The Netflix of History. Use code 'timeline' for 80% off bit.ly/TimelineHistory
@daniellarose93914 жыл бұрын
Timeline - World History Documentaries timeline =adverts= Disgraceful
@leogoco90864 жыл бұрын
SStoryTel
@glendalevers6164 жыл бұрын
I felt sorry for Old Edward
@Deborah-vo1uh4 жыл бұрын
Sr mmmpplm g 76hu hu u hu hu yt? yt? yt? yt?%
@lawngaiyi4 жыл бұрын
Transactions**
@deletedaccount19903 жыл бұрын
His abdication actually turned out to be for the best in the end. We ended up having a wonderful Queen and all.
@thomasbaye48053 жыл бұрын
and look at the letters and phone calls between Charles and Camilla. they are just as disgusting. him Willing to be a tampon .. Poor Diane to have to show you face after your husband said that to an older woman.
@anonymousadult2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasbaye4805 as a woman… if a man said he wished to be my tampon, that would be a deal breaker!! (I’m an gynecology nurse, lol)
@elenikominos74042 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousadult He used the word Tampax😏
@anonymousadult2 жыл бұрын
@@elenikominos7404 I’m that case, bring it on, lol 😂
@MienemLeben2 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousadult 🤣😅
@amandadean39484 жыл бұрын
This makes a lot of sense to me. I never saw this as a great love story. She had dollar signs in her eyes for him and he was a little boy afraid to become king and became obsessed with her. I always got the impression that he loved her more than she loved him.
@Jossianne191303 жыл бұрын
The same story with Harry and that woman!!!
@chasityeverett36683 жыл бұрын
@@Jossianne19130 ..I almost agree. The chances of Harry becoming King in the line of succession is low. But even if that were the case-why do people always vilify the women and not the men?
@NJG05163 жыл бұрын
@@chasityeverett3668 Thank you.
@lilybond64853 жыл бұрын
Don’t compare Meghan Markle with Wallis Warfield Simpson. Wallis would NEVER EVER have disrespected the Royal Family in any way. -- and yes -- according to letters that she had written, she did have second thoughts about marrying Edward -- but it was too late.
@ellenreyes78743 жыл бұрын
You certainly called that right! I was fooled all these years! I am still stupidly gullible.
@kutatm4 жыл бұрын
To lose what you thought you didn’t want, and to spend the rest of your life wanting it back. How utterly sad.
@katemaloney42962 жыл бұрын
How utterly deserving.
@maylynbayani2 жыл бұрын
@@katemaloney4296 cannot agree more
@neytiriavatar1402 жыл бұрын
She deserved it, you should never play and sleep around
@edennis85782 жыл бұрын
She never wanted to lose Ernest; she and Ernest were perfectly satisfied to benefit from Edward's largesse until Edward went full-on stalker. Neither she nor Ernest predicted that.
@nunya29542 жыл бұрын
@@edennis8578 - True. However, the old saying - "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes".
@moniqaf2 жыл бұрын
The only thing worse than the one that got away is the one that won't go away.
@mandymckeown8625 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@RavenIdril29669 ай бұрын
What made Wallis so important to Edward, there were younger and more beautiful women out there so how did Wallis get suck by Edward's side.
@rebeccaanderson51919 ай бұрын
LOL LOL 😆
@rebeccaanderson51919 ай бұрын
@leeannproctor2966 She told him what to do, he liked that.
@roseanne749 ай бұрын
She was a dominatrix, or at least a top. He was a submissive, or at least a bottom.
@splinterbyrd6 жыл бұрын
So often when people want something desperately, and pursue it obsessively, for many years or sometimes even for their whole lives, when they finally get it..... they discover they don't actually want it after all.
@mariakelly41796 жыл бұрын
splinterbyrd Very true.
@taramattiemanieram93176 жыл бұрын
Greedy, selfishness,
@LittleImpaler6 жыл бұрын
So true.
@splinterbyrd6 жыл бұрын
or to put it another way, sometimes people climb to the top of the tree and find there's nothing there
@annbarker17436 жыл бұрын
Electric bikes
@princesskayla14003 жыл бұрын
My grandma used to talk about the Abdication of King Edward VIII a lot. It’s all happened when she was just 15. And she once said it was the biggest shocking event that happened in her lifetime. She said it changed everything. She was 95 in 2016 missed you Grandma
@xanaduxanadu36053 жыл бұрын
That's funny my great gran talked about it a lot too. It must have been huge news. This was in America I'm talking about. She'd say, "Oh how wonderful they gave up everything for love!" That was the American take on it, giving up the throne was a wonderful story. What I can't understand is how ugly and idle she was.
@sabot4ge3 жыл бұрын
@@xanaduxanadu3605 yes thats the american take. we always were anti-King, so we loved any news about the monarchy that was bad. The British have always been depressed because they lost their vast Empire and since then have been relegated to a normal country of 60 million citizens. They are no longer a superpower, and have to depend on America for their economy. When they hear stories about the King abdicating the throne, even though at this point in time the monarchy were symbolic with no real power, it gives them someone else to blame for losing their empire other than themselves. The Brits can't accept the fact that the world simply changed, and a small Island like England could no longer use divide and conquer tactics to control nations 10x its size. So, it feels good for them to blame others for corrupting their monarchy and Empire. The idea of referring to a human being who's no different than you or I as "The King" really bothers me. I'm glad that in the modern world, people will never take monarchies seriously. The idea of a "King" who's been assigned to rule by God is a ridiculous concept.
@5kehhn2 жыл бұрын
@@sabot4ge I'm not anti-King -- I just recognize that the few monarchs left are for the most part out of touch with their subjects, and their subject's plights. It took a WW1 to bring down the public's perception of the devine right of King(s). Human nature is the bridge from prince to pauper.
@Dana94372 жыл бұрын
@@sabot4ge I'll have to disagree. I'm an Anglophile through and through.
@containerjoy58152 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing. We often dismiss how this event affected people at the time. Wishing you joy and peace in her memory.
@pam06264 жыл бұрын
The secret of life isn’t getting what you want, it’s wanting it after you get it.
@MA-20203 жыл бұрын
That's wise!👍🏻
@Bynggo2 жыл бұрын
I think it’s called - be careful what you wish for.
@angellisa26142 жыл бұрын
What a profound pearl of wisdom
@lindaberg16952 жыл бұрын
Prince Harry and his wife should pay attention to how this history played out.
@elaile2 жыл бұрын
Wow 🙏
@gtaylor6937 Жыл бұрын
The thing that moved me most by this account was Wallis' admission that she really didn't understand herself, and that this had been the cause of all the misery of the situation. How sad to think that from that point onward she stepped into a life she didn't want but had brought upon herself. What a horrible life lesson to have to learn.
@girl121310 ай бұрын
Well, she did want power, fame and money, but she didn't see the price tag attached to it. People lose a lot more then they bargain for when they chase after what they believe they want. This is why we have to ask yourselves the "and then what?" question when we go after something. Both she and Edward never asked those questions, so they ended up where they were.
@Roz-y2d10 ай бұрын
@@girl1213 I suppose so. I can’t help but feel sorry for them both. Edward loved Wallis, but Wallis loved Ernest. Sad.
@NoraKlopfer9 ай бұрын
Compared to Megan, Wallis was a lady
@ashscheesecakes20649 ай бұрын
@@NoraKlopfer Omg, give it a rest already. 🙄
@RavenIdril29669 ай бұрын
Wallis played with fire and got ever after burned.
@staceyvanadder60405 жыл бұрын
I watched a documentary detailing their lives after the abdication. I can’t help but feel sorry for the both of them. He was dreadfully disappointed in her. She allegedly sent him home alone half the time they went out together. I heard her name was the last words he spoke, she wasn’t even in the room with him. As for her, she developed Alzheimer’s & since she had no close family, she was mistreated. Her lawyer assumes power of attorney & that was it. With the exception of a couple phone calls to acquaintances, she spent her last YEARS in a bed, while the lawyer sold her priceless possessions. There were no winners here, unfortunately. It’s not a love story, rather, a tragedy
@franreid82034 жыл бұрын
So sad really.
@susie22514 жыл бұрын
You make it sound sinister that her power of attorney sold her possessions. She had Alzheimer’s and needed full time care. It’s completely logical and sensible that her possessions would be sold to raise funds for her care.
@mrsm34424 жыл бұрын
@Flibbertigibbet6 Edward and Wallis ... something similar. It must appear in your recommendations. Very interesting.
