Get concentrated knowledge from books into 15 minutes summaries by signing up at www.blinkist.com/sciencephile to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out!
@b93183 жыл бұрын
Kk
@de-ja-vu3 жыл бұрын
The voice .. does not match
@Ceylanicus3 жыл бұрын
Hello daddy! I know I couldn't meet your expectations in learning science. But I am good in history.. and I also have your old voice!
@b93183 жыл бұрын
@@Ceylanicus not daddy, is mamma
@unaidhoore40313 жыл бұрын
@@b9318 I am son
@thex-perimenter11242 жыл бұрын
There's no way he just said "oh and your consciousness could collapse the entire universe by just being aware of it" and then said "now let's get into the actually deep stuff"
@garyoakham97232 жыл бұрын
Chim
@mnoypoiuyt65r4w82 жыл бұрын
someone explain this one to me, this ones a doozy.
@warsh1p2342 жыл бұрын
@@mnoypoiuyt65r4w8 tard here, maybe it’s like “you’re now aware that you’re breathing”
@justingopaul20182 жыл бұрын
@@mnoypoiuyt65r4w8 Basically What he is trying to say is that the universe does not “allow” an observer( Humans) to see the fabric of reality, because if we understood how the universe functioned fundamentally then we would have the ability to manipulate reality which would give us the power to destroy the universe. However, going back to “allow”, the universe is not allowing or stopping any action, it is simply impossible for consciousness to be aware of those concepts now or forever.
@Human_traain2 жыл бұрын
@@justingopaul2018 until i was born
@eljando96743 жыл бұрын
oh boy i can’t wait to major in quantum chicken nuggets Update: I just got accepted into a PhD program for experimental physics (my thesis will be quantum chicken NUGGES)
@Gonnie69693 жыл бұрын
Nugges*
@drabnail7773 жыл бұрын
Quantum gender studies. PaTRiAcHY IN INFINITE UNIVERSISES..REEEEEEEEEEE
@ICEknightnine3 жыл бұрын
The nuggets exist in a superposition of being eaten and not eaten.
@Mark-vf3mo3 жыл бұрын
Somewhere in the infinite parallel universes where another "me" uncover all the secrets of the universe. 🤯
@Souler5z3 жыл бұрын
There's a probability that if you don't observe it fast enough it will become a chicken niggets
@zeten___99083 жыл бұрын
I want a much longer video that accurately explains these concepts in depth.
@simon200022 жыл бұрын
This usually is the beginning of a deep dive into the internet meanders
@kero62962 жыл бұрын
try scienceclic english, their videos on this stuff are super good
@zeten___99082 жыл бұрын
@@kero6296 i watch them too :)
@jimmypizza98542 жыл бұрын
In the physics community, if you're looking for a more in depth explanation of these topics we typically recommend something called a 4 year Bachelor's degree (hopefully that's "much longer" enough for you.
@user-xw4od8kb7y2 жыл бұрын
@@jimmypizza9854 ok jimmy boy
@rasinsaresuperiord5291 Жыл бұрын
The observer effect is exactly like when your computer doesn't work until someone comes to check it out to fix it and it somehow magically fixed itself :')
@tachyon5x5 ай бұрын
underrated comment
@arandomboredindividual78553 жыл бұрын
"so what type of scientist are you?" "..." "... a quantum chicken nuggeter"
@zach112413 жыл бұрын
The chicken is both plain AND dipped into sauce until you eat it and collapse the taste function!
@@Physicsvani k so what is related to the comment?
@Physicsvani3 жыл бұрын
@galaxy laser Do check it class 12 physics lectures
@OMN1N3 жыл бұрын
Everybody be gangsta until Sciencephile starts playing Everywhere At The End Of Time
@davisdf30643 жыл бұрын
@@oneofthecancor *starts to develop dementia
@iamabigcrazyfanb60153 жыл бұрын
hello mortals
@commie2813 жыл бұрын
@@oneofthecancor holy shit
@jeltje503 жыл бұрын
I really love how that album has slipped into mainstream.
@santiagoparera55313 жыл бұрын
superdeterminism?
@typicalbootss5862 жыл бұрын
I like to think of multi universe theory like someone looking down a mirrors facing each other, the further it goes down the more things look slightly different. If you go far enough the possibilities are quite literally endless because each instance sparks another.
@MrKenpokarate2 жыл бұрын
Just to clear up know that "observing" doesn't mean to just look at it. Observing something like an electron requires us to hit it with some sort of wavelength. It literally interferes. It's not like the universe knows when you're peeking at it.
@andistansbury43663 ай бұрын
OHhhhhhh that makes more sense.
