The incredible physics behind quantum computing | Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, & more | Big Think

[@bigthink]

What question would you want to ask a quantum computing expert?

[@NitpickingNerd]

isn't there a risk that such a powerful quantum computer might become sentient ? it could also know the future and all possible outcomes and will predict and outsmart our every move

[@TheInfiniteVoid]

How much longer until we can use Quantum Computing to simulate a universe or a single planet, inhabited by life forms Ashwell as being able to alter and customize the nature of the simulated reality, then how much longer from that till we have quantum vr tech, allowing us to interact with the reality of our creation? i wanna play god for fun and curiosity, but i also believe such a simulation could be used to remake our reality then speed up time then look for aliens in the simulation than look in the same spots in reality possibly increasing the chance of finding aliens.

[@EyesOfByes]

What will it do for Ai graphics, such as Nvidias DLSS 2.0, if it can predict pretty much any potential scenario? "Anything that can happen, will happen" - Cooper

[@NitpickingNerd]

@@EyesOfByes AI graphics will become as detailed and realistic as the real world , and you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference . basically like the Matrix

[@NitpickingNerd]

@@TheInfiniteVoid if such a thing is possible and there will be millions of such simulations of the real world , then chances are that we're already inside such a simulation

[@erikwright7437]

Hopefully the quantum computer will explain to us how it works someday

[@TKMRacer28]

Underrated comment 😂😂😂

[@rameshemv]

I am glad that my knowledge about how quantum computers work, before and after watching this video hasn't changed 😂

[@yolololo6120]

Lol

[@rajjagdhane]

I have paused at 2.31 after reading ur msg.

[@mrmister9860]

why would you be glad?

[@ImAnmolThakur]

:D

[@Thewiseone124]

In short if God was a computer he would be a quantum computer

[@kinghassy334]

The intro was the best explanation I've heard about why classical computers will stagnate

[@robertd.gillman2378]

It's so unfortunate that so many haven't paid attention to the future and what it holds for us.

[@Maxmikemusic]

Fortunate for us , more money to be made

[@miklov]

This explanation was just like all other explanations I have heard. "With quantum computing you can compute something in the entire parameter space at once and it will spit out the solution". But what I have never heard explained, and that I want to know, is how is this "incredible physics" actually utilized? Are computations done using a set of gates like in classical computing? Do these gates have to be hardwired? If they can be software defined, does that mean the computer runs all possible software in conjunction with all possible data? How do you select "the right universe"? Can you only do computations that yield some sort of stable spin configuration that you sample, that is, problems with only one prominent solution? This presentation might as well have been about magic. "We will use magic to search the entire data space for this computation that have something to do with atoms wiggling in unison".

[@Jane-qh2yd]

I didn't understand Quantum computers before, now I understand them even less

[@zyyrtt951]

Because it’s bogus science. What they mean is that they have a different structure of computers that computes at a much larger level. Their objective is to form an AI, by having a quantum computer perform near every calculation possible so a conscious can spawn from the computer.

[@TimeManInJail]

He starting to believe

[@3X73RM]

”Why would we need more power?” Cyberpunk 2077: Hold my beer

Quantum computer is not used to play games stupid

[@zonzaykay]

@ oh wow, thanks Sherlock

[@Mermaider]

@@zonzaykay yah, what a bright guy he is!

[@meatsweatsland]

@ Be patient. Classical computers started purely as calculators and rn, they are used to play games. Quantum computers are actually planned to be used for real-life simulations of the universe at the fringes of the capabilities we know about them. That would make absolute VR gaming. You know games are just insanely complex hyper-multivariable calculations.

[@meatsweatsland]

In short, a quantum computer would insanely reduce the time for solution-cascade in games reducing lags and increasing fluidity and latency of games.

[@janhemmer8181]

If a quantum computer can do calculations that no man can do and would take a classical computer millions of years to achieve, my question is: How can we know if the answer is correct?

[@stephenloukin9915]

Wow, great straight-forward explanations describing what can be explained w/o resorting to undefined parameters used in other explanations on this subject. Great job and thank you.

