The Longest Union Pacific Train - 1/10/10

[@Millenniumforce]

Beautiful The mother of all trains. Wish I could have been there.

[@oro5103]

Same here! I am at NC A huge lover of the NC transportation museum, about to start volunteering there I'm about 12 so that when I can start. When I go there, the museum was originally built along a main line for testing/building/repairing engines. So Norfolk southern which I want to be an engineer for when I can apply a job to start schooling for driving a train, I always go down the road, a mile away to the nearest crossing, about every 30 minutes there comes a train, if not usually 1 to 2 hours, I always like rail-fanning down there. It's my biggest passion I have, I have a whole big set in one of the rooms in my house. And we re plain rebuilding it in a few months.

[@oro5103]

Same here! I am at NC A huge lover of the NC transportation museum, about to start volunteering there I'm about 12 so that when I can start. When I go there, the museum was originally built along a main line for testing/building/repairing engines. So Norfolk southern which I want to be an engineer for when I can apply a job to start schooling for driving a train, I always go down the road, a mile away to the nearest crossing, about every 30 minutes there comes a train, if not usually 1 to 2 hours, I always like rail-fanning down there. It's my biggest passion I have, I have a whole big set in one of the rooms in my house. And we re plain rebuilding it in a few months.

[@bobafett8495]

Millenniumforce Hey MillenniumForce, love ur vids

[@F-14DSuperTomcat]

Congrats on play button again (I rlly need subs,Help a railfan out)

[@railfanmaximstill7279]

I HAVE NEVER SEEN A TRAIN THIS LONG

[@vtalex0330]

Union Pacific, United States. Run from 8 to 10 January 2010, consisting of 296 container wagons and hauled by nine diesel-electric locomotive spread through the train with a total length of 18,000 feet (3.4 mi; 5.5 km), from a terminal in Texas to Los Angeles. Around 618 double-stacked containers were carried at speeds up to 70 mph/112 km/h. 14,059 t.[19][20] BNSF, United States, 2010-3.03 km [21]

[@AtsfMike559]

This reminds me of the videos I have seen where Conrail used to move massive coal trains across Pennsylvania. Never thought I would see this here in California. Looks like they took four regular length trains, ran them together, made the air hose connections, got the "highball" and went for it. Great video. Thanks for posting this one. Mike in Fresno, Ca.

[@jashmedia6935]

Imagine having to wait while in ur car at a crossover

[@kevinashwill564]

Jash Media and you have to pee

[@packisbetter90]

at least this train is moving fast. In my hometown theres a monster train yard with tons of trains coming in slowing way down or at times stopped on the crossing. It's the worst or was the worst. They finally made a bridge a year ago

[@luciahelena3519]

Pls can this comment reach 45 likes :)

[@briank10101]

What's funny though is the typical train near where I live is often half this length with 100 cars being the lower end.

[@RileyGoss]

They had engines in the middle of the train dude. that's how serious this shit is.

[@DKW1975]

296 cars and 9 locomotives 8 men crewing the train and roughly 592 tractor trailers worth of freight off of the interstates.... I bet you the teamsters are really happy about that :D By the way that was cool!! I wonder if any one that was at the grade crossing had a photo finish after having to sit there for over 4 min.

[@alexiedaledelrosario]

Under 4 minutes 9 locomotive 296 cars 8 men

[@markjolyn94]

That was awesome. I have been around for over half a century and a train fan since I was very young,and that is one of the longest trains I've ever seen. Thank you

[@falconoilcompany]

Very impressive. It looks like four trains hitched together to me, but for all, that it was quite a show, very lucky man, right place right time, right technique. Thanks very much

[@nicholaswhitfield9341]

This train is VERY long... but actually lighter than even a 110 car coal train, which weigh roughly 16,000 tons. Whereas this train was ~15,000 tons I believe. Intermodal trains are some of the lightest trains there are... I guess only roadrailers are lighter, since the trailers they carry aren't even on cars at all. So yeah, 9 locomotives weren't really necessary from a power perspective... hell on my subdivision, 16,000 ton coal trains can be moved by 2 modern diesels alone! Of course there's other factors. If you have 2 trains, one long and one short, that both weigh the same, then of course the long one will need more power to pull due to friction and drag and whatnot. Also with a train this long you'd never be able to move it with only locomotives on the head because you'd never be able to pump up the brake pipe to an adequate pressure all the way to the rear. The helpers are there to pump air and keep the slack manageable more than anything.

