need to tag ASIO haha (please)
@ghosttheoremproductions54693 жыл бұрын
Catalytic reactions are typically directly proportional to the surface area of the catalyst. Swap those beads of silver for silver mesh and place in the nozzle. H2O2 which doesn't react with the KMnO4 (common, due to the violent nature of the reaction and limitations on reaction vessel volume) will get another reaction chance with the silver (it also promotes mixing). Also, a bit of tweaking to the design of your reaction chamber and mixer will help limit the backflow issue you're having. For the mixer, redesign to make it conical around the nozzle (the cone going IN to the chamber) and for the reaction chamber you can add angled (baffled) steps to the side so that expanding gasses favor moving towards the walls of the chamber and nozzle (this also reinforces the chamber which allows you to make it thinner/lighter). Beyond that, you just need to get the H2O2/KMnO2 ratio correct and figure pump(s). Bonus points if you put Tesla valves between the pump(s) and mixer to further limit pressure backflow. - Video idea: Steam Rocket Engine 2.0
@skybirdprojects54893 жыл бұрын
Redsigning the injector for higher pressures so that the catalyst and catalyzer can be atomized before mixing would help.
@Bigwings20433 жыл бұрын
I think the reason his test at the beginning didn’t work so well was because of the lack of surface area.
@satriahanifrofi97983 жыл бұрын
Anjay
@pabloarroyo10233 жыл бұрын
The silver is also likely oxidized, limiting the amount of actual catalizing that occurs. Putting the potassium permanganate in a blender to make the particles more fine may also be smart so surface area is increased.
@ghosttheoremproductions54693 жыл бұрын
@@pabloarroyo1023 - Silver doesn't oxidize by itself as it has an incredibly low affinity for oxygen. The most common oxides are all dark so the silver wouldn't be shiny if it were anyways. As for grinding up the potassium permanganate, that would only be necessary if he's not dissolving it all in water. 5g per 100ml at room temp is it's solubility.
@hufca3 жыл бұрын
Do not use syringes, use pressurized tanks instead! Take two pressure tanks for propellants, and third tank just for compressed air (a few bar in Coke bottle should be ok). Connect both tanks to third one using some valves. When valves open, high pressure air will push the H2O2 and catalyst out of them into the chamber. This is safer since you can close the valve in case of emergency. This also would provide better control of the mixing ratio. Also a good idea would be to use check-valves to prevent incidents of pressure backflow from chamber.
@MartII89NL3 жыл бұрын
Yes and maybe CO2 canisters instead of air pressure. Although with the speed of the reaction it might be difficult to control.
@hufca3 жыл бұрын
@@MartII89NL I didn't mean to control it in real time, but to adjust the flow rate of ingredients before the test (some sort of pipe narrowing or half opened valves). And since the ingredients used by Integza aren't flammable, I think CO2 would be redundant.
@Scavage00013 жыл бұрын
Think this will only work if he have the two chemical in 2 Ball shape Tanks, because of the pressure aerea. But also there need to be checkvalves so that the whole think could only react in the chamber, remember that there is a lot of pressure in the rocket
@larryfigerbutz71843 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure you guys are describing a super soaker
@m4vr1ck3 жыл бұрын
@@larryfigerbutz7184 a super soaker on steroids crack and meth because the rocket engine will have significantly higher pressures to deal with but yes same basic concept
@hawkercnc82613 жыл бұрын
Two points about rediscovering old chemistry. I am a lot older than you and our chemistry teacher in 1966 was working during WWII in developing 100 vol hydrogen peroxide for use in rockets etc. He was called Dr Roper. As far as I know the V1 a heavy brute of a rocket needed to be shoved up into the sky at reasonable speed before it would fly off it’s pulse jet. This was achieved as aircraft on an aircraft carrier. That is a tube with a slot along the top on which the rocket sat on top of cylindrical slug. The slug was propelled up the launch tube by the mixture you are describing. The slug fell away in front of the launcher. There is one by the road visible through the hedge at Duxford Museum near Cambridge UK. The steam generator is also there with quite a number of chambers and pipes to hold and control the chemistry. The are bound to be pictures somewhere of it perhaps on Wikipedia.
@sidoslaven20563 жыл бұрын
A good idea might be to keep using the two syringes and have a small yet powerful electric motor( low KV, 150-350 KV probably ) and a setscrew to simultaneously push on both plungers. If the speed of the motor is to high, i recommend printing a gearbox to increase torque while slowing down the rate of fuel consumption. I understand that this complicates things a great deal, but hey...it's Nazi rocket science, what did you expect? Anyhoe, well done! Keep up the good work.
@mariuscodori1933 жыл бұрын
You would need to control the reaction better... Slowing down and speeding up the movement of the serine won't help. The reaction speed is only one, to use some kind of gearbox, you whould need to convert the energy, like he mentioned, in an steam engine way...
@erick41883 жыл бұрын
Maybe for the pumps a stepper motor and leadscrew on a syringe might work
@matsv2013 жыл бұрын
Probobly easier with a pressure tank. Its not much displacement needed
@vernonvouga58693 жыл бұрын
To follow up on this, what about the proportions between the catalyst and chemical, do you need less peroxide, or more? How about a hydraulic system with a proportioning valve that uses two hydraulic rams pushing the syringes?
@Liedson90003 жыл бұрын
To add my own convoluted yet I believe highly functional method: Pressurize both liquids into separate canisters using a compressor machine at home, and then use electronic controlled valves to release the high-pressure liquid. This allows you to fine control the amount of each coming out, as well as increase their speed upon contact thus mixing them better. The valves would be controlled by something like a raspberry pico or an Arduino. I know this method is very convoluted and complex, however, it is the best I can come up with right now. Saudações portuguesas, ó grande enginheiro!
@benjaminmiddaugh27293 жыл бұрын
There's something so gratifying about watching someone who clearly isn't mentally prepared for the reaction they are initiating.
@JohnnyWednesday3 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah? tell Robert Oppenheimer that.
@benjaminmiddaugh27293 жыл бұрын
@@JohnnyWednesday I think everyone involved in **that** project was quite mentally prepared for what they were doing, even if they didn't fully appreciate all the implications at the time.