@normasouthwood31824 жыл бұрын
@Poklando had Harry's mother not been so good looking she would be judged much worse than Wallis, trying as she did to destroy the house of Windsor.
@rommytize3 жыл бұрын
Indeed very very sad. I watch an interview they gave later in their lives. They both looked dreadfully despondent. And he was so fidgety. Really sad.
@cynthiasmith24593 жыл бұрын
I watch this whole thing with my jaw on the floor. I couldn’t believe the story. Truth is better than fiction!
@astrongmama2 жыл бұрын
A lot has been said lately about Elizabeth's sense of duty. This story really lays the foundation for that. She was 10 years old or so when she saw her father dutifully step in where his brother stepped out. She went on to be exactly the opposite sort of monarch than her uncle was.
@Farrah3002 жыл бұрын
Elizabeth II was totally dedicated to serving the people of the U.K., even when she was Princess Elizabeth. May this wonderful lady rest in peace.
@gregblair51392 жыл бұрын
It should be noted that, since Edward VIII never had any children, Queen Elizabeth II would have been Queen anyhow. Rather than a 70-year queen, shoe would have been a 50-year queen. Of course, this presumes that Edward VIII would not have had any children, and that all the deaths and births would have happened as they did. Had George VI lived outlived Edward (and nothing else being different), he would have been king, and Elizabeth would then have been his heir.
@inahutchings52172 жыл бұрын
A❤. N ❤ )l?$@v
@janicefalkner51372 жыл бұрын
She Sure Was!!! She Was Great!!! ❤❤❤
@hellooutthere89562 жыл бұрын
And king who is not only divorced and married to a divorced woman but his mistress and left a woman shattered in his wake. So where is all that duty???
@philomath672 жыл бұрын
He was obsessed with her like Lennon was with Ono.
@WelshHomo873 ай бұрын
Yeah. Wallis was trapped.
@DavidBarreto936 жыл бұрын
she honestly did the nation a favor.
@siomhe85394 жыл бұрын
you are correct, King Edward was as self centered as her. So Glad King George became king! King Edward and Wallis were both narcissists and the only reason she was upset is that he was better at being a narcissist than her...
@anthonywilliams98523 жыл бұрын
@@siomhe8539 lol
@Mitzi12212 жыл бұрын
Yep
@mumzpoet46262 жыл бұрын
🤣
@petecernan25682 жыл бұрын
Spot on comment,a traitor who should have been on trial for treason
@catnbird6 жыл бұрын
Oh what a tangled tangled web we weave when at first we practice to deceive.
@ladyv56555 жыл бұрын
Also , nothing good ever comes from shagging someone else's husband/wife. Everyone ends up unhappy.
@trawlins3964 жыл бұрын
Wow. How original.
@gwynethnorew46943 жыл бұрын
Echos of another american trying to take on the crown! And who will also fail.
@patk12543 жыл бұрын
But if our wits we exercise, we’ll soon be telling fool-proof lies.......
@georgew20143 жыл бұрын
@@luciaperdue5687 Not even close. Attitudes about divorce have changed. And Harry didn't give up a throne.
@agnesbrown86302 жыл бұрын
Thankfully his brother became King and gave us the most wonderful Queen! I believe it was destiny!
@trishlangford57738 ай бұрын
Absolutely agree. What a silver lining to the mess.
@maureendavidson46356 ай бұрын
That Destiny is called the Line of Succession. Elizabeth was 3rd in line the day she was born.
@KNByam26 күн бұрын
@@maureendavidson4635 Destiny. Elizabeth took the reigns at 25, and held it down for decades. Whatever people may feel towards her she did her duty to her country.
@MICHAEL_MAY_82 жыл бұрын
sounds to me that the "misery" she had to endure was completely of her own making.
@virginiaskahill91038 ай бұрын
And that’s ……called KARMA folks
@MsAuthenticite8 ай бұрын
Like Prince Harry
@Dawn_Aramoana635 ай бұрын
With regret.
@tellyfields29392 жыл бұрын
This just shows that this disastrous relationship caused by their own choices was just as sad and painful and awful as could be predicted.
@annconforti9294 Жыл бұрын
Looks like history might be repeating itself.
@dynastymad Жыл бұрын
@@annconforti9294 😅😅
@saritamullins8294 Жыл бұрын
@@annconforti9294 agree that history is repeating itself in H & M. This duo also deserve each other.
@MRC27665 жыл бұрын
I think he did England a favour. I like the Queen and her family as they are. I’m not sure he could have been trusted during the war.
@susie22514 жыл бұрын
She would have been Queen regardless because he had no children. But yes, it was a very good thing he wasn’t in charge during the war.
@LinaPlancarte4 жыл бұрын
Susie we don’t really know if she would have been queen, we can’t know if England would stand the same way after Edward.
@mockingbird35644 жыл бұрын
@@LinaPlancarte It was the greatest luck to England and the rest of Europe, that Wallis's "little man" abdicated! We would all be speaking German today, had he not!
@annbush18263 жыл бұрын
The recent formal portrait of Queen Elizabeth II with Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Louis spelled out clearly the succession.
@MichaelMeighu3 жыл бұрын
@@susie2251Neither was King George. Churchill was in charge of the war. And he was a great supporter of Edward by the way.
@celiagorleski27162 жыл бұрын
We owe Mrs. Simpson a debt of gratitude.
@patriehl86567 ай бұрын
Cyg😮
@shadrach62992 ай бұрын
Indeed
@SharonCooper-p1wАй бұрын
I believe so
@MrMslealeaАй бұрын
We certainly do..
@PowerhouseCollectiveMediaАй бұрын
People need to stop calling this a “love story”. It was NOT a love story! It was a man who became infatuated & obsessed with a woman who pandered to his childhood fears & insecurities. She was like his mother. Her feelings for him were on the opposite end of the spectrum. They were both individuals with an unstable past that found eachother in unexpected ways & they were definitely NOT on the same page about being together. There was no “sacrificing it all for eachother”… that woman cried when he announced his abdication, because she specifically told him not to give it all up for her. She escaped to France to get away from him, HIDE from him even. She was convinced that a younger model would eventually replace her & that she could go back to her life with her husband & have some great stories & trinkets to show for it. It’s not even tragic love, because Edward was the only one IN love with Wallis. Wallis was more so annoyed & I feel, even had a resentment toward him as they got older together. The man had no backbone & the woman herself, didn’t know how draw the line & walk away to save her dignity & self respect. It was a hot mess for the rest of their lives!
@debbievidal95365 жыл бұрын
I believe she was only in love with the idea of one day being Queen. When she realised that it was never going to happen, she was desperate to find a way out. Too late
@clairepeace57835 жыл бұрын
Yes poor Harry with his American wife ! Believes she acts like a Kardashian !!
@manofbeard5 жыл бұрын
Debbie Vidal definitely, just a fools gold dream.
@staceyvanadder60405 жыл бұрын
Debbie Vidal I agree. She loved the IDEA of him, not the reality
@magnoliabranca51495 жыл бұрын
Claire Peace I actually remembered Meghan I hope it isn’t the same thing :(
@opalfishsparklequasar86635 жыл бұрын
@@magnoliabranca5149 it is.
@jasperhorace26935 жыл бұрын
Of course Earnest was right. Imagine if Wallis had managed to escape from Edward. He wouldn’t have abdicated and she would have spent the rest of her life thinking she should have been queen. Good for Earnest for realising and putting his own interest first.
@surlif2 жыл бұрын
What on earth did Wallis have that these men fell head over heels in love with her???
@marirothbauer5407 Жыл бұрын
Charm and intelligence
@mandymckeown8625 Жыл бұрын
She love bombed her prey . it’s very addictive
@susane213110 ай бұрын
Something was wrong with HIM! Just like something is wrong with Harry!
@annettechaw320310 ай бұрын
Her ramrod posture. .her art of flirting,her fashion sense,and sharp mind.. she just wanted a good life ( not sinful,is it?)
@serenashaw-q3y9 ай бұрын
@@annettechaw3203 She is reputed to have picked up some "means of pleasing men" when in Shanghai....
@matildabanana35162 жыл бұрын
The more I learn about history, the more I understand why Jane Austin’s protagonists are called heroines. They kept their morals, their self-worth, no matter how desperate and bleak their futures seemed. They trusted that God would care for them instead of making excuses and settling for men who were immoral or foolish. It’s so easy to justify poor decisions, and the consequences can be devastating.