[@harrychavez6038]

No thank

[@nawhitfi]

phillyslasher Oh don't get me wrong the grades on my sub are relatively light and even the steepest section is only uphill in the direction you're going with empties as far as grain/coal goes. I'm just saying that intermodal trains are VERY light for their length compared to unit trains like grain and coal. So even at 15,000 tons this train, at like 3 or 4x longer than your average coal train, needs the extra units probably more for slack/air reasons that actual motive power.

[@deividimunhoz4242]

Here in Brazil we call these compositions "distributed" but because of the conditions but the railways are in 130 wagons with a maximum of 6 locomotives and the speed is only 50km / h. This distributed American and monstrous. Congratulations to the Americans!

[@WTBrianIII]

I got to see this live and up close...in the first car in line waiting at a crossing in Riverside, Ca. The train had to slow down there for a curve, I believe the limit is 35 for freight on that curve, and they were working on a couple of grade separation bridges in that area at that time as well, so it could have been even slower yet. I didn't think I was ever going to see the end of it, just a couple more engines, and more train...

[@Boss302fan]

I work in Long Beach. You better believe planning went into this. This wasn't a pile of garbage. This was an incredible amount of revenue freight that is moving for customers. The industry is trying to come up with new ways to meet the ever increasing pressure put on railroads by truckers. Not everything tried will work. Fortunately management on BNSF and UP are trying new approaches. Beats sitting still and watching independents drive off with our business.

[@marnatmat]

Hi Matthew, I work for U.P.S. and in the past we would see many more ups trailers on the trains, however the railroad is no longer able to meet the time constraints of our company, so now we are trucking stuff across the country. We can go from L.A. C.A. to N.Y. in 3 days where as A.T.S.F.R. is taking 4 to 5 days.

[@RickyGMedia_TX]

Insane sight of heavy trains long before PSR is common.

[@kelbym07]

This would tick impatient drivers off for sure. Awesome awesome awesome

[@penguingeneral2]

I have never gotten so excited over a stack train before.

[@kennethklapel5176]

I like to see more long trains like this. I am used to seeing them on the Southern Pacific in Tucson, when SP ran before UP took over.

[@hirisk761]

great video! read about this train and the local gov's were pissed because UP didnt inform them of this test train

[@Atlantique325]

Greetings from Brazil!!!! This is a pure LOCOTROL concept!! We have a kind of Locotrol trains here, the only company who compares to this UP Train is the VALE. Great train!!!

[@Xomanowar99]

I like train. I grew up in neighborhood surrounded by rail yards. Trains are cool.

[@HyperActive7]

It's basically three long trains in one which adds up to about 200 cars. The way they balanced the power out for that train was well thought out and the right way to split the duty for a train that big. The axle count was most likely near the 1000 axle mark or more, Everything is bigger from Texas so there :p

[@EMDFAN1988]

The slack on that train must be hell to control! Great catch man.

[@deloreanman14]

@charlieb640 - According to Wikipedia (grain of salt), the tractive effort of a Big Boy was 135,375 pound feet. I don't think it would be unrealistic given that the Challenger has a TE of 97,350 pound feet and pulled a 143-car intermodal double-stack back in the early 90s; it didn't even break a sweat. No doubt the operating costs would have been astronomical...I wasn't being serious when I typed that. Despite it being a fantasy, you can't deny it would look amazing seeing a Big Boy pull that.

[@calvinclabiorne7328]

this is the mackdaddy of all freight train intermodal consists!!!, nice job!!!!

[@bkriegel95]

A total of nine engines?! Holy horsepower! And I've never seen engines embedded in the train like that.

[@railfanmaximstill7279]

3 leading 4 in the middle 2 at the back.

[@dboatube]

We got 295 also. That was a very long double stack. Doing a good track speed to pass by in under 5 mins. good catch!

[@Metalchick721]

296 welds 108 cars 9 engines 854 axles 46 five piece 3 3 piece 59 1 piece ( singles )

[@thedreamliner2012]

I counted 296 cars and nine locos. 620 double stacked containers. By my calculations, it's around 3.5 miles, give or take. Also, by using that sign as a reference, and the time between cars, I estimate it was traveling at 60 mph. All these numbers are close but it's hard to make perfect claculations from just one viewpoint.