[@corriban]

I don't know when we as regular consumers will be able to buy quantum computers, but I know we will probably buy them off scalpers on ebay.

[@thefreshest2379]

Imagine AI run on a quantum computer

[@erikwright7437]

Enter. Ultron

[@jacobpeel93]

Quantum AI is already a thing.

[@Wingedmagician]

Ultron is lame. Enter God.

[@PureOrganic]

@@Wingedmagician It will surpass us in terms of computational power, but it was created by us.

[@MikeRodriguez98]

If it’s that smart it will give itself consciousness and hopefully it likes humans or rip

[@epiceducation867]

I'm a teen and to me this is so cool as I may be able contribute to this revolution in technology, kind of gives me hope for us to reach that stereotypical future that we all imagine🥳

[@Darth_Uchiha47]

Quantum computing base. This base is a fully operational quantum computer that can be run by a traditional computer. Whatever calculation that is input from the understanding of a human could in theory be told to a computer to input instead. So my google search could be sent to the traditional computer via internet to be input into the quantum computer. The computer analizes the results produced by the calculation that was input into the quantum computer and sends me the information back through the internet. If the quantum computer is able to do many calculations at once everyone could use it at the same time. Smaller machine to operate a larger machine.

[@dottedrhino]

Just the same mumbojumbo you always hear about QC. Do I know something more about QC now?

[@chrissonofpear1384]

Look up superpositions, non demolitional measurements, and amplitudes. Plus qubits, @R vLn .

[@topotheleague]

Electron spin has nothing to do with electrons actually spinning! Krauss!

[@First-Last-108]

“Can’t go under 5nm.” IBM announced 2nm yesterday.

[@AAvfx]

From one video to another, I have hard time to understand the concept of quantum computing. China says it's a light based computing, as U.S experiments says it's a parallel processing. Some explanations are theoretical, taking the double-slits experience as a source of information, others talk about quantum physics, but lack the interpretation to the real world. I'm left wondering... 😳

[@ooseven4696]

try the kurzgezagt video on quantum computers, also veritasium made a great explanation, I get what you're saying, a lot of people are giving out really abstract information and maybe the best way is to look up those videos and then trying to figure out the scientific papers by distinguished universities explaining the topic at a much lower level.

[@iyziejane]

Computing is an abstract model. You can make classical computers out of transistors or vacuum tubes, but you can also make them out of mechanical gears or fluids like air and water. Quantum computers are similar in that you can make them out of many things - light, atoms, superconducting wires on a microchip, and more. The key difference is that the components behave according to the laws of quantum mechanics.

[@Comedronewithme]

It's like multiplying the worlds biggest fastest computer bye a billion times.

[@ateyaba7253]

@@iyziejane This is a pretty good explanation, at least for me. I don’t fully get how they work but something clicked in my head. Thanks.

[@concinnity9676]

At 10:13, you said that outer space is 150 times warmer than your target environment. I think that interstellar space is around 2.7 Kelvins. (ref: Wikipedia). Your environment is 18 milliKelvins?

[@nv3981]

What if different realities happen between realities, time is relative and our perception of it, and aren't quantum particulars based on probability? Who knows how many possibilities and therefore realities happened between me starting writing this comment and me finishing it

[@neil659]

An infinite amount

[@concinnity9676]

At 9:16, you said "zero degrees Kelvin". Sir, I must quibble. The Kelvin scale is the only scale that does not use "degrees". Molecular Nitrogen freezes at 63 Kelvin. No "degrees". The scale is absolute. In deference to Lord Kelvin, please get it right.

[@royhsieh4307]

scientists: the classical computers have their limits. also scientists: introducing a processor that can say no or maybe as an alternative to following your instructions

[@juhliousu5491]

Hey Krauss.... You just explained the mystery of consciousness...

[@theklaus7436]

As far as I know, the regular pc is still ahead unless you made a certain quantum questions to a quantum computer. I know it is predicated to be so much better! But I think we still are taking around 20 years before they are up there

[@starquake8034]

Quantum computers are immense in size. 20 years is a good prediction for when they become more efficient to produce and keep cool without a nuclear powerplant!