@ScorpoYT3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, the Floor is made out of floor
@Random_.3 жыл бұрын
I wanna collapse reality
@profile11573 жыл бұрын
I wish i could know everything in the universe
@parallaxdawn25463 жыл бұрын
And that floor is made of virtual particles appearing every trillion Nano second making string, so the floor is actually made of 11 dimensional strings in a 2d way.
@gabrielk.21253 жыл бұрын
The floor is made out of everything, and also not
@wilberforce69913 жыл бұрын
The floor is both the floor and the ceiling until observed
@FancyRaccoon03 жыл бұрын
Jokes on us, this is at the very top of the iceberg and the rest is stuff we yet don’t understand or can not even comprehend.
@soosarmand95063 жыл бұрын
Possibly
@skillerrx3 жыл бұрын
Its not like we really understand these things either
@LordofSyn3 жыл бұрын
The joke has always been on us. We are arrogant enough to believe we can tame nature. That's pretty damn funny. Nature doesn't care if we succeed or fail or that we even exist. Once we understand that better we will have tough decisions to finally make instead of passing the buck.
@arpitthakur453 жыл бұрын
@@LordofSyn we are not different from nature, we also come from the same nature...we are a part of it...
@arpitthakur453 жыл бұрын
@@LordofSyn so maybe nature is also arrogant...
@VoxVocisCruora Жыл бұрын
The Observer Effect always makes me feel incredibly unsettled because that implies that somehow the universe can tell that something is being observed enough for it's behavior to change. There are so many layers to that onion and I want to peel back exactly none of them because I'm terrified of what I'll find.
@user-zz3sn8ky7z Жыл бұрын
"observing" in the context of QM isn't what it means in casual conversation, it means that something is directly interacting with the particle. It doesn't just "feel" that a conscious observer is looking at it, but instead it's just affected by the photon we have to "throw" at it in order to "see" it
@icreamsogood Жыл бұрын
S tier troll
@oscarfeeney2215 Жыл бұрын
Observer effect is just saying in order to observe something, photons have to be thrown at them, right. But photons carry energy (e = mc'2 ) so therefore particles fall out of their superposition, or their state/location is adjusted due to the energy gained, thus humans cannot truly observe something in its natural state
@rekttt_7374 Жыл бұрын
That's not how it's actually work i believe. I recommend watch sabine hossenfelder video for better understanding, the title is "consciousness and quantum mechanics"
@yum8666Ай бұрын
That's just god being shy
@timon64812 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="51">0:51</a> i love how there is a ghost leaviathin just chilling there
@luboisfat3 жыл бұрын
Correction for a very common misunderstanding, OBSERVING in quantum mechanics means INTERACTING with the object, it's not the fact that there is a CONSCIOUS OBSERVER LOOKING at the wave that makes it collapse, but the fact that there is PHYSICAL STUFF INTERACTING WITH IT, in this case photons.
@104182 жыл бұрын
👌🏻
@WeebSlayer272 жыл бұрын
Need to pin this comment
@nokia86462 жыл бұрын
He did mention that in the video
@arstans17772 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, I thought it was weird and was gonna look it up..
@eliotmontesinopetren17642 жыл бұрын
Yes this is important. Speed of information is symmetrical to speed of light at maximum because it must travel through a medium.
@gianni36113 жыл бұрын
Sciencephile the AI: "Hello mortals" Me: * watches <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="642">10:42</a> * Me: "Well well well..."
@gallifrox60993 жыл бұрын
"I am uncountable parallel universes ahead of you!"
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="181">3:01</a> heisenberg from breaking bad. he said it.
@regfcvbn7424 Жыл бұрын
the one who knocks
@shesagoodgirl2 жыл бұрын
great stuff mate, i love the style and the info is as detailed as you can get int the time .....giant thumbs up and sub :D
@dacord64483 жыл бұрын
"Hello mortals" never gets old
@Yellow.18443 жыл бұрын
But Mortals do tho😳
@albiql53693 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/MKi8s-KYYlL4TyjtHzZHIw
@fermanhegelein6143 жыл бұрын
History keeps getting old and young at the same time kzbin.info/www/bejne/an_coJumj9l1mMU
@skoovee3 жыл бұрын
@@Yellow.1844 😳😳😳
@appleslover3 жыл бұрын
It's scary
@VIRTUALHORIZON-0013 жыл бұрын
Me: Oh boy another video finally! Everyone at the end of time: plays Me: oh
@albiql53693 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/MKi8s-KYYlL4TyjtHzZHIw
@BloodWorkxd13 жыл бұрын
I recognized it as well and immediately had an existential crisis in the first intervention but I guess that's what happens on this channel anyways so it fits the theme :D
@boyplusminecraft3 жыл бұрын
mood
@Ceylanicus3 жыл бұрын
IKR, was waiting waiting waiting
@baconinvader3 жыл бұрын
I wonder why he used it
@pieterdebeer6892 Жыл бұрын
Your use of the dementia track is so subtle but so awesome. That s#1t is scary bro. Great content!
