The Indefinability of Truth (Tarski's Theorem)

  Рет қаралды 18,437

Carneades.org

Carneades.org

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 18
@liammcooper
@liammcooper 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent work. I think it's pretty simple to comprehend, the statement says there's a number that's not true (p) that can be arithmatized as n, and then also says there's a function that gives you p if you plug in something for m. Which would mean that it's true, but the statement says it's not true, hence you're proving something untrue is true, which is a contradiction.
@LonleyBoy1105
@LonleyBoy1105 8 жыл бұрын
One question: I think I watched all the videos on Tarski, but I never ran into the so called "diagonalization lemma", which in other sources I used to understand Tarski and Godel, this lemma was always mentioned. It serves as a stepping stone to prove their theorems. It enables self-reference within a system, I presume. So, am i wrong or you did include it in another video?
@CarneadesOfCyrene
@CarneadesOfCyrene 8 жыл бұрын
I do not have a particular video explaining the diagonalization lemma. Basically it is a proof that self referential statements exist in all languages that do some basic arithmetic. For more on diagonalization itself, check out my video on Cantor: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXrVlayrbrykq7M One day I'll do one explaining how these two connect, but not yet.
@Nicoder6884
@Nicoder6884 2 жыл бұрын
7:00 Hold on, plugging that big number into (∃n)(~T(n) & Q(m,n)) will give you (∃n)(~T(n) & Q([big number],n)), which is the original statement. However, that still contains the number and therefore leads to an infinite regress.
@CarlosLlosa1
@CarlosLlosa1 8 жыл бұрын
Wait, this is how godel proved the incompleteness theorem, right? How is Tarky's proof different?
@CarneadesOfCyrene
@CarneadesOfCyrene 8 жыл бұрын
This is very similar, Tarski is talking about Truth predicates, while Godel is talking about completeness and incompleteness, but the process is very similar.
@fluxpistol3608
@fluxpistol3608 6 жыл бұрын
So they could have been any arbitrary symbols right? And not arbitrary numbers?
@yahavitah2791
@yahavitah2791 2 жыл бұрын
Ok but who says its the only way out of this paradox
@rafaelo6198
@rafaelo6198 Жыл бұрын
nice work
@alexandros6433
@alexandros6433 2 жыл бұрын
Why do you pronounce gödel as grdel?
@CarneadesOfCyrene
@CarneadesOfCyrene 2 жыл бұрын
I am famously bad at pronouncing names, My video on Peano Arithmetic is a testament to this issue.
@BelegaerTheGreat
@BelegaerTheGreat 10 ай бұрын
Idk what he does here, probably an equivalent of the Fixed Point Lemma. But he does it in an annoying way.
@ahmedmahmud4238
@ahmedmahmud4238 5 ай бұрын
Honestly your channel's presentation delivery needs help.
What is Peano Arithmetic?
45:14
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Axiomatic Theories of Truth (Typed Theories)
35:49
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 4,8 М.
人是不能做到吗?#火影忍者 #家人  #佐助
00:20
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
So Cute 🥰 who is better?
00:15
dednahype
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
The Banach-Tarski Paradox
24:14
Vsauce
Рет қаралды 45 МЛН
Alfred Tarski and the Liar's Paradox
25:16
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Truthmakers and Truthbearers
40:02
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Tarski's Semantic Theory of Truth
43:17
Kane B
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Gödel's Incompleteness (extra footage 1) - Numberphile
13:24
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 373 М.
The Deflationary Theory of Truth
45:21
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 14 М.
The Banach Tarski Paradox: A Visual Proof
20:48
Teun van Wezel
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Saul Kripke's Theory of Truth (Semantic Type-Free)
25:14
Carneades.org
Рет қаралды 7 М.
The Gödel incompleteness phenomenon
1:19:48
Joel David Hamkins
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Why complete chaos is impossible || Ramsey Theory
23:00
Dr. Trefor Bazett
Рет қаралды 49 М.