@orahallable Жыл бұрын
Speaking of Jane Austen, she happens to be my favorite writer. She only completed 6 novels but I have read" Pride and Prejudice " at least 3 times,maybe 4. and am now re-reading "Persuasion" for the third time.
@girl121310 ай бұрын
She was a single woman in a time where women rarely could be. I'm sure she noticed a lot things about marriage many didn't bother to notice. She never hated her fellow women who wanted/had to get married, but she did want them to understand how they got into their situations with their marriages. "Pride & Prejudice" and "Sense and Sensibility" are especially good at this. If she had ever met Wallis Simpson she probably call her a "Lydia Bennet" type
@NanetteMorgenstern6 ай бұрын
😅@@orahallable
@claudiawhite97725 жыл бұрын
He was a weak and undeserving man who was going to be a king!! Thank you Wallis for taking him since you did English people a big favour!!!👏👏
@yasemindemiray4 жыл бұрын
Claudia White I wonder what type of king Prince Charles going to be as he is also kind of like Edward. Camilla is as manipulative as Wallis.
@ginawiggles9184 жыл бұрын
@@yasemindemiray:There seems to be a pattern with Windsor men. Harry is just the most recent.
@JoLeeR254 жыл бұрын
@@ginawiggles918 Harry was not going to be king Harry had a right to his own life
@militzamadrid4623 жыл бұрын
...i read he has some developmental problems, but he wasn't dumb, he was very Smart in varios subjects.
@temarybaltazar3 жыл бұрын
Right but she was never happy in the marriage
@ohpahleese83065 жыл бұрын
Why paint her as a victim, she cheats constantly. She wanted power, money and fame. Once edwrs abdicated she was trapped.
@marirosy553 жыл бұрын
Most of those guys are always chased by women like that.
@maxwaters63663 жыл бұрын
P
@kbaca94153 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@oceansunflower58943 жыл бұрын
Why is always a woman fault is this man can not think for them selves WOW 😂😳😂
@marirosy553 жыл бұрын
@@oceansunflower5894 kind of difficult to get.🤭
@ginalou57742 жыл бұрын
It is fascinating that Wallis and Ernest were both involved in the loose morality of wife swapping and affairs and that Ernest saw the Edward affair as advantageous to him. That’s really off. She then starts to complain when he wants to shack up with his own girlfriend. The woman she brought in to keep him company. Just gross….🤢
@mommybear29 ай бұрын
You are so right. The whole thing was just one huge mess. You reap what you sow.
@m.st.66577 ай бұрын
The fact that she didn't tell Edward directly that she didn't love him anymore (but then portrayed herself as the victim) makes her really dislikable.
@sylviavarela3714 ай бұрын
That was all fabricated by the Monarchy. She was with him till the day he died. She loved him!
@presidentd.j.tantrump12096 жыл бұрын
Shakespeare himself could have written the tragedy that was Edward and Wallis and Wallis and Ernest. Very interesting documentary.
@glendakeithler1922 жыл бұрын
He did, 400 years ago
@thomasbaye48052 жыл бұрын
and it goes on til today . the only true ones can't have the throne . Harry will make a great king . never Charles nor William
@elizabethwarman90282 жыл бұрын
Shakespeare would also had written a tragedy about Charles and Diana.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
@@thomasbaye4805 it will be a bit difficutl for Harry since he is living in the US, a d is miles down the line to the throne.
@PamBarratt6 ай бұрын
LM ino
@mariebrownmb57brown845 жыл бұрын
Edward was a sad young man suffering from a massive lack of love in his life no amount of money fame or power can replace parental love..
@rses9164 жыл бұрын
True :(
@zzzbbbooo3 жыл бұрын
He was still a not-very-nice or honourable man all the same.
@dianheffernan24353 жыл бұрын
Yet all this behaviors spread mentally like a plague
@sonogabri12 жыл бұрын
He was also a hopeless dope, a loser in every aspect of his pathetic life.
@traceylawrence73632 жыл бұрын
@once a musician it is the cards, who you are and how well you can manage playing the game of life. Everyone is not equal with emotional intelligences.
@CrypticConversions6 жыл бұрын
Apparently Wallis wasn't the dutiful wife to the Duke. She also 'loved' Herman Rogers and Jimmy Donahue. What a character. Yes, I think she was a narcissist and a player.
@patmullarkey76596 жыл бұрын
He was certainly a narcissist, too. Thank god no children to worry about.
@cindyroberts50535 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Megan - why does everyone try to shove her down our throats as the next "Diana"? Not even close!
@cindyroberts50535 жыл бұрын
@Kandy Kandy Oh honey! All you have to do is read. And you're right I don't have to read trash...but it is amuzing to see u get so upset!!! Have a great night!!
@elizabethsheffield66095 жыл бұрын
@@cindyroberts5053 .......not even attractive.
@warrenmarsh56265 жыл бұрын
@Kandy Kandy You seem annoyed that he DOES know. That is why he put the word 'love' in inverted commas. Wallis Simpson was a gold digger and a dominatrix and no one, not even this foolish King so complicit in his own downfall, deserved to be her victim. Such a vicious and unpleasant woman is best avoided. Get over it, Kandy Kandy!
@fayhoward63012 жыл бұрын
I can`t help but see parallels today. An ambitious woman and a child man. Where will it end?
@AprilN-r9g3 ай бұрын
In a divorce court I think
@titob.yotokojr.93372 ай бұрын
But at least she climbed into an empty bed. The modern version had the woman climbing into a bed already occupied by another woman. Both women have similarities: they both look like horses.
@gracewhitefeather14746 жыл бұрын
Excellent documentary. What a tragic pair Edward and Wallis were. He was a man child and she was forced to spend the rest of her life as his mother. A bizarre love story.
@elgingottowik85975 жыл бұрын
Like Prince Charles with his Camilla!
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
Wallis was not forced to spend the rest of her life with him. She set this whole scenario up and ended up backfiring on her. She got played while being the player. I really don't think Edward would have slit his throat. These people major in drama and appearances.
@ellenanderson95355 жыл бұрын
Grace White Feather he used to like her to put a diaper on him like he was a baby -effin weirdo
@victoriaalbastra63254 жыл бұрын
Like MeGain and Harriett
@citizen11634 жыл бұрын
@@victoriaalbastra6325 EXACTLY the same
@claudettemarkovichair6 жыл бұрын
Her life was a prison sentence of her own making. Seeking wealth and status over what is truly important in life will leave you empty. Unfortunately, she got what she deserved and learned a difficult lesson.
@smellycat2646 жыл бұрын
Claudette Markovic sad she chose that
@barbaravick56345 жыл бұрын
Claudette Markovic Got what she deserved? She hardly deserved anything she got.
@IamAries525 жыл бұрын
She never really loved him and, it was obvious!
@Fairyviewroad5 жыл бұрын
@@barbaravick5634 - Why is that?
@opalfishsparklequasar86635 жыл бұрын
@@Fairyviewroad the riches- she was a craven goldigger.
@jimmyjames27552 жыл бұрын
I never believed for five seconds that the abdication anything to do with love. I've always felt the Firm granted Edward a fairy tale ending because they knew that he would be an absolute disaster as King. This doc only serves to underscore that theory. They were both trapped, but as someone said earlier, Wallis was much more intelligent than Edward.
@sharone.langley29232 жыл бұрын
Not to mention they were both friends of Adolf
@bethanyhunt27042 жыл бұрын
They would have known he was a raving fascist, so didn't want him when fighting the Nazis.
@MienemLeben2 жыл бұрын
@@sharone.langley2923 all of them were at that time. The family are of German Descent. Take a look at Prince Phillip's family. Now, I believe we defeated the wrong enemy. The Communists of the Soviet Union should have been squashed. Thats why we are in this current mess. Bolshevik Communists have taken over every aspect in society. Even down to the Church of England.
@squamish42442 жыл бұрын
@@MienemLeben Got any evidence for that? I mean like actual documentation, not "I just know it".
@Blackman194982 жыл бұрын
@@sharone.langley2923 her second husband was Jewish, Simpson father real name is Solomon ?
@kimberlyperrotis89622 жыл бұрын
Diana was put in a similar position, apparently. She didn’t want to go through with the marriage when she realized that Charles was in love with another woman. The publicity surrounding these marriages made it impossible to draw back without causing a life-destroying scandal.
@AnnaBellaChannel Жыл бұрын
If you face is on the tee towel or the mug then it is way too late to pull out as you have to get married.