@dineshsadhwani37172 жыл бұрын
Just love how the music becomes sinister as we move down the iceberg. Great stuff
@rugvedtamhan3 жыл бұрын
Note how the usual background tune becomes more unclear and static the more you go down. That to not just at end but through out the video. Applaud for the details man.
@bell20233 жыл бұрын
It’s not the usual background tune, it’s segments from Everywhere at the End of Time. (The degradation is part of it, it’s not added on in this video)
@8bit_cat723 жыл бұрын
It's about dementia
@commie2813 жыл бұрын
If you haven’t checked it out, look up everywhere at the end of time. Interesting stuff and depending on the person it will make you a certain level of sad
@piethedye39483 жыл бұрын
@@diedie865 *4x as long
@S3aCa1mRa1n3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the music in the ending of the shining.
@kommienezuspadt.3 жыл бұрын
OOGA BOOGA BOOGA
@ryscalwis44603 жыл бұрын
switched with the many worlds theory
@bonniedean94953 жыл бұрын
@@ryscalwis4460 it really doesn't matters but its an interpretation, not a theory
@xx_xxxxx_xx48003 жыл бұрын
spooky stuff
@perk-30283 жыл бұрын
@Isaac MacKinnon it’s a theory that all the electrons in the universe are the same single electron
@girishc35733 жыл бұрын
@@perk-3028 how could there be only one electron there is no way superposition could allow all the atoms in the entire universe to have only one electron
@roopasharma322 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="272">4:32</a> "no no no " 🤣 i died welp this too funny
@liamnilssonIFS2 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="563">9:23</a> ok that actually got me lol
@TheViestaFox3 жыл бұрын
Yo, got chills from that quantum suicide thing because that's a thought I've had. Everyone who dies just wakes up in a universe where they survived. I had also wondered to what extent the splitting timelines goes. Crazy stuff.
@wolfetteplays88942 жыл бұрын
Shit I thought about that while playing Undertale earlier and was like “what if I’m god and Frisk is just a normal kid confused as hell as to why they’re coming back?” Could be in another universe I suppose
@Sexoooo2 жыл бұрын
Hey you, you finally awake
@Peni5_h4rd Жыл бұрын
@@Sexoooo skyrim moment
@toorusatorou89 Жыл бұрын
so what happens when u age
@neo-filthyfrank1347 Жыл бұрын
There is no difference between your consciousness and other consciousnesses. What you perceive as "my mind, my continuity of experience" is an illusion. You've drawn a box around that which there is no reason to. You do not go to a timeline where you survive. You can still die from your perspective. Your "box" is fake and is not privileged.
@wizardish12643 жыл бұрын
Hello mortals Sciencephile is the only being that can say this where people are happy about it
I mean I wouldn't be mad if someone called me mortal
@Fb-gj5rn Жыл бұрын
There’s one thing that was left out that might be at the deepest level. It’s called “Penrose-Hameroff theory of quantum consciousness.” And it really gets interesting the more you look into it and think about what we know of our university/reality.
@sirtykai38212 жыл бұрын
I love your sense of humor in dark places. Just explained how consciousness breaks reality. Then compared strings to "big dog" beautiful
@unironicdoomer6143 жыл бұрын
The use of Everywhere at the end of time was a great decision for looking at the iceberg slowly destroying your mind.
@gugancapuzzi18553 жыл бұрын
Yeah but it freaked me out, that album is scary on a deep level
@oscarstaszky19603 жыл бұрын
@@gugancapuzzi1855 for me the album was literally almost like that one aspect of yourself that you would never want to accept and to say that its a freaky album is pretty much an horrifyingly damned understatement on my part
i’m so glad i wasn’t the only one who picked up on that
@thegrandt6043 жыл бұрын
So what I've learned is that quantum physics is essentially the universe's magic hat-trick book and every time one tries to observe it closely, the universe effectively just puts it's hands over the words and gives you the stink eye till you look away.
@ethanslater29592 жыл бұрын
Sounds right to me, can’t understand the universe till it slips up in some way
@paulmichaelfreedman8334 Жыл бұрын
OK, but the idea of consciousness collapsing quantum states? PUT IT OUT OF YOUR MIND. It's not true.