@The_Mimewar3 жыл бұрын
In chem 2, we made Nitrogen tri iodide (NI3) and one of the people in back “made too much” so she threw three filters SOAKED in NI3 in the trash next to their bench. 10 mins later we start hearing popping and snapping from the bag as her trash bin started giving off brown purple vapor and calmly exploding.
Except for when they're killed or horribly injured. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_trichloride#Safety
@PlasmaChannel3 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to use a FLIR and see how much heat the steam produces, in real time, plus see the primary catalyst points. Good job brother!
@elonmusk91033 жыл бұрын
What material did you use for the sla resin printing?
@colemank1233 жыл бұрын
that is an awesome idea
@pRaX858153 жыл бұрын
I personally prefer the Trijicon REAP-IR... I'll see myself out.
@redneckshaman30992 жыл бұрын
I'm addicted to pigger nussy 😎
@Lampe2020 Жыл бұрын
1:27 I have a fuel, I have oxidizer, Ugh, fast combustion! I have a pipe, I have some lids, Ugh, rocket shell! Fast combustion, rocket shell, Hugh hugh ahh, hugh ha-ugh, combustion thing that flies away!
@Lampe2020 Жыл бұрын
I first noticed this on the second watch because I didn't know PPAP when I first saw this video. I don't know if Integza actually intended this reference or if I misinterpreted it...
@owenkegg56083 жыл бұрын
I love how he didn't even want to talk about a hypergolic rocket engines. Scary stuff.
@DFX2KX3 жыл бұрын
He kinda does, H202 is hypergolic in some reactions (the concentrations the Nazi's used in the 163, for instance). Generally though, hypergolic fuels are insanely toxic. As are some monopropellants Hydrazine is an example. It's one of the byproducts of mixing bleach and ammonia, to put that in perspective.
@Cheebzsta3 жыл бұрын
"Well, it's all the same dangers of monopropellent rockets but it's also made out of *EXPLOSIVE POISON!* :D"
@daniel_f40503 жыл бұрын
The Luftwaffe found that out really quickly. Fuel that melts the pilot and explodes if the ground crew sneezes really isn’t a winner. Particularly if you are meant to attack things that shoot back with lots of .50 caliber machine guns.
@frogz3 жыл бұрын
I WANT TO KNOW THE STORY BEHIND THIS THOUGH!!!
@gokuta3333 жыл бұрын
@@frogz Just search up the ME 163 Documentary. Super Scary Stuff. I think there were more pilot deaths due to them literally exploding and being burned (Or better put, eaten) alive on the runway, than to enemy attack.
@MakersMuse3 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing the test footage of one going full vertical and absolutely losing my mind - the interview with Hanna Reitsch is really interesting. They use hydrogen peroxide for some rocket drag cars - make a mini one! :O
@integza3 жыл бұрын
How about I make a big one? Muahahahahah
@Redditard3 жыл бұрын
@@integza 9:08 धन्यवाद* No offence lol made me soooo happy :)
@MakersMuse3 жыл бұрын
@@integza ohyessss!
@RobertSzasz3 жыл бұрын
@@integza high proof hydrogen peroxide is scary stuff. If you want to avoid the drama of solid catalyst beds, spraying a high pressure jet of KMnO4(aq) against a jet of H2O2 would probably be the easiest way to get fast mixing.
@madzak98473 жыл бұрын
When I was 12 i made a lot of firecrackers mixing potassium permarganate (марганцовка) with aluminum powder (there was a lot of it, used as paint in soviet times) and some matches heads for primer , when the mix is right you get nice big explosion shining like supernova, when it’s wrong boom is much smaller but it shoots permarganate crystals in all directions they getting stuck in the clothes and when you wash it magic happens :all of your clothes are covered with 5mm holes and/or pink spots …) , you also can make rocket from that mix but it can blow up)
@Retanaru3 жыл бұрын
"I don't know why I only stop when things go bad" Test until failure is a common strategy, we don't typically include humans in the failure mode though.
@MouseGoat3 жыл бұрын
we don't, but they definitely are.
@guerrillaradio99533 жыл бұрын
Including them physically, no. However, mentally, we are always the overall failure mode.
@mukulkumar1303 жыл бұрын
i stop when it break down
@DarrylAdams3 жыл бұрын
"All great science end in explosions!" Andy Weir
@among-us-999993 жыл бұрын
Testing isn’t finished until the prototype is destroyed.
@Mr.Meme013 жыл бұрын
Dude the quality of the editing of this is amazing. And the unobstructed confidence when delivering lines, even during the zoom ins, is legendary.
@V3NQM693 жыл бұрын
I see a Tesla valve coming in handy in preventing the flow back pressure to the syringe! That would be in true Integza style!
@khatarnaakstuff63923 жыл бұрын
Yeah bro you are very clever to think like this
@javiermartin7873 жыл бұрын
Integza: "For the first time in history, something good came out of Nazi research" NASA: Am I A Joke To You???
@marcalhuoya88003 жыл бұрын
NASAs rockets are all derived from the v2 a nazi rocket from WW2
@justbeeeb20613 жыл бұрын
@TASC Aerospace Its not nice to say that.
@tinkukuty12323 жыл бұрын
Saturn V wouldn't have happened without Werner Von Braun and Operation Paperclip! So yes something good came out of German scientific talent not from Nazi research. Braun initially approached Nazi ministry to fund his space research program and they put him into rocketry development for military projects. Not saying that he isn't culpable, but at least his initial intention wasn't to build rockets for Wermacht
@@tinkukuty1232 I definitely agree with your distinction between German scientific talent and the unfortunate way it was put to use by the Nazis. I don't think it's fair to say rockets as sophisticated as Saturn V wouldn't have happened though. Reaction engines date back to antiquity, and as you say, German engineers (as well as engineers the world over) were certainly up to the task. It was just a matter of time and the will to do it. It's just too bad people can almost never see fit to muster that level of will unless it's in service of a military agenda in one way or another.
@kylerkastner28083 жыл бұрын
“Safety third guys” now that’s a quote that I will live by
@Karl_Kampfwagen3 жыл бұрын
Safety Third, because that comes after Fun (1) and Profits (2). If it makes enough money, ignore safety. If it's fun enough, ignore costs. Never let safety hold you back
@scottwilliams8463 жыл бұрын
13:50
@shannonm38413 жыл бұрын
Safety third , then teamwork
@pedrobarberato76083 жыл бұрын
@@Karl_Kampfwagen Be happy or die trying hahahaha
@RazgrizRed93 жыл бұрын
Check out "Well There's Your Problem" Podcast.