@annstillwell7306 жыл бұрын
I'm amazed how self absorbed and vile these people were. Sleeping around and openingly cheating and trading spouses. Why bother to marry if means nothing to you. They all deserved what they got.
@TalairanPerigord6 жыл бұрын
@@luv3daysgrace1 Amen. I've never had any use for the Mountbattens. *shudder*
@Consrignrant5 жыл бұрын
+Ann Stillwell..............What makes you so special? They were as "self absorbed and vile" as you.
@Consrignrant5 жыл бұрын
@@TalairanPerigord .Do you know the Mountbattens ? Thought not. Then keep your imbecilic mouth shut.
@reelgirl85445 жыл бұрын
@Ann Stillwell During that era (and ages prior) in the upper classes, more often than not women as well as men married for social status and financial security. Then they had dalliances with other partners for romance and amusement.
@Ana-vs2pw5 жыл бұрын
The movie match point illustrates it perfectly
@5Heliotrope2 жыл бұрын
To me, what those letters reveal is that the only love Wallis ever had was the love for her narcissistic self. Always longing for what she currently cannot have and pathologically never satisfied with what she currently had.
@denisehadfield79952 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of someone else. Megan
@citizen11632 жыл бұрын
@@denisehadfield7995 100% !
@Geewhizzy2 жыл бұрын
@@denisehadfield7995 Yupp! spot on! Harry will end up a trembling and uncertain and defeated a man as he ended up
@marilynbutler11782 жыл бұрын
I feel there is another royal relationship much the same
@nurhadirahathilah9962 жыл бұрын
Sounds like meg mark
@spinozareader6 жыл бұрын
I don't find anything "poignant" about Wallis's letters; they're nauseating. They demonstrate how calculating and sociopathic Wallis was; supremely and always only interested in her own feelings and concerns.
@montereyharris12775 жыл бұрын
spinozareader I completely agree. In her letters to the husband that she left for Edward after taking him away from his original wife and child, she told Ernest that she did not want Edward to leave the throne. I’m not so sure I believe a word of that.
@cherryrotella37145 жыл бұрын
spinozareader Yes, be careful what you wish for. You may get it
@jackbraudon12895 жыл бұрын
Can someone please tell me how Wallis' letters to Simpson ended up in Wallis' attic?
@susie22514 жыл бұрын
The letters are very manipulative
@seye8eyes4 жыл бұрын
Concerns all sounds like a arrangement by two governments one America intelligence and one British intelligence the third party totally secret and silence hall of Europe ruled by Germany with secret partners.Convenience and conscience maybe you should look in the mirror so often it's all about the reflection and relationship of the dollar and the pound currency valuation of conscience of the establishment keeping good relationship with America King Edward and his wife Baroness
@skippyjo24682 жыл бұрын
I do worry that Harry will end up being the same way as Edward, (if he isn't already) but with as much regret as Wallis.
@elcotorro-n9m7 ай бұрын
YA ESTÁ ARREPENTIDO DE SUS ACCIONES MEZQUINAS Y CODICIOSAS CON UNA MUJER TAN FEA Y RIDÍCULA
@anonanon45043 ай бұрын
He wasn’t in line to be king
@Angel-nu7fm6 жыл бұрын
For her to say "none of this was of my own making".....er...can you say denial?
@CherylSimser6 жыл бұрын
Angel 1 She was a true narcissist.
@carolynboyd67965 жыл бұрын
She Knew what she was doing.
@wmnoffaith15 жыл бұрын
I know, right? She cheats on her husband for 2 years and then turns to HIM for courage? And then wrecks the life of the king? The only great thing is by wrecking her own life, and because Edward was a case of arrested development, England dodged a bullet. So maybe it was meant to be
@catherinepositano85445 жыл бұрын
@@wmnoffaith1... They were all as bad as each other!
@catherinepositano85445 жыл бұрын
@@Annie-zd7mx.. Poppycock!
@DeniseEggertwaterlily3 жыл бұрын
Even as an American, I can see that King Edward’s abdication was probably the best thing that could have possibly happened for Great Britain,. If Wallis Simpson wasn’t the reason, another woman whom King Edward had been involved with, could have easily been chosen as the reason why King Edward abdicated . This bachelor King was a partying playboy with many married mistresses ,and a score of other women, whom he had been involved with It seems that he had constant parties , soirées, and dinner parties, but didn’t do anything else. . King Edward didn’t show any concern for the well being of the people of Great Britain. King Edward didn’t do any work at all, and he didn’t carryout the duties of a Royal Monarch , as the Governor of the Church of England,, Leader of the Royal Armed Forces , as a Benevolent Constitutional Monarch, communicating regularly to to the British people, . I’m sure that King Edward wouldn’t have done an 180 degree turn - to actually comfort his people in their losses and sacrifices in the face of World War II., and to show up at places of bombings, to visit military troops, and to inspire them, as his brother King George had done . Great Britain didn’t need a frivolous, partying , womanizing Bachelor King .That would have caused the end of the British Monarchy. His brother King George was the appropriate Royal Monarch . He was a responsible, mature, married family man. He was a faithful husband and a devoted father of two daughters. King George took his position and duties as Royal Monarch seriously . He stayed there in London, in the midst of the bombings by air throughout The Battle of Great Britain with His Queen Consort Queen Elizabeth and his people . His daughters, Elizabeth and Margaret were close by in the Fortress Windsor Castle. King George demonstrated modest middle class living and values . Surely King George demonstrated what true loyalty, duty, and caring for one’s people was . He modeled this before his daughter , the future Queen Elizabeth II. I am convinced that if King Edward hadn’t abdicated, he would have been caused the end of the British Monarchy.
@indrinita2 жыл бұрын
The British monarchy is causing its own end quite fine without needing women outside the family to blame for their depravity and indulgences. And since when did royal families care in reality at all for the peons they consider their subjects, in anything but name only? Are you daft? Aristocracies care in practice for nothing outside themselves. If it appears they do care, that’s all it is - an act to satisfy appearances, nothing more. A means to the end of their justification of continuing to leech off of society and real, hardworking people, while play acting that they’re doing some great service and not just trying to justify their excesses. It’s literally institutionalized narcissism and has exactly zero relevance or connection to contemporary life.
@krystynadey78012 жыл бұрын
@@kkarli874 yes, he also was responsible for king George V being murdered. Kings doctor finished him off. That doctor was Edward good friend.
@patriziavalentini40552 жыл бұрын
La penso esattamente come te. .Le cose non capitano mai per caso ..
@jeannejoseph25962 жыл бұрын
I agree!
@elizabethwarman90282 жыл бұрын
Also Britian would have most like had fought with Germany. Unless Churchill went against the King.
@universaltruth20254 жыл бұрын
Childhood trauma lies behind many ill-fated decisions - mostly people are not driven by malice but are just trying to escape the sadness of their past. He had no parental love, and Wallis was escaping the destitution of her childhood in the only way she knew how. He was basically looking for a mother and she was looking for the approval of a father and societal acceptance. Unfortunately their two worlds collided.
@valkyriesardo2782 жыл бұрын
Only to a point. Wallis was reasonably happy with her second husband. They both got greedy and allowed a third party into their marriage in exchange for perks and status. Eventually the adventure exploded in their faces. I am glad her husband married again but I do not pity Wallis. She could have refused David's offer but that was the last substantial offer she was likely to get due to the scandal and notoriety. She did not have the courage for that alternative.
@ib71322 жыл бұрын
An exellent summary of the situation! Edward was looking for love, Wallis for money, security and an exciting life.
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
That's a lot of couples.
@universaltruth20252 жыл бұрын
@@blippypippy8167 yes it is.
@miaash38702 жыл бұрын
Just as Charles has looked for a mother and has found it in Camilla, and Harry in Megan!
@Mewvision Жыл бұрын
I think David’s penchant to be ruled and treated like a child may have something to do with the iron lady that was Queen Mary?
@monique8641 Жыл бұрын
Probably more like George V who said something like he was afraid of his father, and his children would be afraid of him.
@mandymckeown8625 Жыл бұрын
Oh yes Oedipus complex 👍
@Donna-cc1kt9 ай бұрын
Awe no. It’s moms fault? Gimme a break.
@boondocks80025 жыл бұрын
It seems Wallace treated Edward/David like a mother would treat a son. Maybe that was Edward's attraction to her. Maybe he lacked affection from his real mother.
