The future of film production - BBC Click

[@marc_frank]

0:48 says how good vfx has become but doesn't have a shadow

[@shpluk]

all around the quality is shit

[@marc_frank]

shpluk the vfx scene isn't so nice, yes, but the vid itself is alright

[@shpluk]

yes the video is great

[@DynestiGTI]

Post-production mate

[@damarh]

well duh, there is no shadows in space.

[@AuthenTech]

Let @Corridor Digital play here for a little while, they'd produce some fun results!

[@lupusk9productions]

Seriously! Good idea.

[@g4br9el]

Or RocketJump

[@Napstone]

Always a pleasurable delight watching BBC Click as always :)

[@glenngoodale1709]

I want to say thank you for making this video....AMAZING

[@metheone4]

4:30 All these effects, green box productions and computer animations, if done well, are quite nice to look at and sometimes breathtaking. The only thing that unfortunately gets lost is the art of acting. I grew up in the 70s as the son of a movie show and was able to see many jewels of film art. like spaghetti western movies, great classics like Ben Hur, Ten Commandments, Nosferatu or Django and movies etc .... Miss this movie experience, even if there's a lot of new stuff worth seeing, but back then some really talented actors ! No matter how talented, actors are these days,the cost of the show increases to absurd heights today.and so is the wage.

[@junesept234]

oh my, I am now living in the future. I love the way how new science and technology are being applied to many things. I also love how you present the different technology in this diverse way. It gave me goosebumps and I am amazed. I saw many digital studios on the internet featuring the science and technologies but I didn't expect to this good in following this trends.

[@erikaranburu4339]

Guggenheim Museum shown in the video is located in Bilbao, Basque Country not New York

[@93Wakizashi]

quite the distance! saw the same here and was like uh, that not NY..

[@AntTonyLOLKID]

AWWW MAN I remember this Volumetric video thing from Intel's reveal before the Winter Olympics. Its great that BBC covered this in depth. Thank you so much BBC!

[@codyrap95]

Why didn't I know about this show earlier? It's all I ever wanted

[@polsubira1994]

The Guggenheim museum shown in the piece is at Bilbao, not NY.

[@NavedRasul]

Well done to all the wild life workers. Great job!

[@HalukTarcanht]

3:00 look at that green spill even outside the studio!

[@TinyWorlds]

14:03 He was so proud, makes me so happy to see :D

[@shmookins]

For the green room dome: what if actors wore scanners/transmitters in multiple places on their body so they can scan 'everything'? It would be cheaper and easier, but I don't know about the quality.

[@vjoneofficial]

@3:25 They are using sigma art lenses on the cameras. That looks like the 18-35. The camera looks custom. Similar to a sony specialty camera. It does not have internal recording ability...which means some server type IO is utilised to resolve all the different angles. Neat.

[@C1Ansy]

6:24 This scene look damn good for sure as long as it stays looking realistic

[@dresuma2420]

Fav. segment in bbc

[@Charlie-tl4dv]

10'02 " That is not the Guggenheim museum in NY, as the voice over says. Tha's the one in Bilbao (Spain).

[@bishnu_YT]

7:50 whaaaaaaaaaat?!

[@PresidentialWinner]

Like...what the hell

[@CRBvlog]

Casually talking about some dumb shit ... they want to push bouderies, yeah, get lost shithead.

[@cboisj]

I know right! That is the worst idea ever. Don't they know what really happens to those poor girls? Regardless of whether its satirical story or not, its in very poor taste.

[@cboisj]

Nice language Demonism. Also, it doesn't matter if its real or not, you are missing the point.

[@CRBvlog]

Nice try you deomonic soul, changing the subject, thats what satan is about, smoke and mirrors, he's a looser. My point was that she says with a smile on her face that a game is made about dating ISIS, true or not, the attitude is problematic . So just go to hell where your mindset and name is coming from. Tring to turn tables with a shit move, not gonna happen. Only hope for you is Jesus, but we all know you're just gonna make fun of that too, so yeah, your future is bright ... brightened by the fire of hell.

[@twosidedpolygon7941]

"The graphics computer" Oh my

[@sumatrasumatra9336]

10:04 that's Bilbao, (Spain), not New York

[@ben-kitchen]

I had to check that this was made in 2018 when I saw those 2006 video game graphics at 0:33...

[@ScrotumPole]

good program shame about the low volume

[@nicobaicu]

so glad to know you are using Blackmagic cameras :D

[@theoppp11]

10:01 It's not New York, it's the Guggenheim of Bilbao

[@MagicPlants]

excellent show

[@sebhch244]

Wow, the intro it's awesome, I love it, is this vas made on after effects?

[@jacksvlogs9924]

Wait! Can I just say, if a studio figures out how to film an entire movie on this stage, people could wear VR head sets and walk around the scene watching it as if they were someone in the movie! That would revolutionize the movie industry!

[@simtekgroup3080]

No, you would just bang your head around the theatre/house like an idiot.