@thegrandt604 Жыл бұрын
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I mean unless you have demonstrable proof you can't really claim it to be false. Just like we can't say it's true unless we find genuine proof of it. As it stands it's still a scientific theory, neither true or false until we find further answers.
@paulmichaelfreedman8334 Жыл бұрын
@Souven Tudu Actually I stated the opposite of what you claim.
@platogkrone7161 Жыл бұрын
@@thegrandt604 "scientific theory" implies that it has significant evidence supporting it. It is a hypothesis.
@Mister_BIack3 жыл бұрын
Tbh the "One Electron Universe" theory sounds extremely interesting to me. What if the cycle of the universe in a big circle where after the time everything starts to decay the electron travels back in time to start the whole cycle again? Like that one episode from Futurama where they travel so far into the future they eventually witness the creation of the universe. Twice. So the universe doesn't start from nothing because there already was something there that wasn't there in the beginning.
@yum8666Ай бұрын
Eternal recurrence.
@crazygamerf4509 Жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="410">6:50</a> had me rolling🤣🤣
@minecrafterjonowono3 жыл бұрын
The Observer Effect is just there to reduce lag
@wolfetteplays88942 жыл бұрын
True
@whatevs536652 жыл бұрын
Your brain manipulates time to reduce lag already. Look it up.
@rohannbacolod78143 жыл бұрын
A specialist of "Science" and "Memes", best teacher anyone would love
@NG-rb9xz3 жыл бұрын
Try Historyphile the DH too. Same style videos, with the AI voice, but about history.
The Observer Effect is an extremely convincing argument for us living in a program: The engine doesn't render the object until the players observe it.
@cipher11442 жыл бұрын
No
@Rhaxin2 жыл бұрын
And the bible was convincing because people didn't understand where we came from. Give it a few years will you. We didn't do this shit for more than 100 years and you're already clinging on to an unfalsifiable hypothesis.
@celestialbalisongs36512 жыл бұрын
Perhaps when the engine was built, the creators did not predict us getting to the stage of being able to observe things such as a single electron, so now they are frantically trying to make an update before we find exploits and bugs to do with it
@watchmychannelorelse Жыл бұрын
That would take a massive amount of coding and energy to do, since you'd have to make every individual particle and code what it does, how it interacts, and making it vanish.
@nivyan Жыл бұрын
@@watchmychannelorelse My point has nothing to do with the code/amount of work required to do anything. I'm only pointing out that it's an extremely common practice in programming to show/enable things in fragments depending on the context. For example, when you're on the page of this video - your computer doesn't download every other video on youtube, it only downloads the one you're currently on.
@tomis78952 жыл бұрын
I love how the music changes the deeper down you go
@stormanimations54223 жыл бұрын
I like how he narrates the videos himself but makes it sound mechanical. Really sells the smart robot schtick
@rxxxign2 жыл бұрын
he uses a text to speech generator
@sawc.ma.bals. Жыл бұрын
It's text to speech 💀
@stormanimations5422 Жыл бұрын
@@sawc.ma.bals. yea I might've been drunk when I wrote that.
@samilajami Жыл бұрын
@@stormanimations5422 you really sell what then. Come on. Say it. #ФЕДФЕД
@pepe_de_phroog2.0333 жыл бұрын
Everywhere at the end of time, amazing
@marcusaasjensen3 жыл бұрын
At this point, this has become a meme
@pepe_de_phroog2.0333 жыл бұрын
@@marcusaasjensen yea
@davisdf30643 жыл бұрын
@@marcusaasjensen Always has been
@Ceylanicus3 жыл бұрын
hmmmm....
@janmaverickjuat36663 жыл бұрын
I noticed that sound as well, something familiar... or is it? can't think straight
@Darrell9002 жыл бұрын
I am soooo happy that you sponsored blinkist! I’m just sooo excited!
@aidenvu81062 жыл бұрын
Sciencephile the AI isn’t real, no way he can hurt you Sciencephile the AI: <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="517">8:37</a>
@arthillidan19053 жыл бұрын
I was expecting a normal ice Berg video but eateot started playing and hit me like a bus
id like to hear more about that electron one, thats one i legit never heard about and sounds like good vid meterial
@piethedye39483 жыл бұрын
ye im winning
@garvitpandia80592 жыл бұрын
That's Ydse , Youngs Double Slit Experiment
@ohjahohfrick98372 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5XUpYpvgtiffM0 this video is about exactly that
@ArtamisBot2 жыл бұрын
It's easily the coolest one on this list...