@cherryrotella37145 жыл бұрын
Dianna/JesusSrvnt J yes his parents were cold and remote. A nanny they had was sadistic to him and siblings. He was emotionally very needy
@Morn2moon4 жыл бұрын
He did lack affection from his own mother... Wallis I'll say was the closes he ever got to what he needed.
@Orphen42O4 жыл бұрын
Edward VIII, like George IV, threatened suicide whenever he wanted to manipulate his prospective wife.
@Lily-ld1kt4 жыл бұрын
Exactly like Charles & Camilla!
@seye8eyes4 жыл бұрын
You are aware the meaning of darling meaning angel King Edward vulnerable like a child without his mother. Darling & Arling meaning 😇 👼 😇 👼 Angel
@jgdays24393 жыл бұрын
None of this people had a moral compass , Ernest ‘ loaning out ‘ his wife to the prince in exchange for a glamorous life , Wallis for thinking she was playing a game where she would make hay then return to her husband , and clearly the not very bright Prince believing that she was with him for his charming personality. Interesting how history is now repeating itself
@SymphonyBrahms2 жыл бұрын
Charles and Cruella de Homewrecker.
@bennylawrence62212 жыл бұрын
Absolutely! Nutmeg and her ginger sock puppet certainly seem to be repeating history
@leanderrowe28002 жыл бұрын
@@SymphonyBrahms Charles and Camilla are both ugly outside AND inside. He never deserved the beautiful Diana, she was beautiful both outside and inside.
@1000paulineanne2 жыл бұрын
MM and PH?
@reneedaughter2 жыл бұрын
@@1000paulineanne nah...he is so far from the throne, it doesn't matter. They are humdrum with their two kids.
@1NYCHombre4 жыл бұрын
Beware what you wish for. Wallace, painted herself into the corner of her actions and consequences, ultimately loveless, she got exactly what she deserved. 🖤
@susandouglas4470 Жыл бұрын
Very dangerous game that Wallis and her husband played. I am sure she could have left Edward if she had really wanted to, because she didn't love him even at that point, and I don't think Edward would have committed suicide either. That is not a good enough reason to stay with someone for the rest of your lives. I wonder if Edward had mother issues with Wallis = substitute mother and abandonment issues? But Very, very sad situation for all of them.
@RobBCactive Жыл бұрын
She wanted a certain lifestyle too much to risk running, Earnest had moved on. The letters sound more like both of them hedging, playing safe rather than love. Emotional blackmail is a reason to run, not stay. But once he abdicated she'd have become seen as a heartless villainess breaking the public's romantic story.
@emilieraphael4431 Жыл бұрын
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes...they all got what they deserved.
@Moss_piglets Жыл бұрын
Sounds like Harry with his mother. It's almost like Oedipus complex.
@Dwinn10055 Жыл бұрын
I always thought that Wallis & her husband were social climbers & it backfired! I really don’t think she was that into Edward 8, I think it was fun having a King pining for her! I think her social climbing back fired & she got stuck, sort of bad karma… be careful what you ask for , you might get it lol
@Dwinn10055 Жыл бұрын
@@Bchgrlathrt yes that’s right! Neither of his parents were warm & fuzzy! Albert was basically abused by a nanny, but the kids were so neglected that it took a long time for anyone else to notice!
@shawnmatthews95946 жыл бұрын
I never perceived their match as a great love story. They richly deserved each other...rather self-indulgent people who lived as spoiled people do. Not fascinating.
@devonseamoor5 жыл бұрын
Yes, spoiled people, I tend to think that such people have had no chance to exercise their muscles to grow emotional maturity and brave times of trouble.
@gaillight75015 жыл бұрын
And, I think, beguiled by German facists. Came off as supporting Nazis.
@michaeld33035 жыл бұрын
He was a Prince of Wales, ill suited to being King and the duties that came with it. He did full fill his royal duties, and was even popular as a young Royal, but there was much more going on politically behind the scenes to this story. Plenty of books and research available on this. His younger brother became King, with his wife, Elizabeth, and two daughters, Elizabeth and Margaret. Edward VIII, the Duke of Windor's neice has Reigned for 67 years as Monarch, and likely for many more to come. Her first born son, is a also the longest serving Prince of Wales. The is precedent, if a monarch can not fulfill their duties for a Regency to be established by Parliament. This last occurred under George III. Obviously, as this story shows, there is also precedent for a Reigning Monarch to abdicate. The current monarch is not expected to do so. Many European monarchs in recent times have, making way for their younger adult children to serve as monarch.
@samuelrs51385 жыл бұрын
@@michaeld3303 I think the Queen thinks herself as being ac actual monarch in the historical sense
@desertdaisymarie69515 жыл бұрын
Shawn Matthews he had a poor and abusive relationship with his parents, especially his father.. I think he was dependant on her not in love with her..
@whaleymom762 жыл бұрын
Did anyone else find it odd that the Church of England "didn't approve of divorce" when it was established in the first place to facilitate Henry VIII's divorce?
@efiaahimah37132 жыл бұрын
Oh the irony and hypocrisy of the Church of England. Only God knows what altars the British royal family was built on. I fear history may not enough to do it justice 🤦🤦🤦
@teslaandhumanity73832 жыл бұрын
It changed for Charles and Camilla
@Username.shalomtoyou2 жыл бұрын
@@teslaandhumanity7383 , yea and for Harry and Meghan. William married commoner .. a lot of improvement in royal constitution 👍
@abdul-rafeeqabubakar57132 жыл бұрын
The Church of England played a game of semantics by calling Henry VIII divorce an "annulment". Meaning in the eyes of the Church, the marriage wasn't legal or right.
@whaleymom762 жыл бұрын
@@abdul-rafeeqabubakar5713 I know. But it was only an annulment after the Church of England was formed and Henry became its leader. After all, that was the entire point of creating it. That still kind of proves my point. "A rose by any other name" and all that. 🙂
@LMM934 жыл бұрын
A classic example of “we love those who don’t love us and want those who don’t want us “
@juanswart31253 жыл бұрын
Very true
@tonimaldonado4915 Жыл бұрын
What a sad story. What a mess they got themselves into. One might almost think them. We're at not for them, they would not have had their long-running Queen, may she forever rest in peace and Paradise. ❤
@loriboufford63426 жыл бұрын
They say that Edward was too (as so was George) scared to death of becoming King. Perhaps, subconsciously this was his survival tactic.
@CUERVOLUMINOSO6 жыл бұрын
VERY interesting, very valid point, pal! - Few are clever enough to consider that highly likely tactic!
@avamiller12456 жыл бұрын
Lori Boufford I was thinking the same thing. Using Wallis as his escape goat.
@annstillwell7306 жыл бұрын
I agree she was his escape plan weather subconsciously or not.
@elcotorro-n9m7 ай бұрын
TAMBIÉN CREO ESO, PUSO DE PRETEXTO A LA SEÑORA WALLIS
@jtidema2 жыл бұрын
This is all very interesting, but I keep coming back to the fact that she spent two years playing this very dangerous game - I'm sure she found it flattering to have the King of England fawning over her, but she could have removed herself from the situation much earlier. No one physically forced her to marry him. She could have gotten out of it by publically spending time with her husband and showing her devotion to him, and refusing to go through with the divorce. In the end, she was not a good person. And she made her bed...
@bridgettstephens55822 жыл бұрын
Agreed; sounds like she was a player.
@dancingfirefly77612 жыл бұрын
From Ernest's letter at the end--to his mother, I think--he didn't want her back. He said that all of the beautiful things had been ruined. Adultery does that to a marriage.
@Anna-Rose-2 жыл бұрын
That's what I said as well. She knew exactly what she was doing. She knew when the line was crossed but continued anyway.
@cjosborne94302 жыл бұрын
He was only King after January of 1936. They had known each other for SIX YEARS before they were married, in June of 1937. These films tend to compress events but six years is not chopped liver. They knew each other very well and she had plenty of time to "tap the brakes." Wallis was "outwardly proper" but she was brittle and shallow. Like a bird, she liked shiny objects. But, he liked HER! They remain difficult to define.
@zainabclement252 жыл бұрын
She knew exactly what she doing and enjoying it. Unfortunately she lost the grip and didn't know when to jump off. She's trapped!!
@jonilane80495 жыл бұрын
She was not a victim. She used men to get what she wanted. It is absurd to imagine her as anything but selfish.
@jbabs1004 жыл бұрын
That is being very judgmental. Things were much different for women then. Marriage was all they had to make their way in life.