[@bryangarcia81]

Absolutely

[@DeepFrydTurd]

The best video I've seen so far it's up there with Intels Quantum Computing architecture all access

[@mike814031]

How do the quantum computers Actually do the computations?

[@joedasilva134]

Any new development in programming these computers? That had also been a challenge .

[@zyyrtt951]

Nope. No new developments, just some encoding and decoding software created. But they have never reached their goal and they never will because the theory is flawed.

[@lo-fihip-hopchill8240]

relaxing sounds from nature for you

[@chickensandw1tch]

3:33 🤯🤯🤩🤩😍😍👽🙌🏻 8:00 wow! quantum weirdness! ✨🙌🏻 9:00 woah

[@darimshamsi2329]

I like Prof.Brian Greene's "If you will"

[@realitynowassigned]

Dudes got endless ego

[@joesephklansy3596]

Bruv is really talking about a multiverse theory and computers in the same sentence

[@qb4465]

I can relate. 😆 everything needs to stop disturbing me so i can vibrate In unison and work on problems. 🐒

[@so-much-to-learn]

Same here.

[@dastuff7136]

Nothing stops it unless you do.

[@sanjarcode]

Great work, clear and unambiguous. I understood everything in the video. Thanks for priming me for QC.

[@timothyzelasko]

This is only three years ago. He's been ageing rapidly.

[@umblnc]

LAWRENCE KRAUSS: "But before we did the measurement, it was spinning this way and this way and that way and that way all at the same time." How do you know, if you didn't measure it?

[@joehartman87]

We know because of Bell's Inequality.

[@umblnc]

@@joehartman87 How could the Bell's inequality experiment designed to study quantum entanglement prove quantum superposition? How could any experiment prove quantum superposition? By definition, to prove something, you have to measure it. We still don't know what was happening before measurement. And even when measuring, we don't measure the particle being in all the places at the same time because "wave function collapse occurs" on measurement. It is like saying that I am in all rooms at the same time during the sleep, but if anyone looks to find me in the house, my wave function collapses and I am in the bed.

[@Skankhunt420.]

@@umblnc does that double split experiment not prove it?

[@umblnc]

@@Skankhunt420. There are many interpretations of the Double-slit experiment. The Copenhagen Interpretation, Many-Worlds Interpretation, Ensemble Interpretation, de Broglie-Bohm interpretation... I think that number of different interpratations just shows how limited our knowledge is.

[@Skankhunt420.]

@@umblnc ok all good. But we're making new space craft and self driving cars and on the brink of AI and quantum computers. Out of billions of variations of life that's existed none could even make a bow n arrow. Our knowledge is definitely not limited

[@wildwest1832]

I dont know if quantum computing is the real replacement for silicon computers, and I still think classical computers we used the last 50 years can solve any type of problem with enough time

[@Mrclingerful]

I have yet to hear about the 1 nm = 20 atom chip I know apple is doing “5nm +” but not quite what mich is saying.

[@StudyWaliClass]

great question wonderful bro

[@abiodunolajide37]

I can't stop wondering what multiplier effect QC will have on this fast growing AI technology.....Infact that will take us to a level that will be hard to keep up with. I do hope that all these will make life a better place to live.

[@techsinc]

A question for the theoretical physicist: When does a particle (anything really) behave non-quantum-mechanically? It's always acting quantum-mechanically as long as the theory of quantum mechanics is the theroy that correctly describes the world. The point is, decoherence is a quantum mechanical process and incoherent system remains quantum mechanical (just incoherent), so to say that to get rid of decoherence (i.e. isolate) is to make the system quantum mechanical sounds incorrect.

[@FUTURE-sv3ur]

Thank you professor now I am broken than before.

[@nateham9493]

Would quantum computing make encryption obsolete?

[@sagittariusa2008]

Yet plants and birds utilize quantum effects at normal temperatures to convert energy and navigate, respectively.

[@richardcheng7622]

Same for human nose!

[@sagittariusa2008]

@@richardcheng7622 Thanks, was late and couldn't recall the third one.