@Dracsmolar Жыл бұрын
Careful when mixing those combinations. Surely you have heard of the German pilot who was fatally burned with that stuff due to a leak while his craft was being fueled. Really like your content and style of delivery.
@chasg5648 Жыл бұрын
What I heard was that the pilot wasn't burned so much as dissolved. Neither sounds desirable.
@lefishe77023 ай бұрын
Different rocket plane
@jfried-l6t3 жыл бұрын
Chemistry is so cool that we're still blown away by stuff from the 40's. Integza, why not use a tesla valve to feed the fuel evenly to the rocket chamber and prevent the kickback? I think you could still use the syringes without them exploding on your moustache.
@xathridtech7273 жыл бұрын
Ahh bringing back Tesla solid state valves I like it
@williamt47493 жыл бұрын
This comment needs more likes!
@slendeer_games87313 жыл бұрын
Genius idea
@garrettw88423 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing!
@Andreas-gh6is3 жыл бұрын
For one thing, tesla valves suck at stopping kickback, for another they have a relatively high resistance even in the forward direction... The only way to ensure there is no kickback is to make the pumping pressure higher than the nozzle pressure. That may mean closing off the pump until the reaction has died down a little (like a pulse jet). Or the inlets must be a lot smaller in diameter than the nozzle.
@peterthierrry9023 жыл бұрын
Have followed rocketry since the 1950s. Have two suggestions for cold rocket: 1) Although your injector worked, the reaction was not full. You can see the wave moving back and forth inside the engine, indicating poor/incomplete transition. 2) What you need is a combustion chamber of the right size and shape, fed by an injection plate designed to spray the proper percentages of t-stof and z-stof. You were using them 50/50, but the literature shows that a little bit of t-stof goes a long way. It's more like 10 to 1. 3) Eventually you're going to need a way to pump the fuel. The same stuff was used to power the turbine pumps in the V2 rocket. Print yourself a turbine and use the same fuel for both. 4) Have you ever heard of a rocket nozzle? You're going to need one. It's a nozzle that turns a spray into a roar. Have you ever noticed brass bands? They have bells too. Just for different reasons. But it's all the same. Just a matter of frequency. I love your stuff! Did you say you live in Texas? I also settled west of the Pecos, where there is no God. It's very odd, but I'm 69 years old, and you remind me of my father. He was always looking at me as if to say, "You could not be the product of my loins." I was, and now have all of his odd twitches and proclivities myself. Thanks. Peace,
@1ue999 Жыл бұрын
as a german, its called "stoff" not "stof"
@danielb.9897 Жыл бұрын
🙄@@1ue999
@jdray Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure he's Portuguese.
@ladamyre1 Жыл бұрын
He said "You could not be the product of my loins."? I know this man! Your father was Buford T. Justice.
@stevenmitchell6347 Жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, the "rocket packs" developed last century were H²O² powered also but they used a platinum "sponge"/mesh as the catalyst. The nozzles got extremely hot in the process.
@juliandoye7143 Жыл бұрын
Great video, just a note: at the beginning you are mixing up in the videos two different aircrafts: the HE-176 and the ME-163. Just saw the latter one in "Deutsches Museum" in Munich/Germany. The ME-163 came after the HE-167 and was actually in use even though with little effect.
@adamnagy45443 жыл бұрын
Material with highest heat resistant you could buy is graphite.... I dont find anything for 3D printing, but maybe you could use graphite rod for critical parts, shaping with lathe and combinate with 3d printed metal parts.
@CUBETechie3 жыл бұрын
@@agusNievas he would need diamond cutting tools or ceramic one
@adamnagy45443 жыл бұрын
@H2O not exactly.... Around 4000 Celsius maybe
@adamnagy45443 жыл бұрын
@@CUBETechie why? Graphite easy to cut and shaping.
@toby5303 жыл бұрын
@H2O i dont think that Graphite burns, because it doesn't. You can use it in an arc welder as a rod.
@beaclaster3 жыл бұрын
so like F1 brakes carbon also oxidize
@imranakbar47003 жыл бұрын
Imagine being integza's neighbor across the street and constantly having a portuguese man launching rockets and tomatoes in your direction, and destroying your tomato garden. Video Idea: build small 3d-printable rockets with a compartment for the permanganate and the peroxide and make it so when you shake it, it mixes them, causing them to launch and fly away.
@among-us-999993 жыл бұрын
tfw your neighbour sprays the entire neighbourhood with a mixture of manganese dioxide and permanganate, and every single plant dies
@jamesg7443 жыл бұрын
I wish smart people lived across the street lol
@aycfes3 жыл бұрын
I have a stupid idea with some potential, that largely defeats the purpose of this engine Unless I'm stupid, the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide makes a good amount of oxygen gas Why not add some fuel to the catalyst, to react with the oxygen, generating more heat and thrust?
@rh99093 жыл бұрын
If you use ethanol as fuel Tada now u got a V2
@andy_liga3 жыл бұрын
@@rh9909 add tablespoon of gyroscopic inertial GNC, a pinch of high explosive and a empty kitchen paper roll... A bit of super glue and now you are ready to send your homemade V2 over the British channel!!! 🤣
@wilfriedklaebe3 жыл бұрын
That would get very hot though, and burn 3D printed rocket parts...
@777swampie3 жыл бұрын
@@rh9909 No the V2 used kerosene and LOX. The peroxide expansion just ran the turbo pump.
@danratsnapnames3 жыл бұрын
actually, the first jet pack was made using this same concept. why not make a jetpack with these rockets.. if i remember correctly, the design had used a pipe from the expansion chamber to feed into the supply containers, and a variable restriction valve in that feed tube to control it. as more pressure is built up into the reaction chamber, it back feeds to the supply chambers forcing more into the reaction chamber.
@clarencehoover6748 Жыл бұрын
Landlord Note: Add to tenant contract “No building or testing rocket engines or chemistry experiments on the premises.”
@visterking3 жыл бұрын
Incorporate Tesla's one way valve on both inputs to prevent blow back on the injectors. This should also help to get all the pressure to exit out the nozzle end of the rocket.