[@LeoRomanusFilms]

Miek model from Thor: Raganrok @ 2:13

[@RojsaCom]

Turtles are so cute :)

[@abhinavprakash007]

I fail to understand why such nicely made videos dont get enough views?!

[@veemacks7255]

It's also broadcast on TV and is available from the BBC iPlayer, so it's only a smallish proportion of their viewers that watch it here.

[@nsd_nebulousdia1366]

wow... just wow.. amazing

[@jacksvlogs9924]

This is insane!!

[@swarajkanr]

12:40 is @kat_b_hawkins wearing a prosthetic leg?

[@perseohernandez755]

UFF !... I suscribe right now !

[@vicx05]

Does this mean we can watch movies from any perspective (in VR) in the future, or is this only to aid producers in choosing the right angles for the final cut?

[@NaakaQ]

this juncture is option B, but in the future with enough hard drive space maybe? point clouds from my understanding are very data heavy and that means something like this would be in the terabytes+ range. Again at this point in time it is better for directors to create a virtual camera and "film" from there, that would make it only a video format size rather than point cloud size.

[@NaakaQ]

also as another thought process where would you get the warehouse size room to watch this movie from for true freedom of perspective? otherwise you deal with what the director would give you and at this point stationary sitting while rotating your head around.

[@simtekgroup3080]

If the answer is option B, then I would suggest a more cost effective scenario to producers. Hire a director that can actually do his/her job.

[@air23drones32]

I THINK I CAME UP THIS IDEA BEFORE THEM AND THE NAME TOO I HAVE A NOTE BOOK AS PROOF AS PART OF MY MINOR UNI FINAL PROJECTS IN 1998. AND I HAVE MORE ADVANCE THINKING WHICH THEY HAVE NOT CREATED YET ....ITS IN MY NOTE BOOKS WHICH I STILL KEEP.

[@JorgeGamaliel]

Very good!!

[@Freeedy]

Brilliant

[@TinyWorlds]

Is the turtle movement dataset/visualisation available somewhere? Looks real interesting. Oh and their webcam!

[@carkod]

what about GDPR

[@johnanni9180]

WOW! NO SHADOWS!!!

[@SupunWiratunga]

And there's URANUS!

[@YaYaMan]

The next three Matrix movies are going to be amazing if they use this tech.

[@solidiersnake]

4:27 Batman's Detective Vision became reality.

[@leonard8766]

why green?

[@MrStu]

Those example clips look so fake! More awful cartoony SFX coming soon.

[@craggolly]

Because they weren't cleaned up properly. the western shots were edited pretty shite, but with a good motion artist and vfx team you can get some really convincing camera moves out of it. Also, the age of cartoony vfx is technically over. all big budget productions have tons of stuff in them nowadays where noone even noticed it's cgi. Only the cheaply done fx get noticed

[@jadereaper1088]

I didn't know that Uranus and Neptune were low definition...

[@stefanmodigh7897]

@2:10 They are getting ready with a new moon landing :P

[@Stonkzy]

Marvel is gonna have some fun with this

[@SD-tj5dh]

1996 called. They want their special effects back.

[@РоманЛендофф]

please add subtitles in english

[@lightningbolt4451]

oh dear

[@rdooski]

The movie Matrix says "You're welcome"

[@movax20h]

Cool tech, but it shows problems in very fine objects. If you look at movement of sand in the scene, it is very very unnatural. Cameras cannot correlate sand particles thrown into air from multiple cameras and are confused.

[@craggolly]

Because the shots aren't cleaned up.

[@movax20h]

Walter Read my message again.

[@zimouspero]

movax20h give time. things will become better and better.

[@movax20h]

zimous david I think you should also read my message again too. It is physically impossible.

[@zimouspero]

movax20h i got you brother. but nothin is impossible, just extreme dificult today. imagine yourself doing a time travel and showing your phone mobile to any person you meet in the past. like 2000 years ago. they will never undestand. so give time to time. im sorry for my english

[@candykanefpv]

That fancy studio seems like a good way to refine the technology, but it still looks shit. It also doesn't add to the shot.

[@spartanboosts]

It only adds another option to "directing". Yeah, you could say there is a line to draw between directing and editing...but in reality the director gets the most control if he masters this over a filming crew and camera operators. But traditional movie making and this are two different ball games. Let's explore another method of filming to allow for even more possibilities. In essence another tool in the directors kit.

[@candykanefpv]

it's not that, it's just that the cinematics of what they're doing doesn't make the scene any better. neither of you get that point. You can have much more drama and tension in a scene by ommitting everything else that's going on.

[@craggolly]

The cleaned up version of the shot that was only shown briefly was actually fairly well done and this system allows for camera position to be determined later and makes fancy 3d flyarounds of actors, maybe frozen in time like the credits of deadpool a lot easier to produce

[@robinkhan4132]

Glass phone released day please you answer???