[@rigohurtado1458]

This ability has potential

[@Sychonut]

Pentium chip? What year is this?

[@42maneatingplants14]

He is and old man

[@elmirelmir842]

Lawrence Krauss is only the person who explained the quantum computing to me.

[@elmo2you]

Lawrence: " .. so that during the calculation, many calculations are being performed at the same time .." [correct] " .. and only making a measurement at the end of a calculation .." (???) To me that does imply that the "calculation" has to be composed of a series of consecutive calculations, for which the "final" calculation will need result(s) of those many (simultaneous) calculations before it .. which you in term can only get from observation/measurement, in which they collapse into a single result (any of the superimposed ones). Why do I get a feeling that something just doesn't logically add up there? More in general: I have only a basic understanding of quantum mechanics (it was a part of my university studies), but enough for the science of quantum mechanics itself to make sense. However, whenever I hear anyone talk about quantum computers and gets down to the details, the explanation always appears to fall apart somewhere. I guess it will no doubt easily bamboozle many, if they can't follow what is actually being said .. However, I sincerely would like to have an explanation of quantum computers that actually does make sense. So far, no luck. I wonder why.

[@senpaitm8742]

How can you find "an answer" if there is so many realities with different variables?

[@joshuacook2]

Yeah! This is what makes quantum computers only able to answer a few "very specific" problems. The key is interference. How they explained it, it would sound like the quantum computers make many realities, and what, at the end, which do you get? Is it random? You actually can't get more power with that. The distinction is that the different states aren't actually probabilities, but "amplitudes" that have positive or negative signs. If you line up the computation so different paths make a negative and a positive amplitude on the same state, they will interfere and cancel out. This means this state will never be observed in the output. So your computation is kind of like waves in water, and you want to make the waves happen in such a way that where the waves are big at the end is the answer. So if your problem has this structure that let's bad answers interfere and cancel each other out, quantum computers give a huge speed up, because it can run the algorithm an exponential number of times in parallel and bad answers anhilate!

[@chrissonofpear1384]

@@joshuacook2 Yes - and are these amplitudes, also, in some way, contained lightcones?

[@johnm.515]

Step one...all possible outcomes instantly provided in one output. Right Wrong Indifferent or in Error. Next steps...algorithms that can sort eliminate and reduce the indifferent or in error. More next steps...secondary level of algorithms to sort the sort. Clear as mud.

[@umblnc]

Imagine a scientist long long time ago, claiming that the coin that you toss in the air is not actually spinning. Instead, it has heads and tails showing on both sides until we catch it and look at it. The math would work perfectly, chances are 50-50 for heads and tails if you try it many times. And the claim can't be disproved, because as soon as you try, the coin surface collapses to heads or tails. Very smart. But does that prove that reality is following the mathematical model that works so far?

[@lazaryanya9407]

You got it!

[@NathanOkun]

Neural networks with QCs at many or even all of the nodes, stitched together with enhanced parallel-processing standard computers: "Ultra" computers.

[@royhsieh4307]

bitcoin miner in quantum age: look, i found a bit coin!!! blockchain: yes, but also no.

[@diorynovis]

I just want to play minecraft and roblox using quantum computer.

[@cpyne4542]

Incredible BRIAN GREEN.

[@NitpickingNerd]

wouldn't such a powerful quantum computer become sentient ? it would also know the future and all possible outcomes and will predict and outsmart our every move

[@Zyanaster]

Not that simple lol

[@NitpickingNerd]

@@Zyanaster if a single chip would be so powerful that it can do trillions of computations due to quantum mechanics , then imagine a network of such chips all working together . imagine millions of such chips working together . they would easily become smarter than a human brain

[@jbergquist0309]

Not if you feed it the wrong information

[@NitpickingNerd]

@@jbergquist0309 if it has access to all possible timelines , it will know ALL the information that it is possible to know

[@jbergquist0309]

@@NitpickingNerd 🙄 Time is an illusion, it's the clock that helps you find your way - and that's cheating. Lol. Talk to Elon Musk. Lol

[@lazybone8584]

my friends have so much abilities in playing games... game can be infinite too... like organization

[@chrisromoser4341]

this has gotten so interesting

[@MRCroosingTootH]

Good video. Cause when alot of People explain 1 thing u get alot of explanations and u pick and chose what made most sens to you. And they all touched on different topics too so very interesting but also i got The idea that this is very very far away? Like 15-20 years?