@thelonewolf2673 жыл бұрын
Oh I can see that possibly working
@trollboy6653 жыл бұрын
holy crap I love this
@SpectrumDIY3 жыл бұрын
That was super fun to watch, I'm so proud of your progress on building a rocket engine! That was awesome :3
@danielhooke61153 жыл бұрын
4:22 "... I need to find another solution..." Classic chemistry humor there. 12:12 Given that your thumbs are holding the syringes in place, that is a measure of how much pressure the rocket is (currently) generating; viz, the rate of reaction will need to be increased by several orders of magnitude, probably to almost "explosive" levels.
@ralphanderson2099 Жыл бұрын
Integza great video. When I was a kid I made a compressed air and water rocket for a science project. I bet you could make a powerful compressed-air water rocket. Thanks and keep em coming great work. Peace.
@achimhaun27263 жыл бұрын
Once you have a powerful and reliable engine, send a Tomato "to the edge of space", then detonate the rocket before it arrives. Show tomato who's boss
@-robo-3 жыл бұрын
Please also publish the GPS so the rest of us can try to avoid the resulting tomato schmoo raining back down to the earth. Oh, also.. it's probably a good idea to remove the seeds first, otherwise you will be responsible for tomato supremacy via mass propagation.
@senfdame5283 жыл бұрын
@@-robo- "tomato supremacy via mass propagation" put that on a t-shirt
@-robo-3 жыл бұрын
@@senfdame528 Just remember, it's all Integza's fault!
@ulrichkalber90393 жыл бұрын
you need a checkvalve that stops backflow. also : do you know the double syringes that two-component glue comes in? a similar thing might help with putting out the two components in a good relation. then: the steam should contain a lot of oxygen. is it enough to be used in an "afterburner" ?
@Andreas-gh6is3 жыл бұрын
A checkvalve would stop the reagents flowing in, also. And it would always trigger while the reaction chamber is under higher pressure than the syringe. if not, you don't need a valve anyway...
@dmdjt3 жыл бұрын
@@Andreas-gh6is I think stopping inflow at times is better than backflow. A check valve might not be such a bad idea
@whatelseison89703 жыл бұрын
Peroxide can be used as an oxidizer in its own right. In other words, yes. If you injected fuel into the exhaust stream it would burn strongly and produce thrust if it were followed by a suitable nozzle.
@timehunter94673 жыл бұрын
I think a cool video would be using the Tesla “valve” in a water pump, it would be interesting to see how fast water could flow and if any pressure was able to be made.
@kennethschultz64653 жыл бұрын
My THOUGHT exactli
@TyinAlaska3 жыл бұрын
Not a bad idea to control back pressure.
@unisiple3 жыл бұрын
Pitch it to an engineer thats what i do.
@forcesightknight3 жыл бұрын
It's already being done. To genius to not be utilized for awhile now.
@BOT_Nips3 жыл бұрын
Came to suggest using a one-way valve for back pressure regulation at fuel storages... These might be worth looking into simultanously!
@GuyFawkes911 Жыл бұрын
You can build two pressure vessels filling them with Hydrogen peroxide and potassium permanganate add compressed air. now you just have to open two valves to feed your rocket engine. An even better way is to coat ceramic beads or a metal mesh with the permanganate. This way you have less water (easier mixing and just one valve) and thus less weight.
@jeichner13 жыл бұрын
This is the best Episode so far. I can‘t wait to see more!
@filippocarletti33523 жыл бұрын
Make a 3D printed pelton turbine and drive it using height and water with a 3D printed nozzle!
@arnabmahapatra80213 жыл бұрын
Integza steals my heart everytime with his 3D printing prowess Hail Integza!
@parshvapatel84843 жыл бұрын
Hi integza read my comment
@remuladde71413 жыл бұрын
Hail Integza!
@Generic_Tech_Support10 ай бұрын
OMG i have found the best channel on KZbin! This is amazing! This guys incredible! Keep it up bud! Amazing work!
@Enderbro33003 жыл бұрын
I feel like you could i use a whole lot less permangante since it's a catalyst. It might make the output stream more consistent. Or even better find some way to hold it stationary instead of in a fluid? Like a mesh or honeycomb that the peroxide gets shot through. I have no idea how that would work but you're the engineer.
@zechsblack58913 жыл бұрын
Platinum mesh would be ideal iirc. Probably some cheaper mesh that could be used tho.
@okok-mb2vp3 жыл бұрын
@@zechsblack5891 hmmm, that break instantly when the platnium oxidices (burns)
@xathridtech7273 жыл бұрын
So let's imagine he dipped a half cured resin print in it. he would have to change the nozzle and make it use the whole area and there are reasons he's avoiding the middle. But then those are replaceable fuel cells and a chance it doesn't stay on
@hudsonsimpson41223 жыл бұрын
I think your thinking of a hybrid rocket fuel grain
@alexanderklee63573 жыл бұрын
@@zechsblack5891 wouldn't a car catalyst be perfect for exactly this?
@vaelophisnyx98733 жыл бұрын
I will note, that a few successful ME163 flights occurred, with confirmed kills on allied bombers; who didn't understand what the hell was attacking them, out of nowhere, with no sound. that said, the design has a higher body-count of pilots, than enemy airmen. Turns out, flesh and 90% Hydrogen Peroxide do not mix well.
@chadnuts3 жыл бұрын
I can imagine that death being very horrific
@indextron23883 жыл бұрын
plus the design of it made it incredibly hard to control in flight
@johndanielsaffold4283 жыл бұрын
And the operational range was rather poor.
@polyjohn34253 жыл бұрын
High Test Peroxide doesn't mix well with ANYTHING. It even has a tendency to spontaneously explode. Some countries have used it as a torpedo propellant, but they tend to eventually have catastrophic accidents. It's also used in some systems in modern rocketry, usually reaction control thrusters.
@ersetzbar.3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, not sure if you would even want to survive that if you got showered within a 90% hydrogenperoxide cloud. must be a great feeling when it covers the inside of your lungs
@prathamkirank3 жыл бұрын
VI: Once finished building an engine with decent thrust, attach it to a shopping cart. Ride it shouting slogans against tomatoes.
@susanholiday7347 Жыл бұрын
Me and a friend was talking about something, mostly saying that it had way too much head, and hardly any body. So we dumped our beers and ordered new ones.