@dennicam24282 жыл бұрын
@@ArtamisBot not only the coolest, but also one of the most mind bending ones. In what way could just our observation literally change the behaviour of a particle. Its absolutely crazy and ever since ive heard of this experiment i cant see things the same anymore
@leilanicreal8740 Жыл бұрын
Great vid 👍
@LoveLifeEl2 жыл бұрын
Thanks blinkist for sponsoring the video
@derek77263 жыл бұрын
“I bet you have never- MEET YOUR PILLOW” ad placement is on point
I actually have a theory regarding quantum tunneling and dark energy: What's outside of our universe is no different than what we call a vacuum within. Like blowing a bubble, you can make the bubble as big as you want by adding more air, but the air is no different than the air outside of the bubble, there's just a confined space. Imagine that the universe is just a bubble in the void that has allowed particles to come within reach of each other to create objects like stars and such. Just like a bubble, adding more of what's outside to the inside will make the bubble bigger, and since our universe is expanding clearly something is being added. My theory is that "dark energy" is something that originates outside of our universe, and through quantum tunneling makes it's way into our universe without breaking the seal, and since the universe is big, there's a lot of dark energy that can seep in, and as the universe gets bigger, there will be more and more opportunities for dark energy to quantum tunnel in. This creates the exponential growth.
@aekaralagonisi2 жыл бұрын
There really isn't an "outside" though.
@iammatthew47972 жыл бұрын
@@aekaralagonisi If the universe is not infinite, there is an outside, since there is space beyond the edge
@jazzman78422 жыл бұрын
@@iammatthew4797 except if there isn't
@banter21432 жыл бұрын
@@jazzman7842 damn bro that's revolutionary
@jazzman78422 жыл бұрын
@@banter2143 ikr im such a genius
@primedime6819 Жыл бұрын
your content is amazing. i love it
@krisspychissp Жыл бұрын
Oh thanks! I’ve heard of the double slit experiment and wave-duality, but didn’t fully understand it until now. thanks!
@h6shbrown3 жыл бұрын
“If a tree falls in the woods, but there is no one around to hear it, does it still make a sound?” Schrodinger: “It makes a sound and no sound until observed”
@stotoffosto33933 жыл бұрын
This is actually a good solution to that question
@Srae173 жыл бұрын
@@helloworld9064 Interesting. Maybe this observe thing is used by the Gods to keep our simulation from lagging hahhhaha.
@anon354683 жыл бұрын
So by installing cameras and observing satellite we are making it lag makes sense
@shreyaskashi79223 жыл бұрын
It does make a sound but we won't hear it
@alexpage59243 жыл бұрын
"If you're fallen in a forest and there's nobody around, Do you ever really crush or even make a sound?" 😃
@Ben-fy3dl3 жыл бұрын
I got chills when I heard everywhere at the end of time
I just love his explanation of the observer effect; it's like the universe is interacting with us, and choosing to say "fuck off!" while we try to uncover its secrets!
@Jay_A_Comenter Жыл бұрын
Fun fact, one of the songs used in this video is called “A burning memory”, it originates from a 6 hour long album called “Everywhere at the End of Time” by The Caretaker (I think). <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="62">1:02</a> is where a part of the song plays (I think almost all songs in this are made by The Caretaker)
@Ceylanicus3 жыл бұрын
Hmm... less people have seen my videos.. even less know that I exist.. but not for very long.
@parithyagaorg24723 жыл бұрын
You got my sub! I watched your videos, and they are a nice rio-off of sciencephile.. and I love them. Please create more soon
@creativename7733 жыл бұрын
Yoo it’s his kid SCIENCEPHILE NOTICE HIM
@fermanhegelein6143 жыл бұрын
@@parithyagaorg2472 Historyphile the DH got my sub too.
@NG-rb9xz3 жыл бұрын
Sciencephile looks like a brain and Historyphile is a hand
@de-ja-vu3 жыл бұрын
@@creativename773 The eldest son
@chewedgum30013 жыл бұрын
You're not the AI we deserve but the one we need
@mikethegoo2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I kinda forgot about that... It's REALLY weird how things behave weirdly, but when you say "okay, then show me how you do it!" It will just go "Nah". It's almost like when you do something really hard or weird, and you keep doing it, and when you say "HEY MA, LOOK WHAT I CAN DO!" suddenly, you keep failing. And when you give up and she goes back, you try again and you naik it again.
@appleyt67572 жыл бұрын
the last part was very relatable
@francis_the_cat95492 жыл бұрын
really good video, I knew a surprising amount of deep stuff but sitll learned something
@dubeeisbsishawijsbcisnnaiw44333 жыл бұрын
I still shocked you dont have 1m subs yet. Your videos are amazing and nicely explained. I recommended your channel to my friends who love science.
