The History of the Rolex Submariner | Bob's Watches

[@erikv1974]

Very nice footage and editing. I dig your voice. Sounds professional!

[@paulaltieri7112]

Erik V Thnx

[@paulaltieri7112]

thanks, much appreciated.

[@SFCB1954]

A beautiful watch with and another great video from Bob’s Watches.

[@raffaelschutzenhofer4222]

Such underated chanel

[@bobswatches]

Thank you!

[@Gunnxorz]

Awesome video!!

[@bobswatches]

Thank you! We had to make an awesome video for an even more awesome watch!

[@MakeItOrLetItBe]

excelent video. thank you. love the patina on most of the watches

[@williamstalvey6920]

LeGEND, and no watch can stand up to the everyday wear and tear, except believe it or not a Seiko 6309, amazing how tough these incredible dive watches are. Thanks for all the Intel on the video!

[@gladyschoiniere3696]

Fantastic

[@markgiles8527]

Hey, if Rolex wasn’t producing its own movements, and they had Tudor models, which were using a different movement than what was used in a Rolex, what is the difference between the two watches? Aren’t all movements based on early packet watch movements anyway? So, they weren’t all that different?

[@thegorn]

"Babs watches video series". He said "Babs" as in kebabs. Mmm kebabs.

[@letsgetlucky_]

LOL

[@spl4028]

Delicious

[@mgh976]

A.290 ❌ Rong number , the right number is A.260 ✅✅

[@darrenfry4695]

Love subs but now days you can get good quality watches that are so much cheaper than Rolex

[@lukespector5550]

That's true. However, it's like a German luxury saloon. We know Lexus is superb, but the snobs run for BMW & Mercedes-Benz.

[@juliengoiran]

how about 16610? forgotten...the most produced

[@bobswatches]

Good catch! That was one reference we didn't have at the time of recording this video.

[@jihariabdelghani9834]

if i have rolex serie 72200 LC5

[@danielheyward8818]

Good place to buy a used sub- BOBS WATCHES

[@paulaltieri7112]

thnx

[@kodenng7316]

Where is 5508?16610?16610lv?116610lv?

[@ticktalk8055]

I was quite sad to see the discontinuation of the cal. 3135. The modest if not mere novel “efficacy improvements” of the new 3235 don’t seem to hold any significant data behind Rolex’s claims. Furthermore, the new caliber design shortens the interval between needed services. Seems more like a greedy business move under the guise of shiny new innovation. I hope that in the future, Rolex will make better decisions in the interest of its customers and not themselves.

[@rolextalk9516]

Trust these guys would offer on your watch call David SW they gave me $10,000 more than these clowns