@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh3 жыл бұрын
Make an ALICE rocket, but using hydrogen peroxide instead of water. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE_%28propellant%29 [update]The output of H2O2 decomposition is H2O and liberated O2 Al H2O combustion results in Al2O3 and liberated H2. I would presume H2O2 Al combustion would not have much leftover H2 or O2 if the stoichiometry was matched as those have an affinity for each other.
@demolition36123 жыл бұрын
I don’t think H2O2 would benefit the reaction, Just thinking about the reactions in my head, Im 90% sure you would get less out of H2O2 and aluminum frozen than H2O and aluminum frozen
@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh3 жыл бұрын
@@demolition3612 The output of H2O2 decomposition is H2O and liberated O2 Al H2O combustion results in Al2O3 and liberated H2. I would presume H2O2 Al combustion would not have much leftover H2 or O2 if the stoichiometry was matched as those have an affinity for each other.
@Bavarianscience3 жыл бұрын
@@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh You can't really freeze H2O2 above like -60°C so preparing and storing that would be kind of a pain already. Also the H2O2 will probably start decomposing due to the high surface area of Al nanopowder present, which would lead into thermal runaway pretty quickly and make it dangerous to work with. Besides that, even at appropriate storage temps like -80°C the peroxide will still slowly decompose, turning the propellant into a porous mass and most certainly lowering it's efficiency.
@demolition36123 жыл бұрын
@@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh I know, however he is using 50% H2O2 50% H2O, and on average the reaction would be like this ; H2O + H2O2 + (2)Al -> (2)H2 + 1 Al2O3 The reaction with 100% H2O goes as fallows, (3)H2O + (2)Al -> (3)H2 + 1 Al2O3 the one with 100% water gets you more hydrogen per aluminum oxide generated, this is negated if you use 100% H2O2, (3)H2O2 + 4Al -> (6)H2 + (2)Al2O3 Also in an Alice rocket it needs to be frozen as a mixture, and the aluminum powder must not be oxidized. H2O2 is just slightly harder to freeze apposed to water.
@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh3 жыл бұрын
@@Bavarianscience H2O2 freezes very slightly after water. I have used it to try to fractionally distill 35% peroxide.
@tvishmaychoudhary693 жыл бұрын
I think that some thrust is escaping at the syringes making them harder to pump which is bad A one way valve should work This is where your old TESLA value would work
@dimitarnikolov35273 жыл бұрын
That's not how thrust works. It doesn't matter if the pressure pushes against a valve or the syringes, the thrust would be the same. A valve would not have any effect, especially a Tesla one.
@Lozosos3 жыл бұрын
"no tomatoes were harmed in the making of this video" -everyone disliked that I would like to see the thrust of your rocket engines tested in their ability to squish a tomato, or at least how damaged they would be if you put them in the direction of the exhaust.
@gonzalocanada65683 жыл бұрын
Proyect idea: A few years ago I remember seeing a lot of potato launchers done with compressed air, you should definitely try a tomato launcher powered by this engine
@PatrickKniesler3 жыл бұрын
A "cold" potato/tomato cannon using H2O2 sounds great. Would require a long barrel or a decomp chamber with pressure release valve into the breech, I think.
@sebas41393 жыл бұрын
integza: ¿why would i do this? integza´s enemies: ¡Our battle will be legendary!
@aleisterlavey97163 жыл бұрын
Better a hho potato canon
@bluewater72112 жыл бұрын
I did a thing is a really funny channel to and also a very well put together show like this. I get a lot of enjoyment out of that channel and this one like others that are similar. Again I'm surprised I'm just learning about your channel just recently. Thank you for the time you all pt into this for us. I personally very much appreciate the time I get to smile and watch videos.
@CXar-253 жыл бұрын
You should make the "combustion chamber" more compact In this way the steam would be released with a lot more of pressure (I don't know if this would work)
@peterelliott33473 жыл бұрын
As schoolboy of the 1930's your experiments with potassium permanganate awakened some dormant memories. In those days of pre ball pens we had desks with inkwells. The potassium permanganate was known as Condy's crystals which you could buy dry at the local pharmacist. The effervescent properties were known well and used to play a trick on other classmates by adding a quite small amount to the liquid in the inkwell causing a quite violent reaction. I guess some of those young german kids remembered that too.
@honkhonk8009 Жыл бұрын
You were a schoolboy in the 1930s???? Holy fuck You gotta explain more bro. Also i have an inkwell pen from my aunt as a gift. Their still used in countries like Srilanka where its more of a tradition i think.
@lorm_3 жыл бұрын
14:24 the genuine joy in his voice is just so wholesome
@brandonwilliams27703 жыл бұрын
well make your dreams and ideas a reality has that effect on you
@dbmail5452 жыл бұрын
I'm really amazed that such an energetic reaction produces so little heat.
@puellanivis3 жыл бұрын
“I would definitely recommend the Ex&F discord.” Ah shit, I know where this is going!
@brunobohrer37563 жыл бұрын
yellow Rocket Engine
@ZeLunatic3 жыл бұрын
tar Rocket Engine
@AnthonyGerdes3 жыл бұрын
the what? can a man get a link to this "ex&f" discord?
@SonyCommander3 жыл бұрын
@@AnthonyGerdes here’s the channel, not sure about the discord. Funny stuff kzbin.info
@puellanivis3 жыл бұрын
@@SonyCommander The best thing I think he did, was make azidoazide azide, and demonstrated that… like… yeah, it’s not such a great explosive, because it’s not so stable… but there are way more reactive chemicals out there.
@normal1883 жыл бұрын
Video Ideas: 1. You could make a steam powered generator and for example put it into a electric rc car. 2. Put the steam engine into a plane and see if it powerful enough to move it. 3. Make a working speaker. 4. Try to recreate your earlier projects and see if you can improve on them.
@simonstastny90973 жыл бұрын
Project Idea: Maybe try to make a "professional" water rocket before building a chemical one, something that would fly hundreds of meters, you could even test it with an aerospike nozzle (or hydrospike?)!. I think it would help you develop the final version of a chemical rocket.
@DrShroom.3 жыл бұрын
čao
@hypercomms20014 ай бұрын
A rather modest chap... " I am not a rocket expert of any kind"... And then spend the next 10 minutes proving that he does bloody will know a hell of a lot about rockets... So from where I stand I would describe him as a "drip under pressure"! Good on you!