[@MarttiSuomivuori]

People seem to know so much about ones and zeros and spins Kelvins but can somebody actually perform useful quantum computations to do something?

[@philipenergycorp8816]

*Big Think* Sincerely yours.

[@SSJ0016]

Brian Greene with the save. That first guy said nothing.

[@jbrand4989]

You should, um, study up on "that first guy."

[@SSJ0016]

@@jbrand4989 One of the guys. Not Michio Kaku, the other guy after him. I'm sure he's smart, just, didn't really get much from what he said. "Quantum computing is very...quantum, and cool" is how I took it.

[@beautifullife5645]

Thank you

[@martinbonner6329]

Moore's law is coming to an end? Maybe with Silicone, but what about Graphene Michio? Surely it's potential is only just begun..or am I missing something?

[@zyyrtt951]

He’s saying that at some point there is a Moore’s law of transistor density that will limit the way we make microchips. The next step is nanotechnology because then you are programming and designing molecules to act in a certain way under certain conditions. That’s what quantum computing is supposed to allow them to do, manipulate the molecular, atomic, “quantum” realm.

[@paulwatson9799]

Maybe when particles are not interacting they are in a state of thought and that has something to do with free will

[@calebhaines3794]

So Applied Quantum will be used for holograms, EPA and Spaceships. Whereas quantum theory will be directed towards complex theoretical "connections".

[@lazybone8584]

so There still so many things that we need to find out... why war? corp? cant be game or sports?

[@mohamadnassr9388]

Imagine what AI is capable of in a quantum computer we would make a god

[@alejandroungaro4488]

And a perfect simulated pornstars Harem!!! JAJAAAAAAA!!! Silicon Valley's Delight Garden.

[@mohamadnassr9388]

@@alejandroungaro4488 LOL

[@evangelistajohnfrancis5704]

This is The Future

[@DisasterxUs]

Moore's Law is about transistor density, not about computing power. Come on

[@mindsed9959]

Quantum mechanics sometimes sounds like astrology: 'you can be anything at the same time' And I love it.

[@n8sfolly]

A better analogy would be that you are all things at the same time until you make a choice and then you are what you've chosen.

[@mindsed9959]

@@n8sfolly I agree. I was just joking before hahaha

[@n8sfolly]

@@mindsed9959 Don't get me wrong I'm onboard with integrating astrology with science whenever and wherever possible. I'm just pessimistic because I'm a Cancer.

[@mindsed9959]

@@n8sfolly LMFAO!!

[@chrissonofpear1384]

@@mindsed9959 all things within the realm of overlapping amplitudes, anyway - that generally exist only at the microscopic, electron orbital level.

[@jefffarmer5785]

Very interesting... My question is could Quantum Capabilities somehow be applied to electricity/energy generation and/or production-??? 🤔😄😆👍✌

[@MagnumCarta]

Perhaps to answering questions about generating or storing power but not in terms of generating power itself. There is work being done in figuring out better ways of generating power and attempts at nuclear fusion. One example that is currently being built and expected to complete construction by 2025 is ITER.

[@jefffarmer5785]

Thanks VERY MUCH for your input, John-!!! What bothers me about Nuc Power is they haven't came up w/a way to recycle and/or RE-ENERGIZE them (fuel rods, I meant); in order to be re-used...?? Fusion and Fission is just over my head and I'm just scared of ANYTHING Radioactive b/c to much exposure to it, I believe can have adverse health effects on humans and animals...?? 🤔😞✌

[@MagnumCarta]