[@DaaYay]

Not only that, the weight of a stack train is basically the containers themselves not the actual train (the well cars). The well cars are pretty much hollow shells with wheels. Their is little to no slack do to the articulation between so many cars and the lighter weight compared to other cars/loads. This type of train is ideal for this type of test, not to mention that these containers need to be moving at all times.

[@LeggerKen]

Cool Clip. I read an LA Times article saying this had 9-locomotives, I saw the 3 in the front 2-middle and 2-end, the article also said it was 9-football fields long....Again....Thanks for the Post!! Awesome!!!

[@Boss302fan]

You guys run some bad ass trains in Brazil....and you are getting better at it. Dramatic improvements and it's good to see the investment Brazil is making in this mode of transportation. Brazil is going to be a world power in far less time than many people think. Be safe.

[@gamingwithlukeJToH]

Uhh, but that's US... not Brazil!

[@riteonfukenkaren]

That pissed off driver at the end was a nice touch. They're trying to figure out ways to beat the deep draft container ships after the upcoming Panama Canal expansion. The computers are built to handle 7 remote consists, and the company is pouring money into new track, so get ready to see this a lot.

[@cuznvinnie818]

I counted 9 locomotives, 295 cars and just over 600 containers. Each train had at least 95 cars in the set between locomotives. That is one long train! That's a lot of trucks off the road with those 600+ containers on the rails.

[@tnbk97]

There was only one crew on that train, possibly one on the helper on the rear. The mid train units were being operated by the engineer on the lead locomotive. Its called distributive power...and the BLET (locomotive engineers union) is part of the Teamsters, so they don't care.

[@Boss302fan]

two crew members on the head end.

[@arbitelli]

IMPRESSIVE!!! CONGRATULATION!!! THE BIGGEST TRAIN!!!!

[@buffaloditka]

I like this. And in addition to having displaced locomotives pulling/pushing the train while in motion, it also helps coming to rest. Controlled consistent action.

[@weihuashi7069]

Very good video! Thanks for sharing. FYI, last year Feb, China finished the test using 4 electrical locomotive engines to drive 320 wagons loaded with 30,000 tons of coal, about 4000 meters long. Usually in some western parts of China they are using 4 engines to drive 204 wagons to transport about 20000 tons of coal, total length is 2600 meters.

[@AmtrakSilverStar]

Jesus Christ! 3 engines + 99 platforms + 2 engines + 98 platforms + 2 engines + 98 platforms + 2 engines. = 295 total platforms and 9 engines. Cool video!

[@fatherdaughtergaming]

I've heard BNSF and CP do something similiar on higher priority manifests going on the Transcon, they will place loaded cars in the front of the train, then have a group of locos in the middle and then empties on the rear, thus your dpu's are not pushing on empties they are pulling them.

[@RoseSupreme]

I bet waiting at the crossing would be a nightmare. XD

[@jusomeguy]

Sometimes they build trains like this take them to a crew change point and separate them so that the DP units become the head end power for the rear section that's headed to a different destination. Saves crew costs between some terminals. The secret is "Don't look back"

[@jakemiillephotography]

That is so crazy. Can't wait till it starts coming over the hill.

[@robertcyprowski9345]

Damn I never seen a long train like happy for 295 cars that is a super long Union Pacific train like the video thumbs up

[@9682482]

Mouth hung open!! The record for number of cars I'd seen in a train video was previously 160. That has been blown away. This train had 295 cars in it!!

[@maryparedes2492]

On Sunday January 10 2010 a long Union Pacific crossing Maple Ave Montebello California

[@JoaoT805]

aww why isnt it your best shot snuffy? its great. a rare catch too. the length is just crazy. non stop stacks of containers!

[@phuchoanggia8499]

Third longest train ever with actually 295 cars (not 296) and 9 engines (3x2x2x2)

[@Matt56120]

Thats some serious haulage there. Great catch mate

[@AmtrakSilverStar]

IDILBF-08 - Lead unit is the UP 7454 (Train is DP'ed 3x2x2x2) 295 Loads - 0 Empties - 15,498 tons - 18,061 Feet

[@cab4]

@cisan The reason they are in the middles is because they pick up the slack. Essentially, if you tried to pull the train from only the front, you're rip the couplers right out of the train. The middle units relieve the pressure on the couplers to an acceptable limit. Also, most locomotives can run in multiple with only one crew operating from one cab. These CERTAINLY would have that capability, being some of the newest stuff around.