@surrealengineering78843 жыл бұрын
i'd like to see much more with this engine type, planes, rockets, steam engines whatever you feel like building the most, i'll certainly love to watch it!
@ngaborov44493 жыл бұрын
Main idea for next video: try again with silver as a catalyst, but this time try to make a different shape (in X-15 plane, they used silver in a shape of a sieve (hope it was translated correctly), through which the peroxide was passed (hope that translated correctly as well)); Another idea: try and make the most efficient possible bell/aerospike nozzle for your rocket (a little bit of fluid mechanics). Nice video btw, I always love modern interpretations of old ideas!
@The.Heart.Unceasing3 жыл бұрын
idea : feeding the exhaust of this engine into a hybrid rocket core, using the oxygen from the reaction as the oxidizer, a sort of afterburner if you want (I have no idea if that would work ^^)
@tvishmaychoudhary693 жыл бұрын
No it wound not Do you want to know why?
@letsflipp3 жыл бұрын
i think a problem would be the water vapour and it cooling down the oxygen reaction. or it could work and superheat the steam for even better exhaust
@Hellsong893 жыл бұрын
@@letsflipp If you can get past 1000C in the core temp, that water starts to break down to hydrogen and oxygen feeding the reaction even more, but it needs to be pretty high temp. Powerplants use this by feeding wet burnable fuel into furnace so it floats in the air flow and due temps on there mentioned atomic breakdown happens and feeds the fire further, hence why littlebit wet fuel is better, but only if you can get into high temps where this happens, otherwise energy is lost in the heating water further.. though that does expand so there could be net benefit on this.. is it worth the weight and complexity added? Dunno but worth to test i think.
@The.Heart.Unceasing3 жыл бұрын
@@tvishmaychoudhary69 why ?
@STRIKEcorperation3 жыл бұрын
@@Hellsong89 thermolysis of water is only significant beyond 2000C, and it is endothermic so it wont add any energy to the reaction
@XTeKK693 жыл бұрын
I liked your video, found it informative. great suspenders btw.
@Fancysaurus3 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see your take on some of the more interesting types of heat pumps. A sound based one is actually pretty cool and relatively easy to make once you get the concept down.
@yayayayya47313 жыл бұрын
There are some hydrogen peroxide rocket cars. They are totally insane. They also use a fancy ceramic catalysts
@sampalahiri26953 жыл бұрын
Just a thing, one of the byproduct of this reaction is 3O2 gas. You can use it to burn a hybrid fuel so you get double the colume of gas and technically a lotta thrust if you make it H202 rich
@raulreiman30632 жыл бұрын
3:00 take out water :) "right" heat and distillation (like methanol & ethanol have different boiling/vaporize points (1 bar pressure) )
@joseandresesquivel86553 жыл бұрын
I think it would be suuuper cool to se a part 2 of this video. A video where you upgrade the nozzle and syringes and where you measure the force generated by the rocket!! Thank you, Intzega!!
@rocketCC3 жыл бұрын
It may help to create a “solid propellant” style lining with the KMnO4 and have the H2O2 flow through it but I would imagen the stream velocity through the lining would have to be somewhat high in order to keep the thrust in one direction ish
@crocosnz33223 жыл бұрын
This would not work as well: It's an issue of surface area. As a liquid spray the surface area is massively higher then it could be as a lining. That being said, I'm pretty sure Integza is using a massive excess of Permanganate - could use a LOT less.
@martindinner36213 жыл бұрын
@@crocosnz3322 re: permanganate, true! Also check valves in the injection lines will be key!
@cryntolov98563 жыл бұрын
Hey Integza I was wondering if you could show a thermal image of the rocket in action so we can see how much heat is generated as it'd be incredibly interesting to see.
@jakkakasunset54852 жыл бұрын
See just how "cold" it really is
@vj.joseph Жыл бұрын
You need to revisit this project. Add an aerospike at the end and a rotating detonation chamber inside, use 100% concentrated solution, and a high speed motor for injection and see what happens.
@arjunagaming87853 жыл бұрын
6:28 Integza : did you catch it kathrina? Kathrina with italians accent : yoaaa Lol
@davidninan883 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see the ultimate childhood train set where you get this set up functioning on a small scale and see how well you can make a miniature steam engine train.
@Leadvest3 жыл бұрын
They used to sell those as a set, my dad has one.
@Plankyo52233 жыл бұрын
Yea like the idea of 3d printing a steam engine an I also recommend making a gas engine with 3 printed metal like the last video.
@chuckles18083 жыл бұрын
I tried that, but the tolerances of printed parts don't meet the standards of gasoline combustion. The term that describes it in action is "catastrophic failure".
@Perfect_German Жыл бұрын
2:08: Yes you are right. You are the most beautiful man in the world. Your moustache is definately proof of it. I adore it!
@jaredsmythe46493 жыл бұрын
Curious, when designing the nozzle do you just pick a geometry that looks good or do you actually use the equations to design a proper nozzle? Because I think if you continue with this project you should definitely make a proper one!
@jaredsmythe46493 жыл бұрын
@@smashinbedrock4903 oh trust me I know. Got an entire degree on it. The mass flow for the hand pump would be tricky but if he automated like he wanted too then its all very doable. And some approximations are always okay lol
@Try2-Imagine3 жыл бұрын
If you have watched him you know he doesn't do engineering.
@saooran73643 жыл бұрын
You did all this rant just to bring up your fancy degree on equations to proper nozzle. Clearly because you thing you are better than us. I really hope you have the distinguishing moustache required to flex like that around here boy.
@jaredsmythe46493 жыл бұрын
@@saooran7364 My mustache can't compete with Integzas that's for sure! Then again no ones can. Just love to help him put a nozzle together if he wants since it can be hard!
@saooran73643 жыл бұрын
@@jaredsmythe4649 You sounded a little too snub-nozzled, but you are a fine lad after all.
@_Mav3 жыл бұрын
Would love to see a piston or rotary engine made with these substances
@bikerfirefarter72803 жыл бұрын
check out 'peroxide turbines'.
@voornaam31913 жыл бұрын
I bet you own a Flintstone car. You love oldfashion lack of engineering. Piston engines use 70% of the fuel to heat the air. Exhaust is bloody hot and all that energy is wasted. And nobody has done anything the last 50 years, to change that. No, homo sapiens is not half as intelligent as he thinks he is. Piston engines? It is junk! Reliable maybe, still junk!