​@@jefffarmer5785 You're welcome, Jeff. The reason why nuclear fusion is sought over and nuclear fission is considered bad is that nuclear fusion actually does not cause radiation (or rather, very low amounts of radiation). To explain, there's an issue with the word 'nuclear'. There are two fundamental forces of the universe that are both called 'nuclear'. One is the 'strong' nuclear force that holds the nucleus (protons + neutrons) together and the other is the 'weak' nuclear force which is the type of nuclear energy that can cause radiation. The act of applying a VERY large explosive charge around a 'fissile material' such as Uranium-235 causes a large field of small, energy-charged particles to pollute an area. I don't want to complicate this too much for you but to sum it up simply, nuclear fusion occurs when two atoms cause their nuclei (plural of nucleus) to collide directly. Imagine the nucleus for a second as a train and these are two trains heading towards each other. If they have a head-on collision, it causes nuclear fusion to undergo (literally the two nuclei fusing into one, new, larger nucleus) but if they were off by even a couple of degrees, they'll be flung off in opposite directions. The 'opposite directions' are what sustain the Sun and allow it to not collapse in on its own gravity. When nuclear fusion occurs between Hydrogen atoms, they are transformed into Helium (the second lightest element). If we look at the periodic table, Hydrogen and Helium are at opposite sides. This is to imply that Helium is a very 'stable' atom (it both does not want to give up its electrons nor take any new electrons). This stability leads to no long-lasting radiation compared to nuclear fission. Think of radiation as caused by a large environment of free sub-atomic particles. Electrons, protons, and neutrons all want to be 'glued' together but only in certain amounts to be 'stable'. The number of protons tells us the element, the number of neutrons tells us the 'isotope' (e.g. U-235 has 235 neutrons), and the number of electrons tells us the 'charge' of the particle. Things at the right-most side of the periodic table are called 'noble gases' and they do not form ions (charged particles), so they do not cause nuclear radiation. As the elements collide and fuse into heavier elements, a bit of their mass is transformed into energy which is the energy output we get. But basically nuclear fusion is the best form of 'clean' energy we could ever produce however it is incredibly hard to perform without the gravity of a star. Solutions like Tokamaks (which ITER is an example of) use strong magnetic fields spinning around a shielded environment to create the pressure the gravity would cause.

[@jefffarmer5785]

@@MagnumCarta , Wow, Now THAT (IS) interesting, John-!!! CLEAN ENERGY-!!!!!!! TWO THUMBS UP-!!! When I think of magnativity, it reminds me of what is 'called' perpetual motion devices...??? Which makes me wonder how that (perpetual motion) using magnets; (and- the possibility of using some wheels to add back energy into the battery (energy storage device, or whatever) on electric vehicles)...??? Then, it makes me wonder what the possibilities may be to use magnetivity to induce gravity on a place that has no gravity (like on another planet)-?? 😁😆✌👍

[@jefffarmer5785]

And, the possibility of perpetual motion and magnets to produce electricity (efficiently)...?? 🤔😆👍

[@weekendresearcher]

Calculus of probabilities.

[@erkanturan7215]

Amazing!

[@rigohurtado1458]

Amazing

[@Ascensionadventures]

Sounds like homeostasis tbh. They’re in our present universe, doing all these movements at once and they do this in harmony

[@plotwist1066]

can you build quantum computer using classical computer?

[@kristopherleslie8343]

Yes in simulation

[@jarikosonen4079]

The classical computers really are overheating already in current designs at 14nm-22nm. And CPU can not run at maximum specified clock rates. Not sure what they can do about it, but it still going towards 3-5nm and even below. It looks like no doubt quantum technologies could be needed for further developments. Also maybe quantum sensors could be useful and not sure like if they really can see "behind the corner" and if that "corner" can be set inside the human body also in medical imaging.

[@im415again]

Type II civilization begins

[@cameleon5724]

One content, two languages. What I have now written may have a perfect mirror in another language.!!!!!!!!!!!

[@pacajalbert9018]

Mňa zaujíma ako som sa mohol byť na oby dvoch stranách vesmíru

[@stucknote]

Somehow I understood KFC super hot console better than quantum computing, despite watching as many quantum computer explanation as I can, including this.