[@soumyeet]

6:00 6:15

[@Cole_McCormick]

"due to the laws of 1835" TIME FOR AN UPDATE

[@paytmguru5662]

Future of porn is bright

[@USAIsrUKEUVngrdBLRckOccupiedUA]

ХD

[@11enterprises78]

this will compromise the personal touch of great cinematographers out there

[@NiteOwlVibes]

This might completely get rid of cinematographer, but will create another type of editor.

[@lajoswinkler]

Those who care will not do it. CGI hasn't evolved a lot. Still looks awful.

[@simtekgroup3080]

It's a cool gimmick for childish entertainment-oriented projects, but real cinema is a totally different thing. Not only in cinematography, but especially in directing.

[@newsnk3679]

No you still need to do a lot of work in positioning, type of field of view, lighting in the cgi ,etc even animated films get dop's advice and guidance while lighting them.

[@vincenternst190]

2:08 Thor Ragnarok!!!!

[@PHlophe]

7:54 , don't go there

[@hungrysponge634]

Where’s Planet X ?

[@chocogreen1]

5:02 "peterbyte"? lol No! petabyte

[@Whosthat_]

This will definitely fix stupid continuity problems.

[@ninjafukwan7]

so let me get this straight..You are telling an online audience who have seen a billion hours of Andrew Kramer videos. A billion hours of Digital foundry video games graphic analysis. That computers and tracking ball is how movies and now Tv visual effects are made?...in 2018 ?...4 months before 2019? and a few month after the planet saw and fell in love with a 100% CG character called THANOS? Hold... on let me get grandma she might get a kick out of this. just joking ...good stuff :-)

[@creatorblue32]

boy aint nobody fall in love with thanos

[@peterphilip]

Already looks gimmicky. The only thing that it can really do that is special is the whip around in 3D space. This is a shot that has not been interesting since Buffalo 66 used it in a unique way and The Matrix used it up. This seems like a technology that is not made for cinema but more for creating worlds like in VR situations.

[@coolvideos8864]

Whats a peter byte? lol

[@stephenkiran]

Petabyte* = 1000 TB (terabyte)

[@craggolly]

1 Terabyte is about 200 dvds

[@youricadet1557]

Space doesn't have color

[@zakirali8721]

too expensive and still not convincing enough. Virtual Production with Unreal Engine is far more affordable and can bring equally convenient filming styles to the Director and DP.

[@floatingrabbit3556]

Imagine streaming porn with that kind of technology. Every angle. Ok i'll leave now.

[@craggolly]

Streaming? not in a hundred years. The data still has to be compiled together, motion has to be digitally solved and a big team of vfx artists have to clean it all up frame by frame. That's not gonna happen in real time any time soon. You should take your bets on performance captured pornography.

[@demonitized6208]

this channel needs more subs.not fortnite youtubers

[@PresidentialWinner]

7:46 You want to DATE ISIS MEMBERS? How the fuck did they decide this was a good idea for a game??

[@tlmyasirs]

i did the 1000th like :)

[@BlackTigerAP]

100% CGI movies suck. All of them. They are souless and cheap. VFX should be created by imagination and real objects, not pixels. Old movies with "real" VFX are still very much watchable and re-watchable, majority of modern CGI movies are 1-off.

[@maxmac7845]

Spencer...Speak up! ffs

[@Mister.Psychology]

Sorry, but the space graphics at the start are terrible. I have seen better in even mediocre video games.

[@crehenge2386]

Funny to see them brag about how good VFX have become with such horrible graphics xD

[@Miquelalalaa]

No need for cinematography in 2018...

[@newsnk3679]

You still need to position the camera,plan movement, light the scene

[@janithenimal3435]

It looks like shit and costs millions of dollars, what kind of joke is this! 150 hours to make you look worst than a 10€ 3D random guy asset playing basketball on Blender?

[@unexplainedmysteries9540]

So that explains why movies look so terrible today. Thanks BBC click.

[@lennysmileyface]

That western scene looked horrid.

[@craggolly]

because they showed shots that weren't professionally cleaned up.

[@craggolly]

They showed scenes that weren't cleaned up. It's like saying that a half finished car doesn't look too fancy. Movies actually don't look horrible nowadays. The only time you actually notice the effects is when they're poorly done. All high budget movies are filled to the brim with digital effects that noone notices but the one part that doesn't look so good is what all people think to be the only digital effect.

[@lajoswinkler]

Yeah, they look horrible. CGI hasn't evolved beyond what normal cinematography offers. It looks off in color and shadows, edges. Horrible.

[@unexplainedmysteries9540]

They were cleaned up professionally. That was the final result.

[@mimlomiani6949]

GOD Please remove the evil and the viket of this world and remove all of them to Mars....

[@lajoswinkler]

Movies still look horrible with this.

[@producerandy5654]

Honestly looks pretty bad.

[@robinkhan4132]

Glass phone released day please you answer???