@spvillano2 жыл бұрын
@@voornaam3191 reliable by nature is not junk. Inefficient, yes, but junk is by nature inefficient. As for heat output, don't even get me started on turbine heat output! Efficient, sure, but any degree of lateral runout on a bearing will catastrophically destroy the turbine.
@BrapBrapDorito2 жыл бұрын
@@voornaam3191 “guys look at me I’m so futuristic please give me the attention I never received from my parents”
@randomanimatorandgamer93922 жыл бұрын
@@voornaam3191 bro chill out. It's just an idea, mr "I live in the future and love being a jerk". Just cuz it's old or doesn't have a lot of engineering doesn't mean its junk. Go get attention from somewhere else
@DylanThomas6623 жыл бұрын
You could make an rc plane out of this engine design. First the engine needs to be more optimised, you could use 2 motors/pumps to accurately spray in the fuel mixture and optimise the percentage of each to give the most efficiency. The plane itself could be made out of foam or balsa wood frame and paper/cardboard with the servos and motors etc inside to make it controllable ish. Even just a 2 way plane would be controllable enough to test if it will work (maybe try and get in contact with Peter Sripol for help with that)
@jonathandill35573 жыл бұрын
Tom Stanton would also be good and easier to actually meet up with Integza since he's also in Europe.
@whatelseison89703 жыл бұрын
A better idea than pumps would just to have 2 tanks pressurized with compressed air or maybe a CO2 cartridge. That's called a pressure fed engine (for obvious reasons). It's a very common approach when weight and auxiliary power for pumps is an issue like space probes. Look up Scott Manley's channel. He's probably the best rocket/science channel on youtube.
@jonathandill35573 жыл бұрын
@@whatelseison8970 Flite Test blog has an article about Tom Stanton's compressed air engines including some planes that he built with them.
@whatelseison89703 жыл бұрын
@@jonathandill3557 I know, I've been subbed to Tom for ages and I've used some of the plans from FT. I've been doing RC air stuff for a while now.
@DylanThomas6623 жыл бұрын
@@jonathandill3557 true, he slipped my mind tbh
@manchld2 жыл бұрын
Safety third is a great burner phrase but still, safety first because you are a great person who makes us happy.
@Ballacha3 жыл бұрын
design suggestion: why not trying solid KMnO4 as catalyst? like keep the solid powder in between 2 pieces of coffee filters then pass H2O2 through it.
@joshuamashburn71823 жыл бұрын
This but add a Tesla value for the peroxide intake to reduce changes of back pressure. Could possibly just connect the Tesla valve to a cut off valve and a tank so it could be can a pressured feed system, then would just need a second cut off valve at the top of the tank for air.
@silversanctum27133 жыл бұрын
I was gonna suggest this. I would mold the solid KMnO4 into a cylinder and then have two fine mesh screens, not coffee filter, to allow gas to escape. One would be to hold the solid monopropellant and the other at the nozzle. Also tesla valve on the input valve is a great idea. Maybe the peroxide could be sprayed in a cone?
@WalterHWhite-vu1ps3 жыл бұрын
I like your funny words magic man
@FactoryofRedstone3 жыл бұрын
I think the coffee filter would rip apart quite fast. I thought about that also at first to use a solid catalyst. Maybe coat the walls of the combustion chamber with it. But the liquid one has a few advantages. 1. Very high surface area. Especially with the vortex mixer, the effective surface area is very high and that means more reaction per time. 2. Additional impulse. The water and the catalyst are ejected. That means for the same nozzle velocity there is more mass pushed out of the rocket so there is a higher change in impuls thus a higher thrust. 3. Better cooling. There is a lot of energy getting released during the reaction. The additional water of the catalyst solution can also heat up taking heat away. Especially when it also boils it will also generate thrust. The last two mostly apply to this rocket only because of the 3D printed parts the rocket has a low temperature and pressure resistance, compared to a metal rocket. Otherwise, this would really be a concern.
@voornaam31913 жыл бұрын
@@FactoryofRedstone What is the difference between thrust and trust? I don't thrust these designs that start with "Maybe....".
@johnmcn19753 жыл бұрын
You definitely need to team back up with Tom Stanton again and build a 3D printed plane around that rocket engine!
@angrymario82593 жыл бұрын
Or ProjectAir he is currently building an Rocket Car
@bryander3 жыл бұрын
The future was right there in front of us all along-the carbon neutral rocket engine! We used potassium permanganate in high school chem, so it seems it’d be a pretty accessible substance to get hold of and tinker with (maybe we’ll see some DIY flying cars before we get to viable escape-velocity-achieving rockets).
@philblanc73642 жыл бұрын
Nice exhibit A. congrats. keep up the good work.
@coleroske99683 жыл бұрын
Idea for a future video: you could use the expanding gas reaction to make a turbo jet. The turbine could be 3D printed because the reaction is cold. Then you have a spinning shaft down the middle of your rocket engine which you could use to run two separate compressors stacked on top of each other that pump the two chemicals in. All you’d have to do is like pull start the rocket engine and the compressors would pump the two liquids into the combustion chamber.
@miguelguerreiro52803 жыл бұрын
That sounds a lot like a V2 rocket.
@Sorrentino_Gianni3 жыл бұрын
Video idea: 3d printed gimbal for DSLR cameras Since you seem to love rotating forces, let's exploit their momentum. Build a gimbal with 2 rotating disks shifted by 90 degrees (X and Z axis active gyroscopic stabilization) and use their momentum to cancel the vibration induced by the camera operator.
@abbe33013 жыл бұрын
That would be really usefull!
@Sorrentino_Gianni3 жыл бұрын
@@abbe3301 I know, let's hope he'll build it sooner or later.
@eamonia3 жыл бұрын
Dude, I am so pumped about this. I can't wait to see a complete standalone iteration. Keep it up man, I think you're really onto something with this one.
@sahildwivedi22192 жыл бұрын
Love ur stuff bro
@archie45213 жыл бұрын
Crazy how an insane amount of peroxide just boils away at the smallest amount of permanganate. I was wondering, maybe you could try putting up an Ion Thruster of your own design to compete with your cold engine whenever you're done with the pump system! I think that'd be pretty nice. Thanks for the video!