@victoriaalbastra63254 жыл бұрын
Just like MeGain today
@azlondon4 жыл бұрын
Joni Lane Well, just like Meghan Markle then.
@luv2travel20004 жыл бұрын
@ Joni Lane Yes. Agree with you.
@jasonmuniz-contreras66304 жыл бұрын
Yeah she was an opportunistic yank
@ghostonewolf72012 жыл бұрын
Be careful what you wish for. I always thought of this as a true love story, such a great romance story, almost fairytale-like. Saddened to learn it was only one-sided. Very sad.
@martavdz4972 Жыл бұрын
Rest assured there are almost fairytale-like love stories, only most of them aren´t as well-known as this one... There even are beautiful love stories among the great and the famous, like Barack and Michelle Obama, Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson. And even Edward VIII´s younger brother had a beautiful love story and a happy marriage 🙂
@ghostonewolf7201 Жыл бұрын
@martavdz4972 I agree with you 💯. Great examples of true love, compassion between couples among respect and communication, and they support each other not just during the good times but in real life difficulties. Thank you.
@Youtuber-cu8ls4 ай бұрын
I dunno, one sided in all relationships if you think about it. Someone always likes one more than the other, unfortunately
@georgiaconti16675 жыл бұрын
Who could, with any seriousness, call this a " love story". Please. Give us all a break.
@christinehermann73993 жыл бұрын
well said! true love would never do the things done here
@oceansunflower58943 жыл бұрын
Winner
@oceansunflower58943 жыл бұрын
Edward was abcess with wallas, Queen was abcess with prince Philip, princess Margaret was abcess with a marry Man Prince Charles was abcess with camila now is Prince Henry love MM if you don't get the love story of this family you tripping or you refuse to see it is in the family. Prince Edward send a treat message to wallas I and people refuse to see it as what really matters 💯⭐⭐.
@Perepetespal2 жыл бұрын
@@oceansunflower5894 What does "abcess" mean? - or were you trying to say obsessed?
@MrsSlocombesPuddyCat2 жыл бұрын
It can indeed be classed as a love story.
@myriamluzeka57882 жыл бұрын
So now we know Wallis was 'really' a player ... and Edward was blinded by love ... very sad ...
@veronicacrabtreehill66084 ай бұрын
Sound familiar?
@dfuher9682 жыл бұрын
Honestly, given his well documented abhorrent, selfish, entitled and cruel behavior his entire life, I have always considered his abdication to be a temper tantrum over not getting his way. And that he regretted his tantrum for the rest of his life and felt, he should be given the crown back - based on his continued abhorrent, selfish, entitled and cruel behavior, even towards his brother, George VI, who financed Edward out of his own pocket and got nothing but vile insults and borderline, if not outright, traitorous behavior in return. As u can probably tell, I have very little liking for Edward. And every time I learn something new about him, I like him even less. Tho I kinda think, he and Wallis deserved each other. Both were selfish, manupulative ppl only in for themselves and willing to use every1 else as pawns. In a way, its poetic justice, that they both got caught in their schemes.
@marleneperry5188 Жыл бұрын
@dfuher968 Try re-reading your above comment and use Harry's name instead of Edward, also substitute megxit for abdication, bother William for brother George VI, and Megan for Wallis. Your comment could be describing the current situation in GB.
@LizzieDripping67 Жыл бұрын
Seems Harry carry’s his uncle genes 🙄💔🙄
@lydiawelch3443 Жыл бұрын
Harry carries his relative's genes in his front pocket, if you know what I mean 😉
@lauramcgarr5554 Жыл бұрын
I find Harry to be very much like him.
@bronwynbeistle831711 ай бұрын
@@marleneperry5188That's really exaggerated. Britain was facing an existential crisis in the late 30s. The abdication, luckily, ended up being the best for Britain, but it could have been disastrous on the brink of war. The fact that you compare Megexit to this moment shows that you have no idea what a real crisis is. What a terribly petty era we live in.
@ogathingo8885 Жыл бұрын
After this revelation, GB has to thank posthumously to W. Simson for saving GB from the king Edward III…
@hedaheda1609 Жыл бұрын
Edward III, really?
@mariakelly41796 жыл бұрын
I agree to a certain extent that Wallis wanted the cachet and gifts that came with being Edward's mistress, but I also think that she expected to be replaced after awhile.
@bettyparrot24644 жыл бұрын
I used to hate her, but in the end, she did us all a favour. He would've made a dreadful king, so it all worked out after all.
@psychologypenguin2453 жыл бұрын
He could have made a fine king. He loved the people and they loved him. It's the damn rules and social stigma of the marriage at the time. They're learning though, now that prince Harry's wife is half black. Although he did say goodbye to his duties as well.
@Pdmc-vu5gj3 жыл бұрын
@@psychologypenguin245 He loved the Nazis too.
@QueenPcontrolstheuniverse3 жыл бұрын
@@psychologypenguin245 he would have made a terrible king. He never wanted the throne or the responsabilities and he would have sold his kingdom to the nazis.
@amyparker98163 жыл бұрын
@@psychologypenguin245 Lmao they're not learning. Have you seen what they say about Megan? British people are still as classist and elitist as they've always been.
@love_agapi_m39763 жыл бұрын
He would’ve made a terrible king
@kaelaleedaley5 жыл бұрын
Regardless of the way this has been put, I really can't feel compassion for her. She knew very well what she was doing and was a really, terminally selfish person. She made her bed and had to lie in it x
@CherylSimser2 жыл бұрын
She lived in comfort and was entertained repeatedly at great expense to others who were taken in by the royal pedigrees. I feel no compassion for either of them as they have no morals or compassion for others.
@jewellclarke65122 жыл бұрын
Imagine being the cause of a King abdicating..... how could she possibly walk away from that? To her it was excitement, but he fell head over heels for her. The love affair was one sided. Although maybe he didn't really want to be King and this was his way out! Noone knows but the two people involved.
@dellahicks72312 жыл бұрын
After all this I've come to the realization our son needs to start addressing me as "My dearest one and only mother".
@mommybear29 ай бұрын
I will make the same suggestion to my daughters.
@StephanieJordan-Smith9 ай бұрын
Love it xx
@gigiarmany8 ай бұрын
😂🤣
@MsAuthenticite8 ай бұрын
😂😂
@lorajacks33673 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Eyewonder32103 жыл бұрын
After reading old books from the used bookstore about his parents and grandparents each written at each time period, perhaps another clue to Edward's life is the mentioned anger and fear he expressed as a boy whenever peers said anything about his future as the King "Don't call me that!". Reading about this made me wonder if he simply found a way out by using "love", which would hopefully spare him condemnation for not wanting the crown. It would be a clever way. Makes me wonder that's all.
@jillybe18732 жыл бұрын
A la Hazza
@cautionTosser2 жыл бұрын
i think you're giving him way too much credit. he wasn't the brightest bulb, as evidenced by his indiscretions with the Germans.
@susanradford57872 жыл бұрын
That a good thought I’ve never look at it like this … Wallace Simpson didn’t even love him it was all about “position” in the royal family
@carolnahigian95182 жыл бұрын
much Truth in your Theory; he married some one who helped him QUIT...
@elenikominos74042 жыл бұрын
@@carolnahigian9518 He was an eccentric.
@michellecalling6 жыл бұрын
People tend to want what they can't have, but if they should get it they're miserable, or they don't know what to do with it.
@PrincessQ-fj9ly5 жыл бұрын
Yes. I agree. I honestly see the story of Wallis Simpson as a lesson of be careful what you wish for. It's quite sad, but I can't see Mrs.Simpson as a complete victim. She does hold some responsibility in the abdication.
@heesukkang29165 жыл бұрын
삼성
@11burnout4 жыл бұрын
Markle
@meghanelaraby2774 жыл бұрын
Prince Harry & Meghan Markle!!
@YourGraceMyLady5 жыл бұрын
Wow, Wallis and Earnest were really SOMETHING ELSE. Cant imagine my own husband pimping me off
@nickisnyder34502 жыл бұрын
I think they've got the interpretation of these letters all wrong. They keep repeating their conclusion but nowhere does Wallace say wished not to divorce him. My interpretation of those letters is that Wallace wanted to have her cake and eat it too. She was telling mr. Simpson one thing and the King something else. She wanted to make sure she still had mr. Simpson on the hook. She wanted them both to love her
@denisehall4818 Жыл бұрын
I think you are spot on.