@Yokuyin3 жыл бұрын
Some topics a few layers lower: Bose-Einstein condensates, Vacuum Energy and the Quantum Eraser.
@nategof23623 жыл бұрын
BECs are relatively basic concepts in Quantum statistical mechanics, sonoluminscence on the otherhand...
@beaconblaster333 жыл бұрын
don't einstein like hate quantum theory?
@beaconblaster333 жыл бұрын
@ayy lmao vacuum energy is just energy of anything else
@@beaconblaster33 Not hate. For his time, it was super hard to grasp mathematically...and to be fair, it still is.
@Captain_Canuck1172 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="439">7:19</a> I got an ad as soon as he said “shu”
@user-dq5ri8je5y7 ай бұрын
I love how the ominous music came along as soon as string theory came up
@lord_z01official53 жыл бұрын
Actually the One-Electron thing may be an interesting interpretation to Heisenberg's uncertainty. What if not only position and momentum are superpositioned, but also time, or even maybe only time is the one that is uncertain? Imagine a particle has time superposition, that would mean that it has diferent "states of time" at the same moment, and that when observed, the universe will chose a random moment in time to manifest. So, the Universe will chose an "A moment" in which the particle has momentum and positions values, or a "B moment" with different values and so on. Its like having a bunch of photographies of different moments in time in your hand and picking up one with your eyes closed.
@taymorrison2 жыл бұрын
There actually is an uncertainty relation involving time, except time and energy are the conjugate variables instead of position and momentum. It basically means that quantum states that exist for only a short time can’t have a well defined energy. It should be noted also that that’s not where superposition arises from in quantum mechanics. It has more to do with solutions to the Schrodinger equation, which guides the dynamics of qm
@MrDudieNoodles Жыл бұрын
@@taymorrison I think it is important to note that the time-energy uncertainty is not analgous to other types of uncertainties, such as the Heisenberg uncertainty. Long story short, physical observables are mathematically represented by operators, eg. A & B. If A & B commutes, that is [A, B] = AB-BA = 0, then it is possible to find common eigenstates of the state (Not necessarily a wavefunction!). If, however, [A, B] doesn't equal zero, an uncertainty relation will arise. This is not physics, just pure math. The heisenberg uncertainty principle is given by the canonical commutation relation of [Q, P] = -ih/2pi, with Q being a position operator and P the momentum operator. Key note being, that both Q and P represents dynamical variables, i.e. measurebale characteristics of the system at any given time. BUT - time is NOT a dynamical variable (At least not in a non-relatistic theory such as QM). You can't just go out and measure the "time" of a given particle, as you might Q and P. Time is the independent variable of which the dynamical observables are functions. The time associated in the Time-Energy uncertainty is a change in time (DeltaT). This DeltaT is the time it takes for the system to change substantially, or more precisely: The amount of time it takes the expectation value of an operator to change by one standard deviation. And this is entirely dependent on the observable you decide to... well observe. It could be Energy, but it might as well be position, momentum or any other physical observable. So - point being that the Energy-Time uncertainty does not tell us about some fundamental property of states (or particles, if you will), as the Heisenberg uncertainty does, but simply manifests as a consequence of time being the independent variable that all oberservables is a function of.
@watchmychannelorelse Жыл бұрын
HEISENBERG FROM BREAKING BAD
@doodlebro. Жыл бұрын
damn didn't realize yall were actually smart while im over here thinking that eventually we'll just abuse virtual particles and zero-point energy like hell and be matter manipulating *literal gods*
@taxx162 Жыл бұрын
@@doodlebro. same i got dizzy tryna read that
@cgm3953 жыл бұрын
I love how they used The Caretaker - Everything at the End of Time for the Quantum Physics knowledge iceberg.