@illama53303 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@bikerfirefarter72803 жыл бұрын
That's why it's called 'a catalyst'. duh.
@italolima13323 жыл бұрын
Design suggestion: use a Tesla valve on the intake lines; use a smaller "combustion" chamber. Tomatoes = rocket dummies!
@bigmoney71743 жыл бұрын
Got to love Tesla forget the simple check valve
@teampython31343 жыл бұрын
Could also use an inline check valve after syringes so the pot perm and peroxide have no back flow
@Jamesvandaele3 жыл бұрын
Ooh. I love this
@cammakurat63002 жыл бұрын
I guess we would have to call it a "reaction" chamber
@249xyx3 жыл бұрын
Suggestion for future videos: Try designing a working rocket engine with the knowledge you've collected. Then, or in another video, you build a rocket with the engine, which flies at least 1000 meters high and arrives safely on the ground. Would be very grateful for the 3d printer... I am also trying to develop a working rocket engine, allthough i am using steel for the parts.
@kernoin3 жыл бұрын
Integza: wants higher concentration hydrogen peroxide also Integza: is hand pumping the hydrogen peroxide and it explodes in his face
@nickbosschaert30263 жыл бұрын
You could, at the end of the year, make an epic montage of all the good and bad moments of your rocket engines from de past year
@WingofTech3 жыл бұрын
And boy have there been some good an bad moments. That’d be great. :]
@blackaporo55813 жыл бұрын
Video idea: Make a 3D printed car with each of the interesting engines you built and once for all, settle which one is the best!
@gijsclaassens30603 жыл бұрын
you should try creating a "toy bazooka" that uses "compressed air rockets" to hit targets. should be pretty fun
@lukeevan53933 жыл бұрын
I am building something sort of like that. If you are interested I can share my design. It should be done in a week.
@Ionizem3 жыл бұрын
Needs baffling to prevent unreacted fuel mix from being forced out the nozzle... would gain many X efficiency... but would likely over pressure the device.. Thanks for the very entertaining videos!
@natsukidaichi44383 жыл бұрын
Hi, really don't know what I'am saying but this is a great idea for part 2. Video idea -- i noticed that you only used syringes to drive your propellants and catalyst into the combustion chamber. How about putting it in a pressurised chamber (20psi or higher) to replace the syringes. And maybe a solenoid valve on each end. That would be cool to watch. Also I dont know if its efficient or not to dissolve potassium permanganate in liquid oxygen. Thats something I would like to watch in the future video. Thanks
@mitchluis70913 жыл бұрын
Bro I think that's a good idea.
@neillfrancisartiaga78273 жыл бұрын
@@mitchluis7091 I think so too
@francisprinceartiaga86063 жыл бұрын
I hope you win bro.
@natsukidaichi44383 жыл бұрын
@@francisprinceartiaga8606 my chances are very slim but i really think that this is a good idea
@francisprinceartiaga86063 жыл бұрын
@@natsukidaichi4438 yeah your is idea is good. I hope integza would see your comment
@skeywild28083 жыл бұрын
I’m so happy for him bro, he finally made a rocket that didn’t end up breaking it
@Pscribbled3 жыл бұрын
Looks to me like you’re using the catalyst as a propellant, making it a bipropellant rocket. Have you looked into making a catalyst bed?
@SamFisk3 жыл бұрын
Mix the catalyst into the resin and print something with large surface area, perhaps.
@douro203 жыл бұрын
H2O2 is used to drive the turbopumps on the main stage engines of the Soyuz rocket. The catalyst used there is an active zirconia matrix called F-30-P-G in the form of pellets covered in an aqueous solution of sodium and potassium permanganates.
@octaviacoquus88573 жыл бұрын
Integza: "finally, something good came out of nazi research" The moon landing: "am I a joke to you?"
@clueless40963 жыл бұрын
the entire field of aerospace engineering from 1945 onwards :
@TheBlueScreenYT3 жыл бұрын
I’ve learned everything I know about rockets from ksp. And I just associate everything with black magic
@borkedboards56393 жыл бұрын
or the kraken
@TheBlueScreenYT3 жыл бұрын
@@borkedboards5639 I see no difference between the two
@pushyslayer45613 жыл бұрын
Good Ol Jeb
@deepspacekraken70993 жыл бұрын
@Borked Boards sure me too
@martinlopezdecalle2333 жыл бұрын
You should find what ratio stoichiometric mixture is so you can optimize the reaction. Of course, dont use exactly de stoichiometric mixture because probably is going to explode.
@xathridtech7273 жыл бұрын
Well considering the way he probably would do it is by diluting the catalyst I think it be fine
@JaneDoe-dg1gv3 жыл бұрын
you can also control temperature rise by down blending the peroxide with more water; s'long as you allow for higher pressure rise.
@never2bknown9042 жыл бұрын
Co2 can inject your fuels, your reaction chamber can reduced, and your injectors should be 1 way. Great content btw.
@Goldpug3 жыл бұрын
to avoid the chemical reaction from reaching the storage tanks you should use 1 way valves that could help
@JustinDavidow2 жыл бұрын
The "fuel" delivery system in use here has no metering of any sort. The volumes of propelent and catalyst were likely many orders or magnitude too high for the size of the expansion chamber/ mixing nozzle delivery rate. I look forward to seeing more in this series!
@derpuck97692 жыл бұрын
How about a Tesla valve for the inlet :)
@KitRackhamGetMeFixed Жыл бұрын
Very interesting, I think it's also a relationship of the volume used, tesla valves would surely help limit the backflow pressures but much a smaller syringe would be like a disc brakes master/slave pistons and allow much finer control and a basic adjustment of the design without much expense. Using pneumatic tubing and push fittings designed for reasonable pressure might have been a good idea! But I guess I wouldn't have laughed as much then...
@cruster103 жыл бұрын
now that you have a "working engine" after you figure out the pumping mechanism try and put the rocket on a model aircraft
@bounzig3 жыл бұрын
Video suggestion: A rocket powered RC boat or car would be kinda cool to see, using your new method.
@claymoreroomba29213 жыл бұрын
or plane
@AkashBagFEce Жыл бұрын
Dhanyabad to you also! You teach us a lot!!! Love from India...❤❤❤