@sidoniewinterpasternak99386 жыл бұрын
Once Edward renounced his throne, there was no way out for Wallis, she was trapped. Of course, it all resulted from her own behavior, but how sad to spend the rest of one's life with someone one doesn't care for and, on the top of that, to have to pretend otherwise ...
@jimgilligan1167 Жыл бұрын
Loose morals have consequences, no matter the romanticism of the circumstances!
@raveenahayer8082 жыл бұрын
They all made mistakes. Wallis leading Edward on for his money, power and status and gold digging. Ernest being okay with lending his wife to Edward for social benefit. Edward for falling for Wallis and not believing that he deserved better and could do more with his position and help his country. A really good lesson presented here. Lesson: love is truly what has no price: no amount of power, status, fame, position can buy it. Not even royals with their all their money and power can buy it. If you have someone that loves you and you love them back, know that is truly what is important and what matters and truly is priceless.
@phabebarcelona8632 жыл бұрын
Very True.
@freedomlife36232 жыл бұрын
How very true.
@jamiegaylord5842 жыл бұрын
I see parallels between Wallis Simpson and Meghan Markle
@January.2 жыл бұрын
*golddigging
@annaelisavettavonnedozza96072 жыл бұрын
@@jamiegaylord584 Absolutely 💯
@katemoffitt16415 жыл бұрын
IMO, she was just as self-centered as he was. Their relationship was fueled by the fact that she was witty and fun to be around, plus some sort of sexual domination on her part. It’s disheartening to learn of their shallowness.
@alexandrastevan75874 жыл бұрын
SMSB sado masochistic relation
@laurielovett88494 жыл бұрын
Wallace never loved David. No comparison ,Charles and Camilla have proven theirs was the love match of the century
@mariakelly41796 жыл бұрын
Try as I might, I simply can't find any sympathy for her.
@smellycat2646 жыл бұрын
Maria Kelly me neither
@carlbenson80316 жыл бұрын
She saved us all!! If she never met Edward he would still be king, and he would’ve supported the nazis! And ww2 would have been a whole different situation for the worse!
@laaung5585 жыл бұрын
Me either
@happyface47135 жыл бұрын
I am very glad you brought that out, @@carlbenson8031
@mariakelly55 жыл бұрын
@@carlbenson8031 You make a very good point. After WW2, Winton Churchill (and please don't start the "Winston Churchill was a horrible person BS") joked that Britain should put up a statue of Wallis in gratitude because if Edward had of been King during WW2, it wouldn't have ended well.
@Hava_Hadi Жыл бұрын
I actually was assigned to write a paper on Wallis in College 1993. I can’t believe how much wasn’t in print or maybe just my 19 year old lack to attentive detail. I had two takeaways, she was very unhappy and he was quite dim and overtly simple minded. Reminds me of Harry. Always juvenile and lacking the bigger picture. I am not being mean spirited, just drawing similarities.
@veronicacrabtreehill6608 Жыл бұрын
Nothing mean spirited about what you said. I also drew the same comparison that acount of Markle and Wallace.
@Hava_Hadi Жыл бұрын
@@veronicacrabtreehill6608It can be our concurrence! I am sure there are many😉
@raeadams8031 Жыл бұрын
O,hfce2a
@nj3195 Жыл бұрын
Where is your evidence that Harry is dim? Have you met Harry? I have and he is very witty and intelligent. Speak about what you know, please.
@QueenAmethyst55 Жыл бұрын
@@nj3195 🥴🤑🤓
@usagi186 жыл бұрын
It is all fun and games till the rich hook-up wants to abdicate and marry you.
@rochellemarkowitz36946 жыл бұрын
right the party is over when it gets serious
@lzad37645 жыл бұрын
😂
@mariakelly55 жыл бұрын
Also, be careful of what you wish for. You might just get it.
@cathtunstall9095 жыл бұрын
usagi18 band of burns
@tamlynn7865 жыл бұрын
Right?! Her plan backfired big time!
@josephdemello2915 жыл бұрын
The body language between Wallis and the Prince speaks volume . He's leaning toward her and she's leaning away. Security vs love ... becareful what you choose.
@lilanesp35546 жыл бұрын
Lol..she sailed two rivers at the same time and end up in a waterfall..
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
Well said!
@JV-yd4qg5 жыл бұрын
So lit!👌👌👌
@Blissfully-Keto4 жыл бұрын
LOL!
@halcasey34614 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@Iamedsmum5 ай бұрын
How simple he was to have expected any member of the royal family or former friends to have attended their wedding.
@eye_doan_likeit67052 жыл бұрын
“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.” - The Great Gatsby. Describes Wallis and Ernest to a T. Also, the King.
@PJAndersson7332 жыл бұрын
I always thought of Tom and Daisy too, comparing Wallis & Edward.
@lorildiamond4987 Жыл бұрын
Yes good stuff. Thanks
@AnnaBellaChannel Жыл бұрын
There were a lot of upper-class Daisy and Tom's.
@maryettamoody50799 ай бұрын
To sad not good Christians sorry being judge mental
@anairenemartinez1654 жыл бұрын
The best thing about them: they had no children!
@isitoveryet95254 жыл бұрын
She never let him touch her lol He was a pathetic, little man.
@aliwalker76674 жыл бұрын
@@isitoveryet9525 and you were there with them in the bedroom? hardly!
@alicegarcia79033 жыл бұрын
Heartless.
@SindyJ373 жыл бұрын
Word
@anderander56623 жыл бұрын
@@alicegarcia7903 get over yourself...
@sandrabentley81113 жыл бұрын
"She treat him like dirt". Obsession indeed. The worse she treat him the more he wanted her. Hardly love.
@DoubleSaltedEggYolkShark3 жыл бұрын
Oh my…yes. Especially when he got older
@marichikat9046 ай бұрын
There is such sexual love where you just like to be abused. Guess, Edward's kink was that and he got that from wallis. The more he was treated like dirt the more he was obsessed that he rather enjoyed it. But I do think sexual kinks are frivolous and don't last a lifetime. One should indulge in those kinks only temporarily and build one's life around some values/ purpose/meaning. Edward could have let go of wallis and remained a king and all would have been good but it was otherwise. And I also feel it's never love from both the sides. It's more often than not pretension from one side or the other. However, it's said in Hinduism that whatever happens happens for the good and so it did in this case. Elizabeth II deserved to be the queen and so did England deserved her. So all turned out well for the country at last and that's a good thing.
@saundramoody4756 Жыл бұрын
They left out 2 very important facts: (1) Wallis had several affairs during their marriage and (2) Wallis left the former King ALONE ON HIS DEATH BED. So, she was VERY REMISS in following thru with her wifely duties- throughout their entire marriage. Don’t try to make it look better than it was.👩🏾⚖️
@magnoliabranca51495 жыл бұрын
She wasn’t in love with Ernest she just missed her life with him, a life of freedom, with an attractive nice man. Such naïveté lol
@cor39445 жыл бұрын
The “Simpsons” were spies and Wallis recognized that she was sacrificed.
@Orphen42O4 жыл бұрын
I agree that she was only professed love for Ernest because she was so bored with Edward VIII. If any man was the love of her life, it might have been Herman Rogers , a married man she knew from the her days in China.
@auroramvillasor13164 жыл бұрын
Love is blind. At times, mystery n excitement is there, but once taken, d story changes. U cant be sure of anything. No need to insult n believe in yourself.. what ur reading here, could be true or false, depends on many factors n circumstances. In which direction r u in. Love, love is d answer.
@MoniqueSinha3 жыл бұрын
yes, she only missed him when she realized she can't have him and she would be stuck in a life with Edward.
@juliesprik94793 жыл бұрын
No, I think that she really did love Ernest.
@cynthiaslater74456 жыл бұрын
No matter how this story is spun, we now know there was much more going on with these two than just an unhealthy love affair. She was mesmerized by the glitter of the royal world she entered and when it faded, she realized too late what she had gotten into. He was born the Prince of Wales with everyone supporting his immature needs except his parents, the people he needed most.
@Concetta206 жыл бұрын
You hit the nail on the head, I think. From what I’ve read he was known to really latch on to his girlfriends always showing an unhealthy need for a mother figure and that’s what made him so obsessive. Though, I think her relationship with her husband Ernst was also unhealthy. He was a philanderer and hungry for money, and Wallis came from a broken home and an abusive father.
@Concetta206 жыл бұрын
+Anna Ferrara whoops, her mother’s abusive boyfriends.