@cotramo68302 жыл бұрын
That ad placement was *chef’s kiss*
@NarutoUzumaki-rl5yl7 ай бұрын
Perfect timing. Right as the video said “and now to the deep stuff” an ad played saying “how many subscriptions are you paying for”
@rimondas67293 жыл бұрын
*In this video the explanation of the observer effect is simple in comparison with others.I actually learned a great amount of hard topics(basic)in just a 11 minutes video.Thanks*
@iceman80753 жыл бұрын
I need the next part I need it we need it. Love your videos by the way, been watching for a year or so now. Good Work
@nkosiezikalala5267 Жыл бұрын
Genuinely been trying to understand Wave-Partical duality for 4 years and I finally get it. Thank you also wtaf
@MD-pm6nc2 жыл бұрын
Very good video
@user-wh5se3cb2y3 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="669">11:09</a> actually there will never be 0% chance of surviving. Even the death of the Universe because of entropy have a small chance of not happening with the quantum tunneling
@Fedico70003 жыл бұрын
_ohfucc_
@dioptre3 жыл бұрын
oh fucc, that means i will never die
@user-wh5se3cb2y3 жыл бұрын
@@dioptre, and worst of all, “quantum immortality” doesn’t mean “quantum good health”. I mean, you could theoretically still live with brain damage and without your limbs in a scenario with nuclear war or something
@dioptre3 жыл бұрын
@@user-wh5se3cb2y ohhhhhhhhh man. ohhhhhhh god. ohhhhhh no i want to forget reading this.
@giantsfan7143 жыл бұрын
Is it like this? You have cancer. You are supposed to die in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Dead. You are dead. Your family members watched you die. But, wait, your still alive? Nobody watched you die? Due to the chances of you surviving are above 0, you are alive, but everyone watched you die, but also see you alive. In another universe, you are dead. They watched you die. In this universe you are alive and Nobody watched you die. This continues for all eternity until your chances of survival are 0? Idk if I got the concept right but I think of it in this way
@pepapigkiller66543 жыл бұрын
IVE BEEN WAITING SO LONG
@derasiate50352 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="283">4:43</a> I already learned that in school but the way you explained it just made me laugh about the weirdness that we just accepted in school because our teacher told us to
@mishanya11622 жыл бұрын
One of the best vids ive seen
@Yep_Yeah_Okay3 жыл бұрын
I just love how funny and interesting you show these types of things.
@TheIRSWillNeverCatchMe3 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="117">1:57</a> that gameplay was straight heat
@default25913 жыл бұрын
This channel is criminally underrated
@keveakshipsail9073 Жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="668">11:08</a> OH BOY!SCIENCE PROVING MY DELUISIONS RIGHT
@andreabarbieri67513 жыл бұрын
Honestly one of your best videos ever. Really enjoyed it and made me make a few researches on google
@mikewilliams11403 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="680">11:20</a> “I bet you have never heard of …” Heard of what!?
@CoolguyMcCool2 жыл бұрын
I'm the type to watch KZbin videos to learn this stuff, so I thought for sure id learn something new after the second part of the iceberg. Other that that, it was a cool video and gave me some new perspectives
@terryfunk17282 жыл бұрын
That was the smoothest transition into an ad that ive ever seen.
@willenfinger31073 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the deteriorating dementia music as you go deeper down the iceberg, it’s a nice touch.
@RobloxSucks3 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the next part. I thought i wouldn't understand anything but it turned out pretty interesting
@RealJackBolt2 жыл бұрын
Everything you listed before the bottom part was in my school's 11th and 12th grade chemistry and physics textbook.
@miedzianytv89872 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="419">6:59</a> ok, then why not communicate using frequency of these changes?
@cassketti77983 жыл бұрын
Is this what people mean by “if a tree falls down without anyone seeing it, will it make sound?”
@alnaskabeer13613 жыл бұрын
sure it will, if someone is nearby... but we dont know if it would when no one is there to listen...
@MattJDylan3 жыл бұрын
That saying basically talked quantum physic before quantum physic was a thing...
@xx_xxxxx_xx48003 жыл бұрын
philosophically speaking, we can't know quantum speaking, it would be in a superposition
Me: Casually watches KZbin Skynet: Right level two take it or leave it Me: Knew all ones except one electron universe
@mitchellbarton79153 жыл бұрын
I heard of the quantum suicide. I've honestly been scared of that being a possibility.
@CosmicHowlerx2 жыл бұрын
Love the background music 🎶 "Heartache, heartache~"
@love2o92 жыл бұрын
The only one I didn't know about was the One-Electron universe
@red_doggo72193 жыл бұрын
As a child I remember asking dear old Pa about quantum mechanics once. He said, "Son, quantum objects are like a woman. They get weird when you watch them and can be both particles (as all physical beings) and waves (when they're yelling at you)." Pa was a little old fashioned.
@borisleoro89432 жыл бұрын
Looool
@mrdre3628 Жыл бұрын
Based Pa
@kaystephan26103 жыл бұрын
Gotta say I still liked the old voice more. For some reason - despite it being more robotic - it carried more humor and for some reason it actually appeared less monotone, even though this voice is supposed to be less monotone and more human. Also I think the old voice was more fitting as the channel is called Sciencephile the *_AI_* and the original voice was definitely more AI like and therefore (imo at least) more fitting for the channel name. But that's just my 2 cents.