[@LackawannaChannel]

Nine units, three front, two 1/3 back, two 2/3 back and two on the tail -- that is distributed power. They have worked out the kinks -- I expect to see more of this. Labor is the biggest cost and these trains save on labor.

[@thetiger2133]

being stuck at that red light waiting for the train to pass. could write a novel in that time

[@BeetleBerlin]

As a former employee of the CNW(Cheap and Nothing Wasted), I'm not going to tell you what we thought UP meant. They do know how to run a railroad.

[@judithwhite5855]

I loved this video ,I have never seen this long a train before. Excellent video!

[@NewYorkPixels]

4:26 That driver must be pissed off LOL!!

[@willberestartingthischanne9984]

4:26

[@BNSFandSP]

I heard a CSX dispacter in Richmond say he saw 500 car coal trains (yes, loaded) with mid - train helpers when he was young.

[@kewanw16]

Two more locomotives carrying another load at the same time ?that's crazy!

[@2000Ajjet]

Was this that 'experimental' drag that everyone was worried about? I remember seeing an aerial shot of it on FoxNewsNZ, the locals along it's route were up in arms over such a dangerously long train passing through their communities if one ever got out of control....Wow that's impressive by the way, and I thought our 1km long freight trains were impressive enough.

[@AS768]

INSANE! I wonder how long it'd take to stop at that speed if the brakes were thrown into emergency all at once.

[@oro5103]

I can only imagine 2 things. When this train arrives to its port (or cargo station to be loaded on trucks) to unload, and how long this will take until the freight stop pushing the engine for 3-4 miles before it stops in an emergency. And finally when the air rake system gets through the whole train to stop the freight pushing the engine.

[@junioraotu7655]

That's the reason they put remote-controlled locomotives at strategic places in the middle of the cars.

[@SF3751]

I'm sure some people at the crossing gates weren't too thrilled LOL. Nice catch Snuffy.

[@DaaYay]

Not only that, locomotives evenly distributed along the train help pull evenly helping prevent derailment. If not the train would be vulnerable to derailment at either half of the train to 3 quarters of the train without the DPU's. I beleive I read it was 3+98+2+98+2+100+2 (Plus/minus 1)

[@moonwalker5058]

Thats one sweet horn! I think this video is really really cool!!! NICE:)

[@Chapas45]

Saw a lot of these in Vegas. Two, three sets of locomotives with 200+cars.

[@Boss302fan]

@iceman977th The horsepower actually doesn't pump air per se. It does provide electricity to operate air compressors that in turn produce air pressure. Basically only so much air is going through the pipes at any given time no matter how much horsepower

[@lorirocks777]

Great video... those car drivers must've been ticked

[@3rdandlong]

Holy Shit!!! Did I count 10 engines to move that many cars? I lost count. Geezzzzz.Great timing if you knew it would that long.

[@rwcmick]

Thanks for this! FYI, this train was mentioned on WSJ.

[@DISGUYROX]

Damn, the gates just went down and I have to pee.

[@garrettrainbolt1344]

Grab that 2 liter bottle that's been sitting in your car for the past 3 months

[@Boss302fan]

@alladinmoua You summarized it quite well. A train is only as strong as the strength of the drawbar pulling the most train weight. I've seen many instances when drawbars are just simply pulled out of the car. Normally this is do to "train handling" and not overall train weight. I never worked in the mountain district on UP (SP) but I've talked with many who have. Amazing terrain. Have a good one.

[@shadowknight227]

this gives new meaning to "moving america"

[@rc4lifebnsf]

Beautiful train I wish I was there to see it. That is the king of all trains. Thats is the longest train in the world.

[@DagorDagorathSauron]

Nope, google BHP Iron Ore in Western Australia. Almost 8km long and 100,000 tonnes heavy

[@paname514]

In France 4 locomotives with a total power output of 18.56 MW / 25 200 hp for 16 passenger coaches is common... that's a double TGV and it goes at 320 km/h.

[@JakobM325]

WOW this is great Counted 298 Double stacks and 7 Engines Awsum !!

[@Cappie2707]

a good reason to come late at school

[@Boss302fan]

@Bran01E A container on this train is basically a truck. There's no 4 to 1 ratio between what is being hauled here and a truck.