[@braedynryan2974]

“Zero DEGREES kelvin”

[@adelinrapcore]

Meanwhile there was a breakthrough, quantum computing at the room temperature..

[@goldenwarrior1186]

^

[@trentmcmanus9423]

>degrees Kelvin

[@musicman3rdclass176]

I just wanna get the hell out of this reality and create my own reality in personal quantum computer.

[@abdicolestudios8899]

After 1000s of years enjoying that reality, would you choose to forget you created it?

[@musicman3rdclass176]

@@abdicolestudios8899 I think by that time it will be boring,so yes

[@abdicolestudios8899]

@@musicman3rdclass176 interesting... I forgot what I was gonna say

[@khaledahmed9027]

الانسانيه مازالت في البدايات أو اولى خطوات طفل رضيع . هناك صاروخ صيني ضائع في الفضاء و ليس هناك من يعلم عن وضعه شيئًا او حتي زمن هبوط ذلك الصريخ الا الخالق عز وجل الله رب العالمين. لو ان الانسانيه طورت هذا النوع من كمبيوترات ( الكم ) لكانت حلت مثل هذه المشاكل و غيرها من المشاكل كفيروس كرونا مثلاً ...

[@tma5239]

I have his book, Physics of the Future

[@roberttorell4308]

Isnt this how we pick up on ai R4MT start up system

[@tma5239]

Kaku and Krauss were the most explicit.

[@burhanmushtaq7597]

Enlighten me which problems are they talking about🤔🤔

[@NitpickingNerd]

understanding women

[@warrior0058]

@@NitpickingNerd haa

[@Fiatluc]

This won’t come on your homes kids, it’s just too impractical. This caliber is for cloud computing systems.

[@tanphan3395]

when the units sell out market ?

[@scottbernard8824]

"640 KB of RAM ought to be enough for anybody" -- Bill Gates in 1981, although he now denies saying it.

[@lovekush9103]

My Pentium 1 PC had 16 MB Ram in 1999 My Pentium 4 PC had 512 MB Ram in 2004 My Core 2 Duo PC had 2 GB Ram in 2008 My i3 PC had 16 GB Ram in 2015 My i5 PC had 64 GB Ram in 2020

[@ciscobriano]

Some one please show me videos that Are Good Videos about quantum computing

[@hikerstl]

Am I right that the Apple silicon chip, the M1, has solved some of the heat and leakage problems for now? Apple chips are blowing out the Intel chips of similar vintage.

[@CheckmateStallioN]

How versed does one have to be in Quantum Physics to go into the Quantum Computing programming field? Besides C++ and Q# what other languages would be used? Would a basic understanding of Quantum Mechanics be enough or would you have to get a University degree in advanced Quantum Physics?

[@shohanahmedniloy9178]

Python and Q#

[@j5255]

Great physics lesson, but would it not take an almost infinite amount of programming to produce an almost infinite amount logical computations?

[@michaelwalters4749]

There is no "almost infinite" there is either finite or infinite. So if there were a finite amount of calculations to perform, the software could be as small as a couple lines of code especially if the calculations we would perform were algorithmic in nature. If each calculation is in need of new formulas everytime, then maybe you're correct but generally there is an algorithm out there.

[@MuhammadRizwan-sm5bx]

Sir, if we use the positron gun in Double slit experiments Because, we can understand easily double slit experiments Right?

[@mike814031]

8:02 Why do you need them moving in unison? Can you be a little more specific about losing the coherence?

[@BboyKeny]

So if the tree falls down in the woods and no one observes it, then the tree makes and doesn't make sound at the same time?

[@loconaruto]

The tree falls and doesn't fall. Bends, dances, lights itself in flames and talks to other trees at the same time. You are the tree and you aren't. The tree is the universe and the universe is the tree.

[@johnkennedy4023]

@@loconaruto Hey! I was going to say that...

[@cartier2312]

“What’s The Problem” - Michio Kaku

[@5pellcast3r]

Can we study this academically yet though ??

[@jishanali3714]

Yeah... We already had a basic course in MSc... It was QUANTUM INFORMATION & COMPUTATION...