@lisakaz356 жыл бұрын
Indeed. I see that she played with fire and got burned.
@mariakelly41796 жыл бұрын
Anna Ferrara It's also been mentioned that Wallis expected Edward to replace her as his mistress after a certain amount of time. She may not have seen these obsessed feelings he had for her until it was too late.
@mariakelly41796 жыл бұрын
mrcynthiag This is not about The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, troll.
@TrudyPatootie2 жыл бұрын
There is nothing more painful than unrequited love. Oh Wallis you deserved every tear you shed. 🤨
@ld1655 Жыл бұрын
I recommend that people also watch Edward VIII - The Traitor King Documentary and Behind The Crown, the story of Sydney Johnson. The Edward VIII documentary will further put who he was as well as her (Wallis) into perspective. IMO Britain dodged a bullet when he abdicated. As far as she is concerned, karma is a "B" (based on her final years) when you see what she did to Sydney Johnson following the death of his wife and the Duke of Windsor. And according to royal biographer Hugo Vickers, at the time of Sydney's wife's death a year after the Duke's, Wallis wanted to dismiss him because he asked for more time off to care for his 4 young children. So she fired him (some say he resigned). In any event, 30 years he worked for the Windsors. She was truly a selfish piece of work. No sympathy for her whatsoever.
@jacqueplett18002 жыл бұрын
One thing I have never understood is the attraction between them. Not to be unkind, but neither one was anything to write home about. And as stated by other commenters, Wallis did the world a favor by coming into his life when she did. WWII could have gone horribly wrong.
@judysmith6838 Жыл бұрын
In speaking with a former servant, she abused him and he enjoyed that. She loved the money and status.
@nalafischer9163 Жыл бұрын
I think it was him being able to be a child with her.
@girl121310 ай бұрын
I think it was more of the "childhood fairy tale of love" want a lot of people have when people at the time looked at them.
@iowasenator3 жыл бұрын
I can feel badly for everyone involved in this sad, bizarre episode. Nobody ended up happy, not even the new king. How awful.
@SymphonyBrahms2 жыл бұрын
King George was happy with his family.
@elsajones63252 жыл бұрын
What new king?
@racheldemain19402 жыл бұрын
@@elsajones6325 Edward i think. George VI was a great King and had the support of his wife and Children. He was sadly a very sickly man with lots of health issues which along with the stress of the role of King took him from us at the young age of 56 but unlike his Brother, he did his Duty and helped the Country come through the War by his Solidarity and Support of his People.
@r.22r2 жыл бұрын
@@SymphonyBrahms he was never happy to be king. His family always maintained that being king killed him and blamed W.E
@toosiyabrandt86762 жыл бұрын
Hi Yes! And Queen Elizabeth blamed Edward for the far too early death of her father, at 53 owing to him being projected into the harrowing role of Monarch during the catastrophic times of the 2nd WW. Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over the world government from Jerusalem.
@curlyanneb19734 жыл бұрын
Boy, she was a piece of work. In all these letters she only talks about “her”” dilemmas and always wants that which she cannot have. She doesn’t care for any of the men, only what they were for her comfort.
@KNByam26 күн бұрын
The man she divorced realized that and let her go. He did himself a favor.
@thedeergarden3964 Жыл бұрын
She seems like a textbook narcissist and the worst thing you can do to a narcissist is ignore them. So her longing for Ernest might have been more of a reaction to his rejection than some deep love. She had no respect for Edward I think because a narcissist wants attention but also detests the lowly people who adore them. Sadly I don’t think Wallis was capable of real love. She was a very damaged person and probably had some serious skeletons in her closet.
@winkieblink7625 Жыл бұрын
Both Edward and Wallis were narcissists. They deserved each other. What other ROYAL couple today, BOTH Narcissists, strategized to be together finding themselves MISERABLE? One guess!
@rosehooper7067 Жыл бұрын
@@winkieblink7625 I know who they are,they looked mesirable when the other two are around.Maybe insecure......
@rosehooper7067 Жыл бұрын
The Deer Garden -watch out ,she might appear in your dreams.....who knows what else she can do to you.
@wallyballach9672 Жыл бұрын
A narcissist does not attract another narcissist. They attract caregivers, enablers. He followed Wallis around like a little puppy constantly trying to please her, and wrote her the most cloying love letters a 10 year old child would write, not an adult, and definitely not a man. He could never have assumed the demanding role of a king. I had always suspected that Edward was a homosexual because many feminine men, as he was, seem to be attracted to masculine, dominating women, as she was. And as was mentioned by one of the commentators, she was a gold digger. As a narcissist, she would not have felt « forced » to marry him because he threatened to commit suicide. Narcissists have no empathy and crave to be the centre of attention. She might not have achieved the prize position of becoming queen, but being married to Edward brought her more attention than she would ever have had being married to he ex husband. Her fake love letters to her ex kept him in the loop, as well. It’s a sordid, sad story, but they each got what they brought upon themselves.
@martavdz4972 Жыл бұрын
I know a bit about graphology and her handwriting doesn´t suggest narcissism AT ALL. It doesn´t suggest much manipulation, either - it´s simple and straightforward. She looks like someone emotional and witty, able to express herself succintly, with a strong but gregarious personality, someone who craves company and action rather than self-aggrandizement. There´s some genuine friendliness, albeit vague and impatient and not including anything physical, she obviously preferred getting gifts to giving them. Her personality fills the space, but not so much with her whims or egotism, but with her action. She wants to be original and noticed, but doesn´t consider herself the most intriguing object of thoughts. And, most of all, the handwriting shows incredible amount of impatience and ambition. Just look how her hand doesn´t have the patience to form big upper loops, it just moves forward, forward. And the crosses across her Ts look like they want to burst the ceiling.
@kennethcarlsen89204 жыл бұрын
I love that Elizabeth McGovern does the voice of Wallis👏👏👏
@elizabeths43712 жыл бұрын
I watched a documentary of how horribly she treated him in public and in private, and how Edward continued to "lap it up", however, I now have a better understanding of why. 2 Warped Personalities who got exactly what they paid for, and then some.
@angelforceforyou2 жыл бұрын
Wow I had no idea! Wallis tried to convince him not the abdicate! Astounding!
@smc1302 жыл бұрын
Any loneliness and suffering Wallis experienced was simply what she deserved. She shook up the lives of many people.
@shaz69972 жыл бұрын
Yep definitely agree! Seems like Harry has ended up just like king Edward Miserable 😩 😢and sad 😔 Me again is another Wallis Simpson.
@maryanncarine20752 жыл бұрын
also constant whining for more money and demanding renovations for the Bahamas home they were provided while England was under a blitz
@xxxsaraHelloxxx2 жыл бұрын
She says (l) 10 times in that second letter she read🧐🙄🤮
@marjoriematieriene30282 жыл бұрын
@@shaz6997 i
@appleblossom63822 жыл бұрын
History is definitely repeating itself with Harry and his wretched wife.
@ferociousgumby4 жыл бұрын
I remember my Dad reminiscing about all this, and repeated a little ditty they sang back then: "Hark the herald angels sing, Wally Simpson has our king."
@akrenwinkle3 жыл бұрын
Most of the ditties I recall contained the word Nantucket.
@cohenkane21483 жыл бұрын
That is hilarious. I'm a 39 year old American. I'm here after reading Mitch Silver's book : In Secret Service.
@LolaJay_2 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😛
@MrJeeves4me5 жыл бұрын
The way Wallis mocked the King among those closest to her was wicked and sad.
@MrsSlocombesPuddyCat2 жыл бұрын
No. She wasn't.
@racheldemain19402 жыл бұрын
He loved it when she mocked him as he said that the English Girls were too deferencial and the more she scolded him the more of it he wanted so it was actually him who instigated it.
@lindabidwell67222 жыл бұрын
And now there's Harry...the story repeats.
@jamillahwatkins21682 жыл бұрын
@@lindabidwell6722 no comparison. Harry isn’t in line for the throne.
@lindabidwell67222 жыл бұрын
@@jamillahwatkins2168 Scandal-wise comparison. I am aware he'll never, ever be a King. 😇
@vivientaylor62816 жыл бұрын
Where did the letters come from? The postmark is not one that was used in 1936. How convenient that they were found in perfect condition, strange.
@saritakoeberg6 жыл бұрын
Agree. I smell a rat!
@MegumiMoo Жыл бұрын
Is the actress reading Wallis' part Elizabeth McGovern? *fast forwards to the credits* NAILED IT!