[@Starfield1959]

That is a MONSTER !! This Iron Leviathan navigating California with all it's prohibitive curvature and gradient was a sight to see. Great Post !!! Great Catch !!! How often do see something like this !!! What was the this ? A transfer move to a nearby L.A. Port?

[@Boss302fan]

@galovergirl711 It has always been a 'concerted group effort'. Railroads have almost always taken freight to warehouses or distribution centers where trucks in turn delivered to final destinations. In the 1800's it was steam taking freight to warehouses where horses moved the product to the end. Good observation

[@GoldenRailsMedia]

people at the crossing must have been mad to be stopped at the crossing for so long!

[@Boss302fan]

Why not. Billing accuracy for railroads in North America is highly automated and far more accurate than it used to be. With EDI 404/417 messaging being almost completely universal now among railroads and customers the old issues associated with lost cars or cars without billing is very rare.

[@Metalchick721]

correction 46 five piece (weld) cars 3 three (piece) cars 57 singles 9 engines 858 axles

[@CrackBack1000]

@Pendragon1989, not as long as one might think. When you apply the brakes they start applying from all the locomotives. And since there are 9 locomotives throughout the train the air sets rather quickly.

[@86kubus]

2P+100W+2P+98W+2P+99W+2P O ILE SIĘ NIE POMYLIŁEM W OBLICZENIACH ;p TO JEST MOC !

[@thayakarthi1503]

Great catch!

[@UntouchedWagons]

holy cow that must take forever to stop. My grandfather used to work on the Ontario Northland Railroad and he said their coal trains would take 30 miles to stop.

[@RailRide]

There is an O gauge record of 751 cars and ten engines, for a total length of 685 feet. Naturally, it had to be done outdoors, but this particular train could be done--all you need is the space and the funds to buy all those cars :).

[@lamontbowe8511]

This experiment was done 10 years ago to show that you can make a train any length. Efficiency, probably not, imagine waiting for your train car but it's on a train that's 3 mi long. Then you have to break that train down to get that one car. That might take over 2 to 3 hours then that long train wherever is sitting is going to be in the way of some form of traffic. But at least they don't have to pay 10 crewman to do this. So it does benefit the company but not the people

[@nathanielgreen4138]

this is better than anything ive caught

[@DRadioflyer]

Holy COW!!! That sure was HUGE!!! Won't see that anywhere in my area! But I'd gladly sit and wait for it to go by :-)

[@Boss302fan]

@mikey69up - The movements involved in this shipment and others like it were within scheduling tolerances based on customer ETA's. This included making scheduled sailings and drayage deliveries. Whether or not these movements continue will be subject to study. There is no "lack of planning" involved. A great deal of study went into moves like this. Just like when the first 110 car unit trains were run.

[@espeescotty]

The dude waiting in the car at the crossing is like...I'VE GOTTA PISS!!!!!!!

[@tejasnite]

Awesome ROLLIN DOWN THE RAILS

[@mso3355]

WOW! This beast is more than 3 miles long! It would be killer if someone could actually model this train.

[@lilliebostic9665]

holy cow that's a long train with 9 units

[@Finetales]

DANG that was long! I wonder how far the traffic was backed up at the crossing!

[@luciahelena3519]

Yes, this train it says 296 cars

[@wasted6666]

Awesome Buddy Thanx Brendan

[@alladinmoua]

@msharmsen The locomotives in the middle and back are distributive power units. With current technology, locos not attached to the first engine can now be controlled by the conductor at the front of the train by use of computers. The more locomotives you put at the front of a long train, the more strain there is on the couplers and the greater the risk of breaking the train apart. By distributing them semi-equally throughout the train, there is a less likely chance of the train tearing apart.

[@Donmeister85]

Damn, nearly 400 double stacked cars? I sat here watching this video waiting for my gf and kinda lost count. I know it was like, for every 100 cars, there were 2 locomotives. INSANE!

[@Bran01E]

Daaaaaammnn. This train is like half the size of Rhode Island. It must have taken 10 miles to make this thing come to a complete stop. If those were trucks that would be too many because it takes like 4 trucks for 1 large container.

[@BigAlFPV17]

Wow!!! What a train!! I think that was when they did that test to see if they can pull long trains like the one you got.