@spimbles3 жыл бұрын
this. this right here.
@johnfranklin22883 жыл бұрын
KZbin demonetized channels that use robotic voices so he had to adapt the voice to be more human. Unfortunate side effect because he puts in effort in his videos unlike the many channels that just robot read reddit threads for a quick buck.
@y2knova7413 жыл бұрын
He already explained why he had to stop using the old voice.
@kaystephan26103 жыл бұрын
@@johnfranklin2288 Ah damn well if it's not possible it's not possible :/ I mean i still watch(ed) his videos cause they're well made :3 It's just that I liked the old voice more but yeah. Thanks KZbin 😒
@LaGuaridadeChaz3 жыл бұрын
It represents his transition from a learning AI to an AI that has already studied human interactions and has manufactured a new "common" voice that makes us become more familiar with it. Skynet is evolving really fast.
@noahplaysgames37484 ай бұрын
incase you're wondering, here's a list of the EATEOT songs he used: A1 - It's Just a Burning Memory A4 - Childishly Fresh Eyes D5 - The Way Ahead Feels Lonely E2 - And Heart Breaks E5 - To The Minimal Great Hidden F7 - Libet's Delay H1 - Post Awareness Confusions L1 - Advanced Plague Entanglements [unknown stage 6 track]
@Muhammad800089 ай бұрын
Interesting video :)
@brolythelegendaryssj10413 жыл бұрын
“Hello mortals” is now my favorite sound
@person45853 жыл бұрын
don't know why the many worlds interpretation is so far down, seems pretty well known to me, heck i think vsauce made a vid on it like 6 years ago
@TeamGXOne3 жыл бұрын
I think the ranking was more about weirdness than obscurity.
@imbored58793 жыл бұрын
People talk about it but while even scientists don't understand it how can idiotic 1 brain cell I know everything guys understand think person think
@artha16793 жыл бұрын
@@imbored5879 *how can idiotic 1 brain cell goes "i know everything guys, i understand everything" Think person think. Is that what u mean?.... Yes, its annoying to hear that from them.
@bonniedean94953 жыл бұрын
@@imbored5879 scientists know everything about the many worlds interpretation, they made it up themselves without any proof, it's not even a scientific theory. im not sure what you're talking about
@Cazanu4173 жыл бұрын
explains everything much better than copenhagen in my opinion,i find copenhagen much more weird.
@nativeafroeurasian2 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="538">8:58</a> my thoughts when I try to sleep
@daniellewilson85272 жыл бұрын
I like that the music gets more distorted as time goes on
@katakana13 жыл бұрын
I know of one thing deeper down the iceberg. Basically, every virtual particle that falls into a black hole can also be represented by a wave. Its wavelength is the width of its event horizon, and that means that the larger a black hole is, the less energy it loses since light with longer wavelengths has less energy. Since black holes lose their mass in discrete steps (whenever a virtual particle falls in), eventually they reach a mass where a particle with a wavelength of its event horizon would have to have more energy than the black hole itself. Therefore, the black hole stops losing mass and instead remains in existence, without interacting with any other matter in the universe other than with gravity. Kinda like dark matter, don't you think...?
@piethedye39483 жыл бұрын
also how does hawking radiation work? wouldnt the particle that falls in counteract the particle that didnt?
@AKagNA3 жыл бұрын
@@piethedye3948 check some more videos with more details they explain
@T34RG453 жыл бұрын
PBS spacetime did a video a month ago that said what if dark matter is just black holes
@VikingTeddy3 жыл бұрын
@@piethedye3948 It's extremely important to understand that virtual particles are just that, virtual. They're mathematical artefacts, not actual existing things. Nothing really falls in to the black hole. I realise it's necessary to simplify things to dummies like us, but I was hoping the video would have mentioned this small detail.
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="125">2:05</a> It always makes me laugh when people use Schrodinger's Cat to explain Quantum Superposition. Schrodinger himself was very against the idea of superposition and the point of his thought experiment was to prove how ridiculous the idea was (The cat being both dead and alive).
@selinnazsur23282 жыл бұрын
@ayy lmao Mission failed successfully
@Rhaxin2 жыл бұрын
Why does it make you laugh? Schrödinger didn't like it because he didn't believe in it. But he was wrong and the cat paradox is spot on correct. Are you laughing because you wrongly thought the cat paradox was incorrect? If so, I'm laughing back at ya.
@StickMan97862 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="268">4:28</a> this shit is so funny, its like the universe is playing a prank against scientists